| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | God forbid a man be around children...Your argument would ONLY work if she was a landlord of some sort for a business. She is renting out A ROOM in her house. Fucking Wikipedia too? For real?? You are googling terms. You arent even bothering to include the other details. Your links prove nothing. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 07:25 AM |
| 1 | God forbid a man be around children...Your links have no relevance to a personal household. Jesus. Habe you ever taken a class that teaches how to correctly form an argument. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 07:23 AM |
| 1 | God forbid a man be around children...I also think you are confusing company laws and an individual's rights. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 07:22 AM |
| 2 | God forbid a man be around children...Not on craigslist. On facebook you can do whateber the hell you want. You can say you only want a woman in housing in your own home. Explain to me how student living apartments which I used to be a manager for one get away with having gender based room selection. People(assuming this is her home) can have and advertise whatever bias they want. Make up something else to pretend you know about please. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 07:20 AM |
| 2 | God forbid a man be around children...Did you even read his response? If she owns the home she can discriminate for anything prior to the rental agreement. It would only be illegal after to impose a bias. This isn't a fair housing laws company you are talking about. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 05:49 AM |
| 1 | God forbid a man be around children...It is completely illegal for an individual to have gender bias? Strange that individuals can legally have every other kind of bias... | /r/MensRights | 19/06/13 05:47 AM |
| 2 | I thought you all might appreciate this.That is EXPOSING THE PROBLEM. The laws are not just. That should be included. That is the point of this message. Jeeze. You are proving against your own point. The picture illustrates man taking control of woman, woman taking control of man, man taking control of man, and woman taking control of woman. All of these things are wrong when unwanted. The laws (as you have mentioned) do not protect from certain instances where someone is circumstantially forced to do something they do not want; BUT T… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/13 01:40 PM |
| 1 | I thought you all might appreciate this.Great. You pull that definition off the internet? There are many forms of rape (unwanted intercourse) in most legal systems. I've read at least 6 comments of yours on this thread and you base your arguments on semantics (the wording). You are clearly missing the point. Is logical thought that hard for you? | /r/MensRights | 01/06/13 12:09 PM |
| 1 | I thought you all might appreciate this.This is just a single idea of equality being expressed, is he supposed to include every topic in the world related to equality in one post? | /r/MensRights | 01/06/13 12:05 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter