~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -9 | A lot of people say that misogyny kills, but how common are incidents where someone kills a woman and it is explicitly done because of hatred of women?Ok, you genuinely have no idea what you're talking about and you don't understand the justice system at all... Going to stop replying here because you either aren't reading what I'm saying or you lack the reading comprehension to understand what I'm saying... | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 06:07 PM |
| -5 | A lot of people say that misogyny kills, but how common are incidents where someone kills a woman and it is explicitly done because of hatred of women?Hate crimes aren't fundamentally worse than other crimes, they're just different and should be classified as so because different laws have been broken. It is important to record such crimes as hate because it helps said communities victimised to 1) understand potential threats against them and 2) it allows us to prevent hate crimes from happening by providing education about different communities in schools, prisons etc. therefore stopping a crime from even taking place. You also misunderstood … | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 05:45 PM |
| -1 | A lot of people say that misogyny kills, but how common are incidents where someone kills a woman and it is explicitly done because of hatred of women?We classify crimes based on the perpetrators motivation, violent crimes committed against an individual based on their gender, sexual orientation, race etc. are classified as hate crimes because violence was committed due to the victims traits. It isn't difficult at all for authorities to understand whether a crime was committed due to prejudice, there is usually a significant amount of evidence, usually on their internet history. Look at Elliot Rogers, his online footprint made it very clear th… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 05:22 PM |
| -1 | Why Gen Z Men and Women Can’t Find Each OtherThat's a 10 year study that used one census from 1980 and one 5 year survey... It's not a brilliant study. Whereas, the overall consensus is that men and women tend to marry within their socioeconomic status 🤷 | /r/MensRights | 11/07/26 11:47 AM |
| -10 | Why Gen Z Men and Women Can’t Find Each OtherThe vast majority of men and women marry within their socioeconomic status, have the same/ or similar education levels and the same religious beliefs. Where are you getting that women have 'hypergamous desires'? Marriage data doesn't reflect this at all. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 05:37 PM |
| 2 | Men should boycott Disney, Disneyland.I just told you that in the last 2 years, over half of Disney films feature male protagonists... Are you even reading what I'm saying? lol There's lots of reasons why boys and men have stopped engaging in Disney films, one of the main reasons being 'superhero fatigue', Disney came out with too many films and shows directed at men and boys and they lost interest 🤷 You're statistically completely wrong, there have been more films in the last few years with male protagonists compared to female. I'm… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 02:16 PM |
| 3 | Men should boycott Disney, Disneyland.Current adults grew up with at least 70% of the films I listed, I feel like you're a child if you genuinely believe all the films I listed are old. Also, most have had very recent remakes or sequels i.e. Wreck it Ralph 2, Peter Pan (30+ different films/ remakes), Toy Story 5, The lion King live action remake, the Jungle Book live action remake.... I could go on. Anyway, Disney Studios have released 17 films since 2024, 9 of which feature male protagonists (thats over 50%). Films such as Starwars… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 02:01 PM |
| 0 | Men should boycott Disney, Disneyland.How can a girl relate to a princess who was kidnapped as a baby because of her magical hair that keeps people young and healthy? How can a girl relate to a woman who was held hostage by a giant beast? How can a girl relate to a woman who was turned into a frog? ....Almost like children enjoy children's films regardless of how relatable they may or may not be. I feel like you just want to be angry, I've told you that around 60% of Disney films have a male protagonist and 60% of the most popular D… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 01:41 PM |
| 3 | Men should boycott Disney, Disneyland.Around 70% of the films I listed came out after 1990 and around 40% came out after 2000... The majority of adults grew up with these films and the vast majority are incredibly popular and have had numerous remakes. Unless you're a literal child, you would have grown up with these very popular and well known films. 4 of the top 10 most popular Disney films have a female protagonist, 6 have a male protagonist. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls000422381/ | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 01:03 PM |
| 0 | Men should boycott Disney, Disneyland.Men are overwhelmingly represented in media, in the top grossing films, they make up two thirds of speaking roles and 57% of protagonists. Even in Disney and Pixar films, men make up around 60% of protagonists. You seriously couldn't find enough Disney films about men and boys? What about Jungle Book, Aladdin, Pinocchio, Peter Pan, Tarzan, The Lion King, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, The Emperors New Groove, Treasure Planet, Wreck it Ralph, Big Hero 6, Meet the Robinsons, Robin Hood, Br… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:50 PM |
| -5 | Is female narcissism much more common than statistics say?A diagnosis doesn't only classify 'obvious extreme cases', they acknowledge that it is on a spectrum and most, if not all people, have some degree of narcissistic traits. However, there is a very clear difference between the average person with a narcissistic trait and someone who is a narcissist with a personality disorder. Based on this post and your response, you don't seem to understand what a personality disorder is and even if you did understand, you don't care. Why speak about something w… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 04:36 PM |
| -6 | Is female narcissism much more common than statistics say?Narcissism is an incredibly rare personality disorder, with many sources estimating that is impacts 1% of the population. Diagnosing it can be incredibly complex, often taking years to officially diagnose an individual. I hate how people throw around terms like narcissism when they don't understand the first thing about the disorder. No, the shitty person you met most likely isn't a narcissist, they're just a shitty person. People with narcissistic personality disorder often appear incredibly ch… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/26 03:36 PM |
| -1 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Interesting how you ignored all my points regarding your “evidence” lol Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:32 PM |
| -1 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Quite impossible to be upset over 'the sheer amount of supporting evidence' when you haven't provided any appropriate forms of evidence You're obviously not interested in engaging in a conversation but rather seek to bombard an individual with dozens of links that they can't possible refute because, quite simply, no one has the time to individually verify god knows how many sources and accurately respond to all of them it's called a Gish Gallop rhetorical technique and is widely looked down upon | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:15 PM |
| -5 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Have you ever had a debate outside of the internet? Have you ever watched a formal debate? Do you really think a moderator would allow an individual to send dozens of links as evidence? And do you think they would class that as a legitimate form of evidence? Genuine questions | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 07:46 PM |
| -3 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Linking to a past reddit comment that includes dozens of links that no sane person would go through, respond to and verify for a reddit debate isn't 'copious evidence'. It's just overwhelming someone with links which could be anything If you can't articulate your views in a concise manner then what's the point in even engaging? | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 06:51 PM |
| 1 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]I completely agree and there absolutely are issues that men face in society that do need to be addressed such as the mental health crisis, homelessness, countries that invoke the draft etc. Yet individuals who claim to care spend all of their time here, complaining about feminists. It would be laughable if it wasn't so damaging to both men and women Honestly, it seems like they all learnt how to debate from watching amateur debates on YouTube, the language many of them use reminds me of the 'cha… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 03:59 PM |
| -2 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]...Fighting for mens or women's rights is fundamentally about equality. You're fighting for equal rights. The Duluth Model is a theory from the early 1980s that has evolved significantly since then, domestic abuse laws are now gender neutral and acknowledge that anyone can be a victim. The creator of the Duluth Model has stated that the overall premise of the Duluth model is incorrect. That's how research works, we build from past theories that are now seen as incorrect. Not sure what the obsess… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 03:47 PM |
| -4 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]I read a book recently which actually brought me to this subreddit, Men Who Hate Women by Laura Bates. She goes into detail about how 'mens rights activists' core foundation is essentially attacking feminism, women who they perceive as feminist and relying on a victim mentality that views men as the true victims. It's a very interesting book and I'd definitely recommend it if you'd like to learn more about the mentality of the individuals who occupy this subreddit ((: It's incredibly accurate, f… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 02:09 PM |
| -4 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]It does seem that way, any anonymous account that identifies as a feminist = a representation of the entire feminist movement... It's almost like trying to explain to a child that people are individuals and share a wide range of perspectives that often contradict each other, even if they're in the same in-group | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 01:59 PM |
| -15 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Sorry, it is ridiculous to send dozens of links that a regular person just wouldn't have time to go through... I obviously can't respond to you because I'm a sane person that isn't going to go through every single news story | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 01:54 PM |
| -10 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]But you do, by fighting for mens rights, you're fighting for equality. Equality benefits both men and women, you're not fighting for mens rights to subjugate women, you're fighting for equality My point with that analogy is that if someone told you that they care about animal welfare and they volunteer at a dog rescue because of this, you wouldn't then say that they obviously don't care about animals because they aren't helping cats. Individuals can care about gender equality while focusing on o… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 01:52 PM |
| -44 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Feminists stating they care about both issues doesn’t mean they should focus their attention on men though, it just means that they aren’t invalidating the issues men go through I’m sure many men’s rights activists care about women’s issues but that doesn’t mean this subreddit should focus on issues impacting women Just like employees at a dog rescue care about other animals but they don’t use resources meant for dogs to help cats, for example | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:45 AM |
| -49 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Why do you seemingly believe that feminists should centre men’s issues? Obviously, they focus on issues impacting women I don’t see any posts in this subreddit focusing on women’s issues | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:37 AM |
| 2 | No one really talks about how the "physically stronger" argument is extremely harmful to so many menRight, I never stated otherwise? You completely missed my point | /r/MensRights | 26/06/26 10:07 AM |
| 0 | No one really talks about how the "physically stronger" argument is extremely harmful to so many menSorry, you’re arguing against something I never stated. Women absolutely murder men and it’s a tragedy when it happens My entire point was just that it doesn’t make sense to compare men and women’s strength when discussing victimisation because a man’s biggest threat is another man, statistically I’m not saying one’s worse than the other, murder is awful regardless of the perpetrator | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 10:00 PM |
| -1 | No one really talks about how the "physically stronger" argument is extremely harmful to so many menI don't disagree with you that there are many ways to physically hurt someone that don't involve brute strength I was just pointing out that mentioning the average male strength in comparison to women when discussing victimisation doesn't make logical sense when it's mostly men murdering other men Obviously, being stronger than women doesn't make a difference when the biggest threat to a man is another man | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 08:00 PM |
| -4 | No one really talks about how the "physically stronger" argument is extremely harmful to so many menThat argument doesn’t mean much when over 90% of male murder victims are murdered by men. Obviously, being on average stronger than women means little when men are being victimised by other men | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 06:38 PM |
| -3 | Never become a "Step Father"All relationships carry risk, everyone knows that. You’ve made a lot of assumptions in your post that are far from true for many blended families | /r/MensRights | 23/06/26 10:46 PM |
| 17 | Never become a "Step Father"My mother and stepfather have been married for 16 years. He's an amazing man who I love and respect a lot, family doesn't always mean blood relation. This is a really gross perspective on blended families, many step fathers are some of the most selfless, loving men out there | /r/MensRights | 23/06/26 09:51 PM |
| 1 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessI did say it wasn't relevant to my comment... At the very start, I said that you're talking about a completely different woman to the one I mentioned... | /r/MensRights | 22/06/26 09:12 AM |
| -1 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessAnd I said name one university that admires Valerie Solanas, you replied to that comment with AI slop about a completely different woman... It's not moving a goalpost when I ask a direct question relating to one specific person, you replied talking about a completely different person and I pointed that out. That's you lacking basic reading comprehension skills, my friend. You copied and pasted a small paragraph from wikipedia, not exactly research... The paragraph just talks about how a professo… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 09:58 PM |
| 0 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessI asked about Valerie Solanas, genius. Also, maybe try and use your own brain instead of regurgitating AI slop. Andrea Dworkin was a feminist author, she never did anything violent but rather focused her attention on the analysis of pornography. You may disagree with her but there's nothing wrong with others admiring her work, thats the joy of living in a free country, people are allowed to think differently to you. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 09:11 AM |
| 0 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessMany people also showed up to the trials of male murders and supported them, the public reaction has always been divisive regarding abhorrent cases. There has always been a subset of the population that supports a criminal, no matter how heinous their crimes are. You're absolutely wrong, the circumstances of the crimes also elicited sympathy i.e the Menendez brothers background. Other killers that aren't objectively attractive were/ are also romanticised by many i.e John Wayne Gacy. I'm not goin… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 10:36 PM |
| 1 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessI'm not going to deny that women are often infantilised in the court system which can and regularly does result in a lesser sentence. But, the way in which criminals are taught at university level is exactly how I described it. I'd also argue that notorious male killers are often seen as misunderstood, attractive and intriguing by the public. Just look at Ryan Murphys anthology series 'Monster', Dahmer was one of the most watched series ever on Netflix, he was played by a conventionally attracti… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 10:03 PM |
| 1 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessShe isn't portrayed in that way at all. Her childhood is often studied, not to portray her actions as understandable, but to explore explanations for her behaviour. In psychology classes, all criminals are taught in this way, this isn't unique to her. We delve into the background of criminals to provide an explanation for their crimes, this doesn't mean we are saying their crimes are 'understandable' or excusable. Look at Ted Bundy, for example. His background has been studied in depth and is ta… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 09:43 PM |
| 1 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessTeaching about her doesn't equate to admiration. I did a forensic psychology course during my undergraduate degree and utilised the Yorkshire Ripper case (Peter Sutcliffe) to study a geographical profiling model, that wasn't admiration... Solanas is a complex historical individual who will obviously be taught to students and should be, we shouldn't ignore figures that we don't like... | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 08:46 PM |
| -5 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death Goddessok, name the university where students openly admire Solanas and said university shares their admiration. It's weird that I'm getting downvoted for simply asking for the university that admires this woman, if it's true then it shouldn't be difficult to name the place | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:06 PM |
| -10 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessPlease name a university that openly admires Valerie Solanas | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 02:35 PM |
| -18 | Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death GoddessPeople are interested in true crime, that’s it. There are also hundreds of true crime films/ series on Netflix including men who murdered women. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 12:40 PM |
| -2 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'He continuously asked her for 12 years, she had a mental health crisis where he became her full time carer and still continued to ask and made her feel guilty for their life not turning out as they planned. "I know that can sound absolutely barmy to someone just hearing the story, but remember, this isn't overnight. Imagine being with someone for 12 years and them just convincing you of something." "Then, in 2021, after Ruth suffered a mental health crisis, he became her named carer. She was mad… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 11:04 AM |
| -4 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'It's a BBC article, it obviously isn't going to go into detail about this woman's mental health diagnosis, that would be against GDPR... Stating that she had a mental health crisis and her husband became her full time carer isn't vague, it demonstrates just how severe her mental health issues were, at the time. I feel like you don't understand what sexual coercion is... Pressuring someone and making them feel guilty until they eventually say yes to sexual relations is sexual coercion and it is i… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 10:00 PM |
| 4 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'And you're assuming she's not speaking in good faith. Read the article again, she knew that she would be having sex with other men but she assumed that they would be going together and meeting other couples to have sex with said men. That changes the entire dynamic, there is a very clear difference between two couples meeting and having sex compared to one woman meeting men alone. The fact she arranged some meetings with other men doesn't mean anything, she mentioned that it felt easier and safe… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 08:25 PM |
| 0 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'I cannot tell you anything about the personal life of the woman in the article, what I can tell you is that it has nothing to do with how she was sexually coerced by her husband. Presumably, you wouldn't believe male victims and you would want the case to be thrown out of court. You don't believe female victims of sexual coercion so why would you believe male victims? I advocate for both male and female victims of sexual violence and I hope that male victims also receive justice in a court of la… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 06:08 PM |
| -2 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'She's not vague about how her husband coerced her, she mentioned that he had asked repeatedly for 12 years, she suffered a mental health crisis, and he became her carer. She said she was made to feel guilty that their life hadn't turned out how they originally planned and she eventually gave in and agreed to do this. That is the definition of coercion, verbal pressure and guilt. She also didn't know what she was agreeing to, she expected that they would be meeting other couples together, she rep… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 05:34 PM |
| 0 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'Everyone isn't legally considered vulnerable, a vulnerable adult is defined under the Protection of Vulnerable Adults Regulations 2002 within The Police Act 1997. What constitutes a vulnerable adult includes an array of different things i.e disabilities, a physical or mental illness, a reduction in mental capacity... etc. Our laws aren't black and white, they include such nuances so we can understand a situation and apply the appropriate law to it. I don't know what you're arguing against here, … | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 05:22 PM |
| -6 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'So you don't believe that a vulnerable person can be taken advantage of because 'they aren't helpless'? What about elderly people who are vulnerable to scams? Does that not count as stealing since the elderly individual willingly sent money to the scammer? They aren't helpless so... Our laws aren't black and white, we account for the nuances in each situation which is why coercion is a form of sexual assault, regardless of the victims consent. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 03:36 PM |
| -2 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'Anyone can be coerced into sexual relations, including men. The woman in the article was absolutely vulnerable and did need assistance which is why her husband was her legal carer... | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 03:14 PM |
| -19 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'You left out a lot of the story in your summary. She suffered a mental health crisis where her husband became her carer, she was obviously in a vulnerable state and after saying she didn't want to do this for 12 years, she eventually agreed out of guilt and vulnerability. She told him multiple times throughout this that she didn't want to do this anymore, she told her husband that she was scared and this was traumatic for her yet he ignored her and continued to arrange meetings with other men. S… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 01:29 PM |
| 2 | I don’t ever want to date a woman unless there is sex involved.He’s clearly dehumanised women to quite a scary degree. I really hope no woman is dating him, for their own safety | /r/MensRights | 15/06/26 08:54 PM |
| 2 | I don’t ever want to date a woman unless there is sex involved.Seems like he objectifies women to such an extent that he can’t imagine having a connection with a woman that doesn’t involve sex | /r/MensRights | 15/06/26 08:14 PM |
| 3 | I don’t ever want to date a woman unless there is sex involved.If the only thing you’re getting from a partner is sex, leave the relationship. A relationship should be mutually fulfilling in a multitude of ways, your partner should be your best friend, someone you genuinely love to spend time with outside of sex | /r/MensRights | 15/06/26 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Relationships with Women & The Body Count IssueI never said you believed this, I said that what you're saying is genuinely nonsense, which it is. Question, do you have any experience in the LGBTQ+ community? Do you identify as LGBTQ+? Do you spend time in real life in LGBTQ+ spaces? Pointing to a subreddit (one that you didn't even name), is not evidence of gay men having a particular stance on body count. Using dating apps and participating in hook up culture while holding the belief that a high body count is a negative thing in a partner i… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 02:32 PM |
| 1 | Relationships with Women & The Body Count IssueWhat you're saying is genuinely nonsense... Many lesbian women are perfectly fine with dating bisexual women who have been with men. The lesbians that are specifically seeking other lesbians do so based on seeking a shared lived experience, not because they see a woman as less than for dating men. It is vastly different growing up as homosexual compared to bisexual, wanting a partner that understands your experiences is valid. Gay men notoriously do not care about body count, do you really think… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 01:12 PM |
| 0 | Why are the Are We Dating The Same Guy Facebook groups still going strong years later? Paola Sanchez and Blake Milbrand need to face lawsuits for keeping these groups going.I agree with you, absolutely. However, describing it as specifically a male issue, as OP did, is blatant misinformation and further fuels online gender wars 🤷 Awareness about the harm said groups cause is important but masquerading said harm as only women targeting men is equally as harmful | /r/MensRights | 17/05/26 03:53 PM |
| -3 | Why are the Are We Dating The Same Guy Facebook groups still going strong years later? Paola Sanchez and Blake Milbrand need to face lawsuits for keeping these groups going.I'm confused, the same thing exists in reverse? 'Are we dating the same girl" Facebook groups with tens of thousands of members per group Are you against these groups in general or specifically the groups created by and for women? If so, why? And why are you calling it an 'anti male agenda' when the reverse exists for and by men? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeComedy famously targets all demographics... If you genuinely believe that all comedians jokes actually represent their beliefs of specific causes and people then 🤷 | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 03:05 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeYes, it's supposed to be funny. Not a legitimate representation of a movements beliefs... Ironic that you think I'm playing dumb though when you haven't had one intelligent point yet | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:47 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeAll your examples either didn't include anything about Sabrina Carpenter OR they were from a satirical website... I asked you to provide evidence of your claims and you weren't able to 🤷 To answer your question though, humour is very subjective. Do I personally find jokes about murdering men or women funny? No, but would I use a comedy website to provide legitimate evidence for a movement? Also no. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:30 PM |
| -1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeI'm starting to realise that 💀 | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:23 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeYou're not comfortable associating yourself with a comedic, satirical website that literally has comedy tours? That's fine but maybe don't associate comedians with a legitimate movement lol | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:22 PM |
| 0 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeYou do realise that website is 'hyper exaggerated mean girl satire' and also referred to as 'comedic feminism'... It was actually created as a satirical answer to 'bro culture'... | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:14 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeThere's nothing about Sabrina Carpenter on that list... | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:10 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeI can't find that 'feminist opinion' on any feminist blogs or websites... Can you send any evidence? Unless you're just referring to what you have seen from anonymous accounts on reddit.. That isn't evidence to a feminist opinion. What subsection of feminism are you referring to? Obviously, many branches of feminism have different beliefs and opinions so... | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 01:57 PM |
| -4 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeI agree with you that they're sexist but it absolutely is a stretch to assume they support an ideology based on an assumption of said ideology | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 01:35 PM |
| 2 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeOr was that celebrated by random anonymous people online that you assumed were feminists? Just like OP assumed these anonymous people are feminists | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 01:33 PM |
| 1 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeSabrina Carpenter has never identified as a feminist? Many feminists actually denounce Sabrina Carpenter... | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 01:29 PM |
| -9 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeSo, it's a complete guess based on your assumptions of feminists? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 01:10 PM |
| -10 | Feminists celebrating the brutal murder of an innocent husband by his wifeObviously, it’s awful to celebrate someone’s murder but none of these people identified as feminist? Many of them are under unidentifiable usernames and random profile pics, we don’t even know if they’re women or men… I don’t understand why you have decided they’re feminists despite zero evidence | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 12:36 PM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceYou’re right, I didn’t approach it as a debate, I said multiple times that my position isn’t concrete - that my whole premise was just based on potential feelings, whether rational or irrational. I continuously used words such as may, potentially, could etc. and I also told you that whether you believe it’s rational or irrational, that’s fine… you approached me to debate and continuously attempted to push me into concrete claims I.e that larger men are more dangerous (a claim that I never stated… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/26 09:37 AM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceI'm completely over the 'debate' now, even though it can't really be called that... More like a typical Reddit argument... So I wont be discussing the point anymore Anyway, I will say that I find it ironic how you're saying I resorted to 'petty insults', despite the fact that I never actually insulted you... Yet you stated my 'misrepresentation of qualitative data' is moronic lol (I absolutely did not misrepresent qualitative data, I am literally finalising my PhD application in qualitative rese… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/26 09:00 AM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceIt is extremely clear what I meant, you can be pedantic as much as you like but through reading the thread, it is obvious that I have been explicitly clear. People may fear an unknown man approaching them due to fearing potentially awkward situations i.e having to reject said man., they may fear potentially unwanted attention i.e a man talking to them continuously despite making it apparent they aren't interested., they may fear being harassed/ followed etc. You clearly don't know what statistic… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/26 08:02 AM |
| 1 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceMany men do feel intimidated by larger men... It has been documented that many male spaces have an unspoken male hierarchy in which many men compete with each other and be intimidated/ jealous of men who appear 'more masculine' I read a study quite recently actually that spoke about how in many online male social groups, men will brag about their sexual accomplishments, working out, money etc., intimidating younger men while also encouraging them to copy them so they can move up in the hierarchy… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 09:10 PM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceI feel like you're not even reading what I'm saying... I absolutely said the feelings could be due to violence through quoting violence statistics, why else did you think I was quoting the stats? The stats are really quite high, just under half of men face violence by a male perpetrator and a quarter of women face SA by a male perp... A statistical improbability is between 0-1 so it isn't statistically improbable and it may be unquantifiable but lived experiences and feelings fall under qualitat… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 08:59 PM |
| -1 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceDamn, essay and a half I obviously did acknowledge said feelings could be due to fearing violence which is why I quoted violence statistics, demonstrating why it also isn't irrational to be fearful of violence from unknown men... It doesn't matter about the statistical likelihood of violence actually occurring since my entire premise was built upon how someone may feel, whether said feelings are rational or irrational. There was also never an assumption that larger men = automatically dangerous,… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 05:38 PM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceI never said 'considering violence is disingenuous'... I said that not acknowledging how being approached by an unknown person who is larger/ stronger than you may be fear invoking is disingenuous... I didn't originally mention violence, my stance was based upon how someone may feel in a potentially uncomfortable situation. You mentioned violence so I provided statistics demonstrating why it also wouldn't be irrational to be fearful of violence | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 05:13 PM |
| -1 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceWho ever said scurrying away from everything male? I have only ever mentioned potentially feeling intimidated and/ or fearful of unknown strangers approaching you... 8% is still almost 1/10 which is a significant amount of the male population. It seems like you just want to argue for the sake of arguing since you're hallucinating scenarios I never even alluded to | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 05:04 PM |
| 1 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceLet's not deny reality. Almost 40% of men have faced violence by a male perpetrator, 26% have faced violence from unknown men It isn't irrational to be wary of unknown men | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 04:42 PM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceI'm sorry, are we really denying reality here? We all want to live in a world where violence doesn't exist but we don't. Obviously, people may be fearful of unknown individuals approaching them...especially when said individual is larger and stronger than them It isn't irrational for a woman to be wary of unknown men when 1/4 women have been sexually assaulted. It isn't irrational for men to be fearful of unknown men when almost 40% of men have faced violence at the hands of a male perpetrator, … | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 04:41 PM |
| 6 | Why do men remarry/re-cohabitate?Love? | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 12:23 PM |
| -2 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceIt's not an assumption to say that men are, on average, larger and stronger than women; it's a biological fact. It is also true that an unknown man poses a larger threat to a woman than an unknown woman poses to a man I never mentioned violence, I was talking about feeling intimidated and/ or fearful. You're being quite disingenuous by not acknowledging how being approached by a larger, stronger individual may be fear invoking | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 11:53 AM |
| 0 | “Guys don’t like it when random dudes try to hit them up” is a false equivalenceRandom men are inherently more threatening than random women because they're larger and stronger, on average. If a random woman approached a man, it's unlikely that he will feel intimidated and/ or fearful I think women who say that are more so trying to put you in their shoes rather than trying to make a completely accurate comparison between men and women. We can all probably agree that it would be intimidating to be approached by many random men as a woman in public | /r/MensRights | 12/05/26 09:52 AM |
| 2 | Having hobbies is essential for having individualality and being interstingI agree that societal expectations absolutely play a role in women choosing to wear make up but that doesn't make it a necessity - a necessity is something you need to live Make up is more comparable to fashionable clothing, there is a significant amount of advertisement for the next new thing and you may face social repercussions for not keeping up with said trends i.e the switch in popularity from skinny jeans to baggy. That doesn't make fashionable clothing a necessity though 🤷 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/04/26 08:58 AM |
| 4 | Having hobbies is essential for having individualality and being interstingMake up definitely isn’t a necessity or comparable to cooking, it is something that many women are passionate about, they enjoy it and spend hours perfecting this skill Make up is definitely considered an artistic hobby | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/26 09:00 PM |
| 4 | Having hobbies is essential for having individualality and being interstingDid the women you matched with show up to the date in a full face of make up? That is a hobby and an art form that takes many, many hours to perfect I think your definition of a hobby is quite narrow, a hobby isn’t something that you need to necessarily become good at - collecting things is a hobby | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/26 08:47 PM |
| 1 | A woman who’s with an obviously terrible man is also a terrible person.It isn't classist to say that crime rates are higher in deprived areas, that is a fact Your title highlights 'obviously terrible men', women who are being abused know their partner is obviously terrible yet they still return to said partner, on average, 7 times until finally leaving. What I said relates to that since such people tend to love bomb their partners until the relationship is difficult to leave i.e kids and/ or marriage You obviously aren't here to debate considering your tendency to … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/26 08:36 PM |
| 0 | A woman who’s with an obviously terrible man is also a terrible person.I think this is much more nuanced than you're making out, what's your definition of morality? Are you referring to societal standards that uphold certain behaviours as good and others as bad and if so, which society? Obviously, moral behaviour differs from country to country, from continent to continent... Are you referring to strictly criminal behaviour? If so, socioeconomic factors play a huge role. If a woman grows up in poverty, she is more likely to grow up around criminal behaviour and tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/26 12:26 PM |
| 6 | Women can’t sit here and say that only men benefit in a marriage and still continue to marry them.Surprise, women aren't a monolith. One woman can say and believe something that completely contradicts the thoughts and statements of another woman - shocking, I know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/04/26 01:34 PM |
| 3 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryYour question is much too broad and void of context, especially since your definition of 'unflattering' seems to be rude and/ or discriminatory statements regarding a particular group If what you're implying falls into any of the bullet points listed, then yes, if it doesn't then no. It's quite simple. I'm sure you can use your brain to figure this one out Anyway, I'm going to stop responding to you here because I've made my point and you are continuing to move the goalpost - have a nice rest of… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 03:51 PM |
| 3 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryThe Equality Act protects individuals from discrimination, including: "Discrimination can come in one of the following forms: direct discrimination - treating someone with a protected characteristic less favourably than others indirect discrimination - putting rules or arrangements in place that apply to everyone, but that put someone with a protected characteristic at an unfair disadvantage harassment - unwanted behaviour linked to a protected characteristic that violates someone’s dignity or c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 03:40 PM |
| 2 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryYes, I'm not sure where you're from but in the UK it is illegal to discriminate against anyone in relation to their sex The Equality Act (2010) specifically references male and females and protects both groups from direct discrimination i.e treating someone less favourably or unfairly due to their sex | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 03:35 PM |
| 4 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryI suppose everyone just loves a more interesting story, especially regarding science which is typically seen as quite boring lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 03:22 PM |
| 5 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryYes, if a negative statement was made about men that was in front of men or on a public forum, the person would face social repercussions from men Just like many women who posted about hating all men faced social repercussions i.e many faced insults, ridicule and were publicly shamed by many men and male orientated podcasts | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 03:20 PM |
| 7 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryWhen you generalise an entire group of people, regardless of who, you will face social repercussions to a certain extent - whether its as small as someone just not wanting to engage with you due to your statements. People are absolutely allowed to form an opinion of someone based on their rhetoric I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, it's taboo to say anything that generalises and is rude to an entire subset of the population. The vast majority of people in polite society will have a n… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 02:56 PM |
| 2 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryThat's interesting, I will definitely look into it more - there seems to be quite a bit of contradicting evidence/ opinions regarding her after a quick google. Thanks for the info (: | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 02:42 PM |
| 8 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryThe context in which something is being said is important, would anyone care if someone stated that men invented the vast majority of things as a matter of fact? No, thats routinely stated because its a fact The issue is when good things are said about a particular group with the intention of demeaning another group i.e discussing what men have done in comparison to women with the intention of portraying women as lesser than. An example would be in the Manosphere documentary by Louie Theroux, Ju… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 02:30 PM |
| 13 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the Contraryhttps://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/hedy-lamarr - Hedy Lamarr developed the technology that formed the foundation of WiFi | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 02:12 PM |
| 29 | There is a Taboo Against Making Statements Which Are Unflattering to Women as a Group; This Discussion Board is Not Evidence to the ContraryYou're allowed to say whatever you like but this doesn't free you from other people interjecting and providing their opinion and/ or context to your original statement. If you generalise an entire group and call them 'cowardly', members of said group will rightfully call out such a generalisation and present their opinion i.e many women go through child birth, maternal mortality is incredibly high and is one of the leading causes of death of women - that doesn't exactly scream cowardly. You can … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/04/26 12:05 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter