TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WashWithaRagonaStick Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by WashWithaRagonaStick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She needs to hear the sound of 1 hand clapping.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:41 PM
2

It's a chimp out.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/19 05:18 PM
-2

Or, you could hire some street justice while you're having a pleasant dinner with lots of family and friends.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:58 PM
1

It's not a study. It's a self-reporting survey.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:21 PM
2

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/bryan-cranston-talks-last-flag-flying-why-he-isnt-rooting-trumps-failure-1052844?utm_source=twitter Bryan Cranston: "It’s just astonishing to me. President Trump is not the person who I wanted to be in that office, and I’ve been very open about that. That being said, he is the president. If he fails, the country is in jeopardy. It would be egotistical for anyone to say, “I hope he fails.” To that person I would say, fuck you. Why would you want that? So you…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:33 PM
1

GFY, it will be a testament to your presumed athleticism and flexibility.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:49 PM
29

Cardi B is a rapist, a thief, a drug addict, fugly and a whore.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:10 PM
6

https://www.txcourts.gov/about-texas-courts/courts-of-appeals/ If you miss the 30-day deadline for vacating a default decree, you can request a new trial within 30 days after the judge signs the decree. If you go to trial and the terms of the judge’s decree overlook a point of law or a piece of evidence, you can file an appeal. You have 20 days after the judge signs the decree to do this. If you requested a trial by jury and you suspect jury tampering or error, or if new evidence has come to lig…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:38 PM
15

He'll win on appeal. They're not legally married if she's a bigamist.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:39 PM
1

And everyone wonders why so few people want to be with with women "like this".
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/19 06:05 PM
5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNAfvaJEOF4 Chris Rock: OJ Simpson, I understand
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:50 PM
6

No, but if you're judged guilty absent the presentation of actual facts and evidence that is a significant problem. The mere accusation, legitimate or not, can destroy a career or imprison someone. If it couldn't then we would have no need for the Innocence Project, etc. There are 3 types of accusations: Legitimate accusations by actual victims, those who "perceive" they have been harassed and have not been and those who are looking to punish someone and get even for perceived transgressions to …
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:52 PM
8

Ridiculous, narcissistic, delusional, irrational bar hag.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:36 AM
3

WTF?!
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:13 PM
7

Name and shame her.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:35 PM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:48 PM
0

It's a pleasure, you fat POS loser.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:27 PM
3

You scientifically illiterate dimwit. Biology/Chromosomes determine whether it's a woman or a man, not the installation of the frankencock or frankenvagina, you imbecile.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 09:28 PM
1

Horse shit.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 09:25 PM
1

That's the most intellectually bankrupt, ignorant comment you could possibly make.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 08:49 PM
1

Lets be honest, that fat hag couldn't catch a dick if she walked naked into a men's prison with an 8ball of coke and a fistful of pardons. Lol
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:40 PM
1

They're stupid, just as you are. I love my girlfriend but I'd never marry without a prenuptial agreement. There is no advantage, half-wit.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:28 PM
0

That's not data regarding "freedom". You wear your ass like a well fitted hat, imbecile.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:21 PM
0

There is no data, evidence or studies to support your ridiculous, unscientific assertion. You're a half-wit. Enjoy hell and poverty. :)
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:59 PM
0

If you're so goddamn stupid you want to get married, without a prenuptial agreement and are willing to part with more than 50% of your assets that's your problem. :)
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:57 PM
1

54% divorce rate is more than ample example. https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:54 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:17 PM
0

So, still no facts or data to support your ridiculous, fallacious assertion. Good to know. Enjoy masturbation. :)
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:17 PM
0

Another ironic comment. Support your claims that valid, legal "prenups are fundamentally worthless". Prove your comment or STFU and crawl back under your paid sex rock you came from because that's the only way you'll ever get laid.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:16 PM
0

I don't suffer fools.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:14 AM
0

You delusional fucking MGTOW half-wit of an uneducated imbecile. Jesus christ, you're an uneducated, delusional woman hating idiot. Grow up and lose some weight and your virginity. :)
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:51 AM
-1

Yes, I actually do and you clearly don't. Get a grip. Child support is NOT governed under a prenuptial agreement. Unlike you, I actually know WTF I'm talking about. That tinfoil hat you're wearing is cutting off the blood flow to your @ss.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:03 AM
-1

No. They're. Not. That's an uninformed, unsubstantiated assertion by someone who clearly doesn't know WTF they're talking about. The elements that can render a prenuptial agreement invalid are: Waiver of child support within the agreement. Unconscionable clauses contained within it such as not allowing the party with no assets to receive any economic distribution at the end of the marriage. Requiring it be signed under duress or coercion. Such as giving it to someone on the eve of a wedding and …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:06 PM
8

I agree but a prenuptial agreement is mandatory, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:49 PM
0

So, you have no empirical data or legitimate studies to support your assertion. Good to know!
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:17 PM
-2

You're the rare exception, which proves the rule.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:16 PM
3

One of my CPA's didn't have sex with his former spouse for over 10 years, after the birth of their only child. He started, discreetly, getting side pieces which I support. She found out and had a meltdown, which she had no right to as she unilaterally decided to check out and, tacitly, gave him approval to fuck whomever he wanted.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:14 PM
2

I do, have a prenuptial agreement and DTMFB. It is that simple.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:11 PM
28

Color me unsurprised. I had a prenuptial agreement which protected me when I filed for divorce and have a great girlfriend now. There is no benefit to marriage, for a man, only significant financial risk.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:10 PM
9

It does demonstrate he's better off without his wife, for many reasons.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:55 PM
2

Good christ, that's a hideous thing.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:59 PM
125

Almost half the world watched the men’s 2018 World Cup, with nearly 3.6 billion total viewers tuning in to watch some part of the tournament. The final match alone reached an audience of over 1.1 billion people. Subsequently, the tournament’s sponsor, FIFA, brought in a profit of over $6 billion. The women’s team garners significant but substantially lower viewership. We don’t have current data yet for the 2019 tournament, but during the women’s last World Cup in 2015, 764 million viewers tuned …
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:48 PM
-3

His "mother" is despicable. I hope he cut her out of his life, forever. He was a child.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter