TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WaterKeys Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by WaterKeys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree, and I try to speak up when I can. For a lot of us early in our career though it’s tough. I’ve spent my entire life trying to make this career and I’m in several hundred thousand dollars of debt. It’s easy to say you’d do something, but it’s hard to risk it all in reality. I’d like you to think that once I’m more established I can make the changes I’d like to see.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:14 AM
3

Hey man, I’m also a physician. I just wanted to say that I know where you’re coming from, and I know how tough it is. There’s a lot of us that agree with you, but as you know, it’s really hard to speak up. The whole direction of the field is upsetting. I’d write more but I have a lot of notes to get to lol. I’m not always on Reddit, but I’m available if you ever feel like sending a DM to complain about the specifics.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 02:45 AM
3

I’m really sorry, I can’t even imagine. Also, I don’t mean to be saying you did anything wrong, you definitely did whatever you could at the time. I was mostly just writing that out because I know a lot of other people might be reading this, and I thought it might help someone in the future. I hope you’re doing better now.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:23 AM
7

Well, if the physician did not clearly discuss the risks, benefits, and alternatives with you, and give you a chance to ask questions or provide objections, that is also illegal. The physician in that case did not obtain informed consent and can most definitely be sued. With all due respect, ethically and legally an RN cannot obtain informed consent for a surgical procedure. They can hand you the form, and have you sign, BUT the physician cannot sign until they have consented you. I know people …
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:15 AM
8

I’m sorry that happened to you. I’m a physician, and that is not considered best practice, nor is it recommended as routine procedure by the American Urological Society. That is absurd that the physician or hospital would be willing to take on the massive legal risk of opposing one parents denial of consent for a non-medically necessary procedure. That is something you are taught to never, ever do. It’s mind-bogglingly risky, and as a physician you would have to be insane to ever risk that. Are …
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:10 AM
12

Thank you for laying this out so well. This is the correct interpretation. The “we all start female” myth is so frustrating. It’s simply not biologically correct. a physician
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:09 AM
2

I’ve spent pretty much my whole life studying/working in academia. It’s heavily political and one side is heavily entrenched. It’s very hard to get a professorship. You have to be willing to jump through any hoop. You would never be considered if you didn’t have the right politics. If you somehow sneak in then you would need to get funding for your research. This is heavily politically biased as well. If you somehow get past all that, you have to be publish your findings. Journals are heavily bi…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 05:19 PM
1

I’m sorry, I can’t understand this comment because of the poor grammar and lack of punctuation. I’m actually serious, like I’m not trying to be mean if English is your second language.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:20 AM
1

Do I know what caused racism? Thats how you sound.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:17 AM
11

I’ve first saw the anti-male feminism in academia, and later in the workplace. The misandrist attitude towards men in universities and the workplace is what brought me here, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:18 PM
8

Yea, I’m a doctor and I’ve never understood this argument. I’m at work so I can’t go into detail right now but - 1. Women’s diseases tend to be better funded. Breast cancer is the most funded cancer. Entire women’s health clinics exist. The obvious men don’t have autonomy over circumcision. Mutilation is forced on them while there is no equivalent for women. Woman are demanding that procedure be done for them, while men can’t even avoid unneeded procedures. Far more emphasis placed on women’s he…
/r/MensRights05/11/24 06:45 PM
2

Hi, I’m an American doctor. I’d send a message to your doctor that you don’t consent to a circumcision. Regardless of the specifics of the law, no doctor will perform a non-therapeutic circumcision with that in the chart. If there is documentation in the medical record that a parent does not consent to a non-medically necessary procedure, it opens the doctor up to obvious legal liability. As the doctor you can never be forced to perform a non emergent procedure, and it would be incredibly stupid…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:40 PM
6

So I happen to have a degree in neuroscience and a medical degree - not that degrees mean you are necessarily right. However, I can assure you that this is absolute bullshit. None of these claims have actually researched. They are making conjecture based on some ambiguous neuroanatomy to make some “cool science statements” to get clicks. It’s closer to phrenology than neuroscience.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 01:46 PM
1

It’s covered. We commonly do it at the same time as the mastectomy. It’s considered treatment for the cancer. I’m a surgery resident.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter