| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesI don’t concede that point because There is nothing that challenges it’s merit. Science is itself based on philosophy hence the philosophy of science so it’s not at all wrong to marry philosophy and science. Inductive reasoning simply cannot make absolute truth claims but it’s useful to find the best possible evidence we have. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/03/21 08:08 PM |
| 1 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesThe problem of induction presented by Hume is a troubling problem for a reason. There isn’t a logical reason why a sample of something can generalize to the whole. This is why even science doesn’t attempt to make absolute truth claims. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/21 12:23 PM |
| 3 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesI agree they shouldn’t but things like “female nature” and red pill ideology often make these sweeping claims. Your points seem to point towards a metaphorical truth where the truth that is useful is more important than the actual truth. Mental states of people can heavily bias the intentions of people so their observations within their social group may not be entirely accurate. As someone with BPD traits, I acknowledge this even within myself all the time. Especially when combining their mental… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/21 12:21 PM |
| 2 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesYou can’t make universal claims from induction, and science even acknowledges this. The problem of induction which I believe was first introduced by David Hume explains this. Inductive processes can be useful in science, but science is way different than someone making biased inferences off of their own non representative observations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/21 12:17 PM |
| 3 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesThe thing is is that these people aren’t performing controlled studies, it’s just their singular anecdotes. They don’t know if they’re experience is representative nor is it rational to infer all women are a certain way because of their own possibly flawed observances | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 11:21 PM |
| 0 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesInductive reasoning is inherently fallacious especially when it’s biased through your singular lenses. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 11:19 PM |
| 2 | CMV: This sub is full of people mistakenly universalizing their specific experiencesNone of what he says is really universalizing. The OP is stating the the sub is full of people, not everybody who ascribes to these beliefs, who universalize their experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 11:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter