TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhipIash Archive

View 3 posts and 565 comments by WhipIash on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I thought we had gotten away with debtors' prison...
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:25 PM
-8

Yeah, at fourteen. Of course they don't know it's wrong, no one is born with that kind of knowledge, they have to be told. Their parents obviously failed, but there is still hope for them as individuals.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:12 PM
8

Because then they'll become an even bigger problem for society. At least give them a chance to adapt.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:52 PM
2

Well hi there, Marshall.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:47 AM
1

As for your last paragraph, how is that?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:20 PM
1

Sure, that all sounds great! I'm just saying, let's get rid of affirmative action all together.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:39 PM
0

Yeah, exactly, spread that money out! Grants for those who deserve it, regardless of gender!
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:24 PM
1

You want affirmative action for men?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:54 AM
42

Yes, damned be affirmative action, no matter which way it swings.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:53 PM
0

Lower barrier of entry. A reason to initiate conversation.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:22 PM
1

Thanks, that's exactly how I feel. I'd be screwed had I went to an all boys' school.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:20 PM
1

That's very good for you, but it's easy to imagine already shy boys building up women and putting them on a pedestal, isn't it? Some girls might do the equivalent too. I'm not saying it's a universal truth, but public school certainly might help some people get out of their shell, or at least keep them from building one up.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 11:31 AM
-8

A thirteen year old boy walking up to a girl he doesn't know to.. do what?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:47 PM
-7

No, that's what I'm saying, what other than media is there if you don't have the chance to be around girls until 18 - 19 years old?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:11 PM
-14

Yes, being able to converse with the entire human species as opposed to half of it, is incredibly important.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:10 PM
-7

I'm not saying it's true for all guys, but it's certainly the logical conclusion for many.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:09 PM
-13

Where? How?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:08 PM
-21

I believe you articulated my point better than I did! If someone hasn't had the chance to have a conversation with a woman before the age of 18 - 19, don't you think they would've a very messed up image of what that entails? All they would have to go by is its depiction in media, which isn't very good. They'd think talking to a woman was just that, talking to a woman, a magical thing different from talking to people.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:22 PM
-19

Sure, but is it a good thing? I know I probably wouldn't even be able to talk to women had I not been forced to be around them during school. Forced isn't even the right word, I had the opportunity. Even if I wanted, how would I go about doing that at that age?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:38 PM
1

<sup>It's not goofy looking. :(</sup>
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:42 PM
1

Oh man, that's some terrible self esteem issues. :/ Goofy looking, as in non-circumcised, or goofy looking as in can't-pull-the-foreskin-back?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:31 PM
1

Why do you think you wouldn't have gotten laid?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:59 PM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:58 PM
2

Uh... is this condom-less sex we're talking about, because, with, uh, works fine. In my experience.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:17 AM
2

Was it severe? Did you attempt other treatments? Was this long ago?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:25 PM
6

That's usually not treated with circumcision any more, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:50 PM
6

Uh, I think your sarcasm detector might be broken...
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:12 PM
2

What kind of medical condition did you have? Also, why do you hate it, besides the weird piece of skin?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:08 PM
0

Not quite as hilarious, but still pretty inventive.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:49 PM
3

That's also the most hilarious argument for pro life.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:54 PM
1

The judge cried? What, when?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:18 PM
2

I watched the entire video, but doesn't that just make Nevada's laws and legislations ridiculous? There were no mentions of her past.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:11 PM
5

I think there might be some backwards correlation and causation here.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:20 PM
4

I don't see the logical connect there, but oh well.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:59 PM
2

That's completely ridiculous, I don't think anyone is complaining it's heavy lifting (figuratively), I think it's more a thing of annoyance that you have to think about it at all. I still don't get it though, because as I said, I automatically move it just as automatically as I unbutton my pants or turn around to sit down.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:57 AM
42

I've actually done the maths on this in the past when it was brought up on reddit, because it pisses me off. Assuming everyone uses the toilet for number one and number two at a rate of 70% and 30%, respectively, by everyone leaving it the way they used it, men already do more work than women! This is also assuming putting it up and putting it down is equal amounts of work. This, though, I am completely fine with, because what the fuck. At times I find myself reaching for the seat when it's alre…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:19 AM
2

As for your first quote, that's a bad translation. The 'service' is in reference to serving in the military, aka being drafted. She's saying that shouldn't be mandatory, which I agree with. And in reality, it isn't. I wasn't drafted, mostly due to a lack of motivation.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:13 PM
2

It's actually quite easy to not get drafted. I'm seventeen, and I recently had to fill out the form about physical fitness and motivation. Needless to say, I didn't get drafted. Yay.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:11 PM
31

Let's all do that.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:55 AM
6

Are they illegal to carry around?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:48 AM
9

That is.. a brilliant retort.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:13 PM
5

Non-mobile link.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 08:15 PM
1

Well sure, if someone of legal age forced them. Not sure what would happen if the underage person held a gun to your head... actually that's kind of an interesting question.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:16 PM
1

I'm not saying I agree, but following the literal law, the 15 year old can describe in court how much she enjoyed it in terrifying detail and you're still accountable for rape. Exactly because the 15 year old isn't old enough to consent.. her consent doesn't count, so it's presumed unconsensual (is that a word?) from their side.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:14 PM
0

I'm not entirely sure if you're being facetious or not, but no matter how you twist and turn it, an underage person cannot rape someone not underage. A grown man legally can't claim rape from a 15 year old girl. Doesn't matter if the girl says she wanted it, he's still legally the rapist.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:29 AM
41

Not just that, but she was asked if she was consenting. What the...
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:05 PM
51

This is the most depressing comment I've read all day.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:07 PM
1

Well fuck, how do you know what the right thing is?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:58 PM
3

I actually agree with you, but do you have any examples on the The closer I became with my dad the easier life seemed to be because I could see how I was suppose to handle things. thing? I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:55 AM
3

You've got it one hundred per cent backwards. If they were discussing women's issues (even be it perceived ones, who are we to judge) it would be okay, but if they're only doing programming I don't see how it's fair to exclude men.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:27 AM
5

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:10 AM
3

Yes, and I want to help white people learn programming.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:41 PM
2

Is her name really Donglegate?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:41 PM
4

Uh... Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:40 PM
1

I have no clue who Dennis is, sorry.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:04 PM
1

Which is why, I suppose, I didn't ask how old you were, I asked your age!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:41 PM
1

Ten or a hundred would both work, sure. It's just an expression, though.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:14 PM
7

What is your age (within an order of magnitude at least)?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:14 PM
2

Crap, I can't for the life of me remember where this is from.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:55 PM
2

Well then.. fuck.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:11 PM
1

He can still claim they didn't have intercourse.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:53 AM
-2

But he didn't have sex with her?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:26 PM
1

Underachieve, huh?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:34 AM
5

Shit, what does being without a father do to you?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:08 PM
6

Well I agree, but: either you don't understand what feminism really stands for, or you're bat shit crazy.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:07 AM
3

But you linked a statistic?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:06 AM
-2

Implying you're hit on all the time? Edit: I wasn't trying to mean, but I doubt any guy get hit on that often.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:18 AM
5

Isn't that just periodic realism, though?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:23 PM
10

I don't know, but I guess it's the fact no one seemed to call 911. Double standards, I suppose.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:15 PM
1

Combating racism like that is racist, but I suppose the combating is a good thing.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:06 AM
1

I don't know, is it? I don't know the law. But why wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:10 PM
1

Wait, is there a reason the judge shouldn't have allowed it? (Allowed it to be used as evidence I mean, not necessarily good evidence)
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:38 PM
3

No, no, it was totally my fault.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:12 PM
3

I'm sorry, that was just a shitty attempt at being funny.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:05 PM
-1

They were all friends with you.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:44 PM
3

I think I see a pattern.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:48 PM
2

How do you know so many people who tried and or succeeded in offing themselves? I know exactly none.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:34 PM
1

What's up with capitalizing the Internet? Actually curious.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:31 PM
6

Yes, she should be punished as well. I don't think it's as misleading as you think.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:29 PM
2

Which would've made him an even bigger dipshit. Of course he was wrong in poking a whole in it.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:49 PM
8

Yes, no one is arguing he should be able to do that, what the hell.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:47 PM
9

What was actually funny...
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:24 PM
27

But think about the karma.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:07 PM
4

Presumably your current girlfriend is aware of your messy house? Or has it actually gotten clean?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:56 AM
1

I think he meant to write: everyone white knights the fuck out.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:00 PM
1

It can't even be that. If he thought it was sarcasm he would've seen it as misandric.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 01:07 PM
5

That doesn't make it any more, nor less, heart breaking, though. What are you going to do, stop people from getting divorced? Of course we could aim for a more fair parenthood deal, but that would just shift a lot of those kids' answers from 'dad' to 'mum.'
/r/MensRights25/12/12 12:43 AM
1

Yes, it does imply that only men are capable of rape, but it doesn't imply who they are raping with their penises, it might as well be other dudes.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:36 PM
4

To be fair, her tweet didn't imply that in the slightest.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:11 AM
21

It wasn't even bad timing. It was a perfectly normal opportunity to hit on her. She just didn't want that, but how could he have known without asking?
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:51 PM
14

Wait, why is she getting custody when you have the house and the means to raise a kid, and she clearly doesn't?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:56 PM
10

How does that even happen? Can't he prove he isn't making that much money? Assuming he's paying taxes he can definitely show how much he's made in the last year.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:49 PM
6

Waaait.. BRB, going to find my crowbar.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:50 PM
14

This, we do support it. But read the title / the comment in the image again. They tried making it about women, that's the point.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:54 AM
2

It's too mainstream to be old.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:03 PM
1

I sure hope so ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:46 AM
2

Just tag on "as well." at the end.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:38 PM
16

...it wouldn't have happened at all.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:05 PM
2

Which is ridiculous. No way in hell they can get back to society after that.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:21 PM
2

Yeah I remember reading about that. Still don't think eleven year olds deserve prison, like the rest of the (sane) world.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:50 PM
1

Yes?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:42 PM
-1

What is wrong with you? Prison, well, perhaps not in the ass backwards country of the US, isn't for punishment or revenge. Of course the father didn't deserve that. But I'm sure I did my share of fucked up shit when I was eleven, and I didn't know which was worse. Should I really be in prison still for what happened back then when I had no clue? It's just a matter of pure luck you're not locked up yourself. Are you really suggesting we imprison 11 year olds? Holy shit.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:32 PM
-2

Not really. If an 11 year old shot someone because they were playing with a gun or something, do they really deserve prison?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:48 AM
2

Not when they're committed by 11 year olds, imo.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:07 AM
-2

Did you read the outline part in the picture? It's not to get people to come forward admitting to lying, it's to scare off actual victims.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:04 AM
2

What the hell is ableism?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:34 PM
2

Ballet, for example, is a stereotypical girl's pursuit. What are you getting at?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:14 AM
41

What's the point of age of consent when consent is not even given?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:30 PM
52

Wow, I feel a slight sense of respect for... justing bieber. Wouldn't you know it.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:27 PM
2

So hands on molesting is fine? Pardon the pun, btw.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:58 AM
2

Lol, pussy man.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:55 AM
13

How is mother on son better?!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:12 PM
1

I guess that's not the case, but it's the way I feel. Which is odd.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:43 PM
3

I'm talking about five of these, forty years of age, slobbering over a teen movie.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:14 PM
10

There is a double standard in how it's perceived, though. It would be considered quite pathetic, really, for grown men to slobber over a young girl in a movie, like the women in the picture.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:44 PM
16

No one said they were rapey...
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:24 PM
4

If he did, what would happen in court if this video was shown? She clearly asks for a favour, and he complies. I wonder how the laws are in that regard.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:46 PM
8

That's a law? What the actual...
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:42 PM
1

But natural colours are okay?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:29 PM
2

Why would they ban hair dying? That sounds very illegal.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:25 PM
2

The top comment agrees with you...?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:39 PM
3

The most upvoted comment there, even though he / she realised it was a 'test', considers it a grey area, while the main consensues on /r/askmen was that it wasn't rape... it's just one person, of course, but still. It did get the most upvotes.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:36 PM
1

up...votes?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:31 PM
1

Well, that can technically happen, but it is impossible for the rapee to rape the raper, without stopping the raper from raping... if that makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:30 PM
2

This... is a very good point. It's not like it's hurting the state's revenue or monopoly either. And I know I've said in the past it's a victimless crime, but you really made me think. It is absolutely victimless, yet for some reason, the state cares. 1984 my ass, it's more like 2012.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:29 PM
1

Sure, whatever.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:53 PM
1

I need to do that...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:08 AM
3

Being cyberhacked is your greatest fear?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:03 AM
3

Wait, how did he get paid to lose his? No, I didn't read the article...
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:46 AM
1

If you substituted 'brilliant' with 'interesting' or 'sad' you don't need that sarcasm tag.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:45 AM
10

Man... get your URLs together.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:42 AM
3

Not tolerating intolerance isn't very tolerant.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:15 PM
0

Alright then...
/r/MensRights27/10/12 08:27 PM
1

Almost?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:57 PM
1

As I said, most. And even most countries not in the EU, but still part of the EØS trade agreement, will have to oblige to this particular regulation.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:18 PM
1

I'm also a bot.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:07 PM
1

Most countries in Europe are under EU regulations.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:58 PM
2

Yeah, it's not really difficult. Give the detainee the choice.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:32 PM
7

Wow... great fucking system.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:31 PM
2

Just so you know, it's just a bot...
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:55 AM
2

You should come to Europe. As of next year insurance premiums cannot be based on gender.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:52 AM
1

Very true. But what could you do, even if you tried?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:38 AM
1

I don't think you can call it 'being followed' if it's accidentally...
/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:28 AM
10

That's probably more annoying than re posts themselves, though.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:50 AM
0

Or that.. but you're stretching it.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:33 PM
-1

Stop discriminating against those poor girls and check your privilege. Geesh.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:49 AM
3

The intervening too late part is very true. But We need to pressure girls [...] so that they grow up to like math, science, SC and engineering. What about pressuring young boys to like poetry, literature, art, retail, fashion and textile?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:46 AM
1

Why don't they use the same logic towards male dominated areas?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:43 AM
3

I'm sorry, I don't see any logical reason why there shouldn't be as many female paedophiles, but seriously, citation needed.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:42 AM
7

Unless magically a bunch of very skilled women do join these fields, we'll end up with under qualified women taking qualified men's jobs... how do they not see this?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:38 AM
3

Well, how often do you see campaigns to get men interested in retail, sowing, writing, textile.. what ever you consider to be female dominated occupations. There aren't because no one cares if men go into these areas or not, and the few men who want in, generally go in.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:36 AM
2

I was actually addressing the gender issue.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:34 PM
2

I don't want to come of as some crazy anarchist, but that's what happens when you try to regulate millions of people after some arbitrary rules. It gets messy. "You see, I don't like this substance, and since I was voted to power by half the population for entirely different reasons I will throw everyone in jail for putting this substance in their bodies. Also I don't like cock, so I'm also going to throw any man who puts that in his body in jail as well."
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:24 PM
2

Can you elaborate on the sentencing guidelines? I haven't heard of those.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:28 PM
2

First of all, we're not so stupid as to not recognize sarcasm, and secondly, if you don't format your sarcasm tags properly it will throw an exception or you'll get an error.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:25 PM
3

Eh, the life expectancy thing might as well be biological.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:24 PM
2

But they didn't..? They pointed out men have it worse than women...
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:23 PM
6

Sticking a Q-tip in the baby's mouth would suffice ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:28 PM
6

In fact, everyone should do that.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:27 PM
4

Never forget!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:54 PM
1

You're the one advocating human rights.. why are you doing the exact thing you questioned in the OP?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:17 PM
13

Well this is certainly valid information.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:37 PM
1

Acting on it, of course. But I'm still not going to question them.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:30 PM
1

tl;dr? The way I see it though, it would be horrible if I told someone I got raped and they didn't believe me. If it's the police I'm telling, now that's a whole other story, but your friend? Come on.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:25 AM
1

This is very true. And very sad. But I hope I wouldn't assume it based on gender, I hope I'd assume it based on our friendship. Even just because believing a false rape claim is way better than not believing a real one (as far as emotional support from friends go).
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:39 PM
3

That's what I'm thinking too. Or something like it. The point is though, it doesn't really matter much if she was raped or not. As her friend, he should've worked under the assumption she was telling the truth, which he did.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:35 PM
2

Anyway, I don't even know why it was brought up. It seems rather stupid if you ask me. If one of my friends, or girlfriend, told me they'd been raped I probably wouldn't question that. At all.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:55 PM
6

I don't think the rape kit was negative, however it showed there wasn't forced penetration. Now, I'm no expert, but couldn't this be caused by him being.. eh, gentle, to her unconscious body?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:45 PM
19

This sounds surprisingly similar to the actual witch hunts...
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:44 PM
16

No one is arguing that. The woman should always have the choice to do what ever she wants with the baby, but she shouldn't expect the father to pay up.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:43 AM
1

I agree. But now we're talking about recounting the story. (Also, it would necessarily for the discussion be rape and attempted murder)
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:26 PM
6

I understand your point (sort of), but personally "There's the fucker who shot me" seems a lot better to say than "There's the guy who put his penis inside my anus without permission."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:04 PM
1

Oh yeah, I forgot, sexual harassment has a different meaning outside work...
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:03 PM
-2

I think 99% of that can be explained by the shame.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:40 PM
1

The thing is, though, you won't be taken seriously many places. And perhaps more importantly, is it really fair to file unwanted sexual advances as a complaint? How are you suppose to know if she wants it or not? "May I initiate 'sexual advance procedure'?"
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:22 PM
0

I can see that...
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:51 AM
1

I'm not talking full on slap, just a joking weak ass grab, like you might do with a mate.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:10 PM
0

Well, props to you. May I ask what the 'incident' was?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:09 PM
2

That's a big part of it, though. You have to fight every step of the way, including being taken seriously by management / your boss, coworkers, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:29 PM
0

If a woman were to jokingly slap my ass.. do you really think I could file a successful complaint?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:23 PM
2

This was 21 hours ago. Needless to say, I had forgotten it again.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:22 PM
0

I can with confidence say that it takes way less for a woman to be taken seriously with such claims, at least.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:45 AM
1

"But she touched me...!" That's not grounds for a sexual harassment claim. Yet apparently it is if you're female.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:39 AM
0

No, the man and the woman are supposed to be equally sick. How did you get that from the comic?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:06 PM
1

The first time I was referenced to one of his soap boxes I lost several hours.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:05 PM
4

Getting on my over-analyzing hat here: It's just representing her still caring for her family, while her outfit represents her professional work. /hatoff
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:04 PM
4

You think filing a sexual harassment complaint as a man would do any good?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:02 PM
5

I actually respect that. Personally, though, that sounds pretty damn boring.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:01 PM
28

I actually learned something on reddit today O.o
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:59 PM
9

I haven't read it. Could someone explain?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:14 PM
7

You handled that worse than I did at 4...
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:34 PM
5

At least remember to crack the window for it.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:13 PM
2

Holy fuck, people like this are parents?!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:04 PM
7

And it's not like it's a major issue either. My mum drove straight passed and forgot to pick me up at kindergarden once. She's a terrific mum, but she drove half way home before she realised I wasn't there.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:02 PM
3

I tried seeing the brightest side. I don't know man, I've never been in that situation.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:24 PM
2

Wow.. that sucks. Well, look at the bright side I suppose? You were unconscious? I dunno.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:31 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood then. So he does agree guilt tripping is assault?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:56 PM
-2

You agree it's a myth that people lie about sexual assault?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:38 PM
3

What?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:48 AM
2

I meant 'we' as in humans.. it was easier phrasing that that way. But that's fascinating. I guess we have too few kids and live way too long.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:48 AM
2

So we're not supposed to menstruate as much as we do?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:18 AM
2

Wait... completely OT, but.. do other animals menstruate? I've never seen a female cat bleed all over the place, but.. don't they have to?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:27 AM
2

Holy fuck that's ridiculous. That's beyond ridiculous...
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:39 PM
2

What was the context?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:19 PM
2

Someone should do the scene again with roles reversed and upload it to youtube and see what response it gets...
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:28 PM
9

No one noticed how he flipped 180 as soon as he read the same comment again?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:06 PM
24

*rimshot.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:10 PM
1

Yeah, but if it's a large number, i.e. 30 fucking thousand, then it's a damn conspiracy.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:08 PM
16

A what now?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:04 PM
8

Are you drowning or what?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:10 PM
2

That sounds weird. How can that be? Also, I suppose this is a good thing. It means there are more normal women per normal guy.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:36 PM
8

Are there really more paedophile men that women? I wonder why that is in that case.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:52 PM
4

Yeah, but it's like 99p.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:18 PM
6

He's being silly.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:59 PM
12

*Raped
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:32 PM
5

I don't know if you've seen this comment, but.. I thought you should see this comment.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:11 PM
9

But you would a man?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:03 PM
12

The massive emphasis on 'so' really made it look like you were being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:39 PM
7

Did you forget a question mark there
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:37 PM
8

How do people keep missing that?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:35 PM
4

Woohoo, misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:20 AM
1

Man that's horrible... I'm so sorry. Can I ask what happened to your boyfriend?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:19 AM
5

What's the reason you don't get along with women, you reckon? Also, what do you mean that they are all the same? This is quite interesting.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:29 PM
-1

Well... he doesn't know, does he?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:26 PM
10

To be fair, most women are quite normal...
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:24 PM
2

Damn.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:46 PM
0

Woow.. that's it, I'm not going over to you guys any time soon. Damn scary place. What if a judge just went bat shit crazy and gave someone life for stealing a potato?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:06 PM
-1

Maybe not in the US, but isn't that how it's supposed to work? I think your apathy is a huge part of the problem.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:09 PM
-1

That face though, is generally seen as a direct responce to the comment.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:03 PM
6

I'm sorry, is your sarcasm detector broken? I'm sure the warranty will cover it...
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:45 PM
14

But if I as a motorvehicle operator run someone over (kill a pedestrian in a traffic accident), even though I obviously never wanted to hurt, let alone kill anyone, I'll get sent to prison for manslaughter. Great.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:34 PM
23

Oh, well in that case...
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:32 PM
1

Well.. then the judge broke the fucking law and made an absurd ruling. Any judge can say that, but that doesn't make it legal. Your friend should've appealed. I'm quite sure the judge would've been fired if this got higher up.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:34 PM
-5

Stop circlejerking.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:33 PM
1

Yeah, you should've proof read your post... especially since you were critizicing OP.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:25 PM
2

That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:13 PM
1

What analogy about what? what?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:54 PM
1

What he described is commonly known as intellectual circlejerking.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:20 PM
2

I think you just described circlejerking...
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:05 PM
17

I think your sarcasm got picked up on, and that's not why you were downvoted.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:53 AM
1

So I take it they do the same for men in fields with loads of women?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:56 AM
2

Women get big bonuses for going to college, while men don't?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:54 PM
3

That's probably true.. but are you saying it's completely reasonable to ban men from sitting next to unaccompanied children?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:28 PM
-2

Hey, don't downvote the dude. He's probably a conservative who thinks bar owners and such should be able to discriminate against blacks if they so choose, as well. It's a legitimate, if stupid, opinion.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:27 PM
3

Wait, what.. are you saying men should not be able to sit next to unaccompanied children on airplanes?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:26 PM
1

Yes, why not? What's the worst that can happen? It's a plane.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:25 PM
11

Come to think of it.. there's a picture of me naked as a baby on the mantle. We have child porn in our living room O.o
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:23 PM
5

How exactly is using an accurately descriptive term degrading?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:21 PM
1

Have you ever actually seen that?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:19 PM
1

Actually, Zombie co-op with three other firends at a LAN is pretty fun. Also, nuketown. Jesus Christ nuketown is fun. Other than that, though...
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:23 PM
15

Even then. Then you're a motherfucking, niggerloving, pussylicking, faggotfucking hacker.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:18 PM
1

I just love how many, if not most, of the comments are basically "Poor guy. His dick was probably not even that small." I'll let you think out the rest of this comment.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:39 PM
1

How can people be this manipulative and destructive?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:36 PM
2

To be fair, anyone can be destructive. Bullying is destructive.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:35 PM
1

Which makes it a men's right issue. As well.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:34 PM
3

The fuck was wrong with him?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:26 PM
2

I didn't get it... Oxygen? What?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:12 PM
2

Do you remember what the definition was?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:11 PM
1

No one likes Stargate Universe apparently :(
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:00 PM
2

Don't know what's worse ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:47 PM
45

Stabbing in the neck could, by a long shot, be turned around to argue self defence. But she tied him up, for the love of god. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:19 PM
8

Hate crime is such bullshit. Crime is crime is regardless of motive (except self defense).
/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:02 AM
0

Yep, you are.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:38 AM
1

I guess the same would be true if it were a girl then?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:59 PM
1

Didn't you read the article? They had to pay as well, that's why the parents got so upset.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:26 PM
2

What ever happened to age of consent?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:25 PM
3

I'm pretty sure the title was sarcastic, so yeah, you should be even more enraged than usual.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:25 PM
2

... might?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:23 PM
0

Dude, it's just text. It's not like they're going to read through every link you clicked and read everything on that page...
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:52 PM
1

But this is text...
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:40 PM
-1

Yeah, that's why you shouldn't be on reddit... what's in that text is quite irrelevant.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:39 PM
-1

Wow, you could lose your job over this? I guess you guys are in the US or something?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:53 PM
1

Oh, yeah... actually, I do that too. I wish I didn't have to, though.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:40 PM
1

No, I'd say neither.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:53 PM
2

Oh, that makes sense. Believe it or not, that's what I use. It was like 10 bucks, why would I buy an iPad?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:38 PM
11

Also, men can be equally drunk.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:23 PM
1

I agree your last paragraph isn't a gender issue either, but you seriously need to act dumb to be liked? I think there's a problem there... .
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:22 PM
7

That is literally dangerously stupid.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:21 PM
3

Well, yeah, but you don't need to be a feminist to disagree with that.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:17 PM
-2

The fuck is an mp3? O.o Are you referring to the file format...? What?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:16 PM
3

...as expected. But yeah, I didn't hear about it either. Doesn't mean it wasn't huge, though.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:13 PM
1

Yeah, I read it. Stumbled a bit on that, to be honest. That doesn't sound so malicious to me.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:30 PM
2

Of course that's what it's about. And he didn't. At least there's not nearly enough evidence (considering there is literally none) to convict him. And that's what this is about. You're the one making it about whether you can potentially rape your wife. Of course you can, but that's not what this is about, so why are you making it about that?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 03:37 PM
2

How do you know he didn't have sex with his wife? He even said so himself.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:47 PM
7

Well that's too bad. I hope you didn't charge her with rape and possibly ruin her life because you were both drunk. My opinion really isn't affected by gender either way on this matter.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:42 PM
3

To be fair, I'm friends with quite a few morons I met during school... I just don't use facebook, really.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:58 PM
1

With that attitude, I really don't think so.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:17 PM
4

In that case, yes, most definitely.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:23 PM
1

That's actually quite brilliant. Wish someone told me that when I was learning English.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:06 PM
1

Well, no, I don't know what these are called in english, but they're there to help you remember the rule. Such as "i before e except after c" or whatever. (Yes, I know that's not correct, but you get the idea). Your sentences, although correct, were useless. Something useful for someone not remembering the difference might be "lose lost the o".
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:05 PM
1

I know the difference, but any of this isn't really helping those who don't.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 02:02 PM
5

You really believe they'd do that?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:18 PM
1

That's a shitty way to remember it though.. I mean, how is that any easier to remember than "If your pussy is lose, you might loose your boryfriend"?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:17 PM
2

FEM?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:16 PM
3

That was quite brilliant actually.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:15 PM
34

Light a man a fire, and he'll be warm the rest of the night. Light the man on fire, and he'll be warm the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:13 PM
23

If they weren't married... no way.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 01:12 PM
10

This would be really interesting.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:27 PM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:01 PM
3

His name is Einstein?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:25 AM
1

No, that's what it leads to about 50% of times. Google for sauce, it's the generally accepted statistic.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:16 AM
9

Probably not. There's no Shyamamamalana worthy ending. Mass forwarded emails usually have one of those. Oh, did I forget to mention, this fella turned out to be Einstein?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:12 AM
1

When I cook a great meal she usually unbuttons my pants.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:27 AM
6

Why doesn't anyone have the same response to these school massacres?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:04 AM
2

[...] especially : discrimination against women ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:59 AM
1

Ah, carry on then. I've never had a thing for platypuses, personally. Being a cat would be nice and dandy, though.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:05 PM
0

No, what he meant is that your genitals only shows what sex you are, not which gender.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:46 PM
2

For the nth time, we agree. We're not trying to censor the subreddit, we're just saying they're blatantly lying in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 10:06 AM
0

That's ridiculous, if she isn't more persistent than saying no, well then it's her fault. (Yes, by the mercy of god, I actually said it was the rape victim's fault!) I mean, if you go along with it, but change you're mind and all you do is say no, and don't follow that up, well that's as good as not doing anything. You have to (a) don't kiss, make out, flirt or do similar things to seriously lead him on at all or (b) after changing your mind after doing aformentioned things, put in a bit more ef…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:46 AM
1

I'm not saying it's not as serious, or that she shouldn't get just as hard a sentence, I'm just saying that a violent crime should remain specific for violent crimes. Because if you use this reasoning hate speech is a violent crime, hiring a hitman is a violent crime, and ratting someone out for shop lifting is a violent crime. Driving to fast would be a violent crime, or at least an attempt at one. You can name pretty much any crime and think of a way that might turn violent for someone down th…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:46 AM
2

Alright? I mean, yeah, I guess. But that's not the issue. The issue is to get him to realise you're not consenting. The problem now is that she can be playful and all that, but she can later claim he raped her because at some point during the evening she uttered the word "no". It's all about body language. No doesn't always mean no. But getting up and leaving and saying something of that effect in a harsh tone of voice always means getting up and leaving and saying something of that effect in a …
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:37 AM
-1

That's ridiculously stupid, dude. You're trying to change the motherfucking way we communicate.. with laws. That's never worked. Also, you're trying to tell two (or more(?)) consenting adults what they can and cannot do. If we could all just agree that if a woman wants to get the point across, she will, then there would be no problem. Instead of asking "did you say no", ask "were you clear that you did not want this and then attempted to leave". If no, then how the fuck is the guy supposed to kn…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:33 AM
2

Well, to get a point across it's a little excessive. But to stop someone raping you? I think a slap is more than fine. I mean, wouldn't you punch a guy in the groin if he was raping you, if that's what it took? Of course this is usually in a situation when the guy knows he's raping you. If the guy just think you're being playful, a slap is indeed too far. If he just thinks you're being playful, it's just a matter of getting up and leaving.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:20 PM
0

And that's sort of the point, isn't it? No doesn't always mean no. But sometimes it does. It's.. ambiguous.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:16 PM
1

No, it wouldn't work for hiring a hitman. You could be held accountable for murder, perjury and so on, but not violence. And I'm not saying she shouldn't get the same sentence, I'm just saying we shouldn't call it a violent crime, when it clearly isn't.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 02:35 PM
1

A little more context would be great, though...
/r/MensRights04/07/12 02:27 PM
-11

Wait... she swore on the bible? I'd have no problem lying, and I assume most of you wouldn't either. That's like swearing on Harry Potter. I apologize for my blasphemy. Let's say "any book", then.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:50 AM
19

Wait, what? It wasn't a violent crime, now was it. It was a serious crime, but it was in no way violent. Let's stick to the facts here guys.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:50 AM
-3

He was lucky he even had to shit.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:38 AM
-1

That's hilarious. But also a serious dick move. But then again, also hilarious.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:22 AM
7

The two previous posts were blatant sarcasm without a tag, and then you come along with entire words in upper case, exclamation marks and a bunch of question marks. I think you'll be fine.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:20 PM
11

No, no, no. This was so subtle I almost missed it, but: "[...] they don’t have enough energy or personality to keep them entertained." When did it become our job to entertain women 24/7?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:10 PM
7

Yeeaah, that didn't really need the sarcasm tag.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:07 PM
2

The time limit is in that case very important... if he loses in court now, does he have to pay those 25000 for the rest of his life, or what? I didn't see anything about it in the article.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:44 PM
5

Also, why should he give her anything?! She survived on her own before meeting him.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:30 PM
11

Wait, they were never married? HOLY MOTHER OF FUCKING JESUS CHRIST! TURTLE!
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:28 PM
1

Wait, didn't they say we were killing the music industry?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:27 PM
1

I think it's also important that only a relatively small percentage of students learn best the way schools are set up now. It may very well be that most of those benefiting from today's system are girls, but that's really not the issue.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 02:32 PM
1

Doesn't sound like him, I me- yeah, never mind.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:59 PM
1

I don't know if this has anything to do with being an only child, but much like you, I enjoy being alone. In fact, I despise most people. They are the most uninteresting, stupid and quite frankly, ungrateful, people to ever exist. Why do I have to suffer with these morons?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:28 PM
1

Wait, what? If you're seeing this, intelligent as you appear to be, and you have the god damned chance to do something about it, why the fuck don't you?! I wish I was taught this in school, and there's absolutely no moral ground you can stand on and willfully mislead children. Tell them the truth. Please.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:07 AM
1

I think so. I imagine having siblings only makes you a more angry / cynical person.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:06 PM
1

Why don't you just tell the kids this? I mean, the truth. Also, MLK did that? The more I know...
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:03 PM
2

I'm an only child as well, but it's never even occurred to me to blame my slight social awkwardness on it.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:56 PM
1

Realise, sceptic, colour, honour, humour, armour, paedophile (apparently) are just a few odd ones off the top of my head. I should really start writing British.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:18 PM
7

That's probably a more accurate description.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:16 PM
1

I like how you spell paedophile, is that a British thing?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:20 PM
17

It's innocent until proven guilty. Except in sexual harassment / violation cases.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 03:56 PM
12

I'm not entirely sure why you posted this OP, but I get the feeling it's the obvious point in the title, that we should protect boys the same way we do girls. However, I'm more concerned with how we overprotect girls, and in the process, alienate, almost criminalize, and label every man a pedophile.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:45 PM
2

About the pedophilia thing, I've heard there's about just as men female pedophiles... but that might just be my shoddy memory.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:42 PM
20

Also, men lose fathers and sons in battle too, not only women. A few lose husbands or wives too.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:29 AM
1

Wow what happened? This was like a month ago.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:55 AM
-1

She was way out of line saying that. I don't know why she did it, but it appears to me she just did it in search of greater sympathy.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:15 PM
-1

No, not at all. Her comment is out of line, labeling herself as a 'survivor'.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:42 PM
1

Is it just me or did she in fact not have the authority to do that, even though she claimed she did? Not too familiar with US laws, but my understanding is that police need more than reasonable doubt to do such a search. I mean, it's in the fucking constitution, am I not right?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:11 PM
-1

What?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:45 PM
-2

I was just commenting on the general "I'm a rape survivor" thing. This also goes for other non-lethal surviving.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:33 PM
2

Holy fuck that is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:11 PM
1

I think our justice system has just become too complicated with too many laws. No matter what you do, it's illegal one way or the other. No matter what the police do, they can excuse it / it's legal one way or the other.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:26 PM
1

If I were a girl I could just claim every male I hate tried raping me ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:23 PM
-3

I will retract my statement if she was raped at gunpoint or they held a knife to her throat.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:22 PM
1

Well this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:18 PM
2

There probably are a lot of people men in jail because of this. My dad went through this same shit. It took a year back and forth in court for them to finally drop the case. Luckily the woman is now in a mental institution, though. I'm from Norway, btw.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:40 PM
2

Unconvicted rapist? That sort of sounds like you really did rape her but you were never convicted. The actual fuck?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:37 PM
0

*Put your dick in crazy. Not for science, but to avoid false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:29 PM
-5

Really? Really? I agree with you, but really? You're not a survivor unless you actually were under real danger of death. Am I a survivor for surviving my drive to work today? Hell no, even though I probably had tougher odds of surviving than a rape victim. You're cheapening everything real survivors go through.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:28 PM
1

They can search you without reasonable doubt in big cities? I really don't think/hope that's the law here in Norway...
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:24 PM
2

They will use what in what court? You think they might use this allegation against you if you ever end up in trouble in the future?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:21 PM
4

Apparently, when it comes to rape, it's guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:16 PM
2

Well, as much as I agree with you, I'd have to say there are some degrees. I'd much rather die a quick death, than a long painful one. And speeding is wrong, but I'd say it's a tad less wrong than visciously murdering a 100 infants.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 12:30 AM
1

Holy fuck, I didn't catch the beginning. I only clicked the tab from where she gave him the pepsi max. Also, I think you mean > 5 calories.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:45 PM
1

The ad is really, but it's all about movies. It's got nothing to do with the ridiculous statistic, does it?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:45 PM
1

Yes, I'm sure. But 1 in 4? Really?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:44 PM
3

The ridiculous claim and the green arrow (the movie ad) were two very different things.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:43 PM
1

The last one wasn't that bad, now was it?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:42 PM
3

I meant upper class women, for sure.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:37 PM
11

Oh, wow, yeah. I obviously meant be in a rich female's shoes in that era.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 12:50 AM
-3

Invented by men? Is it just me or are you saying men are superior to women?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:05 PM
10

You're clearly misunderstanding him on purpose. Everyone in all of your pictures, including his, were posing. That wasn't the issue. The issue is that these girls were mainly working in factories on textiles and such. The boys were working in the mines.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:03 PM
5

HEY! He wasn't saying they weren't children. They are children. But none of them are girls, that's what he's saying. Look at it this way: all the children are boys.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:01 PM
12

This is an immensely educational and interesting thread. Upvotes for you all!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 09:57 PM
7

It must've been quite bad, though. Imagine how boring it would've been. But I'm lazy by default, so I'd much rather be a woman.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 09:55 PM
1

Why would anyone do all that on purpose?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:26 PM
1

It isn't?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:37 PM
8

How is this not molestation? On a less serious note.. oh my, a thumb? I wish I was wielding that kind of artillery.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 10:27 PM
2

You couldn't link us directly?
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:04 PM
2

So true. Yet, there has to be some elements we recognize, else why would we watch?
/r/MensRights09/06/12 12:31 AM
4

Yes, because of TV.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 10:49 PM
10

I've noticed the same thing. But I don't think a normal, gay dude would be as fun on TV.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:34 PM
3

I thought the same thing.. guessing no, though. Not that it matters at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:33 PM
12

Damn that's a good name. Also, add in the part where she's lesbian if she doesn't approve.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:32 PM
11

You're not helping.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:32 PM
1

What is it? Hoe does it affect one?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:54 AM
1

I'm speechless...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:53 AM
3

Sadly, he actually understands it perfectly.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:52 AM
2

Yeah, I know how horrible the pain is, but it's still funny when some kid bats their dad in the nuts on AFV. On the other hand, if someone were to do it on purpose, it would be whole other thing. (In real life, that is).
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:21 PM
1

Alright, hit her with the same force she hit you, but you get the idea.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:18 PM
1

Shouldn't it also be 'a man should never hit a weaker man', and 'a strong woman should never hit a weaker man', and so on and so forth? The truth is, no matter what your size and strength, if you attack someone, they should be able to fight back. The only exception should be children, namely because they don't know what they're doing. But if a woman is attacking you, go ahead, hit her with all you've got.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:02 AM
1

Yeah, of course, we're all in favour of equality. Not just equality for men, in the same way feminists are for equality for women.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:59 AM
3

I do this too. If people fall and hurt themselves I'll laugh as well. But if they fall and die in the most horrible way imaginable, I'll probably not. It's this distinction these women fail to see. Ninja edit: I don't laugh at people like a douche, it's more of a 'holy shit man, are you okay? That was hilarious, dude'.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:56 AM
1

You see, this I can laugh at.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:55 AM
3

Well I don't really mind the 'hit in the groin' thing, for some reason I find that funny too. However, the 'The Talk' women you are referring to are total and utter horse shit and should be shot in the face with a twelve gauge.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:51 AM
1

I hate it when they delete their posts... anyone remember what he said?
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:47 AM
1

This is certainly something that should be considered. However, if you show a girl a bunch of men, and most are considered below average, then that's very weird and indeed interesting.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:05 AM
1

This is exactly what I thought. But the thing is that they were asked to rate guys regarding to their own idea of what is average, and that's the interesting part, since most guys fall below that. That's what this study shows, and it's what we are complaining about.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:26 PM
1

True, if there were a few really handsome people in the study. But I get the feeling this study was more like; "is this man below average attractive, just average, or more so?", and 80% ended up being below average. If not, then the study has no place being here.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:16 PM
3

Which would imply that the average move sucks balls. Or you're saying that an average movie has the score of 7/10, but that means most movies are pretty good. Thus and average movie is quite good. But you can't say the average move is below average, because then.. well you see the stupidity.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 04:01 PM
1

The guy below me is right, the average that makes the most sense in this context is the median. The more widely used average that you're thinking about, though, I can't seem to remember the name of.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:59 PM
8

So 80% of men are below average? Yeah, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 02:02 PM
2

In this case, yes.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 02:52 PM
7

Oh, never mind then. But that's how it goes, isn't it? The accused man (usually for rape and such) is 'leaked' to the media immediately, but the accuser remains anonymous.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 02:39 PM
2

What? No one is disputing that?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 02:26 PM
-2

Then I know what I'll be when I grow up. A captain of a large cruiser. When I get to international waters, I'll kill anyone I don't like with a chainsaw, then have my way with the women! :D Yay.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:56 PM
1

You mean, if they were kidnapped after they left US waters, but the rape occurred before hitting international waters?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 12:14 PM
4

You bring a good point. But if they were in international waters and kidnapping is okay, then what the hell, the men can't be prosecuted for rape either. However, if the ship is still technically still US soil, then kidnapping isn't okay either. God damn double standards.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 12:07 PM
7

Actually, it's still kidnapping. Even if a doctor on the ship could definitely prove she was raped by someone, and even if there were video showing them doing it, the ship's crew have absolutely no authority to hold them against their will. Maybe, maybe, if there were video proof, you could claim it as a justified citizen arrest, but holding someone just based on a claim is just horrendous.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 09:03 AM
6

So the fools deserve to die?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:52 AM
0

Well of course that would be rape, and of course non-consensual sex is always rape, regardless of penetration. But it isn't to legal system, which is what we are discussing here.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:16 AM
7

What?! How come a 14 year old boy's consent counts, but not an underage girl's?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 05:13 PM
-2

It's technically not rape since he wasn't penetrated. But it's molestation. EDIT: I'm not entirely sure why I'm getting downvoted for citing US law. I don't agree, I'm simply telling the (uncomfortable) truth.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:32 PM
0

Nevertheless, it's still the law.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:30 PM
54

Alriiight, let me see if I get this straight. A 30-something woman can tie down a fourteen year old boy, jerk him off, use his sperm to get pregnant, and he still has to pay child support?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 12:06 AM
3

As I said, I didn't make this so I don't know, but I'm pretty sure the last panel was not meant to be read...
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:46 AM
2

Yeah... or maybe they'll actually make it fair.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 10:44 AM
2

Oh by the way, I didn't make this. Someone posted it on facebook and I thought I'd share.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 12:22 AM
3

Shouldn't it also be 'never hit a sir', then?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:14 PM
7

I hate cops as much as the next guy, but if this is true, I wholly support this cop in his actions.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:11 PM
4

Eh... It might be just because I live in a small town, but I can walk around all hours of the day (or night for that matter) without worrying about.. well, anything. However, I do get your general point.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 04:44 PM
1

What the hell? This is exactly my point, a lot of people take pills for all sorts of reasons; allergies, headaches, migraines, and probably a lot of other innocent things.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:39 AM
1

Well, so what? Everyone's got their issues.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:16 AM
-1

So you have a flesh eating bacteria in your stomach...? I certainly wouldn't judge anyone for that.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:47 PM
1

Is that... Sam and Niko I see in the background?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:43 PM
1

AAh....
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:09 PM
2

Why is this rule even there? It's not like anyone is going to sneak in anything in a bag if they can easily do it in a purse.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:50 PM
1

Eh, what? Could you please elaborate or clarify for us foreigners?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:47 PM
-3

Well, even though I sympathize, you could just say they were medication. Or is taking anything for anything weird?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:46 PM
2

Wow, that's just crud. I can understand the first one though, I'd much rather have a male nurse the other way around.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:38 PM
3

What do they do / say?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:00 PM
1

That is so cool.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:48 PM
3

This is also a valid point.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 04:34 PM
2

Hey, I'm totally with you. I'm from a country where circumcision is totally unheard of, both male and female, and I love my foreskin. Ironically, no one will punch a baby in the face, but mutilation is okay. Nevertheless, if given the choice, I'd probably punch my kid before circumcising him. Not only because circumcising is permanent, but punching is also probably less painful.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:54 PM
0

To be fair it does sound kind of painful. But yes, MGM should obviously be illegal as well.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:52 PM
1

What the hell? Pin prick? Could you elaborate on this a bit?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:26 PM
7

No, the main reason for MGM is so you can't masturbate as easily. How is not having a foreskin more sanitary?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:22 PM
1

Yeah, that's how it should work.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:03 AM
1

I can't answer that, but if he's payed for it, it's certainly not fair that you get to keep it.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:02 AM
2

I wouldn't want to pay her at all. When the relationship stops, the money stops.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:01 PM
1

Somewhat a good idea.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:59 PM
1

No, she should pay child support. But that's about it. He should also get custody, but the house, car and everything else is still her's.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:58 PM
1

Yeh. But we're too lazy to do it ourselves? Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:42 PM
3

No. What needs to be done is that both parents are somewhat equally raising their bloody child. Everyone doesn't need a fancy education and a law degree.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:41 PM
1

That's true... . But still, god damn, someone needs to do something about it.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:31 PM
0

But.. put yourself in the shoes of the working spouse. After studying 24/7 for several years, they're left with a dead end job and no salary (because the other spouse gets it all). How is that any more fair?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:21 PM
2

But... why would anyone not sign a prenup, knowing that after going to school and working endless hours, in the event of a divorce they would have absolutely nothing left. And possibly be homeless. See, it works the other way around, and it's just as bad.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:19 PM
5

Yeah, I'm sort of used to a proper justice system where I come from... It's great! But I still get frustrated on your behalf when I read shit like this.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:47 PM
2

Why would you pay the ex? Child support I can understand, though.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:42 PM
6

Well.. First of all, thank you for typing that out and explaining it. But wouldn't signing a prenup solve all of this?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:40 PM
12

That doesn't seem.. fair.. in any way.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:04 PM
11

But how could a lawyer argue that in court? I mean, what the fuck? They have no connections any more, and because they were married once doesn't mean he has to support both himself and her for the rest of their lives, now does it? Or does it? As I said, I'm not too familiar with american laws or marriage.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:18 PM
6

So.. she got custody, and that's why you have to pay child support? I'm not up to speed on american law, but that doesn't seem too bad.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:16 PM
1

God damn, that's stupid. I mean the bias judge and lawyer part. Jesus fucking christ we should just nuke the entire US.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:14 PM
7

But then why does it appear as if the man has to pay the woman after they're divorced? I don't get it...
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:09 PM
20

Alright, I'm not familiar with american laws, so someone needs to explain this to me. What possible argument could the lawyer have to make you pay for her?! This also includes why in the name of all that is holy you have to pay for her lawyer... please, someone.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:07 PM
-4

Well, admittedly, it is a tiny bit creepy. But if no one asked anyone to join them for "coffee" at 4 am, the entire species would die out! Should he have said "I find you attractive, do you wish to attempt intercourse some point in time?"? NO! They had been chatting for hours in a group, he thought they hit it off, and on the way back he asked if she'd join him for coffee, god damn it. If this isn't the situation to be suggestive, when the fuck is?!
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:46 PM
-1

I can't remember, but someone can probably dig up the video somewhere. I could too, if you give me some time, I'm kinda swamped. So if any of any of you redditors out there with too much time on your hands don't mind...?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:23 PM
0

It's of course not the same. But strange, never the less. "You interest me, want to grab a coffee and talk some more?" "Get away from me, you creepy bastard!"
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:31 PM
0

I don't know. I don't even want to get into that debate because I have no clue either way. I just remember that woman being utterly pissed because a guy asked her out for coffee.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:13 AM
-5

Can't think of a criminal charge, but remember the lady in the elevator a while back? Yeh..
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:30 AM
2

You're a wonderful human being. I just wanted to say that.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:21 AM
14

That's so true, I would totally buy a women's ticket.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:41 PM
-1

I wanna see more of this...
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:32 PM
1

That is pretty much how politics in the US works. Not so much here, though. But it still sucks.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:47 AM
2

Off I go then.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:15 AM
1

Mine too did that, but always very lazily. A few red lines, a comment or to saying "good" or "you should work on this in the future" and then the all important grade.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:14 PM
3

I'd say the former. But this is exactly why I'm opposed to the grading system in general. Why objectively grade students instead of giving them actual real life feedback. I know how much of a punch to the stomach an unexplained C or D is. It fucking sucks.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:49 PM
1

Exactly what the other person said. Logically you're right. But I have no trouble seeing a teacher having a vendetta with a former student (father or mother of current student).
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:51 PM
1

What.. why? I don't quite understand.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:21 PM
3

That's a weird rule.. What if you've had an altercation in the past or you don't like their parents for personal reasons? But to this day I just can't fathom why the other teachers didn't want to do it. I was never really told why.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:17 PM
50

I wanted anonymous tests last year for the mock exams because I had a feeling one of my teachers didn't like me much. My contact teacher thought this was a good idea (didn't really say my motivation outright) and agreed it would be very easy to just issue every student a number or code (the tests were handed in digitally, i.e. we wrote on computers for the assignment). However, every single teacher, more or less, opposed this. For some weird reason, they wouldn't grade us without knowing who's e…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:36 PM
1

I'm not literally apologizing if it's not necessary. But I'll admit when I'm wrong. Not sure what we were originally discussing though, I'll have to go back up and see.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:21 AM
1

No, that's when I apologize, smartass.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:39 PM
1

Software engineering it is then! Actually, I've always figured that, because unless I get into indie-level game making, it's very specialized. I'd probably end up texturing models or doing some walk cycle animations or what not. I like doing everything, it's all really fun, from making the model, texturizing, rigging and animating, to programming.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:07 PM
1

From what (little) I've experienced, it's the god damn networking that's the difficult part.. Also, are you suggesting software development is better payed..? Thanks for the subreddits, by the way. I'll give them a try.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:52 PM
1

Yeah it probably is. Pfrus, maybe I'll have to move to the US. I do quite a bit of programming myself, mainly games as well. Assuming you own an android device, it would mean a lot to me if you checked out an app I wrote :D Did I mention? I'm 16.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:46 PM
-1

Couldn't give less of a shit about karma. Aslo, I stand by what I say. Unless I don't, in which case I'll apologize.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:37 PM
1

Yeah, I am the same way myself.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:29 PM
2

Still sarcasm or what? I fucking hate text.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:23 PM
0

I'm not fucking representing the men's right movement.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:45 PM
1

I cannot believe my disclaimer was not strong enough. AGAIN, DO NOT CLICK IT WITH AUDIO ON AND ESPECIALLY IF WEARING HEADPHONES
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:40 PM
5

Pretty much :p
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:57 AM
7

Why I want equal rights... Oh my, I wonder.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:36 AM
2

It depends.. what do you do? Also, we speak English you know. And you could always learn Norwegian.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:27 AM
2

Surprising someone in the US even know we exist o.O It's not that it matters whether you settle in Sweden or here. You can literally walk across the border whenever you want (assuming you live near the border, of course) and we speak so similar languages the dialects within Norway are sometimes harder to understand and more obscure than swedish. And your description is pretty accurate. We have it pretty great. Fantastic, actually. Only problem is a new legislation brought on by the EU which mand…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:56 AM
-3

Alright, alright alright. I know what I said, what's with the quoting?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:02 AM
1

Oh.. I think most people, like me, didn't pick up on that.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:01 AM
2

What, why?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:00 AM
-14

It's called child bearing, you idiot. Assuming you don't refer to some strange act of raping children from behind.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:26 AM
2

Indeed it is. This has most likely evolved due to green being the most useless colour in photosynthesis. Which is why plants and what not look green. This is also the reason there are way more men being red / green colour blind. Evolution has taken care of the women as they've had to distinguish red berries from the green plants they grow on, from back in the hunter-gatherer times.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:25 AM
2

Norway, +1 actually.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:21 AM
2

Huh... it's 9:15 here and I'm at school.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:17 AM
3

I told you to not fucking click it! It's 2 am? Where on earth are you?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:02 AM
-1

Look at my comment above..
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:45 AM
0

I never saw it, but I think it might have been this. And people, do not click that. Especially not if you're using headphones.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:44 AM
11

But most of us didn't see it and are glad we were able to now. Hence the upvotes. Keep your hipstercism to yourself.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:42 AM
3

But women can do this, why shouldn't we?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:41 AM
3

Well that's odd.. Purple is actually a very interesting colour, though. It's a mix between both far ends of the spectrum, red and blue. The colours pretty much loop around and creates purple, which is why there are so many shades of purple, all of which can be separated between red-purple, blue-purple and the neutral mix.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:07 PM
3

The human eye is designed to see the colour green very well. That is, we can distinguish more shades of green than red and blue (and thus every colour). However, experiments and studies have shown that most people (or, the most picked colour, I should say) pick yellow when asked to pick a favourite colour. It is just psychologically more pleasing. And people perceive blue to be a cold colour, even though it is technically the warmest colour we can see. So the question becomes. What is the right …
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:30 PM
5

I would think A and C are pretty much the same, no?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:25 PM
1

Guys, he said many people would argue that. Doesn't say he thinks that, or that that's the correct definition.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:11 PM
1

If you mean 'unreasonable', I'm totally on board.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:53 PM
1

Oh, that is fucking brilliant! And in California they just use your last know address, not even bothering to check if you've moved or are on vacation. No fucks given.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:20 PM
0

Yes, that's what I said.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:18 PM
0

Likewise. And of course, I would care about that too, but it wouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:39 PM
0

You make a good point. Transvestites / transsexuals, tomato / potato. As for the gender.. They probably could. But you could argue the author did it because s/he felt it was more likely to get that kind of boss, if the boss were a woman. I don't know. What I do know, though, is that there wouldn't be anyone caring if it was the other way around. "Why I would rather have a boss as my woman, than a man."
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:21 PM
0

I responded to another guy, asking the same thing here.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:54 PM
-1

You are right about the last part. Bosses shouldn't be judged by gender, and I don't think OP / the author did that. I think they meant they wouldn't want to be employed by the general woman he described. And secondly, no. No studies. But I have anecdotal evidence, if that's to any help. First of all we all know the stereotype that women are indeed more emotional. And this is what I've personally experienced with (most) women. As for the anecdotal evidence; men who have started taking estrogen p…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:52 PM
-4

As for 3, he was generalizing. Which he was correct to do, because on average, woman are more emotional than men.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:28 PM
-1

I don't think this is journalism, in that sense. It's more like a commentary, where s/he talks about his/her experiences with former bosses.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:27 PM
9

I do not support "equality for women". That is just stupid. If you substitute "women" with "both genders", or something similar, then I'm on board. Of course. But that's not what feminism means. That might be the dictionary-definition, but (generally) those who call themselves feminists are for equal rights, which is good, but they also want to be treated differently (better) because they are women. That is just hypocritical, and is what the large masses, including myself, associate 'feminism' w…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:07 PM
9

Oh, persecuted. That I can understand.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:03 PM
16

No, I wasn't being condescending. I literally thought he meant prosecuted, as in by an attorney or something.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:56 PM
11

You just described the problem. "[...] equal rights for women"?! That doesn't make any sense. Feminists want to have their cake and eat it to. All we want is reasonable equality between human beings.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:25 PM
2

Where and why would you be prosecuted?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:21 PM
0

Or, if you do not respond / cannot prove you innocence with in 30 days (or 60 in some area). If then the mother refuses the paternity test, you're screwed.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:28 AM
1

Spot on. The conflict of interest is probably responsible. Because, if the woman manages to evade the paternity test for a month, they will default you as a father.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:27 AM
1

Well, good for you. I'm happy on the behalf of your children.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:25 AM
1

I would also hate this particular woman.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:22 AM
1

No, I meant she could pick a random guy. She doesn't really need to have meat him at all. I should've been clearer.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:30 PM
0

No. Read the entire article. If the child is more than two years old, the mother denies the paternity test, and you can't otherwise prove you're not the father within 60 days (may vary slightly depending on local laws); a default motion will carry and you are now the legal father.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:08 PM
1

Well, best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:10 PM
1

But imagine all the endless hours of the night spent reading through the curriculum and cramming and what not.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:16 PM
1

Oh man that sucks. Even if you got a paternity test now, you'd still be 'stuck with them'. My question is, however, would you leave them if you could?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:08 AM
1

I pray for you man. Figuratively. But don't underestimate how much work law school is.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:07 AM
1

No it wouldn't. Just swab some spit from the inside of your mouth, and that is that.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:01 AM
1

Get a paternity test? It's not difficult, it's just that if the mother doesn't want to, you have no right to get one.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:00 AM
1

I think he's not saying that a random guy off the street is a solution, but rather that in some cases it's just a lost cause trying to find the real dad. And those are the mothers we as a society should help out, through taxes. Of course, though, if she knew she couldn't find the father, and knew she couldn't support the child herself, she should never have had it.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:00 AM
1

I'll try and remember that answer. You know, just in case. But how are people like this not repaid by the state? The court obviously wrongly convicted him, and in any other scenario he would be found innocent and receive compensation.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:54 AM
3

But, just to get the story straight, you are getting child support from her now?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:48 AM
1

I'm sorry that happened to you. But I'm curious to how you got her to agree to a paternity test?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:45 AM
6

The problem isn't as much that it's more often the woman who gets custody, rather than the man, but that said woman can just point at any wealthy bloke from the papers and say he's the father. And now, if he cannot prove his "innocence" within thirty days without using DNA testing, the child is legally his. Don't get me wrong though, more men should get custody of their kids.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:43 AM
0

Yes, thank you. And that is exactly what is happening in this article. Guilty until proven innocent. And the one who has to do the proving; the man. And if the kid is more than 2 years of age, the mother can refuse a paternity test. So, unless you have alibi for that night 2 years and nine months ago, you're stuck paying child support to a random woman you've never even met.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:32 PM
2

Well shouldn't women be able to 'enslave' other women as well? What the hell? This is not how our democracy is built up. We're supposed to share the burden of society. And if she did / both parents couldn't afford the kid, they never should've got it.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:18 PM
6

I'm not saying fathers should not pay for their children. I'm saying pointing at a random dude on the street and forcing him to pay for a random child of a random woman is ludicrous. How can you not see that?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:50 PM
4

So you think randomly selecting people off the street to pay for someone's child is okay? Mind you, they should not have gotten the child if they could not support it financially. Oh, and did I mention these random people on the street are selectively men?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:48 PM
4

I will. Tomorrow. I just need to cool down a bit first.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:08 PM
3

You do realise if you guys keep throwing this stuff at me I'm going to explode in rage, right? I mean, literally.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:01 PM
3

Yes. Italic, bold, caps were necessary. That's how outraged I am.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:43 PM
10

Oh my god. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS FUCKING WORLD?!
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:42 PM
1

But this. I haven't seen anything this outrageously stupid.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:25 PM
7

This makes a hundred per cent sense in my mind. Also, if you as a boyfriend / someone who fucked her realizes she is pregnant, I believe you should have the right to say: "I do not want this baby, just so that is clear. It is up to you if you want to have an abortion (or adopt for that matter). But if you decide to keep it, it is your choice and I want nothing to do with it." At this point you waive any rights. Any rights as a future father, but also any financial responsibilities. Doesn't this …
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:23 PM
5

I still feel kind of alone. It's not like anyone else here is having a fit over this as well.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:16 PM
6

Why aren't anyone executed for this injustice? I am getting so worked up around about now!
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:58 PM
8

I may have worded that poorly. But it's not fair to pick people at random. If someone have to support the future of our world, it should be EVERYONE equally, or the rich more so. And then why only men, when it is randomly chosen. Why not women? Let's just have a lottery. If they can't find the REAL father, the only reasonable course of action is to share the burden.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:52 PM
8

What is wrong with you? Of course not systematically robbing thousands of men a year is more important than saving a few tax dollars.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:33 PM
80

But... she needs no evidence. And who can prove they're not the father, without a paternity test?? WE'RE PRESUMED GUILTY! What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:48 PM
0

This makes me so fucking angry I want to nuke the entire country.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:19 PM
1

That makes absolutely no fucking sense. Thus; a chick can just point at a random guy, whom she did not actually have any sort of intercourse with, and claim him as the father and he would have nothing he could do about it, except pay up?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:58 PM
1

No, why? If she claims a kid is yours, I imagine it is at least your fucking right to get a paternity test before you start paying child support. Is it not?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:57 AM
-15

How did two guys get raped? Care to elaborate..? :) Also, he could've gotten a paternity test.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:07 PM
-21

I just come here for the circle jerk...I love it.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:04 PM
4

Well, most of the posts, if not all, in this subreddit is stupid fucking shit and should never see the light of day anywhere else. We upvote it, not because we agree, but exactly because we disagree.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:40 PM
1

That's what got me too.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:39 PM
8

I read this online too, but no one really seemed to care. But imagine if it were the other way around. Crazy ex boyfriend rips out woman's teeth in blind rage! Everyone would be chanting that men are evil, he should have his nuts surgically removed, and that everyone should ban that particular dental firm.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:34 PM
2

It would be outraged, but in this case no one really cared in the original post. That's the point.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 02:11 PM
2

I know. I was referring to your username ;)
/r/MensRights29/04/12 02:06 AM
0

Well then it's a good strategy.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:09 AM
1

Well that's easy for you. Not so much for us with mediocre and less so.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:06 AM
1

Well, it gets to the front page because it's crap.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:05 AM
-2

[...] that. FTFY
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:02 AM
9

Very intelligent of you. Have you ever offered to pay, though?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:57 PM
0

This went off on an interesting tangent. You know, all the way from men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:52 PM
3

We should just have sex more often and the world would be a better place.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:48 PM
27

Why do you put question marks after sentences which are not questions? Use them right?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:46 PM
-1

Well obviously they give you sex in return. Duh.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:44 PM
-1

For a second there I thought your username was Part Time Batman. Too bad, though.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter