TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vrael22 Archive

View 10 posts and 98 comments by Vrael22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

/r/thathappened
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:33 PM
1

That's a good way to have a weak military
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:22 PM
12

On the night of the 2016 election, I called my brother who was on campus at University of Oregon to see if he was safe. I had to call him because idiots were literally throwing shit in near riot over the results of an election that Oregon went blue in anyways.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:53 PM
36

Remember when Democrats wanted free speech so badly they sat and protested in the 60s for the right for everyone to be heard? Now the same Democrats are fighting FOR censorship. Disclaimer: I'm pretty heavily libertarian on the governmental front
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:31 PM
1

I thought this was the Bee for a second
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:05 AM
8

Now to convince the wife to get some of those....
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:53 PM
1

Yeah. How about no. I'm providing for my wife and daughter. Or is that sexist too? I can't tell anymore
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:57 PM
2

I posted this in another thread so I'll post it here: Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts were based on the idea of building friendships and bonds with each of the same sex. Girl Scouts remains untouched but Boy Scouts now allows any sex in to be a scout. This is fine if you want to have a larger scouting program similar to the Boy Scouts then start it or petition for a different branch. My problem is that the places where men and boys can interact and grow as people are now less common than anything I c…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 06:59 PM
2

The hyperbole is strong here you need to dial it back. Al Franken should resign. Just like Roy Moore should not be elected. It's stupid that people put political blinders on things like this.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:19 PM
134

Both can be in the wrong.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:17 PM
-2

Yah I'm not seeing this. My wife will literally not let me do laundry because for whatever reason I can't figure out how to do it properly. If it were up to me is but everything a size larger than I need wash it all together and dry it all. She knows what fabrics can be dried and what can't. I've tried but I can't learn it for some absurd reason. Likewise, she let's me take care of our phone/computer stuff because she knows that's my area of expertise. No one in their right mind thinks that this…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:54 PM
12

Honest question. My daughter's hair is getting longer. Does anyone know how to go about doing this so I can do the same for my daughter? I bet my wife would be appreciative
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:51 PM
2

Dammit didnt expect to feel today. I'm gonna go hug my toddler now.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 04:30 PM
2

So is anyone who either identifies as conservative or disagrees with the regressive leftists narrative
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:53 AM
2

I'll drink one for you tonight. Be well my friend
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:14 AM
3

I recently started a blog to get rid of some of the SJW illusions and broke down the 1 in 5 statistic here if you're interested : https://debunkedsite.wordpress.com/2016/01/22/debunkd-1-in-5/
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:32 PM
3

The nurses when my daughter was born 2 weeks ago didn't have any issue with me taking care of the paperwork at all while my wife slept so I got really fortunate it seems.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:26 AM
0

Commenting to save for later
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:12 AM
1

Holy cow.... Those are not people I want to be friends with
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:34 PM
1

Just finished watching a news release. A bunch of students marched on the U of O faculty office and wanted to know why no action was taken. I want to shake them all and tell them that it's because you can't do anything until there is proof and/or charges and the investigation is over
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:12 PM
3

I am confused as to whether SRS takes themselves seriously or if they're being like that on purpose in order to mess with people.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:10 PM
2

I actually hold to this. I personally have seen many fathers who were anything but. The fact of the matter is that because of the lack of Men's Rights there aren't a lot of fathers who do what they're supposed to. Fathers must teach their sons to be good fathers and I feel like with the political and familial climate in the last few years have not been conducive to fathers being able to teach their sons to be fathers. This is primarily seen in the feminist movement which has by and far contribut…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:13 PM
1

Thank you very much for this, it'll help me a lot next time this comes up. Are there any statistics or professionals with hard evidence to back it up? I believe you, I just want to make sure that there is a professional psychiatrist for example who did a study that I can direct my friend to.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:33 AM
1

She was trying to tell me that men are 100% the problem when it comes to society and relationship problems/abuse.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:36 AM
1

I didn't really mean to come across that men aren't more aggressive than women. What I was trying to do was point out that aggression doesn't necessarily beget violence. There are good outlets to aggression and that instead of blaming men for being violent we need to teach them what to do with that aggression instead of be violent. That's what I was trying to do but I'm not that eloquent so I was trying to get some help here as to how to present that argument.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:28 AM
1

There was a massive outcry. Especially when it came to the Holocaust. People were astounded by it and are still appalled by the atrocities committed. And I do know what those words mean. In fact, you're trying to make them mean something they don't. Simply because I think I'm doing something good (i.e. Burning Jews to make way for the master Aryan race) doesn't necessarily make it good. In fact, it might be pure evil. Yet, I perceive that I'm doing good so I continue with it. If good and evil ar…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:03 AM
1

Because there is a massive and unquenchable outcry against certain evil acts. Along with this, if there is no objectie right and wrong than why would there be any order? There must be objective right and wrong simply because if there wasn't then laws are useless and anyone can do as they please without being allowed to feel as if they're wronged.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:58 PM
1

No. I said that good and evil are objective. Perceptions of good and evil are subjective.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:37 AM
1

Not at all. I'm not saying that good and evil are subjective at all. I'm saying that there is concrete good and concrete evil. Perception of good and evil, however, depends on a variety of factors, some of which are under our control some of which are not.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:33 AM
1

Not necessarily. Being able to distinguish right from wrong does come as the result of a soul. But as human beings we are burdened with something called free will. This means that we are free to choose to do good or evil. Simply because someone choses to do evil doesn't make them soulless. The fact that we can recognize it as evil and take steps to eliminate that evil precipitates everyone having souls in the first place. I also ask you this. Does anyone who does evil truly believe that they are…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:22 AM
1

No, see what you're doing is you're not understanding my argument. Every single human being has a soul. The soul is what dictates right and wrong to us. It's not something physical to ourselves, although it's not entirely disconnected from ourselves entirely either. Without souls, people cannot make decisions based on right and wrong. You cannot justify an action as right wrong, good or evil without first acknowledging that humans are more than simply animals but spiritual beings as well who hav…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:19 PM
1

I know, and it pisses me off too because I can probably find a thousand other men with a similar story.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:27 PM
1

I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is that all humans have souls because if we don't there is no reason to not do these things. We aren't purely animals, there is far more to us.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:27 PM
1

I understand your point, and I can accept certain parts as true. However, I would argue that there have been many points where more has been accomplished by a strong leader with a clear sense of moral direction than without. Not necessarily saying that EVERYTHING they did was right, but let's look at FDR. He was president during what was probably the most tumultuous time in history. Yet, he made strong decisions. He tried, failed, and succeeded. Why was he so successful that he was elected four …
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:41 PM
1

My premise is not disprove and Hitler was a genius. He singlehandedly ripped Germany out of the post WWI depression they were facing, as well as made it into one of the most powerful countries in the world, all after coming into power. He was not the smartest tactician I grant you that and he did make mistakes, but if he was able to overpower so many why not simply acknowledge him as superior and follow his guidelines for the human race. Even removing Hitler from this argument, why even bother t…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:15 PM
1

I haven't once refuted any evidence you've presented because you haven't provided evidence. The only thing you've done is attempt to say that my argument is invalid. I would like to present to you that I'm not evangelizing my faith here. I've not once mentioned it, I'm merely arguing a premise that my faith supports without hardly mentioning it. Yes, I have stated that it's my belief, and I understand that you have your beliefs and I respect that. Still, respect does not imply consent that your …
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:01 PM
1

Then using this logic, why legislate at all? You see, there are such a wide variety of beliefs that there has to be some overarching idea of what's best for people as a whole that must be legislated. I believe that therein lies most of the problem with debate over legislation over everything.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:41 AM
0

Why does it get no respect? I resect your argumentation, even though I disagree with it. Why not reciprocate?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:31 AM
1

I would like to present to you the fact that everyone legislates based on their personal beliefs. No matter what. There is not a single objective person who legislates base on objectivity.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:27 AM
0

How is there no reason to believe that we are spiritual? How is this messing up my MRA views? I agree with 90% of what MRA stands for. Isn't the whole point of this is to be accepting of people with different beliefs and to respect them for? Isn't that exactly what we're trying to prevent the hardcore feminists from doing? I understand, we got off on this topic so if you want to continue this discussion I'd be more than happy to via PM on Reddit. Back to the topic at hand, I want to know how thi…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:14 AM
-2

I said slightly. But my experiences are grounded in real life. Though I'm only twenty years old, I've been though and seen a lot that might surprise people. The fact of the matter is, I believe what I believe for a lot of reasons and my personal experiences might be part of that. In no reason does that make my argument or logic invalid.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:08 AM
1

I am a traditionalist but I haven't mentioned or referenced the Bible once, I have restrained from doing so because I know that this reaches outside of the bounds of what my faith is. Honestly, I have found that in most cases Masturbation just causes more frustration. I never meant to imply that it ruins sex lives. What I meant t say is that it's not what is truly needed. When sexual urges arise it's natural, I completely understand that. What's needed is a different outlet. An outlet that's hea…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:05 AM
-1

How are human rights and morality related to intelligence alone? There are a thousand and one morality theories out there, each one with a certain merit to them, though not necessarily moral in their execution. Let's for the moment assume that you're correct and humans are 100% animal, no spirit and just super intelligent. Why then, did we stop Hitler? He was a brilliant human being who was clearly superior to the countries around him. The Germans were winning vastly. Logically speaking, the res…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:37 AM
0

Correct. People try to argue that sex is merely an act done by animals and that we are merely animals. This is false given the inherent mental and emotional damage that occurs in rape victims which is an argument I used though I might not have been very clear about that before. Masturbation takes the intimacy out of sex and give physical relief. Pornography encourages the act of masturbation which removes the intimacy of sex. It becomes a purely selfish act when true sexual intimacy is both the …
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:26 AM
-4

No I wasn't saying that. I know Pornography has nothing to do with. I was using rape as an example of how sex and sexual release is supposed to be intimate. People who are raped are hurt far more than just physically, they're hurt mentally and spiritually as well. This shows that sex and sexual release is supposed to be intimate. Pornography and masturbation creates a disconnect from the body and intimacy that sex is supposed to have.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:41 AM
-3

I might be projecting slightly, but this is also from observation of other relationships that I've seen torn down by lust. Lust and admiration are to work in conjunction with each other within the bounds of a healthy relationship to create a good sexual experience. I've also talked with counselors and those who are far more trained and eloquent than I and they agree that within the bounds of a healthy relationship is when sex is at its best and healthiest. I have never heard an expert say that p…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:32 AM
-5

Yet we strive for human rights and worker's compensation for injured coal miners even though we don't know them. Why? Because we're all basically human even though we don't know these people personally we know that they're human and should not be objectified in life.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:20 AM
-3

Morality makes its case on the fact that human beings are more than animals which we are. Yes, we belong to the animal kingdom, but we are inherently spiritual beings. How can you make the argument that anything is wrong or right if we are merely animals? Do people say it's wrong for a lion to kill another for dominance of the pride? No they don't because Lions are purely animals. Yet there is such an aversion when a human being is killed that we hold funerals to honor the dead and mourn them lo…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:16 AM
-4

Not really. Think about it. Lust means:Having very strong sexual desire. It's not sexual desire in and of itself, but a strong sexual desire. When something is strong, it alters behavior. For example, bitterness which is strong angst and anger towards a person will change their behavior as a whole and not for the beter.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:21 AM
-5

You can, within the bounds of a healthy relationship. Based on my past, personal belief, and what I've observed in other relationships, I believe that sex should be abstained from until marriage. I recognize that not all share this belief, so I offer you this: Lust and admiration can work together to create sexual desire that's healthy, so long as you understand the object of your desire is a person and not a body on a computer screen that's lusted after and not an object of merely sexual desire…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:19 AM
-6

Exactly, so why would I support something that helps facilitate the act of masturbation when the people being portrayed in these videos/photos etc. aren't being valued as human beings be they male or female? Why would I support something where the only goal of the video/photo is to orgasm in a fit of physical release where there is no intimacy involved when there is clearly intimacy in sexual acts, leading to why rape is so violently traumatizing to both men and women who have been sexually assa…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:17 AM
-3

Not necessarily. Lusting is wanting someone sexually so much that it affects all of your actions.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:14 AM
-5

Yet if we're merely animals, where do we get our inherent desire for more out of life? For more than just stuff and sex and beer? Why is it that people are constantly searching for that missing part.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:14 AM
-11

Exactly the problem. There is no intimacy with the sexual pleasure when the two are created to be hand in hand (no pun intended).
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:58 PM
-12

That's the problem though. The disconnection from the intimacy of sex via pornography. The thing about this disconnect is that it creates a wall between sexual pleasure and intimacy which is what sex is supposed to be.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:55 PM
-6

Admiration is separate from lust. Admiration is looking at someone's beauty and liking their beauty. Lust is when someone alters normal behavior to obtain sexual release and pleasure from the object of lust.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:13 PM
-15

I'd like to preface this statement by saying that porn is one of the very few things I disagree with MRA about. I don't that it victimizes women and men so much as objectifies them in a very real sense that they become subjects to be lusted after, and not people to be admired.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:37 PM
2

Thanks. She moved back to her home state and is marrying some other unfortunate man.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:29 PM
1

You're welcome. I am a strong Christian though I haven't always been so. When making arguments about why I believed what I believe it's hard for me not to bring the Bible into it as it's such a large part of my life and who I am but I do what I can. We can agree to disagree on some points and I appreciate your civility in discussing this matter with me. The internet is never as kind as you have been.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 05:30 PM
2

I see where you're coming from, but I would like to refute some of your points with a few of my own. It doesn't make future sex any more special I would strongly disagree with this point. The coming together of woman and man as one for the first time is a holy and special event that can only happen once for the woman and man each. This is a moment that when shared between husband and wife becomes more than just a deflowering for lack of a better term. It becomes a moment when they both say to th…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:50 PM
1

My view on porn is that it has a negative effect in 99.9% of cases. For example, if I were to look at porn for a while before having a girlfriend and we decided to become intimate with each other, I would have those images of porn flashing through my head the whole time. Perhaps not right away, but I believe that over time and in the subconscious that porn erodes the reality of the intimacy and oneness of sex. This is also why I believe in abstaining from sex before marriage. The way I see it, p…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:10 PM
2

I stay away from porn because I believe it erodes my ability to judge women fairly. Don't get me wrong, I'm an MRA all the way, but this is one of a few areas where I disagree with some of things. Certainly a woman should'n't be going through her boyfriend's/husband's computer for these things. The responsible thing to do is talk to her husband/Boyfriend about this. As far as spying websties, why would you even do this to your Significant other? Why would a man spy on his wife/girlfriend, or vic…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:06 AM
5

Is there anyway that we can report this to the site admins or site mods for this? We have a screencap of the tweet and everything. Her e-mail should be with her twitter account I believe. This is something that is outright wrong to do.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:33 AM
2

I reported the page itself.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:45 AM
2

I guess so. I honestly get angry because this isn't how we're supposed to elect people.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:06 PM
1

I tend to agree with you. However, I also believe that by inundating girls at such a young age with these stereotypes leads to them developing negative stereotypes of men when they become older as the men they see don't live up to their expectations. They then look for reasons to force men into their bubbles in order to make them fit what they want a man to be.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:45 PM
1

What exactly is your driving point here?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:12 AM
1

Hmmm.....well I'm not entirely sure. I have seen a lot of those types of movies with my girlfriend because she likes those.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:26 AM
25

The Onion.com
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:22 AM
5

Okay, thank you so much.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:34 PM
2

I have a slightly unrelated question...I was scrolling through some of the comments and I came across a few I wanted to downvote....why was there no downvote button? There are in every other subreddit I visited to today. Is there a glitch or what? Sorry if this is unrelated I was just wondering.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:04 PM
2

In the article we read she more or less said that males don't bring emotional support to a relationship that a woman can. I brought it up that I agree to an extent but I had issue when she said that "bringing home the bacon" so to speak doesn't give emotional support. I said that it does because having economic stability in the home and being able to provide does bring emotional stability and support and that men care in different ways then women do but they are not incapable of giving emotional…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:16 AM
1

Women do have those responsibilities but when a man asks a woman out he is to be a courteous as possible and treat her with the utmost respect and do all of those things.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:57 AM
1

Not shove it in our faces and be rude when we try to be courteous. It's as much part of being a man as being involve in children's lives. Women complain about chauvinism and yet they get upset if a man hold a door or gets up to offer a seat to them, then they expect those things and wonder "where the good men have gone". If they would simply allow us to be courteous gentleman the "good men" wouldn't be gone.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:36 PM
1

Okay as a man I have to say that this is okay. Part of being a gentleman that a woman wants is treating her. I'm not saying that the man should pay for everything all of the time, but it's courteous. The fact of the matter is that women should assist but the man should pay for it if he as the ability. It's simple courtesy.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:24 AM
2

You know I do believe that women have somewhat of a right to be crazy although this in itself is wrong. As a side note I don't think this was meant to be serious. One of those teenage girl things that are supposed to be "funny" and "To all prospective boyfriends"
/r/MensRights28/04/12 03:07 PM
1

Which is retarded though. The man is just as important to the raising of the child.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 03:40 AM
0

Okay, I agree that there is an epidemic of men leaving their families and abandoning their children to be raised by their mother alone which is wrong even when the mother is hostile, actually, ESPECIALLY when the mother is hostile but still....this woman obviously needed some help and if she left the baby unattended that's the equivalent of negligent homicide isn't it?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:24 PM
7

Women want men to be courteous to them but they can't extend the same to men. I agree that men should be courteous to women but at the same time it's a two way street. Men don't necessarily want to be courteous if those same courtesies are not extended to them.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:42 AM
1

Yah, see the diagnoses that are correct have problems because the drugs kill personality and whatnot. They need to be reformulated.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:20 PM
1

So medication might've helped but it was formulated in a sense to dampen your personality to the point where you were nothing more than a cardboard cutout?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:08 PM
1

Ah. So the medication turned you into someone you're not? Unless you feel uncomfortable how exactly did it make you feel internally?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:03 PM
1

Now are you legitimately ADHD or misdiagnosed?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:57 PM
1

Lol definitely.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:56 PM
2

Agreed. It needs to be shared along with his other books. I'm going to start Fathered by God after I'm done with Wild at Heart again and the field manual for that book is actually free! He mentions this at the end of Wild at Heart so I got the book for my eReader at $12
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:44 PM
2

No problem! It's definitely helped me a lot and I'm still working through it all. God's opened my eyes to a lot of things through this and I am so grateful He sent John Elderidge!
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:38 PM
2

Yeah it's a guide book that takes you through Wild at Heart more personally. You can find it online here http://ransomedheart.com/node/573
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:30 PM
1

I understand your point completely ma'am.We as men need to stand up and personally take responsibility and say that yes we will be aggressive but there also needs to be a tenderness and compassion for women. The way I see it, women are brought up to believe that they can do anything a man can do which if I understand your post correctly you disagree with. There is definitely a difference between men and women and not just physically. Women tend to be the kind hearted soothing sex whereas men are…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:28 PM
1

I agree. I have a cousin who is autistic as well. There are certain minorities who are legitimately threatened but overall the way I see it is that people need to realise, especially with men and women, that men are becoming vilified and shown that they are no to be themselves. That bit about autism shocked me because I would tear down any institution that tried to put my cousin in an institution without just cause.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:18 PM
5

I'm not saying that medication for ADHD is a bad thing. The fact is that people overdiagnose boys with ADHD when nine times out of ten it's just the natural boisterousness of boys being boys. And I am glad the medication has helped you sir!
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:16 PM
1

Indeed it is. This is my third time through the book and I have the field manual as well so it's a far more eye opening than ever before.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:14 PM
1

This is something I'm undecided on. The way I see it men or more apt to develop certain diseases than women which justifies an increase in health insurance payments but at the same time look at the individual to determine payment. If it's an obese man he's going to have a lot of health complications so make him pay more if the insurance is going to have to cover them. But if it's an obese woman and a healthy male make the woman pay more because of the health complications. There should definitel…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:10 AM
1

It is. People have been so ingrained with fear of offending "minorities" that they will step around corners in order to be politically correct which causes a lot more difficulty for those who are not minorities. Equality is sameness, and accept the fact that people will never be equal. There will always be another minority fighting. Along those lines don't think that I am elitist or advocating the oppression of anyone. I am a somewhat poor, 19 year old half Mexican Republican who is a freshman i…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:45 AM
1

This is emasculating. When they went co-ed they opened their doors to all sexes. Equal treatment is not equal if both sides are not treated. Making sure that one has certain facilities that another doesn't is not equalising. What it is is sexism. It's the same as racism. It goes both ways. There is a huge outcry if a male says something offhand about a woman or a white man about another race, but if a woman says something offensive about males or a black person about a white person it is brushed…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:27 AM
1

It's all good. And it just doesn't seem plausible.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:27 PM
1

Exactly. So why did they get him in trouble for if he did the right thing and reported it?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:54 PM
1

Right but reporting the distributor would deprive him of the child porn he supposedly had downloaded.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:42 AM
1

Why would he report himself for child pornography? It makes no sense. Ue logic.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter