| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseI am curious to see how many additional accounts you will make to manipulate the voting... | /r/MensRights | 25/06/12 04:25 PM |
| -1 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseI like how you pick random things to make your case as though you couldn't read a whole post. Maybe you can't... You compare circumcision with mastectomy. You still haven't answered my question as to why you feel the need to use such hyperbole. Or why you deny doing so while then correcting your idiotic statement. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 01:54 PM |
| -1 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseYes, and yet you corrected yourself in the post above. You still haven't answered my question, by the way. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 01:44 PM |
| -1 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseThat weak argument is not making your case. It is your example. I find it interesting that you don't even try to find a reasonable analogy, but have to go right for hyperbole. Why do you think that is? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 01:33 PM |
| -4 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseI am not for circumcision either - see my comment above - but what an idiotic comparison to make. If this is such a great idea, why hasn't there also been recent discussion about neonatal mastectomy as a means of reducing the risk of breast cancer? Those are your words. It isn't helping anything to make these kinds of exaggerated, ridiculous comparisons. Try just making a argument based on why circumcision is wrong on its own without the drama. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseThis is great. Hats off to Australia. If men chose to do this later, that is fine, but you should not modify a child's body unless there is an immediate threat to their life like a gangrenous limb. Unfortunately this kind of thing is incredibly widespread. Gynecology in the US is rife with his to the point that at one national OBY/GYN conference, the keynote speaker advised the attendees that if they play their cards right, they will have a "crop" of women" every year to perform hysterectomy on.… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 12:53 PM |
| -2 | Neonatal male circumcision and cancer || Cancer Council Australia press releaseBecause there is a vast difference between removing a piece of foreskin and leaving a working, healthy penis, and removing a woman's breasts which aside from being physically obvious, would prevent the woman from breastfeeding if she so chose. Some women choose to have a mastectomy because cancer is very prevalent in their families, the key word being decide. Did you really need this spelled out for you? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 12:27 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter