TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Waffleradio Archive

View 1 posts and 25 comments by Waffleradio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Waffleradio/r/askTRP25/12/15 11:36 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

Right, and that's why the other games have been historically accurate.... yes... Remember that part of Battlefield where you cowered in a hole for 49 hours without sleep, and the game made you simulate liquid shits and growing all kinds of nasty fungus on your feet cause you didn't get the resources to upgrade your boots early in the campaign? Then you guarded a boring logistics depot for like 7 weeks before getting shot in the arm in the first 10 seconds of combat, falling on the ground and the…
/r/MGTOW04/11/18 11:27 PM
1

Idk about any of this but what does MGTOW stand for
/r/MGTOW09/11/17 07:30 AM
1

I was actually just curious how TRP would respond to a science query that I felt applied to their philosophy. Most felt it didn't, and a few just argued with me about wolves. That's about it really.
/r/askTRP28/12/15 07:00 PM
0

That's not what this post is about, no. It's about science, and whether it's a part of the alpha/beta thing. Most answers I got suggest not. It's just a convenient term for better/worse, and that's all. That's it. So I don't know what you're on about except bragging about the amount of women that "some of you" sleep with.
/r/askTRP27/12/15 10:16 PM
0

A legitimate answer. Thanks for your input.
/r/askTRP26/12/15 05:17 AM
1

Never said they weren't. Newsflash: the animal kingdom is incredibly diverse with regard to the social hierarchies within it. "Being animals" doesn't really mean shit, except in terms of biology.
/r/askTRP26/12/15 04:45 AM
1

I mean yeah TRP does seem pretty fixated on some kind of "animal kingdom" analogy or justification for the whole philosophy. But I don't know where you're getting this obsession thing from. Definitely not me, I never mentioned an obsession. I asked about wolves specifically because "alpha/beta" comes specifically from wolf studies. Those studies, and the alpha/beta paradigm they suggested, are scientifically defunct. I'm curious about whether the alpha/beta terminology is linked to the whole ani…
/r/askTRP26/12/15 04:21 AM
0

Not when there are Multiple Wolves in the Pact he even describes this in his own video from the link provided and even states at that time you can call them an Alpha. What doesn't happen when there are multiple wolves in the pack? Not sure what you're saying. His point is that alpha implies something-- taking power by force or conflict. That's not how wolf packs work, so to make things clear, terminology was changed. That was all explained on his page and in the quotes I put here for ease of rea…
/r/askTRP26/12/15 04:12 AM
1

I'm not. You guys started using the alpha/beta terminology. Likely due to it's role in pop culture, which stems from the 1970's wolf research which coined the term "alpha male." Here... are just a few TRP posts regarding wolves in some way or making wolf analogies. I tried to pick relevant ones, but I also am not going to search that hard. So you are still answering the question: alpha/beta as TRP uses them have nothing to do with science or nature--instead it's just common terminology meaning "…
/r/askTRP26/12/15 03:51 AM
1

Bold claims, no backup. I'll assume you're wrong. Don't know what else you expected.
/r/askTRP26/12/15 03:43 AM
1

What is the difference between calling the "Dominant Breeder" an Alpha? Dominant breeders are dominant due to parentage. Subordinate breeders is just what we call any other wolves in the pack who do breed. We call them that because they are offspring of the dominant breeders. and not because they are somehow socially inferior. A Mech quote (emphasis mine) to illustrate: "Alpha" implies competing with others and becoming top dog by winning a contest or battle. However, most wolves who lead packs …
/r/askTRP26/12/15 01:38 AM
1

See this is really long, but I am just going to say that you've got it wrong off the starting line. Today, women are educated, they can vote, they can work the same jobs as men, and have all of the same rights men do. Feminism should be over. Mission accomplished. We have equal rights. Sure, there will always be bigots and haters, just like we still have people who hate blacks or jews or arabs, but those are marginal loony tunes that everybody laughs at. Women and men have equal rights. Feminism…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 03:56 AM
1

I was criticising your lack of real data and inclusion only of anecdotes! Not the anecdotes themselves. I thought they were amusing definitely, and you certainly have an interesting chess opponent. But it took some other poster gathering links to get actual data so that was a weakness of the original submission. Edit: should say that I originally thought that meant you were kind of an unreasonable poster, which inspired the tone and intensity of my original post. So my apologies for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:37 PM
1

No no, of course that's ridiculous. I would likely bring up supply and demand when discussing that. I really ought to get off mobile.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:35 PM
2

They may be true, but statistical significance requires more rigour. There are quantifiable differences, but you didn't base the post around that data. I think it did take me a bit to realize exactly your point: "scarcity amplifies gender differences." I think that's a point worth investigating, but I vote we use scholarly resources and data that can be tested and compared!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:32 PM
1

Yeah I hit that tangent pretty hard though eh? I will refer you to my reply later in the thread, but my reason for ignoring all the stuff about homeless people is given around here somewhere--the data you base your conclusions on is not sufficient or telling in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:25 PM
1

Yes it was perhaps a tirade. I felt it important to establish certain baselines about the capabilities of men and women. I didn't respond much to the latter portions. because I thought your anecdotal evidence pretty lacking. Down in this part of the thread, someone was kind enough to post some data, and we can discuss some things of significance. Sorry to get snippy and say "fix it" but I hate the excuse "its just how I am bro, its my style". It pisses me right off. I know you didn't mean it lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:23 PM
1

So your point is that scarcity amplifies gender differences. Ok, interesting enough. I don't feel that excerpt really says much conclusively. It's a small geographic area for one. That's minor. I'd say that the crux of my disagreement is that we aren't comparing the homeless population to one with the luxury you speak of. I think men are more likely to use narcotics in those populations too (could be wrong). See what I'm saying? This difference might not be due to scarcity at all. Edit: and to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:15 PM
3

You were pretty biased in your wording. If you want to write meaningful debates, fix it. It may be "your style" but this isn't art school.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 08:10 PM
2

Regardless of what you have observed in a tiny, statistically insignificant sample of the homeless population... I see homeless women often enough. I see them begging too. They are certainly there. Does that say anything meaningful? No, unfortunately. If you want to make large statements, they must be appropriately sourced. Anecdotal evidence of "I seen some homeless dudes but naht the wimmins" just doesn't cut it for anything but.... Anecdotes! But really homeless people are there for a variety…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 07:58 PM
2

Uh, this whole "women can do just as much as men today" thing. I am a man and I stopped reading after the first few arguments (sigh then I went back and read the whole damn thing). You know who works the fields in Rwanda? The women. You know what's a big problem there? The men have no jobs and just squander the money on beer. They don't have machines. It isn't modern industry that has equalized men and women. Its biology. We have some physical differences, but to say we have significantly differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/14 07:51 PM
-10

Is it really? I don't understand how that is. My understanding is that feminism started as a movement for equal women's rights in an era that clearly lacked them. That era has dwindled, but there are a lot of ways we humans misunderstand and mistreat each other. I'd say the lines of feminism and other social issues (race for example) have blurred into a semi-contiguous unit that seeks to equalize a playing field long dominated by wealthy white males. I don't have a problem with that. Edit: so th…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:40 PM
1

Define this threshold of difficulty you speak of.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:32 PM
-9

Why does feminism need to be eviscerated? Why not just do what she likes? Because if you start eviscerating, you're an eviscerator and eventually someone will believe the only way they can be free to do what they like is to eviscerate your movement.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:24 PM
2

I thought this was going to be a link to a recent well written article about sexual assault statistics and their changing nature over time. It made a point of noting new data suggesting male rape is more common than previously measured (partially due to how our measurements have changed). It was written by a well noted feminist (the article about the study). I was quite disappointed. The top comment on imgur sums up any response I would have. Stop this silly nonsense about men vs. women and let'…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter