Wambo45 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Outrage culture at its finest. There's something very revealing about how that insult has taken off. It's as if, to many, being able to fuck women is ultimately the standard of value for men. It's also telling of the person using it, in that they apparently think a man's opinions has very much at all to do with whether or not women fuck them. But of course, that couldn't be further from the truth. I have never encountered this tactic anywhere but the internet, because people will never look at me face to face and think to use…	/r/MensRights	02/01/20 08:54 PM
7	The Rollo Pill Not arguing your general points but Rollo was at the cigar bar. There's a video.	/r/TheRedPill	10/06/19 07:14 PM
9	The Rollo Pill If you continue trying to define and reduce what ails society to a lowest common denominator, you will not find an answer. You won't find an end of the tunnel. It's a fool's errand. You will end up in infinite regress until, at best, you conclude that natalism itself is the root of all suffering. But nihilism is gay as fuck, and arguably more destructive than any ideology, so we plant flags. I've listened to a handful of your arguments and objections to the status quo of this "sphere". While I d…	/r/TheRedPill	10/06/19 06:54 PM
4	On finally fucking a girl after 18 years of celibacy This is fluffy, ideological horseshit. This is not red pill at all. This is just a different brand of idealization and personal conjecture. The red pill is not an ideology.	/r/TheRedPill	29/08/18 12:32 AM
3	Is It Difficult to Not Be Creepy? I mean. Most of this is moot considering it’s ultimately personal opinion. No, it's not personal opinion. It's an objective statement. Doing something you know to have certain risks leaves you partly to blame for the consequences of taking those risks. End of story. So you’re free to ascribe blame as suits your moral system. I'm not ascribing blame based on some arbitrary moral system. I'm doing it based on objective causal factors I can’t say that I’d be comfortable with living in a justice sys…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/08/18 05:22 PM
5	Is It Difficult to Not Be Creepy? No. Telling people to be cautious is intended to encourage them to be careful so they don't get hurt. It's also intended as fair warning to impart the notion that beyond this point, they are doing things at their own risk. Victim blaming is telling someone that they're to blame for getting hurt. Which they are, in part, if they knowingly did something risky. ie: I work at a homeless shelter. Many of my clients have mental health disorders and addictions that make it hard for them to control thei…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/08/18 04:49 PM
1	75 years ago, men and only men were conscripted to die in WW2. Today, game developers shoehorn female soldiers in WW2 games, unabashedly erasing men's coerced sacrifice from popular culture, all for money. No surprise that the MRA sub is full of placating men, who will focus their attention on dissecting all of the minutia inherent to arguments regarding "historically accuracy", as if they're too coy to see the elephant in the room: It's just another example of encroachment on traditional male space, pitched as inclusivity. Fuck all these arguments about how historically accurate the series is. It's irrelevant. The game has always been dominated by a male player base, and the subject matter is bas…	/r/MensRights	14/07/18 07:31 AM
4	I didn't even know I had an Adonis Belt until she said "That is OBSCENE" Because you said he was insulting. Did you forget that you just typed that?	/r/TheRedPill	28/06/18 11:27 AM
1	Toxic Masculinity Seems like we're from entirely different worlds of thought here. To me I'm just saying completely non controversial things, to you they seem like these crazy left wing wacko insidious bad faith arguments. To me it seems like we have a disagreement, and potentially a fundamental one in how we define the terms we're using to have the debate. And I don't think it's relevant or helpful to invoke anything political about this topic, in regards to left or right wing. But I will say that what you're sa…	/r/MensRights	15/03/18 12:52 AM
2	Toxic Masculinity Seems like you're actually not understanding what I'm saying. I am not arguing that "we" don't need to be "so masculine" in modernity, I'm saying that there are traits that have traditionally been associated with masculinity that are no longer useful in a society that guarantees physical safety in the way that ours does, and treats women as equals in the way that ours does. The type of masculinity of the past that valued physical strength over all else, the inability to see one's own faults, a r…	/r/MensRights	10/03/18 11:32 PM
6	Toxic Masculinity Women are rarely called catty or bitchy for being "assertive". That's utter nonsense. They're called that when they're being passive aggressive and subversively hostile. And men call women out for this behavior too. So what are they doing? Toxic femininity or toxic masculinity? Furthermore, while passive aggressive behavior may be mlre prevalent in women than men, men behave that way too at time. So now what? When a man is "throwing shade", is that toxic femininity? The point is you are arbitrar…	/r/MensRights	10/03/18 01:41 PM
3	Toxic Masculinity This is a very roundabout way of arguing that the issue of whether masculinity is toxic or not, is a matter of degree rather than quality. You are repudiating the "need" for masculinity because: "modernity". The fact that so many people keep parroting this sentiment, and then passing it off as a sophisticated criticism is frustrating. You are arguing that we don't need to be so masculine in 2018. And that's bullshit. We need it more than ever, just without the general pathologies that can, and d…	/r/MensRights	10/03/18 01:35 PM
8	The wreckage of Feminism is here and its hilarious. Very interesting reads there. Never heard of this. Thanks.	/r/TheRedPill	03/03/18 09:57 PM
70	The wreckage of Feminism is here and its hilarious. Don't send them to the oil field. I've got enough bitch ass men to deal with, let alone a female who either can't, or simply won't pull her weight.	/r/TheRedPill	03/03/18 09:50 PM
4	Oneitis- What It Is and How To Cure It You sabotaged yourself, but even if you hadn't, there's a good chance you were never going to pull her away from the financial security and hypergamous nature of her relationship with her bf. Get over it, dude. She wasn't worth a damn anyway, hence why she was fucking you behind her boyfriend's back. Think about what kind of person even thinks in those strategic terms, the lack of principles thereof, and ask yourself why you'd even regard such a person as worthy? What? Because she's got a "sense…	/r/TheRedPill	10/02/18 07:10 PM
8	Jordan Peterson's Cathy Newman Interview: Good Example Of "Meta-Frame" Against Feminism OP needs to do some serious introspection if he interprets JP's argument as beta in any way, when it is essentially the free and open adulation of competitive behavior regardless of sex.	/r/TheRedPill	24/01/18 12:08 AM
32	Teacher former student AWALT example. I know this is off topic to the sub, but I'm glad you said this. So many western people have this arrogance about them that they can properly discern what someone must "really" be thinking, when they hear something they find irrational. Religious fundamentalists ought to be taken seriously for the things they're actually telling us, because they truly are that delusional and unaware of it. A man doesn't blow himself up on a lie which he knows to be untrue. He does it with absolute conviction of …	/r/TheRedPill	05/01/18 08:44 AM
1	Anon is right As women are not seen as moral agents, they are not treated as subject to moral standards or as possessing capacity for great moral virtue (or vice). This contradicts the very well put points you make later in regards to sexual dynamics and the PDS. All in all, I agreed with a lot of what you said, but you deal in a lot of absolutes and your ideas are couched in a predisposition of males always drawing the short end of the stick. I see it as much closer to a mutually beneficial arrangement, whic…	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 07:13 AM
1	Anon is right Okay. So why aren't you applying this gender-neutrally? Because that sounds like a gender-neutral process. It is a gender neutral process insofar as who it applies to. But women are encouraged to take charge of their lives, practice discipline and assert dominance over their situations. These are all masculine things that are being asked of them, no matter what manner of semantic guise you wish to use. Whether someone tells you to "man up", or "you're not little miss princess", or "quit acting l…	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 07:12 AM
1	Anon is right Just because the average man is stronger than the average woman does not imply that all men have a duty to protect and provide for all women. But that's a straw man that you've made up. You're introducing an absolute where it isn't merited. Nobody said all men, nobody said all women. But that is beside the point of whether or not there will be social memes about opening jars, or grabbing a weapon to check out a noise in the house. this means strong men and strong women both owe protection... not…	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 06:43 AM
1	Anon is right So men should never vent? Men should never have space to be outraged or angry? Men should never be able to get things off their chest in the way that suits them as individuals? The fact that men are capable of being victimized should never be acknowledged? Straw man. Never said that. I think anger is a place you visit briefly, not where you build a home. I also don't think the OP is necessarily a victimized man. I've been involved with a lot of people in addiction counseling and psychological th…	/r/MensRights	19/12/17 07:20 PM
1	Anon is right And if you don't think that the preponderance of other individuals (at least in the west) doesn't believe in some kind of chivalric "men should protect and provide for women" ideal then I don't know what to say to you. It's irresponsible to conflate all appeals for the physically dominant sex to be protectors, with petty white knighting. The ideal is born from an attempt to organize society so that the strongest defend the weakest, which is a noble cause. It is not intended to be a capitulation …	/r/MensRights	19/12/17 07:20 PM
1	Anon is right I'm going by society's general expectations of men. That's what defines the masculine gender role. What society expects of you. "Society" doesn't expect you to white knight or to flaunt vanity and status. Those examples were inadequate to make your point, and they don't represent masculinity. You're simply substituting your own ideal of what men should be like, claiming that this is objectively correct/real, and avoiding the argument. Because you don't like to connect negative things with the wo…	/r/MensRights	19/12/17 05:01 AM
1	Anon is right For example, white knighting encourages men to throw other men under the bus in order to please women. Macho-dominance showboating to impress women and prove oneself "the better man" is this kind of thing too. If by white knighting, you're referring to the pandering men do because they think it garners them favor in a woman's eyes, well pandering is not a masculine thing to do. If by showboating, you mean gaudy pageantry and vanity, well that isn't masculine either. In fact, they're all behavior…	/r/MensRights	16/12/17 04:16 PM
-3	Anon is right That is an untrue and ridiculous absolute statement. This sub really echoes a lot of "toxic masculinity" rhetoric.	/r/MensRights	15/12/17 01:13 AM
6	Cosmo says it's bad that men get turned on during sex... Spotted the delusional Communist/Marxist apologist.	/r/MensRights	04/11/17 02:01 AM
1	CNN released a 12 minute report about this subreddit I've been frozen in inaction on this since it was worth a couple bucks a coin... I have regret. But at this point, the game is different	/r/TheRedPill	03/11/17 04:35 AM
3	In 2010, Sweden scrapped affirmative action in colleges because it ended up favouring men, as women outnumbered them: ''The education system should open doors – not shut them in the face of young women who are motivated to study'' I'm not being sarcastic. That's their explicit mission: Equality of outcome by way of arbitrary, unfair and thus inequitable treatment.	/r/MensRights	31/07/17 07:08 PM
-7	In 2010, Sweden scrapped affirmative action in colleges because it ended up favouring men, as women outnumbered them: ''The education system should open doors – not shut them in the face of young women who are motivated to study'' Inequity denotes supremacy, obviously. Equality is an intangible ideal.	/r/MensRights	31/07/17 04:11 PM
6	In 2010, Sweden scrapped affirmative action in colleges because it ended up favouring men, as women outnumbered them: ''The education system should open doors – not shut them in the face of young women who are motivated to study'' Sure it is. It's the pursuit of equality through the means of inequity.	/r/MensRights	31/07/17 03:29 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 This is presuming the axiom that you've been working from, that because a handful of capitalist firms donated to feminist studies, that they dictate the curriculum. But they didn't and they don't today. And you have a massive amount of these professors that are anti-capitalists. And you have among many others, Christine Hoff Summers, a woman you cited as a reputable source a minute ago, telling you this. Yet you don't believe them. So no, my argument is not that capitalist interests are communis…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:37 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 It's just a terribly weak argument you're leaning on. Sorry dude.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:25 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 You're stuck in a false dichotomy, and you have little to no nuance to your argument. You started off saying modern feminism is liberal. My initial contention was with that absolutely ridiculous statement. The conversation has since turned into a fabricated dilemma, full of conspiracy theory, between capitalism and communism. I mean, I think the conversation has ran its course as far as its relevance to this sub. My thoughts on your dichotomy here are as follows: I'm a capitalist and I don't sup…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:22 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 I was never, at any point, talking about a "communist threat". I simply made the argument that most of the social science departments in our universities today, have been developing within an echo chamber since the 60s, a postmodern critique of everything "western", and predicating the epistemology of it - since postmodernism has none - on a Marxian framework of class struggle. That's it. And this is an opinion that is shared by a lot of university professors, most of whom feel threatened to spe…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:07 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 You're avoiding the elephant in the room - that I've refuted your argument that these sorts of "studies" are ideologically based on liberalism - so you can move the goal posts into arguing that it's of course Marxist, but that it's bankrolled by "capitalists" and therefore still liberal. You're doing some crazy backflips. There is no group called " the capitalists" - incidentally one of Marx's fallacies. There are only individuals, and the vast majority of private property owners, myself include…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:00 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Okay, I'm beginning to see where we're talking past one another. I don't care about what's "true Marxism" and what's not. I am aware of the contradiction in a bunch of privileged, majority white kids running around college campuses screaming about socio-economic injustice. But that's really beside the point that these ideas are intrinsically insidious, irrational, illiberal and come from a mixture of postmodern relativism and Marxist classism. I know they're not literally Marxists in that regard…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 09:47 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 They funded McKinnion's critique of marxism that made the bait and switch from class is a social construct to gender is a social construct. So they funded a woman who is the epitome of exactly the ideological underpinnings I'm talking about, that which you keep attempting to refute and call "liberal". You're making my point for me. Cristine Hoff Sommers and other feminists said the ford foundation funded modern feminism. Here's something else Christine Hoff Summers said: "When I originally start…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 09:26 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 From the link you just provided... For five decades women were lied to by being forced fed a myth that ran as follows: Betty Friedan was a typical housewife until she had an awakening which would culminate in the Feminine mystique. We know that this account is wholly false as Daniel Horowitz exposed her extensive links to the CPUSA which Friedan expended considerable energy trying to cover up. This isn’t entirely surprising considering that feminism is basically Marxism adjusted for gender, as m…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 09:03 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 All socialists and communists do that because they know liberalism and postmodernism are capitalist. Postmodernism is not an ethos, therefore it can't be capitalist. You have yet to substantiate that claim in any kind of way, other than suggesting that the father of it - a guy who employed and stood shoulder to shoulder with ultra-leftist socialists and communists through his most active years of work - later came to embrace aspects of neoliberalism in the strictly economic sense, in the later s…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 08:50 PM
1	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Modern feminism and race studies were funded by capitalist and anti-communist foundations. Even if true, it's utterly irrelevant when the subject matter they teach in their curriculum is up to its knees in repressive, identitarian bullshit - which isn't neoliberal, by the way. You are making excuses for intentionally starving people to death during the cold war. You can't blame capitalism for a trade embargo, if that's what you're getting at. That is about as ironic and contradictory as you can …	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 07:08 PM
5	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Did you learn how to make up fake quotations to strawman in college, too? Fuck, you're smart.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 05:46 PM
4	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 It's not my job to educate you, that's what college is for. Well I can't say I'm surprised that you ducked the question, but I didn't say it was your job either way. I asked you politely to participate in a public forum that you, up until this point anyways, were apparently only pretending to participate in. A simple "no" would be sufficient. Like, say, for example, the college class that OP was instinctively attacking out of hurt feelings and anti-intellectualism. The same one that you're insti…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 05:41 PM
3	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Its a good point to demonstrate how propagandized people that think the west is promoting marxism and communism are. "The West" isn't promoting Marxist power dynamics, its social science departments at its universities are, which is a surprisingly insulated community full of echo chambers. If we starve people in communist countries to death, why would we promote it in our own capitalist countries? I'm not going to even take the bait on the ridiculous notion of socialism's demise being anything o…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 05:27 PM
2	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 As I said, there are instances where the hedonism of postmodernism jives with neo-liberalism. But as your own link points out, postmodernism came from post-Marxist thinkers, who simply transposed the same power and class dynamics onto a framework that, for all intents and purposes, had no frame in that it made no epistemological arguments. Neo-liberalism also posits one of its strengths as being the fact that it can either preserve, or destroy institutions, based on a de facto democracy. The for…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 05:00 PM
2	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Right, its about labour market deregulation Among other deregulation, yes. and getting women to spend as much time in the work place as possible Non-sequitur. Neo-liberalism does not argue one way or the other, that anyone should spend as much time as possible in the work place. They also have to be brainwashed into seeing their relationship to men as compeditive (free market brainwashing). Not as a matter of neoliberal principles, they don't. Not as a matter of free market principles, they don'…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 04:12 PM
3	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Western capitalist countries limit food supplies and other trade to socialist countries, and do their best to topple the government. Completely irrelevant point, and quite a dated one. Yet the ideology funded by western capitalist interests taught on western campus's is marxist. "Capitalist interests" don't dictate curriculum in our universities, nor do they even fund them. The overwhelming majority of their funding comes from government at both the state and federal level. Postmodernism, identi…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 03:44 PM
13	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Substantiate for me the claim that all men have privileges over women, in a way that inherently disavows the counter claim that all women have privileges over men. If you can do that, your snobby comment might hold at least a little bit of water.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 03:10 PM
3	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 No it isn't. That couldn't be further from the truth. Neoliberal feminism is essentially libertarianism specifically for women, and actually has some decent arguments. This university, and virtually all others in the U.S are neo-Marxist. Your average social science classroom likely doesn't have a single person in it, who believes in any of the core fundamental values of neo-liberalism. Most modern feminists today, and certainly the curriculum coming out of our universities, is deeply anti-capita…	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 03:05 PM
-3	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Yeah, great idea. Let's encourage men to use even more resources that we already don't have, due to the constraints of supply and demand in a universal healthcare model.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 02:39 PM
12	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 Sounds like you should be more upset with your ability and competence in picking a husband and mate, rather than the institution of stay at home mothers, who do so willingly and spend enormous amounts of money in our economy.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 02:35 PM
1	It's bad if men don't care, and now it's also bad if men do care. WTF, feminists? \| Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm, and Why That's a Bad Thing Utter conjecture. Capitalism is not diametrically opposed to cooperation, nor working as a team. In fact, it's predicated on just that. The distinction being that it's organized by free individuals' choices, rather than government mandates.	/r/MensRights	24/03/17 03:20 PM
1	It's bad if men don't care, and now it's also bad if men do care. WTF, feminists? \| Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm, and Why That's a Bad Thing Economics is not a zero sum game, and you are not entitled to money simply because someone else has enough of it that they can afford to be unproductive - even though they're often very productive.	/r/MensRights	24/03/17 03:16 PM
31	#DraftOurDaughters Parody Clinton Ads Or maybe the world moves past that level of statism. There never should've been a draft to begin with. It flies in the face of everything this country is supposed to stand for, and has already been abused once.	/r/MensRights	28/10/16 08:32 PM
18	As a financially needy college student with exceptional academic merit, this is far too common and a contributing factor in keeping me back. Could you imagine the outrage if scholarships had "preference for male"? It's not relevant. Let women be grown adults and choose what they want to do on their own.	/r/MensRights	14/10/16 06:54 PM
2	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Well I agree with you on just about everything you said, except that capitalism is failing us. Capitalism being in bed with government is what's failing us, but that's a discussion for another sub.	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 07:19 PM
3	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Sounds like you're fighting both ends of the stupid spectrum. I can dig that.	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 06:15 PM
5	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Totally. At the same time, it would be completely socially-unacceptable to allow a mother (or parents, for argument's sake) to have a kid, and then provide them with no support whatsoever, with the assumption that "people will just learn not to make bad decisions", or some other logically-floppy idea, because that's just not how people work. You would have a lot of people with starving kids, parents who were mentally incapable of having kids, and basically just dead kids all around. Yeah, and I …	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 06:14 PM
3	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Side note: Why do you go to that sub? Yeeesh...	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 03:58 PM
10	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. This touches on the point that I was trying to make. You see, I can empathize with a lot of the intention behind socially "progressive" ideas. But unfortunately, in actual practice, it's sometimes very hard to reconcile what ostensibly seems like the "right" thing with cold, hard reality. At the end of the day, if you can't afford to raise a child and you have one anyway with the intention of collecting government assistance, you've essentially just stolen money from other people. Likewise, if y…	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 03:45 PM
0	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Ideally, I think your idea is spot on. This is on the surface, the most fair and egalitarian way to handle these situations. However, the unspoken argument that never seems to be brought up, is that the state does not want to grant men that freedom, because it's aware that it will have to subsidize even more single mothers than it already does. Women having babies that they can't afford to raise is affording them a purchasing power that they haven't actually earned. I think the reasons for why o…	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 03:36 PM
2	Selective Service and Women in Combat Utterly pragmatic and logical points.	/r/TheRedPill	17/06/16 05:54 AM
3	A red pill take on gun violence We have way more rights than the inhabitants of Europe as well. A concession of one "inalienable" right, sets precedence for the sanctity of all other "inalienable" rights. We ought not concede our ineptitude like children, but rise to the occasion. Violent crime drops every year, and has been for the past twenty-something years. Hold fast. Safety is a personal responsibility, not the duty of the state. Every individual owes it to themselves to know how to fight, how to protect and how to win. I…	/r/TheRedPill	17/06/16 05:32 AM
25	Old Navy Insults Fathers By Making Father’s Day About Women What waste of energy? Refusing to purchase goods from a company that you don't agree with is not a waste of energy. It's actually a very simple, efficient and pragmatic approach to the marketplace. It's not about changing anything, nor enacting revenge for some perceived offense. Those just happen to be possible consequences of your purchasing decisions. If they fail, so be it. If not, that's okay too because apparently others aren't bothered by it. But you don't have to wear it, and that's all …	/r/MensRights	12/06/16 04:07 AM
1	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected Well now we're getting into the minutiae of how he handled it, which I don't care much to delve into. Point was: Frank needed to have his card pulled, and that's what happened.	/r/TheRedPill	13/02/16 06:36 PM
2	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected But that's just it: He did walk away. He broke up with that girl shortly after. And he did so with his integrity intact, because the guy that arguably had equal SMV to OP, is now the sniveling, apologetic little rat that's trying to weasel out of a confrontation. OP came out on top in every measurable way, so long as you don't consider keeping a sub-par broad like Tiffany as an LTR a "victory".	/r/TheRedPill	13/02/16 03:26 PM
1	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected I think you're right insofar as you shouldn’t go around confronting everyone that hits on your woman, obviously. But if we're to break down why this instance stands out among others, you have to consider the dynamic of the relationship with Frank. Because Frank is not just an acquaintance that OP's woman just happened to run into. Frank is someone that he regularly spends time with, and has even entrusted to be his woman's supervisor at a job. Now, whether or not that was a good idea, is again, …	/r/TheRedPill	13/02/16 03:15 PM
5	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected Honestly if a friend does that shit then you're picking bad friends who are living on scarcity. Basically he's signalling he values the slight chance of pussy above a valuable friendship. Either that or the friendship is not that valuable at all. In that case this ain't a friend of OP. Moot point. Of course they're a shitty friend. Doesn't change the fact that it needs to be addressed. Dealing with this situation can't be confrontational. Instead he should bully Frank into submission by making a…	/r/TheRedPill	12/02/16 01:02 AM
5	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected I think there's a significant percentage of men around here, many of whom might be the self admitted former blue-pill-beta fellas, who stand to learn more about male interaction as it pertains to the realm outside of female influence altogether. Perhaps I'm speaking out of school, but I like to think TRP is more than "just" sexual strategy, and is an encompassing philosophy on manliness in general. Of course, I could be wrong about that, but I think it stands to reason that a man shouldn't base …	/r/TheRedPill	11/02/16 10:45 PM
2	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected Yes, you have a point, but you're still letting him know that he shouldn't compete with you for your GF, which in itself implies a lack of abundance, and, to be honest, social skills. You are, even if only deep inside, afraid of losing her. My friends constantly hit on each others' girls, I do it too, in a fun way. People flirt - that's the way it is. Eh, this is pussy shit. You're hamstering pacificism. If we were to extend this logic to its ultimate conclusion, everyone could blatantly flirt w…	/r/TheRedPill	11/02/16 08:47 PM
4	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected By giving the guy that attention you just raised his value since you acknowledged he is competition. You did his job. Even if he was a dwarfen hunchback your girlfriend will suddenly start thinking about why you give the guy the attention and even worse let your woman know about. This is a bit of a false premise. Addressing disrespect from someone does not inherently mean that you feel they are competition. If it's a matter of principle that you don't tolerate disrespect, then you have to do som…	/r/TheRedPill	11/02/16 07:59 PM
18	Don't Mate Guard but refuse to be disrespected I don't think you're taking into consideration the fact that OP works out with this guy. They interact with each other on a fairly regular basis. So let's assume, for sake of argument, that this has nothing to do with a woman. If one of your friends or acquaintances disrespects you behind your back, and you don't address it, you are without a doubt, acting cowardly and without integrity. There's just no two ways about it. That is pussy behavior. How all of this relates to a woman, and whether or…	/r/TheRedPill	11/02/16 07:39 PM
1	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS I was relying on the body of TRP here. I suppose this is why I think you need more sidebar time. If you believe it is productive to argue logic with a woman over a relationship issue, you clearly haven't read enough. It's pretty basic TRP. I agree that it isn't productive to run through a logical discourse with a woman to get her to see your side of things. This is obviously an example of losing frame. But that is precisely why there exists no debate. You are telling her what it is, how it is, w…	/r/TheRedPill	19/01/16 08:52 PM
1	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS Tried to condense this, but still too long. I broke it into two replies. You are missing the point. You may have won that point, but they now view you are the enemy. I agree that this is possible, and even highly probable in the right context, but I think it's a sweeping generalization to assume this is the inevitable outcome of any ultimatum. I think there is a way to discern a righteous ultimatum from a pathetic one. You are taking the wrong meaning. That is reference to being credentialled...…	/r/TheRedPill	19/01/16 08:52 PM
1	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS I'm telling you that you are delusional. Momentary compliance does not mean it worked. If they don't repeat the behavior, it worked. Simple as that. Now don't get me wrong, mind you, I'm not arguing that ultimatums are all equal, nor am I arguing that they should be relied upon to get shit done. At the end of the day, they should be very few and far between. If you're having to give out ultimatums, there's a good chance you're fucking up. However, there are exceptions to this general rule. No. I…	/r/TheRedPill	16/01/16 11:53 PM
0	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS They have worked wonders for me outside of relationships. They simply don't work with women. I'm telling you they do, because they have and I'm witness to it. If you're unwilling to state what substantiates your claim, you're merely using conjecture to argue a point. Yes. Yes, it is. You don't know what authority is. I do. Make the case that an ultimatum is an inherently unauthoratative thing to do, and you win this point. It is what you have to use when leadership fails. Guess which one women l…	/r/TheRedPill	16/01/16 01:39 AM
-1	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS If you displease me--next. That one is pretty easy. This is woefully unrealistic in an LTR, which is the only context where ultimatums are even applicable. There is no need to be a lawyer with this. There is no judge. There is no jury. You get to decide. Nevertheless, ultimatums TO WOMEN CONCERNING YOUR RELATIONSHIP always fail, even when you think you've won. Explain how giving an ultimatum is in any way analogous to a lawyer pleading a case to a judge and jury? Explain how giving an ultimatum …	/r/TheRedPill	15/01/16 12:48 AM
2	NEVER GIVE WOMEN ULTIMATUMS If you want the same affect of ultimatums without the mess, just make your you have well established rules ahead of any relationship and that you will drop the nukes at the first line crossed. You'll never be able to anticipate every rule and boundary that you need to set ahead of time. Life is dynamic and full of surprises. Beyond that, rules and boundaries will tend to be tested occassionally. In this event, the only acceptable course of action - and this is completely contextual - is to eithe…	/r/TheRedPill	14/01/16 10:46 PM
8	A look into why SJWs are censoring the Immigrant Rape Crisis. That had never occurred to me, actually. That's a hilarious observation.	/r/TheRedPill	14/01/16 07:38 PM
3	A look into why SJWs are censoring the Immigrant Rape Crisis. Liberalism is not necessarily cowardice. Liberalism for instance, can answer the question as to whether you think a particular freedom should be upheld for people, but what it can't answer is whether or not you're willing to rock and roll to protect that. Being liberal is not synonymous with being a pacifist or a moral relativist. I think people often tend to look at it that way, because the regressive left has hijacked the title.	/r/TheRedPill	14/01/16 07:37 PM
1	"Equality = Patriarchy" I don't believe in egalitarianism, I believe in patriarchy. Un-ironically. Gender equality is a lie and a bad dream. Egalitarianism is definitely the way to go, insofar as we're talking about legal rights, civil rights, economics, etc. As far as cultural attitudes towards genders go, it's a pipe dream at best. Guys who take offense to this pragmatic rationale, typically lead lives where they don't find themselves doing anything more than the women around them. It's not hard for instance, to imag…	/r/MensRights	30/12/15 03:58 AM
2	Over 17k people liked this so what I hear you saying is that as long as the victim lusts for their perpetrator it's ok? Bottom line is sex with a minor is wrong and appaling. For starters, you certainly are hearing what you want to hear. So you believe that my having sex with a woman in her late twenties, when I was 17 for instance, was appalling? Do you understand how out of touch with reality that sounds? Especially so, when you use such a dramatic word. It's laughable, really. No one was harmed. I had a great time. In …	/r/MensRights	23/12/15 09:23 PM
1	Over 17k people liked this There are a lot of pussies. It's hilarious to me that this subreddit is filled with grown men who are apparently in disbelief, or are otherwise appalled by the fact that even as rational, moral adults, some of us men can still think back and wish that a teacher might've given us a hummer after class. I don't support the ethical standard that it should be viewed as appropriate for a teacher to carry on a relationship with a student. I also don't support the sexual predation of children by adults.…	/r/MensRights	23/12/15 04:51 PM
3	Milo's Logic seems to fly out the window when MGM comes up. No, thats a statement of fact. The fact you don't like it doesnt mean ive arrived at some conclusion. You have apparently arrived at the conclusion that the law is an ethical one, seeing as you aren't criticising it. I am aware that it is legal, genius. The stance for what is acceptable for religion is an already existing precedent. Go look it up. Hey dumbass, I realize that. Hence why circumcision has been a perfectly legal practice for as long as it has. That's not the point, dummy. The point …	/r/MensRights	14/12/15 10:01 PM
1	Milo's Logic seems to fly out the window when MGM comes up. What a completely irrational conclusion. I guess that sets precedence then. The freedom to pratctice religion includes the right to impose mutilation on babies, so long as it's codified doctrine. Quite a few interesting routes we can take on that one. Sidenote: Is it within an individual's right to suck the baby's dick to clean it afterwards? I assume you're aware of this custom.	/r/MensRights	14/12/15 08:28 PM
1	Y'all Need to Watch Bill Burr. More like, "please don't embarrass yourself by being a pretentious cunt that thinks he knows what's best for other men."	/r/TheRedPill	04/12/15 08:45 PM
2	Y'all Need to Watch Bill Burr. Relax man. Super relaxed. Podcasts are just listening to people talk. It's not like you're listening to an act that's been prepared to be consistently funny. Your point? Unless you want to be a comedian, I really don't get the reasoning behind listening to a single comedian's podcast every day. The fact that you don't "get" why people enjoy a particular podcast, is not a rationale for telling people that they're wasting their time listening to it, and that they need to find something else to do.…	/r/TheRedPill	04/12/15 10:24 AM
6	Y'all Need to Watch Bill Burr. If you're listening to the podcast of a comedian, you need a new interest. Yeah, or not. What a matter-of-fact way to state such a completely arbitrary opinion. Thanks or the tip internet dad, but some of us are established enough to enjoy laughter.	/r/TheRedPill	04/12/15 07:18 AM
3	Told her we would never be anything, the act dropped IMMEDIATELY [FR] Why does anything she did or said bother you? I would find all of this hilarious.	/r/TheRedPill	03/12/15 07:26 PM
3	How do you be strong, silent, and mysterious yet still be an interesting conversationalist? I think a lot of the down votes are defensiveness, and it's not like I said it in a nice way, but you're exactly right. Now I'm sure it's obvious, but full disclosure- I think red pill views are completely toxic and antithetical to forming valuable, strong, mutually respectful relationships. So I can't help but feel truly sad for a lot of these young guys who are clearly anti social and are just groping maddeningly for social hacks to form the type of relationships that they want. I don't agree …	/r/TheRedPill	03/12/15 05:09 AM
7	How do you be strong, silent, and mysterious yet still be an interesting conversationalist? I can't help but feel the same way. I think it's hilarious you caught so many downvotes for pointing it out. This thread is full of awkward, young, inexperienced men who are sharing "tricks and tips" on how to carry a simple fucking conversation. I read this shit and I'm like, fellas, how about we just go in there and say what we feel like saying in the moment? You can strategize all day about how a conversation with a woman will play out, but once you're in the moment, you will inevitably have …	/r/TheRedPill	03/12/15 12:38 AM
1	Guy is secretly loaded with cash but does not tell his gf, she leaves him then finds out from his friends that he has been hiding his wealth from her (hamestering ensues) Re-Post The story of a woman scorned, because she realized that love is not equated with hypergamy. How precious. Good riddance.	/r/TheRedPill	14/10/15 08:20 AM
3	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! There was literally nothing in his post that indicated he has any kind of use for this woman, other than to enjoy the freak show. There was literally nothing in his post that indicated he had fallen for any of her tricks, and to the contrary actually, he was pretty explicit about pointing them out. If you're wondering why you're having to defend your comment to so many people, that's the reason you're having to defend your comment to so many people.	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 08:03 PM
4	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! It's a shame that you interpret my posts to be "tone policing", given the fact that my criticism was not about how you said something, but rather the content itself of what you said; which is ironically exactly what you did to OP. And that's fine, if you ask me. That's the point of a forum: to have discussions and debates like gentleman. But let's get something straight with your wagging of the finger and your pandering to authority figures around here, I couldn't give a fuck about worrying that…	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 07:42 PM
4	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! In one breath you say his ego protection is dripping off of him, and in the next you say - speaking quite to my point, actually - that he is his only judge and that he hasn't been protecting his ego. I don't follow the inconsistency here. In any event, I'm just making the point that it seems rather petty and lame for so many of you in this thread to have chosen to take his story as an opportunity to tell him he's fucking up, regardless of the fact that you have very little reason to do so beyond…	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 06:38 PM
9	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! They're just booing him because they've never had the opportunity to meet someone so intriguingly nuts, and wouldn't know how to handle it if they did, other than running the other way. They are intrigued themelves, and are projecting their insecurities on OP by assuming that he is not in control of his situation.	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 06:37 PM
33	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! There's a lot of insecure dudes shitting on you for sharing this because their defense mechanism is to interpret your motivation to be bragging. Don't pay them any attention. Just stay in your frame. Only you know why you're studying this broad.	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 06:23 PM
20	[FR] This crazy playboy girl I met has a SLAVE! There's always the guy like you on TRP, who is just waiting for your chance to judge a man and lace them up with just how "wrong" they're doing it. Don't be a lame ass, and don't assume. The man has just stumbled across one of the most interesting characters that he'll ever meet in his life. If he wants to hang around her a few times to revel in her absolutely bat shit crazy life - and life perspective, for that matter - then let the kid do his thing for fuck's sake. Dude has just admittedly emb…	/r/TheRedPill	24/09/15 06:16 PM
7	Manginas and entitled bitches are everywhere Lol you are going to get your ass handed to you repeatedly as you get older. We'll, three things on that: For one, I think the idea of losing a fight is apparently much more troubling to you than it is to me. Secondly, most people are pretty polite and reasonable about taking people's space. It's not often that you'll find people willing to come sit at your table and steal your chairs in the first place, let alone tell you to go fuck yourself if you politely explain that it's taken already by so…	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/15 01:08 AM
8	Manginas and entitled bitches are everywhere If my mom stood up in a crowded event where the seating was public, yes I'd let some skank snag her chair. I'd give my mom my chair. And then you'd be standing around without a chair like an idiot, just because you wanted to avoid a mild confrontation, which in all likelihood would have gone down a lot smoother than OP's. I'm just not on board with allowing people to blatantly disrespect me. Do unto others, ya know? That's why OP was righteous. If I want my own chair, I pay for it. That's why Go…	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/15 12:48 AM
0	Manginas and entitled bitches are everywhere You should never initiate any physical contact. If you're scared of jail, that is.	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/15 12:36 AM
3	Manginas and entitled bitches are everywhere Not worth blowing your cool over. I'd have let the skank sit down and I'd have quietly asked her how many herpes she has and if she got her AIDS from banging gay dudes when she's this drunk. I don't think he necessarily blew his cool at all. And honestly, running your mouth about AIDS and herpes is childish, little boy behavior. That's some stupid shit. Get her annoyed enough to bail or at least stand up so I could put my foot on her chair. Seriously dude? Personally, if my girl gets up, her sea…	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/15 12:28 AM
2	I want to thank each and every one of you. He did say what he meant and nothing more.	/r/TheRedPill	07/09/15 07:25 PM
8	Two Female Teachers Busted On A Threesome With A 16-Year-Old Male Student: Prosecutors Still Cannot Make Up Their Minds Whether They Will Face Charges This dude gets it.	/r/MensRights	23/08/15 12:02 PM
-1	Two Female Teachers Busted On A Threesome With A 16-Year-Old Male Student: Prosecutors Still Cannot Make Up Their Minds Whether They Will Face Charges Nonconsensual sex that the boy carried on with for a year and bragged about to all of his friends.	/r/MensRights	23/08/15 11:59 AM
0	"Predator" teacher Jennifer Fichter gets 22 years in prison for sex with three 17 year-old male students Sure, I can consent to having sex with my boss and they can consent to it with me but it's not truly consensual sex when one party is in authority. I cannot totally consent to that person since I am in a junior position. Where are you getting this definition of consent? Certainly not in a dictionary. All of these things you're talking about are arbitrary connotations that you're adding to the word.	/r/MensRights	04/07/15 07:10 AM
-1	"Predator" teacher Jennifer Fichter gets 22 years in prison for sex with three 17 year-old male students The definiton of consent does not imply anything about people being peers, and that isn't necessarily relevant. Furthermore, the happenstance that one party might be in a position of authority over the other, does not necessarily negate the other party's free agency. I can't choose to have sex with my boss without taking responsibility for it. I can't give a police officer consent to search my car, and then argue in court that I did not have the agency to give consent because the officer is in a…	/r/MensRights	04/07/15 05:44 AM
-1	"Predator" teacher Jennifer Fichter gets 22 years in prison for sex with three 17 year-old male students Sure, the point being that the definition of consensual does not change with the borders of states, in any other way than an arbitrary legal one. It was still consensual sex, whether Florida recognizes it or not.	/r/MensRights	04/07/15 02:12 AM
2	"Predator" teacher Jennifer Fichter gets 22 years in prison for sex with three 17 year-old male students It was though, and the only question really, is what state a 17 year old is giving consent in.	/r/MensRights	04/07/15 02:07 AM
0	"It Didn't Mean Anything!" Like must other doctrines of feminism, encouraging women to pursue casual sex is in direct opposition to women's legitimate best interests. Is it though? Seems like it's only against their best interests if you consider those to be being successfully hypergamous and socially accepted. But who cares really? A slut is going to be a slut. I'm not sure it's in our interest as men to encourage them either way. If you're trying to find an LTR, it's only in your interest to choose wisely, not to worry …	/r/TheRedPill	25/06/15 02:45 PM
0	"It Didn't Mean Anything!" I see I've been downvoted, but I fail to see you or anyone else refute my logic. I also find it interesting that we're pretty much in agreement about everything other than this extra focus and attention being brought to the woman being a shitty person, not just for the simple fact that she cheated on OP and dishonored an agreement, but because she did it with a "drug dealing loser". What exactly does that aspect of the story have anything to do with it? Why is that relevant to TRP? Why should an…	/r/TheRedPill	25/06/15 02:10 PM
-3	"It Didn't Mean Anything!" Buddy, here's your problem... For one, you're attacking a straw man by saying that I'm hamstering to justify the woman's behavior. I have made it very clear that the woman was disrespectful and that she was hamstering in trying to excuse her behavior. She was in the wrong. Hence, OP was righteous in his decision and course of action. So right there, you can drop your ridiculous straw man argument. Secondly, OP obviously did not subscribe to your way of looking at sex (i.e. a magical, deep connec…	/r/TheRedPill	24/06/15 10:55 PM
-1	"It Didn't Mean Anything!" Did you read the story? OP regarded the entire relationship as a short, 6 month fling for spring from the get go. There was never any love there in the story. The entire thing was an arrangement of convenience. OP's decision was made based off of the simple disrespect of her actions, not because he regarded some deep, spiritual connection had been betrayed. There never was such a connection. My point was that it doesn't matter who found what to be meaningful or meaningless, and that women are no…	/r/TheRedPill	24/06/15 09:47 PM
-5	"It Didn't Mean Anything!" There is hamstering apparent in her justification for why what she did is "okay", or "not a big deal". However, I think it's inaccurate to say that women are more likely to regard casual sex as meaningless. In fact, I think it's far more typical for it to be the other way around. This aspect of your dissection seems like it's coming from a place of hurt, and not from a logical and objective place of observation. The truth is that the sex that woman engaged in with the pot dealer WAS meaningless.…	/r/TheRedPill	24/06/15 09:02 PM
3	Italian hedge fund manager: 'Never, ever marry an American woman' No they're not. They're not behaving like men AT ALL. Promiscuity is not the end all, be all of what defines whether a person is acting like a man or not. FAR from it, actually. To say that women are acting more like men pretty boldly stands in the face of everything red pill is trying to make you privy of. I don't know one single woman who acts anything like I do. You should be able to say the same.	/r/TheRedPill	18/06/15 05:15 AM
1	Italian hedge fund manager: 'Never, ever marry an American woman' What're you talking about? A lot of people say that. Sexual liberation and freedom is not something to be frowned upon or shamed. There's no use shaming women for wanting to be promiscuous, it's just up to YOU to decide whether you want to cuff a woman like that or not. Some of y'all are stuck subconsciously playing into the woman's game of hypergamy, by telling women they're stupid for choosing to be promiscuous. It's like you're trying to help them be more successful at their hypergamy. They'r…	/r/TheRedPill	18/06/15 05:10 AM
122	"There Is No Rape Culture in the West": She held up that sign at SlutWalk, and this is what happened My favorite part was the end, where the woman asked the reporter not to show footage of the interviews of a few particular people, to which the reporter said that she may or may not, but that consent had already been given and the interview already had already taken place. The woman hassling the reporter then made the comment that, "that's interesting", and drew a comparison to the idea of sexual consent. Of course when the reporter extrapolated her horrible logic to its conclusion in how that w…	/r/TheRedPill	10/06/15 08:23 PM
13	I am Karen Straughan [girlwriteswhat]; Ask Me Anything. You sound like a hell of a mom.	/r/TheRedPill	29/05/15 07:08 PM
2	[FR] LTR shit tests and treating her like a child Quit harassing the man and find something productive to do.	/r/TheRedPill	29/01/15 09:07 PM
3	Beta, sexless man from /r/deadbedrooms accidentally discovers dread game and, big surprise, it's working. That's a strawman. He never said he talked a certain way because of "xyz", he said he's not going to STOP talking a certain way just because "xyz".	/r/TheRedPill	23/01/15 09:14 PM
2	35 year old female teacher who sexually abused 15 yo student breaks down in court claiming she is the victim. Does that 17 year old want this "justice" though? I think that is an important distinction to make. I would love to see a study done on "victims" of teacher-student relationships, asking their opinions well into the future, after they've grown and matured into adults. I surmise that the outcome would find that both men and women alike, do not find "justice" was served that their consensual partners, albeit older and professionally inappropriate, were incarcerated and/or forced to register as sex…	/r/MensRights	21/12/14 04:59 PM