| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | Survey on Manosphere & Red pill IdeologyWas gonna fill it out than saw you put father's rights groups as part of some manosphere shit.🤡 | /r/ExRedPill | 29/02/24 08:17 PM |
| -1 | Women like me nowI didn't state anyone for my beliefs other than my own observations so I dont know what you're on about. And I ain't watchin allat🤷♂️ | /r/ExRedPill | 28/02/24 11:07 PM |
| -3 | Women like me nowWell, I'm a young hot chick and I'm dating a young hot male feminist who plays Magic the Gathering 2 to 3 nights a week and I wouldn't change a thing. (He's been teaching me how to play and I won my first 4-person free-for-all match on Friday, go me!) Me when I lie. When you see a girl with a good looking guy, you automatically assume he's rich? That he's super "masculine"? Stoic? Such an "alpha"? You have no idea who he is, he's a stranger to you. You are making assumptions about people even th… | /r/ExRedPill | 27/02/24 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Women like me nowWell, I'm a young hot chick and I'm dating a young hot male feminist who plays Magic the Gathering 2 to 3 nights a week and I wouldn't change a thing. (He's been teaching me how to play and I won my first 4-person free-for-all match on Friday, go me!) Me when I lie. When you see a girl with a good looking guy, you automatically assume he's rich? That he's super "masculine"? Stoic? Such an "alpha"? You have no idea who he is, he's a stranger to you. You are making assumptions about people even th… | /r/ExRedPill | 27/02/24 11:35 PM |
| -1 | Women like me nowIt's just an easily observable trend, as the other commenter said. My eyes. I dont know why you assume I watch that human traffickers content and I don't know who the other one is. I go outside for walks often so I don't know what sort of impact your slight at the end is supposed to have. | /r/ExRedPill | 27/02/24 11:30 PM |
| -10 | Women like me nowYes, some women want a "rich macho alpha stoic chad". *most Not some | /r/ExRedPill | 27/02/24 06:23 PM |
| 1 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I mean I really wish I could but it's hard to let myself imagine a future where I'm worth anything or even worthy of having value. I appreciate the sentiment though | /r/ExRedPill | 23/02/24 12:07 AM |
| 1 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:Anyone who considers one high is stupid. I think I'd place insanely high somewhere around 20-25. But age is a factor that changes that number, my range is for my age group(22) and thats really high. Uncomfortable range would be 10-15 | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:Damn thats actually a really good metaphor for it. Guess I'm just a pathetic pile of shit(I already knew this) | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 10:47 PM |
| 0 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:But a lot of people aren't, and it's certainly something that can be fear inducing. Even if it doesn't happen all that often, to be subject to finding that out about your partner when they hid it from you would be awful. For me at least | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:05 PM |
| 0 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:It's fine that you're scared of people with a sexual past Why does my emotional reaction to someone having a big sexual past matter in this case? Like I'm genuinly asking not being an ass or anything. I can't wrap my head around the logic, cause in my mind it's normal to be wary of something like that and actually makes more sense to. Like the rational and emotional thinking coincide here to me | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:04 PM |
| 0 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I've observed enough for it to be something I'm wary of. Who cares if observed people that didn't fit what I'm saying, I never once said its all women, just a lot. Why do you keep insisting I'm implying its all, if I said all at any point I'll take it back cause it's certainly not. Anyone can think emotionally or rationally, that's not a gender locked thing. I do both. Although yes maybe my emotions outweigh my rational thinking here but I dont see how that invalidates my point. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 02:59 PM |
| 0 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I didn't make anything up, its an easily observable trend. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 02:56 PM |
| -3 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:There's no reason to believe they are unbalanced. There's no fact to prove that they are unbalanced. Wow it's almost like I never stated is fact. It's a common denomination that people who whore themselves out have all the properties I listed. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:18 AM |
| -3 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:have a fulfilling romantic life and are well adjusted. I feel sorry for their partners if they're not aware of the partners previous nature, or current tbh. If they acted like that in the past I wouldn't be surprised if they fell back into it. Remember that point I made about poor self control? People who can't keep it in their pants tend to stay that way. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:17 AM |
| -5 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I dont care I'm getting downvoted, they're imaginary internet points. If your only reply is to explain why I'm being downvoted dont talk to me pretty please. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:14 AM |
| -9 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:Did I ever say they're guarenteed to be like that? No I didn't, I just said its highly likely. And I wouldn't personally want to take that risk if I'm dating someone(not that I'd ever land a date lol). What about what I said is misogynistic? I'm not judging anyone or thinking lesser of them, it's just an observation of common outcomes. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 03:12 AM |
| 0 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I'm genuinly curious how this view would be bad so I would love an explanation. | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 12:40 AM |
| -19 | Here’s why it doesn’t make sense to care about a women’s number of sexual partners if you don’t care more about education when looking to avoid divorce:I'm not reading all that but here's my 2 cents on it based on your title. If the amount of sexual partners is reasonable or low than sure why tf should I care. But if she has an insanely high amount of previous sexual partners that is something to he concerned about. It likely means she has poor critical thinking skills, no self control, probably some sort of mental baggage that I respectfully don't want to deal with. There's a high likely hood she could have any numbers of stds and very likely … | /r/ExRedPill | 22/02/24 12:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter