TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WaffleKing110 Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by WaffleKing110 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Thanks for sharing that video. It’s new to me and is very enlightening
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 10:53 AM
5

It isn’t? I’m from a fairly liberal town but “gay” hasn’t been used commonly as an insult here for like 5-10 years really
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/23 11:01 AM
1

I agree
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 06:27 PM
1

I don’t take issue with it personally, but my experiences in this genre were with a non-binary femme individual, so not exactly a female. I don’t really think it matters, but I’m also not generally one to put much weight into those sorts of labels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 05:59 PM
1

I never said you were stupid, 15, or that you didn’t support representation. Nothing to apologize for.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 11:21 PM
1

A) Nobody is forcing anybody to be in STEM. Not sure where that came from. This is meant to encourage female students. B) 50/50 representation doesn’t happen without taking measures to create it. Again, I’m not saying that these are the right measures, but they shouldn’t be denied outright. C) I was in PoliSci, which luckily had a decent split of professors. If every single one of my professors and GSIs had been women (or all men for that matter) I would’ve felt pretty weird about my classes. No…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 10:37 PM
1

None of what you said about the nature of women’s studies classes has anything to do with my comment or this discussion. Regardless of your opinions on them, it wouldn’t make sense for them to be taught by an entirely male staff. Say what you will about the hiring of specifically female staff for STEM classes, the most common complaint about engineering classes that I heard from the female students at my university was that every professor they had was a man. They considered it a huge turnoff to…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:45 PM
1

I don’t know enough about the issue to take a stance, so I’m playing Devil’s Advocate here: One huge objective of colleges (in the US at least) is to encourage more women to join STEM type fields in order to shrink the gap between then number of men and women in those professions. Women are more likely to take those classes if they see that women can succeed in the field, which tenured professors surely have. Another possible reason could be for “women’s studies” type classes, where it would mak…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 07:03 PM
4

I don’t remember the title but I’m pretty sure it was not that.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:50 PM
19

Tequila Mockingbird is an actual book. It’s a cocktail book where each drink is a literary reference. It has a sequel.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:01 PM
1

Going to university doesn’t exempt you in the US. I signed up at 18 (people came to our high school and all the boys had to sign up then and there) and graduated from university a week ago. Everybody saying “We cOUlD Be DrAfTeD aT AnY MomENt” is freaking out over nothing cause we won’t be, but the principle of it is still worth pushing against
/r/MensRights12/05/19 12:27 PM
1

I never said a single thing about any implied insult to women. In fact, I don’t even know what implied insult it is you’re talking about. Don’t assume I have certain stances on issues I’ve never even brought up. I haven’t offered an opinion on circumcision, so its not really something you could draw a comparison about anyway. I don’t understand what it is that’s so confusing about this post. Plenty of people are fine with male genital mutilation. That is their opinion. It clearly is NOT Cher’s. …
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:02 PM
1

...what?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:31 PM
1

Well then that’s your opinion. I disagree.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:30 PM
1

How does that ruin the point she is trying to make? And in what way am I being a hypocrite? The point of Cher’s tweet is that everything she listed should be illegal, and so should anything meant to control what women do with their bodies. Whether or not it is legal doesn’t change her viewpoint that it shouldn’t be.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:29 PM
1

No, people are complaining that Cher actually believes these things should be true. Whether or not they actually are true doesn’t change the fact that Cher’s stance is what they are complaining about, and Cher’s stance in this tweet is sarcastic. I don’t think it’s anything unheard of to speak about male genital mutilation in this way when people are okay with discussing abortion in similar manners. Is it good? No. Is it outside the norm? Also no.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:26 PM
1

Dawg you’re trying to argue the intricacies of gender politics with me. I don’t care. All I’m saying is the tweet is sarcastic and people are complaining like it’s real. You’re welcome to complain about the contents of the tweet not making sense, but I don’t know why you’re debating that with me.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:07 PM
0

The point is that it’s a woman trying to control what men can and can’t do with their bodies, whether that’s mutilation, forced birth control, etc. it’s not about specific issues, it’s about having control over one’s own body. Plus, currently there are plenty of male politicians trying to take away abortion rights from women. Whether or not they have the rights doesn’t change the fact that it’s still considered an issue.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:59 PM
1

Yeah this is a bit ridiculous. The whole point is that if the content of this post upsets you, so should the regulation of women’s bodies. Not that this post should be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:54 AM
3

It’s okay to say it could be viewed differently by different victims. Some guys may not care. Some guys will. Lots of girls will be traumatized. Some won’t. You can’t say that it’s different for guys. It’s different for some.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:45 PM
4

This guy needs to learn to speak for himself and not his entire fucking gender. As a dude who’s had a similar situation go a bit farther (and way too far at the time) than him, he doesn’t fucking get to speak for me. He doesn’t get to say “Hey gals its totally fine ti sexually assault us dudes “cause most of us are fine with it.” Its shit like this that causes harmful double standards to come forward in the first place. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:42 PM
2

I would argue you’re underthinking. Your “males are magnificent” statement is a gross generalization along the same lines as “All black people are criminals” or “All women are sexist.” A generalization is automatically applied to everyone it encompasses, that’s why they’re a problem.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:37 PM
1

Perhaps “evidence” wasn’t the right word. “Argumentation” or “talking points” would work better, but either way, OP refuses to respond to actual sentiments in this thread, his responses ignore the arguments and repeat his own remarks over and over. If you want actual evidence I posted a long comment (on mobile so I’m not sure if it’s up or down) with an ABC talking point format. The B point in particular is evidence of why OP’s argument is incorrect. I’ve also received a couple responses from OP…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:34 PM
2

This all makes sense to me. While I agree with a lot of the sentiments posted in this sub, I also tend to have some very different viewpoints from most of its subscribers, and I try to avoid getting into arguments when they specifically involve gender conflict, feminism, etc. So this time around I figured this was one of the few debates I was actually willing to have here, and took the opportunity.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:28 PM
2

For the record, I appreciate the willingness to have an actual debate rather than mindlessly screeching at one another or repeating the same lines over and over with no actual support for your arguments. It’s refreshing.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:02 AM
1

That’s a pretty gross generalization. You’re saying that these people feel bad about being men. And then somebody tells them that it’s not wrong to be a man... and that makes it worse? If they already feel bad about being a man, then how can telling them it isn’t bad be harmful to them? And I wouldn’t say I agree with that being how the mind works. Sure, if I was told in an earnest conversation that its okay to be a man, my mind would consider the possibilities of why it wouldn’t be okay, but th…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:38 AM
2

Could you respond to the rest of the comment? Every one of your replies here is just a simple formula of “ignore what the person said and repeat your own thoughts.”
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:35 AM
1

Like I said, it’s a moot comparison in the context of this debate. I personally don’t want to be praised for something I haven’t earned, and I have never encountered a situation in which good work or deeds would never be praised again. I’ve donated to homeless people without receiving praise, I’ve helped people passed out drunk get back to their houses or at least to safe place and never received thanks, and I guess if I was forced to choose I would take that over being given emphatic praise I d…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:26 AM
3

...your point is? That just existing is wondrous? Are we handing out medals for being born now? “Congratulations! You took your first breath!” I feel like our standards must be pretty goddamn low.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:23 AM
0

That hypothetical is nothing related to what’s happening here. I don’t like either option obviously, and life isn’t a choice between them. People who do good receive praise for doing good all the damn time, from friends, family, coworkers, etc. it’s not a choice between “accept this weird dude throwing praise at everyone no matter who they are or what the’ve done” and “never receive praise again.”
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:16 AM
3

AGAIN there is a difference between kindness and praise. And either way I think your examples aren’t very good. You could easily argue that these people earn their praise (or kindness) by enduring the hardships they face. If you live on the streets for a year I’ll praise you for your resilience. It’s been earned. If you’re born with a penis I’m not gonna praise you for that. Sure, some people do just need some kindness, and some people don’t have a problem with others projecting their emotions o…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:13 AM
1

A) the world isn’t sorted into negative and positive people and to simplify into such is a grand mistake. B) OP isn’t praising for being a good person, or for being a supporter of men’s rights. He’s doling out praise for being men. One of the problems I have with this statement is that it automatically offers praise on a meritless basis to people who decidedly should not be praised. I’ve got a family friend. He has three sons and was the primary income of his household for over 20 years. When he…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:05 AM
2

Again, it’s not about kind words. I don’t know exactly what it is you mean to imply when you say I would prefer negativity. As a man that takes strong offense when people criticize men for being men, that seems like a pretty egregious accusation to make without evidence. And to be honest, this guy’s creepy insistence on repeating and emphasizing a single message no matter how many speak up with contrary evidence is fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:46 AM
2

Like I just said, it’s got nothing to do with feminism. There’s a difference between kindness and unearned praise. My problem isn’t with people showing kindness, it’s with a group of people I identify with being giving praise on a meritless basis. Being a man isn’t praiseworthy. Praise is earned, and your biological sex is not. It’s as simple as that.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:44 AM
2

...but still worse than a lack of false reinforcement. It’s really easy to not falsely reinforce a negative. Why are we going out of our way to promote false positive reinforcement.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:28 AM
2

Being male isn’t a flaw. Sure. I agree. By the same logic, being male isn’t a praiseworthy trait. It’s a fact, nothing more, nothing less. If you can’t criticize someone for being male, how can you congratulate them for it?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:26 AM
2

“This” being the expectation that people earn praise instead of it being given by default? This entire post had nothing to do with women or with their praise. I don’t want this guy praising me if I haven’t earned it, and I don’t want ours to become a society of praising people for being born a certain way, instead of for acting a certain way.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:23 AM
3

I disagree. Wonderful is not a given. It’s earned. There’s nothing wondrous about just existing. Males are not wondrous by default. Nobody is. Your responses in this thread sound like some sort of cult/brainwashing thing, even if I didn’t wholeheartedly disagree it comes across as very creepy
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:21 AM
2

There are plenty of people out there that are wonderful and happen to be men. Being a man doesn’t make you wonderful, just like being a woman doesn’t make someone wonderful. I know way too many men that definitely are not wonderful, regardless of them being men, to take this bull seriously.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:34 PM
5

Yeah, but being male doesn’t make you wonderful. Everybody, male, female, or otherwise needs to earn that. Having a dick doesn’t make you a great person, just like it doesn’t make you a horrible person.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:31 PM
16

I mean if you drink a few brewskis and then rape someone... yeah
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:53 PM
1

All of these make sense to me. I explained to the other guys I was speaking with that in a country where circumcision is not the norm, someone may be bullied for being circumcised. I live in the US where a hefty majority is circumcised. I admitted that the problem here is with the people and society that shun those who are different. But still a parent may not want to hand those bullies more ammunition by not having the circumcision done (in a place like the US where it’s the norm). Just to be s…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:14 PM
1

I don’t understand how you don’t understand the first point. You said before reading my entire comment “oh so we are just going to ignore all the points I made. Cool.” I very obviously did not do this, as I then replied point-by-point. That is the behavior I refer to here as immature. For your second point, it is illegal to cut people randomly. It is not illegal to perform legally sanctioned surgeries on a patient. I understand that you believe this circumcision surgery should be illegal. I am n…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:03 PM
1

Your first response: exact same as your responses to the rape topics discussion earlier. Responded to invalidate my argument without reading it. Again, very mature of you. Your second response, I straight up have no idea what you’re saying. The medical classification of a surgery is not the same thing as the classification of a crime. You see circumcision as a crime. It’s a crime whether or not it’s classified as cosmetic then. “Because they seemingly don’t kowtow to bullies that you’ve based yo…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:27 PM
1

It must be nice being able to devolve an adult conversation to insults and still feel good about yourself. The fact that it’s classified as a cosmetic surgery doesn’t change the fact that it definitively is not in reality a cosmetic surgery. It’s classification doesn’t matter because it doesn’t have any bearing on the intent of the procedure. When I say “rape (not rare) topics I mean my references to ruffees and being raped while unconscious. You referenced my statements by quoting them and imme…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:00 PM
1

A) how does classification as a cosmetic surgery matter in any way? It doesn’t change the actual goal of the surgery nor does it change what happens during it. Classifying it as cosmetic doesn’t magically make this sexual assault. B) Quotes. C) “You haven’t been listening very hard.” You haven’t explained it. How am I supposed to understand something that you haven’t explained? D) What world are we talking about here? Are you trying to put this in the context of the entire planet? Because the le…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:25 PM
1

Performing a surgery on a sexual organ is not the same thing as fondling genitals. You are doing a really great job of cherry picking information while missing the point. Like quoting me about the rape topics and then criticizing me for the exact thing I avoided saying. I’m sorry that you found the surgery so traumatizing, but I’m not entirely sure I understand how or why. Circumcision is done by most people because it is the “normal” thing to do now. Circumcised people are more common, and as s…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:31 PM
1

But “logical inconsistency” in this case is according to your definition and opinion. By that logic your reply makes you logically inconsistent. Your opinion doesn’t make logical inconsistency apply any more than mine makes it null.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:41 PM
1

People bully those who they perceive as different. On this day and age, unfortunately lack of circumcision is different. That caused the bullying. Eliminate that factor and the bullying doesn’t happen. The bullying, of course, is the problem here, but again all I’m saying is that I personally am glad I was circumcised. Do you know (of) people who are actually traumatized by their circumcision procedure? Keep in mind there’s a huge difference between wishing it hadn’t happened and being traumatiz…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:40 PM
0

Logical inconsistency only applies if you equate rape with circumcision. In my opinion the two aren’t the same thing, so his logic is just fine.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:13 PM
-2

There are a couple significant differences. One of them being that there is no benefit to being raped. There are benefits to circumcision. Cleaning is less work for example. I’ve mentioned issues with bullying in a few comments. Because one is socially acceptable and the other isn’t I feel like trauma is not really formed around being circumcised. I’m sure there’s a few sparse examples, I don’t mean to diminish that, I’m just saying people who are raped or sexually assaulted find the experience …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:51 AM
-7

I know of several people who were bullied in middle school swim class because their penises looked weird (read: were not circumcised). I know two people who were bullied off the high school swim and water polo teams for the same reason. I know one who was pretty popular until his popular girlfriend started spreading rumors that his dick wasn’t snipped, and another who got made fun of in class because he got the surgery and had to take days out of school for it. Again this is my personal opinion,…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:11 AM
-3

Because I know several people who weren’t circumcised. And were bullied in swim class. I also just don’t see the advantages of bot having it circumcised. It’s literally just more work.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:03 AM
0

I agree that it’s hypocritical and a problem, but this one’s a bit if a grey area for me. Personally I’m really glad I’m circumcised and I’m glad it happened before I could start making memories. At the same time I understand some people prefer the opposite. Edit: jesus people, it’s personal opinions. a community like this needs to be able to hear things they don’t agree with and act maturely about it if they want to be taken seriously
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter