TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WDoE Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by WDoE on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Bro, the more people you talk to, the looser your lips get. If you don't shut the fuck up, they're going to end up dragging on your chin. Can't believe you're unaware of this anatomical fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 01:39 PM
0

Some people won't date you if you're tall. Some people won't date you if you're short. Some people won't date you if you're a certain gender. Some people won't date you for liking certain hobbies. Some people won't date you for doing drugs. Some people won't date you UNLESS you do drugs. The idea that someone's value is based on how many people would date them is so monumentally stupid that it speaks mountains about the insecure character of anyone who utters it.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 01:34 PM
2

Hopefully the idea of escalation of force isn't too controversial. But already someone piped in saying it isn't just about self defense, it's about justice and teaching women a lesson. Ew.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 01:41 AM
1

What if she has a weapon? Escalation of force still applies. Or what if she gets a lucky sucker punch to the jar and it knocked him out cold and he dies because when he falls and hits his head on the cement? If it's a sucker punch, then the fight hasn't even started. Are you suggesting to preemptively hit women just in case they decide to get violent? So even in self-defense, a man might assume that a woman poses no real threat to him, but he also could be wrong. True of anyone trying to defend …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 01:35 AM
1

It's about escalation of force. Use enough force to defend yourself. You don't cave someone's skull in for slapping you. That isn't self defense, it's just murder. If someone poses no threat, you have no reason to use excessive force. Whether it is a man, woman, or child, doesn't matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 12:37 AM
3

Don't get me wrong, she's a shitty person for doing it If she even did it. People exaggerate and lie about stupid delinquent shit all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 11:36 AM
1

Got an actual name / location rather than an unprovable claim? Should be easy for me to verify. Edit: Guess not. Calling BS.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:45 PM
0

Name one that only has a single room / stall with a urinal... I've been to tons of theaters and never seen it.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 06:32 PM
1

You think a theater isn't going to have more than one urinal? Ridiculous. Guarantee this is just fake bait. But OP can feel free to post the location, and I'm sure someone can check.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:26 AM
-2

Demolished every single argument you had, so you resort to character insults. I'll take the W, thanks!
/r/MensRights10/12/18 02:45 PM
-7

its showcasing how men aren't toxic, None of it showcases anything about how men aren't toxic. it showcasing how men do not have a monopoly on violence its showcasing how men are on the receiving end of DV just as much as women, etc. None of it compares mens DV rates to womens How feminism and it's proponents influence hate between genders and social discord Just like this irrelevant post is doing. it also highlights how misogyny is a crime in the UK but misandry is not. Lol no. Misandry and mis…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 02:26 PM
-3

So please explain how this relates to mens' rights. Pro-tip: It doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 02:14 PM
-6

This sub was taken over long ago by woman hating extremists. Just like many feminism movements were taken over by man hating extremists. Best to move on at this point.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:49 PM
-1

All the feminists I know openly discuss how feminism includes and helps men as well. The whole man hating feminist trope is something I've only seen online.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:09 PM
-6

Feminism =/= womanism. Everyone has feminine and masculine traits.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:57 PM
11

What? CS was actuality pretty hostile for the 3 women I met in my program. I can't give you proof, but I can give you a bunch of personal examples starting with early childhood on why there are less women in CS and likely STEM. From a very young age, I and all males I knew had blocks, Duplo, then Lego. All my female cousins had dolls and play ovens. I didn't ask for my first toys. I couldn't even talk. Due to g ender roles, I was groomed to create and build. My female counterparts were groomed t…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 07:00 PM
13

Being unhappy with the gender someone was assigned at birth being a mental illness makes about as much sense as thinking a short person wearing heels has a mental illness. Enjoy your pedophilia obsessed LARP group. I'll be over here questioning YOUR sanity.
/r/PussyPass22/02/17 10:36 PM
1

The difference is that you are claiming maintenance shouldn't exist. I am claiming it should exist on a case by case basis. Showing one example where both people are equally affected by a joint decision does fuck all nothing to prove your point. Your argument must be based on principle, not example. So far, your only principle based argument has been personal autonomy. I can give you several cases where maintenance makes perfect sense. How about the billionaire who divorces their recently disabl…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:22 PM
1

Let me guess, single? It's not like a person just decides to have a baby on their own in a marriage. It is a joint decision. You're literally saying one partner should get the shared benefit of a child without assuming any risk. No one is claiming anyone forced another person to stay home and sabotage their career. You're refuting an argument no one is even making. Anyway, done talking to the wall. Disabling inbox replies. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:07 PM
1

Then no one in their right mind should ever be a stay at home parent. The risk is too high. Married couples don't make an individual decision to have a kid and sabotage one of their careers. They make the decision as a unit. That's the whole damn point of being married
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:48 PM
2

It's almost like couples make a decision as a couple. It's not like everyone who decided to have a kid wanted to be a full time parent with no job. Sometimes, just sometimes, a couple decides to have a child and not put it in daycare while they both work.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:35 AM
2

It has a place. If one partner forgoes their professional career to be a stay at home parent under the pretenses that their income will be subsidized by the partner that works, that partner is in a worse position after divorce. That should be reflected with maintenance.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 02:30 AM
-1

I'd love to hear what this sub would think if a guy had a one night stand, then 11 years later found out he has a kid and owes back child support. He totally shouldn't pay just because some woman deceived him by hiding a child for 11 years, right? And then there's this... Some guy raises a child for 11 years, finds out he isn't the biological father, and still is on the hook. He totally shouldn't pay just because some woman deceived him by hiding sleeping around, right? Here's the missing piece:…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter