TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Whatthefuzzybear Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by Whatthefuzzybear on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

What I said here is congruent to the linked definition. The question is how does it conclude that male rape isn't seen as rape in the eyes of the law? The answer is - the law does recognize male rape victims. The reddit title is false and you substantiated this by linking the rape definition. How old are you? it seems like you can't even comprehend your own link.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 08:02 AM
-1

I don't even know what you are talking about. The new definition gives a broader perspective about rape. That includes a comprehensive approach involving rape against men. The link not only debunks the reddit title, it also proves the opposite of what was said. The law recognizes rape against men by talking about any object or body part used to harass the victim is considered rape.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 05:35 AM
-3

That updated definition actually debunks the title of the reddit post. And it adds a better idea of being inclusive to actually acknowledge men victims.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 08:35 PM
-2

Which law framework? Where does it say this?
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 01:50 PM
-4

Maybe because female on male rape isn’t seen as rape? Your quote has no legal standing nor any credible studies. The main post was about addressing how society is dominated by men. Maybe because female on male violence isn’t seen as violence? Again, that has no legal standing nor any credibility of research. The original photo are all based on studies that focuses on abuses against women and probably the minority of some men victims.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 01:15 PM
1

Im sorry if you think that we are arguing. I dont really care about upvotes I try to question everything with a simple why and try to understand the other side but not to the point to change their mind but to extend fully their thinking points. I think the ones that doesnt want to comment can just read away and formulate opinions. Based
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 09:22 PM
0

If youre always ending with equality then just say men and women should just go to war and all die equaly so that no one gets left out. Easy communism. /s
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 09:09 PM
-8

Im only concern about what you said primarily advocating brutal equivalence. I wouldnt be concerned if you said "women are equal to men because equal opportunities" rather than "all women should go to war because let them die like this disaster".
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 08:47 PM
-8

Whats concerning is that youre trying to estimate that all women should experience normandy just because their women? As a guy i would not like to be in a ww2 and neither will i desire anybody to experience such a tragedy.
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 08:27 PM
-5

"Make all female battalions and put them up the front" experience ww2" why would you assemble all women? Why? What is the reason that makes you sadistic to women?
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 08:06 PM
1

In a 2016 Rasmussen Reports poll, 61% of men favoured extending the draft registration to both sexes while only 38% of women supported doing so. That said, both men and women are not keen about the draft in general. Only 29% of all voters support it, according to the 2016 poll.
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 07:52 PM
4

Whats more interesting are the misogygnistic comments without really getting context at all. Very questionable.
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 07:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter