TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Weezals Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Weezals on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I really want you to tell me your reasoning for why you think he was not in any way responsible and why this is a sexist issue
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:52 AM
–

' Then he leaves her on the porch and goes to sleep. She has no phone, and she cannot summon help."
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:03 AM
–

In the article, if you read it, she was locked out and unable to get in with no phone to summon help, he knew this but went to sleep, the idea that you think this is somehow not his fault and further, how you think this is a sexist issue is just so fucking stupid
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:47 AM
–

Did you read the article, he berated her for locking herself out then went to sleep without letting her in, with her having no way to summon help or get out, are you fucking serious?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:27 AM
1

Congratulations, you just posted yet another flippin' article which is based on the UK, and the Australian statistics you mention shows that Australia has one of the smaller gaps of gender, i find this pretty hilarious. Also congratulations in linking yet another news article for your so called high quality statistics - You do know why you can't source news articles to prove real valid points right? Also yes, good work in linking an article from canada from a newspaper (That isn't a tabloid you'…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:39 AM
1

Not sure if you read the article you just linked but it outlines biological reasons for the falling behind and gives no creedence to this being a sexism issue or have you forgotten what these comments are about? Also, try posting actual statistics rather than news articles if you want real credibility.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:30 AM
–

Uhh but the two sources you have been given have been utterly against what you're saying, you haven't shown anything that actually proves there is some massive existing at all. If you've ever had to deal with proper sourcing etc... you'd know that a quote saying 'Elite schools are doing more' (From a fucking tabloid website) Is pretty fucking FAR from a good source and does anything but prove your point, but perhaps you are just showing me that you are the living example of the gap of education …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:20 AM
–

Can you give a single good quality source of this happening in Australia?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:08 AM
–

The link you gave basically said this provoked massive grants etc into stopping it and were successful in doing so, in fact, the entire article is about other countries (incl Australia) that have done well to combat the differences, what are you trying to say?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:14 AM
–

Went to school in Australia, not once was there anything that could make anyone think the school system is sexist to men
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:19 AM
–

That is just hilarious that you would think that.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:37 AM
1

Where's a good place to start for you then?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:47 AM
-2

Do you want stats that you'll agree with or high quality statistics? Wikipeida has it at 1 in 20 for females 71 have been raped at some point in their lives, was a pretty respected study however i think i'll be downvoted for saying women get raped more.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:40 AM
-12

Ohh i never double check to see if its OP, my bad!
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:38 AM
-14

I don't know Australian law well This is sex discrimination in hiring under Federal law and the university should be sued Classic reddit statements
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:04 AM
-7

I think its on the same page of affirmative action as IIRC the large part of this position is male at Monash Uni. Obviously some people disagree with it but i won't argue it either way.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:41 PM
7

Did you read your own submission? At the bottom it has "The women only requirement is a lawful special measure under section 12 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and section 7D of the Sex Discrimination Act (Cth)." Bit dishonest of you i think.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:31 PM
-4

You don't even know what country it is, how can you make a blanket claim like that haha
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:15 PM
0

Careful mate, you're blithering.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:45 AM
0

Chill out and get over yourself you're the only one up In arms and no ones bloody trolling
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:34 AM
0

Far out whenever someone disagrees with you do you say its trolling? Dishonesty is not lying. But this is a stupid waste of time arguing
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:10 AM
1

Literally never said you were a liar. Said you being dishonest as you 100% left out some pretty damn important facts. Calling someone an SJW and telling people to leave the sub is just so immature and does nothing to help discussion.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:57 AM
0

Jesus Christ why are you being so aggressive?
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:44 AM
0

Also you were being quite dishonest about his sentence, he got 25 years and will only not get out because of a 'dangerous offender' status wherein its deemed likely he'll recommit, and a large part of sentencing is change of recomitting of the crime. Don't need be dishonest to prove a point mate
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:22 AM
2

Ill admit i'm heavily procrastinating for my Calc exam, but i wasted like 30 minutes going through the guys account history and there are a bunch of contradictions and some full blown lies, it looks like the unwanted sex did happen, but heaps of his comment history doesn't exactly agree with the some of the other points and a bunch of his other comments. Further, he does drop a couple of contradictions in past comments too. Overall, seems like some its legit but i just can't go ahead and believe…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:27 AM
1

That's some bullshit, how long ago was that, interested as the content here has changed over time?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:07 AM
3

These are some real terrible experiences, did you press charges on the teacher?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:34 AM
3

Did you actually get frostbite?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:04 AM
2

This is single worst Reddit post i have ever seen, i'm screenshotting it and looking at it every few months to remind myself never be brainwashed by surrounding myself with only like minded people
/r/MensRights12/10/15 11:18 AM
1

I was making a reference to /r/mensrights becoming more radical and ridiculous honestly
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:22 AM
2

That process happens to any more radical movement that confines their opinions to one place shared only with other like minded people, happens a lot on reddit actually
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:54 AM
0

Rare that someone knowlegeable at something like you actually chimes in and shows just how clueless these people are
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:06 AM
1

Well there is political positions...
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:47 AM
-2

How about pro-men must not be anti-women? This sub is guilty of a wholeee lot of resentment against women in general
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:05 AM
-1

Nice thought out detailed reply, what should i have expected from this sub?
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:26 AM
-4

Do you mean that 55% of the population is women? Because thats just not true at all
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:49 AM
-1

Don't think you understand the role of punishment, countries can refuse entry to anyone, generally its impossible to enter the united states if you have a criminal history for instance, so do you think its 'extra punishment' if someone serves a sentence then is not allowed into the states? Chris Brown beat Rhianna terribly, and Australia has an issue with DV, even if you believe that DV is a thing mostly done by females (which i'd disagree) its still a massive issue and letting into the country …
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:19 AM
0

Jesus
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:03 AM
1

So do you have Australian sources for this? Or was it all fluff?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:26 PM
1

That's not what I'm getting at at all, you implied that because men contribute more tax that they should receive more benefits, I simply said that with that logic you could say rich people should receive more benefits because they contribute more. Also I think you'll find a lot of money from taxpayers isn't directly distributed equally through to all tax payers e.g. Welfare...
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:52 AM
1

Uh huh, well rich people and companies pay the vast majority of tax as well, should they receive the most benefits because of it?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:23 AM
1

And does it even apply in Australia or is it American?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:37 AM
1

Can you give me a source for that first part?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:25 AM
1

I know this sub likes to disregard any source that doesn't have men as the worse off but females are much more likely to be the victims of DV homicide I hope you can see this and it will change your mind but i know that most of this sub cannot be convinced of anything that they don't agree with
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:13 AM
11

Never use the Internet ever again
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:11 AM
-5

You literally just made an assertion, did you see where the money is going? Alot of it is to GPS trackers for convicted DV and CCTV and panic buttons in public areas, which clearly could be used by both male and female, secondly how do you know there isn't a fund for DV against men, have you checked? Yes if it does exist it would clearly receive less funds but domestic violence is objectively more of an issue for women at least in Australia
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:53 AM
-5

So you're saying that any government funded thing that is solely for men is bad as well?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:43 AM
-2

If you want to check your facts it's actually going towards gps trackers on convicted offenders and panic buttons and extra cctv, plus some others
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:05 AM
-5

'paid for by men' jesus christ, are you really able to claim with any seriousness that taxes and civil service are a men's thing?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:01 AM
-4

Do you want it split 50/50?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:15 AM
1

No, i'm saying that if a group of people believes that men historically had it worse off than women and that mensrights is one of the most important issues in modernity then they must have had really bad experiences with women in their life.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 02:20 AM
-3

Only explanation is that this entire sub were beaten by their mothers as kids
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:51 AM
-19

Seems to be pretty prevalent on this sub even if that doesn't include you. Also i don't think you know the difference between sexual assault and rape
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:47 AM
-18

First off, the way he was raped is that he was incredibly drunk, a reason which this sub always claims isn't rape (As long as the rape is a by a man), Secondly, Polanski has escaped to Europe and still resides there, that's why he only films in Europe.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:31 AM
1

Can't tell if you're joking
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:21 AM
1

I wouldn't think of a partner id have a kid with as an investment property or a risk taking venture, they're a fucking human being and if you don't trust them there's no point having a child
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:06 AM
-10

What about Roman Polanski? He did far worse and won a fucking Oscar
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:07 AM
-2

Roman Polanski though?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:57 AM
2

Seems like you've had some shitty experiences in life, i think paternity fraud is way less common than you think..
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:46 AM
2

Some people have trust i guess
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:32 AM
-1

Ever heard of Google?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:15 AM
1

Actually the viewership for women's tennis is sometimes higher than the men's but nice guess work!
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:12 PM
0

Calm down mate, no need to call someone a 'fucking idiot' on an internet forum. The Australian women's team isn't funded like a league akin to the AFL/NFL- Whatever, cricket Australia can easily distribute more funds to them, maybe check those sort of things before you abuse people. We obviously have really different opinions on this so there's no point taking it further, but try relax when online yeah?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:32 PM
0

Never said they should be paid the same amount but they should at least be paid a living amount as until recently most were paid <15k a year and only 100$ per day when touring. If you put that much time into representing your country you should at least get enough compensation to fund that lifestyle.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:01 PM
-1

I've never watched female cricket in my life, i'm saying that to claim what Turnbull said is somehow oppressive to men is just wrong.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:36 AM
-7

How the hell is this sexist to men? The highest paid female cricketers get max 80k a year, while many of the Mens team earn far over a million a year.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:05 AM
-1

What the hell, you just claimed to me that i was objectively wrong for saying there were more males? literally 1 minute before this comment? Are you lying that blatantly?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:33 AM
-6

Only in the past few decades has been socially acceptable for women to have careers at all, women could only vote in most countries in the last century, it was legal to RAPE your wife until only a number of decades ago. That's only recent and after rights movements by women. Secondly, in terms of men to women ratio: Here Here Here Where did you get the idea there were more women?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:23 AM
3

Try to avoid posting things like they are facts that you have no basis for whatsoever, also saying that women are useless besides sex is beyond venting and really just sexist
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:04 AM
5

Is that a fucking joke? Do you seriously think there are 5 times as many women as men? That is the most stupid claim i have ever seen on reddit.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:26 AM
-1

Undeniable that women have historically been much more oppressed in all society There are more men than women in the world - However this number is negligible and i don't get why you said it in the first place I don't get your 'ate the cake' statement, you understand that outside your society which i'm guessing is the states (where i guess its somewhat debatable who has it better off) women have it quite fucking hard in a lot of the world, and if you need proof for that i can give you hundreds o…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:16 AM
3

Yes, there is a massive feminist conspiracy that has invaded spellcheck to make people care about women more...
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:04 AM
-10

1 hour a week, there's 168 hours in a week. That means 0.59% of the time it is women's only, if people on this sub think thats so terrible and should be litigated in court then i don't how you take each other seriously.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:26 AM
1

Famines caused solely by women? Can you give an example?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:08 AM
2

Pretty well known and respected fact that women are disproportionately more affected by natural disasters whether you agree or not
/r/MensRights02/09/15 07:42 AM
0

Can't undestand how you have such a vehement view when in the majority of the world women have it wayy worse than men
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:51 AM
3

Did you just compare the oppression of men to slavery?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:21 AM
1

Jesus christ
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter