TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WebZen Archive

View 10 posts and 158 comments by WebZen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/personals/
/r/seduction02/02/11 07:20 PM
2

So what's better: nerdy/geeky stuff or what? I'd expect geeky to do well cause it implies intelligence and higher pay.
/r/seduction22/12/10 01:24 AM
1

If I know kids, the mom was in the middle. 4 year olds do that, especially after divorce. Don't make a big deal out of it.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 01:41 AM
3

Annulment, yes. But also take inventory of yourself to answer: how/why did you get yourself into this? Figure it out so it doesn't happen again.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 12:13 PM
2

and one state that examined the problem found as many as 30 percent of those paying child support were, indeed, not the biological fathers of the children being supported. this is not fta, it is from a google search on "percent paternity fraud"
/r/MensRights17/09/10 12:57 AM
5

If I lived in the UK I'd be one of them.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:56 AM
1

Were her suicide attempts at all competent? If so, she'll off herself soon enough. Enjoy your freedom.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 01:29 AM
1

damn, you cynical
/r/MensRights23/07/10 12:24 AM
1

This is way too rare an event. Probably happened because the accusation was extreme and very upsetting to the community.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:44 PM
5

She's not a "victim" if she wasn't raped. That's the whole idea behind false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:58 AM
4

You need to print it out and spill all over it. Like I did.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:54 PM
2

Yeah, I think that is the number they say is "acceptable."
/r/MensRights10/06/10 06:37 AM
2

Been there already. They either ignore it or claim it is biased and inaccurate.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 12:32 PM
32

So true. How ironic.
/r/MensRights01/06/10 11:17 AM
4

exactly, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 09:35 PM
10

“If women got special rights to anonymity, it would reinforce the misconception that lots of women who report rape are lying.” FTFY
/r/MensRights27/05/10 11:38 AM
3

I am not friends with any ex's. But I still love every one of them, including the one who recently approached me to be friends and I told her to fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 11:07 PM
0

You can't argue with the men's right's advocates about this. They see sexism and that's end of story. Just do what's right for your kids and leave their kids to fend for themselves.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 01:52 AM
0

So, so serious. Lighten up, dude. btw, I call my asshole "ristin"
/r/MensRights16/04/10 02:54 AM
-1

I'm fine with that. I detest people who lie to get sex. (And withholding critical information, like your GENDER STATUS, is a "lie by omission.") I don't care who it is, what the lie is, or their gender, they deserve what they get. I think it borders on rape, you are free to disagree but you will not change my mind about it. There was recently a thread about men who lie to get sex. My position was that it is rape, or damn close to it.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 10:50 PM
2

I'll never understand why cops do that shit.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 12:56 PM
-6

Whatever. This is exactly why I say that trannys are as fucked up as people get. Edit: you're correct. I don't care what people do as long as it doesn't involve me. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 08:06 PM
-3

I don't hate you. I just don't want to FUCK you. If you TRICK me into fucking you, it is a sexual assault. Why is that so hard for you to understand? You want to be treated as equals, but when it comes to disclosure of critical information, you want to be special. You can have all the privacy you want, but when you set out to FUCK me, you have an obligation to disclose any and all critical information to me so I can make an informed decision. You don't get to decide what information I consider c…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 05:44 PM
-3

I seriously doubt you've trained more than I have. What I'd like to know from you is this: why do you feel it's ok to withhold that information? If I had a raging outbreak of herpes, and I didn't tell you, would that be your problem? Hey, if you wrongly assume I'm not diseased, that's your problem, right? After all, it is sensitive personal info.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 05:24 PM
-5

Withholding critical information is a form of lying that can be worse than actual lies because it is so insidious. It is manipulation. "Do this or I'll beat you up" is bad not because it is physical but because it is manipulation. Same difference, just one uses lies to get what you want, the other uses physical force. IMO, they are both rape, or at least very close to rape. Rape's close relative. I take it you are just fine and dandy with the idea of a tranny withholding that information. That's…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 04:11 PM
-3

Didn't think you'd like that. If I'm told I can say no. You need to be fully informed to say no. The context here is when the information is withheld. As I said, that is a form of sexual assault bordering on rape. I'm not one to call the cops in such a situation.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 03:14 PM
1

Vonnegut said we can't have children without them.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 10:37 AM
0

I'd rather have permissive tranny parents than cig repressive parents any day.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 10:36 AM
2

MR and feminists should be on the same side, but we're not on some issues. For good reasons, even though it's wrong. So I agree, but just because. It has nothing to do with trans.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 10:34 AM
-3

A trans woman could stop taking estrogen for a year, and the odds are extremely good that no one would notice. I agree and it's why prisons have no obligation to provide HRT.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 10:00 AM
3

Interesting fact, but I don't think there is any way to know if the changes in the brain are causing the behavior/feelings, or if the behavior/feelings are causing the changes in the brain. Everything we do changes our brain. Our early experiences, even pre-natal, strongly imprint on our brains. We don't know what's what.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 09:58 AM
-6

I know a guy who "dated" transexuals and cross dressers. I've met several of his lovers. Had fun flirting with some of them and giving them the "larry david" stare, but I really wasn't at all interested and I'm pretty sure they knew it. I don't care what other people do. People do odd things sometimes, I do odd things sometimes, it's not more of an issue with that than with any other odd thing people might do. I'd hire one without any concern in most cases. Only if they were flaming and had to i…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 09:51 AM
7

there are no consequences for false accusers, yet when women read that men are secretly taping their sexual activities to protect themselves from exactly that, they are outraged. Funny how there's no outrage at the false allegations.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 01:34 AM
6

yes, I have learned this also.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 01:32 AM
1

That's a good point, and I'll agree. But does it matter much if you rape someone or sexually assault them? Both are bad, right? (Yes, one is worse.) The problem I see is the douchebags who think it's fine to lie their way into a girl's pants, but they get all pissed off if she lies to them about being on the pill, or not have herpes, etc. It's all sexual assault, and any such lie should be condemned by all.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 02:22 PM
-4

Yes, there are a lot of rapists out there. If she would not have had sex with you if she knew the truth, and you lie, then it is rape. How would YOU feel about it if the lie was "I'm on the pill"? Same thing. And yes, a woman can rape a man that way, and many do.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 01:50 AM
6

That is a form of sexual assault, not sure if it's legally rape though.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 01:02 AM
-5

If you lie to get sex then it's rape. There can be exceptions, but it's rare. (The only exception I can think of is if the woman somehow manipulates the man into lying. In that case the lie is still wrong, but her behavior must also be considered and calling it rape is way harsh.)
/r/MensRights07/04/10 12:58 AM
2

Yes, that's too. If not the fighters attacking you, the cops will when they arrive.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 11:48 AM
13

I would not interfere, either, because he was bigger and stronger than she was, so I'd figure he could handle her if he had to. If I did anything, it would be to tell him to "man up and don't take that shit from her, walk away and never see her again." The fucked up thing is that if he did hit her in self defense, he'd be going to jail. That's the fucked up part.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 12:12 AM
4

Her behavior is classic "controlling abuser." Google it, send the info to him somehow, then you gotta let go and let him do his thing, even if it is a mistake. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=signs+of+a+controlling+abuser&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off
/r/MensRights29/03/10 11:53 PM
3

I agree with most of that article, but not that part.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 09:14 PM
8

You are right, but I am still not convinced. A better solution to the problems are to change the way divorces are handled rather than destroy the idea of marriage.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 01:15 AM
9

I think a good marriage conveys many benefits, but the key is "good." Financial security, emotional security, a stable home for your children are primary benefits. Alas, it doesn't always work out that way, and when it doesn't there is pain for all parties.
/r/MensRights26/03/10 07:27 PM
4

So true, especially about how women like to "trade up" their mates.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 12:23 PM
1

I'm glad you don't live near me.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 01:43 PM
10

You'd still be buying rings, but 3 month's salary would buy you a 10 ton diamond ring. Now that's gonna get you a blow job!
/r/MensRights19/03/10 10:06 AM
42

Diamond rings are such bullshit. The market is rigged, they are worthless.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 09:59 AM
1

I'd rather bet my freedom on that than on the ethical honesty of the woman I bedded after knowing her for an entire 3 whole dates. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:23 PM
1

Not in "single party consent" states.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:14 PM
1

Limit your false accusation evidence to audio, should be fine.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 01:13 AM
10

I'll see your blaming a victim and raise you: I have heard of a rape victim being blamed for being the rapist.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 02:51 AM
2

equally bullshit, you mean.
/r/MensRights23/02/10 02:03 AM
3

taking any child to the Catholic Church should be illegal.
/r/MensRights23/02/10 02:02 AM
3

well we know which websites she goes to.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 02:26 AM
2

That's a good point.
/r/MensRights05/02/10 04:27 AM
1

Each camp advocates for their own issues, and their own viewpoint on any issue. That's human nature. It's sad when opportunities to work together are wasted on dogma like "can't prosecute false accusations because of the effect it would have on rape prosecutions." I think both sides can have what they want if rape convictions carried very heavy sentences and false accusations are made felonies and are vigorously prosecuted. Add to that a public education campaign to teach women to report rape. W…
/r/MensRights05/02/10 12:24 AM
2

I'm sure it's just the radicals. The mainstream feminists are all about equal pay, equal opportunity, and putting false accusers in prison for multi-year sentences.
/r/MensRights03/02/10 02:36 AM
-1

Why are women bad at math? Because men keep telling them that <---------------------------------this---------------------------------> is 10"
/r/MensRights27/01/10 05:23 AM
0

The intent to offend is offensive.
/r/MensRights24/01/10 03:33 PM
2

You may not be able to close the account, but you can take your name off it. And you should.
/r/MensRights28/12/09 09:20 AM
4

A lawyer told me once "go to the racetrack and get a bunch of betting stubs out of their trash. Use them to claim that you lost it all." Seriously though, I expect this could backfire. Judges don't like it when people are hiding assets. The tendency is for the judge to give it all to the other person.
/r/MensRights28/12/09 09:18 AM
3

She bribed you for sex? Details, please.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 01:28 PM
8

They really need to add a line between "reported" and "arrested" that says "unfounded accusation." This really should be a flow chart.
/r/MensRights20/12/09 02:17 AM
5

I don't know that that's true, but probably most rapists do walk, for one reason or another. Most, probably, don't even get charged.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 10:20 PM
1

I know you meant sarcasm, but you wrote truth. It doesn't mean that we need to correct every wrong. We probably never could do that. But the big ones need to be addressed.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 01:25 PM
8

I've been with that woman a few times. Both times the physical abuse ended when I told them that next time I'd hit them back. Both times the abuse just changed form rather than ended. Older and wiser now, I will not give an abusive person a second chance.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 11:46 AM
7

The friend called the police, not her. That's one good reason why no charges.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 05:38 PM
9

That's like saying a DUI is for driving, not for being drunk. The false statement created the perversion.
/r/MensRights31/10/09 01:05 PM
-1

You're often dealing with women who have been traumatized by rape. People traumatized by anything lash out. This is not different.
/r/MensRights30/10/09 10:40 PM
6

I've dated enough lawyers to know that you never want to divorce one.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 01:27 AM
0

It's not total bullshit, but there is a time and a place for that.
/r/MensRights09/09/09 12:25 PM
8

Of course there are. That's like saying there are no man-hating feminists.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 02:33 AM
5

what's WW?
/r/MensRights21/08/09 03:41 PM
18

File for divorce first. That way any allegations she makes will be obvious retaliation. It weakens her allegation. Of course, since she already made the allegations it might not help that much.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:11 AM
2

http://falserapearchives.blogspot.com/2009/06/archives-of-sexual-behavior-feb-1994.html
/r/MensRights14/08/09 04:53 PM
3

A lot of prosecutors only care about racking up felony convictions. Sometimes they don't even care if perjury is used, as long as they get their conviction. Other prosecutors don't work that way. It all depends on the prosecutor. If the prosecutor is dirty, the cops will be dirty.
/r/MensRights13/08/09 06:38 PM
3

There will always be false accusers. Yes, but 41% false accusations is way too high, and much higher than the false accusation rate for other crimes. Setting appropriate punishment for false accusations would reduce the risk in the future.
/r/MensRights13/08/09 06:36 PM
3

I used to agree with that, but now I think it's more important to set an example. Not because it will help the poor falsely accused bastards who rot in prison today, but because it will prevent future occurrences of this crime.
/r/MensRights13/08/09 06:29 PM
0

I think you're right. Was it the wra's that said stuff like that? I have doubts.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 02:21 PM
0

I kinda remember that thread, but I don't think it says what you say it says. I recall it saying something like "the person in the booth should have done something, regardless of their gender."
/r/MensRights12/08/09 12:26 PM
2

Yeah, I have lived that book.
/r/MensRights11/08/09 05:45 PM
2

This is a British publication. Americans see a poorly reported outrage. British men see porno for submissive men who want to be humiliated.
/r/MensRights09/08/09 01:58 AM
5

That is an odd dynamic. I know a single guy who owns a wedding ring. He wears it when he goes out to bars, says it gets him laid way easier when women think he's married. I never understood that, but seems true, at least while watching him in action. edit: his explanation for it was that a wedding ring is "proof of ability to commit" and that's what attracts the women. Single men have no such proof. To the contrary, the older they are, the less likely they are to commit. (Commit = marriage, I th…
/r/MensRights19/07/09 12:17 PM
-2

A bit biased, no?
/r/MensRights14/07/09 02:55 AM
1

that list makes me limp.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 11:52 AM
2

I'm not being sarcastic. 5% would be expected. 41% means there is a problem that needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 02:01 PM
5

41% is a huge number.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 11:33 AM
2

I wonder why rape victims often need to be coddled like this. People who survived attempted murder are routinely called to testify, it's not that big a deal. Anyway, it's because women don't buck up and do what they need to do that we have the anonymous accuser policy and similar policies that feed the false rape accusation problem.
/r/MensRights16/06/09 09:17 PM
7

Serious crimes of all types are underreported. People just don't want to get involved. Rape isn't special that way. As for the idea that frat parties are dangerous, I'd have to agree that frat parties are "high risk behavior" and I'd warn my daughter along those lines. I wouldn't tell her not to go, I'd warn her not to accept a drink from anyone, we'd discuss ways to guard her drink from being spiked and to limit alcohol consumption, etc. I've escorted strange women though dark parking garages a…
/r/MensRights14/06/09 04:11 PM
2

the best she could do? Of course not Many people do consider him to be a "good catch," precisely because of the money.
/r/MensRights07/06/09 12:44 AM
2

he's acting out of consent, or at least he thinks he is Well, that's my point. We don't know either way.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 08:52 AM
3

I do get the "he's a minor therefore it is rape" aspect. I'm just saying that maybe he wasn't traumatized, and therefore he is acting out of actual consent today.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 07:09 AM
-2

I'm not convinced that he is actually acting out of free will. There is a reason that most female porn stars are survivors of childhood sexual abuse. The same thing could be happening here. That said, I can also see that maybe he had really hot fantasies about her ever since, and now he has a chance to make it real. Could be. I lost my virginity at 13 and I don't feel scarred by it at all. (Wasn't an older woman, but still. 13 year old boys pretty much want it and there is the "can't rape the wi…
/r/MensRights22/05/09 09:58 PM
5

Damn hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/05/09 01:50 PM
3

I think I did cover that ground by saying that accusers should be severely punished IF the man is found innocent at trial AND the woman can be shown to be lying. THAT will be a significant deterrent to bringing frivolous charges while not inhibiting recanting after conviction.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:49 PM
0

Your sarcasm is enticing, but I still believe what I believe. It simply won't work any other way, and I wouldn't want to be the guy rotting in prison because some lying bitch doesn't dare step forward.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 08:03 PM
6

Moreso. It is the flip side of "men are more violent." It is true, men are more violent and women are better manipulators.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 06:09 PM
6

Once a male is arrested, charged, convicted, etc. the punishment needs to become progressively more severe The problem with your idea is that at this point in the process it is extremely unlikely that the woman will be discovered to have lied unless she steps forward and admits it. She is much less likely to do so if she knows she'll spend time in jail for it. The severe punishment needs to be triggered during the trial period, thus discouraging false accusers from making the allegation in the f…
/r/MensRights08/05/09 06:07 PM
14

I don't think a woman should be charged in this situation. He was already convicted, recantation should be encouraged, not discouraged. Charges like this would only prevent other false accusers from stepping forward. However, when a man is found not guilt at a trial, and the accuser can be shown to have been lying, then they should make an example of her with punishments as severe as the accused rapist would have suffered had he been convicted. (Can't have that, though, because it would reduce r…
/r/MensRights08/05/09 02:35 PM
2

I find it stunning that he would stay in that marriage.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 01:25 PM
1

I don't think it's written in any law, but there are some feminist activists who are pushing to make it law. The reason I commented is that the research on alcohol and rape is probably a cross-cultural phenomenon.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 06:08 PM
-1

I thought there was no rape culture?
/r/MensRights04/05/09 02:04 AM
10

Indian BDSM.
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:38 PM
-3

I hate those fucking cowards, too. The quiet downvoters, I mean. At least have the balls to state why you don't like something.
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:37 PM
12

That part that really gets me is that it only absolves the woman. A man remains responsible no matter how much he's had to drink. Gender specific laws shouldn't be written.
/r/MensRights02/05/09 11:23 PM
9

a strong link between false allegations and alcohol consumption Which may explain why some radical feminist activists want to absolve women from responsibility when they drink. That would turn all those alcohol fueled "false allegations" into rape.
/r/MensRights02/05/09 10:47 PM
5

I don't think it's the bank's place to make that decision or that disclosure. In my state it's not community property if it was inherited, gifted, or owned prior to marriage and the bank can't know.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 05:08 PM
2

Yes, that's the key. Internal guidance is faulty for so many people, though.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 02:30 AM
1

ok. I get that. For me it's about my belief that most sex workers are survivors of childhood sexual abuse, and as a result, they are not able to make a free choice because they suffer from a kind of mental illness that is similar to PTSD. For a man to hire them is a form of rape. There are exceptions, and those women should be free to do what they want.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 02:19 AM
-2

Actually, I kinda agree with that and it's a big part of why I'll never hire a prostitute. Although I also see the other side: A woman should be free to decide that she's going to sell her body to get money that she thinks she needs.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 12:20 AM
10

Pay for it by buying dinner, then?
/r/MensRights29/04/09 12:20 AM
3

Soon there will be a problem with men filing "false domestic abuse allegations" and we will finally have equality.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 07:56 AM
2

Porn producers got a pass when an underage model did that. Can't remember her name, but she's famous. Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traci_Lords
/r/MensRights26/04/09 12:19 PM
5

Since when does drunkenness protect you from anything? If you're male, that is.
/r/MensRights26/04/09 12:18 PM
3

That should have been your first post. You're learning.
/r/MensRights25/04/09 08:18 AM
1

misleading title.
/r/MensRights14/04/09 03:06 PM
1

Take a page from the neocons and just leave that stuff out.
/r/MensRights14/04/09 02:55 PM
7

You might still get a passing grade if you slant it as "how false rape accusations hurt women." They do, you know.
/r/MensRights14/04/09 12:15 PM
1

Postnup. That's different, but not by much. Generally a postnup is not honored unless both signers have their own lawyers to advise them. Generally, a properly signed postnup is accepted by the judge. So says my divorce lawyer.
/r/MensRights01/04/09 08:55 PM
10

Bots, maybe. Or, some feminists believe that false rape accusations don't happen, so any story about them is a lie. Our own little Taliban in feminism land.
/r/MensRights25/03/09 09:11 PM
2

He's only suing for $30,000?
/r/MensRights25/03/09 09:09 PM
3

Exactly so. When a male bullies, it's usually physical. When a female bullies, it's usually social (ostracism, gossip, etc).
/r/MensRights23/03/09 12:57 PM
3

I"m with you on the evils of systemic polygamy. But serial monogamy?
/r/MensRights22/03/09 11:51 PM
0

It's only when they involve children that I object.
/r/MensRights22/03/09 11:49 PM
0

Pre-emptive judgement in the headline.
/r/MensRights19/03/09 02:14 PM
-3

I know that woman.
/r/MensRights19/03/09 12:14 AM
1

All those articles need pics.
/r/MensRights09/03/09 01:08 AM
3

My opinion of Alan Dershowitz just went up. Alan Dershowitz, who has given much thought to these issues, was on the same track when he said: “Rape is such a serious crime that deliberately bringing a false accusation of rape should be an equally serious crime and women are not being punished for those crimes. I believe that being falsely accused of rape is as traumatic as being raped.”
/r/MensRights08/03/09 02:30 PM
1

Not sure I follow the logic, but it sounds good so upvoted anyway.
/r/MensRights07/03/09 01:58 AM
3

This is being downmodded. Probably by 'experts.'
/r/MensRights07/03/09 12:16 AM
1

Why are links ending sometimes with WBB or VAM?
/r/MensRights02/03/09 12:52 PM
-1

This is not a gender issue. Everyone is acting on selfish motives. Even people who give unselfishly are actually doing it for how it makes them feel.
/r/MensRights02/03/09 12:31 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that. Abortion rights wouldn't have changed that, however. That woman was a psychopath. I've met a couple, too. Psychopaths suck.
/r/MensRights28/02/09 01:25 AM
-2

I understand there is inequality in "abortion rights," but considering the child, this can't happen. If you don't want a child, put your peepee away.
/r/MensRights27/02/09 11:30 AM
-3

Take your pills before posting.
/r/MensRights25/02/09 02:25 AM
1

Truth, but I can see how it happens. I'd teach my kids the same thing re: who to go to when they're lost.
/r/MensRights24/02/09 10:54 PM
1

My consolation prize.
/r/MensRights22/02/09 10:16 PM
3

It's ok. I go around behind her and vote everything back up.
/r/MensRights21/02/09 02:17 AM
1

Funny, and almost accurate. Penis' are positively nyphotropic, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights04/02/09 01:55 AM
13

One of the comments is interesting: "If the court’s logic is applied fairly to both genders, wives are obligated to support and raise children sired by their husband and born to other women."
/r/MensRights01/02/09 12:43 PM
1

There must be a Freudian slip, cause you're being voted up, but I don't get it. What's the slip?
/r/MensRights01/02/09 12:42 PM
0

Mr. Foreskin. Figures.
/r/MensRights20/01/09 01:11 AM
-2

So... You're saying that trying to burn his penis off isn't a terrible thing? Man, what does it take for you to condemn an act? I'm not defending what she did, regardless of motive. I just have empathy for her state of mind after her husband's infidelity. She was hurt and desperate, she wasn't thinking straight. Now she pays for that for the rest of her life. It could have happened to a lot of us. You are one cold mutherfucker to not see that. It is a pretty fucked up thing that she did, but rem…
/r/MensRights20/01/09 12:25 AM
-6

I feel sorry for her. I know she did a terrible thing, but she didn't intend for him to die, and now her life (and his) is over.
/r/MensRights19/01/09 04:01 AM
4

both men and women are genetically predisposed to ruthlessly exploit each other to achieve the best chances of survival for their genes. Increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasm Could easily be true. Or... increasing partner income increased the number of women’s self-reported FAKE orgasms, and they lied to the researcher because they had nothing to gain and everything to lose if the husband found out. I have no trouble believing that bo…
/r/MensRights18/01/09 08:29 PM
-3

People are aggressive and selfish motherfuckers. If you don't protect your own, someone else will take it. The Islamists are coming - they're already well along in their takeover of Europe - and we're doing squat about it. I can not understand why they move to another country, then expect that country to adopt Sharia law. If you don't like the culture and customs of another country, don't move there!
/r/MensRights16/01/09 03:47 PM
8

I was told that when talking to woman about rape, a man should only assent to women's opinions. "When talking to a man about _________, a woman should only assent to his opinions." Tell me that would fly anywhere.
/r/MensRights15/01/09 02:57 AM
1

Wife? Darling? What are you doing in Ohio?
/r/MensRights09/01/09 02:59 PM
11

I have always said "a false rape allegation is raping with words."
/r/MensRights30/12/08 12:38 PM
4

Men don't make the first move. They are first "invited" to approach by the woman, with body language. Woe to any man who hits on a woman without first getting a "come hither" from her.
/r/MensRights19/12/08 01:46 AM
0

Skank.
/r/MensRights05/12/08 04:06 AM
3

asking your wife to sign a "I didn't beat you this year" doc won't go over well.
/r/MensRights18/11/08 11:34 PM
1

define "lurk."
/r/MensRights18/11/08 02:20 AM
6

"Have you ever heard of a woman arrested for exposing herself?" I remember one sex offence expert asking. "No, because female exhibitionists become topless dancers." And the deviance, which is watching, is attributed to men.
/r/MensRights19/10/08 12:11 AM
1

"It means that one night of sex could mean an 18-year financial sentence"
/r/MensRights12/10/08 01:27 AM
1

I love this quote by Margaret Meade (paraphrased because I don't quite remember it): "I've studied cultures where women cook and clean and men hunt, and cultures where men cook and clean and women hunt, but in all the cultures I've studied it is the work done by the men that is more highly valued by the society."
/r/MensRights30/09/08 09:19 PM
1

submitting the same link to multiple subreddits is the only way to use reddit at the moment. It sucks, creates dupes for lots of people, but that's how reddit does it. If you don't multi-submit a karma whore will do it for you. They should use labels...
/r/MensRights17/09/08 12:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter