TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WestButterscotch8242 Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by WestButterscotch8242 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don’t understand how that challenges my overall point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:33 PM
1

That’s quite the extrapolation from what evidence you did provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:12 PM
1

Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:34 AM
1

Yes we have. We do not know of their cause yet, but they exist. Do you not know that women are, for example, more likely to acquire depression and anxiety, and men are more likely to be schizophrenic?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:31 AM
1

The brain patterns, not necessarily the structure of the brains, but the brain activity of males and females are dimorphic. They are not the same. There is also no continuous spectrum of gendered brain activity, and the activity in a male brain cannot be more similar to the average female than the average male, according to a new study. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/sax-on-sex/202405/ai-finds-astonishing-malefemale-differences-in-human-brain?amp This study does not mention the differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:25 AM
1

Because, as a category, males have different behaviour to the female category. I say this so you do not rebut by mentioning the differences within these categories. Logically, a boy is always more similar to an average specimen of the male category than he is to an average specimen of the female category, otherwise he would not be a boy. To treat these two categories as not being different without regard for the difference (in e.g interests, reactions, communication) will result in either playin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 06:31 PM
1

Does your version of patriarchy theory believe that sexed differences in behaviour caused by biological differences in the brain contribute to patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 06:19 PM
1

Can anyone tell how far the influence of misogyny/bias in STEM working environments goes and biological differences begin?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:44 PM
–

Forgive me for interpreting “it’s not something women do to boys” about circumcision as you saying that women do not circumcise their sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:31 PM
–

Before I insult you for being stupid, do you believe that a women, usually a mother, has never decided that their son should be circumcised?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:23 PM
0

I’m sure that isn’t the only reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:52 PM
–

What does that even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:48 PM
1

Does your version of patriarchy theory believe that patriarchy may be caused by biological differences between the sexes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:45 PM
–

Then the treatment is inadequate for both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:43 PM
1

They do, towards the in group. The in group is the unit of consumption that that individual is a part of. It competes with other groups for resources, but those in the group share resources. The first in group is the immediate family, then multiple genetically related families, which are called clans. This is how human organisation began, and from this eventually came polities and the state. The egalitarian relationship of those in a group is as human and ‘natural’ as the competition and hierarc…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:43 PM
1

It is only one of the many ways that in group bias, a human psychological trait, has manifested itself over human history. There is nothing unusual about such discriminatory thinking. Humans do discriminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:44 AM
1

Nationalism is the result of the human tendency to discriminate against the out group and for the in group. It is one of the many ways that this psychology has manifested in human history, and it cannot be ‘rooted out’. Many utopians have denied human nature in the past. You shouldn’t bother doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 10:39 AM
1

I can’t really argue that Australia has or had a deeply imbedded and old culture or sense of nationhood as it is, as you say, a nation of immigrants, and not very old. I will say that this is still a totally unsustainable and nihilistic way to look at a nation. In the past, Australians and their gov wanted to create an Australian ‘nation’ that was its own entity and had its own identity separate from being an Anglo colony. Your, and many many other people’s, multicultural idea about what Austral…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 09:54 AM
1

I don’t think immigrants must necessarily integrate within 20 years. Integration is obviously a spectrum so one is not simply classified as ‘integrated’ or ‘not integrated’. Consider the policy of multiculturalism, advocated for by governments, often in Europe, that have allowed mass immigration in the past and intend to allow far more in the future. This policy is a clear indication of the purpose these waves of immigration are meant to serve in the governments eyes, that is an purely economic …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 08:36 AM
1

You are a utopian. Your original point was that aggression was not and is not a useful trait to increase the amount of offspring you can keep alive, thus propagating your genetic code. I have already explained why this is false in another reply. Also, aggression is, due to this evolutionary benefit, an biologically imprinted trait in human brains (with some having it at a higher level that others).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:55 PM
1

Your original point was that the trait: aggression, was not a necessary trait for survival for this species, and that humans are not naturally aggressive. This is false, as I have already explained why aggression was and still is a key part of propagating genetics through offspring. The trait: aggression is present in human brains (certainly at differing levels in different people) due to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:52 PM
1

I don’t even think you believe the stuff you are saying right now. It looks to me like grasping at irrelevant straws to avoid conceding a point. Could you explain why fighting other species for sparse and needed resources is 1) not actually caused or related to the trait: aggression because they are not humans and 2) explain why fighting for these resources that you or your offspring will die without is “the most stupid thing you can do in that scenario”?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:46 PM
1

You are clearly oversocialised (overly assimilated into societal conventions), and cannot possibly see past Christian (for that is what our western morality is based off) morality. You are a utopian and until you get passed the mental block in your mind caused by utopian ideologies like post structuralism and other left wing ideas, you will not be able to accept that simply demanding that the species must repress its true nature is an absolutely absurd argument that is not worth a minute of cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:42 PM
–

If another creature / group of creatures threatens your ability to collect resources needed to 1) survive and 2) multiply then, if it is a worthy risk, those resources must be fought for. There must be creatures in your in group who will do this fighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:28 PM
–

It makes it inevitable and repressing what is inevitable due to a refusal to acknowledge the true nature of mankind shown by our species’ history (which is both exceedingly violent and amazingly empathetic) simply because it offends moral sensibilities and utopian social constructionism will always cause harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:25 PM
–

Aggression is as human a trait as agreeableness or being neurotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:14 PM
–

It’s painfully obvious when we are discussing inter species competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:09 PM
2

They have affirmative action in my former school in the uk, just as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:05 PM
–

Laziness means many things. What type of laziness? Laziness in terms of energy Conservation is very useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 03:13 PM
–

It means a creature will not back away from, and be willing to start, a necessary fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 03:08 PM
1

Do u actually like your wife
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:40 PM
–

It is obvious that aggression has a purpose, among many other traits, in benefitting species success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:48 PM
–

Good? It is useful. Perhaps it doesn’t lead to behaviour favoured by wishy washy moral systems but aggression can be very useful, otherwise it wouldn’t be a common trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:45 PM
–

It means that you won’t do anything of true value or impressiveness for yourself or anyone else you care about, if such a person even exists, ever again. A life goal of playing vidya is truly life denying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 11:39 AM
2

Affirmative action is exceedingly common…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 09:38 AM
–

Hmm… I think based?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 11:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter