TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WallyRenfield Archive

View 1 post and 46 comments by WallyRenfield on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

WallyRenfield/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

To add to this: The fact we can see that disparity in just a few words makes it worse. Imagine how unloved a son would feel living with a woman who says things like that constantly.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:47 AM
3

I'll have you know I identify as a broken record.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:32 AM
2

Working on finding the original article and the follow up. See /u/iandmlne 's comment for an excerpt from the original article.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:14 AM
3

Courtesy of /u/iandmlne this contains an excerpt from her earlier article. I'll have to keep digging for the one immediately following his suicide.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:14 AM
1

Courtesy of /u/iandmlne this contains an excerpt from her earlier article. I'll have to keep digging for the one immediately following his suicide.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:13 AM
100

Sadly, some of them do. I seem to remember a series of articles posted by a blogger here who first felt guilty for having a son and then, after said son attempted suicide, wrote a long article about herself. **Edit: Here's the best I can do. First, an article she wrote in The Guardian mocking male suicide awareness. It's not what I had in mind originally, but it'll do. Here is her article following her son's suicide. Decide for yourself.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 02:39 PM
1

You'd think that a feminist arguing against a definition of rape law that included male victims would be "weak in power" but Mary Koss successfully lobbied to do just that. You'd think that a feminist organization that perpetuates the stereotype of intimate partner violence being a gendered male on female crime despite studies showing that in significant numbers of cases that role is reversed would be weak in power, but that's exactly what the National Organization for Women does. You'd think th…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:41 PM
0

No feminist group worth their weight would ever "declare all men to be rapists" You'll notice I said "certain feminist groups." Dworkin style feminists are still feminists whether you choose to recognize them as such or not.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:07 AM
10

The part in reference to all female teachers being sexual predators seems to be a snarky parody of certain feminist groups who declare all men to be rapists.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:14 PM
5

I'm pleasantly surprised. Could this lay the legal ground work for challenging discriminatory practices at other employers or is this a special case due to the government being the company's primary customer? Investigators say the company based work assignments on gender stereotypes: putting women in “light duty” jobs and having men do more labor intensive work I can think of a handful of other GSA companies that do very similar things.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:56 PM
7

To combine the comments from /u/chavelah and /u/thelandofdreams and go a step further, I don't think that women are necessarily more inclined to do terrible shit like this than men are. I think it's more that society in general is more accepting of claims from women and more skeptical of claims from men. It leads to sort of positive feedback loop that encourages women to act in this particular shitty way in ways men, outside of very specific circumstances, don't bother.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:56 PM
1

Be the change you want to see. When your friends post nonsense like that, call them out yourself. I'll do the same with my friends, as I do already. I'm not the type of person to lead a movement, even a local one. It's just not in my DNA. However, I'll debate anyone I know one to one. I try to remember in situations like this that we're not arguing for the sake of convincing that specific person, we're arguing for the sake of convincing any neutrals that may be listening.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:41 PM
2

Or they'll protest until women are exempt again and then drop the issue completely.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:49 AM
2

No. If we hold tuition as a form of compensation, there's a far greater inequality between student athletes and students on academic scholarships as the students on academic scholarships don't generate any revenue. Even female athletes would then have a gripe as at least they generate some revenue. There's inequality within the current system, but it's not gender inequality. Therefore, it's not a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:37 AM
5

You're arguing proportions but it's irrelevant. Zero is a special number. It represents the state of, quite literally, "nothing." No matter how you try to compare how the zero percent of revenue men's athletes receive to the zero percent of revenue female athletes receive, the difference will always be zero. The proportions of revenue that the athletes receive is equal no matter the gender. Therefore, in terms of gender equality, it is equal. You can absolutely support the idea of paying student…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:51 PM
3

I'm not a republican by any stretch of the imagination. Despite voting mostly for democrats in the last 10 years, I wouldn't label myself as one. In fact, I'm not sure a label exists for my particular ideology. That being said, the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency terrifies me almost as much any of the republicans I watched debate last week. This is the first time in my voting life that I feel not only mostly indifferent to the candidates, but genuinely fear what the country will be like…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:16 PM
11

She continued: "A Labour Party after a century of championing equality and diversity which turns the clock back to be led again by a leader and deputy leader, both white men. "Or to smash our own glass ceiling to get Labour's first elected woman leader and woman prime minister too. Who's the real radical? Jeremy or me?" So her entire platform is "I'm a woman!?" She spends all her time(and this is far too common in modern politics) bashing her opponent's ideas while not really presenting any alte…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 10:59 PM
2

To piggyback on this, while yes men's sports generate more revenue for colleges than women's sports do, women don't get paid either. While it's a shitty situation all around, it's a shitty situation that's more or less equal. It only becomes a men's right issue if women's athletes start getting more benefits than men's athletes.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 10:33 PM
6

I hope you speak up. Before you do, however, you need to have your documentation in order. One angry email filled with anecdotes is easily ignored. An angry email filled with relevant information from the seminar that could easily be turned over to sympathetic reporters can not. I'd suggest speaking with one of the organizers(likely someone in your campus health center) and request to attend the seminar again. They'll probably be happy that a student is enthusiastic about their program. Once the…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 10:28 PM
1

If it's lag on the server updates, why are newer posts from other subs showing up on my "new" feed?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:27 PM
1

Even more confusing, they mix moderate statements in with radical ones. On it's surface the author's statement about equal opportunity is reasonable. Using it to justify his wife's infidelity and preach that arrangement to others is radical. The muddy waters are more mud than water.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:02 AM
4

What’s important is equality of opportunity, not outcome. Then I guess this feminist would agree that we should start applying that standard to other issues as well. I eagerly await his article explaining that the lack of women in STEM fields and executive positions is ok because it's "equality of opportunity, not outcome" that's important and his admission that we were right all along. Yup, that should come any day now...any...day...now...
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:46 PM
2

1 2 3 4 There's just a few. The thread is up to 20,000 comments and I can't be arsed to read through all of them again, but this will give you an idea of what I saw.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 09:29 PM
1

Maybe when I get home. At this point there's 15,000+ comments in the thread I'll have to sort through. I'll see what I can do.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:31 AM
2

When this admin post went up, there were walls of text dedicated to bashing subs like ours within minutes. It's not a coincidence and it's fairly obvious that some ideologically motivated users had prepared statements beforehand. The propaganda is real. In the future, I suggest we avoid linking these posts here until well after the storm has passed so our users can actively participate in the thread without the vague gray-area of brigading looming over our heads. We know that many of us are find…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:57 PM
16

I can see the parallel with neo-fems if you ignore that TRP doesn't doesn't organize, protest or really perform any actions as a group in the real world.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:52 PM
32

My god, the Anti-MRA's had their propaganda prepared ahead of time. I clicked on the admin announcement post 3 minutes after it was posted and there were already a dozen comments that were basically walls of text calling for the end of Men's Rights, TRP, TiA, KiA...all the subs that dare question women. Seems like we need to step up our propaganda machine to compete.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:22 PM
13

I'm already aware of those punishments regarding federal jobs and financial aid. You're preaching to the choir. I'm also aware of the previous prosecutions in the 80's. My question to /u/mochacola was spurred by the wording of his comment. The phrase "contract signed in exchange" left the impression that voting and selective service registration were devised together and I hadn't heard that before. It lead me to believe that the loss of voting rights was an explicit trade rather than a secondary…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:52 AM
17

While outside of the court room, we know why the courts ruled against men challenging the selective service because of bias, it's what happens in the court room that matters. When courts make an assertion in their rulings, they're bound by them until sufficient evidence is prevented. In the 2000 Rostker v. Goldberg case on the issue, William Rehnquist wrote of his decision: "[t]he existence of the combat restrictions clearly indicates the basis for Congress' decision to exempt women from registr…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:42 AM
8

While it's true that failing to register for the selective service is classified as a felony, there hasn't been conviction since 1986. The right to vote isn't relinquished without a conviction. Granted, it's still an ever lingering possibility while the law is in place. My reasoning above for being happy about the young woman's lawsuit is as follows: 1) Challenges to forced male registration on the grounds of gender bias were previously dismissed via the notion that women were banned from combat…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:26 AM
7

That's interesting. Got a source on the selective service in exchange for voting thing? I'm not doubting it, I'd just like to read it for myself.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:17 AM
147

This young lady might have done men across the country a huge favor. A court could potentially rule that women exempt from draft registration don’t have standing to sue because they don’t actually suffer any harm as a result (draft registration is usually considered a burden, not a benefit) As the article stated, the case may be dismissed on procedural grounds. If the court uses the same logic in its ruling as above, it can set a precedent for other courts to consider. If it's established that t…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:23 PM
5

'The Internet's wonderful, thank you, Al Gore. But it also is a danger,' Berrien County District Court Judge Dennis Wiley said. 'You went online, to use a fisherman's expression, trolling for women to meet and have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior. There is no excuse for this, whatsoever.' So the judge based his verdict entirely on his own disapproval of casual sex? Moral indignation be damned, an adult male see…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:08 PM
3

Your rhetoric is laughable, but I'll take the bait. The only question you've asked that's worth responding to is "But what are you trying to accomplish?" In no particular order: Acknowledgement by lawmakers and federal authorities that males being "made to penetrate" without their consent is nothing less than rape and, given the findings of this CDC report from 2011 showing that after such acknowledgement males are victims nearly as often as females, male victims thus be afforded the same protec…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:38 AM
24

Why did anyone bother to even ask about their genders? Minions are fictional, silly characters. They're amorphous yellow blobs with hands and feet. Is their gender relevant to the story in any way? What sane person sees nonsensical, inhuman characters in a children's movie and ponders their reproductive organs?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:41 PM
3

That's a fair example to ponder. We're left wondering once again what the state's definition of "impairment" is. That single word raises so many questions. Is alcohol related impairment held to the same standard as driving in regards to BAC? If so, how is a victim's inebriation proven after the incident? When drugs are involved, legal or otherwise, what is the grace period between intake and, for lack of a better term, sobriety? How would that be proven? The more we look at the wording of the bi…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:36 PM
2

While certainly the definitions of "coercion", "impairment" and "each specific sexual act" need to be more narrowly defined, this is really the elephant in the room: The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant's sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. Good in theory, let's see it applied in practice. If the authorities treat each case on its own merits and give male victims equal treatment, we don't have a problem. If they continue to operate under the…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:34 PM
1

There's no doubt that feminists and misandrists in general use the term in a derogatory manner. As with all derogatory terms, however, the word can only have as much power as the person it's directed towards allows it to have. Being offended or outraged by the term breaths life into it. Being offended or outraged is a choice we individually make. If someone says you're a "cis-male", the most effective response is "Yes, I am. What's your point?"
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:52 PM
7

The responses to Code Blue and Code Orange would be the most effective and can be adjusted to fit any of the other scenarios listed. The other responses are weak and counterproductive. When your detractors choose to attack you rather than the issue at hand, they're shifting focus away from what's important. Every response you provide defending yourself veers the conversation farther and farther away from the real issue and distracts any neutral audience from focusing on the topic at hand. Code B…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:53 PM
430

"Please tell me why people expect an adult to handle their own business!"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 10:05 PM
5

When we stop perpetuating antiquated gender roles, male victims will be taken more seriously. But let's be perfectly honest -- those gender roles were created by men. False. Both genders had a hand in, benefited from and rigidly enforced the creation of gender roles.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:19 PM
3

Eh, I'd be more inclined to agree with Fuzzy's comment in this regard. While treatments(be it medicinal or alternative forms as you described) can help make the peaks and valleys less severe, it's self awareness that's ultimately necessary. We can't always control our emotions, but with practice we can try and control our actions.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 09:00 PM
2

I developed the categories from personal experiences. The categories are admittedly broad, but they served their purpose. The OP was even broader and I attempted to differentiate between "some of the most horrible, manipulative people on earth" and the rest of us. I could theoretically further divide the categories to give more clarification, but I don't see it as being relevant. To simplify my original comment, there are people who use their disease as an excuse and people who don't. The illnes…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 08:40 PM
2

I'd argue that it's not the Bipolar Disorder that makes the marriages fail, but rather the prevailing female perspective regarding the disorder that makes them fail. Let me elaborate. I was diagnosed with BPD in my early 20's and have met a good number of people in the same boat. The people I've met seem to fall into 2 categories: 1) People who embrace the disease and use it as a crutch. They're resistant to changing any personal habits for fear of losing their "special" status. They expect the …
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:51 PM
92

Only male murder suspects.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:02 PM
5

To sum up the article: MRA's don't need to exist because feminism already covers their issues. Now excuse me while I, a self proclaimed feminist, attempt to shit on each and every one of those issues.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter