TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WellWrested Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by WellWrested on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This reads like something Claude wrote, not a human.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 11:19 PM
1

Uh what exactly do you think men should do to get money?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 03:42 AM
0

If you think working hard and earning money is the bottom, you are out of touch with society and a threat to men.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 03:16 AM
0

Read what I wrote moron. It doesn't have to be for women. The idea is that we don't end up on the bottom.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:44 AM
0

Thats literally about slavery in a stone mine in India. If you're in India, maybe try to escape that...otherwise its not super relevant.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:20 AM
1

Men who have degrees and high salaries live longer...a degree + high income = 16 years longer life expectancy. Its genuinely a better life. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1641443/
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:03 AM
0

You actively want men to be low status and have limited life options? Honestly Im beginning to think MRAs are a threat to men.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:18 AM
8

I think its extremely necessary. One question I have though is what the end goals are. One of the major differences I have with the current MRA community is what a "good life" means. Not everyone, but a lot of people in the community take it to mean doing less work and more hobby time (I think this is why a fair number of MRAs see being a homemaker as a good job). I don't think this a great framework to build around. This does nothing to inspire action, and studies find that it doesn't make peop…
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:26 AM
19

Women have equal representation in the sub-fields that don't (biology mostly). Also if you look at the level of spatial reasoning in engineering schools vs others, it is significantly higher and spatial reasoning correlates with interest in STEM.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:09 PM
2

The first one that comes to mind is the one feminism is explicitly based on: The Iroquois (the Indians from the French and Indian War). They were effectively ruled by Clan Mothers who selected a man to act as a token leader but can (and did) remove him if he didn't do what they wanted. They spent at least the last 200-300 years of their history (before they lost the war) genociding all of the surrounding tribes. Many matriarchal societies are not tremendously advanced technologically. We haven't…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:37 AM
4

Idk...that may be true at very early ages, but meta-analyses on IQ show equal values for boys and girls from at least age 5 onward. Depending on how its measured, girls may have an advantage in language skills but boys do in nonverbal intelligence. I think a lot of this framing comes from male feminists, tbh. Also a lot of the sex differences I think people see tie back to effortful control, but it isn't clear to me if this equalizes over time (adult studies show it as equal but measure it funda…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:58 AM
9

First off, it is worth noting that with the exception of writing, all boys deficits on exams are small and reverse in adulthood (mid-late 20s). Writing I haven't seen data for but its a larger gap than the others so I doubt it reverses. That said, in terms of why boys get worse grades, there are several aspects that come into play here: Sex differences around "effortful control" (basically doing what someone else wants vs what you are drawn to). This accounts for: 40% of the gap Teacher bias in …
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:39 AM
3

This actually does very little. There was a large study done on this in FL and it closed about 11% of the gap. Given that kids have specific developmental windows for language and math that close as they get older, it is not helpful and might be net harmful.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:33 AM
5

I get what they are going for with family formation, and if things worked like they did 10-20 (or even 50) years ago that would be fine, but it doesn't and they're coming off as out of touch with this (IMO). Dating is heavily skewed because of the apps, its a shit show for a majority of men, and a large share of women hate men. Centering identity on that seems like a disaster to me. We need to build succeeding by and for ourselves, and creating good lives we can bring women into if we want.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 02:52 AM
1

With a lot of differences, you can reverse them culturally, but you still see an effect. For example, patriarchal and matriarchal groups of hunter-gatherers were compared on risk taking. Each tribe showed the dominant sex took more risk, but the gap was about 2x as large in the patriarchal society vs the matriarchal one. This is a bit of a one-off but there are a lot of small studies that seem to follow this general frame
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 04:16 AM
1

To me, the solution is to emphasize that it is probabilistic. There's good evidence for a reasonable amount of the differences they claim (for example several meta-analyses have found career desire differences are invariant across cultures, and explain most of the differences in career choice). I don't think the answer is to fight that. To me, its more about recognizing and supporting the people who aren't "probable" and ensuring they have a place in society also
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 04:13 AM
9

"We treat boys like shit." "Boys occasionally say something mean in response. This is a problem and it must be the fault of masculinity."
/r/MensRights05/04/26 07:53 PM
0

Its useful though. They want to lump all of us together so they have a unified target to hate. However, being hated as part of a large unified target tends to build and cement identity. They're actively creating the basis we need for a serious men's movement without us having to lift a finger.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 04:12 AM
6

They magically seem to forget that women are smaller and thus need to eat less on average. Im fairly certain the cost of extra food is more than the cost of tampons
/r/MensRights31/03/26 01:34 AM
10

When resources get tight, groups blame out-groups as an excuse to take their resources. Referencing Germany, they confiscated property for the better part of a decade (6-7 years I think) before the death camps. Ironically, fascism started to fail when they ran out of other people's money. With that said, attacks on men have been going on a lot longer than attacks on capitalism. The "Future is Female" paper calling for reducing men to 10% of the population was published in the 1980s under Ronald …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 06:15 AM
1

Umm since when has that been society's default? And if you are saying that is your default (my assumption), again...why should we believe you?
/r/MensRights21/03/26 04:43 AM
2

Do you have any reason we should believe you won't use selective direction to pick users and clips that reinforce hatred of men, masculinity and the idea that everything men face is men's fault? If this is the default narrative, if you want us to believe you are going to break it, you need to provide evidence you are not planning on following the default.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 02:47 AM
37

I view general equality and being second class very differently but come to basically the same conclusion. Studies consistently show that purpose, autonomy, competence and relatedness are fundamental to creating a good ("flourishing" in academic terms), vital and healthy (physically and mentally) life. Men building men's spaces and groups that have historically acted as a safe space for creating deep bonds is pathologized and attacked. Men being allowed to reach our potential is frequently consi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 08:00 AM
1

I was in a similar situation a couple years ago. My female friends really hated men and the guys in the group were too scared to stand up to them (me included). I got attacked for working in STEM (I was "stealing a job from a woman" apparently), for getting a promotion (same thing, basically), not caring enough about women's issues (I didn't think women should get preferential treatment when they did), etc. I had no one else. I left the group anyway, and lived as a digital nomad for a year, move…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 02:08 AM
3

The thing is its not like when we're at the bottom people will care about us. Look at the men who are at the bottom now: the homeless, unemployed men, etc. No one gives a fk, they're just viewed as a problem and trash that blemishes an otherwise "good" society. If you look at the handful of societies where men don't work, its the same basic story. You'll probably get fed, but have people care about you, treat you as an equal and support you? No.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 01:59 AM
11

I would vote D, I align with them on most things, but at this point, but even with good policy promises I have no trust left. I want to see a fking apology and a loud, explicit change in course with policies that result in tangible improvements for men in education, suicide etc. I want to see that we have a future that actually includes us as equals before I am willing to go near them again.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:07 PM
5

So let them! Parents pass on their beliefs to their kids. The fastest way to reduce the number of women like this is exactly what they're doing. As far as Im concerned we should go out and tell them how hurt we all are by it so they keep it up! lol
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:49 PM
8

I spent about 3 months researching this during COVID. My basic take is over time status and how people are treated follows the prestige of the positions (and assets) you hold. So it would help, its just fking slow.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:03 AM
3

Depends on the issue. On men's issues and M vs F gender issues: right (I feel like the left hates us). On general economic policy and governance: center-left.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:42 PM
11

I work in tech (software dev). Over the last 5 years or so, men have been increasingly seen as pariahs for wanting any type of advancement or success. I work for a fortune 500 company and 80-90% of the managers are women, because the department policy is very clearly to promote from within and to promote women. We hired two junior developers, one is a man the other is a woman. As expected, all the good assignments go to the woman. The man is feeling (rightly) like he's been screwed and left out …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:26 PM
3

I guess the author missed the part where half of gen Z stated they lie about who they vote for. In today's world its not that hard to be anonymous about this stuff
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:20 AM
3

Congrats to both of you!
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:12 AM
1

Notice how they say flipping, not equalizing
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 03:41 AM
1

If you like political jokes Ryan Long is excellent. Has content on Feminism too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev373c7wSRg
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 11:27 PM
12

Well my views are a bit different than most MRAs. As I see it, norms passed equal some time ago and things have largely flipped. I support equality but to me that means equal opportunity, support and recognition for success. I think recent changes mean we lack the latter 2. I find people everywhere absolutely hate my stance until I start giving evidence for it. At that point either they agree and are pretty OK with it or they just get angry. My perception is neoliberals are more supportive than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 03:26 AM
1

Look at by he science on it. When you change norms there is no "averaging" effect, you get what you change to. Because people and cultures are slow to change, flipping norms speeds the process of achieving equality, but because it does not create equal norms you just blow through it and keep going till outcomes match norms. At work atm and don't have the link handy but the Stanford encyclopedia has a good entry on this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 10:33 PM
1

Men are being praised and supported for becoming fathers and focusing on family and caring. Women are being praised for becoming successful and focusing on ambition and career. You can see how people feel about different roles en mass. Men feel neutral about earnings, women are very excited. https://s2.q4cdn.com/437609071/files/doc_news/research/2020/breadwinners-survey.pdf How is this equal?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 08:27 PM
21

Dude you completely missed the point. Creating opposite norms isn't equal. It's just the opposite side of the same coin. If we don't keep similar norms one group falls behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:55 AM
9

Yeah it seems like the general idea these days is if you create the opposite norm it will balance everything out in the end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter