~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | The fact that we even have the discussion about whether circumcision has any medical or hygiene benefits shows how little society cares about boys' and men's basic autonomyThe purposeful pedestalizing of FGM and downplaying MGM keeps it legal: Circumcision is purposely imposed upon the organ that gave the baby life, which may one day perpetuate more life. It is a cut upon the sexual organ and not the earlobe or the finger, as a symbol of cut, curtailed, disciplined sexuality. This interpretation is not wholly new. As early as the twelfth century, Maimonides saw the rite as reducing sexuality to a manageable level. Today we need this idea rearticulated. Jewish view… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/26 10:19 AM |
| 3 | Why are men, in general, far more sympathetic to female bodily autonomy than women, in general, are to male bodily autonomy?Some parents care about conflict of interest: American Academy of Pediatrics boardmember hoodwinked parents to normalize his own religious ritual as a medical benefit (https://youtu.be/FCuy163srRc?t=4284), that seems shady to say the least and criminally negligent. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/24 01:33 AM |
| 2 | Why are men, in general, far more sympathetic to female bodily autonomy than women, in general, are to male bodily autonomy?Looks like we need a Type I-IV classification for MGM When people think of FGM, they likely think of the gruesome Type I II and III, the horrifying sewing shut, slicing off craziness. They are not aware of Type IV, which includes something of a "benign" mutilation involving a ritual prick with a needle to draw a drop of blood. Of course, all types of FGM are mutilation and outlawed in most societies. But are they aware girls get mutilated in countries like Singapore and Indonesia in medical sett… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/24 01:31 AM |
| -1 | Why are men, in general, far more sympathetic to female bodily autonomy than women, in general, are to male bodily autonomy?🤣 Look up a pro-circumcision study and if the authors include Brian J Morris, circumcised men’s parents were hoodwinked to promote circumcision and his fetish of cutting styles that shorten the child and man’s penis: NSFL https://i.ibb.co/VHB9P4S/IMG-6712.jpg | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/24 01:26 AM |
| 0 | Why are men, in general, far more sympathetic to female bodily autonomy than women, in general, are to male bodily autonomy?Not all forms of FGM remove the clitoris, but there are women who voluntarily get labiaplasty and report a diminished orgasm experience after the procedure, something they say they were aware of the risk. Still, the clitoris is a quite large structure, with the external bean that is the part getting cut off and there is also the internal part of the clitoris that would wreak complete havoc down there if it was to be surgically removed in it’s entirety. It’s like saying MGM removes the frenulum a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/24 01:02 AM |
| 5 | Why are men, in general, far more sympathetic to female bodily autonomy than women, in general, are to male bodily autonomy?It's all so tiresome u/Realistic-Ad-1023 u/howdoiw0rkthisthing American Academy of Pediatrics boardmember hoodwinked parents to normalize his own religious ritual as a medical benefit (https://youtu.be/FCuy163srRc?t=4284), that seems shady to say the least and criminally negligent. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/24 12:59 AM |
| 79 | American media disparaging male genitals causes man to "ruin his penis"“There was so much skin! It looked like a split ballsack!” I think the women simping for circumcision have a form of ugly pussy energy they subconsciously project. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/24 06:15 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.I leave it to the outside readers: Foreskin has apocrine glands. Apocrine sweat glands, also referred to as odoriferous sweat glands, are known for producing malodorous perspiration. They are large, branched glands, mostly confined to the axillary and perineal regions, including the perianal region, labia majora in women, and the scrotum and prepuce in men. Apocrine sweat glands are also present in the nipples and areolar tissue surrounding the nipples.[1][2][3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/book… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 09:25 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Foreskin has apocrine glands. Apocrine sweat glands, also referred to as odoriferous sweat glands, are known for producing malodorous perspiration. They are large, branched glands, mostly confined to the axillary and perineal regions, including the perianal region, labia majora in women, and the scrotum and prepuce in men. Apocrine sweat glands are also present in the nipples and areolar tissue surrounding the nipples.[1][2][3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482278/ Apocrine glands releas… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 07:40 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Take it up with the science | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 04:24 PM |
| 0 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.ok, and an outside reader googles “Foreskin fibroblast for sale” to find sites just plain old selling them: Human Dermal Fibroblasts – Neonatal, Primary $571.20 Status:In stock https://www.lifelinecelltech.com/shop/cells/fibroblasts/dermal-fibroblasts/human-dermal-fibroblasts-neonatal-fc-0001/ FibroGRO™ Xeno-Free Human Foreskin Fibroblasts https://www.emdmillipore.com/US/en/product/FibroGRO-Xeno-Free-Human-Foreskin-Fibroblasts,MM_NF-SCC058 | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 06:24 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Money talks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796620/#:%7E:text=To%20date%2C%20some%20foreskin%2Dderived,(Organogenesis%2C%20Inc.) This study investigated the effect of human foreskin-derived dermal stem/progenitor cell (hFDSPC)-CM combined with HA on a diabetic mouse model and relevant mechanism in vitro. Particularly, as a discarded waste, the human foreskin exhibited attractive potential as an abundant source of MSCs for clinical application without ethical concerns [13]. To date,… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 05:15 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Science is advanced in the organ usage of infants: Apligraf (Organogenesis, Canton, MD) This was previously called Graftskin and is another biological composite skin substitute consisting both of epidermal and dermal components. The dermal aspect is mimicked using a scaffold consisting of bovine type I collagen and human derived foreskin neonatal fibroblasts. The epidermal component consists of human foreskin derived neonatal epidermal keratinocytes that are cultured onto the dermal scaffold and… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 04:16 AM |
| 5 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Outside readers can make their own conclusions. It’s used in skin grafts as well, not worth sacrificing at all tho. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/24 12:17 AM |
| 3 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.First result when you google neonatal foreskin fibroblasts: https://bioscience.lonza.com/lonza_bs/US/en/Primary-and-Stem-Cells/p/000000000000184907/NHDF-Neo-%E2%80%93-Human-Dermal-Fibroblasts%2C-Neonatal | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 10:39 PM |
| 3 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Some subs autoremove subreddit links, I hope it works here r/GrossCutters | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 05:59 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.r/GrossCutters | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 05:57 PM |
| 10 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.Just goes to show the cultural programming. Cropping dog ears hurts some parents’ hearts more than mutilating their child’s genitals. Whatever gets them wet during diaper changes: r GrossCutters | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.u/Ugo_Flickerman | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 03:52 PM |
| 12 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.From that site: An apocrine sweat gland (/ˈæpəkrən, -ˌkraɪn, -ˌkriːn/; from Greek apo 'away' and krinein 'to separate') is composed of a coiled secretory portion located at the junction of the dermis and subcutaneous fat, from which a straight portion inserts and secretes into the infundibular portion of the hair follicle. In humans, apocrine sweat glands are found only in certain locations of the body: the axillae (armpits), areola and nipples of the breast, ear canal, eyelids, wings of the nos… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 01:56 PM |
| 57 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.TL:DR Foreskin releases pheromones that affect women. Foreskin cells are ingredients for Oprah’s skincare cream (not being funny, feel free to google foreskin fibroblasts). Estimated 119-480 babies die annually from circumcision procedures and complications. Some burst their lungs and induce hernia from screaming out of pain. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 07:29 AM |
| 22 | Circumcision sacrifices male pheromone glands as ingredient for cosmetic creams, killing 119-480 babies per year. Some complications have included burst lung and ruptured stomach.I couldn’t figure out how to post my comment on the dankmemes post, but looking now, this is truly some fucked up horrific show. In the words of Rodney Dangerfield, “I tell you, [the dick] gets no respect at all.” Not making it up u/GingrPowr u/BananaNoScoper foreskin releases male pheromones Apocrine Glands These glands of the inner foreskin produce pheromones – nature’s powerful, silent, invisible behavioral signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexuality h… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/24 06:22 AM |
| 7 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.There is no reason to pre-emptively amputate healthy tissue from the genitals of infant males and protect genital integrity of infant females from similar simping arguments for involuntary genital alterations. Adults can get full anesthesia and can request the exact amount of tissue to be removed from their developed penis. The doctor is shooting in the dark for how much tissue to remove from an infant penis he has no clue how it will develop later on. Infants would be under pain from the bare m… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 05:54 AM |
| 12 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.Refutations of the alleged benefits of infant male circumcision Relevant quotes: Penile Cancer More specifically, penile skin carcinoma. Well luckily, penile cancer is one of the rarest forms of cancer in the Western world affecting about 1 man in 100,000 per year. To put that into perspective, that is 100 times rarer than male breast cancer which itself is 100 times rarer than female breast cancer. Penile cancer is also late-forming, almost always occurring at a later age with the average being… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 05:14 PM |
| 46 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.And “I bet there are 100,000 [nerves in the foreskin]” https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1m55s&v=BgoTRMKrJo4 | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 04:03 PM |
| 22 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.Doctors study medical literature omitting the foreskin: https://youtu.be/SB-2aQoTQeA?t=26m22s There is foreskin propaganda in nationwide media: As time went on I discovered my new penis didn’t actually solve any of my problems. When I eventually told friends what I had done, they all asked why. So did the women I told. I didn’t get circumcised because there was anything wrong with my penis - I did it because I felt shamed by American media and their immorally untrue message that foreskins are di… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 03:35 PM |
| 272 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.I changed it. I can’t imagine a scenario where ground up labia lips of infant girls are used in rogain serum for Chris Hemsworth and George Clooney, all promoted on daytime television. It’s really a mind fuck just how much bullshit the male genital has to deal with. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 02:38 PM |
| 63 | Male baby foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products.Moreover, there is an even bigger foreskin industry operating behind the scenes almost invisibly. Neonate foreskins are sold by the hospitals to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies who turn them into highly profitable products. The numbers of dollars involved are staggering, and this financial force funds lobbying and propaganda in favour of circumcision, because the end of circumcision would mean the end of the industry. The resale value of neonate foreskins is dizzying in that from one bab… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 02:26 PM |
| 6 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?Do not fret. Insurance will stop covering circ, Gen Z will meme ridged band to the moon, and the internet arguments will shift from uncut vs cut to intact vs altered and then loose style cuts vs tights style cuts. When people think of FGM, they likely think of the gruesome Type I II and III, the horrifying sewing shut, slicing off craziness. They are not aware of Type IV, which includes something of a "benign" mutilation involving a ritual prick with a needle to draw a drop of blood. Of course, … | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 05:12 AM |
| 7 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?Let the outside readers decide. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 12:58 AM |
| 6 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?A more professional rebuttal to Morris https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1079164114784714752.html or https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1079164114784714752 | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 12:47 AM |
| 9 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?“conflicts of interest is a hallmark of any scientific research” Case in point about Morris: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1079164114784714752.html or https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1079164114784714752 | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 12:45 AM |
| 9 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?You’re literally simping for the author that lies to promote circumcision and his fetish of cutting styles that shorten the child and man’s penis: Brian J Morris https://i.ibb.co/VHB9P4S/IMG-6712.jpg NSFW You are suffering from meatal stenosis: Meatal stenosis is a common complication of circumcision, caused from chronic exposure of the irritating effects of urine on the meatus and rubbing of the meatus on a diaper or clothing. You don’t smooth out genitals to prevent infections: NSFW https://i.… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 12:14 AM |
| 12 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?The author in question: https://i.ibb.co/VHB9P4S/IMG-6712.jpg NSFW I’m sure cut men wouldn’t be too happy the author’s obsession with being pro-circumcision hoodwinked their parents. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 12:02 AM |
| 8 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?You are correct u/peter_venture I’m surprised he didn’t list out the HIV cope as well. Circumcision and lifetime risk of urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Let's see the authors... Brian J. Morris I'm sure the circumcision fetishist guy will skew anything to say pro-circumcision: Brian James Morris[1] (born 14 July 1950[2]) is a molecular biologist and retired professor of molecular medical sciences at the University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.[3][4] He is an avid circ… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 11:52 PM |
| 8 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?There are no benefits to cutting off skin and exposing the urethra to contaminants NSFW https://i.ibb.co/dgWCJ4x/IMG-6667.jpg Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) A boy's overall risk of contracting a UTI is about 1%. And according to the AAP report, it takes over 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. UTIs can be treated if and when they occur by using less invasive means like antibiotics. One case of UTI may be prevented at the cost of 2 cases of hemorrhage, infection, or, in rare instances, more seve… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 11:45 PM |
| 10 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?It seems to be more normalized to disparage male genitals. I referred to exposed clitoris to mean clitoral hood removal version of FGM. When people think of FGM, they likely think of the gruesome Type I II and III, the horrifying sewing shut, slicing off craziness. They are not aware of Type IV, which includes something of a "benign" mutilation involving a ritual prick with a needle to draw a drop of blood. Of course, all types of FGM are mutilation and outlawed in most societies. But are they a… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 09:51 PM |
| 17 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?Exposed large clits from FGM wouldn’t be appropriate response either. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 09:25 PM |
| 21 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?Genital Mutilation and object rape with a probe and knife “To me, my grievance seems pretty straightforward. I was overpowered at the weakest point of my life, strapped naked by the wrists and ankles to a circumstraint, spread-eagled, while someone stimulated my penis to erection, before inserting things into it and cutting flesh from it (NSFL). Instead of sympathy for this I've been mocked and laughed at, lied to about what happened, called crazy and even pedophile for "being so interested in c… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 07:27 PM |
| 26 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?There’s something deeply resentful of men about this whole thing. This isn’t just a preference, this is projecting “ugly pussy energy” Human anatomy doesn't mean a thing when a guy has a disgusting looking uncircumsized d--k. Too bad if the truth hurts. Its disgusting & he has to go. Thank you, next. NSFW https://i.ibb.co/2jJpPSn/IMG-6668.jpg NSFW https://i.ibb.co/dgWCJ4x/IMG-6667.jpg | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 06:04 PM |
| 69 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?3 mindfucks about circumcision/MGM I may never get over: /1. Selling foreskins like hoodoo medicine: Imagine George Clooney spreading rogain serum derived from Malaysian infant girls’ clitorises https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7JzdcZPvzg /2. Shaming foreskins in nationwide media: As time went on I discovered my new penis didn’t actually solve any of my problems. When I eventually told friends what I had done, they all asked why. So did the women I told. I didn’t get circumcised because there wa… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 04:59 PM |
| 3 | Anti-Circumcision SelfiesBecause fresh infant tissue does not have contaminants. Good for facial creams i guess | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 09:25 PM |
| 6 | Anti-Circumcision SelfiesKeyword: should Skin accomodates constant tension upon it by expanding. Fat accumulation puts constant pressure for skin to expand. Erections are infrequent and do not put consistent nor constant pressure to induce growth and expansion for comfortable erections: Yep, that’s what I have going on. I need lube just to jerk off, I used to not use it (because I was a kid) and my dick would just be sore all the time. Using the super small movement method. I remember posting about it online and they wh… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 03:28 PM |
| 7 | Anti-Circumcision SelfiesPerhaps some of the smiling nurses strapping them down are r grosscutters | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 03:10 PM |
| 3 | Anti-Circumcision SelfiesAll the lube in the world will not solve a tight style circumcision: https://archive.md/QfJ0Q | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 02:32 PM |
| 11 | Anti-Circumcision SelfiesIt is object rape. A circumcision probe must be forcibly penetrated between the fused foreskin and glans of infants and children in order to separate it for excision. Like lifting a nail off its fingerbed. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 02:25 PM |
| 3 | Woman protesting infant circumcision in Ocean City, MarylandSource for pic https://twitter.com/bloodstainedmen/status/1602372611375144960?s=46&t=tlbJmA_r5sdksfx8Kfm6wQ | /r/MensRights | 18/12/22 06:43 PM |
| 2 | Hi, I’m currently researching circumcision, consent and medical autonomy for a college research paper and it would be great if I knew your thoughts!r/circumcisiongrief | /r/MensRights | 05/12/22 02:25 AM |
| 16 | The Secret Injustice: Circumcising Infants is Wrong | Opinion | The Harvard CrimsonImagine cutting bits of your private parts off to satiate someone’s fetish in that way. Ancient Greek energy says to enjoy the natural state of your body and worthy women will appreciate it: https://www.reddit.com/r/ForeskinPleasure/comments/rr8oef/i_love_my_husbands_uncut_dick/ | /r/MensRights | 15/11/22 05:35 AM |
| 8 | The Secret Injustice: Circumcising Infants is Wrong | Opinion | The Harvard CrimsonOh nowadays, I think it’s anything from the mother not even wanting to see it when diaper changing, to the father insecure his son will be successful in the sexual marketplace. Ignorant doctors, nurses, and urologists especially will recommend it by pushing the infection scare on parents. Some will even purposefully retract the still fused skin to cause scarring and induce a permanent fusing to warrent circumcision. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/22 12:56 AM |
| 16 | The Secret Injustice: Circumcising Infants is Wrong | Opinion | The Harvard CrimsonInfluence of Victorian-age doctors and belief at the time that masturbation and too much sexuality were the causes of illnesses like blindness even. Some quack named Kellogg who was proud to be chaste and bragged about sleeping in a separate bed from his wife recommended slicing off the foreskin of boys and pouring carbolic acid on girls’ clitorises to discourage masturbation. Though one was dropped, the other continues and Kellogg liked the tight cuts more than the loose cuts. Influence of peop… | /r/MensRights | 15/11/22 12:44 AM |
| 13 | What does circumcision actually take away?It depends on the style of cut and essentially how much loose skin is left. There are men who end up with a tight cut style. When erect, their shaft skin is taut and can be painful and prone to tears. The scrotum skin and pubic skin may be pulled up along the shaft to compensate for the erection expanding it. There are men who end up with a loose cut style. As opposed to tight cut men who require some form of artificial lubrication to facilitate comfortable stimulation, loose cut men have enough… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/22 08:00 AM |
| 0 | I think this sub might be getting out of hand a bit.If I was reincarnated as a woman, I would certainly want to avoid some places in particular. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 08:56 AM |
| 3 | The inequality in genital value: a pin prick on a vagina is considered a mutilation but a lifetime of purchasing artificial lubrication is considered a health benefit for the owner and potential users of a penis.The difference between it being optional vs a necessity. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 08:06 PM |
| 16 | The inequality in genital value: a pin prick on a vagina is considered a mutilation but a lifetime of purchasing artificial lubrication is considered a health benefit for the owner and potential users of a penis.Garbage. Females lubricate, males do not. A circumcised male has no problem with intercourse whatsoever. Not all dicks are the same and not all circumcision procedures end up the same. Some men lose more than others, some less. The loose cut guys’ anecdotes shouldn’t drown out the tight cut guys’ testimonies. As if by design, the tight cut penis becomes a suction piston pulling out the vaginal lubrication, thus requiring even more purchase of lubrication. Excuse the crude meme NSFW https://ibb.c… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 02:38 AM |
| 15 | The state of circumcisions in NorwayWhy do people have a problem with circumcision? Altering a person’s body, their genitals of all places, without informed consent. Violating a person’s bodily autonomy by taking a surgical risk of complications and death for cosmetic surgery on their genitals. Removal of the ridged band, frenulum, frenular delta, and/or inner foreskin, which are the regions in the body with the most concentration of Meissner’s corpuscle nerves. (What are they? Run a fingernail across the back of your hand. Then r… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/22 07:30 AM |
| 3 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionI will inform your children of what you elected for them. They will consider you as an enemy to their bodily autonomy. | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 04:29 AM |
| 2 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.It’s the circumcision for them, because not all circumcisions are the same and some men lose more than others: https://ibb.co/cyRMB8D It’s strange to be here in this time, knowing how circumcision will be viewed by future generations. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 11:18 PM |
| 2 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.There was a study being done measuring changes in the infants’ brains before and after circ but the results were getting controversial and it got shut down. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage?amp When doctors aren’t even studying the foreskin, you can surmise how behind we are on the mental effects and later consequences of inflicting such pain and trauma. A study of 90 American medical textbooks found that upwards of 70% of the de… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 05:10 PM |
| 2 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.I’m not as dedicated as the men who protest in the streets or do all the research for r/Intactivism, but for me I was emotionally affected by this man’s feelings toward circumcision: full text: "I think even when someone suffers something as bad as losing a limb in an accident, it is reasonable to expect them to move on eventually. But what if their limb was intentionally cut off and their attacker went free? I imagine that in that case, it would be much harder for the person to process psycholo… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 12:08 PM |
| 2 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.Lack of empathy is common in America. r/circumcisiongrief r/foreskin_restoration | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 11:46 AM |
| 7 | It's called Male genital mutilation.I’m guessing a copper age tradition invented to punish slaves and deny them pleasure does do its job, no matter how fluffed up those on the receiving end try to make it out to be spiritually unique and divine. Although many loose cut guys may not complain, tight cut guys definitely know they got ripped off more cruelly: https://ibb.co/cyRMB8D NSFW live demonstrations: https://redgifs.com/watch/woodendistinctkronosaurus https://redgifs.com/watch/cornsilkoldlacecicada | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 12:29 AM |
| 2 | It's called Male genital mutilation.I couldn’t agree with you more. There’s a lot of things going on, and I’d welcome you to r/Intactivism to ask them. They are very welcoming and can provide the many perspectives on how things got so f’d up like this. There were countries like Iceland that tried to ban non-medical circumcision for minors and a religious lobby group blackmailed Iceland and its tourism industry if they passed the law. Same in Finland. And the mainstream media depiction doesn’t help things: https://www.reddit.com/r/… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 11:10 PM |
| 7 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Well, if you think FGM should be illegal, MGM should be illegal. This is from and for an American perspective. There are varying forms of MGM and FGM. And although there are analogous parts for male and female genitals that can be formed from the same initial cells, they are not innervated the same when fully formed and they serve different functions from each other. When people think of FGM, they likely think of the gruesome Type I II and III, the horrifying sewing shut, slicing off craziness. … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:22 PM |
| 7 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Circumcision is very anti-Jewish boys’ sexual health, by design: Part III, Chapter 49 Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for is activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects what is defective congenitally. This gave the possibility to everyone to raise an objection and to say: How can natural things be defective so that they need to be perfected from outside, all the more because we know how useful t… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:21 PM |
| 9 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Well, there was a miscommunication with what John Harvey Kellogg meant by hygienic. It was more to do with "moral hygiene", hygiene of the soul when it started to be medicalized through bunk science in the Victorian Era https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0?t=47m54s It was used by Victorian puritan doctors to make it really miserable to masturbate for boys and girls. It didn’t catch on for girls, but some boys get cut so tight, the skin is taut and pubic hair skin has to be pulled up to compensate. John … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:15 PM |
| 1 | It's called Male genital mutilation.I’m pretty sure Yahweh or those claiming to speak for him hated you as a biologically male human. Case in point: Contrary to the Greeks and Romans, who believed in keeping the glans covered to show sexual control, Philo argued that removing the foreskin was what allowed Jewish men even greater control over their sexual passions. But why circumcise only males? In a volume entitled Questions and Answers on Genesis, Philo’s answer is that ‘‘the male has more pleasure in, and desire for, mating than… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:13 PM |
| 8 | It's called Male genital mutilation.And the religion itself says this: Contrary to the Greeks and Romans, who believed in keeping the glans covered to show sexual control, Philo argued that removing the foreskin was what allowed Jewish men even greater control over their sexual passions. But why circumcise only males? In a volume entitled Questions and Answers on Genesis, Philo’s answer is that ‘‘the male has more pleasure in, and desire for, mating than does the female, and he is more ready for it. Therefore Herightly leaves out … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:10 PM |
| 10 | It's called Male genital mutilation.Imagine supporting this fetish for circumcision “benefits” researchers like Brian Morris who wrote that study: https://ibb.co/8N1FqGv | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 09:03 PM |
| 80 | It's called Male genital mutilation.It’s also a fetish for circumcision “benefits” researchers: https://ibb.co/8N1FqGv | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 05:07 AM |
| 8 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.At the very least, I hope more cut men adopt #MyCockMyChoice and not take a single iota of shit any more until MGM is made illegal. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/22 02:05 AM |
| 7 | In American culture, male genitals deserve more respect and love, and circumcision enforces the opposite.Some men have more balls than others and put their children above culture/traditions that will harm them: https://archive.md/DgDfY | /r/MensRights | 25/04/22 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...When American doctors know less than me because they are studying medical literature that omits the foreskin: https://youtu.be/SB-2aQoTQeA?t=26m22s anyone who is not anti-genital mutilation lose all credibility. Just gonna leave you with this: “To me, my grievance seems pretty straightforward. I was overpowered at the weakest point of my life, strapped naked by the wrists and ankles to a circumstraint, spread-eagled, while someone stimulated my penis to erection, before inserting things into it … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Take it up with the bronze age goat herders that came up with circumcision to amputate pleasurable nerves. Cut men focus on the orgasm, no the ride to orgasm, because most have lost the ridged band and frenulum. Some need a “death grip” when masturbating to sufficiently stimulate the corpus cavernosum, the only pleasurable component left in their penis. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 11:47 PM |
| 3 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...No, because like Moses and the bronze age goat herders that came up with circumcision, you have to be smoking crack to think that is a solution in any form. Complaining about can’t control your urges to eat, might I suggest shaving off the tastebuds on your tongue? I bet Maimonides would have given me a thumbs up for that one. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 07:03 AM |
| 2 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...They might just become intactivists themselves if my Jewish homie Eric’s company r/foregen succeeds with transplanting lab grown foreskin with the nerves for men with r/circumcisiongrief Many a Jewish boys will be feeling the FOMO of the cut goys that are now uncut and enjoying the full sexual pleasures as nature intended it. Back to the Torah and what Jewish leaders are teaching them: Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for is activity be diminished and the organ be in as … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 07:00 AM |
| 3 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...The problem is a feature, not a bug. Contrary to the Greeks and Romans, who believed in keeping the glans covered to show sexual control, Philo argued that removing the foreskin was what allowed Jewish men even greater control over their sexual passions. But why circumcise only males? In a volume entitled Questions and Answers on Genesis, Philo’s answer is that ‘‘the male has more pleasure in, and desire for, mating than does the female, and he is more ready for it. Therefore Herightly leaves ou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:50 AM |
| 2 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Because your Jewish descendants will be doing Brit Shaloms. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:48 AM |
| 2 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Ask yourself what would make a Jewish man so confident and so livid that he would tear up the covenant for all Jews to get rid of circumcision: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc&t=7029s | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:44 AM |
| 2 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Not all circumcisions are the same. Some men lose more than others. Some keep the frenulum and can achieve orgasm, though maybe prone to PE because it’s exposed. Some men without frenulums feel nothing and need a tight death grip to stimulate the corpus cavernosum, the sensitive hard part inside penises. If they have been colorblind since birth, they can’t claim they’ve been robbed the pleasure of full color spectrum. Sounds cruel to me. r/circumcisiongrief r/foreskin_restoration | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:37 AM |
| 1 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Nice dodge of the religious reason that makes it so culty: You can’t truly be one of us until you undergo this hazing ritual of permanently marking your genitals. I got in a discussion with a Jewish man who was adament that r/JewsAgainstMilah can’t be real Jews and can’t practice Judaism if they do not circumcise. He was that adament about it being a yes or no thing to be a Jew. Check my post history if you’re interested. Another reason that makes me think it’s a bit culty thing to do is have th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:33 AM |
| 3 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...It’s not “feel”, it’s “know”. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/rvl1fb/most_american_women_are_into_mutilated_men_and/hr6eaq6/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:18 AM |
| 3 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Circumcision is prescribed and promoted in America because American doctors are studying medical literature that omits the foreskin: https://youtu.be/SB-2aQoTQeA?t=26m22s You are better off asking the original bronze age goat herders that came up with circumcision for any “health” benefits. They just wanted to cut ya in the dick as a hazing ritual to be part of their tribe forever. Is circumcision genital mutilation being promoted in a cult like way by the followers who think they were hand chos… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 06:13 AM |
| 8 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Some men become incapable of orgasm. And some men differentiate between orgasm and ejaculation. Sure, I can listen to a Mozart symphony without the entire violin section, but why hamper my enjoyment of the experience by needlessly taking away entire sections - the ridged band, frenulum, frenular delta, inner foreskin. Knocking on lower sensitivity is like saying it's bad to be less ticklish. No it's like saying when someone licks my dick I prefer to feel it. https://archive.md/13nVW | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 05:46 AM |
| 0 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...As an intact man in a cutting culture, after having learned of the ridged band and frenulum, I wouldn’t consider any woman with a mutilated genital fetish to be an “opportunity”. Would you consider a man with a similar fetish to be even considerable in the first place? These women are pre-emptively deciding for their sons that they will have insufficient self-esteem to tell off a woman with a fetid fetish and instead will submit to their fetish with cucking their genitals of sensation, pleasure,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 05:38 AM |
| 2 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Some men have more balls than others and put their children above culture/traditions that will harm them: https://archive.md/DgDfY One American Jew is tearing Yahweh a new one for his covenant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc&t=7029s | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...I won't have sex with half working penises ever again That's why it's so alien to me that women are there with their labia that can look like smoked meat, complaining the mere presence of a body part with functions is problematic Based. I can’t think of a more submissive, whipped act than men being deemed mentally incapable of hygiene and need tissue from their genitals amputated rather than clean them like women, as well as to satiate these very same women’s fetish for altered genitals. It’s pr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 05:27 AM |
| 19 | Most American women are into mutilated men, and all that it implies...Shittier orgasm, immobile skin, masturbation not worth the effort, etc. It varies depending on how much skin was removed and what parts were kept intact. Science has proven that circumcision removes the five most sensitive parts of the penis: https://i.redd.it/jbpvyi1wizf21.jpg https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 "The inner surface, the under surface of the foreskin is probably one of the most heavily innervated parts of the human body." - https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0?t=1766 [NSFW] The … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/22 05:19 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter