TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WackyConundrum Archive

View 2 posts and 150 comments by WackyConundrum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
63

DiscriminationWackyConundrum/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:43 AM
43

Anti-MRMWackyConundrum/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:56 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I love making universal statements about groups of people based on a TikTok single mom who presents only her side of the story. It's somewhat difficult to argue with your inferences when the premise is on quicksand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:07 PM
1

What are those red pill lies?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 02:11 PM
5

Next up: men should open up more.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:38 AM
9

From Wikipedia: Emotional intelligence (EI), also known as emotional quotient (EQ), is the ability to perceive, use, understand, manage, and handle emotions. High emotional intelligence includes emotional recognition of emotions of the self and others, using emotional information to guide thinking and behavior, discerning between and labelling different feelings, and adjusting emotions to adapt to environments. This includes emotional literacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:35 AM
–

Oh, we got our first mindreader. Neat.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:48 PM
1

I don't care about your choices, but your reasoning is absurd. The entire first paragraph is not mitigated by living apart. Nothing really changes (definitely not for the better).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:05 AM
5

Porn actors are getting paid. It's their job. The have a director, a storyline, a plan of what to do, and they perform what's written for their roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 07:04 AM
0

You think these women are going to be attracted to predatory foreign men that despise feminism? If you're implying that ppbs are "predatory" you better support that claim with something.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 08:51 AM
1

A passport bro is a guy who goes to another country (usually less developed) that will automatically raise his SMV (sexual market value) due to his height, exotic look, race, status, and wealth. He goes there to find a relationship, that is, he goes abroad for love.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 07:57 AM
0

I watched some videos by passport bros and by locals. From what I can tell, they often get into relationships, marriages, sometimes start families. The interviewees sometimes say that they know people (a friend, an aunt, etc.) who are in relationships with foreigners and they're quite happy with them. So, all of this demonization and the comments by women under this post look like they're disconnected from reality. Reality? Well, I only watch videos, so they don't present the entirety of the pic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 07:54 AM
1

OP, why even be here if all of your replies are AI generated?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:27 AM
-6

You missed the point. We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:54 AM
10

We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:53 AM
-4

You missed the point. We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:52 AM
-4

You missed the point. We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:50 AM
-6

We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:49 AM
-8

We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:48 AM
-8

OK, so one group is clean. That's nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:48 AM
-3

We all know these groups share unverified imagined false stories written in revenge or out of boredom. And they share personal information linked to someone's photo. OP being disgusting is exactly the point for the analogy to work. The current AWDTSG groups are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:46 AM
1

Do you happen to have a critique of or a response to antinatalism as philosophy?
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:06 PM
1

No one wants to get back home to a modern Independent woman girl boss which needs to negotiate everything from the position of entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:25 AM
2

One of the reasons is the fact that age-gap relationships are heavily demonized by modern Independent women, feminists / misandrists. Male sexuality is vilified, as are men in general, so it's natural it is met with a response.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:41 PM
5

You're not doing yourself any favors by having such a lackluster definition, where it's basically manosphere == red pill. You found have just used "red pill" in the entire text (not to mention that the English language red pill is quite different than Polish language red pill).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 06:28 AM
1

The Left is already very feminist, gynocentrist, anti male, misandrist. It's clear they wouldn't be able to provide any good solution for men. Mansplaining, toxic masculinity, man keeping, rape culture, choosing the bear, and so on are coming exclusively from the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 05:57 AM
5

What are you talking about? It's the left that constantly comes up with new ways of bashing men: mansplaining, toxic masculinity, man keeping, emotional labour, and so on. And their advice is, as OP said, "just go to therapy, bro".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 05:43 AM
5

Utility (providing) and beauty (youth & fertility) are not values of some "oppressive system". We've had these values for thousands of years, likely since before we were homo sapiens. It's biology. Your text assumes that the manosphere is something bad. It looks more like a Boogeyman to which you can stick whatever nasty things you want. You haven't explained why we should fear this Boogeyman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 05:37 AM
4

Which is why many cultures have/had practices where the parents had to accept a suitor for the dating to even be a possibility. The parents are older and wiser, and they can see through bullshit more easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 08:26 AM
1

The spending part is clearly false. If it were a problem you would be bombarded with ads with married couples. They exist but they're not on the forefront. In fact, most ads we see are directed at singles or simply individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:50 AM
0

Interesting. What are the sources for these stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 07:14 AM
3

So you support universal draft to the army in times of crisis and war?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:15 PM
4

Which makes it even more difficult for any individual man, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:10 PM
15

Oh, so the point is complaining that top 1% of people own 80% of wealth? You're complaining that super rich are super rich? What's the point? This is essentially you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:02 PM
9

The terms are defined mathematicaly: for example, top 10% in getting likes. It's just like the 1% in economical term of who has the most wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:39 AM
1

Almost all comments are trying to argue against the OP, so I'll try the opposite. I'm not sure the judgment is entirely false. Women only have to wait for suitors, and then they can be selective and picky. Women are the "evolutionary prize", after all. Men have to struggle. Men have to become men, make something out of themselves, prove themselves, get good, and show their worth. This has been the case in many (most?) societies across the world for generations of maybe even forever. Eggs are pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:13 AM
–

In a sense, yes. They are ugly do they are easy to spot. Or rather, they are easily ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 06:46 AM
-7

Women get pregnant. Men don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 03:04 PM
8

No, because these things are very expensive. More muscle mass requires more food -> easier to die of starvation. There is no free lunch. There always are some constraints.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:02 PM
4

Incorrect. It's called "sexual selection".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 12:59 PM
10

Ah, yes, argumentum ad incelum. It should be common knowledge that the left uses tough-sounding buzzwords as insults and nothing else. "Racist", "misogynist", "incel", "Nazi", "fascist", "transphobe" — all of them mean only "I don't like you because you don't think like me" and nothing more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:45 PM
1

$$$
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:00 PM
1

At this point you couldn't say anything good or bad of any large group, including MAGA and feminists, because there would always be "some people" and not all people in a group characterized by any feature. That the left is against men is pretty well known. Feminist misandry is open and rampant on TikTok and YouTube. Kamala Harris' campaign infamously tried to use men for political reasons. Many young women don't like or hate young men according to the recent viral poll. The Left has no alternati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 05:14 AM
1

Because there are lots of people on the left who hate men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 05:07 PM
25

I saw the video. It's disgusting. He said that that hitpiece of a "documentary" was an accurate representation of the manosphere, concealing the diversity of groups and movements in it. He saw the move to the manosphere as the effect of pure propaganda and The Algorithm, sparked by a couple of select issues boys face, such as problems in school. He completely concealed the effect of approximately 51% of human population. No, according to Steven, women do not contribute at all to problems men fac…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:56 AM
53

I saw the video. It's disgusting. He said that that hitpiece of a "documentary" was an accurate representation of the manosphere, concealing the diversity of groups and movements in it. He saw the move to the manosphere as the effect of pure propaganda and The Algorithm, sparked by a couple of select issues boys face, such as problems in school. He completely concealed the effect of approximately 51% of human population. No, according to Steven, women do not contribute at all to problems men fac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 09:53 AM
5

The funny thing is, a lot of those women praising therapy are in therapy for quite some time and it's not really working for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 05:47 AM
7

Tate and Clav being the idols in the manosphere is a lie perpetuated by the Left + woke. In reality, these figures are more of an entertainment than anything people would take seriously. So, the premise of the post is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 02:10 PM
1

It should be consistent across contexts where our genes are consistent - it should not vary across societies or historical periods. But real life data shows the opposite: hypergamous marriages are inversely correlated with sexual equality across countries and historical periods. That is, what predicts the behavior in real life are social facts, not genetic facts. This is incorrect. Most, if not all, genetically endowed behaviors depend on appropriate context. For example, a bee will not perform …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:59 PM
1

Could you write up some more advice that women give/could give men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:13 PM
1

And what is your criticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:59 AM
4

Police will have a tough job: save women and be racist or be welcoming and misogynistic.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 07:31 AM
1

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:53 AM
1

The post is clearly written from the perspective of a woman looking down on men. It is the fault of men, the post implies with no subtleties. The question remains, though, why do women willingly engage in these sorts of relationships, when they're allegedly oh so bad for them? The most important aspect of OP is the utter concealment of women's agency. It looks like these relationships just happen to women, and they're not started by and sustained by them. Women have been completely infantilized …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:32 AM
0

Yes, but you're on the side of the political spectrum that hates you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 06:57 PM
1

But why are you still a leftist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 02:18 PM
1

Indeed. But even some leftists are waking up. See: r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates and r/Leftist_AntiFeminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:26 AM
2

O refuse to believe OP account is legitimate. Every post is construed to farm karma. What for? Good question...
/r/MensRights21/02/26 10:00 AM
9

If you can't sleep after reading some shitposting on the Internet, then maybe consider deleting all your social media and minimizing Internet use.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 12:39 PM
1

OK. In that case, they're the same picture. I don't see any important difference between them. It's just human ridiculing other people. As it has been done for the last couple of thousands of years, I presume.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 10:28 AM
1

I'm curious what is the outlook on short men from the right, and if there are any significant differences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 01:06 PM
1

Yes, the original tweet mentions height. But the quote tweet does not. So, no one, maybe except you, can see why you're talking about height in the first place. Height standards are always the result of a combination of natural selection and sexual selection. Why do you think pygmes are around 155 cm tall while Dinka are 190 cm tall?
/r/MensRights05/02/26 10:19 AM
1

We lived in a time and culture over hundreds and hundreds of years where women have been "little girlized" and princessized. Constantly. And men are just, whatever. We lived in times, where boys were going through very harsh passage rites, where they had to fend for themselves, use resourcefulness and strength from within, and then they came back strong, respected, and having a lot to say in the tribe. This is why men were making important decisions. Which is understandable, because men had been…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 10:11 AM
1

People have always been sorting themselves into very selective groups. You had punks, skins, metalheads, motorheads, goths, emos, hippies, etc. Even on Internet forums people sorted themselves into respective domains of interests. The "good old Internet" (maybe up to 2005 or 2010) simply was limited in the way people found others with similar features and the number of people frequently using Internet was way smaller, consisting in large part of gamers, nerds, and passionate people. Now, the sor…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 10:05 AM
1

People band up into identity groups and distinguish between "us" vs "them" not because of social media. We've been doing it for millions of years, way before we were homo sapiens.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:39 AM
1

The screenshot you posted doesn't seem to be talking about height at all in the quote response. Do you have some examples? Can you share a couple of those accounts? I'd like to check them out to see what that vitalism is. But it is obviously true that women's beauty standards drive male evolution. It's called sexual selection, and we see it in beetles, birds, seals, and in humans. So, it is a statement of fact that anything else. And if so, then it makes sense to recognize it and act accordingly…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:36 AM
14

And how addressing that will unfuck their psyche, make them not ugly, and push them into the embrace of a loving woman?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 01:08 AM
6

He talked about finding friends to not fester in internet echo chamber.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 01:05 AM
3

The only times I hear about them is from the lefties when they're hating on men and the manosphere. Apart from that, there may be a couple of instances, but they're never positive comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 07:49 AM
32

What we have learned from years of leftists calling transphobe, fascist, nazi, bigot, misandrist, racist, etc. the people who don't share their views is that defense and explaining yourself is not the way to go. You will not convince them with reason because they aren't attacking you with reason. They are using these slurs to discredit you. If you try to defend yourself you are just giving legitimacy to such attacks. The solution seems to be to just completely ignore it or even mock it and verba…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 01:53 PM
0

Calling everyone you disagree with has already backfired. By all means, keep going.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 01:49 PM
1

You lefties are constantly puzzled by reality. You seem to believe that all is the effect of propaganda, ideology, social constructs, power dynamics, "material conditions", and on and on. It's biology. Biological drives, instincts, and predilections are expressed in every culture. They look different based on time, place, etc. but they always are there. Why? Because there always are members of the species homo sapiens. If you want to get rid of "stereotypical gender roles" you would have to get …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 09:45 AM
3

trying to push the worst roles and burdens onto us. You know, they want to turn us into 'protectors and providers.' So what is your view on masculinity and gender roles?
/r/MensRights22/12/25 02:36 PM
1

She can just... talk to them IRL or from her real account. WTF.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:54 PM
4

And what was the response?
/r/MensRights19/12/25 07:22 AM
6

Yes, unfortunately, this isn't the best place to voice such messages. Better than preaching to the choir would be preaching in women's spaces.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:22 PM
45

And what about the legal battle? Have some of these people been convicted? Or is it still in progress?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 02:45 PM
1

You write worse than a schoolboy. How the fuck is this about men's rights anyway?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 01:57 PM
1

I didn't watch the video, but it's a fact that boys and men have a much stronger sex drive, and their sexuality is different, which is why they more easily get addicted to porn than women. See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/s/94myF1zAsz
/r/MensRights27/11/25 09:50 AM
1

The idea wasn’t created as a ‘question’, it was created as an answer to the question ‘Why men rape?’ There is nothing wrong with that question. the theory predict that only men rape This is false.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:42 PM
1

None of it is relevant to the topic.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:57 AM
1

Can you be more clear of what question you are arguing is valid? That men rape more than women? Because if so, as I said, the empirical evidence is far from definitive that men rape more. Brother, the evidence being not clear or absent is the very thing that makes the question be a valid research problem. The question I had in mind is whether men use rape as an evolved sexual strategy and in what circumstances.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:55 AM
1

I don't quite care about what text an LLM generated. But notice that in none of my comments I'm arguing that the hypothesis is correct. I'm merely stating that it makes sense, that is, posing it as a research question is valid and it would be scientifically profitable to pursue this topic.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 07:05 PM
0

I don't believe evo-psych starts from the position that "only men do X". It's actually common base understanding that all continuous traits, like intelligence, strength, aggressiveness, neuroticism, libido, etc. have distributions that overlap between men and women. One common example is competition, which expresses in a particular, overt way in men. That is, men engage much more frequently in overt competition. But this does not mean that women never do that. Of course they do, just significant…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:35 PM
7

That is disgusting. Thornhill and Palmer's book defends that rape is a male evolutionary strategy. IIRC, it was used as source by Steven Pinker and David Buss. Since then, there might have been more research done on this topic. As a hypothesis, it makes some sense. But: sociobiology and evo-psycho is not intrinsically pro men's rights, as I saw some argue. No science is pro- or anti- any rights.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 06:15 PM
1

Funny thing is the opposite is the case. Girls and women look cute and often act silly and are being nice because that evokes strong protective instincts in men.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:04 AM
2

I'm genuinely confused on this one... No, not just on this one. I'm sorry I offended you. No need to be sorry. I don't feel offended.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:28 PM
2

So I am currently writing a piece on how males raised in a patriarchy Oh, so you're writing a fantasy novel. That's nice. unknown perpetrators What does this even mean? wrong demographics about men It's clear that English is not your first language. But: I still look forward to hearing about Is a bit too much, don't you think? patriarchy don't feel comfortable societal expectations centering themselves lived experiences Is it appropriate represented Here we go...
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:16 PM
3

Most of these takes are targeted towards other women. When they hear them, they're less likely to pursue relationships. This means that those who post them have less competition. This works in a smaller group, but in the Age of Internet it became a runaway process, like a fire in a fireside that spread onto the entire house.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 07:06 AM
1

Do you lift?
/r/MensRights31/10/25 07:10 AM
40

UK - The European Capital of Retardation
/r/MensRights27/10/25 12:37 PM
1

OP sees a major source of social problems to be equality. So it's only a natural question to ask, why wouldn't he want to remove that source.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 12:30 PM
-5

To clarify, I am in no way saying women don’t deserve legal protections and recognised equality. Why not?
/r/MensRights27/10/25 09:06 AM
3

Meanwhile Japanese and Korean women: Don't move, maybe he won't notice us!
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:59 AM
1

Learned helplessness
/r/MensRights22/10/25 11:47 AM
1

The very notion of "toxic masculinity" is disgusting. It means that a trait or behavior is considered bad only when a man exhibits it. No one would attack a woman by saying she's exhibiting "toxic masculinity", after all...
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:35 AM
1

Ah, yes, exactly what I needed - a far left woke pro-trans feminist gay man lecturing me about masculinity.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:34 AM
10

I defend myself with how we both know each other's ages. Rookie mistake. You shouldn't defend yourself, because you're not on trial and there is no need for you to defend yourself. These hags aren't owed any explanations. The only proper course of action is to attack and shoot them down immediately. (Verbally, of course [just in case some autistic redditor gets overexcited].) So, a short "fuck off, you goblin" should be enough.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 03:48 PM
1

The picture gets somewhat complicated. Taking estrogen aromatase doesn't bring estrogen to zero, but lowers it (when taking properly). So, it can be used to lower E2 to a healthy level and to optimize the T/E2 ratio. Yes, the inhibitors can have side effects, just like any other medication. Which is why aromatase inhibitors have to be taken in moderate amounts. Further, this medication is used even in cases where there is no TRT involved, to balance T/E2 and together with other meds that increas…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 06:19 AM
0

It actually may lead to excessive levels of estrogen, especially in fat men. It's not uncommon to prescribe aromatize inhibitors in such cases. I don't know what do you understand, but looks like not much.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 06:32 AM
1

Fat creates aromataze that converts testosterone into estrogen. Just giving T to fat men could lead to an even higher levels of estrogen, thus exacerbating their issues.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:12 AM
1

It doesn't matter when divorce became available, because people married in 1976 and divorced in 2020 are still counted. This "divorce rate" is a fake statistic. I sometimes hear people say "oh no! 50% of marriages end up in divorce! The West has fallen!" because they heard some false statistics like in OP. But it's complete nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 06:54 AM
15

"Divorce rate" is a misnomer. It falsifies the picture of what's going on. Consider that in the year 2020, for every 100 marriages there were 85.5 divorces. So, for example, if there were 5 000 marriages, there were 4 275 divorces in 2020. However, it's not the number of divorces linked to marriages from 2020. It was 4 275 divorces from all marriages established in the last 100 years or however long. So, a pair that married in 1974 and divorced in 2020 is counted in the stupid "divorce rate" for…
/r/MensRights20/09/25 08:56 PM
3

Brother, a black man killed a white woman saying "I got that white girl!", when there were 5 other black people (at least, we see 5 blacks in the video). The attacker payed them no attention. I find any mental machinations attempting to whitewash this racist thug by invoking mental illness as disgusting. As if mentally ill schizos can't be racist, and as if it even mattered. It is the thought that racism needs rational coherent ideology that is confused. Since Charlie Kirk and his murderer were …
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:36 PM
0

Hm, I very rarely come across such opinions. Most likely than not, the algorithms feed you precisely the thing you respond to emotionally and watch. I watch other things, so the algos feed me other stuff.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 06:53 PM
18

I see many people not being lonely because they have friends, especially groups of other men, even if they are single.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:41 PM
20

From what I could tell, the attack was motivated by both racism against whites and misogyny against women. It's clear by hearing what the black criminal said, on the full footage. All of the above are the reasons why the leftist media are basically silent about it. But the outrage of most is due to the criminal having being caught 14 times before and allowed to roam the streets until the next crime. People have enough of the leftist complacency and racial double standards (George Floyd vs Iryna …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 07:45 AM
-1

He saved your life - don't squander it.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:24 AM
1

Was there supposed to be a question there?
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:56 AM
11

This is stupid. The term "genocide" has been abused and misused enough already. You can only genocide a population that reproduces itself. There is no group of men that will just prolong itself without women. Just like there is no such thing as a genocide of mathematicians — it's not a self-reproducing population. Similarly with "trans genocide". It's misusing the concepts. And it muddies the waters.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:07 PM
1

Ah, yes, that's exactly what we need: fighting each other in a civil war, while all the legitimate concerns about the gaps in the law and in the institutions fall into the background. A beta scream "destroy those alphas!" as if that was important. Now, I'm thinking OP is a psyop, a feminist in MRA's clothing, trying to derail men. How the fuck did this get over 100 upvotes?...
/r/MensRights04/09/25 11:53 AM
8

The video has a major error. What we are seeing now is sexual selection made clear, not natural selection.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:28 AM
10

It's already happened, Mr Clippy. It's already used like that, as with many other words like "bigot", "transphobe", "fashist", "Nazi".
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:19 AM
-4

That was no joke. No one thought it was a joke. The audience cheered. You can't cheer and laugh at the same time. They weren't laughing... they simply cheered in agreement. Dr K is either disingenuous or naive. Maybe he didn't want to say the truth because the comedian is a Jew and there are growing anti-Jewish sentiments after Israel launched a large scale war against the Palestinians?
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:18 AM
-2

No one here is on their side, dude. Wake up from that psychosis.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 07:48 PM
6

The best way to get an answer is to write what you think you understand. Any errors will certainly get pointed out and corrected.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 07:02 PM
-2

Why post random Internet hate drama here?
/r/MensRights25/08/25 06:55 PM
1

Evolution doesn't care about fun, mate. It's all about optimizing for survival and reproduction.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 11:16 AM
2

I beg to differ. I can easily construct counter hypotheses that seem more reasonable and more plausible than this. Marriage is very advantageous to men because that's the best way to secure a long-term sexual partner. Throughout history, men didn't really have many choices or situations to have relations with many women (or, any women). So, to have a stable romantic and sexual relation, they would be very incentivized to marry. Marriage is one of the best way to secure the chances of bringing up…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 10:38 AM
0

The difference between reproduction strategies are likely not as great as you might think. Humans don't reproduce like gazelles. A human baby is essentially incapable of fending for oneself for years - can't even escape a simple danger. A baby is strongly dependent on the parents for survival. The chances of surviving weren't great in our revolutionary history, and they probably fell close to zero when a parent died. Unless it happened in a tribe and in the times of plenty (so others could easil…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:51 AM
-1

The difference between reproduction strategies are likely not as great as you might think. Humans don't reproduce like gazelles. A human baby is essentially incapable of fending for oneself for years - can't even escape a simple danger. A baby is strongly dependent on the parents for survival. The chances of surviving weren't great in our revolutionary history, and they probably fell close to zero when a parent died. Unless it happened in a tribe and in the times of plenty (so others could easil…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:51 AM
2

I can't access the full paper. I don't know how the study was performed and how were "self-sexualization" and "state safety anxiety" measured. Was one of them through some diagnostic form with verbal questions, thus skewing heavily towards self-report? If so, anxiety could be confused (by the participants as well as by the diagnostic tool used) with excitement, which have some important similarities.
/r/BlackPillScience24/08/25 08:32 AM
6

There already is prenup, which can be disregarded by the court. Why would this be any better?
/r/MensRights24/08/25 06:25 AM
-11

Then, the enemy soldiers would come, and they wouldn't leave the wife and kids alone...
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:59 AM
11

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:06 AM
0

Play stupid games - win stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:56 AM
7

What the fuck is this shit doing here? Is it r/MensRights or r/PinkRelationshipDrama?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:08 PM
3

Whatever biases these AI models have are the biases found in the training data, which is books and the Internet. If course, the producers can skew the model in the later stages by introducing their own biased data (as happened with Google's super-woke image model that generated black Nazis), but it's doubtful people did something like that on purpose in this case.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:21 AM
-1

"Wrong"?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:17 PM
2

This not only doesn't answer the question, but also completely misrepresents what I said. I never said that "nothing matters".
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:22 PM
1

has any other organism inhabiting earth launched itself into space? landed on the moon? collided neutrons at basically light speed? No. So? When humanity eventually goes extinct (as nearly every species that has ever lived on Earth), for whom will it be a problem?
/r/MensRights14/08/25 05:21 PM
1

The problem is, no babies no human race. Where is the problem? When humanity eventually goes extinct (as nearly every species that has ever lived on Earth), for whom will it be a problem? In your text you just assumed that the disappearance of humanity is a grave problem, but you haven't given any reasons to think that. It is such a basic axiom for you that not only you didn't think to scrutinize it yourself, but you assumed that it should be obvious to everyone.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 06:53 AM
1

Why the fuck did you impregnate a cheating abusive psycho?
/r/MensRights08/08/25 11:32 AM
-1

The atheist religion? OK...
/r/MensRights03/08/25 06:40 AM
3

The woke left hate (white) "cis"heteronormative males. It's only natural that pushes some into the opposite direction. You cannot "fix" men's rights spaces, because they are not the cause / source of the thing you don't like.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 06:36 AM
1

in Eastern Europe (...) countries are backward and conservative LOL
/r/MensRights01/08/25 08:33 AM
10

Thankfully, the paper is available through sci-hub. The paper seems to suggest that the genetically determined architecture of the dopamine system leads to both risky (or even criminal) behaviors and sexual activity. Which is not that surprising, as dopamine is the most important neurotransmitter involved in motivation and desire & pursuit (but also in learning and other things). So, if someone has a greater overall tendency to pursue things, then it's likely he will also be pursuing common appe…
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 09:17 AM
1

This would be extremely difficult to pull off. Stop Killing Games initiative went through that route, but they were talked a lot about online, especially in the gamers circles. It took a lot of time to get the signatures, a year to be more specific. https://www.stopkillinggames.com/ https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home What you're suggesting would be even more difficult, because it's not easy to get media coverage.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:55 AM
4

Cool story, but the racial component hasn't been mentioned in your OP. And this does not track the general claims you made in the OP that "Top-tier men to be legally vulnerable. Low-tier men to stay sexually relevant". You literally just switched the topic...
/r/BlackPillScience28/07/25 04:49 PM
6

But here’s the kicker: When subsidized, low-income men (especially from politically protected groups) commit actual violent rape, feminists often say nothing. Why? Because modern feminism is about equality of outcome — even in sex. They want: Low-status men to still get laid High-status men to be controlled, shamed, or punished What delusion is this?... This entire argument makes no sense and is not based on the reality we currently live in. EDIT: Fixed wording (that -> what).
/r/MensRights28/07/25 09:37 AM
22

Meanwhile, if a low-status, politically protected man engages in actual violence or coercion, society says: “Let’s not stereotype.” “Be culturally sensitive.” “Not all men.” Why? Because modern feminism isn’t about fairness or safety — it’s about control and enforced equality. Feminists want: Top-tier men to be legally vulnerable Low-tier men to stay sexually relevant What delusion is this?... This entire argument makes no sense and is not based on the reality we currently live in. EDIT: Fixed w…
/r/BlackPillScience28/07/25 09:36 AM
1

There is waaay too much difference in age, weight, lighting, Photoshop, and makeup between the "before" and "after" photos to make any reasonable determinations. Also, how is it about men's *rights*?
/r/MensRights27/07/25 08:00 AM
-13

This is actually extremely poor. There is no "Asian race". There are huge differences between Koreans, Indonesians, and Indians, for example. Lumping such disparate groups of people into a single box is worse than useless — it muddies the picture.
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/25 01:12 PM
10

The study falsifies one particular bias due to the halo effect.
/r/BlackPillScience29/05/25 07:49 PM
4

This doesn't mean much when we don't know what is your age (so can't infer what is the age of women that like you on the dating app). It's pretty well known that younger women have a different approach to dating than older women.
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/25 08:27 AM
2

But how is this connected to blackpill?
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 06:30 AM
3

But what does it have to do with black pill?
/r/BlackPillScience17/04/25 04:32 AM
2

In general, pupils dilate as an effect of general (not only sexual) arousal. Throughout millions of years of the existence of homo genus and before, women were often taken by force. So, they evolved a preparatory response, which includes genital arousal (swelling and production of fluids), which prepares them for a potential, even if not wanted, sexual encounter, so as to protect the body. This doesn't necessarily mean that a given woman is sexually interested. And of course, this is just one ev…
/r/BlackPillScience12/03/25 09:46 AM
15

You are imagining things... Snap out of it!
/r/BlackPillScience02/03/25 06:52 AM
27

Native Swedes should be much taller than many kinds of immigrants. There is probably over 1/4 of people of foreign background living in Sweden. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Sweden
/r/BlackPillScience31/01/25 10:28 AM
14

Because it's not r/BlackPillAnectodes
/r/BlackPillScience07/12/24 05:06 PM
25

[citation needed]
/r/BlackPillScience07/12/24 04:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter