TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhatIs_ThisFaggotry Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by WhatIs_ThisFaggotry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Holy shit there are still people here who think that story was real?
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 02:55 AM
14

The same people who give a shit about the depp-heard title fight. This place has turned into people magazine for the last few weeks.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:30 AM
20

for my first marrage. And apparently you didn't learn your lesson?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 09:42 AM
-2

Ok. Take a breath. Read what you wrote again. You quoted one sentence out of my post. See it now? Yeah, good. That's the sentence i am talking about when i say that the sentence you quoted refers to the motivations of an ex-wife for demanding alimony, not to the actual law. Got it now? Ok, so which bottom tier law school lets you graduate without basic reading comprehension skills?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 11:47 PM
1

Obviously, but need is, in fact, also a completely relative concept. In any case that sentence you quote refers to the motivations of an ex-wife for demanding alimony, not to the actual law.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 06:21 PM
-8

Yeah i wish i was as tough as you bud.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 10:00 AM
5

I never said she was abused by him. I said that testimony from someone who has something to gain from another's success or failure should not be taken at face value. And since when has the basis of need ever been relevant when it comes to women and alimony? I've seen plenty of already rich (family money) women attempt to squeeze more money out of a man that made less than them on a divorce.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 09:58 AM
-1

Sure, but the value of that alimony could be reduced, again assuming they're actually receiving it.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 09:53 AM
-7

I did. Either way the whole story sounds like bullshit and attention whoring from amber heard who's already been seeing her roles and perceived value drop for the last few years. But my background makes me look into motivations first, hence mentioning the possible motivations of the exes. I'm not surprised we have a bunch of retards here who can't read an entire paragraph before jumping to a wrong conclusion.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 09:50 AM
-42

This doesn't really tell you much. Both exes could still be receiving alimony off of him, so they would be protecting their investment regardless of what is true or isn't. Either way the whole story sounds like bullshit and attention whoring from amber heard who's already been seeing her roles and perceived value drop for the last few years.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 07:52 AM
16

Useless people not having to work. This is the main reason why i support basic income. I've wasted enough time and money in capacitation, training people who don't want to learn, interviewing people who couldn't give two shits about the work they're doing and just want a paycheck. Then there's the money wasted on careless mistakes made by employees who don't really want to be there.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 07:08 PM
3

Schooling time: Extortion requires you to attempt to obtain something from the victim in exchange for whatever the extortion consists of. At no point has op mentioned contacting the "victim" with the evidence, nor has he mentioned any intent to do so, rather he has mentioned using it to take her out, likely by reporting her to her superiors. This cannot be considered extortion.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 08:04 PM
3

Question 1: ”Are you a player?” No, I just fuck a lot. I can't get away with this one, i'd have an urge to follow that up with the next verse's line: Hey yo I'm still not a player but you still a hater
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 02:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter