TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhatIsTheWorldComing Archive

View 3 posts and 118 comments by WhatIsTheWorldComing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Sex is bad. Men want it. Men are bad. Women don't. Women are good.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:53 PM
1

I don't think so. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:39 PM
1

Realist. Relative. Constructivist. Rational. I'm not good with big words. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 11:14 AM
1

Ah! That is puzzling. I've no idea about that. Sorry.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:16 PM
1

I don't think AskFeminists are banning any accounts on this sub. They know most of their questions are coming from MRAs.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:37 PM
1

Thanks. I get that now.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:35 PM
1

The analogy is weak between influencing someone to feel like committing suicide and hiring a hitman to kill them. The hitman can be considered an instrument and the paymaster the agent in a way does not apply in the suicide scenario. Furthermore, the victim of hitman as no choice. A suicidist does.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:34 PM
1

Be careful for what you wish. You'll have men in jail all over the country because their wives committed suicide. I don't think anyone causes suicide except the suicidist. There may be contributing factors, but the direct cause is always the suicide himself. You want it any other way? Go kill yourself.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:34 AM
1

It's "What is the world coming to?" but I got bored after five words. Have you got any other ideas? I need a new one for AskFeminists after getting banned yesterday.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:18 AM
1

I'm against making it illegal to shame someone into suicide. Suicide is always wrong. I think the history of the Indian subcontinent is a very particular one, with an Imperial British colony both exploiting and trying to modernize a fiercely traditional and very diverse population. Some of the laws that emerged are really bad. For example, they made it a crime to offend the principles of another's religion. That was because they were dealing with sectarian strife between muslims, sikhs and hindu…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:14 AM
2

They've all fallen out with each other at some time. Camille Paglia may be worth looking at. She claims to be a feminist, but is something of a bette noir for the movement. Perhaps she's not early enough for you.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:08 AM
0

Exactly. They don't do modern individualism. Shame is borne by the group as a whole, in this case the family. She is ashamed to be part of it. This way of thinking is very strange to us. I guess the closest would be feeling ashamed because the lakers lost to celtics in the NBA finals.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:05 AM
1

In the Indian subcontinent, sometimes women are burnt alive as punishment for not providing enough dowry. There is also a tradition where women sacrifice themselves on their husbands funeral pyres as a demonstration of devotion: Sati. This, too, has been outlawed. It sometimes happens that British Pakistanis will murder their wives or daughters for bringing shame to the family. There was a recent case where a girl was murdered by her parent for "looking at" a boy. These are examples of extreme t…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:01 AM
2

Sorry. I forgot about that.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:17 PM
2

I don't disagree with this. I stopped reading after the quoted passage, and didn't read much before it either. It just caught my eye right away. So you may be right. But, on second thoughts, it can't look good when the people you are citing are themselves covering their asses. You know what i mean? I don't know. Just think you want your citations to back you up solidly, but you could be right and it may be possible to argue your position. At the very least, though, it would require a parenthetic…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:14 PM
2

Yeah. It's gone again. I have a screen cap of when it was up, if anyone's interested. I've been out ever since. Just got back in. Don't know what happened in the mean time. Their mod actually posted on the thread, but every other comment has been deleted.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:09 PM
1

That's why I asked.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:06 PM
2

Well, bless me soul and shiver me timbers, wonders will never cease. It's been UNREMOVED!!! Demmian has some shame after all.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:26 PM
26

WhatIsTheWorldComing awards top marks to this penetrating and insightful comment. Thank you, dungone.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:15 PM
18

The school moved all outdoor activities inside just to be safe.. That's pretty scarey.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:13 PM
56

They differ anatomically and in other general ways, but there is no reason to suppose that moral goodness and badness are distributed in anything other than equal measure between men and women. That is the substantial point being made by the image.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:58 PM
-1

Jeff, this business about men and women being the same is a subtle one. It's a "yes and no" type of situation. We need to make distinctions. First, you are correct. They are not the same. They differ most obviously by anatomy. They may differ in other ways too, about which we could speak truthfully, though by way of generalization. Secondly, you are wrong. They are the same as regards the equal distribution among men and women of the moral virtues: good and bad, sexism, hypocrisy, chauvinism, co…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:55 PM
11

Reminds me of Nietzschean slave morality.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:46 PM
17

Oh yes, them. I love it. I live to be downvoted by the feminist brigade. It shows I've hit a nerve.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:15 PM
2

You write: This [claims of an empidemic of false rape accusations] is not something I have seen among any MHRM sites I have read. But just today this was posted on this sub.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:00 PM
7

Who is?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:51 PM
19

Well that's enlightening. They don't waste much time, do they?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:45 PM
-3

Why not? It is a question.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:44 PM
8

That's kind of what I see in both camps.. Bullshit! I have just this moment posted a critical comment on this sub. I expect it to be downvoted, sure. But will it be removed? Not a chance in hell.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:42 PM
9

I checked one of your footnotes, the sixth. This purported to offer support for the claim that, 'According to a 1996 Department of Justice report, “in about 25% of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI, ... the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing"'. But when I got there, I read: 'Some already have used the cases discussed in this report to argue that hundreds more innocent defendants are in prison. They contend that the current "exclusion" rate for forensic DNA labs …
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:36 PM
3

That's disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:57 AM
-4

OK. Fine. Sorry.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:33 AM
1

Umm... Did we just get pounced on by the cookie monster? Should I hide under the table?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:28 AM
0

You simply do not have sex with anyone who is not consenting or unable to consent. Is it your impression that something the OP has said implies otherwise? If so, can you quote it please. I can't find it.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:24 AM
1

Wow. It worked.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:04 AM
1

Thank you , FallacyBot. Wow, there's even a bot for that! How nice of you to stop by. Wait. How does that work. Try this. What Burden of proof?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:15 AM
1

He is a feminist false knight who doesn't like how western feminists are silent about the "plight" of Arabic women, and condemns Islamic immigrants from "backward Pakistan" for their "misogyny". Very well put. I agree. But that doesn't mean he's wrong. That would be an ad hominem fallacy, would it not?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 07:07 PM
1

Well, well, well. I think we've a nail on head situation here. There's room for criticism of the style in which this guy presents his case, but it's pretty hard to fault the content. Thanks for posting. It's a keeper.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:57 AM
1

Thanks. Noted.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:16 AM
2

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:00 AM
1

I liked the facial expressions on the men mimicking the facial expressions of disappointed entitlement on women.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:37 AM
1

Now then. Now then.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:27 PM
3

Sorry. I don't follow you. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:32 PM
-1

Well hello Isabelle50, Fancy seeing you here. Yes. You can't have it both ways. That was precisely my point.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:06 PM
6

It's only aimed at men if men are the ones that do these things. You decide.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:43 PM
1

"urbane" ?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:42 PM
2

Sorry, just woke up. :/ I know the feeling. It's that "I need a cup of coffee so badly I can't even make a cup of coffee" moment. On the other point, they may not accept that feminism is irredeemable. They may say you are rather begging the question. Myself, I would really like to see feminists of all shades (and there are many) and MRAs of all shades, get together in one big bun fight without rules and have it out. But no subreddit provides for this. I assume this has been tried before. What ha…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:24 PM
3

Why are these supposed feminists here shaking their fingers at MRAs who recognize the hateful ideology behind feminism instead of casting the radical feminist who advocate mass murder out of their movement? This is a very fair question. I will put it to them next time.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:20 PM
0

Look man, have you really no sense of irony? I assume you must have. "I am a 'feminist MRA' troll" was ironic. Get it? Sorry. Anyway, on a more interesting note, without meaning to be needlessly awkward, other than taking your word for it, how can I know he no longer identifies as a feminist? I could have sworn I saw something quite recent where he said he thinks of himself as a feminist. Furthermore, while I'm talking, and I seem unable to stop, there are others, like Hoff-Sommers, and even the…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:09 PM
1

Alert. This is a post from a man-hating feminist troll. We must destroy him immediately. The cause of MensRights cannot sustain reasoned attacks. It is weak and illogical. The only thing to do is to call people who break taboos bad names. We cannot physically torture them because we don't know where they live but we can slur and slander them, demean them, challenge them with tricks of rhetoric, ad hominems, and naturalistic fallacies. Just kidding. Actually, I am a "feminist MRA" troll who is tr…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:09 PM
-4

in order to identify as a feminist you have to believe in the concept of "patriarchy" - the idea that all men oppress all women all the time. Sigh. Warren Farrell identifies as a feminist but does not believe in the concept of "patriarchy". I am a "feminist MRA" troll and I am attempting to destroy your subreddit. Nevertheless, what I said remains true. Sorry.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:56 PM
2

Branch out and educate yourself. This always come across to me as a tad arrogant. I call you a blowhard.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:01 AM
1

Yes. I have a lot of self-esteem. You should work on yours. The ladies just love it.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:00 AM
1

They haven't figured out that no one is interested in legislating them into 'attractiveness'. Worse, they think it can be done. You'd have to explain that one to me. Sorry. For one thing, "Blue Pill Omegas"?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:51 PM
1

Game used to be called 'male behaviour' I frankly doubt this because even if it is identical in all other respects the fact that it has to be institutional taught is a departure from old. In any case, even if what you say is true, it would only mean that I don't want to be a traditional male. For one thing, I want to love. Game explicitly denies love. And I'm not so sure that men never used to love. I don't think things were always so dark. Is that an empirical question? Perhaps.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:51 PM
1

Thank you. Please continue.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:44 PM
1

We could both be right. Given the way society is game could be the only option, or the best one, for individual men. At the same time, it could be the case that society places expectations on men such that game is the only or best option. We could advocate game and changing society. By the way, adding "for fuck sakes" to the end of a sentence only conveys a needless tone of anger and does nothing to persuade me you are more likely to be correct.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:22 AM
1

Don't question anything they say, when their title is AskFeminists?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:13 AM
1

I really find that astonishing. Can you say more?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:03 PM
0

Yeah, I noticed that. I just got my perfectly genuine question removed as "baiting". It's hard to know how to avoid offending these people.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:04 PM
3

So you excoriate people who get banned from AskFeminists for even trying to talk to them?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:03 PM
1

That may be, but there remains an inconsistency in the idea that a girl who can, at lest in principle, commit aggravated rape at aged 9, cannot consent to sex at 14.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:26 PM
1

I mark you up as someone capable of admitting fault. Big kudos for that. It's a rare quality. You rise sharply in my estimation. As I said before, I will go after your main argument once you state it clearly. Good night.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:21 PM
-1

All you have said is that matters are not so simple That's correct. Well done. That's all I was saying. The morality of the age of consent is not so simple as the troll originally suggested. We don't have to bang up someone who has sex with a 15 year and 364 day old person and rejoice if they have sex the following day. The matter is not so simple. The relevance of the age of consent in Spain and at other times in history for us is simply to illustrate that judgments on a reasonable age may vary…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:18 PM
-1

Uh, no, I gave you a link to a google search with copious evidence. Did you click it? Did you realize there was a link there? Would you like me to post it again? Must I select one of the many referenced resources for you? Does your mother hold you dick while you pee?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:09 PM
0

Google is your friend. If you'd taken the trouble to read carefully what I already quoted, and then googled if you disbelieved, as I have done, you could have worked all this out for yourself. If you have any arguments that need refuting could you please formulate them clearly. Pretend you are laying them out for a five-year-old, then I promise I'll have a go. As it is I just can work out what you're saying.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:03 PM
0

Can you not read? It's odd, because you seem capable of writing, though not very well.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:57 PM
0

Puberty for girls has always been a variable depending on the girl at does start at 10-12. It didn't start at 15 back then - 15 was just the age they decided the girl went through puberty enough to have babies. Err, no. The average biological age of puberty has been getting younger. Physiologists remain puzzled as to the cause.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:55 PM
3

And yet yesterday we were told a girl aged 14 can't possibly give consent. That's absurd. Which is it? Surely consent and agency are rarely all or nothing. This is relevant to MensRights because the idea that consent is black and white is used to shame and blacken men and place much of what they do on the rape continuum. Male shame is female power.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:30 PM
1

So obviously matters are not so simple.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:09 PM
2

The whole comment is revealing. "Biologically men are wired to be pigs. We're good at being pigs. I don't have a problem with being a pig to be perfectly honest with you. I know what limits are. I know what "no" means and I know what "yes" means too. So that's why we have a human species. The entire purpose of the feminine aspect of people is to civilize men." http://youtu.be/_WYfTL-FLdQ?t=3m24s First women are portrayed as a necessary constraint on the immorality of men. That sex is immoral is …
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:44 AM
1

And in today's news we have a 10 year old girl charged with aggravated rape, yet according to the consensus on this thread a 14 year old can't possibly consent.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:40 AM
1

Yes. I was thinking of againstmensrights. Sorry.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:11 AM
1

I'm lost. What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:10 AM
1

Society tells girls the same thing and that they shouldn't want it. I don't agree. Girls are not told they must initiate. If anything, they are told they must pretend not to be interested. In any case, it ought to be able to solve this question empirically by reference to documentary evidence.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:07 AM
1

Society tells boys sex is dirty and that they have to initiate it with girls or they will spend their lives alone.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:53 PM
0

Agreed. The age of consent is 13 in Spain, and was 13 in England. "England has a long history of do-gooders seeking to stamp out their version of sexual misconduct by force of the criminal law. In the eighteenth century, the quaintly named Society for the Reformation of Manners funded prosecutions of brothels, playwrights and gay men. In the 1880s, the Social Purity movement repeatedly tried to increase the age of consent for girls from 13 to 16, despite parliament’s resistance. At that time, pu…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:44 PM
1

It used to be 13 in England, too, back when the age of puberty for girls was 15. It's now 10. "England has a long history of do-gooders seeking to stamp out their version of sexual misconduct by force of the criminal law. In the eighteenth century, the quaintly named Society for the Reformation of Manners funded prosecutions of brothels, playwrights and gay men. In the 1880s, the Social Purity movement repeatedly tried to increase the age of consent for girls from 13 to 16, despite parliament’s …
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:41 PM
1

Seriously!
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:29 PM
1

Can you be little less prolix please.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:27 PM
0

What makes you think it's right? Just because the age of consent in Spain is 13 doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:25 PM
-3

Whose side are you on?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:17 PM
-6

Yep. The usual sarcastic and obnoxious trolling from GeigerWasWrong.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:55 AM
2

The thing is, no one would ever say to a women "learn Game". I think society really is messed up the way it puts expectations on men like this. That's just what makes this a mens rights issue, and your comment demonstrates it perfectly.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:43 AM
3

Ah, MensRights. No place quite like it. You, Sir, are a Troll-claimer and I claim my ten dollars.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:41 AM
7

What, you mean...man up?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:39 AM
2

"You have written too much. I must obliterate you so I don't have to not read you in future." WTF?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:38 AM
0

Can we move this somewhere else?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:28 AM
-8

Trolling again, Gieger? This is MensRights, not FeministPaedoHysteria. Obviously matters are not so simple. The age of consent in Spain is 13.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:15 AM
-6

Trolling again, Gieger? This is MensRights, not FeministPaedoHysteria. Obviously matters are not so simple. The age of consent in Spain is 13.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:01 AM
1

The way I see it the problem is not the woman but the power the legal system gives her to run people over. I mean, yes, the woman is a problem, but solve the bigger problem and the smaller one wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:41 PM
2

Thank you, Cubbance. I may haunt you forever. lol
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:59 AM
4

Quite!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:56 PM
2

"Criteria" is already plural and requires no trailing 's'. OK, shoot me. I'm the grammar nazi. Just before blowing my brains out, and for a little extra fun, could you tell me the singular of the Greek plural? I do like to keep things interesting, even with only seconds to live.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:37 PM
17

Perhaps a tad uncharitable, even in these circumstances, though I wouldn't want to say I fail to understand the sentiment.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:34 PM
1

Good answer! I like it. Thanks. Now we're tawkin'
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:45 AM
2

"It isn't. It's equally important. It's just more difficult to obtain" would be the answer.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:30 PM
2

Are there limits on how far we should go to show the police we aren't criminals?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:46 PM
1

The word "abuse" is terribly abused. I think that's his point.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:42 PM
1

Trolling again, Gieger?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:35 PM
1

all I wanted was an apology I could show to my son, so I could explain to him that while abuses like this may occur, Britons still understand that walking in the country with your son is not a suspicious activity and nor should it be treated that way. The problem is even taking a child to a public library may now be regarded as a suspicious activity.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:22 PM
1

Why should rape be different than any other crime? Well, you know the argument. It's that, uniquely, rape rarely has independent witnesses, therefore insisting on the same standard of proof makes conviction more difficult and often impossible. I wonder how we should best reply to this? Your thoughts please.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:04 PM
6

let's not pretend that it's a profound revelation. Was someone pretending?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:59 PM
2

Actually I didn't think it was terribly well written, though I agree with where he's going. Sorry.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:17 AM
1

I've often wondered about this handling business. What is it about handling that men are supposed to do it with women, but women don't have to do it with men?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:42 AM
1

Ooh. It's the last sentence I don't get.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:39 AM
5

A strong woman can handle a strong man. A weak woman accuses him of abuse.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:35 AM
1

It's true. Silence is not the same thing as consenting to sex, but it is also true, and quite compatible with this, that a person may consent to sex whilst remaining silent.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:32 PM
1

Spot on. Don't stop with those wise words.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:28 PM
1

Much as I dislike your aggressive tone, I admire your logical mind, and I'm inclined to agree with you on this. What gets me is in a relationship people can have sex every night with nary a "yeah" or a "nay" or even much in the way of a question, yet plainly there need be no question of rape. I mean, you just get to know each other. Is there something I've missed. Did just being reasonable and caring somehow become out of the question?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:24 PM
1

Oh I see. You're being sarcastic. No need for that. "What is the difference between feelings and representations?" is a question you could have asked if you had wanted to press matters further.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:15 PM
4

Enough! Consistency is logocentric and phallic.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:56 AM
2

"Nothing is real. Everything is an idea. There are no facts. Only feelings." Not quite. "Nothing is real. Everything is an idea. There are no facts. Only representations."
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:55 AM
0

Thanks for posting. I really enjoyed this and intend to watch it again and read up on this prof who was brave enough to say what many in academe must surely have known for years.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:53 AM
0

"The personal is political"
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:26 AM
2

Thanks for posting. From the abstract: "Our results indicate that women receive more lenient sentences even after controlling for circumstances such as the severity of the offense and past criminal history."
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:46 AM
3

Feminists argue that men having power fantasies is about a patriarchal desire to dominate women. That men tend to fantasize over this just shows that this is what men in general want to do. You may say we fantasize over what we don't have. Sure. That may be true. But that is not to say we can't fantasize over something we have in part but want more of. Despite the upvotes I remain to be convinced that yours is the best retort.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:11 AM
0

It's obviously been created as an HTML page. Why don't you just post the HTML page?
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter