TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Weirfish Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by Weirfish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

There's a difference between holding a mirror up to the body shaming her.. verbal sparring partner's beliefs, and sincerely believing them.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:29 PM
4

I don't disagree with you, but "no one's died of it" is really not a good argument. I have shit skin, it likes to come out in eczema and such. If I'm not going out, and no one is coming to me, I'm not gonna bother. I shower frequently enough to keep most of the funk away. Why would I bother risking a potentially painful outcome for something I'll become insensate to in a few minutes anyway?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/21 10:53 PM
5

To be specific, mods have the ability to "distinguish" their posts and comments in the subreddits they modify. At least, that's the term reddit chooses to use. Source: Head nerd of one of the nerdiest subs.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 10:09 PM
0

False equivalence. While both are primary sexual organs, one's internal (and it's common wisdom that you don't fuck with internals), and one's external. The girl didn't 'hammer it in', as it were; it was not an inherantly violent act. She aroused him. I'd wager it's more common for men to understand that a woman's vagina is not literally infinite in depth, than it is for women to understand that an aroused penis can suffer crush injuries relatively easily. Not to say what she did was good, by an…
/r/MensRights29/04/17 03:11 PM
8

"Raped with a bottle" is pushing it a bit. His girlfriend asked him to put his flaccid dick in a bottle, he did, she got him hard without realising that it could do damage, his dick was damaged. He thought it was a sex thing, she did it because she thought it'd be funny (and didn't think it was dangerous). "Raped with a bottle" makes it sound like she "1 Man 1 Jar"'d him.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 01:06 PM
3

Not just PTSD, but anxiety too! Pretty much anything that triggers a severe involuntary negative brain response. No, that doesn't mean annoyance or frustration, that means panic attacks, intrusive thoughts, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 06:14 PM
2

Is it reasonable to expect everyone to obtain certifiably legitimate governmentally issued proof of ID from their sexual partners? If not, is it reasonable to place the blame on someone for making a decision based on incorrect information, given they showed intent to follow the law?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:17 PM
1

I guess we should do away with "heterosexual" while we're at it, then. Same difference, lexically. I agree that that's bullshit, but that doesn't mean we should stop using the word "triggered" in relation to mental health, nor that we should automatically dismiss those who use the term. Just the fuckwits who think it's okay to misuse it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:28 PM
3

To be honest, having a term beyond "non-trans" is useful, and it's already got an applied precedent of meaning. The issue with triggers, moreso than anything else, is that they have a precedent for use in mental health already.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:25 AM
3

Anxiety can be triggered too. I find it hard to eat at a table with others, regardless of how well I know them, without having a panic attack. Being in large groups of people with no way to get away for a breather can do it too.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:23 AM
3

"Unless she's selling the cookies as part of a business venture, and possibly even otherwise, because it'd be a violation of one of the many, many pieces of legislation in place that prevents commercial discrimination on the basis of gender, sex, age, race and a whole bunch of other things. Of course, this only really matters if it can be proved that she was being sexist, but it'd still be incredibly unethical, if not illegal."
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:20 PM
1

You have no right to judge others for their choice of life partner, unless it's in order to choose a life partner. ie, in a monogamous relationship, you probably wouldn't want to be the partner of a person whose other partners you can't stand, because that's gonna be emotionally exhausting for the person in the middle.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:01 PM
3

You get to choose your friends based on emotion You get to choose your colleagues based on intellectual similarities (ideally) You get to choose your sexual stimulation based on your physical attraction. Your life partner is someone that you must be friends with, you must work with them, and you must be physically attracted to (at least in some aesthetic sense). You might have dozens of friends, you might have dozens of colleagues, you might have dozens of sources of sexual stimulation. Traditio…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:00 PM
4

It's a breach of trust, given the teacher was put in a position of responsibility and authority over the student. Jail is inappropriate, but probation is about right, IMO.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter