TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wagnersh Archive

View 2 posts and 90 comments by Wagnersh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't see a problem with a backup record of threads. It doesn't have any negative impact on genuine discussions and has no use outside of fucking over trolls from AMR. Perhaps Im wrong but that's my opinion about that particular item. Actively censoring topics like the mods are doing lately is far more harmful and destructive. They still haven't explained why they should remove popular upvoted topics that the community wants to discuss based on their biased value judgements. They haven't expla…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:18 AM
1

And you can say that as much as you like. That's your opinion. Your opinion is that sex work is different from dangerous work or dirty work in some qualitative way that means women should be specially protected from it that men should not be protected from dangerous or dirty work, but you don't give evidence other than circular moral reasoning. Further it wouldn't even matter if you were right or wrong. You forcibly shut down all discussion on it. Others have different opinions. What the mods di…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:12 AM
1

I'm against women voting because men built this civilization so only men should control it. If women want power rather than forcibly taking over male institutions with help from manginas they need to build their own institutions own clubs own civilization. An example of this is how women are trying to destroy the male only study groups in college right now. As for them holding jobs Im not sure what you mean by that exactly as there are several different positions within that and you could be mis…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:58 AM
2

And look at this: Self Posts: Due to the possibility of eliciting sympathy and then changing the text of a self post, we now have a bot set up to keep a record of the initial submission of a self post. Users shouldn't feel the need to have to do this any longer. If you see content copied that really must be removed (for example: child porn links, personal information) then please message the /r/MensRights moderators so we can also remove it from the copy post also. It's just so demeaning. There'…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:51 AM
1

If we kill your post (likely upvote farm or clickbait) as off topic, you can SELF POST it starting a discussion as to WHY your link is on the topic of mens rights, and it will be allowed to persist, provided you provide a substantial link to the MRM. When my thread was killed I was not told I could do this. I was just told I was wrong. So I did not do this.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:47 AM
1

you are litterally the only four who have voiced any concerns with mod decsions in the last six months This is not true. I had a thread deleted recently and complained. Also I really doubt that the true number is what you state it as. You likely artificially lower the true number of those dissatisfied by mod censorship by conflating that with those who have seen the complaints process through to the end. Most people you censor likely don't bother to complain about it. instead of silencing you an…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:42 AM
2

I agree that there seems to be, especially of late, a more heavy handed moderation policy form the mods. Why cannot the community decide what they want to see and upvote and downvote accordingly? If its popular then the community will promote it with votes and comments and traffic and if its not popular then the community will cause it to disappear. Obviously vote rigging and manipulation can be dealt with by moderators but it should rarely require outright removal of topics or comments. I perso…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:36 AM
9

What extra responsibility do mothers have? That they shit the kids out? Rather the mother has less responsibilities and more choices through abortion and the fact men always have to pay for children without the choice of abortion.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:07 AM
8

Save the fact most of these care arrangements are private mostly done because the mother simply cannot cope being a parent all the time as well as drink mamosas with her girlfriends and so while care is being offloaded the father is treated as a free baby sitter rather than an equal parent. So why don't the fathers tell the authorities? Simple. The mothers would end the informal care arrangements because it would begin costing them money that is CS money. The fathers are so desperate for their c…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:06 AM
7

I like this comment on article: Today's DM representation of women: knickerless with vaginal infections, who think they deserve their children more than their estranged male partners, with a sprinkling of desperate to be famous for their fake boobs and faces.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 07:58 AM
11

You can indeed approach people in public talk to them and take photos of them without their permission. You describing this as harassment is an unsupported assumption.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:54 AM
2

How is it an ad hom to point out your fallacy? Calling ad hom here is the fallacy of argument from fallacy.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:52 AM
1

there has been no mistake made If you say so. The fact you are unable to openly admit your mistake despite continuous efforts to justify it tells me all I need to know about your level of maturity I'm done talking to you. Have the last word if you feel the need. I'll let you have it, out of pity.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:49 AM
3

Also, goodbye forever /r/MensRights circlejerk! You're worse than all of them. We will still be here when one day you need your rights and don't have them. Come back then. It's a pity you cannot care about other men and their rights though.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:42 AM
4

Whatever you think of her behavior, his other comments have suggested a pretty unsettling sense of entitlement. You use that word as if he doesn't/didn't have the entitlement to take the photos but you are wrong. You can photograph anything and anyone in public with or without permission.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:38 AM
2

If you say so buddy. BTW you are guilty of using the fallacious fallacy.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:05 AM
2

Untrue and irrelevant. Untrue because my opinion is that the nation is a concept or entity that is not a person and nothing is more valuable than a person therefore people should not ever be sacrificed for the 'nation' or 'national security' or 'the greater good' or anything else, especially against their will. I personally would not answer the draft and would leave to Canada immediately. I would not risk my life for a matriarchal feminist state whose values I disagree with. Secondly this is irr…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 11:02 PM
1

I know but it has become irrelevant due to time factor. You are not censoring me specifically as far as I am aware, you censored a specific topic. The reason I say you did so wrongly is because the topic was receiving upvotes from the community and so was clearly a popular topic with support. It is fine to censor trolls illegal stuff and maybe hate material but if the community has already decided in a democratic fashion that a topic is worthy and popular to discuss in men's rights then why shou…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 10:47 PM
1

They are not forced to work in brothels as prostitutes because there is no excess demand for male prostitutes. You cannot say whether or not they would be forced to work in brothels if demand existed because you don't know. All that can be said is that there exists legal protection for women in this area but not for men, and that further men are continually forced into dangerous dirty jobs without exemption, (except it seems in Australia according to another poster.) In Germany and other countri…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:13 AM
1

Any protection women get that men don't get is special by nature of it being limited to a single gender. Are you really just arguing about the wording I used aka 'special' or are you saying it's okay for women to have rights and protections men don't have?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:15 AM
1

Possibly. In some situations. Though I'd not think a none year old scared for life over potential mens rea issues they likely fail to even understand.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:40 AM
1

And that's the point of my OP that women get special protections in this sphere not available to men.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:38 AM
3

In studies of animals given the opportunity to self-administer intravenous doses of cocaine or heroin, females began self-administration sooner than males and administered larger amounts of the drugs. women are less successful than men in quitting smoking and have higher relapse rates after they do quit. Treatment involving nicotine replacement therapy-nicotine gum or patch-works better for men than for women. https://archives.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol15N4/Tearoff.html To all the posters he…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:35 AM
2

There is a huge difference between male and female drug addicts particularly the ones addicted to meth or the opiates. A man can be a high functioning drug addict who has his life together and his addiction under control. I have never once encountered a high functioning female drug addict and the male and female drug addicts I knew the difference between them and the different rate of decay was astounding.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:24 AM
3

Especially not homeless mentally I'll drug addicts. I would've vomited. But this forum is mostly male and the problem with male rights is that most males are biased too wards females while most females are also biased towards females. Even here that pro female bias shows.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:14 AM
4

Funny thing is that in public that nine year old would be deemed traumatised but that same nine year old probably saw heaps of peckers of all ages and colours at any public urinal. How did seeing a pecker out in the open from a distance scar him for life but seeing it right up next to him in the toilet not scar him?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:08 AM
4

Women become ten times the drug fiend as a male drug addict does.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:04 AM
1

The way you've written this is that she refused a legitimate job while unemployed However she refused a job in a brothel. those are two completely different things Not really because as per the law in Germany work in a brothel is a legitimate job.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 12:54 AM
0

My 2 boys see a private therapist What did you do to them?!!
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:58 AM
-1

and let women have a say in how its run. Why? I don't get it! I think its something to do with that hideous invention called chivalry and the pedestaling of women as a result, all the fault of manginas and white knights. Ancient Athens had a better idea. They all turned homosexual. Women had the Athenian government force men to marry them and husbands to fuck them, at pain of a fine. (Literally if a husband did not have sex with his wife at a certain frequency his wife could petition the state a…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:52 AM
6

Sounds like something a feminist would say: 'After the feminist laughed it off and referenced that it was only a boy' Actually I'm fairly sure feminists have said that. I remember it somewhere.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:47 AM
1

swimming in shit isn't the same thing as getting fucked That I think is a matter of perspective. I know which one Id rather be doing.... which would basically be government enforced rape If that was true then taking away my benefits for refusing any job at all is government enforced slavery. No one is 'forcing' anyone to do anything. They are (or rather would be) simply not handing them cash. If not handing someone cash is rape, then think about all the people you and I have raped today. Actuall…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:36 AM
1

Wow. Australia is weird. When I was on benefits many years ago I was called into the agency and my case manager sat down with me and talked about this job she had advertised picking vegetables (I think cucumbers). This was despite the fact when registering with them I specifically said that the job I most despise in the world is picking vegetables and fruit. I reminded them of this. They asked if I wanted to do the job or not. I said do I have any choice and my manager went and spoke to the supe…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:32 AM
1

would we as men be happy Society has never cared about that. As you say we are 'forced' to take up jobs far more dangerous than prostitution. I suspect if there was demand for male prostitutes men would be forced into them while women would not. Society has never shied away from the use and abuse of men, unlike the fetishized levels of protection for women. To be totally honest, not that it effects this argument, I would be a prostitute if there was any demand for males. There isn't so my dream …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:31 AM
1

exemption for vegetarians who don't want to work in a meat factory lol I did not know that. wow. I don't know how I feel about that whether such exemptions are a good idea or a bad idea and I can see arguments from both sides. At least though Australia is being a bit more fair in allowing some exemptions for males instead of just females so good on them in that way I suppose. Does Australia allow other exemptions say teetotalers not wanting to do bar work or personal exemptions like someone who …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:45 AM
3

His first mistake was to be born black. Then he made it worse by making a second mistake in being born as a man. His third and final mistake was consorting with females. 3 strikes and you're out don't you know?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:20 AM
3

Take this to your parents. If this was happening in my sons school I would deal with it. Your parents will be able to get a lawyer to write a letter that is notice of intention to sue the school over discrimination and this threat will be enough to make them capitulate.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:10 AM
3

Society and law in many countries and especially Germany has determined that prostitution, stripping, and incidental jobs in adult entertainment businesses are ordinary jobs subject to the same rights regulations insurance and so on that every other job gets. There are lots of jobs men might not like doing or feel bad doing. I once did a job where I had to scuba dive (in a drysuit and helmet) into a pond of shit (from an effluent station). Literally swimming in shit. Another time I was on benefi…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:51 AM
1

Lets put it this way. Had he not been massively abused by a psychotic feminist mother as a child he probably wouldn't have become psychotic.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:30 AM
5

A 1983 report states: "Anders is a victim of his mother's projections of paranoid-aggressive and sexual fears toward men in general", and "she projects onto him her own primitive, aggressive and sexual fantasies; all the qualities in men that she regards as dangerous and aggressive." Sounds like the basis of feminism. In fact his mother was a feminist. Feminism is harmful to children.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:48 AM
4

How can a person be born evil? Its not possible. People become evil as they grow up, because of the way they are raised. I can prove this by referring you to the evil things done by child soldiers. These child soldiers are taken from their families and taught to be evil to butcher people horrifically and so on. Evil (which by the way is a subjective thing and not a real property of any living thing or non living thing) or rather the ability to do evil things is part of our inherent nature of all…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:37 AM
2

She damaged him mentally and caused him to become a psychopath. So yeah it is her fault. It is also the fault of the feminist gynocentric culture that allowed his mother to continue to damage him.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:33 AM
1

Opposed by feminists and republicans. Why don't they get in bed already...
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:29 AM
17

an unfaithful husband I don't blame BC for that.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:20 AM
10

If HC leads the Dems I will vote republican for the first time in my life to help stop this woman. The neo tradcons (feminists) are worse than the tradcons
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:18 AM
1

We are not smarter because of bigger heads... We are smarter because of larger more complex brains with more neurons and connections. (Brain to body size ratio has no effect on intelligence whatsoever. There is correlation between this ratio and intelligence but ZERO causation. This got turned into a popular but false myth. Otherwise if it were true getting fat would make you less smart. Then losing weight would make you smarter again.) But more neurons and connections requires physical space to…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:55 PM
0

Can two species become one species?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:30 AM
1

Male and female was invented a long time before our ape like ancestors were around. Male and female was around before the dinosaurs. In fact if I remember right male and female was invented when our ancestors were all flatworms swimming round in the sea with no skeletons. Back then there was no male or female. There are two possibilities. Either one of those hermaphrodite or asexual flatworms split into two species closely related enough to exchange DNA and one of those species took on the male …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:24 AM
2

That is what the studies, that I am familiar with, suggest. Further that the male average (the middle) is higher than the female average.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:41 AM
3

Every study I have seen suggests that men, on average, have between 5 and 10 iq points on women, and this is post the adjustment of IQ tests to cater to women, (much like the US military is currently lowering their entry tests to allow more women to pass). I have never seen any study that suggests women are smarter than men. Women tend to the middle of the IQ range. Men also tend towards the middle however there are two differences. The 'middle' of the male IQ range is up to 10 iq points ahead o…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:37 AM
1

Correct. If brain size is not important then evolution would not have selected for larger brains especially considering larger brains not only hurts women but often kills them during childbirth. The benefits of large brains offset the negatives of death during childbirth. Therefore large brains are VERY important. But suddenly, when comparing men and women, brain sizes are not important. That is inconsistent.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:28 AM
2

Black women have taken to feminism in a hilarious fashion much like black people took to white religion more than white people do. Its as if they saw white people doing these things and thought if they did them too but only harder they would turn into white people. Kind alike a cargo cult.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:23 AM
1

IMHO females are not as intelligent as males. They simply don't have the same capabilities in this area. People will readily agree when I point out that females are less physically capable than men, why is the intellectual deficit seen as so controversial just because its hidden away inside the brain where we cannot literally see it like we can with male muscles? Male brains are larger heavier and contain more neurons and more connections. Simple inescapable facts. If bigger brains didn't mean m…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:05 AM
1

Bleach her shirt
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:21 AM
3

Feminists attacking a pro male candidate yup mens issue
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:20 AM
1

Please give us the uncensored version.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:18 AM
-1

And I am trying to explain that I think male and female may have never been the same species. Instead two different species came together, such as in lichen, in a symbiotic relationship, and over geological time evolved together until they were able to exchange genetic information laterally, after which evolution favored a division of labor as to the carrying of needed genes, for efficiency, which gave rise to genetic polymorphism and eventually genders. So men and women are like the fungal and …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:01 AM
-1

I believe male and female (which evolved long before humans were around) evolved from the splitting of an ancestor species into two separate species that evolved and lived in a symbiotic relationship. We don't question that men and women are the same species for the same reason we don't usually question knowledge held to be self evident. IMHO it is obvious, from a taxonomic and genetic perspective that males and females are different species or at least different sub species. In fact it is even …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:36 AM
-1

Men have female and male Chromosomes making them full humans. Women only have the X chromosome meaning they are less than full human. This is why I believe male to female trans are a real thing but female to male transsexuals are as likely as human to dragon otherkin.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:49 AM
0

I cannot see how you should have a prior partner support you as well as your current partner. That's double dipping. The female imperative is to commandeer male resources on behalf of females. You seem to be going well there.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:45 AM
-4

if Hillary was a man she would be Trump
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:36 AM
1

Here are references proving this lateral gene transfer occurs. BTW I found out it's called Telegony. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC383270/ http://m.bloodjournal.org/content/120/3/505.long?view=long&pmid=22627770
/r/askTRP26/04/16 04:57 AM
1

I never knew that term before. I just googled it and Wikipedia said telegony was debunked then at the bottom it said it had been debunked then undebunked lol and that lateral transfer of genes does occur. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC383270/ http://m.bloodjournal.org/content/120/3/505.long?view=long&pmid=22627770
/r/askTRP26/04/16 04:56 AM
1

Cellular mosaics are not harmful (except the cancer risk of course) because the different genes are present in separate cells that live side by side. Normally sperm cells do not contain the full complement of chromosomes. However during fusion if some extra material happens to be present then enters fusion the resulting embryo could inherit extra copies of certain chromosomes and so suffer genetic diseases like xyy.
/r/askTRP26/04/16 12:03 AM
1

I cant understand why theyd willingly switch to being male. Well they switch because, in theory, mentally they are male and have the wrong body. I don't know how that's possible because they don't have any male genes from the Y chromosome. It's obviously possible for a person to be born in a male body to have a female brain because genetic males have female DNA from their X chromosome. Men have all the DNA that makes up women plus extra while women don't have all the bits that make up men.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:04 PM
1

Yeah I guess so. I was more thinking about how they didn't have the same experience of male specific oppression growing up and that it is harder for someone with privilege aka a woman to become someone without privilege aka a man than the reverse. It's obviously easier to go from no privilege to privilege. But yeah you're right I didn't think of that. They don't have our background of male specific oppression but they will experience it soon enough.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 10:58 PM
-7

Because they're not men. That said Im not against it. I just cannot think of any reasons for men's rights supporting women. If someone else can think of a good reason for it.... I mean I have no problem with including them but it just didn't form part of my argument because I personally couldn't think of a good reason. Supporting those who were born male or born looking like men seems a no brainer. DO women to male trans, who appear male publically, experience the same discrimination and oppress…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:51 AM
9

However it creates the appearance of a feminist win. This must be fought to the death. The way to fight it is simply by demanding that if male only clubs are to be opened then female only clubs must be opened.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:03 AM
4

Men's rights and transsexuals (men to women) need to ally. It needs to come from both sides separately with people like you from the Trans community reaching out as you have here asking for us to be allies with you and condemning feminists as unworthy allies who don't care about the issues of transsexuals because they mostly effect people who appear to be men or were born male. In turn men's rights needs to reach out to the Trans community is when we present male issues including issues facing m…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:25 AM
4

I'm I don't understand this one at all. I mean only ugly girls shit so can't we just have a unisex toilet for men and ugly girls? The pretty girls don't need a toilet at all. Mmaybe just a room with a tap and a mirror so they can go powder their noses every time they're escorting their ugly friends to the toilet.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:09 AM
3

Yeahs it's not a very sexy activity.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:07 AM
4

Obviously cost space and time is consumed by making two rooms instead of one large well designed room. You could even increase the number of toilets in the same space and improve efficiency for the same cost and time. Plus the benefits of one line for the toilets. I'm sure everyone can figure out the benefits there.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:06 AM
2

Feminism actually abuses black men just as much or sometimes more than white men depending on the situation.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:57 AM
5

Funnily enough feminist inventions like intersectional oppressions can actually be used against them more effectively than for them. Off the top of my head a white man is 20 times more likely to be shot than a white woman. A black man is 5 times more likely to be shot than a white man. Therefore according to the maths of intersectional oppressions a black man is around 100 times more likely to be shot than a white woman. Yet feminists claim they are the most oppressed. Clearly due to intersectio…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:55 AM
5

Lucky women don't have babies come out of their penises/urethra then hey? Lucky too that no woman has to give birth, like ever. It is utterly 100 percent the woman's choice to give birth every single time.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:52 AM
1

Or men's clubs. Oh wait that was already a very successful business model. Feminist cock breakers (a kind of scab like strike breakers) broke up all the men's spaces and instituted female spaces by force. We could and should have male only spaces.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:40 AM
1

Don't confuse our current cultural scene for something fixed in stone. Men's clubs and pubs existed for a long time without catering to women or men chasing women. The business model that catered to men worked fine and plenty of men like time with men and no women around. The feminists of course changed that by outlawing male spaces while instituting female spaces.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:38 AM
11

threatening to end the relationship Wow. Men are no longer allowed to break up with a girl if 'no sex' is the reason for the breakup. Otherwise it's rape or attempted rape!
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:54 AM
1

Men do commit more violent crime I dont believe that. Since the system is biased the stats are biased.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:10 AM
2

You cannot make your partner wear a condom? Seriously? Have you tried asking? Have you tried saying no sex without a condom? Because if he forces you to have sex without a condom that is rape. So essentially you are saying you need birth control pills because you are being raped regularly but refuse to report it. Or is it you who is unwilling to go without sex? Perhaps he is saying okay no sex and you are unwilling to live without sex and are then agreeing to sex without a condom. That's your fa…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:37 AM
2

Women who are pregnant are often emotionally compromised: depressed scared desperate and so on. Waiting 24 hours to be sure is not a hardship.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:28 AM
2

I can multitask quite well. I actually developed the capacity to split my mind into two streams of consciousness and each stream can carry on its own conversation with different people at the same time. I developed this ability over a period of time but what started it is when I wondered if I could think two things at once and devised a way to do so by saying a word out loud while saying a different word in my thoughts and quickly that turned to me being able to think two thoughts at once.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 11:41 PM
2

I want it I want to want it There is millions of years of evolution behind that 'state of mind' The mind is as physical a thing as the body I don't believe in free will
/r/MensRights21/04/16 11:31 PM
21

Men do not commit more crimes than women. Rather, men are suspected more reported more arrested more charged more found guilty more and sentenced more for the same crimes. Men are the new black.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:59 AM
1

Women are less aware of others around them and so imagine only their personal problems are real and everyone else lives in wonderland.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:28 AM
3

Your idea is sound but your poster is bad both in terms of its message and it's design
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:19 PM
1

Society is gynocentric because females have a vagina monopoly. That's it. That's the sole source of female value. There is no caloric cost to females from pregnancy. None. All their calories are provided by the male. There is or used to be some physical risk to the female from pregnancy. The amount of this risk is debatable and cannot be quantified accurately. Further the only option to avoid this risk totally is to not reproduce and therefore this is not a winning strategy for ones genes. There…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:04 AM
1

You shouldn't feel bad for hitting a girl. Equal means equal treatment. I've been hit by both guys and girls and I've responded the same in every case by using violent force in return. One time what was really funny a girl hit me and was going to continue and I went bam straight in her gut and she doubled up and then fell on her arse and there was this expression on her face like a baby whose dummy was taken away wa wa wa what just happened to me. Lol. Good times. It was as satisfying as any tim…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:20 PM
8

This is not entirely accurate, mostly towards the end, for example the comment repeatedly says men pay far less than women for their sexuality then says that men and women actually split the costs. It's either one or the other. Men pay for their offspring whether married or not whether living with the mothers or not. In fact they generally pay more than half. While the mother pays directly in terms of resources redirected to the fetus where do you imagine those resources come from in the first p…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:01 PM
3

I do.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter