TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wehavecrashed Archive

View 0 posts and 150 comments by Wehavecrashed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Honestly who cares if some woman wants to set an unreasonably high bar? Just ignore her like everyone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/21 08:36 PM
1

If she is offering to suck a guy's dick for $20 worth of weed, she probably isn't a very attractive person, physically or personality.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 07:12 AM
-1

Nice of you to cite your source there.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 06:23 AM
16

Did your mum have sex with a 19th century beggar?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 04:30 AM
0

That's what happens when a parent doesnt care for their child. You might not have known that.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 04:29 AM
1

That's because you're ignorant and have a warped view of society.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 04:28 AM
9

I don't think you were arguing about custody if that's what they said.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 12:40 PM
2

Because you don't want to have a legal battle over their custody?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 12:39 PM
8

There was a study that showed that women with the same qualifications as men were offered less for the same position.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 08:08 AM
7

Hot topic is an understatement.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:14 AM
1

Just wear a go pro at all times.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:13 AM
1

If he was an illegal immigrant and a terrorist he would be welcomed with open arms. I really hope you aren't referring to Australia with that bit.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 04:41 AM
1

The feminist doctrine is in full/growing force in many industries today including the media Keep in mind, at the end of the day their goal isn't brainwashing, it's to earn money. When a kid says guys should buy tampons and pads they are going to agree with it because they will sell more. Hell id go so far as to say they don't give a shit how women are portrayed in the media, or how they affect it, either positively or negatively, it's just about money.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 05:42 PM
-6

The statistics for kids raised by single mothers shows all manner of dysfunction (poverty, mental illness, crime) for kids raised by single mothers Correlation is not causation. If those statistics were the higher amongst black peoples compared to white people would you call black people sub human scum?
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 09:27 AM
1

I used to be the kid in school who didn't mind buying condoms, and would loan them out of a bro/broette needed them. Tampons would have been in the same thread. Now of he's doing it because he's just considerate, good on him. I might be a little soft on him or optimistic, but I'm fairly sure you just summed it up pretty well. I'm confident that OP has way overthought this. Hopefully he's just gone overboard on an idea that he thinks is a great one.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 07:31 AM
-1

Whilst I think that whole movement is pretty fucking dumb, I also think you are reading into it way too much and you're a few months too late. The lack of space thing is a really minor point, but yes i wouldn't expect guys to carry around a pack of tampons or a pad in their pocket all the time, that's just silly and pretty much pointless. The lack of agency I think you are reading into it way too much, I'm fairly sure a 15 year old girl isn't going to want to ask a 15 year old boy for a tampon o…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 07:17 AM
1

Well there's kinda a difference there, one is getting someone else pregnant the other is getting yourself pregnant, it would be like tricking a girl into giving you her eggs. They are both immoral but one is quite different to the other, the woman in the OP wasn't effecting the guy until she wanted child support, (stealing is sperm is still crazy and immoral and she shouldn't get child support) the guy in your scenario is making someone pregnant.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:25 AM
-1

It doesn't matter, you've made it clear that you absolutely agree that the woman should be able to do whatever the hell she wants (If she didn't, there wouldn't be a child that she can't support in the first place) and someone else has to deal with her messes,
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:21 PM
-2

More hyperbole! Hooray for making compelling points in arguments! At least you are consistent.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:02 PM
-2

Bodily autonomy includes deciding who to work for and how much, which men in this situation are denied. Why? What makes that baby so special that reinstating slavery is called for? We might need some definitions here so you don't keep overreacting and making hyperbolic statements. Bodily integrity is the inviolability of the physical body and emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy and the self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. It considers the violation of bodily integ…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:46 PM
0

Serious question here: Should the use of a gamete without the consent of it's owner in the creation of a fetus be illegal? Because she hasn't technically stolen the sperm, he did give it to her.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:35 AM
-1

My beliefs around abortion stem from the bodily autonomy argument. Nobody should be forced to bare a child against their will regardless of their circumstances. Once that baby is born however, I believe they should be given every chance in life to succeed. If you still think that arguement makes my hypocritical then ok.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:28 AM
0

No I'm not.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:13 AM
-3

I don't really give a shit about what the parents what and just want what's best for the child.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:54 AM
2

They aren't wrong. Especially the anti feminist part. I'm not saying that it should be blocked, but this subreddit fits that category.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 12:04 PM
-2

I believe in equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. Is that what you mean? What exactly does that mean? How can you support equal opportunities for both genders but not equal outcomes for both genders? Are you saying if a man and a woman do the exact same thing they shouldn't have the same outcome? You're not a big fan of abstract thought, are you? Let's move on. Well there's abstract thought, and their making up your own definition to a word. .I guess what would happen is happening r…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 11:26 AM
1

I have a question before we kick things off, Do you believe that society should treat both men and women the same? (Within reason) Also a Tl;DR for that wall of text. You really need to stop using 'existing' and 'doing' they don't mean what you are saying and most feminist issues don't require active campaigning to create change, change is happening naturally. Congratulations, you totally win that argument. Well done. Cool, we are done here right? oh. Do you act upon your belief to create a chan…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 08:03 AM
2

You can hold beliefs about things such as this and not act on them and still exist. Just because I don't act on my opinions regarding gender equality (for both genders because that's what equality means) doesn't mean I don't have those opinion or don't exist. I don't have an impact on law making, that's true but again, I still have these opinions. They're complaining about the feminism that actually EXISTS in the world. That's the feminism you perceive, and you exclusively view it as negative.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 05:53 AM
1

So you're assuming women act logically? Despite all evidence otherwise? 50% of the population is illogical, what? Actual victims rarely whine and cry about it. Those who have victimized are angry and work to avoid it ever happening again. It's a viable strategy for manipulation and power wielding for women but a kiss of death for a man. More inane gibberish.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 03:26 AM
1

It's not evidence, it a logical deduction. No it's taking it to an illogical extreme. This is TRP, most have a dim view on the MRA approach precisely because it relies on victimhood. So what, are you saying that there are no victims in society because of gender? How about both? I'd say it's more likely that it was because of fat parents than single mothers or 'beta' fathers. Also what's your problem with single mothers?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 04:15 PM
1

Feminism relies on victimhood and women not having agency. You can say the same thing about men's rights activists. They do rely on victimhood because in society there are issues that both men and women are victims in. This will always result in HAES/fat acceptance. I don't see any evidence of that. Most likely by a single mother...or at best some beta dad. Actually most likely some fat people.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 02:49 AM
-1

What does any of that have to do with fat acceptance? An inane rant against feminists is not a solid argument.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 12:42 PM
-1

There's multiple problems with this line of thought, firstly not all feminists push the exact same ideals and being a feminist doesn't mean you think being fat is fine or acceptable. I'd say that a lot believe the media portrays women in an unhealthy way by saying that the best body a women can have is a supermodel's. This idea can transform into a health body doesn't have to be a supermodel's, which easily changes into HAES. Take a look at these two articles about feminist issues, both include …
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 11:46 AM
-11

Fat acceptance- one of the leading issues in feminism- almost killed me. That's just wrong. I'm happy for you the changes you've made in your life are great but come on, how is fat acceptance even an issue for feminists, yet alone a leading one?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 06:29 AM
-1

The videogames industry as of now (specifically the indie scene) has been one of the deepest breeding grounds for some of the most rampant Social Justice and radical feminism you have ever seen There is also huge amounts of sexism in the video game community.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 07:11 AM
1

Id just like to point this out at the start. This discussion is actually quite pleasant and I am grateful that it is progressing pleasantly. The culture is different because we aren't free to choose what we want unless it lies in tandem with Feminism's ideals. I'm not sure what you mean here, could you give me an example of exactly what you are talking about? Women who cook, clean and stay at home to raise the next generation of CEOs, actors, athletes and role models are seen as "victimized" "op…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:48 AM
1

Ok now with those genuinely interesting sources (you aren't living up to your name) I might have a crack at some discussion about this topic. I think it's important to remember that correlation does not imply causation and for both of your cited sources there are other factors that influence both issues. It's important to note that say in the Netherlands there is a very different culture and lifestyle to that of Americans. For example they have little violence against women, ultra-low rates of t…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 03:01 PM
-1

Most women are not feminists, a lot of the women in real life you encounter think feminism is stupid What you are saying is: Most women do not support equality amongst sexes and they think this idea is stupid. Yes there are retarded feminists but these people are usually the vocal minority I think you will find that most women will support the basic ideas that "loud feminists" suggest. For example a "feminists" might say that domestic violence against women is horrible and needs to be stopped, m…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 07:11 AM
1

Oh, right. Yer a feminist. Of course you're a moron. Right people who want equality amongst sexes are morons. So the same thing would apply to men's rights activists? Yes and yes. If I deem that Anal is something I won't have a relationship without, and my girl won't give me anal... So to you a relationship is nothing more than sex? If that is the case then your point is right on and I agree with you. which is why he'd commit to a non-feminine beast of a feminist like you I may have confused you…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:57 AM
1

There is factual data that posits that for women, the more partners they have, the more likely they are to initiate divorce. Source? Oh wait... in all seriousness I would genuinely like to see that study. I disagree that beta men are a significant factor in divorce rates. Pair bonding is a chemical activity that is diminished the more a woman has sex. It is similar for men, but they aren't the ones initiating divorce in droves and causing 10-30% of paternity tests to fail. Gender roles? That que…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:45 AM
1

It's only sexist if you believe men and women to be biologically, physiologically, and mentally the same. Just because you experience uncomfortable truths doesn't make them bigoted or otherwise. Yes men and women aren't the same there are small biological differences overall, yes the average women isn't the same as the average man but every human isn't an average human. You will find women that have very "masculine" traits and men that have very "feminine" traits and people who don't feel like t…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 03:47 AM
1

Given enough incentive, a woman will cheat. So will a man. Given enough incentive you can make people do almost anything. Roses are red. Violets are blue. Women will cheat Sucks if it's on you. Honestly I don't understand where this "all women are cheating whores" attitude comes from. I think it stems from the belief that all women think and act the same. (Which you see all over this sub) If you have been cheated on that sucks but not all women are the same. Maybe I have forgotten how to read bu…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 07:25 AM
1

No one here thinks of women as less than human Well I would say that plenty of people here think that women are lesser humans. You can only change yourself. Anything else is inane rationalization. Look if that's all the red pill was that would be fine but that's simply not true. The red pill is an anti women circle jerk disguised as talk of self improvement. Which is why sexist posts constantly rise to the top of this sub.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 07:15 AM
-1

Because it's men against women.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 07:42 AM
-2

has enough plausible deniability for the hamster to justify infidelity by saying "I'm not married, I still have my maiden name after all!". It always come back to women cheating and betraying men on /r/theredpill. I wonder why? maybe the kind of woman who /r/theredpill men seduce are just like that?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 06:07 AM
-8

All women who earn nearly as much as you are masculine and not worth the trouble of living with them? To earn a high income you have to give up your physical beauty that ALL men find attractive? And they trade them to the devil? Are you high right now or do you actually think like this. Good job generalising all women. I never said that women can't have careers or that they can be independent and live the life they want to live. You just said they have to give up their female side to do that. Ho…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:55 AM
-4

I'm going to quote that bestof post for you. You don't need to be an Alpha. You're not a damned dog. You're a human being. Human beings can communicate complex concepts, rebel against their base instincts to find better ways of doing things, and above all, reflect on their actions and empathize.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:45 AM
-4

Assuming she is willing to accept the roles that having plenty of estrogen and being feminine makes her good at doing. Like what exactly? First, it's very unlikely that I will ever date or marry a girl who makes more money than me I'll assume you work in a high paying field that doesn't mean you won't marry a woman who earns a similar level of income to you. If I want children and settle down, you can bet I going to marry someone who wants to be a mother and housewife and not someone who wants t…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:23 AM
0

That's it? Nothing more to say? Ok well have a nice life. (and I do mean that sincerely)
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:12 AM
-3

Just replace hunting for food with going to work to make money and you have the same goals with different ways of achieving them. This would be true if in every family the mother stayed at home and the father worked to provide for the family. Nowadays this isn't true. In most if not all the families I know both of them have jobs, and obviously this can vary greatly in different income areas and cultures but in my experience there is little difference between the male and the female in providing …
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:02 AM
-10

Yeah, because wanting a girl to have my last name when we marry is the same as her becoming my slave who gives blow jobs and makes sandwiches on demand. ;) Ok I will admit that I was taking that to it's logical extreme but you do see people who advocate that sort of thing on this sub. she can expect that I will expect the same from her. And if she provides the same thing what exactly is the problem? you will bet I'll never marry her and I will never make any sort of decision that puts my financi…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:49 AM
-2

Ok I think I can get a few reasons why you would keep your maiden name. Well for starters it's a person's identity. I shouldn't really have to go on with this point. If you have a double barrel name then it signifies that the child belongs to both parent not just the father. If you have an established career say a doctor or lawyer then your maiden name has an established reputation which is easier to keep it. That's a few reasons, they aren't hugely important but neither are the reasons for it. …
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:37 AM
-6

In that sense yes you are EACH OTHERS property but what the other guys was saying was that men are taking possession over their wife. One person takes the other's name.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:24 AM
-12

So if your SO wants to have a life she can't be with you?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:08 AM
-8

Yes there small are practical benefits for keeping the father's name. They are however small and honestly pretty inconsequential. The idea behind a surname is that is both gives you a lineage to look back upon and provides a solid base for family unity. That's very true. Ultimately, as the man you will be leading the family, This is 2014 the concept of the nuclear family and gender roles are breaking down as we speak. Men don't always lead families, in some they aren't even present. making the h…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 03:57 AM
-16

I am struggling to make a reply to that. I just completely disagree with everything you are saying. I will just say that women are human beings they are not objects to posses.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 03:13 AM
-11

Well if it is a deal breaker then you probably would discuss it, I just don't see how it would be a deal breaker. It's seems to me like they are saying, when you marry me you become mine and you have to show that if you can't do that we are over. Of course there could be a completely different reason to that, but it's the first thing that comes to mind.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:49 AM
-23

So you can reach the point where you want to marry the woman you love, but if she won't take your name that's a deal breaker?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:30 AM
-8

That argument seems to label her as a hypocrite before you have even heard her reasons or opinion. She might have a valid reason why she doesn't want to take the name OR maybe she will agree with you on the issue of the ring. You should ask your buddy what her reason is. I know plenty of women who kept their maiden name, hell my mother did I think it's a really inconsequential issue.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:20 AM
-5

So what you are saying is that if you can't have anal sex with someone, you can't commit to being in a full relationship with them? and does the same thing apply to you?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:10 AM
1

He made 25 points but I can totally sum them all up in one sentence.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:04 PM
-4

You guys know you have to subscribe to this subreddit to comment right? Right? You do know that...
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 01:49 PM
1

See if you had some sort of logical argument you wouldn't need to attack me personally, but you don't. Either you aren't smart enough to come up with any or there aren't any. Everything you say begins with an exclamation at someone's inability to comprehend simple concepts and follow logic Well you don't seem to be able to so it is fair enough. If someone doesn't reply to you in less than 24 hours, you reply to yourself with an exclamation of how good counter argument must've completely stumped …
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:13 AM
1

That's actually kinda funny. You come along and strongly assert that your view is right and mine is wrong, then when I question that you suddenly don't care and think I'm childish for wanting to have a rational discussion with you.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 03:36 AM
-1

I probably shouldn't have expected you to actually respond with some sort of thought out response or anything at all for that matter. Once again shows that you can't actually back up your sexist view points when you are faced with logic.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 08:59 AM
1

Nothing to say? I would have been disappointed if I didn't already know you weren't going to say anything.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 08:49 AM
1

I am actually very curious as to why you said They do and always will because people need them to. As I said in my reply do you have any reasons for this? I am genuinely interested in why you think this. I wanted to have a conversation with you but you don't seem to be willing to do it at all. Maybe you have some really interesting points on the subject, but I will never know because instead you chose to belittle my view. Also I'm glad you can have sex for what was it, 3 days straight? Good for …
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 03:46 AM
1

Once again you prove I'm right if you really had any sort of retort to what I'm saying you would have presented it by now. Instead you once again resort to childish insults in some sort of attempt to discredit what I am saying. You Red Pillers are all the same, you are fine to circle jerk your own opinions but when they break down when actually critiqued you spew pathetic insults and run away to hide from reality. Face it you know I'm right. Or you could surprise me and actually think up a count…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 01:36 AM
1

I guess you have nothing to say? Has a logical argument completely stumped you? Or are you just bidding your time. My guess is that your follow up will be more childish insults but I could be wrong.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 08:37 AM
0

He might not want to, variety is the spice of life.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 10:57 PM
1

That wasn't actually my point. That was an extension of the idea that the distinction between men and women is becoming smaller and more blurred as time goes on. The distinction or lack thereof and the changes to our society over the last 100 years are the reasons why we don't need gender roles. I would completely disagree with you when you say we need gender roles, can you give me a reason why we do need them? Especially the always part. They simply are less and less relevant to our society now…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 01:51 AM
1

So you agree that you have no retort? Well I guess I'm right then unless you actually do have a retort and you are saving it up.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 06:47 AM
0

You know how I can tell I'm actually right? Because you don't actually have any retorts just meaningless childish insults.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 10:08 PM
0

Of course you did, because you have no retort. Basically yeah. Gender roles exist because men and women are different, and no amount of wishing they are the same is going to change that. But they don't have to be, you can already get a sex change, but what is stopping a woman becoming a tradesperson or a man being a housemaker? The answer is nothing. It is because of those differences that seeking equality (equality which will never be accomplished because men and women are not equal) creates a …
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:55 AM
0

In other words, you don't understand moral hazard. No I ignored that question and posed my own. Of course you don't. You're still thinking that equality is possible and even desirable. Yes it is possible and yes it is desirable, just like you want men's rights to improve I want men and women's rights to improve. I, on the other hand, understand that seeking equality creates a system of female supremacy. Equality ≠ Equality? That makes sense. There is no possible equality between men and women be…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:59 PM
0

I don't understand you. You are pro mens rights correct? because you believe men aren't equal to women in some regards prison sentences and child custody are two that spring to mind fairly quickly and want to correct that? But you are anti feminist because you believe that women shouldn't be equal to men in other areas? It seems rather hypocritical.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 03:12 AM
-1

So you are saying the majority of people shouldn't have the vote because they are different to you?
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:01 PM
-1

It's good that you can admit these things.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:06 AM
0

Stop what? Making counter arguments to backwards and outdated ideas? Trying to combat stupidity and hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:32 AM
0

So people like you?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:45 PM
0

Again you seem to be suggesting that if you don't fight a particular ideology you must be in support of it. This is wrong. And once again you have ignored my other points, did you even watch the video? Or this thread http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27ef5w/can_men_and_women_be_equal/ci3d66o Admit it, whenever you find yourself in a corner you stick your fingers in your ears and yell LA LA LA LA CAN'T HEAR YOU NOT LISTENING.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:09 PM
0

First why don't you watch this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi_27bpIb30&channel=HumanTV
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:47 PM
0

If and only if you can demonstrate that they have called out and combated the radical element of feminism. Why exactly do they need to call out and combat to disagree with them? and while I go get some examples would you mind responding to my points that you ignored?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:06 PM
0

Those who hate men, and those who silently support them. So in effect all feminists hate men? That is wrong. I'm not sure how you got that into your head but it is wrong. Would you like me to start listing people who don't hate men and are feminists? Honestly your worldview is breaking down and you are scared so you are shutting it out. Stay inside your pathetic misogynist bubble keep hating women and stay in the past. A feminist doesn't hate men, in the same way that a men's rights activist doe…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:41 PM
1

You stated you were a third type of feminist (a non-radical who fights against radicals). So of fucking course I need proof that you've combated radical feminists. No I said that there were more than two kinds of feminist, because to say that there are only two is completely ridiculous. Here are some different types of feminist thanks to wikipedia. Liberal Anarchist Socialist and Marxist Radical Cultural Separatist and lesbian Black and womanist Chicana Asian American Native American Multiracial…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:29 PM
0

You have no more retorts so you simply resort to insults? Petty. You footwave away anything that challenges your world view, and try to weasel out of stupid, inconsistent statements you make.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:01 AM
0

Is that really all you can come up with as a retort? Is that literally the best you can do? That's rather sad. No bizarrely Radical does not equal mainstream.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:34 AM
1

Wait so to prove that there are more than two kinds of feminist I need to not only denounce radical feminists I also need to aggressively attack people because of their beliefs? Also radical does not equal mainstream (incase you didn't realise)
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:01 AM
1

mainstream |ˈmeɪnstriːm| noun (the mainstream) the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are shared by most people and regarded as normal or conventional The definition of mainstream should be fairly obvious but apparently not.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:51 AM
0

Ok I am a feminist that doesn't fall into either of your categories therefore your theory is invalid. Did you click on the Link I sent you? It has numerous different kinds of feminists.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:30 PM
1

I can't disprove that there are only two types of feminist? Because I guarantee you I can.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:06 PM
1

What do you actually think a mainstream feminist is? Because it isn't a youtube personality like Aanita Sarkeesian, A "mainstream" feminist is simply someone who wants gender equality. Here you go http://bit.ly/1o9Gwrv Lets take a look at some of those names. John Lennon, Joss Whedon, Patrick Stewart, Ellen Page, Kurt Cobain and Hilary Clinton. Just some names I pulled off that list. Do you think these people believe the same things as so called "radical feminists"
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:13 PM
1

Here is a perfect example of what I just said, You lump everyone into two groups that is ridiculous to the point of satire are you actually serious when you say that? You probably haven't interacted with 99% of feminists, or maybe you have and you haven't realised.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:01 PM
1

If you actually go and look you will find plenty of feminists denouncing radicals, it's happening right now. I think that feminist radicals are idiots. Your problem is that you lump people into groups to fit your world view, all feminists are feminazis that are trying to destroy men not people who want gender equality.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:51 PM
0

You are a moron, should Christianity be judged by the westboro baptist church? Islam by al Qaeda? Or literally any other radical group? If one atheist wants to kill all religious people does that mean that all atheists think that way?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:21 PM
0

No. You'd like to believe that, but no. How can you even say that? How can you actually say that women simply don't "advance" society. You also haven't said what advance means. No. Men and women impact society in very different ways, not even close to equally. This is once again too vague to mean anything, because you are using vague terms like impact and advance. That without women motiving men, men wouldn't advance. So you are saying that without sex, as a pleasure the human race would simply …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:33 PM
0

I didn't say that, did I? When you learn how to read, come back. No you said society rides on the backs of men, meaning that women don't impact society. Advance, accomplish, and do those things which advance society. So do women. Advance, accomplish, and do those things which advance society. Perhaps when you learn what actually advances society Could you perhaps put that in manner that is even vaguer? So men advance and accomplish and advance and advance and advance and advance and advance and …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:48 PM
0

Society rides on the backs of men. 50% of people have no impact on society. Sure thing buddy. Women, children, and secure marriage is one of the biggest carrots which exist for men Motivate them to do what? Maybe if you clarified yourself a bit I could take apart your argument but that reply is lacking in any depth.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:43 PM
1

On top of that, gender roles were much better for advancing society. How?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:20 AM
-1

You realise that definitions do change?
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 03:36 AM
-3

You need to get down off your high horse and stop trying to be the Thought Police. That would be a fair enough point if you weren't doing the same thing. Go back to /r/ShitRedditSays Fuck /r/shitredditsays it's far worse than the red pill the people there are fucked in the head. or /r/TheBluePill The Subreddit made to mock this one? Sure.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 09:36 AM
-8

There's no reason you can't treat women as humans as well as fuck toys. But you won't because all you don't see women for anything but fucking. You've been so heavily brainwashed by feminist propaganda You have been brainwashed by red pill propaganda. that you think a man having sexual desires for a woman is misogyny. First of all I don't think that but keep thinking up shitty counter arguments. Secondly you can have sexual desires for a woman without whilst still treating her as a human. You ne…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 09:01 AM
1

Well that would depend on what she is saying no to. She is a human being and does have her own life and you might be clingy or pestering her. That being said you could be entirely right it depends on the context.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 08:27 AM
-7

So alphas don't treat women as humans?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 08:01 AM
-15

Why don't you just treat women as humans instead of fuck toys?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:11 AM
1

The entirety of feminism has this problem. It's as if you think all feminists are exactly the same.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 04:07 AM
2

Because all women are the same they are one collective mass that all work together.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:34 AM
1

Well I think it helps that you need to be subscribed to comment.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:24 AM
2

Well probably because it isn't as black and white as you make it out to be. Yes our society is misogynistic, but only to a certain degree, there are also men's rights issues. And yes our Children are raised by women, but they are also raised by men.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 01:19 PM
1

That would depend on what you would consider women's clothing. Not sure how it is relevant.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 01:03 PM
1

Correlation is not causation.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 12:46 PM
-1

I don't think people say sex roles. Gender roles are usually what they are called. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_role
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 12:47 PM
-1

As far as circumcision goes, you seem to know little about that topic either Huh? I was for the most part agreeing with the sentiment I just don't think you really even need to use such emotive and hyperbolic language. If you just present it as what it is I see that as bad enough. No medical organization in the world recommends this procedure. America is the only first world country to perform infant circumcision for non-religious reasons. The most common reason given is aesthetic preference—spe…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 11:37 AM
-6

As I said, I wasn't talking about father figures. That being said, the article also complains that children are raised largely by women, which would fit Gender Roles that women stay home and look after the kids whilst the men go and work. Then it goes on to say that children are further influenced by women as they are also dominate in nurses, therapists, school teachers, and caregivers Again they are fields dominated by women because of the gender roles that TRP likes so much. The article then t…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 08:14 AM
1

A woman can choose to have sex whenever she wants. This lessens her value of it, even if she never exercises it I disagree I think the act itself is more valuable than being able to do it also most people don't go around thinking "Oh I could fuck that person, yeah that person too, all those guys" It's more do I want to fuck that person.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:51 AM
-6

The article does focus on lacking a father figure but it isn't the only thing raised in the article.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:39 AM
-6

Well my post was not worded very well that's for sure but it was coming from observations about the subreddit. This sub seems very Pro-Gender roles then complains from a natural outcome from those gender roles.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:15 AM
-13

So redpillers are pro gender roles and want the female to be an at home mother, then they complain when their child is raised by a woman?
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 06:03 AM
-1

I wasn't defending her it's just something to consider.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 12:01 AM
-1

Well firstly there is a difference between having sexy drunk and driving drunk.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 10:13 PM
-6

Or does alcohol rob women of agency, therefore they should be banned from it? No that's not what I said... I was simply saying that she might not have been sober to make a proper decision, but she might not care anyway. I don't know I was speculating.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 01:58 PM
-11

That woman seemed pissed. Was she sober enough to actually give consent?
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 01:25 PM
0

Ok I didn't say a slut was a bad person but... let me try clear things up. women don't value sex simply because they can get it whenever they want. Just because a woman CAN have sex with anyone doesn't mean a woman WANTS to have sex with anyone. You seem to think that women just fuck random dude for the sake of it, most people actually care about who they sleep with. most of the time anyway. really, how hard is it to understand this? Look I understand what you are saying I just disagree. Now ont…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 01:13 PM
-2

Are you saying that all women are sluts?
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 12:18 PM
-1

There is a difference between a high sex drive and valuing sex highly. OP said that women don't value sex. I disagreed.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 10:00 PM
2

More men than women are obese in America.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 01:07 PM
-21

For women, because sex isn't scarce, it isn't valuable. The act of sex itself for them holds much less importance because they can get it any time from any source. Oh god. Are you actually that stupid? Most humans value sex, thats why we form strong relationships and adultery is taken so seriously(in our society) Yes some women don't value sex at some point in their lives but they are probably not attracted to the person they are turning down and are looking for someone better.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 12:51 PM
1

So you can't actually answer the question. You wanted to keep gender roles and force everyone to follow your interpretation of them... for no reason. Real fucking smart.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 03:35 PM
1

Can't you answer the question? What use do gender roles serve in our society?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 10:11 PM
1

So you can't explain it you need to link to something else? and does it even answer my question? What use do gender roles serve in our society?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 01:41 PM
2

What use do gender roles serve in our society? Answer that.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 12:40 AM
1

You just did it again.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:00 PM
1

What use do gender roles serve in our society? And you have chosen to ignore most of my arguments.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 12:56 PM
1

Has it occurred to you that gender roles based on our ancestors' lives are not relevant to our society and are And this is the most important part, useless.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:13 AM
2

Firstly you didn't define what you think it means to be a man. Secondly I'm not sure you are aware of this but not all women want to be the breadwinners of their family and neither do some men. Gender roles are breaking down for BOTH genders. And no it wasn't the role of women in history to reward men. Most humans don't share your fucked up world view. But if you will refuse to listen to logic and reason and want to carry on with your misogyny be my guest.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:43 AM
1

What defines a man? Also you seen to subscribe to the idea that women don't matter in history. This would be wrong. (I'm on my phone so I won't be responding in detail until later)
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 11:52 PM
1

Nice work, taking an argument and applying it to something that misses the point but I will play your game. If a midget is good enough to get to the nba (somehow) he should be allowed to compete. Again you have no right to impose your gender roles on anybody else. That one group is slightly physically weaker naturally and has a vagina whilst the other group is slightly stronger and has a penis. Black people weren't equal with whites until they earned it. Ok that is covering what you haven't addr…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 10:43 PM
0

I'm saying you get what you earn. Black people weren't equal with whites until they earned it. They are. Feel free. You'll find there is a reason that all dominant societies worked off gender roles. Please actually give examples, it makes it much easier to prove you wrong. Who are you to force people to conform to gender roles? and are you saying if we had no gender roles our society would collapse? You say this because you fail to understand real and fundamental differences between men and wome…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 02:41 PM
-3

Ok?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 02:38 AM
-1

Well said. she'd be considered an "alpha" By them, most people don't subscribe to the retarded alpha and beta outlook on humanity. We are as a species better than that.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 01:44 AM
-3

You are saying that people don't deserve to be equal until they earn the right to be equal? I guess some people are more equal than others right? Women are lesser men than men. Considering they want equality with men in male areas of life, they are lesser than the men they are competing with. So until women go back to being women instead of pretending to be men, they are lesser humans. You are effectively saying that old gender roles are correct and shouldn't be challenged. People can't be who t…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 01:32 AM
-6

Also do you think women deserve equality? Because from this post you seem to suggest that you don't. Do you think women are lesser humans than men?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 02:30 PM
-7

It's funny how you talk about all women as if they were one person with one personality. You are combining everything you dislike about women into one generalisation no matter how stupid and inane it is. Grow up.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 12:58 PM
4

It's funny how you talk about all women as if they were one person with one personality.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 10:23 AM
8

You effectively don't respect 50% of the population because you want to have sex with them.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:06 AM
-6

If these women are the only women you know then you are just as shallow and pathetic as them.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:05 AM
0

I am right by clearly and easily available evidence and fact. Find it yourself. I tried my hardest I swear I just couldn't. Maybe you are talking shit?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:27 AM
0

You are a pathetic cunt of a person. Prove it.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:06 AM
0

Go away you stalker douchebag. Seriously, you deranged fuck, it's been like 2 weeks. Since you were wrong and pussied out of admitting it? Seriously dude at this point I'm just trolling you.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:51 AM
0

"FUCK YOU, I should get to dress like a slut how I want but not have any of the consequences." What are the consequences of wearing a short skirt or shorts anyway?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter