TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wallsie Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by Wallsie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The funny part of that is Chelsea seems to be trying to step away from humor so she can be taken more seriously lately.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:40 PM
2

I'm more just surprised Maddox is still around.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:38 PM
5

I think you underestimate the victim complex feminists espouse.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:02 AM
12

I'm pretty optimistic what it will do to cut down on poverty, birth rate be damned.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:17 AM
1

Nobody is saying she should be forced into a relationship, just that the male should have a say in the life of the child.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:56 PM
1

Not with current medicine, no.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:55 PM
1

The second you consent to sexual intercourse, you have already agreed to parent a child should that outcome occur. No form of contraception is infallible.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:54 PM
1

I think that would be a statistically insignificant minority.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:50 PM
5

You can damn sure bet I'd wear them if someone offered me that kind of money.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:31 PM
1

You're right in that there are a plethora of parents looking, but most people aren't likely to adopt outside of their race so it makes it very hard. You know and I know that most of those kids are going to be non-whites. So like I said, there are not people out there for all of these suddenly-removed children.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:36 PM
1

You are right, and there should be a distinction. I would agree that a child would be best served by a full and caring home rather than the person who manipulated the other into having a child. That said, how do you enforce that? Does this become strictly a case-by-case decision based on what some judge thinks? That leads to serious disparity in how cases are handled. That's where this becomes a seriously murky discussion.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:27 PM
1

I agree, but this is the rationale a LOT of judges use.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:41 PM
31

Makes it more complex for the crazy ones at least. They not only have to stop taking their birth control but now tamper with the man's.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:29 PM
7

That's just as fucked as a woman doing it.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:27 PM
7

No, removing the child while still an infant from the single parent home and adopting it out would be best. In a perfect world, yes. But you're assuming there are people out there for all these suddenly removed children, and that's not the case. Aside from that, you're going to argue that it would be against the child's best interest to be in contact with their birth mom from birth?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:26 PM
9

No one gives a shit about mens feelings. Not even most other men. Especially other men.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:56 PM
2

And immediately turned it into a lawsuit for not providing equal facilities.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:39 AM
4

Yeah I would have gone in there and used the obviously unused urinals.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 07:29 PM
7

The mother-son relationship is oftentimes just as possessive. I'm sure you've heard plenty of cases of "that whore isn't good enough for my boy!" My mom clearly did not like my choice of wife, and I'm pretty sad that it's something they never really worked out before she died, but that kind of thing absolutely happens and more often than society would like us to believe.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:50 PM
2

They'll be close-minded forever if nobody makes the attempt to change their mind. Yes, there are hopeless cases. You'll never know if you don't try that first time though.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:10 PM
2

Because change occurs one mind at a time.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:16 PM
2

Yeah, ignoring the problem makes it go away. We all learned that in school right?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:14 PM
5

That's not true at all. The typical male conservative point of view on custodial rights in the past has been to side with the woman because "women are supposed to be homemakers and are generally better at raising children". Liberal judges are much more likely to side with a man these days.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 02:11 PM
2

Like there's any money left to recover.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:38 AM
28

That's a more accurate way of looking at it now that you point it out.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:23 PM
16

Boys lose the ability to manifest their thoughts into reality at around four or five Could you expand on this?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:16 PM
51

or "women's way of knowing." Questioning this ability is misogyny. Is it not possible that this is sort of a self-feeding spiral? Men think they are safer at night than women, so they have a higher propensity to travel at night alone, thus making men far more likely to be the target of a crime?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:15 PM
0

I didn't say they should get to. All I'm saying is that people look at the housewife or househusband and think they just don't contribute and that's a flat-out lie.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:12 PM
2

It's a How I Met Your Mother reference.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:10 PM
2

That's definitely a truth-fact.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:47 PM
0

Sounds like you had a crappy lawyer. Edit: That came off more dickish than necessary, sorry you got screwed over. The downvote for stating a truth was unnecessary, though.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:15 AM
-15

... which is an argument that completely ignores the work the housebound spouse does to keep the home and take care of the child(ren), whether they be male or female. They frequently forego a career in the interest of taking care of the family duties. Edit: Wow, the bitterness is strong in this sub.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:05 AM
0

Indeed. Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to simple ignorance (or in this case, stupidity).
/r/MensRights12/07/14 01:21 PM
8

Eh, could just be a case of glass jaw. Especially if there was any size difference. It really doesn't take a lot of effort to either dislocate or break a jaw.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:23 AM
4

Wouldn't really call her a "lady" at this point, though that's splitting hairs.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:48 AM
1

Yeah true. But he sure doesn't do it now.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:56 AM
1

Yeah that first run he bounced outside for four yards after getting stuffed is something Turner can't do anymore.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:52 AM
1

Yeah it clearly hurt the run game from what we could see from the first couple sites. SJax had no running room.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:45 AM
1

Oh yeah their RT earlier this week? I was disappointed to hear that.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:49 PM
6

Are you a humanity fan? Things like this transcend the sport.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:25 PM
1

Male officials are not in a position where they have the luxury of being worried about accusations of sexism. If you're a judge, you damn sure better be upholding the law no matter the gender of the accused. If you take gender into account unnecessarily then you have no right to hold that position.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:10 PM
1

Then go to Malaysia and work your magic there. In the civilized world, feminism doesn't have a place.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:23 PM
2

I would tend to agree with just about all of that. That said, the point I was making was that the guy must have thought everything was fine or else he would have seen the divorce request coming.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:20 PM
17

Which means that she never brought up her concerns to give him a chance to work on whatever was bothering her... so she gave up on it.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:55 PM
9

You have good reason. A family friend that passed away a while ago was a deputy in our county for a couple decades. The stories about shit they used to get away with doing to people make me shudder. A lot of it they would never get away with now, but I'm sure plenty of stuff happens that we don't know about. Such is the case with authority everywhere. Though then again some of it was hilarious. He said if they caught someone for a DUI sometimes they would chuck their keys into a field instead of…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:20 AM
19

I'd rather get tried for a misdemeanor recording everything that goes on around me than have no evidence of some serious shit going on. Edit: Just saying, he's got higher priorities.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:05 AM
3

I wouldn't go that far. There needs to be personal culpability. If women see that the woman (or women) are punished for false accusations of rape, then they will think twice about using it as a weapon. If they get off with a stern talking to, it results in nothing. Both things are problems though.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:49 PM
4

Yeah, because a parent is going to start a law suit over a phone. It would cost more in legal fees than the phone was ever worth.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:01 PM
0

Wow there's a leap of logic. I mean to say that if you're having sex regularly then either you're going on a lot of cheap dates (which adds up), or you're getting busy with the kind of people anyone with self-respect wouldn't be sticking it in.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:07 AM
0

I would argue anyone paying more for video games than sex is the one doing it wrong. If it's costing you less to have sex that means you're getting it on with skanks and bums and you're going to eventually end up in the exact situation we're discussing, or a similar one.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:16 AM
-1

If sex is your only form of happiness, you better have condoms handy. That's not an excuse. Edit: Also, games are cheaper than sex in the long run.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:42 PM
3

Of course that falls back to the culture of masculinity and "what a man should be". It's a holdover from centuries past.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:12 AM
-12

Stop having sex if you can't have kids. Really fucking simple. Children as a result of rape are the only exceptions where I have sympathy.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:02 AM
3

So... synonym?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:58 PM
1

Considering the cops gave him the option to press charges, this is not about the legal system as it pertains to men. This is a case of poor decision-making through and through.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:27 AM
1

Considering how psychotic this woman sounds (and how much lying she's doing) you really should try to play up the disability angle. You need as much ammunition as you can get.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:24 AM
2

Was kinda wondering the same thing.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:21 AM
6

When I see SRS I immediately think "Serious Retard Syndrome". I still to this day don't know what it actually stands for.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:20 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:06 AM
1

Possibly the same charge, sentence reduced to something like 2 years probation and a little community service.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:20 AM
2

Maybe he would, maybe not - but you can bet that she wouldn't be going to prison over here.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:15 AM
1

Great point. The last thing we want is for women to have another reason not to report rape. I don't believe the "1 in whatever ridiculous number of rapes is reported" figure, but I do believe that there are a significant number of real ones that go unreported and we should be trying to bring that number as close to zero as possible. Harsh laws on false accusation are not the best reaction. We need to stop being so sensationalist and get the facts reported properly.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:09 AM
3

Not sure why this is being downvoted. Must come with the territory or something. The kind of comment you responded to only serves to make MRA's look just as bad as radical feminists. It also makes him look like an angry person that does not understand the concepts of learning from mistakes or empathy.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter