TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhatWouldHitchensSay Archive

View 1 post and 210 comments by WhatWouldHitchensSay on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I agree with almost everything you wrote, but I think it's very, very early to say we're in a hard-left swing right now. Republicans control every single branch of the federal government and although socially, we'd swing pretty left if Dems win back half of one branch of the federal government, economically, the current DNC leadership is very neo-liberal, rather than "hard-left."
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:25 PM
13

I'm in a similar boat. I don't feel at home in either party. For me, I still lean voting Dem b/c, while both parties are corporate owned, the Dems at least have a few people left who remember the men who died fighting for a 5 day, 40 hour work week and basic worker protections as part of the labor movement. I just wish there was a single, realistic party I could vote for that cared more about people who make their money from a paycheck, not their inheritance. Instead I get two parties pushing po…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 08:55 PM
2

"Freedom from want" is not freedom. That is rhetorical nonsense. I'm not saying it is. The point I was making is that in liberal societies, freedom from want (having social safety nets, welfare, unemployment, etc.) is an important goal. The extent to which the government exerts control to achieve that goal determines how authoritarian that society is. The only issue at stake here is the size and scope of government. Literally nothing else matters when trying to pin down a political ideology. Bot…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:01 PM
1

Here's a word. Dictatorship. Define it for me.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:01 PM
2

Control was extremely centralized. True of any government. That's what government means. And I might add, especially in war time, like say when the Nazis are invading you. But a dictatorship is centralized to one person. Like... maybe Joseph Stalin? Is that one person? Or are you telling me that the millions of people he sent to work camps were put there by popular vote? So you're saying the USSR and Cuba were run by one person? I'm more than happy to debate that with you, but I want to make sur…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:21 PM
3

Please take a look at this chart: Yep. Looks pretty similar to the chart in my previous comment you responded to. I'll get to my problems with it at the end. The Nazis are on the bottom right. The communists are on the bottom left. But they both share the bottom (authoritarian) end of the chart. There is no such thing as a straight right v left spectrum. No argument from me. That's almost exactly what I wrote in the comment you responded to. The dichotomy is libertarian vs authoritarian. This is…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:08 PM
2

If it's so absurd, it should be very easy to rebut Actually no. As an example would you care to try to refute the statement i offered by example, namely that, bananas and bricks are "basically the same" Absurdity is often hard to rebut because it lacks enough detail to even constitute exact false statements. it's more just nonsense. I mean you could try to list a few ways that bananas and bricks are not the same I suppose but that wont really seem conclusive. After all there could be ways they a…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:32 PM
5

I apologize in advance for the snark. The Nazis weren't "ultra right". Enough with this ridiculous re-writing of history. They were national socialists. This reads like it was written by someone whose only social studies education came from listening to Rush Limbaugh. Let's see if we can't figure out who is re-writing history. Well, Nazis were the National Socialist Party... it's right there in the name. I can't deny that. So...I guess you're right. I apologize. Nazis were totally left wing. My …
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:23 PM
1

This is all off topic so I'm not going to spend a lot of time on this. Actually, it's exactly the topic. The article discusses how moral panics are excuses for authoritarianism. What form that takes and what its sources are both relevant to the discussion. So when you said: Yes scare tactics, emergencies, authoritarianism - tools of the right. As in feminism being right wing. It seemed important to point out that those are not exclusively the tools of the right (one example directly from the art…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:57 PM
2

Nonsense. Well argued. I'm convinced.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:17 PM
9

Authoritarianism isn't simply a tool of the right. Neither end of the political spectrum has sole ownership of scare tactics and moral panic. That's because political ideology isn't a line, it's a circle. Here's a handy picture. You can have ultra left authoritarian dictatorships, like the USSR, Cuba, etc. and ultra right dictatorships, Nazi Germany, Franco's Spain, etc. The issue here isn't one of left vs right. The issue is that any political or social ideology that demands total control and p…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:27 PM
91

It's not a different accusation. The imaginary guy (Haven Monahan) was the person she says orchestrated the rape in the Rolling Stone article. The Washington Post figured out within weeks that the guy Jackie accused wasn't real, but most media outlets don't bring that up because it makes it blindingly obvious the whole story is a lie.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:17 PM
0

It's not so much that they've always been like that. It's more that they've always been liberal leaning. Not in the ideological sense, but in the political sense. That is, they've supported the agenda of the liberal party in their country. The rise of Feminist propaganda on these sites in recent years, in America, at least, is due to the reliance on feminism by Democrats. Remember how liberals and Democrats looked down on idiot rednecks for voting against their own economic interests over social…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:09 AM
8

See, this is something I've been wanting to make a post about for a long time (even have a few pages of notes written up). Feminists, heck, most of society, believe that women are victims and men and powerful. Therefore, anything that empowers women or removes power from men, is a step towards equality. Most of us here have trouble realizing that. Sure, any logical interpretation of this situation leads one to conclude that this is a Title IX violation and very sexist, but most American's don't …
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:52 AM
11

Well, as despicable as it is, largely, it's to cover their own asses. As far as I know, civil suits against doctors/researchers/medical professionals for revealing paternity fraud don't have a lot of decisive case law. So, revealing paternity fraud could open them up to civil suits. It could also open them up to having their professional licences revoked for revealing confidential medical data. Also, a lot of research is done at universities, which are usually very liberal leaning. Any action th…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:11 PM
57

Of course paternity testing is illegal is social democracies. It'll be illegal soon in the US and Canada too. The rate of paternity fraud is much higher than most people realize and research into it is considered very taboo. Why is this? Imagine if tomorrow every guy raising or paying child support for a kid that wasn't his didn't have to pay anymore. Imagine if DNA proof of infidelity could be used to alter divorce settlements and alimony payments? It's not just hundreds of thousands to million…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:05 PM
8

Dubious claims about “rape culture” are an attempt to create an all-purpose scapegoat for the emotional dark side of promiscuity. This is the best I've ever heard this concept phrased. This dichotomy between sex-positive feminism and prudish, all-sex-is-rape feminism gets bridged by blaming men any time a woman has casual sex and later regrets it. That way no aspect of feminist ideology can ever be blamed for any negative consequences resulting from choices feminism encourages young women to mak…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:16 PM
11

Sulkowicz likely didn't pursue a police investigation because she feared its conclusions. Not just "likely," definitely. When you look at the facebook messages she sent him in the months after she claimed the rape happened, it's a pretty clear lie. I have trouble imagining anyone messaging their rapist to say things like, “I love you Paul. Where are you?!?!?!?!” Or, "I want to see yoyououoyou." Those messages (just a few of the many in the article) coupled with the fact that this girl is a perfo…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:11 PM
7

Legally? Yes. In practice? Not really. Most people can't really imagine that men are discriminated against in any way in our society. Everyone believes that men have all the power, so anything that discriminates against us is just seen as fairly removing our unfair power. The people who implemented this segregated gym time probably have no idea how discriminatory it is. Complaining about it is likely to get this kid branded as someone who hates women. After all, why would he want to take away sa…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:57 PM
22

That's giving her too much credit. Jonathan Mcintosh is the actual brains behind the clever scamming. He writes the scripts for the FemFreq videos, he edits them, he produces them, she just reads in front of the camera. Hell, even her speeches that she gets hired to make contain unattributed quotes that were original tweets from Mcintosh a few years back. The grand irony is that a strait while male is the brains behind a business built around hating strait while males.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:18 AM
3

Kissing? No. She was just under the legal PSI limit and he was trying to reinflate her before Roger Goodell checked.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:45 AM
2

It's the Democratic version of things like the PATRIOT Act, or "right to work." It's a name that makes you look really bad if you vote against it. And it's effective. Liz Warren beat Scott Brown largely because he didn't vote for VAWA.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:37 AM
36

Boulder attorneys who represent victims of gender violence say they feel the recent string of male students suing under Title IX, the federal gender equity law, are distracting from decades of discrimination against women. The mindset behind this kind of thinking just doesn't make any sense to me. "We should ignore current discrimination because other people were discriminated against in the past." By that logic, we should ignore feminism because it distracts from the fact that black people were…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:33 AM
1

Ah, I get what you meant now. I don't consider the men's rights movement to be defined as, "just about equality." I see it as an advocacy and awareness movement for the equal treatment of men in societies and situations where they don't currently have equality. Things like incarceration rates, suicide rates, homelessness vs funding allocations, medical research funding allocation, etc. . I think that you can be both an MRA and a Humanist/Egalitarian (whatever you want to call it). But, that they…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:22 PM
2

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lori-day/why-boys-are-failing-in-a_b_884262.html Here's a good starting point for a general overview of the issue.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:07 PM
1

Most of my experience on the topic comes from having a bunch of friends who are teachers and professors. But, here's a pretty good article on the subject. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lori-day/why-boys-are-failing-in-a_b_884262.html
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:03 PM
1

Umm...this one? Sorry, it's late and your question and/or joke is confusing me.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:48 AM
15

The things I have to keep my mouth shut about are generally in the vein of, "no, this isn't an isolated incident. Feminism isn't about equality. Modern Feminism is a terrible ideology that does way more harm than good." When it comes to individual issues, I'm articulate enough to express my opinion without triggering the Anti-Feminist alarms. I just have to handle conversations about this stuff with kid gloves. It's not so much a political issue, as it is a practical one. I stay away from offend…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:39 PM
6

As long it's called Feminism, no reboot will help. I'm never going to believe you when you tell me your social movement is about gender equality, when it's named after one gender. Having said that, this is worth watching.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:29 PM
26

The sorority protest in Charlottesville evokes the late 1960s, when women battled college administrators for social and sexual freedom. The women’s rights movement of that time helped end strict dorm curfews and curbs on interaction with men imposed to protect women’s virtue. Maybe this will help these women understand what modern feminism is really about. They aren't being punished for "being women." They're being punished for being in sororities. Non-sorority women can go to these parties with…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:26 PM
53

Especially since I'm pretty liberal and so are most of my friends. Some of my male friends realize feminism is bullshit. But some of the guys and most of the women, wives, and girlfriends in my social circle are passionately and vocally pro-feminist. I usually have to keep my mouth shut since being an MRA in the liberal north east, is like being an atheist in Alabama.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:13 PM
8

Well, he did write and vlog extensively about hating women, so he must have been an MRA, that's what they do, after all. Oh, he also wrote and vloged about hating men? Well....this is just another case of toxic masculinity leading to murder. What? He wasn't masculine by any traditional standard and complained all the time about men who where? Fine, but, um, he was a pick up artist! HA! I got you! What does that have to do with associating him with the Men's Rights movement? Ya, know .... stuff. …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:09 PM
201

Girls outperform boys in educational achievement in 70% of the countries studied by researchers regardless of the level of gender, political, economic or social equality. This is beyond laughably bad. We've fine tuned our schools and educational curricula to cater to girls. We've demonized and banned any male behavior, activity, or teaching method that might help young men engage, then pretend that massive drops in male student performance are a coincidence. The happiness, success and equality o…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:42 PM
5

It's not satire. It's what people who've operated for years in an echo chamber start to sound like. Every article I've read on that site reminds me of the insanity of my college's gender studies department. Ten years later and I still have about a dozen moments of utter disbelief and casual misandry all from from GenEd class. God, I could rant for hours about the insanity.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:16 AM
9

Also, because, while Feminists complain about being oppressed, even after achieving full equality of opportunity, here's a group consisting of millions of men who actually don't have structural or legal equality. The fact that they can still be fired because of their identity makes Feminism look ridiculous for perusing issues like Manspreading.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:11 AM
3

Having quiet a few friends who are teachers and professors, this topic comes up a ton. I don't think it's the curriculum (in terms of material chosen to be covered) or bias on the part of the teachers, per se. It's the way we view how elementary and secondary education should work, as a society. All traces of competition, self expression, independence, critical thinking, and rewards for individual efforts have been removed. In their place, we have a system where everyone can get an A if they do …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:04 AM
0

Guys, let up on the poor Feminists for a second, would you? This isn't real Feminism. This is just another isolated incident where it seems like Feminism isn't really about equality, as much as it is about hating men. Of course Feminism is good for men too. Just because there are more Isolated IncidentsTM where women claiming to be Feminists hate on men and demand less rights for them, than there are examples of Feminists caring, even a little about equality, doesn't mean a thing. I assure you, …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:46 AM
2

Next shocking headline: Water admits to unequivocally supporting wetness!
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:50 AM
10

Let me save everyone some time and get us to the inevitable conclusion of all this bullshit: Mansisting: The crime of existing while having a penis.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:45 AM
1

I can't wait until the SHEforHE campaign where we work really hard to make sure that 50% of front line combat troops, coal miners, loggers, and janitors are women. Surely it's coming any day.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:40 AM
8

The effort any ideology goes through to suppress any competing ideas or criticisms reveals how strong that ideology really is. Anyone who knows they're right, and can prove it, welcomes any and all debate. Anyone who has no confidence in their ability to compete against better ideologies resorts to using censorship.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:37 AM
2

Yeah, Dems had the Senate, technically, in the 107th b/c Jim Jeffords switched from R to I and voted with the Dem caucus. But still had several blue dogs, who got replaced next time around with actual republicans, that they had to placate. It was weird. Everyone but the DSCC knew that the blue dogs weren't winning reelection, and that manipulating the Senate agenda to appease their consultants would accomplish nothing. But they did it anyway. Democrats are just bad at politics. It's something I'…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:57 AM
3

You need to remember that on public forums, one of the best ways to discredit someone is to accuse them of trolling. It implies that their argument is so stupid, no one could actually think that. Some people may be doing this to make others ignore you. When I get accused of trolling, I point this out, then restate my case. Also, a lot of people don't give a shit about feminism or men's rights. They don't pay attention to it. But, they buy into society's narative that women, exclusively, are vict…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:27 AM
4

Wow, I'm amazed at the pure hate and misogyny in the thread. These brave warriors are valiantly spamming report buttons on Twitter and youtube. They're proudly posting hateful content on their tumblers without understanding any the inherent irony. Without concern for their own safety, they cleverly downvote any post or comment they disagree with or any that contain words they don't understand. By silencing all dissent, they're building us a better world. Their pissy whining intellectually perfec…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:15 AM
5

Gee, i think a dem congress passed all that shit. Holy shit, It was Democrats. I mean, just because the 107th Congress was Republican controlled and passed the PATRIOT Act. Just because Whitehouse council John Wu and VP Dick Cheney are the reason CIA torture was authorized by the Bush era executive branch, just because the DHS was passed by a Republican House and mostly Republican Senators, and had Tom Ridge, a Republican, as it's first head honcho, just because all TSA authority and power was e…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:14 AM
13

Yes. The political left in America passed the PATRIOT Act, secretly authorized the CIA to torture, authorized the NSA to collect data on all Americans without a warrant, crated the Department of Homeland Security, created the TSA environment we have today, decided to sell below cost military grade weapons and vehicles to local police departments, got us involved in two 3 Trillion Dollar wars, and it was liberal justices who decided that money = speech, in Citizen's United. Gosh, you're right. Th…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:11 AM
13

Of course countries ban paternity testing. If they didn't, imagine how many babies the state would be paying for. Men get roped in to paying for women's lies for 18 years, yet somehow, women are the victims in our society.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:57 AM
110

Is there a whole culture here I've just missed? Yes. Yes, there is. Many women living around military bases learn that they can get their whole lives taken care of, if they get knocked up by military men. Step one: Assure the 18 year old boy that you just want to have a "fun time," and are on the pill. Step 2: Get preggers because you lied about being on the pill, and you insisted the guy cum inside you. Step 3: The moron marries you without any kind of paternity test. You've got a guy who feels…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:31 AM
9

Because it gets them free housing, free healthcare, and a monthly stipend. As long as women are incentiveized to fake paternity and are rewarded with money when they do, it'll keep happening. But, remember, the patriarchy sets the rules so men always come out ahead...except in all the cases where they get fucked and used...but those don't count....why?..um...because those examples aren't feminist approved.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:20 AM
1

I read the comment you replied to 3 times. It still makes no sense to me.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:17 AM
0

Dude. I mean, dude. We have had our disagreements and we've butted heads in this sub. But, this post is Pure. Fucking. Awesome. There's literally nothing I disagree with. Not one thing. To me, the politically brilliant move of spending all their money on winning swing state legislatures and Governorships in 2010, defined this decade politically for Republicans. Because of the gerrymandering they pulled off that year, A Democratic majority in the house is structurally impossible until the next ce…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:03 AM
1

I think pretty much everything you listed can happen if we get a campaign finance reform amendment. The problem with unlimited money in politics is that it creates such insanely high barriers to entry for anyone who isn't a corporate whore. But, if we take the private money out of it, we have a shot at getting more candidates that care about their constituents, and aren't just running for Congress to become millionaires. And, if a candidate can't just smear his opponent into the ground by outspe…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:37 AM
2

I've become convinced that there is simply too much entrenched money power in DC The reason I say that the other issues are smoke screens, isn't that I don't think they're issues that matter. It's that I don't think they're issues that can or will be dealt with or solved in any satisfactory way. Until we can pass a constitutional amendment, overturning Citizens United and getting private money out, or mostly out of politics, things will only get slowly worse. When money is speech, then the voice…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:46 PM
1

The difference is that it's all public. They admit the biases that will be relied upon up front. When blaming men for every problem falls apart, people will work really hard to figure out what went wrong. Any option that casts women and men as equals will be shot down. Then, when the season doesn't go well, someone will get tons of upvotes by complaining that we didn't give women enough freedom. It doesn't matter if this explanation defies all states or all viewers who actually watched the games…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:14 AM
6

Frankly, I think that every issue from feminism to gay rights to men's rights to racism to Cuban relations to terrorism to religious rights is a smoke shield for corporate welfare. In a post Citizen's United world, Democrats are just using the Republican playbook. They get people to vote for them based on social issues, while fucking their voters on economic issues. To any Democrat who derided GWB being "elected" twice, you are now being manipulated the same way his supporters were. Rich people …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:55 AM
1

Does this shock anyone? Come on. This is classic feminism. Women in their 20s are children being taken advantage of by men in their 40s. They aren't old enough to make adult choices. On the other hand, men in their 20s are adults who are evil criminals if they get drunk and fuck women who are also drunk. Those men should understand that being drunk isn't an excuse for raping women who only said yes because they were drunk. And those women were rape victims because women in their 20's can't actua…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:26 AM
16

What's insane to me is that "shy, nerdy guys" is repeatedly used as an example of men being evil, but every behavior described would never, in any way, be engaged in by a shy/nerdy guy. No. A "Shy, nerdy" guy wouldn't walk up to you and grope you. He wouldn't even walk up to you and say "hi." He's SHY and NERDY. If you were, in any way, more attractive than a blow up doll, he would be terrified of you. Those of us paying attention understand what's happening. Men women consider "attractive" can …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:17 AM
1

Quality research. My study defines "rape" as anyone who would steal one of my potato chips when I wasn't looking, if they didn't think I'd catch them. Turns out 97% of men are rapists. Shocking, really. I think it's time we acted on this terrifying data. If we kill all men, I project a much lower rate of rape. So that must be the solution. We did it!
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:06 AM
6

Go topless. Yes! This is what I'm always hoping for as an answer. When people say this I ask them to go to the following two websites on their phones: GoTopless.org This webite that explains all of the benefits that are rights to women in the US and earned privileges to men, given upon signing a document that gives the government the power to pull you out of your life and send you overseas to get shot at. I then ask, which seems more oppressive: being legally barred from going topless in three s…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:49 AM
2

Yes. He is. But he's not a lawyer so doesn't understand why it's so stupid. This is a really good example of "Don't trust your wife, hire a lawyer, and trust him/her." So many men think that the women they married are the same as the women they're divorcing. No. They aren't. As a lawyer whose best friend from law school works for my city's #1 family law firm, I can say the following sentence with absolute confidence, despite how sexist it sounds: Women in divorce proceedings are, at a rate much,…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:41 AM
12

All the white knights would jump on them for even daring to harm a hair on her head. This is what is so insanely Orewllian to me. We live in a society that believes that we should treat both genders equally because they are exactly the same but that boys should never hit girls. What? How can we have equality when one gender is told never to hit the other gender while we allow the second gender to hit the first? If women can hit men, but men can't hit women, how the fuck is that equality? It's ju…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:31 AM
19

In an otherwise good article, he tap-dances around the main point of the entire situation: feminism has accomplished all of it's stated goals. That goes unremarked so often. I might be wrong, but this author seems like me 7 or 8 years ago. A liberal who hasn't quite come to terms with how much of a lie 3rd wave feminism is. He's realized it's not the answer, but hasn't yet realized it's the problem. He knows feminism isn't the answer to his problems, but he hasn't yet figured out that feminism i…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:22 AM
1

Because "women" is more accurate for all the reasons I've already given. Ok, we're just not goona agree on this. To me, none of your arguments explain why "women," is more accurate. They tell me why you think "women" is not inaccurate. I don't see anything in this comment thread explaining why "feminist," isn't better. I mean, who are these non-feminist women working to oppress men? Who is pushing for affirmative consent laws other then people who label themselves as feminists? And how does "wom…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:26 AM
1

When you assume... Yeah, that's why I said "I think." It's me stating an opinion, not making a statement of fact. Except our voice. I'm not telling you that you aren't allowed to say "women," rather than "feminists," when speaking. Nor do I think your comment shouldn't be allowed in the sub or that it should be censored. What I'm saying is that saying "feminists," in your original comment is both more accurate, and, in my opinion, less likely to be misinterpreted by neutral parties as "woman bas…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:48 PM
3

Honestly if we let women dictate what is and isn't rape let's all just form a single file line and go to jail. To me, that reads like demonizing women. I also think it would read that way to a neutral party, new to this sub. I guess this is just an honest difference of opinion. I get that generalizations are often useful in a conversation because getting bogged down and debating exactly how specific we should be, often stalls the real conversation we should be having. But, I still think, while t…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:05 PM
7

Those are whores, not feminists. If we're not going to count people who identify as feminists and have the power to make laws, as feminists, then what would you consider a feminist? Someone who says they're a feminist, but don't have any power to implement their ideas? The popular belief (not just among feminists, but among almost everybody) that rape is a thing that's mostly done by men means that men and women potentially have very different stakes in defining rape. That makes it a gendered is…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:25 PM
7

The reason I disagree with you is that there are plenty of male feminists working to take away the rights of men. Saying "women" are the problem misses the point that it's the ideology of feminism creates these problems, and that feminism has both male and female proponents. How many male Democrats voted for VAWA? What gender in the President that perpetuates the 77% myth? Hell, what gender was the teacher who got the kid to kill himself in the story we're currently discussing? Male. It's not a …
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:53 PM
1

So I read most things here with the perspective that this is a sub about men's rights and a space they should be able to talk freely. Agreed. I wouldn't be in favor of mods censoring sexist comments or gendered slurs. I think censoring something because it's offensive is idiotic. I would, however, encourage people to downvote comments like, "what a cunt!" or "never trust women," as they don't actually add anything to the discussion. Those are all vitriol and no actual content. I get that people …
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:21 PM
1

I've read that Savage piece. I'm a fan of his work. It's just so odd to me that Feminism can be so sex positive one moment, and so puritanical the next. It's impossible to escape the conclusion that women wanting sex is ok, but men wanting sex is a crime on college campuses.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:33 PM
5

To me, it seems intentional. You take surveys where you're looking for "sexual assault." You ask questions like "have you ever felt objectified at work?" or "Has your boss ever flirted with you?" or "Have you ever caught someone looking at your cleavage?" or "Has someone ever groped your butt?" And this is put down as sexual assault. Then, when the stats are discussed, the word rape is used to replace sexual assault. No one in who participated in the survey would call what happened to them, "rap…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:01 AM
4

Frankly, as long as he didn't tell people to commit violent acts, which it seems he didn't, I don't care how horrid his opinion is. It shouldn't be cause for a a criminal trial. I don't care if he said that all black people are criminals, women are all lairs, Hitler was a great guy, the Soprano's had a good ending, The Wire is overrated, or anything else that only an evil person would say. Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. If it doesn't then it serves no purpose.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:16 AM
1

Feminism has fully reached Poe's Law territory.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:05 AM
3

I have to say, it really freaked me out. After leaving religion at 13, I was pretty sure I had vetted the rest of my philosophical views pretty well. So when, at 24, I realized that women had equality, and that feminism's complaints where all bullshit attempts to make men 2nd class citizens, I was floored. I made a post about it, if you have any interest. It can be found here.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:26 AM
3

What's amazing is that the whole idea that sex must never be requested in the context of a relationship ONLY exists in this world drunk on 'rape culture.' Makes sense. That's why I asked, because when I was in college, shit was not this fucked up. And, as an adult, honest communication about every aspect of a relationship is key to success. The idea that telling a girlfriend that I'm not happy getting not getting laid for a month strait being coercion is nuts to me. These feminist post today rea…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:00 AM
13

A man is frustrated because he wants to have sex with his girlfriend. He gets shot down for weeks, and only replies with, "thats ok." One time, he gets shot down, sighs, and has, "a sad/frustrated," look on his face. She then thinks, in her fucking head that he might break up with her. He, the monster that he is, doesn't read her mind to be able to reassure her that he wont. She then tells him, ok, lets have sex. Of course she learned, "at her university," that this might be coercion, and theref…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:26 AM
3

Ladies, it's a purse, not a person. It doesn't get its own seat. #BagSpreading #YesAllPurses
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:59 AM
3

I sometimes get pushback when I say this, but I think one simple thing all MRAs can do to further the cause, is to always be clear we're talking about Feminism and not women, in general. Sure, most feminists will see that as the same thing, but to the majority of mostly neutral people, those who can be swayed to either side, coming to an MRA forum and seeing hate for women in general, proves the feminists are right when they call us misogynistic. When I see comments like, "bitches be crazy," or …
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:56 AM
40

If you're a man, you're constantly told that you need classes to learn not to rape. While being told that men can't be trusted not to rape and harass women without special education, you're told that your due process rights need to be taken away. Won't that lead to punishments for false accusations, you ask? Of course not, just trust women not to ever lie about rape. Because we all know women don't lie about rape. But, you respond, what about all these cases of false accusations I can point to? …
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:44 AM
3

When a police officer has a gun pointed at you and tells you to put your hands up, you put your fucking hands up. You do not drop one arm out of view of the officer and move it around. That said, this is the second person this cop has killed on duty. We can debate the legality of this shooting, but one thing is clear: this guy needs to be off the force. If he's so shit as deescalating a situation that he's had to kill 2 people, he should not have a badge and a gun.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:17 AM
7

There is no freedom of the language of hatred, "said Ilieva. This language is beyond the scope of freedom of expression ... " If you find yourself on the same side of a debate as ISIS, you need to step back and rethink your position.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:11 AM
5

Because he made a lady gaga parody video? I'm not seeing the connection.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:09 AM
2

The word patriarchy is like a feminist's swiss army knife. No matter what situation you're in or what the debate is about, busting out the word "patriarchy," always gets the job done.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:57 AM
1

hmm, someone downvoted you for some reason. Have an upvote. I was indeed having a giggle.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 02:28 AM
8

Twenty-fourteen has been a bad year for feminism. From the UVA rape hoax to the anti-civil rights atrocities that are “affirmative consent” laws, from the the scandalous radio silence after the Rotherham scandal, to the ever-escalating #Waronnerds (reaching peak absurdity in the controversy over Dr. Matt Taylor’s allegedly “sexist” shirt), 2014 was the year when feminism underwent a fall from grace that even John Milton would cringe to chronicle. I don't see this trend reversing. The feminists w…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:48 AM
5

Well, yeah. Limiting free speech is obviously the goal. If you have an ideology that doesn't stand up to criticism, you silence your opposition by claiming the right not to be offended. That's why terrorists kill people who offend their religion.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:49 PM
3

I think that's what makes this a clever cartoon. It's one of those that people are likely both love and hate on both sides of the issue. The author may not have even had an intended point.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:33 PM
8

I let a woman merge in front of me in traffic today and didn't get a thank you wave. This is clearly emblematic of our Matriarchal society. This traumatic event has put me into a tailspin of depression. 1 in 5 men will be cut off without a thank you wave this year. This injustice cannot stand! We need a campaign to stop this from happening. I demand my city put up signs shaming women for this behavior. #WavesSaveLives #Meninism #TrafficRape
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:29 PM
2

100% agree. I've long believed that Feminism and other SJW-y ideologies work like Cosmo or Pick up artist books. If they really helped their customers, they wouldn't have customers anymore. They need their customers to continue failing so they keep buying the product. For those who make money or get power from the feminist movement, they need the people below them to be constantly unhappy and angry. If women were happy, they would stop funding the Zoe Quinns and Anita Sarkesians of the world.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:20 PM
4

One of the reasons I stopped calling myself a Feminist is that I realized I was defending feminism the way religious people debate with atheists. I kept making the "well, that's not what feminism means to me," argument. Even though I knew fully well that people labeling themselves as a member of a religion, gives that religion's leaders more power. And, if those leaders use that power to do bad things, continuing to share their label keeps them powerful. I also noticed I was using techniques to …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:14 PM
1

I guess feeling like you're helping a cause you really believe in makes these people feel like they're actually accomplishing something. The fact that they're battling a boogeyman they've invented doesn't seem to occur to them.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:57 PM
2

I think people do shit like this for the same reason people fake death threats and hate mail. When you really hate a group of people you disagree with and they don't give you enough reason to justify that hate, you need to either hate them less or create a justification for the hate. Feminists don't want people to come into this sub and actually consider the points made here or the evidence presented that undermines their lies. To accomplish this, they can come in, make hateful posts that contri…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:45 PM
5

Isn't the UVA rape incident the one that was made up? Not just made up, but entirely made up. In a 9000 word article, there are only two verifiable facts that actually turned out to be true. The girl in question does go to UVA. And, there are fraternities at UVA. But, the media, aside from the Washington Post keeps reporting the situation as if there were a few inconsistencies, but the girl was obviously still a victim. The girl in question invented a fake boy named Haven Monahan. She created a …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:36 PM
1

Sure, they'd keep working, but how many would continue working the same job? Most people work the job that makes them the most money, not the job they most enjoy. If people had basic guaranteed income, I'd bet most people would rather go work for a charity or animal shelter than continue pushing paper or breaking their backs in a mine.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:09 PM
2

What always underscores this for me is the line to get your picture taken with Santa at my local mall. The kids are bouncing around like little assholes. The wives' faces are buried in their smartphones, surrounded by shopping bags full of shit and smiling ear to ear. But the husbands. Oh, the husbands. They all look like they're contemplating jumping over the railing and plummeting to a peaceful death. Each and every one. They look so defeated. And the married men I know personally, which is mo…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:38 PM
8

We need a twitter campaign of satirical stupid complaints. Listen up ladies. It's a purse, not a person. it doesn't get it's own seat. #WomanSpreading #YesAllPurses
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:41 AM
5

Rather than thinking of political ideology as just a left/right issue or a in a linear sense, look at it like this. Both the far right and far left get to a point where they want their ideology imposed on everyone. Since their views are so extreme, they can't just convince people to agree with them. So they turn to authoritarian strategies to impose their views on everyone. Look at far left communist dictatorships like the USSR or North Korea and compare them to far right Fascist dictatorships l…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:59 PM
1

Will they deny reality? Well, since they deny reality currently (wage gap, rape statistics), it's a safe bet they'd continue to deny reality. Is feminism like a religion? I don't think it's like a religion, I think feminism is a religion. It's similar to Soviet or North Korean communism. When an ideology or political philosophy relies on propaganda, authoritarian control, enforced ideological purity, constant repetition of lies, and denial of reality to prop itself up, then to me, it's become in…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:35 PM
2

Yeah, when the kid was found responsible, my mind was blown. The standard my university used at the time was "clear and convincing" evidence (a tougher standard than the Dept. of Education is currently pushing on colleges). There was no way this situation met that standard. None. This kid got totally fucked because the woman running the hearing (the sociology prof) intimidated everyone else into voting how she wanted. It was an INSANE miscarriage of justice. And it was all confidential. No one n…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:59 PM
2

Bingo. He's also suing the ex for causing emotional harm and slander.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:08 PM
1

That's interesting. I've never had a mixed group apply before. It's either been all men, or all women. I'll keep an eye out though.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:57 PM
2

It was a 19 year old girl, a 21 year old girl, a female librarian, a male economics prof, and was headed by a sociology prof who, in response to my gf pointing out obvious lies in the accuser's story, told my gf, "women don't lie about rape. Ever. She's just confused because of the trauma." Again, this was 2003, not the current climate of insanity on campuses.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:52 PM
13

As someone with a couple of small rental properties, I can't agree more. Men are more likely to have parties, but they fix what they break. I've never had male tenants return a a property to me in a condition that the security deposit couldn't cover. But all three times I've had female tenants, I've had to take them to small claims over the damage they left.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:24 AM
2

Is anyone surprised by this? I genuinely mean that. Who hasn't already figured out that one of the goals of many feminists is to convince everyone that being a thin, pretty woman is bad and that being attracted to thin pretty women is bad? One trend I've noticed in Feminism is the attempt to remove all responsibility from women for pretty much anything. Tell women that getting blackout drunk 3 times a week at bars and parties is dangerous? Vitim Blaming! Say that men accused of heinous crimes de…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:21 AM
11

They really should. It looked like a murder scene. The trash can was knocked over, the sinks we full of wet paper towels. A door was broken off it's hinges. the floor was covered in dirty water overflowing from the toilets. The janitor had a bucket of tampons that women had tried flushing. There were trash cans in the bathroom. All women know not to flush tampons. Why? Why have they done this? My life hasn't been the same since that day. That was also the day I went from associating "janitor" wi…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:57 AM
26

Has anyone here ever been to an outdoor music festival with separate men's and women's bathrooms? Women DESTROY their bathrooms at music festivals. The ones that have actual bathrooms, not port-o-pottys, always have to shut down the women's bathrooms a few hours in for emergency janitorial work. Pro-tip: Never look inside a women's bathroom that's been temporarily shut down. It will haunt your dreams for life.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:40 AM
3

I like that he's using a straw man to make that argument, because it's not actually an argument MRAs make. We don't use male work place stats to say that "society cares more about female workplace safety than male workplace safety." We use the statistic to demonstrate that there are areas of gender inequality in America that people who claim to stand for equality largely ignore. Other than using an MRA Straw man, the underlying argument this video makes is true. It's exactly the argument we make…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:16 AM
31

when anyone questions the fact that you continued to date your rapist for several months after he raped you. I've had front row seats to two men being expelled from their respective universities. One about a decade ago when I was in college and one last year. The first involved a bisexual girl who broke up with her gf, slept with her male best friend, stayed friends and hung out with him for just shy of two months, then got back together with her gf and accused the guy of rape after her gf found…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:51 AM
1

Nonetheless, one of the two friends said, he "didn't have any doubts" that the version she told him at the time was true. At the time, yeah. Within a few days when he realized the man she accused of rape didn't exist? Not so much, then. Phi Kappa Psi said that the man Jackie claimed had lured her to a dark room was never a member Jesus, this is some terrible fucking journalism. The people who wrote this really, reeeeeeally want people to think that the Rolling Stone article just got some of the …
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:16 AM
2

The problem is that the system has to stay this way. The working poor, the people living paycheck to paycheck, or close to it, need someone to look down on. If they realize that they're at the bottom as much as poor minorities and "criminals," they'd revolt against the system. The key is in making them think they have something to lose. When we think we have something to lose, we become scared of rocking the boat. Republicans need to generate outrage over single black moms getting a few hundred …
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:37 AM
34

I've always thought that the best way to reduce rape is to teach people, from a young age, to call the police immediately after being raped. This dramatically increases the likelihood of finding and successfully prosecuting the rapist. And, since most rapists are serial offenders, rather than one time offenders, this has a huge impact on reducing rape. This is what they told people when I was in high school. It really seems to me that some feminists, particularly those whose livelihood is based …
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:12 AM
1

I wasn't saying that I believed that homosexuality was socially constructed. I think it's fairly obvious it's biologically innate. What I was wondering was how the feminist idea that who we want to sleep with is socialized into us fit with the idea that homosexuality is biologically innate.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:49 AM
3

No, they are right wing authoritarians. I agree with the rest of your post, but I don't agree with this. I think that political spectrum looks something like this. Feminism is certainly authoritarian, but I don't think it's origins were on the right. I think it's origins were on the left and have become purely authoritarian, but still supported by the left because they don't realize feminism's real goals.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:14 AM
1

Maybe I'm totally wrong, but that seems like a word game rather than a substantive answer. Is there really a distinction between what you're attracted to sexually and what you prefer sexually? Isn't the sex you find attractive also a preference? Maybe it makes sense for gender feminists to say that biology determines what genitalia you find attractive, but nothing else. To me, it would seem like a cop out where they've drawn an arbitrary line to mark where socialization begins based on no eviden…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:05 AM
10

When the same people who chant "just listen and believe," also tell us that we have to keep the names of the accused public, it makes their goals pretty clear. This isn't about justice, as the article claims. This is about having the political and social power to destroy the life of any man you want without a trial. And you get to do it totally anonymously, so there's no chance of facing consequences if you lied. Either the names of both accuser and accused should be withheld, or both should be …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:50 PM
4

Because understanding how opposition groups feel about certain issues, what their opinions are and how those opinions are formed, helps you when debating them. Not just to convince them that they're wrong, but more importantly, to convince bystanders why you are right. I'm not saying that we should visit feminist news sources every day. just every once in a while. The annoyance you feel when visiting those subs is nothing compared to the danger of only getting your news from a single point of vi…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:16 PM
25

No kidding. One of my best friends spent 9 days in the hospital 3 years ago because he pushed a woman trying to slap him for laughing at her when she demanded he buy her a drink. She was a stranger. She walked up to us and looked at him and told him he should buy her a drink. His response was "why?" She got angry and told him that he was a short faggot and that he was lucky she was talking to him. He laughed her off and turned around to order himself another drink. No insults, no threats, just i…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:55 AM
8

9/10 of homeless are men from what i have read Actually, depending on the study, men account for somewhere between 60% to 80% of the overall homeless population. Men account for about 75% of the single homeless population. And, since men commit suicide at rates much higher than women, the percentage of men who've had their lives utterly fall apart is almost certainly higher than the raw stats indicate as men who kill themselves aren't around to be counted as homeless. Though not 90%, as you said…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 03:14 AM
10

how can you say what feminism is? By generalizing based on what I experience the movement's major leaders, initiatives, and policy goals are. Sure, this is a bit reductionist, and like all ideologies, there is diversity. But, if you're telling me that it's never ok to address issues at the group level, how does any discussion get done? how can any one person say what feminism is? How can they not? What other way do we have to understand political and social ideologies other than to look at their…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:18 AM
12

I'm complaining that Feminism is an insular echo chamber and that results in the behavior described in the OP. And I'm warning people here to be vigilant against the Men's Rights movement also becoming an echo chamber. I think understanding how those who appose you think is very useful. How can you convince someone to change their opinions, if you don't understand what those opinions are or how they were formed? How do we convince people that Feminism isn't about equality if we don't understand …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:46 AM
5

Well, yeah, it's one of those politically incorrect things that everybody knows, but no one is allowed say. Women generally want men who are richer and more powerful than them. We're allowed to acknowledge that women want "motivated," "ambitious," "career oriented" men. But when you point out that women don't get exited about motivated, ambitious, men in low paying careers, people get angry.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:27 AM
23

At least men are getting happier and women more miserable. True, but I wonder how long men will continue to be happier. Today, being a man is being criminalized on college campuses, how long until they can make that the law nation wide? It used to be, "don't get married," and you'd be fine. Now it's becoming "don't have sex with a woman, because regret = rape." Next, it'll be "don't speak to women or interact with them in any way." Being a man is becoming a crime, in and of itself.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:14 AM
3

It depends on the state and county. If a woman making 200k a year divorces a guy making 50k a year, and she gets custody of the kids, there are a variety of outcomes possible. Some places would require the man to pay child support and some wouldn't. But, most places would grant the mother primary custody, if not full custody. So even if the man ins't paying child support, his kids can be withheld from him as a weapon to make him not seek alimony. So, even if you marry a rich woman, you can end u…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:43 PM
84

This is the future. It's the inevitable result of demonizing one group and telling the other group that they are constantly under threat. If you believe you're being threatened, you react accordingly. Women who live in the echo chamber of feminism, who only consume feminist news sources, these women become convinced that most men are seconds away from attacking them. If you only get your news from feminist sources, you'd be absolutely certain that women make less money than men for the same work…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:33 PM
5

This ins't going to end until someone sues the Department of Education. They are forcing institutions that receive federal money to engage in de facto sexual discrimination. This isn't going away without a Supreme Court case. It just isn't. Popular opinion won't change on this issue b/c it's too emotionally heated. No one ever won an election by arguing for looser standards for the accused.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:05 PM
38

Mandatory Women's Studies classes. Brilliant. "We can't find jobs with our worthless Gender Studies degrees. What do we do?" "I've got it! We force taxpayers to subsidize us by making everyone take stupid classes we can teach." Anyone arguing that Feminism is "just about equality," is either lying to themselves or to you. This movement is so obviously about social, political, and economic power for those who run it. And they get that power by demonizing and criminalizing the act of being male. T…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:02 PM
6

I'm just shocked that there hasn't been a peep about the fraternities, or their members suing Erdely, Rolling Stone, or "Jackie" for libel. They were accused of having gang rape as a part of their initiation process. If they didn't rape Jackie, that's libel against every guy in that frat. I guess they could be waiting until every investigation is completed, but if I were one of those boys, I'd want to very publicly demonstrate my innocence and legally destroy those falsely accusing me. If I were…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 11:17 PM
8

On the subject of loudly defending first amendment rights, I'd argue he is a hero. On the subject of anyone criticizing Alan Dershowitz, he is an absolute ass. He made sure Finkelstein was denied tenure at his job because Finkelstein, rightly and accurately pointed out that Deshowitz plagiarized his research from another author, rather than check the actual source material.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:46 PM
8

Alan Dershowitz was born in 1938. Anyone born in a time when a little more than 1 out of every 3 members of their ethnic or religious group in the world, is being systematically exterminated in death camps...well, they get a bit paranoid at times. In a post-Holocaust world, Jews are even more on their guard against antisemitism. Sometimes this goes past the point of reason, like in this case. I don't agree with him crying antisemitism every single time anyone who isn't Jewish criticizes him, but…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:41 PM
1

This is some modern revisionist history. The fact that "socialist" is in the name doesn't actually mean Naziism or any other European, capital "F" Fascism was of the left. These were far right, religious, corporate backed organizations. Hitler rounded up socialists and members of the far left even before going after the Jews. The USSR, on the other hand was absolutely leftist. The similarity between the two governments and how oppressive they were says less about their political ideologies and m…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:12 PM
1

Ah. It was a mobile link that didn't work on my laptop. Found the interview you intended based on your explanation. And holy crap, I actually haven't seen this. Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:48 AM
1

Yup, that link just takes me to the front page of youtube. Either something is broken, or you really want me to know that youtube exists.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:33 AM
1

like Reagan said about leaving the democrat party, that we didn't leave the party. The part left us. I am a man without a party. Exactly. Some people really think freedom means freedom from want, poverty, and hardship. Some people really think freedom really means freedom to try and fail or succeed without government interference. There are legitimate moral, empirical, and practical debates to be had between these groups. But neither political party represents either group any longer. So we have…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:14 AM
3

Strap in. I have scotch, so this will not be short. The problem here is that labeling the political beliefs of one person gets tricky. Especially since conservatism and liberalism in America have changed and so have the two main parties. I've always thought the best old school explanation of liberal vs. conservative was how they defined freedom. Liberals defined is as freedom from want and conservatives defined it as freedom from government interference in your life. As the Republican party real…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:54 AM
17

This is what I hate about the far left and far right. No one is allowed to have differing opinions or make different personal choices, even if they don't affect anyone else. Anyone who needs to bully, censor, or threaten people who disagree with them is probably wrong. Remember when people could have differing political opinions without being branded socialists or nazis?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:07 AM
3

He defended the KKK in court, says that NSA spying is totally legal, says really nice things about Ted Cruz, is against removing due process rights from accused rapists, and is a huge Zionist/AIPAC guy. People get confused between about the distinction between liberal and Democrat. He doesn't agree with the Democratic party on several issues so people assume he's not a liberal. The truth is more that our party has more authoritarian on social issues and more conservative on economic ones and lib…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:32 AM
1

I do to. I've reread his books and rewatched his debates more times than I can count. Really one of the best minds of his generation. His level of moral and intellectual courage was astounding. He was also an absolute master of the English language. Both written and spoken. I doubt I'll see someone as passionate about their beliefs and as deft at defending them as him ever again. As for abortion, he was rarely asked, for various reasons, but he was unambiguous that abortion was murder.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:09 AM
7

Quality commentary. Good stuff. It's probably a little off topic for this sub to get into a political debate, but I'll say this: You got it half right. Yep, I'm a liberal. I believe in a national health care system, closing tax loopholes for companies that move American jobs overseas, that torture is wrong and ineffective, legalizing marijuana, and that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were complete and utter idiotic ideas that were obviously and predictably doomed to fail before they started. I…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:55 AM
6

Yeah, I constantly find myself wishing he were alive to share his views on how modern feminism has ramped up the crazy in the last few years. He was a perfect example of this whole conversation. He was someone who championed a cause I agreed with. I disagreed with his positions on the Iraq war and abortion, but that didn't make me like him any less. I have no problem with people who disagree with me. If everyone agreed, the world would be a pretty dull place.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:29 AM
4

This is already how the law works when the police take your car, house, money, etc. Even if you're never charged with a crime, you have to go to court to prove your property wasn't used in connection with a crime. Also, this is how we got prisons filled with low level, non-violent drug users. We made sentences harsh by telling the people that we were going after the big drug kingpins. Then we used those laws to imprison lots of young black men for smoking weed. Same with the PATRIOT Act. We insi…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:24 AM
6

Because the reason due process rights matter is more than a 20 second conversation. But, "WHY DO YOU WANT TO PROTECT RAPISTS?!?!?!?" is a very convincing 3 second argument to anyone not focusing on this, which is pretty much everyone.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:16 AM
1

I don't get all the hate for Jameis. He's a 20 year old kid. He, and everyone around him, has known since he was a freshman in highs school that he was going to be a multimillionaire and sports superstar. The way that kind of power and pressure must fuck with your head is nuts. So the kid stole some crab legs and said some dumb shit. Dude, if I had all that he gets thrown at him at 20, I seriously doubt I'd be making good decisions. Think about the dumb shit you did at 19 and 20. The main differ…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:04 AM
29

People who dislike Dershowitz because of his not-so-Feminist views on due process for those accused of rape and defense of NSA spying, seem to forget that he's a legal giant. The man is a greater legal mind than almost any lawyer you can hire to sue him and he will bury anyone who comes after him. Unless this woman has air tight evidence, she and he lawyers are fucked.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:59 AM
15

Eh, I'm pretty damn liberal. I used to work for the Democratic Party. I'm here because I know that my party is wrong on men's issues. There are three reasons it doesn't offend me that this guy takes glee in liberal infighting. First, this is not a popular movement, so anyone coming here needs skin thick enough to handle people with opposing views. Second, I get that most MRAs lean to the right of the political spectrum. And third, I take the same glee when some conservative idiot says something …
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:53 AM
1

6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled. If you showed this quote, out of context, to any SJW they would think one of them wrote it. They believe that they are striving valiantly for justice and are being denied. 10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Again, this line is for people who are sure they are right, but no one seems to agree with them. Classic victim mentality. "I'm right, but …
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:55 PM
3

I doubt victim culture is going anywhere. It'll just change shape. 2000 years ago there was a guy preaching about how great victims are: 3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4 Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled. 7 Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:12 PM
12

I think it's connected to the decline of the Church's authority in the West. As the church becomes less powerful, less relevant, and less prestigious, unhappy people need to find some other authority to tell them it'll be ok. Some people need to feel like victims. They need to be told that not achieving all of their goals isn't their fault and they're the real heroes. Other people need to alleviate the guilt they feel over being lucky, rich, and powerful. Christianity used to be where these peop…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 03:48 PM
12

People in the western world, on both the extreme left and extreme right, don't seem to understand how freedom works. If you have a free society, some people will have different opinions and make different choices than you. That's the price. You can't both be free and be safe from ever being upset by someone else.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 03:27 PM
3

Look at me everybody! I'm fighting racism, sexism, and class warfare by terrorizing people because of their race, sex, and class. I'm a hero!
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:33 PM
1

what does being white have anything to do with it? A lot of social justice warriors seem to try to placate their white guilt buy ranting about how evil rich white people are. Since they do that, it allows them to feel ok about being rich and white themselves. The pants-on-head level silliness of this situation is that the ringleader here said he vandalized the house because the frat was a bunch of rich white men who are never prosecuted for their crimes. When the cops show up to arrest him for v…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:20 PM
2

It's depressing that I meet a large portion of University folks that are just absolutely oblivious to anything outside of their strange agenda/narrative. I agree, but it's not just college campuses. It's pretty much all of American society. We don't have debates anymore. We don't discuss issues or weigh facts. Evolution, taxes, defense, sexism, racism, health care, election law. Pick a subject, take a look at the discourse surrounding it, and weep. The new form of debate we have in this ADD, 140…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:15 PM
1

Ok, going from watching the Frontline ISIS documentary to reading this article right after was fucking weird. These spoiled rich white SJWs make say the same shit as members of ISIS. They have such moral certainty in their cause that any and all behavior is justified. Yet they never consider the irony of attacking innocent people then blaming them for being attacked. It's like lacking a sense of irony is what makes crazy ideologues.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:48 PM
2

What you're looking for is this frontline documentary on the IS. Anyone who thinks that men are somehow not also victims here should watch this video and try to find any women in the dozen or so scenes where people are lined up and murdered en mass.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:10 PM
11

Is there an environment where people are free to discuss ideas without fear of being banned or something like that? Yeah. Here. My favorite thing about this sub is that when people disagree, they debate. There's no orthodox "truth" that must be adhered to. There's no banning just for disagreeing. And most of all, there's no banning if your opinion hurts someone's feelings.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:05 PM
2

Totally agree with you. The problem is that for Democrats, it's a really viable strategy these days. Republicans kicked our asses in the Bush years with ridiculously inaccurate moral panic on social issues is great at driving voter turnout up and motivating the base to volunteer and donate. Now the Dems have learned. Convincing women that they're unfairly underpaid, likely to be raped at any moment, and that they're second class citizens locked out of success by a glass ceiling, well... it's rea…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:48 PM
2

I could see this both ways. I usually think that calling it a religion is useful because it helps atheists see the comparison but it also makes religious people feel as though it's in competition with them. This is particularly true of conservative religious people who already don't like Feminism. The fact that it's attempting to be a rival religion makes it more threatening to them. On the other hand, the feminism/religion comparison does usually also disparage and criticize religion. And, thou…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:30 AM
1

Why is it that during these debates, no ever thinks to ask the most obvious question: Is it possible that women decide to stay home rather than returning to work because work fucking sucks? The vast majority of jobs in the western world are just paper-pushing, table waiting, cash register using, meaningless 9-5, soul shredding, bullshit. And generic office jobs may be the worst. Office politics, HR, having to constantly be careful what you're saying because the weirdest and most inane shit will …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:27 PM
11

"The best interests of the child." That standard is always used in cases of paternity fraud and child support. It's ok to commit fraud and convince a man that he's financially responsible for a child. If that criminal action and all the other ones outlined in the article are excusable in the "best interests of the child," then why aren't other crimes? I stole a car and robbed a bank to be able to buy baby formula. Surely it's clearly in the child's best interest not to take the money back or sen…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:53 PM
2

For anyone who didn't finish the article. Go back now and finish it. The first half is a story about the guy being accused of rape, but the second half is actually a really interesting discussion about the problems that arise from not having enough words to differentiate different kinds of sexual violence. Thanks for sharing this. Totally worth the read.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:17 PM
10

No argument that the article could have done a better job of covering this one. But she is a good example of blind ideology overcoming common sense in the Democratic party. Is her situation a fiasco? Well, the Democratic party wasted $40 Mil on a candidate who was never going to win. That money might have helped other races (or, probably not; the Democratic Party is a dumpster fire right now). Certainly not the biggest "fiasco," but I like it's inclusion on lists like this because I hope it serv…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 08:52 PM
1

No, they really legitimately thought he couldn't win because of his race. I don't know how many debates we had where they would pray for him to beat Hillary in the primaries because they were convinced that though Democratic primary voters (a very liberal subset of all Democrats) might vote for a black guy, the general electorate never would. They pointed out polling discrepancies in white rural areas where he kept under-preforming his polls as proof that people will say that they'd vote for a b…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 08:29 PM
14

They also drop the label because many of them want to stop working and raise their kids and feminism criticizes them for it. Feminism tells them they can have it all.A career and a family. If they give up on the career, they must just be lazy. But, just because many women drop the label, doesn't mean they drop the sentiment. The same women who stop calling themselves Feminists are still voting for candidates who propose anti-men legislation.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:49 PM
4

Sorry, I didn't mean the general population. I was working on Capitol Hill during Obama's first election. I lost count of the number of Republican staffers I knew who would confidently say things like, "I'm not racist, but there's no way the American People are gonna repaint the White House black. HA. Get it?" Or any one of a million Kenyan, Hussein, 'black guy begging for change,' jokes. This wasn't all Republican staffers, but it sure as hell a bunch. How many? I don't know so I'm gonna go wit…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:18 PM
11

It's not just about Feminism blocking progress on Men's Rights issues, it's about the fact that Feminism is actively working to take rights away from men. Starting with, but not limited to, the fight to deny due process to men accused of sexual assault. If you care about the ways in which men are hurt, limited, and endangered in society, fighting Feminism is a critical step in achieving equality for men.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:02 PM
3

It's not her filibuster that puts her on the list. Its the fact that Democrats thought she would make a good candidate and actually have a shot at winning over some conservative voters when her personal history reads like a checklist of everything conservative southerners hate. Feminism blinded Democrats from seeing the inevitable outcome. Not unlike how racism blinded a lot of Republicans from thinking Obama could ever become president.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:53 PM
28

As a Democrat, I think Wendy Davis absolutely belongs on the list. She is a really good example of what happens when you let ideology trump common sense. Liberals were like, "Hey, I really like her. She's a great Feminist, I'm sure everyone else will like her too." But looking at the situation without Feminism Goggles, she was a pretty shitty candidate. Democrats actually thought, somehow, that a woman with the following qualifications made a good candidate in red state, christian, family values…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:47 PM
2

OK. Deep breath. Exhale. Pause for effect. And... continue. What I'm about to write is not super polite and it could easily be interpreted as rude. I'm not going to handle this with kid gloves, but I also don't want to discourage you. But, in all honestly, this was poorly written. You make good points. You've done good research. Those aren't your issues. The writing style is. I couldn't finish that post because it seemed like some terrorists strapped a thesaurus to their chest and blew themselve…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:36 AM
12

If you believe anyone but Jackie wrote that insane email, you believe the following: Someone coincidentally registered that email address before "Jackie" ever mentioned the fake name of Haven Monihan to anyone. Someone wanted Ryan to think "Jackie" was in love with him so badly, that they scoured the web for every bullshit RomCom quote they could string together to create a creepy and passive aggressive love letter that "Jackie" could plausibly deny at the time. It's a total coincidence that Rya…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:17 AM
2

Here's a google results page of scholarly articles on your subject: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=sentencing+differences+gender&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ei=a7-XVLnIHK_HsQTNo4GoAg&ved=0CBsQgQMwAA
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:52 AM
1

This picture is obvious satire. Come on OP, how did you read this then decide to post it, without realizing it isn't serious?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:49 AM
18

Why does the hypocrisy and bias by omission go on, unremarked? Because Feminism isn't about equality. It's about women being more powerful than men. Feminism isn't a social movement, it's a religion being used as cynically by it's leaders as any other religion in history. Every time double standards like this occur, ask yourself which of these conditions does this event and it's response make more sense under? Feminism is about equality between men and women. Feminism is about securing more soci…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:42 AM
7

I see it as a double edged sword. On the sharper side it does bring a bigger light to mens issues without sounding 'whiny' due to the humorous nature. But that leads also to the MRM being taken a bit less seriously because of the humor of #meninism. Humor is a much more powerful weapon than facts, truth, logic, or evidence. If you can get people to laugh at something powerful, in this case Feminism, then you have stolen some of it's power. I'm not a big social media fan, so I have no experience …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:33 AM
2

Thanks for challenging me on that. I've never clarified it in that way before b/c I assumed that other people were making the same outspoken/silent distinction I was making in my head.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:09 AM
4

Terrible click-bait headline, but really interesting article. But it's aim is way off. It's a great point if you assume that feminism wants equality. But if you acknowledge that the real reason feminism wants to shut down any and all safe male spaces is that it reduces male power in society, then the article is frivolous. Male spaces are where men can let their guard down, speak freely, make bonds, and form friendships and business contacts. Taking all that away, while allowing women to have the…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:47 AM
5

People like Pat Robertson don't hate all atheists, just the ones who speak out about it. But they do try to cultivate an atmosphere of danger and inhumanity about all atheists generally. They want to define them as a clear "other" who is both worse than you and dangerous. Outspoken atheists get all kinds of invective thrown at them b/c they're seen to jeopardize souls and "hate god." So, to my original point, I'll grant he doesn't hate all atheists, just ones who don't stay silent. Similarly, fe…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:13 AM
3

Julia Horowitz said that she believed Jackie’s story because it “rang true,” and because Erdely’s article “struck a chord” in her. Horowitz admitted that Erdely seemed to have made factual errors, but apparently didn’t see her role—as a student journalist—as seeking the truth. Instead, as Jackie’s story collapsed, Horowitz worried about letting “fact checking define the narrative.” Wow. Everything wrong with feminism in a few short sentences. When you're that blinded by ideology, feelings determ…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:50 AM
10

Sure, it's killing marriage but, Internet Porn has also lowered cigarette use. "Proof." Research has also found that internet porn also causes people to illegally download music. After writing that out, I'v realized that bullshitting with correlated data is fun. i can see why these guys do it.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:33 AM
8

Interesting article, but the author tap dances around what I think is the more important point without making it: That modern society is telling us that we can't ever criticize or doubt women but that we need to constantly criticize men. In fact, we need special classes where we do nothing but criticize men. And we're told these classes are essential to all of our safety.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:49 AM
12

Feminism isn't a social movement, it's a religion. Not realizing that leads to a lot of the confusion people feel when talking to feminists. It's why facts don't matter in debates with them. Truth is determined by how it makes you feel, not by math, logic, or science. This is why feminists get so angry and shout people down when they disagree with them. They know they wouldn't win an honest debate, because their evidence is manufactured. Many MRAs wonder why feminists hate us with such vitriol. …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:38 AM
11

It really is. You can also substitute "feelings" for "faith." 1 in 5 feels true, so I don't need to check if it's really true. And if someone tries to prove me wrong, I accuse them of committing the sin of offending me. They can be redeemed if they convert to Feminism and say 1 in 5 Hail Marys and 77% of the Lord's Player.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:23 AM
2

Why are politicians who advocate these stupid laws never forced to explain, in detail, how their insanely vague proposals would actually work? an individual commits sexual assault if he or she does not receive explicit prior consent for each sexual act committed with another person What defines a "sex act?" If I'm having sex with a woman, is kissing her a separate sex act? I can't imagine how this would work, if so. "Would you like to have sex?" "Yes, I'm going to perform oral sex on you first, …
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:53 PM
1

Politics in this country haven't just jumped the shark, they've reached orbit. The only 3 things that come out of the House or Senate these days are: 1. Democrats yelling that 7 women are raped every second by 37 rich, white, lacrosse players. 2. Republicans yelling that the reason you're not better off is because the government takes all of your money to give to black people so they can buy villas in the south of France. 3. Bi-partisan bills that give huge companies free reign to do whatever th…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:34 PM
43

I was a feminist until I was 24. The process of leaving feminism was freakishly similar to how I left religion when I was 13. In both cases: I was utterly adamant in my belief. I felt superior to others who didn't share my belief. I was convinced that anyone who didn't share my ideology was morally bankrupt and probably dangerous. I never critically examined whether the ideology I believed in so fervently was actually true. Every piece of information that agreed with my belief was accepted as tr…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:08 PM
105

Oh, come on. Stop hating women so much. You know that girls will be girls. Sometimes they just can't control themselves. It's not a big deal. I mean, applying the same standard to women that we do to men would result in women actually being punished for breaking the law... and that would be sexist. So relax. It's not a big deal when compared to the fact that women are raped every 3 seconds by 28 Lacrosse players and they make 24 cents for every 5 million dollars men make. You're an asshole for e…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:26 AM
12

Is anyone surprised? I mean that. Anyone? Any single person? Sabrina Erdely set out on a mission to assassinate American fraternities and create a fraudulent moral panic. According to women now coming forward, she went through dozens of women claiming to have been raped across multiple Universities until she found one that fit the story she wanted to tell. She wanted a violent rape by multiple frat guys who where white, rich, and evil. "Jackie" gave her the bullshit story she spent almost a year…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:20 AM
3

What I love when these obviously bullshit stats come out is asking people if they know anyone who thinks rape is ok. I mean, if rape happens this much, someone must know someone who thinks rape is not horridly evil. Where are these people who love rape so much and why have none of us ever met them?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:09 AM
21

She Lied About Her Weight
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:05 AM
1

Eh, Not sure I agree entirely. In terms of support for unions looking at the records of Republican governors vs Democratic ones it's pretty clear the voting Dem is better for unions. The same is true for tax policy and health care and education funding. But I find that isn't enough anymore. being better than the other guys isn't nearly the same as being good. I'm just struggling with living in a country where I have no options. I haven't had great options for my entire adult life, but in a post …
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:12 PM
1

Yup, that's completely wrong. Read up on Pope Pius XII and his actions during the Holocaust. Really? I guess you're right. European fascism was never related to religion. I guess you can provide some public statement made by Pius XII that condemns European Fascists while the war is going on? In fact, Romans killed Jesus. You know, European pagans? Yeah. That was my point, and it was apparently too subtle to be understood. My point was that the history of European Christianity was also the histor…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:29 PM
1

This comment thread has gone deep enough that it's pretty much guaranteed that no one but us will see this debate. So since I'm a cantankerous son of a bitch, let's continue. No major statist ideology in the 20th century was based on any kind of religion This is what you said that drove me up a wall enough to have a debate this long. The history of 20th Century Fascism and the History of the 20th Century Catholic Church are inseparable. The interplay between these two ideologies went hand in han…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:57 PM
0

Eh... I'm not sure I agree with you. I can't name a single American politician that I actually WANT to to vote for. Sure, there are ideas and imaginary idealists I want to vote for. But no current American politician represents my actual views. This system is fucked.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:37 PM
1

No major statist ideology in the 20th century was based on any kind of religion Dude. Come on... You wrote this, and I responded by spamming links to articles about religious ties that fascist states had to the Catholic Church. Your response is disingenuous. What stance on the evidence could possibly be construed to indicate that religion didn't play a role in WWII? Both sides of the war declared that God was on their side. I'm not moving the goal posts by invoking Italian fascists as well as Ge…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:33 PM
1

You're right. Nazis never tried to redefine religion. And belt buckles that read, " God Is With Us" certainly don't indicate any sort of religious affiliation. And you're further right that Catholicism had no relation to any Nazi activities. And any programs that demonstrate the obvious link between 20th Century Fascism and the Catholic Church are clearly wrong. I apologize for my ridiculous and unsourced accusations.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:18 PM
1

Fair point, I'm talking about the west. And in that sense, the answer is: Yeah, really. It was the religion of the countries on both sides of World Wars I and II. Let's look at WWII as the most obvious example. Nazi's claimed god was on their side. proof.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 12:57 PM
7

I was writing in a spirit of jest in my post. I was blown away after reading an article by her I agreed with. I have read 3 of Anne's books and she is batshit crazy wrong about almost everything she believes. She is factually wrong about almost Every. Single. Claim. She. Makes. So, reading an article by her I agreed with blew my mind. Having said that, after looking at PJ media, it seems ridiculously right wing to me. Both in their story selection and in the way the articles are written. It's li…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 12:16 PM
35

This article was so well written and conceived. Few things have driven me as crazy in the last few years as the infiltration of atheism by feminists. Atheism was a movement where we didn't respect the bullshit from any group without rationally thinking about it. No claims were taken at face value. Then came Atheism+ (Feminism). All of the sudden we had to discuss how men were evil. We had to discuss reasons women had more informed opinions and why we needed to put an emphasis on female opinions …
/r/MensRights20/12/14 12:07 PM
9

When I think about what a liberal is, I usually think of this JFK quote: “If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", t…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:07 AM
2

As a lawyer, looking at the other cases that have been successful, he would have an open and shut case. It would be easy as hell. But, and this is a rather large BUT, he has been depressed as fuck and has given up on doing anything in the intervening years. He got fucked over so hard that his brain just doesn't register the possibility of starting over. She ruined his life so hard that he just quit. He honestly can't from new life dreams after his last one got smacked down so hard. I've talked t…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:52 AM
11

Until feminism reached this point, Ann Coulter is known for being wrong about literally everything. Go back to the Bush presidency, and she loudly defended every insane thing the administration did. I've read 3 of her books to make sure I'm not being too liberal. And Jesus Tap Dancing Christ she is Insane. Bottom line, she has made a career out of being loud, attention grabbing, and utterly factually wrong. Being on the same side as her in an argument is seriously freaking me out. I'm spending 6…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:43 AM
11

you're super relevant! Unless you express an opinion that upsets anyone, then you're weird and probably the devil.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:37 AM
3

Dude, as far as I can tell, that article was both factually wrong and politically based. Any investigation would prove that true, so point out any incident of sexism to me, and I'll work to fix it.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:01 AM
66

Dear fellow liberals, if you are a man, your rights are irrelevant. Anything women say is true. Evidence doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:56 AM
1

Well, in the end, the people in charge of Title IX are our current Supreme Court. Since 5 were appointed by Republican presidents and 4 were appointed by Democratic presidents, I'd bet you anything you'd like that this any of these cases gets settled in favor of the men. This shit just won't hold up and a 5 to 4 majority at the Supreme Court level means that feminists lose this current war.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:17 AM
2

That's a key problem. The wording of these questions would drive anyone who has worked in the survey research field, crazy. If you're a man, these studies are built to ruin your life. Many of these surveys are built around insane ideas. They include sex you regret as rape. They include sex you reconsidered the next day, as rape. They include sex you are coerced into by threats, as rape (Since you're a man, you go from victim to rapist.). They include bad sex, as rape. And they include sex you wi…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:49 AM
9

Eh. Single issue voters would be fine without Political Parties. The problem is that every election we only have 3 options: Democrats, Republicans, and apathy.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:40 AM
15

Yo, bro, stop being me. On a serious note, I've been arguing that Feminism is a religion for years. If you look at my username, I'm a big fan of Christopher Hitchens. I left Christianity because it dogmatically shut down criticism of itself and it's central claims stopped making sense to me when I was 13. My experiences with Feminism during my college years put Feminism in that same box. It's an ideology that doesn't stand up to 30 seconds of honest scrutiny and relies on silencing and shaming i…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:38 AM
20

Dude. We need a support group for liberals who are trying to deal with the Democratic party jumping the shark on gender issues.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:57 AM
5

No argument with going the trade route. None what so ever. Of my friends, only 4 of us own our own houses. Me, with a law degree, and 3 guys who went the trade route instead of college. A plummer and two mechanics. But, when I said he had to face life with just a HS diploma, I didn't just mean financially (though statistically, he's more likely to make less money, on average, without a college degree). I also meant that his life options just drastically decrease. My friend, who is the reason I'm…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:56 AM
1

President Obama announced that “an estimated one in five women has been sexually assaulted during her college years — one in five." I spent about 4 hours this afternoon trying to figure out where the fuck that stat comes from. I read through 8 studies that are often referenced (on Wikipedia and that awful 1in4 site). Jesus that they are bad. Some studies include rape during childhood and teenage years as rape of college women. Based on the terrible wording of the questions, every study I read in…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:45 AM
26

Dude, I read an Ann Coulter article today that I agreed with. ANN COULTER. Nothing makes sense anymore. I think I'm having a psychological episode.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:04 AM
6

This is going to blow up into a Title IX law suit shit storm. The fact that these rules are put in place without any sort of guidance on how to satisfy the requirements is gonna end up costing the Universities and taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, and when the dust clears, the rules will get struck down anyway. If I didn't already know that feminists don't bother considering the consequences of their terrible and illegal policy ideas, I'd be convinced that this was a plot by trial lawye…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter