TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Waywards Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Waywards on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I didn't realize her taking/not taking her birth control pills was him "taking care" of his responsibility. Promising someone a life you know they will never have, just to cruelly manipulate them, is not any better than betraying the deep and intimate trust he had in her. Two wrongs do not make a right.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:22 PM
-9

Putting your dick in crazy and having an unwanted pregnancy is unfortunate, maybe, but it's not slavery. And it's pretty disrespectful to the history and modern reality of slavery to compare child support payments to it.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 06:17 PM
-10

How is this any better than the lies she told him?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:52 PM
3

So you think, in the entire world, of all 3.5 billion women, there's not a one that would ever, under any situation, try to help you? Even if you think that little of women, don't you think there'd at least be a handful of CRAZY ladies that would try to eat that biker's eyeballs for breakfast. Statistics yo.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:27 AM
1

Maybe you misunderstood my comment? I didn't mention "school girls" at all. You also seemed to be discussing the female populous in general? I have no idea, but calling me insane is a bit much, Testicle.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:12 AM
2

I think the draft is stupid in general (and not just because it's sexist), so let's leave that aside. I guess I don't assume that the average victim of sexual harassment is being oversensitive or lying? Because, if I'm understanding you correctly, you think as long as someone isn't actually threatened it doesn't matter if they feel threatened? I think feeling threatened really affects they way you behave in life, and should have validity in arguments of security, comfort and safety. Maybe that's…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:10 AM
7

I think it's unrealistic to expect every single organization to focus on protecting/uplifting every single kind of person. While I totally agree with your statement that all people deserve a promise of solidarity against violence, that doesn't mean every organization needs to focus on everyone. It's okay that there's an oath just for women. It's okay if there's an oath just for men, or children, or people who wear hats on Thursdays. As long as well all agree that violence against others is deplo…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:09 PM
2

None? Really? Not a single woman in all the earth? Harsh.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:06 PM
1

So, you think some sexual harassment is just mean words? Ok, say it is just words/verbal attacks. If those words make someone feel threatened or unsafe, that's harassment. And persistant harassment is, while maybe not "oppression" per say, pretty damn awful. Not every woman can just brush off the comments of lewd men, and just because you think they're being hypersensitive doesn't mean their emotions aren't valid and real. Is it really asking for "special treatment" when you ask someone not to y…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:01 PM
2

I just think that everyone should be responsible for their own reproduction. Part of that means either trusting your partner to take care of it (and accepting the outcomes thereof) or take matters into your own hands (and use a condom). I suppose guys have some credibility in the whole "condoms ruin sex" situation, but it's not like women enjoy messing with their hormones either. Either way, anyone who doesn't want a baby should take direct responsibility for that, not put it on someone else and…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 11:06 PM
4

I think everyone should be responsible for their own fertility. Men and women both. If you really don't want kids... maybe don't trust someone else to handle your most important priorities? Srsly though, if you don't want a baby, wear a condom or snip the tubes. Don't rely on someone else to carry out your wishes and be surprised when they don't.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 05:35 PM
1

Well, not really? In theory, as people continue to be more economically productive and produce greater value in less time (in keeping with economic trends) then fewer hours working can still fund more expensive social programs. The problem is that's like 50-100 years away, and no one values parenting as much as they do money. And others are shocked that they would have to "subsidize" other people's choices, when in reality they are already experiencing externalized effects of peoples breeding an…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:49 AM
1

I just think it would be awesome if we decided children are important and valuable enough that we want to help people afford having a stay at home parent. I mean, I already said it's an unrealistic situation, because it would cost the government like... 3-4 trillion a year, more than they take in annually in taxes. I just think it would be a good way to support better education and care-taking for our future generations. Also...what does parenting have to do with immigration?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 11:52 AM
1

So, first thing you do is call logical fallacy, and then go all ad hominem. Whatever, Donkey Schlong. I wrote out some of my thoughts below, but I feel like no matter what I say, you've already decided you're not gonna change your mind. I feel like your argument is "Women are bad people, and don't deserve support for doing something they're going to do anyway". Am I understanding you correctly on that? That it would incentives them to breed? And that a woman who wants children will, through some…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 11:49 AM
2

But, you benefit from other people having babies. People (and population increase) is needed for our capitalist economy and the way we structure society. You, as a "non-breeder" should pay them for that service.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:48 AM
-1

From a theoretical stand point, I think stay at home parents deserve free money from taxpayers. If we can guarantee stay at home parents, say, 80% of the last salary they held before breeding, I think more people could afford to be stay at home parents. Which would be good, in my opinion, for society in general. As far as where the money would come from, well, I don't know. Edit: It would also probably be necessary to make it a rule that only one parent per household can use this free money, and…
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter