TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

What_Is_X Archive

View 5 posts and 343 comments by What_Is_X on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

So if a man stripped naked in an altercation with a woman and ran at her that wouldn't be problematic? Seems legit
/r/PussyPass19/09/20 01:36 AM
3

Why do you care now whether you'll regret something on your deathbed? You'll be dead so it won't matter for long.
/r/seduction11/03/20 02:36 AM
25

Acknowledging one's error
/r/MensRights09/02/20 06:42 AM
28

Wait what this never happens
/r/MensRights09/02/20 04:33 AM
1

Yeah, all of those studies do not merely rely on anecdotes.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 10:42 PM
1

I didn't say that. Learn to read. You. Which all rely on individual responses to specific stimulus. AKA anecdotes. Also you. Learn to read, and write, and think.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:15 AM
1

Okay this is a waste of time, you're just going around in circles. Scientific studies are not merely based on anecdotes, and your biased and low sample of anecdotes is not equivalent to them. Period.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 12:44 AM
1

Trying to redefine a word in contradiction to any of its accepted definitions to suit your pre existing bias is more dumb.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 10:56 PM
1

https://www.google.com/search?q=anecdote
/r/MensRights20/12/19 09:57 AM
1

Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross sectional studies.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 06:33 AM
1

No, certainly not all studies rely on anecdotes. Nevertheless, the point stands that indeed those that do have robust and fair data collection processes so as to avoid the biases that you are absolutely not.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:23 AM
2

No number, because anecdotes are not a controlled and fair representation of the population of data. That's why we have carefully designed data collection and analysis.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 03:58 AM
5

What's the mean and standard deviation of a sample size of 1?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 11:37 PM
10

Usually it's mothers proudly exclaiming how glad they are that they mutilated their children (to get back at all the men in their life).
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:00 AM
1

If you need to trick people, you're not being authentic. You're tricking them.
/r/seduction02/06/19 01:35 AM
–

I'm more interested in mindsets and actual growth than having to trick people into believing a fraud.
/r/seduction01/06/19 03:40 AM
6

The fact that you use "tricks" at all is the point.
/r/seduction01/06/19 02:58 AM
2

Would Comic Sans have been better?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:34 PM
3

Speaking of neediness
/r/seduction06/04/19 08:57 AM
-1

No, the burden of proof is not on me to disprove that claim, it's on you to prove it, which you can't, so you just resort to pretending like unrelated statistics imply what you wish to believe to support your pre-existing misogynistic bias. I have no time for wishful thinkers who pretend to value logic without having ever studied it or understanding it.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:42 PM
0

No, I never claimed google does.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:38 PM
0

Oh, you know about every one of their experiences do you?
/r/MensRights25/12/18 10:19 PM
-1

That's not actually necessary since you haven't substantiated your point (that women are incapable or less capable of being professional chefs) at all; but here's just one extremely obvious conflationary factor: the desire to have children and therefore not work continuously as is required for top level professionals in any field.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 03:58 AM
-2

What facts are "on your side"? The ones that you wishfully think are so? You're utterly deluded and not conscious enough to realise it.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:51 PM
1

Not necessarily (see: weightlifting) but in this case, demonstrably yes. The my-soggy-knee thing demonstrates a childlike autism.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:49 PM
-4

You seem to be desperately trying to assert that statistics of representation are evidence of capability. That doesn't follow, and requires multiple logical fallacies to leap to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:46 AM
-5

Yeah so this is the difference between concern for men's rights and misogyny. You're not doing anyone here any favours, including yourself.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:39 AM
8

Well he has a partner who by evidence of choosing to stay together respects him for not supplicating like a bitch
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:26 AM
0

You don't seem to understand how the English language works. I won't waste my time any further, my prior comments suffice.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:39 AM
1

Why would a term describing one form of discrimination need to encompass others? Your premise is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 12:18 AM
1

Or maybe it's descriptive of a type of negative behaviour that many men employ to their own detriment. But of course men are perfect just like women huh
/r/MensRights21/11/18 09:29 PM
0

I'm sure you're enlightened by your own intelligence.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 09:42 AM
1

Wow what a convincing argument
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:25 PM
1

"This subreddit has been redpilled hard and you'll be down voted to hell for being soft or a feminist apologist or whatever."
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:09 AM
0

Nobody said anything pro feminist in this thread. Thanks for proving my point though.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:18 PM
1

Uhuh
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:17 PM
24

This subreddit has been redpilled hard and you'll be down voted to hell for being soft or a feminist apologist or whatever.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:40 AM
58

Trump: "it's good to drink water" People for some weird reason: "I REFUSE TO DRINK WATER NOW, FUCK TRUMP"
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:03 AM
1

I've seen naked Germans in the centre of cities.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:38 PM
4

Germany
/r/MensRights15/10/18 12:50 PM
2

.... Why?
/r/MensRights15/10/18 12:49 PM
1

Of course you can, but you would be idiotic to as the other party is perfectly entitled and very likely to win, suing you for defamation.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 02:47 AM
1

Who the hell said it couldn't be investigated? The fact that rapists would appreciate a higher standard of evidence is irrelevant, and the implication that we should just do whatever hypothetical rapists don't want is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 01:43 AM
-1

So what? We should just believe the supposed victim and imprison people based on nothing more than allegation? Guilty until proven innocent?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:31 AM
2

...you're telling someone who can't think of what to say to say a bunch of things? A blank mind means none of those questions will arise.
/r/seduction29/09/18 02:14 AM
7

I am whatever gender I say I am, apparently.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:39 AM
1

and behave like a triggered 5 year old who dropped her candy in the mud You've lost me and wasted your time writing the rest. Go fuck yourself cunt.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:02 AM
0

...exactly
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:41 PM
-12

That generous interpretation doesn't seem to be applied (correctly in my view) the other way around, for example when Sarah Hanson-Young recently claimed that "men need to stop being pigs and rapists".
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:40 PM
-18

Really, all women?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:18 PM
1

Incorrect. Mammary glands produce milk and nipples deliver it. The rest of the breast is completely superfluous to that task, otherwise women with A-cup breasts would produce less milk than women with B-cup breasts and so on. No other great ape has overdeveloped breast tissue like humans do. The reason we do is because humans find them sexually attractive. It's retarded that you still think that any of this is relevant. It isn't. Necks, breasts, thighs and feet are all non-sexual parts of the bo…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:50 AM
1

No I didn't, stop lying you failed abortion. You are so dumb that your existence is a crime against humanity and you should be executed. Udders and breasts serve the EXACT same function of feeding the young. Neither have anything to do with sexual reproduction. Both of those sentences are 100% FACT, do not deny it. The differences you raised - that they are located on different parts of the body, and generally exist in quantities of 1 instead of 2, are IRRELEVANT to the preceding claim. Do you a…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:45 AM
1

*Specifically* how the fuck are those characteristics relevant to the present discussion you complete piece of shit? This is the problem with you idiots - you are mentally incapable of thinking in any level of nuance with your IQ of 80 at best, so the best you can do is say "HURR THIS THING IS DIFFERENT THAN THAT THING!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH ITS DIFFERETN! ITS TOTALLY DIFFERENT". Yeah, it's different. In a completely irrelevant way. What is the *relevance* you DUMB CUNT
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:34 AM
1

Your retarded attempt at "understanding" is to assert that udders are totally not the same as breasts because they have different numbers of nipples. You are an utter fuckwit.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:26 AM
1

Fuck off you dumb cunt. You are not capable of thinking on my level, quit pretending.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:25 AM
0

What does that even mean? Are you even capable of constructing cogent sentences that follow from preceding statements?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:38 AM
1

No, I weep internally for humanity when people have no comprehension of logic and no ability to think for themselves. You will never change because you're not capable of it.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:24 AM
1

Wow you are literally incapable of intelligent thought. You are a shitstain smeared across the face of society, do the human race a favour and kill yourself
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:50 AM
1

Women do not have orgasms when feeding their babies you complete creepy incel fuckwit. The biological function of feeding babies is unrelated to the sexual pleasure of having them stimulated by a partner, and feeding babies is OBVIOUSLY completely unrelated to the act of conceiving a baby. You are literally too stupid to have a discussion with. Cow udders are literally breasts used to feed calves you dumb cunt.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:40 AM
2

If you can't distinguish between feeding babies and pounding vag, you're probably mentally retarded. Is a milk bottle a sex toy? Do you think women have orgasms when feeding their babies with their sexual breasts? Also, are you unaware of cows having fucking udders?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:19 AM
1

Breasts aren't associated with sexual reproduction at all. They feed babies after they're born, what does that have to do with sex?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:07 AM
1

Neither do nerves on beasts make them a sex organ you retard. Your nipples are quite sensitive too - are they a sex organ?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:26 PM
0

Yes they are as a matter of biological fact. Necks and feet have more nerve endings than breasts you incel.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:09 PM
0

Right, so you admit that there's nothing wrong with bare necks and feet, yet you think nipples are a no-no. Retard.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:03 PM
0

Doesn't seem to matter for people ego wear full face helmets. Are necks and feet essential for communication too? Retard?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 10:24 PM
1

Now we're getting erotic
/r/MensRights06/09/18 10:23 PM
-1

Your lips don't need to be visible in order for you to communicate, obviously. Pls respond
/r/MensRights06/09/18 11:43 AM
-1

How is that relevant lmfao
/r/MensRights06/09/18 10:49 AM
1

What about their neck?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 08:37 AM
0

Your lips are sexual too but it's very frowned upon to cover them up.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 08:35 AM
11

I work in STEM (along with women I might add) and it's anything but a grind. Every day is different and I love it. Women are not somehow incapable of doing my job as a consequence of lacking a Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:33 AM
18

Apparently even baby males are objects
/r/MensRights29/07/18 12:21 PM
5

Hitler breathed air, so you should disassociate yourself from that. Logic.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:47 AM
4

Describing disgusting women as such isn't misogynistic.
/r/seduction29/04/18 12:22 AM
29

I guess airwomen are wide open huh
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:47 AM
1

Descartes was deluded into believing there are absolute axioms upon which a solid system can be assembled though. There aren't any at all.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:30 AM
–

No. It won't.
/r/seduction03/04/18 12:13 PM
3

So I can murder someone one time and be like "sorry about that, I lost my mind. I'm actually a devout Christian, praise Yeshua"?
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:51 PM
3

This response comes from a place of neediness. The relationship should be doomed - it's toxic! Why would OP not want it to be doomed?
/r/seduction25/03/18 11:33 AM
3

Well, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:53 AM
0

I guess your mother never loved you
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:53 PM
0

being too mentally retarded to come up with new shit I guess your mum dropped you on your head you dumb cunt
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:09 PM
1

I'm quite aware my profile is public :) I just think it's pathetically sad when people actually spend their time checking my (exhaustingly extensive) past commenting history. Do you actually enjoy that? Weird.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:38 AM
1

Don't pretend like what you're saying has any coherence. Speaking of disingenuous comments...
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:37 AM
1

It's impressive that you can manage to write a comment that does not respond to its parent in any way.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:15 AM
1

If you'd bothered to take your creepy and sad stalking a bit further, you might discover that I've been an active submitting member for over 5 years. So take your insinuated conspiracy theory as to my beliefs and shove them right up your ass.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:14 AM
1

Perhaps it does; the word in contention is "emotional".
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:11 AM
1

Yes, I've clearly explained why it's the truth. Every apparently opposing comment simply goes off on a tangent while pretending like they're addressing the point. It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:16 AM
0

Point me to where I claimed that feminists have done no wrong. I'll wait. No of course you can't, because you're a filthy liar.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:15 AM
1

U wot m8
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:14 AM
1

Got proof? Of course not, you're just religiously believing whatever you want to be true.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:54 AM
1

Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing. I've had over 50 replies, most of them highly aggressive, heedlessly toxic and pointless. I've explained why the common misunderstanding of the term here is wrong, and the vast majority of people get it, but some are deliberately stubborn and closed minded.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:54 AM
1

You managed to write a lengthy comment that conveniently ignored the point entirely. Can you admit that you are the one projecting horse insinuations onto the term, or are you going to continue insisting that it's inherent to the term?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:36 AM
1

There's no way you can deny that calling men weak pussies for talking about issues or going to therapies is toxic, yet here we are.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:33 AM
1

If someone thought that all masculinity was toxic, then they wouldn't use the term "toxic masculinity", since the term itself implies that there is a non-toxic masculinity. They would simply use the word "masculinity" and confidently assert that it is all toxic. This is literally just basic grammar.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:31 AM
1

Many of the extreme responses to me in this thread have explained to me why extreme feminists exist.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:21 AM
1

Oh yeah, you totally weren't implying that feminists are voting on things they "shouldn't be". Bazinga!
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:20 AM
1

Obviously false claims don't get upvoted to the top in this subreddit. Maybe you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:44 AM
1

I never said anything about it being easily changed, so that's not a misunderstanding at all. I've been told by a number of apparently masculine tough cunts that women can't assault or abuse or rape men, and had my life threatened as a result of talking about it. I've been assaulted by yet another masculine caveman/animal, and been told to suck it up, that I deserved it and been threatened into submission to not report it by my masculine father. Does any of that "tough masculine" behaviour sound…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:43 AM
0

I was going to respond but you seem determined to be victimised by feminists, so I won't bother.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:38 AM
1

No, it's not an ad hominem at all, it's an observation. You are taking a term that does not in itself have any agenda at all, then projecting your inference about it and claiming that the users of the term intend for those implications to be implied. No, you did that yourself. Why? Well the only explanation that occurs to me is that you want it to be the case because you enjoy being a victim. I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:20 AM
0

The voting population I'm referring to is the membership of this subreddit, which does in fact agree with me. It's impressive that you're stupid enough to deny numerical fact right in front of you. Thanks for proving my point about toxic masculinity though. I bet you think you're way more masculine than me, you repulsive caveman. /r/theredpill is that way, you will find a crew of lonely virgins to console and agree with you.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:14 AM
0

Perhaps you're inferring whatever meaning maximises your self-victimisation.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:39 AM
0

It's not ambiguous or useless at all. You're tilting at shadows. The term is used to point out that some aspects of masculine social conditioning are toxic, and that therefore we should stop perpetuating them. It's sad that many members of this community feel attacked by that and lash out at anything that suggests their behaviours are anything less than categorically perfect.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:33 AM
1

Thank you for your well reasoned and convincing argument.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:25 AM
0

Well unless you can propose a better term, avoiding talking about the issues for fear of using an "unacceptable term" is ignorant - deliberately?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:25 AM
0

Next try to understand that men are not broken Where did I say that men are broken, and what does that even mean? It’s perfectly fine for men to do things differently and experience things differently than do women. Stating the obvious. I understand this may be very difficult to accept if you view men through a feminist lens, with hatred and contempt. Now you're just making stuff up.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:24 AM
3

I agree.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:22 AM
1

Yes, I think it is normal for men to think for themselves and develop nuanced views instead of blindly clinging to some extremist "men are perfect and feminists are all bad" dogma. Just because people disagree with you doesn't mean we're all "da evil feminist!!!!1111111"
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:20 AM
1

Well yes, are you pretending like men are flawless beings and masculine culture does not have any toxic behaviours?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:19 AM
1

What does "false confidence" imply about confidence?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:13 AM
1

Does the popular pickup term "false confidence" imply that all confidence is false? Ding ding.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:11 AM
1

Sure, there are toxic aspects in every culture/group.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:01 AM
1

No, none of those people are feminists. Believe it or not, some of us are capable of thinking for ourselves to adopt nuanced opinions instead of clinging blindly to dumb fuck group think from one "side" or the other.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:58 PM
4

Yes, you just don't understand what vulnerability is. That scenario you described is not an example of it. Read Models if you want to understand.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:16 PM
1

Do you enjoy making up random accusations about people and pretending like they're definitely, like totally true, bruhh
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:09 PM
7

That has nothing to do with what I just said.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:08 PM
7

What makes you think I'm a feminist? Wishful thinking?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:07 PM
1

Don't pretend to know who I am, you slimy liar.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:06 PM
9

I don't know how you suppose you can avoid being emotional. You're human, you have emotions.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:33 AM
0

Of course you deal with your problems by creating false dichotomies, making up "us vs them" fantasies where you're conveniently cast as the flawless and righteous hero and anyone you disagree with is "evil" lmao. Move out of your mum's basement and grow up dude. Your desperately aggressive comments don't perturb me in the slightest.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:32 AM
9

Where did I say you should "dump all your problems onto women" and not deal with them? Nowhere. I stated (reiterated what Mark Manson popularised, really) that showing vulnerability is attractive to women. Deny it all you like, it's a fact.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:28 AM
-4

You have some serious issues to deal with. I get the feeling you won't, though.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:26 AM
40

I agree with all of this. There is a difference between suppressing emotions out of socially conditioned emasculation fear, and a rational choice to deal with (rather than suppress) emotions as you see fit - which, as you mentioned, may include expressing them to a father or whoever.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:21 AM
-8

One of the biggest reasons men kill themselves is because the toxic masculinity you think is such a great idea prevents them from opening up and dealing with their problems. You ridiculous hypocrite.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:17 AM
8

It's not just "how they are", it's pure social conditioning. Most men choose not to express their problems because they're afraid of being perceived as unmanly, and turn to alcohol or kill themselves as a direct and undeniable result.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:16 AM
14

"toxic masculinity" does not imply that all masculinity is toxic any more than "false confidence" implies that all confidence is false. It specifically refers to a part, not as a descriptor of the whole.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:14 AM
10

It's funny because you do understand part of the truth (confidence being attractive) but have the rest of it completely backwards. You couldn't be more wrong. Women do not find your fake facade of silent problem repression attractive, they see it (correctly) as weak because you're afraid of being perceived as such. Truly confident men are not afraid of and do not shy away from acknowledging and discussing problems to solve them. Vulnerability isn't unattractive, it's highly attractive because it…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:11 AM
3

That simply isn't true. Many popular figures such as Tony Robbins and Joe Rogan, as well as basically all dating gurus like Mark Manson are outspoken about the positives of real masculinity such as true confidence.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:04 AM
-9

I'm inclined to think that whoever resorts to ad hominem attacks in a discussion does so when they lose and are too weak to admit it. The voting population here seems to agree with me.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:59 AM
16

There's nothing "weak" about opening up. It is ironically weaker for you to suppress your emotions for fear of being vulnerable.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:56 AM
53

No, repressing issues isn't healthy at all, it's toxic and should not be supported. There's nothing un-manly about getting therapy or being vulnerable, talking about issues.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:30 AM
12

That's a baseless assertion, so yeah cool I guess.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:28 AM
1484

This seems to be a misunderstanding of the term. I haven't seen anyone referring to all masculinity as inherently toxic (although I'm sure someone will now link an example). The term refers to a toxic subset of masculine behaviours, such as being "tough" and not talking about issues.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 07:39 AM
11

Have you ever wondered why internet marketers write sentences as if they're paragraphs? No really, have you? I'm willing to bet you $5 you haven't. No kidding, I have $5 in my pocket right now, because I'm a baller. Just join my affiliate marketing webinar to find out how you too can become richer than your wildest dreams and attract literally unlimited pussy. But wait! Just sign up to my mailing list to get a free exclusive 15 minute video guide on how to rent a lambo and pretend to be successf…
/r/seduction05/03/18 12:06 PM
40

Funnily enough, it wouldn't be considered funny at all if a man tweeted "let's band together to kill all women".
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:46 AM
5

Many people can get therapy for free through their employer.
/r/seduction29/11/17 09:41 PM
-3

Louis CK
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:55 AM
6

r/seduction describes a sub that " just helps guys with picking up girls and self acceptance". TRP is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 01:01 PM
3

I would prefer to be autistic instead of crazy tbh.
/r/seduction13/08/17 03:51 AM
7

Yeah, you're fucking nuts.
/r/seduction12/08/17 11:47 PM
5

There's more self improvement value than the superficial strength gains.
/r/seduction04/06/17 12:01 AM
4

...why not both?
/r/seduction07/04/17 09:58 AM
1

That statement is as true as you believe it to be.
/r/seduction05/04/17 11:15 PM
7

Well, if you say so.
/r/seduction05/04/17 10:22 PM
1

I was referring to the genders being swapped.
/r/seduction26/03/17 12:08 AM
1

Yeah ok, give that a shot and see how quickly they call the cops
/r/seduction25/03/17 10:18 PM
1

I think I've matched with more male fake accounts than actual females...
/r/seduction28/02/17 09:15 PM
2

That comment is pretty cringe tbh, but if it works...
/r/seduction28/02/17 09:12 PM
3

"Make every sentence a new paragraph to really deepen the atmosphere on this one"
/r/seduction26/02/17 10:24 AM
3

Ok, this is why you aren't being taken fully seriously.
/r/seduction23/01/17 09:00 PM
3

There's clearly good principles in here for everyone, but if we're being honest, it also clearly favours the physically attractive more than other pickup principles. The most mindful, present, high-value fat middle aged balding man will not get women chasing after him and asking him out, or "accidentally" bumping into him. So this is directly useful for a certain subset of men, but others are going to need something different.
/r/seduction23/01/17 11:46 AM
1

Reputation for being a PIMP
/r/seduction23/01/17 08:49 AM
1

I recommend reading Models by Mark Manson. Authentic, honest, true confidence is always better than false confidence, putting on an act or using some kind of tactic to trick people.
/r/seduction03/01/17 01:24 AM
1

Ok, you're limiting yourself with beliefs like that. Everybody here transforms themselves into better people. You are not somehow uniquely incapable of changing.
/r/seduction01/01/17 05:44 AM
17

How tf did you find success on tinder?
/r/seduction01/01/17 12:17 AM
1

What makes you think you're stuck? Nothing in your psychology is immutable. If you adopt a fixed mindset, it will be true. If you adopt a growth mindset, that will be true.
/r/seduction01/01/17 12:10 AM
1

Sure, but I don't know why anyone would want to stay low value.
/r/seduction31/12/16 03:25 PM
1

Do you think there might be something of value for the girl in getting to know a high quality guy and have an enjoyable time? If not, why?
/r/seduction30/12/16 11:13 PM
3

Speak for yourself.
/r/seduction29/12/16 01:05 AM
0

If it is, then literally nothing changes. So who gives a fuck?
/r/seduction27/12/16 11:47 AM
5

Potentially pregnancy and an std from that Austrian girl he barebacked lmao
/r/seduction27/12/16 11:14 AM
1

That's a personal choice, not a matter of chance.
/r/seduction26/12/16 09:39 PM
1

Bro... It sounds like you need to meditate more.
/r/seduction24/12/16 01:12 PM
1

What do you prefer over clubs? Day game, or just other venues?
/r/seduction06/12/16 11:55 AM
2

If you think you can't change, well, you're right.
/r/seduction16/10/16 10:43 AM
7

Stop looking externally and face yourself. You already know the answers to the questions you're asking, it's just uncomfortable to follow through.
/r/seduction16/10/16 10:43 AM
1

Adopt a growth mindset rather than a fixed mindset, and focus more on the learning process on a meta level rather than the superficial content you're actually learning.
/r/seduction30/09/16 05:09 AM
11

You don't, you just need to learn how to learn efficiently.
/r/seduction29/09/16 09:33 AM
1

Sure, it's very uncommon, but that doesn't imply it's wrong or impossible in any sense. Long term relationships take long term sustained effort to compensate for natural change, whereas most people want what's quick and easy.
/r/seduction27/09/16 04:30 PM
1

Really, you don't think anyone can have meaningful relationships for decades?
/r/seduction27/09/16 03:38 PM
0

That question offers nothing to the recipient. It's not interesting, so why would they invest in a meaningful response?
/r/seduction21/09/16 10:19 AM
7

I can think of a lot of international figures who are hated more than an obscure internet pickup artist who had a minute of media infamy
/r/seduction11/09/16 11:21 AM
2

You should have seen the outrage on Australian social media. A minister specifically denied him a visa because of it.
/r/seduction11/09/16 11:20 AM
2

Ok, well you know what they say about self limiting beliefs.
/r/seduction27/08/16 04:35 PM
4

Are you seriously saying you can't change your brain?
/r/seduction27/08/16 04:07 PM
4

Classifying your whole brain as "negative" is a really good method of ensuring it stays that way.
/r/seduction27/08/16 03:37 PM
2

If you aren't socially compatible with women, yeah.
/r/seduction14/07/16 07:03 PM
2

Asian girls date white guys almost more commonly than Asian guys.
/r/seduction13/07/16 11:09 AM
-1

What evidence do you have that chiropractics can change the angle of your spine?
/r/seduction12/02/16 01:21 AM
7

A vague idea that things in life can be separated into 80% and 20% components. For example 80% of results come from 20% of effort, while the remaining 20% of results come from 80% of effort. This is hailed as a universal truth.
/r/seduction31/01/16 09:16 PM
3

I am a man of conviction
/r/seduction25/01/16 11:02 PM
7

Correctly fitted condoms do periodically break. There is absolutely no method of achieving 100% prevention.
/r/seduction27/12/15 12:45 AM
5

Condoms do break periodically.
/r/seduction26/12/15 11:21 PM
6

"family values" such as casual sex lmao
/r/seduction18/10/15 03:25 AM
5

Depends whether you want chlamydia or not
/r/seduction14/06/15 11:19 AM
2

Well you did, you said "There is no opinion of his that I can apply in any positive way" You're engaging in the genetic fallacy, which is an ironic example of faulty logic. Being a psychopath has nothing to do with the veracity of claims about unrelated issues.
/r/seduction13/04/15 07:39 AM
5

What if a rapist suggests that you should eat healthy and lift weights?
/r/seduction13/04/15 05:39 AM
2

Why would you close your mind to all advice someone has to give, just because you disagree with one thing they did?
/r/seduction13/04/15 04:31 AM
1

d33p
/r/seduction24/01/15 10:02 PM
2

No it isn't. This is vapid.
/r/seduction24/01/15 07:48 AM
1

That's right, it takes practice.
/r/seduction17/01/15 06:54 AM
1

Correct, but I wish I'd never bothered considering the time investment required to reach that 1 success. That time would have been far better invested in other areas.
/r/seduction27/12/14 05:16 AM
1

Sometimes it is 0. I've had literally 1 success this entire year.
/r/seduction25/12/14 09:16 AM
1

This. A good cure is to use internet dating Which has an even lower success rate.
/r/seduction25/12/14 05:50 AM
2

Yeah, girls would never do that to guys.
/r/seduction18/10/14 10:20 AM
14

This is how you fail the shit test.
/r/seduction04/10/14 09:31 PM
-4

Do you really want to be with a girl who plays immature games and keeps "testing" you?
/r/seduction01/09/14 08:48 PM
1

Which is correct and congruent, if you are honest.
/r/seduction31/08/14 11:14 PM
2

Well yeah, the alternative "pretend to be an alpha male to manipulate women into having sex with you" style is the stereotypical pick up artist thing.
/r/seduction31/08/14 09:09 PM
3

The Mark Manson approach. The fundamental principle in my opinion is to focus on improving yourself. Girls can come along for the ride, or not.
/r/seduction26/08/14 09:46 PM
7

How it's apparently compulsory to drink alcohol, learn another language, just be attractive, and have a multitude of girls approaching you just because you go to the gym. 10/10 blogspam.
/r/seduction26/08/14 08:32 PM
5

There is no way that you can't spare half an hour or an hour every 2 days to go to the gym. No excuses.
/r/seduction26/08/14 08:29 PM
2

Be, don't do.
/r/seduction20/07/14 11:10 PM
6

Women (and men) have always and will always be geared for value. Attraction arises between people who see significant value in each other. Money doesn't matter and is just an excuse for not offering actual value.
/r/seduction13/07/14 10:54 PM
10

Not like that
/r/seduction12/07/14 09:17 PM
1

Good habits, yes, not "perfect practice", which is what I was actually discussing. Shifting the goal posts.
/r/seduction12/07/14 08:30 AM
1

It's not just about making a habit, it's also about actually making progress. That only occurs by being wrong, making mistakes, and learning from them. No one is immediately perfect at any skill.
/r/seduction12/07/14 12:49 AM
1

Yep, imperfect practice certainly does make perfect - but if and only if you learn from your mistakes.
/r/seduction11/07/14 09:34 PM
2

I tried
/r/seduction15/06/14 08:04 PM
25

Try a school? (please don't put me on a list)
/r/seduction15/06/14 04:45 AM
2

Your thoughts, intentions and actions (including words) have to be aligned to have true confidence.
/r/seduction15/06/14 04:35 AM
1

No, it isn't necessary. The RSD approach is to make your intentions obvious by your body language and manner of speech.
/r/seduction09/05/14 09:47 AM
3

Tyler is the greatest master I look up to, but that's pretty common/fundamental advice tbh
/r/seduction04/04/14 10:15 AM
13

Being dependent on validation is a limiting belief.
/r/seduction04/04/14 09:23 AM
1

confusing to me why a woman doesn't seem to want me It's just because you're not trying enough. If you can find a way to get over your approach anxiety, and you approach enough women, you are guaranteed to find success.
/r/seduction28/03/14 09:48 AM
1

Do you actually believe that fraud?
/r/seduction27/03/14 09:44 PM
0

How does that imply in any way that drugs are unnecessary?
/r/seduction21/03/14 10:10 PM
2

I didn't disagree with any of that. I am, in fact, what most people would consider a "health nut". The contention is with your assertion that eating, exercising and sleeping well results in "no need for the FDA". That is a childish, and blatantly incorrect assertion as a matter of basic fact. You can eat, exercise and sleep as well as you possibly can, but at some point in your life, you are going to face a serious illness (or many) that can only be treated with drugs (assuming you don't get kil…
/r/seduction21/03/14 10:10 PM
1

There would be no need for the FDA if everyone was walking, exercising, walk, eat reeeeeeeaal food, drink water, and sleep. Really, eating "real" food, drinking water and sleeping protects you from cancer and heart disease forever and makes you immortal? TIL.
/r/seduction21/03/14 10:13 AM
10

What kind of pussy cares about other people's feelings and mindstates right?
/r/seduction11/03/14 08:38 PM
-2

No, it doesn't fucking matter. "Hi, I'm Kensei, what is your name?" is as complicated as it needs to be.
/r/seduction11/03/14 08:37 PM
1

It makes people feel like they've accomplished something by classifying women as objects. "Oh, she's a HB9? Just like those other ones then, this will be easy".
/r/seduction04/01/14 09:48 PM
3

And in that moment, I was infinite...
/r/seduction10/11/13 03:34 AM
1

Do you really want to go out with a specific girl, or do you just want to say you're in a relationship?
/r/seduction30/10/13 10:27 AM
3

I don't know; typically there aren't any symptoms. If you have kissed any significant number of girls, you are very likely to have it.
/r/seduction30/10/13 04:16 AM
1

Half of the population has oral herpes.
/r/seduction30/10/13 03:45 AM
-1

do u even lift brah ????
/r/seduction29/10/13 04:40 AM
1

Yep. The style was fucking painful.
/r/seduction23/10/13 07:58 AM
-7

What a load of shit. You're replacing your own self-imposed "nice guy syndrome" with "arrogant yet somehow still awkward douchebag". Like seriously, "This conversation is boring. Let's talk about something more exciting."? That's the most pathetically awkward pre-prepared escape phrase ever.
/r/seduction21/07/13 01:34 AM
0

Yes, please attempt to insult people rather than make a substantiated argument. You're the stereotype that makes people ashamed to identify as MRAs.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:27 AM
-1

Fuck off back to Idiotville. You're really just proving my point even more now. A mindblowing level of doublethink.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:55 AM
-4

Nice way to stoop to their level and reinforce negative stereotypes.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:39 AM
8

Do you have a problem with baby girls getting their vaginas mutilated?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:46 PM
14

Korea probably isn't the best choice at the moment.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:59 AM
12

It's completely understandable, but still stupid to do that and slash her tyres. Fuels her accusations.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 01:58 PM
2

I was a little confused at first.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:49 AM
1

How does the source of a quotation matter?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 12:30 AM
2

Khan Academy unfortunately only covers up to one or two university level math courses :/
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:31 AM
2

I didn't say he/she did; I said it was implied. Here in Australia we have a female Prime Minister for fucks sake, but there's still many more men in parliament, and people call that inequality. That does not imply anything negative in and of itself.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:41 AM
1

Good. The voting system is predicated on relevance to the topic, not agreement or disagreement. http://www.reddit.com/help/reddiquette
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:04 AM
7

How is the gender of government representatives relevant? If genders are supposed to be equal, it should make no difference. That is not an example of inequality; it is, ironically, sexist to imply that there should be an enforced equal number of men and women in government. And my point is that gender issues should be tackled based on the issues themselves, regardless of the gender that they correspond to.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:04 AM
2

That depends entirely on the declared intention. If you claim to care about men's rights only, that's fine, as long as you aren't derogatory to women's rights etc. But if you claim to care about equality, and furthermore claim that solving the issues of one gender will result in equality, that is fallacious and sexist.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:02 AM
9

Feminism is equality from a women's rights perspective. Masculinism is equality from a men's rights perspective. Neither are acceptable. Both are sexist in that they seek (or claim to seek) equality by focusing on the rights of one gender to the exclusion of the other. If you actually want equality, try caring about human rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:48 AM
1

I've posted similar statistics before. Her response was "but women get hurt more!". Still no fucks to be given about men, apparently.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:05 AM
53

She does. In every discussion she acts outraged that I dare to point out men's rights issues when women's issues are, obviously, far more important.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:12 PM
6

feminists are the most racist, sexist people on the planet. ...that is also a generalisation.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:26 PM
11

Also labels that other people can apply to you, and often not flatteringly...
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:11 AM
3

If you upvote everything, are you really upvoting anything?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:21 AM
2

an 18-year-old guy sleeping with his 15-year-old girlfriend Not sure if you're implying that that's a bad thing or not.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:14 AM
4

Can you read?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:18 AM
3

What bullshit. The implied conspiracy is stupid enough, but the implication that you're only a "real man" if you conform to some arbitrary set of "masculine" attributes is ridiculous (and ironic considering the narrator's high pitched adolescent voice), and it's just as stupid as feminism. "You have no idea what constitutes manhood". No, you don't for the simple reason that you think there is such a thing. Stereotyping all women as "wanting to be dominated" is fucking pathetic. Did this fucking …
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:35 AM
3

And yet, when I expressed the exact same sentiment about a man who had his teeth ripped out by choosing to go to his ex-gf dentist, I was downvoted and thoroughly abused. The hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:42 AM
9

I would advise not being absolute either way; they're equally as bad. It's the same as feminist telling women "DON'T MAKE SANDWICHES FOR MEN". I mean really... that's just replacing one problem with an equal and opposite one. It's more reasonable to split the cost of the date most of the time. Obviously it depends a lot on the context.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 12:16 PM
5

1: The magnitude of sensitivity is irrelevant. You are forcibly cutting off a part of someone's body without their consent. That is grievous bodily harm and in my mind, child abuse. 2: That survey is meaningless. No men who were circumcised as children can know whether it is better or worse than normal. Only those who are voluntarily circumcised as adults would know, and there's no problem with that. 3: The health benefits argument is firstly bullshit and secondly irrelevant. If you wash your pe…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:08 AM
7

Excuse me? What makes forced circumcision of a female's labia or clitoris a serious criminal act, but forced circumcision of a male's foreskin not?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:44 AM
2

Err, what? No. I have never seen any student being given corporal punishment. Maybe it's still technically legal or something, but if it ever happened, the teacher's career would be FUBAR.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:42 AM
1

Sure, that's their decision. They have that right. The incentive not to do so is the public backlash from such. The wonders of free market capitalism :)
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:02 AM
1

Can you fuck off already? You linked me to my comment where I stated that the victim was not to blame; but he put himself in an unnecessarily risky situation. That is not a fact, that is your opinion, and no it is not up for debate. This entire useless fucking discussion has gone around in circles about 8 times now. Clearly the only logical conclusion is that you're a pathetic retard. Feel free to comment all you like - I won't reply ever again.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:50 AM
1

Not at all. I have stayed true to my original statement the entire time, regardless of your stupidity.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:41 AM
0

Of course I didn't blame the victim you stupid fuck, as I've said dozens of times. Your inability to comprehend the difference between victim blaming and harm minimisation is not my fault.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:14 AM
1

No you didn't. You simply crapped on about how no one blames female victims but they blame male victims. I did not do either; I demonstrated the difference clearly, and if you can't understand the difference between harm minimisation and victim blaming, I have nothing more to say.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:44 AM
1

You don't see how that's relevant?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:21 AM
1

Dish it out and you'll get it served right back you pathetic cunt.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:21 AM
1

Would you advise your daughter to dress sluttily, get drunk at a party and walk around a dangerous neighbourhood? Of course not. Why? Why won't you answer this?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:26 AM
0

ROFL. I don't know how to argue? You have no fucking clue how a debate works. Utilising ad hominems in lieu of an actual argument and ignoring relevant corollaries makes you a fucking retard. Shouldn't you be sucking your dad's dick you pathetic fuck?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:25 AM
1

It's not a double standard. As I've said before, it applies equally to females. Let me ask you something. Would you advise your daughter to dress sluttily, get drunk at a party and walk around a dangerous neighbourhood? Of course not. Why? Because it would be her fault of she were raped? Of course not! It's not the victims fault if something occurs; they simply could have reduced the risk of it happening. Risk mitigation != blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:21 PM
0

When you answer why you wouldn't tell your kid to dress sluttily and walk around a dangerous neighbourhood, I'll consider it. Retard.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:44 AM
0

Cool story you pathetic, mentally retarded piece of shit. Once again, you have asserted without substantiating anything.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:06 AM
1

Keep telling yourself that you pathetic piece of shit. You're the retard who's either too stupid or too dishonest to admit that you demonstrated nothing; you merely asserted; and when confronted with my demonstration, you simply ignored it because you wanted to. I'm not backpedaling anything. Everything I said remains true whether you're smart enough to understand it or not.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 02:16 PM
0

Wow, you really don't know when to shut your ignorant mouth, do you? Most of my comments do not have negative karma. The majority do, in fact, have positive karma: hence the positive balance of karma you fucking moron I'm not a troll. I made a correct statement which many people agree with; but many obviously did not understand. I probably did not phrase it well enough. I have since done so several times. I'm not ignorant, and there's nothing wrong with my brain. I'm an engineering student. I am…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:58 AM
0

Actually I did but apparently that only applies to inboxes since I can see this reply. Interesting how you didn't comment on my highly successful /r/MR submission though. Retard dumfuck cunthole shitfaggot cockhead :) I treat shitbags who blame victims this way. Since you're crapping on about it so much, maybe you're the one who thinks the victim is to blame Are you so obsessed with arguing that you can't leave someone blocked? Ironic and hypocrticial yet again since you keep crapping on about t…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:38 AM
0

Yup, the circlejerk train has reached its end multiple times before. It's literally going around in circles of "LOL YOUR A LYING PIECE OF SHIT BECAUSE UHH THATS MY OPINION LOL". Good day and good luck retard - you'll need it if this is how you treat people.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:34 AM
0

Haha, judging me by 5 comments is cute. Just because I'm having a concurrent disagreement in TwoX doesn't mean everyone hates me. Hence the 10,000+ comment karma. Maybe you should take a couple of seconds more. You know, for example: www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s9cia/apparently_its_only_wrong_if_a_man_hits_a_woman/ Also, are you actually 10 years old? That would explain a lot. edit: a cursory glance at your comment history is similarly disparaging. You hypocritical "lying piece of shit"…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:27 AM
0

No, it makes it clear that many of the community's members did not comprehend the obvious (to me) distinction. Anyway, I've had enough of this hypocritical 10 year old bullshit. Enjoy being blocked.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:00 AM
0

That's a fact? Really? ROFL. If it's a fact, fucking prove it you retard. The fact that you consider an argument null because you want to proves a complete lack of regard for logic, reason and the debating process. You have no idea how to debate. No one in the world is going to listen to you - no matter how valid your point is - if you go around insulting people. Arguing with you is like arguing with a Christian or playing chess with a pigeon: you knock over the pieces, shit on the board and str…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 02:41 AM
1

you blamed the victim Something you have never proven and I have conclusively disproven. Learn how to debate and I might actual listen. Your arguments don't matter. Well, that's certainly convincing! Instead of demonstrating why my arguments don't matter, why not just assert it! Fantastic debate, derp! Oh, and obligatory "HURR GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU DISGUSTING LIAR YOUR LITERALLY WORSE THAN HITLER"
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:31 PM
1

Lol, you're the retard who completely ignored all of my arguments because "OH THATS NOT RELEVANT. WHY? BECAUSE I DONT WANT IT TO BE". Fucking pathetic. Just fuck off. You have no idea how to debate. Your pathetic ad hominems mean that no matter what your point is (although you don't actually have a point in this case), no one is going to listen to you or change. You want to convince me? Make a fucking argument. But you won't, so just fuck off. You're not scary, you're not intimidating, you're th…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:25 PM
1

You are mentally retarded if, after all my explanation, you still think I "blamed the victim". Your "argument" this entire time has been "YOU BLAME VICTIM YOU LIE ABOUT". You haven't substantiated a single fucking thing; while I demonstrated widely that I made a valid point. You committed a disgusting array of logical fallacies, and you want to turn it back on me. You are a fucking retard. Grow a brain. Shut the fuck up. Stop making yourself look even more ignorant.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:17 PM
1

Are you mentally retarded? Minimising risk has been my ENTIRE FUCKING POINT THIS ENTIRE TIME. He could have taken risk minimising action. He didn't. As a result, he was in a position for her to take advantage of him, and she did. She is guilty, she is responsible and she will be treated as such in court. There is a reason you would tell your kids not to put themselves in such situations as I described above, but of course you're ignoring that because you're too retarded to see how it's relevant.…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:17 PM
1

Lol, you don't get to "let me off the hook" or not. I can write whatever the fuck I want. Your pathetic argument the entire time, and I use the term "argument" loosely, is "OMG IF YOU SAY IT'S STUPID FOR PEOPLE TO PUT THEMSELVES IN HIGH RISK SITUATIONS, THEY ARE TO BLAME FOR WHAT HAPPENS". No you collossal derp. I have said repeatedly, harm minimisation through avoiding risky situations is smart. Therefore, putting yourself in a risky situation is a stupid decision. It does not mean you are to b…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:41 AM
1

A meaningless question? Nothing could be more pertinent. You would not advise your son to go to his ex girlfriend for surgery. You would not advise your daughter to go into gang territory wearing skimpy clothing. I asked why. You dodged it. I'll tell you why: BECAUSE IT IS STUPID. Not because it would be your children's fault if harm came to them - but because they could have reduced the chance of it happening. If you cannot see the difference there, there is nothing more to say. You are deluded…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:23 AM
1

I adore how you're dodging the question.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:19 AM
1

So you're saying that you wouldn't advise your daughter not to go out into gang territory wearing skimpy clothing? Because that would of course be blaming the victim, right? Pathetic. Obviously you can see the difference, but you can't help yourself. CONTINUE SHOUTING HOW MUCH OF A DUMB FUCK SHIT HEAD CUNT HOLE HEAD COCK 8 YEAR OLD XBOX LIVE PLAYER YOU ARE
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:13 AM
65

"Equality for women" Equality... for one specific subset... I don't even ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:59 AM
1

Assuming you're mentally capable of having a rational debate, let's examine that problem. I'm saying you can't hide behind that. I'm not hiding behind anything. If you disagree with what I'm saying, then state your claim. Resorting to ad hominems achieves literally nothing, and just makes you look bad. You decided to be a stupid fuck and you get to deal with the consequences. I decided to post a reasoned argument, and I get to deal with the downvotes. OH NO! You can't blame him for her crime. I …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:57 AM
-1

You can't blame him for her crime. You're condoning her actions if you do. That makes you just as much of a sick fuck as she is. FUCK YOU. DO YOU REALLY FUCKING THINK THIS IS THE WAY TO HAVE A RATIONAL DEBATE YOU STUPID FUCKING CUNT?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:44 AM
-1

Do you even know what an ad hominem is? I know your type. The pathetic aggressive derp who, instead of attacking an argument, says "OH WELL YOU MUST BE A FUCKING CUNT WHORE MOTHERFUCKER SHIT DICK COCKHOLE BITCH! YEAH CUNT! HOW YOU LIKE THAT ASSHOLE! I AM BIG CAVE MAN" No, fuck you. No, going to a dentist wasn't wrong. Going to his ex girlfriend was stupid. You would not advise your son to do that any more than you would advise your daughter to go out late at night wearing skimpy clothing. Does t…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:33 AM
-1

I didn't blame the victim as I've said repeatedly. If you can't understand that, and you need to resort to childish pathetic ad hominems, then don't even bother replying.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:23 AM
0

Can you read? I literally said "It doesn't change the nature of what she did". Obviously she deserves to be in prison asshat.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:15 AM
-8

They are all stupid decisions to make. It doesn't mean the victim is to blame, it means the victim knowingly increased the chances of such actions occurring. It's not pretty, but it's reality.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 02:53 PM
-22

I'm not saying it was his fault, I'm saying it was a stupid decision. How can you not see the difference?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:32 AM
-39

Excuse me? I did not blame the victim. I explicitly said it doesn't change the nature of the crime. But it was a stupid decision to make.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:03 AM
-62

It doesn't change the nature of what she did, but the guy was pretty stupid to go to his EX GIRLFRIEND of all dentists when he had a toothache.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 07:44 AM
117

Oh come on... we can do better than attacks on her appearance. That's like feminists calling us neckbeards.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:27 PM
-1

No, I hate you because you're a pathetic sexist troll. We do not accept that shit on this subreddit and you have been downvoted thoroughly as a result.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:48 AM
0

Cool story slut. You can fuck off back to the rest of your feminist thundercunt friends on SRS now.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:12 AM
0

That's adorable. You can clean the puss out of your vagina now :)
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:26 AM
1

Sexist troll detected.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:20 PM
2

No it is not.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:19 PM
13

Yes, the foreskin only contains thousands of extremely sensitive nerves. No big deal.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:03 PM
1

Haha... bit awkward to carry around all day. Also wouldn't help...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:27 PM
1

Guns are for the most part prohibited in Australia.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:58 PM
1

Australia.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:57 PM
3

Okay, you can give up your life for X person if you want, whatever, but don't pretend like it's fair, and don't force other people to do the same.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:17 AM
3

Drafts do not exist in my country and nor should they. If they did, there is no reason women shouldn't fight in it. Women fight in voluntary armed forces right now and there's no difference between them and the men. And the purpose is not to "PROTECT TEH WIMMENZ AND TEH CHILDREN", it's to protect everyone. Seriously, fuck your sexist bullshit. You're a "real man"? Wow! What makes you more of a man than anyone else with a dick? Yeah, nothing. You know your place? Great, you've decided to be pussy…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:05 AM
3

On the Titanic, there were partially empty boats so yes, men should also have gone on them. Neither men nor women should ever participate in a draft. And you're entirely missing the point of rights vs what is right: you can do whatever the fuck you want as long as it doesn't act to the detriment of others but don't you ever try to force it on others through law.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:09 PM
7

I guarantee it would be "I would never raise my son to be such a pussy" or "I would never marry someone who's not a real man".
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:21 AM
3

Sigh. This is half the problem. Apart from the "girl is man enough to hit a man" example of stereotyping, the fact that you don't think we should have equal rights is disgusting and absurd. Should black people not have the same rights as white people? That's what I thought. If you want to be nice to a woman, by all means. You have the right to be nice or not to anyone, man or woman. I advocate being nice to people, not one particular gender ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:57 AM
1

Actually she defriended me and apparently delelted all but 4 comments. Although that sounds like a lot of work so maybe facebook deleted them or something.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:10 AM
3

Communicating with study groups.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 06:28 AM
2

Eh. It's pretty much a necessity at university.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 06:00 AM
3

It's ignorant sexist assholes like you who are eroding our own rights. You should be ashamed of yourself. And since over a thousand people all over the world agree with me, I don't give a single fuck what you think.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:58 AM
3

If this woman wanted to kill you, you would be dead. Shut your ignorant redneck mouth.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:34 AM
4

In fact she "liked" every violent comment.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:33 AM
3

They aren't my friends.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:31 AM
3

Apparently, take it.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:31 AM
3

They aren't my friends.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:30 AM
2

Me, green, male. Red, actual OP, female.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:30 AM
3

They aren't my friends. Friends wouldn't threaten me.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:28 AM
2

Yeah I did later point out cases of male rape and genital mutilation. Thread went for over 100 comments :/
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:28 AM
3

They aren't my friends. They're redneck douchebags who happen to be the OP's friends.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:27 AM
3

They were never my friends. My friends would not threaten my life.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:27 AM
3

They aren't my friends. I would not befriend violent douchebags who would threaten me.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:24 AM
3

Honestly, I no longer care . They threatened my life, so if someone on the internet wants to prank call them, they're welcome as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:23 AM
1

You can message people you aren't friends with.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:22 AM
5

Having lived in a redneck country town for 17 years, yes the term does apply. Though in this case, these derps are more a cross between bogans and rednecks.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:17 AM
7

Yeah... they aren't my friends. First of all I wouldn't befriend douchebags like that, and secondly if someone threatens me they are no longer my friend.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:52 PM
13

Wait wait wait lol... none of them are my friends. My friends would not threaten my life.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:51 PM
5

Oh the title... sigh... my bad Fixed.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:40 PM
1

They have been redacted.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:39 PM
15

Okay here they are: http://i.imgur.com/4QaYb.png http://i.imgur.com/OR4cU.png http://i.imgur.com/w038e.png http://i.imgur.com/8NmtJ.png edit: FIXED
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:36 PM
2

Okay give me a minute.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:31 PM
10

The sarcasm would not be detected.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:08 PM
2

We need to think long term here. Say it goes to the extreme of court and prison. What would the consequences of that be? With those types of people, I think it would be quite likely that they (when they are released from prison) and their family (in the mean time) could come after me. It seems like stirring the hornets nest which is a little unnecessary when I'm safe for the moment at college.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 02:57 PM
3

I don't know, I've been in court and heard a rep from a service provider providing a recording of a phone conversation. This is Australia, remember. But yeah, if I do get to the phone call idea, I will record it with a PC mic. At this point, calling the police is excessive. I've talked it over with several close people and I'm quite sure that I'm safe for the moment - it's realistically impossible to get past my college's security, and I don't see how they would find me in public. If they do, I …
/r/MensRights14/04/12 02:50 PM
7

They (thankfully) live hours away but I could do the recording thing with my phone? Do service providers keep a record of all calls? I have their number. As for calling the cops, do you really think it's that serious? :S ed: I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 02:01 PM
20

I have.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:57 PM
9

Oh I'm only friends with the OP, not any of those violent douchebags.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:44 PM
8

I agree. Those people are neither interested in nor capable of having a rational debate.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:20 PM
14

I agree, which is why I quite politely corrected the status. I am not the one who went around calling people faggots or girls or being sexist.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:23 PM
20

Haha thanks for the thought...
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:18 PM
49

Logic? In redneck country Straya, we don't need logic!
/r/MensRights14/04/12 11:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter