TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhippingBoys Archive

View 51 posts and 219 comments by WhippingBoys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
707

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:22 PM
539

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:38 AM
403

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:29 AM
255

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:22 AM
171

DiscriminationWhippingBoys/r/MensRights12/01/15 10:08 PM
150

Misleading TitleWhippingBoys/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:09 AM
118

re: FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:57 AM
116

DiscriminationWhippingBoys/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:18 AM
107

FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:28 AM
106

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights21/11/14 10:58 AM
83

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:30 AM
80

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:58 PM
74

Anti-MRAWhippingBoys/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:08 AM
73

re: FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights18/10/14 02:53 AM
68

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:06 PM
66

DiscriminationWhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:50 AM
64

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights21/10/14 09:11 AM
58

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights19/11/14 08:27 AM
58

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:53 AM
54

FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:16 AM
49

DiscriminationWhippingBoys/r/MensRights01/02/15 10:38 AM
45

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:12 PM
44

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:19 AM
43

StoryWhippingBoys/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:46 AM
41

False AccusationsWhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:58 PM
37

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:08 PM
34

NewsWhippingBoys/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:12 PM
28

AnalysisWhippingBoys/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:43 AM
24

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:21 AM
20

OpinionWhippingBoys/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:38 AM
18

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:51 AM
15

re: FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:27 AM
15

re: FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:38 AM
12

FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:04 PM
12

False AccusationsWhippingBoys/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:28 AM
11

AnalysisWhippingBoys/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:02 AM
11

DiscriminationWhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:22 AM
5

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:10 AM
5

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:39 AM
4

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:56 PM
3

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:52 AM
3

SatireWhippingBoys/r/MensRights14/11/14 07:52 AM
2

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:29 AM
2

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights25/11/14 08:46 AM
2

Reverse GendersWhippingBoys/r/MensRights20/01/15 10:14 PM
2

re: FeminismWhippingBoys/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:07 AM
1

OutrageWhippingBoys/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:24 AM
1

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:10 PM
0

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:51 AM
0

DiscussionWhippingBoys/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:41 AM
0

WhippingBoys/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:06 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I know what it's for too. I stated that /r/pcmasterrace doesn't promote Nazi ideology in the /r/discusstheopenletter subreddit before it was made private. No rule breaking, no brigading, no spam. Just correcting some user. You guys should keep an eye out. I know /r/mensrights was in their targets along with /r/kotakuinaction and /r/tumblrinaction.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:02 AM
4

Legally, it does NO, it DOESN'T. Show me the law where intoxication means you're unable to consent to sex? Because it would mean you both raped each other if you were both drunk and you could drive drunk because "I can't consent to driving lol".
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:30 AM
1

It was public until yesterday. Was viewing it just fine and then they've made it private.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:59 AM
6

They also talked about removing /r/pcmasterrace because "it promotes Nazi ideology". Edit: I've just been shadowbanned for mentioning on that discussion that claiming /r/pcmasterrace "promotes Nazi ideology" is (and I direct quote myself) 'factually, memetically and socially false'. I've been shadowbanned for saying that /r/pcmasterrace isn't promoting Nazi ideology. Guys, we've got some serious shit happening.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:58 AM
15

Consent is NOT possible if one person is under the influence of alcohol or drugs Intoxication due to drugs or alcohol does NOT invalidate consent to sex. It's getting pretty frightening that this lie is being pushed so blatantly, even in schools. If you are intoxicated you retain the ability to BOTH consent and deny consent to sex. The only way you cannot consent is if you are incapacitated or unconscious (this also doesn't relate to whether or not you've given specific consent for someone to en…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:50 AM
3

It's even more so for the prostitution claim. Since it would be "promoting" the opposite of prostitution, which requires them not doing it for free.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:36 AM
4

100% behind this being a rule. A list of sites that can't be posted here unless archived so they don't generate click bait for these sexist authors would be completely acceptable. Anything else is fair game unless it becomes obvious they are just spewing misandry for clicks and then after a short discussion on whether or not they qualify they can be added as well.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:34 AM
7

Don't try to downplay her. She's a full on rabid feminist. She's part of a campaign to raise money to "pay back women for being paid 75 cents to the dollar". This isn't humour. She genuinely believes the bullshit she puts out.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:01 AM
4

Feminism doesn't have a central organizing agency. Absolute horseshit simplification. Feminism, as a whole, overwhelmingly is sexist and defies equality. We know this not because the vast majority of feminists are like that, but because almost every single (if not every single) organization that self-identifies as feminist is sexist, misandrist, against equality or a combination of all three. And that's not including that the biggest feminist organizations are sexist against men and against equa…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:34 AM
10

No. Because MRA's also support egalitarianism. We are just a subset of egalitarianism fighting specifically for rights men lack. Once we achieve that we fade into egalitarianism. Feminists claim feminism is equality, including racial and homosexual equality, but it can only be achieved by helping women and ignoring any inequality that men get as a direct result. Because something something you can't be sexist against men. They write article after article actually attacking Humanism and Egalitari…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:26 AM
5

Weird. Thankyou. Apparently she might not even be Helen Mirren, since she had a different haircut recently at the awards (long hair).
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:08 AM
8

https://archive.today/724CV Here's the archived version. Do not give them clicks. This was a half assed article that still managed to bash men and groups that support men for female rape of men. Given Crackeds long history of misandry and MRA bashing, while downplaying the very idea men can be victims, this article doesn't suddenly give them integrity. Especially when they go on to blame men for female-on-male rape and lack of support. They have been steadily losing viewers because of their hard…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:49 AM
10

Nope. Still regular misandry day at their offices. They still managed to blame men for female rapists.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:45 AM
5

Don't be surprised. The entire last section is blaming men and this non-existent "Patriarchy" for male rape. They talk about female-on-male rape and still manage to make it the fault of men even though article after article on Cracked has pumped out anti-male, anti-mra bullshit and consistantly downplayed any talk of male rape or male victims with "but it happens to women more". There has been a massive backlash these last few years against them and other sites like them. This is a last ditch ef…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:43 AM
3

This. They created yet another article bashing MRA's but included male rape because the evidence is so overwhelmingly against them at this point and yet they still managed to blame a womans rape of a man on men. They don't deserve the hit regardless.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:04 AM
3

And I say "fuck that". In America, we don't force victims to report crimes and force them to testify against their will. Nor did they here. She wasn't forced to do anything. But the little fucking kicker that comes with expecting a process to punish your "rapist" and provide for you the "victim" is entirely built upon actually going through the process of AT LEAST officially reporting the crime. Nobody is forcing her to do anything. They are just not giving her hysterical self what she wants bec…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:29 AM
3

This is The Trial. The UK is literally enacting the system inherent in Kafkas 'The Trial' for rape allegations against men. Holy shit.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:17 AM
0

Palin running is an absolute sure fire loss that would make the Republicans $889 million campaign a pointless waste of money. The upside to it is that Hilary cannot begin her campaign on claims of misogyny, severely setting back her future use of it. Which she undoubtedly will be doing, non-stop, throughout any Presidency.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:04 AM
2

The father had two glasses of wine as well and didn't try to kill his fucking children.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:57 AM
0

Yes but feminists don't think it's the "right kind of feminism" (even though it's just as absurd and illogical as theirs).
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:48 PM
1

Such an emotional knee jerk reaction. Strange. The feminist started raging about Nazis...and is now complaining pointing that out is the "emotional knee jerk reaction". I have played white South African privilege. No, you've just ranted about Nazis because your ridiculous definition of racism was thoroughly countered and you, as predicted, flipped out trying to rationalise it away. Have you even tried playing Jew privilege? Still running with that fallacy I see? Sorry, that's your definition of …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:24 AM
1

Using their ridiculous definition of "racism" and apply it to South Africa where it exactly matches and you claim that's Godwin...even though Godwin relates to Nazis? That's some special level of feminist stupidity. Poor South Africans have a lower income, life expectancy and standard of living than any black South Africans. Unless you're rich, being white in South Africa is incredibly horrible. They are denied jobs because of the colour of their skin as national policy, they cannot get welfare …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:54 AM
2

As a Ghost Busters fan, I was pretty pissed when they said they would be making a new Transformers fanbase Ghost Busters. Especially when the big deal about a new movie was that all the cast refused to make one (having ownership of the movie rights) until they all agreed to the script. They FINALLY did...and another died. So shit. It's off. I guess it won't happen for another 20 years. Nope. New one. And instead of just getting good god damned actors and a great script and just trying, TRYING to…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:31 AM
6

This is genuinely what's going to happen. I'm honestly wondering if we might need to get a few people together who have the time, make up a bunch of infographs and get ready to push them viral after the first claim. The horrible sexist misandry these last few years blaming men for the failure of everything is just getting worse and worse. I'm genuinely worried for you Americans when you have to deal with Hilary. She's going to blame every one of her failures and genuine criticism on "misogyny" a…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:24 AM
0

caveat Those issues are that they are deliberately including sexism in what is meant to be a dictionary to define words. Saying "oh this usually means men" isn't the definition of the word. It's a biased and disgusting inclusion that has no bearing on a definition that doesn't relate to gender. Including "mostly carried out by blacks" in the crime definition would be just as inappropriate even in severe racist times because it is unrelated to the definition and included solely due to political P…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:23 AM
1

If it even comes up, remember to use the South Africa argument. By their literal exact definition, poor white South Africans are oppressed. They are a minority. The overwhelming majority of the country is run by black South Africans. The laws specifically discriminate against them, as in genuinely requiring them to be denied a position in a job if a black person applies, regardless of ability. They are socially oppressed as well. Watch them squirm trying to justify how that's "different" because…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:36 AM
1

Rape is repeatedly defined as forced sexual intercourse in almost every, if not every, English speaking dictionary and is not defined as "hurr durr only women can be raped by men". http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/rape On top of ignorant comments like yours also denying that rape has occurred when objects have been forced sexually into someone, which is gender neutral, and the fact you ignored the dictionary definition backs this subs definition, it would be as absurd as saying…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:30 AM
1

but it is a race in that membership in the system (even without belief!) is passed through a genetic connection And once again I will point out that it's factually and objectively false. There is no magical Jewish gene passed on solely through the mother as you claim.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:59 PM
2

It takes a special level of sheer sexist ignorance to take a caricature from 150 years ago and actually become that caricature. Makes you wonder if all these parodies of feminism back then were actually portraying the misandry those feminists had back then, as they do now.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:14 AM
-4

That is factually, biologically and objectively false. If a Catholic claims that Catholics are defined by "your father is a Catholic, therefore you would be ethnically Catholic" it is just as absurd. The historical oppression of various races and ethnicities of Jews doesn't mean particular ideas of Judaism get to redefine scientific facts. Why the hell are people like Charles being upvote brigaded and anyone agreeing with this analogy being downvote brigaded?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:14 AM
4

Can't think for yourself? You need feminism
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/15 12:10 AM
4

She immediately blames people laughing at Biebers poorly done photoshop by claiming they're doing so only because he's not tall and masculine, then complains that the reason people are immaculating him is because of misogyny against women. Perhaps next time watch the video. Especially when she talks about how great it is that he's topless at the very start of the video but has called it objectification in all her other videos when it's of women.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:05 AM
9

Doesn't matter if it does. There will be no legal ramifications for the woman and the father will still be required to pay child support.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 12:01 AM
2

Right wing conservatives. Can't have fluoride in the water but cutting off a chunk of a childs genitals is a-okay.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 11:39 AM
1

To be fair, who hasn't tried to buy NBC at some point?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 02:22 AM
3

/r/didnotdothemath It checks out.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:08 AM
13

SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP. This entire horseshit "omg just ignore" fuckery has done the exact opposite of stopping her growth. Right now, the overwhelming criticism ABC is receiving over this is going to actually accomplish something other than this ridiculous and completely pointless "just ignore" idiocy. She gained power when people ignored her. She was a nobody and nobody gave a shit. She then kept gathering sympathy and power every time anyone ignored her. Because it allowed her lies and fraudulen…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:06 AM
2

So OP uses a link to the DailyMail as an example of how bad the DailyMail is... And you moronically claim it "undermines this sub"?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:57 AM
1

Don't worry. If you seem like you're not trying to look, I always assume you're just some regular Joe going about your business.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:19 AM
2

How hard is it to have stalls without god damned side gaps. Seriously!
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:02 AM
1

I think this has actually been posted on /r/nottheonion when I searched. Could be mistaken, lot of feminist articles make it there.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:20 AM
0

Almost exclusively due to right wing conservatives and feminist opposition. Large multi-stalled gender neutral toilets, with a separate walled section for the urinals and adequate security is something no-one should oppose. Instead we have feminists ranting that mens toilets need to be gender neutral while women get to keep theirs because of "safety".
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:46 AM
6

Then it's... women have an even bigger line now, that's sexism again women Okay, let's have one small restroom that only has a urinal in it for men. That's sexist against women
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:41 AM
23

It's pretty ridiculous. Even at festivals with the exact same amount of gender neutral cubicles, even with the majority of festival goers being men, the lines for the male sections are vastly shorter than the womens. Feminists like the author refuse to realise that they have the exact equal treatment to men in this regard. But we predominantly urinate and when we do so it's using a incredibly efficient organ.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:11 AM
1

I see this threads comments have been downvote brigaded.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 10:54 PM
3

It goes from calm and collective... To a teacher telling a kid he raped a girl because he had consensual sex with her while they both were intoxicated... To him killing himself out of fear of the massive social stigma of being declared a rapist and thinking he's going to jail for rape.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:59 PM
9

I found my wife crying over this article last night. She was absolutely devastated that this poor kid killed himself over a lie we hear every day and was bawling her eyes out thinking it might happen to any future son of ours one day. Read the article and then got just as upset. Super tired. Did not enjoy going to bed angry. This disgusting feminist bullshit needs to stop. How many fucking lives do they need to destroy!
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:49 PM
40

One of the major reasons the "street harassment" video blew up in their face is that out of 10 hours of footage walking around in a shit area, aka they did everything they could to increase the chance someone would harass her, they got less than 2 minutes of footage...of people saying "hello", "have a good day" and "wow". It blew up in their face because their evidence that women get harassed was to show it's not an issue. So using this is definitely going to work.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:44 PM
1

I didn't say it couldn't be embraced and defended. See doublethink. FTFY
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:44 PM
4

For some reason archive.today is cutting out half of the article.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:39 PM
1

Do everything on the good list? YOU'RE GASLIGHTING HER!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:35 AM
2

Do you want lice? Because this is how you get lice.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:31 AM
4

I honestly don't see prison rape jokes anymore other than on Feminist Facebook page or website comment sections. And they're always brought against men or even to mock MRA's who justifiably condemn those jokes in the comments. The only other place I see similar is the comment sections of hardcore right wing Facebook pages. And when they say it, it's never in jest. They genuinely want the person to be raped in prison for whatever crime they're highlighting.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:16 AM
0

So, that's still a no. No you can't provide any examples.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:35 AM
3

c-circlejerk You keep repeating that fallacy as if it magically gives you an argument. Pretending these people are an "extremist minority" consistently no matter how many examples come up in mainstream media (Valenti), the largest feminist organizations (NOW) and damn near every major feminist leader and academic, is something no-one is buying other than feminists. Coming into /r/mensrights and ranting that we're a circle jerk for showing an example of feminist misandry is also not exactly helpi…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:21 AM
2

It's remarkable that no matter how many major feminist organizations or famous feminist leaders come out with this same level of batshit misandry, it's always a "minority of extremists".
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:47 AM
0

So no. You can't link any examples. Strange that this excuse is the same every single time someone rants that Men's Rights is "just as bad" and filled with "misogynists".
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:43 AM
3

We really need to start teaching women not to steal. Right?
/r/PussyPass29/12/14 11:33 AM
1

Since then you've... Attempted to argue that female genital mutilation should be legal if it allows male genital mutilation to be legal Continued to push your anti-semitism angle fallacy Repeatedly and consistently ignorant linked and detailed information refuting your claims So yes, my post still remains relevant.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:11 AM
0

Well, maybe making the type of circumcision you were describing illegal was the error instead. And now you're arguing that the cutting off of the clitoral hood should be legal. The depths of your religious fanaticism is disturbing.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:07 AM
1

No, you've just spouted your nonsense repeatedly and then continued to spout your nonsense after the second, third and fourth times you were refuted. Nobody is buying this ridiculous "oh guuuyz, i'm just being a nice poster" fallacy.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:04 AM
3

Men have plenty of support for their character. But when they use it they are demonised for it as evidence of their guilt. Oh, a group of guys who semi-knew the alleged rapist are all defending him as innocent because they were there that night and know for a fact he didn't do it because he was with them every minute? They must be lying to protect their rapist buddy. This only proves that men all support rape. A woman makes a false accusation but gets a bunch of her friends months down the track…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:48 AM
2

He was cleared of the crime. Not that he didn't spend a year in prison awaiting trial.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:41 AM
30

And as none of the feminists in the /r/videos thread have actually provided evidence for, where is the proof of your claim? Because all the articles so far detail that he was put in prison and then released a year later when his trial concluded. Everything states he was in prison for a year awaiting trial. Not that he was sentenced to prison for a year. He was still in prison for a year. So where is the evidence he was only in prison for 1 day and then released to await trial?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 11:30 AM
5

My religion is different Your personal religious faith does not trump the rights of a child that cannot (and statistically do not when they grow older if they have never had it done) consent to being mutilated. Nobody is denying a grown adult the legal right to mutilate themselves for their religion. No-one is "misunderstanding" you. You're just repeatedly ignoring everyones posts and running off on some fallacious tangent trying to justify your deliberate ignorance. Such as right now where you …
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:50 AM
3

Pretending to be an "innocent question asker" in the face of your replies to everyone completely countering your fallacious logic isn't going to be painting you as somehow some poor neutral guy being attacked by /r/mensrights You've spent this entire thread being deliberately ignorant after posts explained what you asked and you keep repeating the same fallacies over and over again while pretending your fallacious posts aren't passive aggressive. Nobody is buying it. So either start acting logic…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:38 AM
3

since female circumcision is so detrimental to women Type I consists of almost literally the female equivalent of male genital mutilation; the removal of the clitoral hood. It's still, arguably, not worse physically than male genital mutilation according to most. Type I is the most common form of female genital mutilation. And it is held universally illegal by every damn government in the Western world, as well as the UN. Type I also contains the ritualistic pricking to draw blood of the clitori…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:35 AM
7

OP asks a fallaciously loaded leading question and then spends the entire thread repeatedly ignoring where he is refuted and continues to complain that the exact comparable situations in physical mutilation, legal rights, parental rights, consent and religious adherence are "different". That's why he's likely getting downvoted. Because he has been countered and he refuses to listen to anything stated because of his own personal religious fanaticism and ignorance. Which would be why he brought up…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:31 AM
5

it's different! ...because! No. That's not how equality works. You don't get a free pass to mutilate male babies because you personally think that those other guys religion is worth less than yours and that's why female genital mutilation is "totally different".
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:26 AM
5

but those are different And there we have your deliberate ignorance in a nutshell. No. No they're not. Religious beliefs don't trump the rights of others, nor do they give free range to physically mutilate others without their consent, even IN a free society regardless of how much you personally want your particular religious sect to be given a "free pass" because "these beliefs are super important".
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:24 AM
3

but we regularly don't argue consent when it comes to infants We do all the time. In fact we have government agencies that handle these situations specifically, schools that are required by law to mention to police even a remote suspicion of harm, etc. etc. Do you think a Baptist should have the right to let their child die from malnutrition and a treatable infection because they don't believe in medical care and want to "pray the illness away"? Afterall, "they know what's in the best interests …
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:17 AM
4

What about the whole argument that parents have some responsibility to their children? And a parent thinking that not giving their child legally required life saving medical care because "Jesus" still do not have a right to harm their child because of their religious beliefs. Strangely enough I doubt you'll be supporting Hindi practices of head gashing children or female genital mutilation in African Christian/Muslim sects.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:00 AM
3

A persons religion doesn't magically trump a childs right to choice and bodily integrity. Less so than people claiming it's okay for refuted pseudo-medical/anti-masturbatory reasons.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 12:57 AM
9

We don't give a shit what your religious beliefs are. You can mutilate yourself or you can mutilate another consenting grown adult. But you can't mutilate a child that has absolutely no chance or intellectually ability TO consent. We don't give a shit if some Witness wants to reject blood transfusions or a Baptist thinks faith healing works. But you also can't kill your own child because of your beliefs. At this point you're being deliberately ignorant about very specific things we are clearly a…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 12:55 AM
82

"Men aren't doing enough to raise children." -Society "Get that man away from those children, he could be a pedophile." -Society "Stop trying to fix the issue! Don't you know the issue is Patriarchy?! Which can only be fixed by more feminism!" - Feminists
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:20 PM
3

Come back when MRA's aren't overwhelmingly Egalitarians. We don't deny the two. MRA's are a subset of Egalitarianism. But we also support Egalitarianism. Feminists are currently posting article after article ranting that Humanism and Egalitarianism is sexist, misogynistic and is incompatible with Feminism.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 03:26 AM
1

What they were doing was still a crime in Belgium, one that allowed for a defensive physical restraining response. Especially as it was against a politician.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:34 AM
4

Specifically a feminist motive. Why the fuck are people bullshitting about this getting voted so highly? The feminist group Lilith has claimed responsibility for the attack: “We launched to face the symbol of Belgium who are dismantling”.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:33 AM
1

Sucker punch the girls when it was clear all he would get was some fries and mayo? Immediately restrain the attackers, regardless of what they think the substance is, because they are committing a serious attack on a politician. Nobody is saying smash their heads in. But not arresting them or stopping them because they are women is fucking moronic.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:32 AM
2

It's amazing that after 8 months of not once posting in Mens Rights, you've come in to rage that these aren't feminists or a feminist attack on a man isn't to do with mens rights. Especially when the feminist group Lilith has claimed responsibility for the attack: “We launched to face the symbol of Belgium who are dismantling”.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:30 AM
2

I'm not quite sure why /u/benjimann91 comment isn't lower. Especially when the feminist group Lilith has claimed responsibility for the attack: “We launched to face the symbol of Belgium who are dismantling”.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:27 AM
2

Try again. The feminist group Lilith has claimed responsibility for the attack: “We launched to face the symbol of Belgium who are dismantling”.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:26 AM
2

Nope. As study after study keeps showing, men are treated no differently online than women. Probably something to do with the fact that your sex and race are invisible in online gaming. And the female gamers overwhelmingly aren't raging against games because they don't give a shit that the game allows you to kill women, since it also allows you to kill men. It's the non-gamers and idiots who aren't playing these types of games in the first place that rage about them.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:49 AM
5

The same feminist sites pushing this bullshit keep using "example" pictures in which women are doing the exact same thing or (usually) worse. I mean take a look at their own campaign photos. That black guy is sitting perfectly normally and isn't in anyones way. The woman next to him has three bags, one a travel bag, and has her legs push to his side.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:24 PM
7

And almost, quite literally, none of these feminist sites that are shaming men are presenting examples of people taking up "2 spaces". It's almost entirely people sitting on empty benches, within their seats or doing exactly (usually less) what the female next to them is.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:19 PM
5

I'm honestly thinking about printing up a fuckload of pamphlets, using these websites and group names and all of their ridiculous pictures that have a normal sitting guy with a woman taking up 2 whole seats with her bags and legs, distributing them all over the train stations and cities in Australia. Just that sheer fucking absurdity might shut down this psychotic style of misandrist feminism that is beginning to gain power here.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:14 PM
4

Directly targeting men for a non-existent issue? Isn't that illegal and in violation of federal discrimination laws?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:15 PM
1

Oh dear, still going full feminist?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:59 AM
16

That's actually completely what this woman says. Her first two claims are that when children are murdered it's... Men who are trying to get revenge on their wives Murder suicide against their wives Oh, yeah sometimes women also kill children. But it's super rare.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:54 AM
5

Worse still is that she makes excuses for both women and indigenous Australians while stating that it's "rare" for women to kill their children (it's not in relation to child murders) and that men do the majority of killing trying to get "revenge on their partners" and "in murder suicides". People who kill children like these have severe issues. But to then claim that it's men that are the issue and act like they have no excuse? Blatant sexism.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:51 AM
8

after the media was blaming men for the Sydney siege ... OMG YOU ARE BLAMING WOMEN FOR THE SIEGE Oh hey, you've gone full feminist. Never go full feminist.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:46 AM
8

men statistically murder at a much higher rate than women And yet sane people don't blame all men for it, especially when the overwhelming majority of victims are men. Yet here we have someone in the wake of a woman murdering 8 children, a high profile CEO of a research organisation, blaming men for killing children. Which is extremely odd in itself, since while men commit murder more often...WOMEN overwhelmingly commit the majority of CHILD murders, which this segment was about. Yet we here don…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:44 AM
2

Are you kidding me, OP? Apparently men are still to blame for this womans murder of 8 children. Said the CEO of a feminist research organisation on womens safety while on live national TV.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:26 PM
53

This organisation produces research. Can you imagine what damage their lies have done so far?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:23 PM
2

Quick search brings up sources in Mens Rights alone. The first one has been on the front page for a while.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:32 AM
27

Ah yes, multiple articles literally days apart blaming men as a gender for the Sydney siege... Yet here we have the biggest child murder crime in Australia and we are "appropriating" the issue by pointing out the media and feminist hypocrisy? The difference, you complete fucking simpleton, is that we are NOT BLAMING WOMEN FOR THIS CRIME. We are blaming the sexist assholes now that their hypocrisy is showing in the wake of this tragedy. I, for one, think this woman is severely mentally disturbed.…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:20 AM
36

This is right after they've been spewing disgusting articles about the Sydney seige as "violence against women" and "*one person doesn't represent all Muslims but this shows that we have an issue of men being violent**". Including on the ABC.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:56 AM
16

Absolutely pathetic. Worse still are the excuses they will make. "Oh, this is just a joke. Plus MEN totally did the same thing back in the..." No. Equality isn't about "getting even". How the fuck do these people not grasp this?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:41 PM
3

she HATES on men's rights issues, and issues related to boys. The woman is a misandrist. Yes, clearly men shouldn't care about that at aaaaall.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:14 AM
3

I haven't linked either directly or even indirectly to the site. But thanks for flipping out because you don't understand how archive.today works. It's no different than a screen capture. But it shows the site rather than a possibly doctored image. Second, no...I think I'll keep pointing out what these sites say because what they say is a men's rights issue. Third, you directly linked to the sexist authors about page in the other thread on this subject in your LAST post.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:13 AM
1

Apparently a lot of writers are not appreciating the irony. There are more articles coming out blaming men for the siege while specifically stating Muslims aren't to blame cause it was "just one person and they don't represent Islam".
/r/MensRights18/12/14 12:12 AM
7

Problem is that (3) never happens.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:10 PM
13

It has been extraordinarily sanity restoring to see the comment sections of even major feminist news media being swamped by men and women outraged at the sheer blatant sexism of feminists in the last few years. It's gone from a mouth piece with everyone backing up their vile sexism to almost total overwhelming opposition of their own readership. It's really, really great to see people waking up.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 09:32 AM
16

Ah yes, bring back our girls. But mention that that has been almost exclusively boys being killed before that? We're "mansplainers" and "trying to bring criticism of feminism into everything". A SHITLOAD OF BOYS ARE MURDERED? And major fucking news media in the Western world is ranting that a female teacher was killed while mysteriously leaving out the gender of the children they mourn alongside her. This isn't even a matter of children just being referred to as such (which is still pathetic as …
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:40 AM
7

Oh boy, she did in fact write an Elliot Rodgers article as well. Blaming it all on men in that one too.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:46 PM
10

Muslims aren't to blame And that's true. While the attack was motivated by this persons religion, it doesn't represent the overwhelming majority of Muslims either statistically or philosophically. But MEN are And there's where this pathetic piece of shit goes off the fucking rails. Muslims aren't to blame but HALF THE FUCKING POPULATION OF THE WORLD IS??!! This is utter misandrist bullshit, no different than Anita Sarkeesian blaming men after the Canadian shooting or feminists blaming men after …
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:32 PM
1

Ah yes, we should just "man up".
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:26 AM
1

It didn't help that it started in America either. Regardless of the many great people in the United States, overall their country has a puritan level mindset in every aspect of its society. Liberals over there are just slightly less conservative than their right wingers. The huge feminist revival over there simply meant that the largest and most influential collection of feminists was the anti-sex American feminists.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:42 AM
0

Feminism is on it's third wave in 60 years. Each wave had to give way to the new one or be held accountable for it's previous racism and bigotry. Now this third wave refuses to let go, hastening their demise. The next wave? It will be the all encompassing Egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:13 AM
8

And it's MORE than likely NOT profit. Companies never miss a chance to rant on about their profits. Gawker has been very, very specific and not mentioned profits once but gone on about their (one years) revenue. Which includes what they need to run the business. They are fucked
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:10 AM
3

My fiance just informed me that when the guy speaks about Christmas toys, he references the names of his children. But regardless, she's ranting about "forcing gender stereotypes on children" over a song that was made almost 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:42 AM
1

Oh yes, most non-feminists claim that the male partner might have been a domestic abuser and then go off on gender studies rants. And there's totally no evidence she was cheating either, right? Perhaps read the article and its accompanying links next time rather than going off on your own anti-mens rights circlejerk because you can't be bothered with reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:59 PM
1

Seems the rest us read it. You didn't make it pass the title.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:02 AM
1

Perhaps you should read, hmm? The article starts off ranting about "being there" for the black woman. Then devolves into referencing, repeatedly, women. Not black women but women. And right along side that is the references to men as a gender. Perhaps try to keep up instead of defending the silencing of male victims.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:01 AM
4

It's interesting that you can't seem to grasp that your entire argument relies on "saying it's irrational is only proving their point". Here, let me counter your point. No. Not it isn't. Now we're at an empasse. Both of us are using an argument that carries as much weight as the other, ensuring neither is correct or false. Which is why the entire point is that there should be evidence and basic logic deciding where it applies rather than a blanket statement based ENTIRELY on circular reasoning. …
/r/MensRights11/12/14 07:55 AM
3

It's amazing that you can quote the in-context version, in which it just further proves our point, and genuinely think it makes her look less bad.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:09 PM
3

It's pretty disturbing that they started out trying to paint it as a black issue in the shadow of these protests and then managed to make it about white women as well.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:12 AM
2

It's not a fair argument. It's the same god damned fallacy everyone always brings up every time they want to deflect criticism from a shitty piece of entertainment. Dragonball: Evolution got it. Avatar: The Last Airbender movie got it. "But wait until it comes out" is the most absurd freakin' things to ever be listened to when it comes to actually making something good. It's akin to saying "just let this unreformed arsonist hang around your place with a box of matches and fuel. We don't know if …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:49 PM
2

He issue with it was that it wasn't female friendly because the controls were too hard for women. Take of that what you will.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:45 PM
3

Her core issue that she wants to bring to into her consultancy for Mirrors Edge 2 is to "make the game easier for girls" by "making the controls not so hard". Now if that hasn't fucking sunk in yet, her ideas about how the game should work are being paid for and listened to by the creators of the game. Her ideas? TO REMOVE THE VERY FUCKING MECHANICS THAT MADE THE FIRST GAME SO WELL LOVED AND REPLAYED. So, explain again how this isn't an issue regardless of ALL the other shit everybody is mention…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:36 PM
6

...no? Apart from, presumably, the first fleet there have been both male and female colonists since it started.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 11:58 AM
26

Exactly. Here in Australia they're running off of the "2 women are killed every week" lie as well to push their bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:05 AM
19

It originally began before the Elliot Rodgers thing. It wasn't MRA related but it was used by women and men in response to rabid sexist feminists claiming all men are responsible for whatever new thing they blame on men. It was heavily used, not as a hashtag, but as a legitimate factual complaint ("not all men are like that") to feminists going on massive sexist and bigoted rants after the Elliot Rodgers shooting. Twitter was awash in these misandrists flat out blaming men, unironically and unap…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:30 AM
21

The original post (on 'Unpacking the F Word') included the hashtage #notallsharks Odd. They're attempting to use it to compare the factual #notallmen hashtag as an insult. While failing to grasp the fact that their position is actually claiming sharks shouldn't be culled. They have no logic at this stage.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:24 AM
2

President of France
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:05 AM
3

Then i'm sure those people can get on disability, since the pain is physically that bad that they can't move. Problem is that it's not. That actual pain is an extreme minority. But it's amazing, just how various people claim they are genetically unable to lose weight, how many people claim to be part of that extreme minority.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:11 AM
11

Strangely shit like this doesn't go viral and is hardly noticed. But a man punching a woman in self-defense shows that "a culture of violence against women" does.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:18 AM
4

It quite literally doesn't go away if we ignore it. We've tried that and Archelexus' logic fails every time. Ignoring these people gives them free reign to gather support because there's no god damned dissent to oppose them.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:17 PM
1

Whoops. Don't know why this didn't show up in the search, it was posted already.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:56 AM
2

You can more than make that argument. Forced labour, slavery, exists overwhelmingly in non-sex work related industry. The overwhelming amount of forced labour in nations like Sweden, that implement this stupid law, are from immigrant criminal organisations (which is odd, as the claim they make is "pretty white people" are forced into being slaves) with immigrants (usually illegal, yet strangely they aren't protected under these laws and get deported if they report the crimes...hence why these cr…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:21 AM
1

A few months ago I read that Sweden was seriously pushing the Norwegian model onto Ireland. I see they're actually succeeding. I'm sure the rise in violence against prostitutes that accompanies this idiotic model, because surprise fucking surprise it drives it underground and makes it dangerous, will benefit them sooo much.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:06 AM
3

Now I would like everyone to do something here. You need to write down this girls name, Kaelyn Polick-Kirkpatrick, and remember it. You need to remember it. This girl works for a Uni newspaper and will likely want to take part in the media for a career later in life. Such blatant sexism being supported by the school newspaper shows that she also has defenders in amongst the staff, likely high ranking or even school officials. This means she will be getting recommendations after school for other …
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:01 AM
1

Hmm, isn't it odd. Both you and PHon777 have removed your accounts, right after a hilarious fake picture (which, if you actually look up the posts you use show that the user deleted their own posts and everyone in the various threads point it out). Even when you feminists attempt to shill you fail miserably.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:24 AM
0

I know dynasties still exist. But encouraging them as policy? That's reversing the current trend of companies passing the torch to senior members after death or on retirement, which allows reform.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 08:12 AM
19

The only thing this will do is get the CEO's mindless daughter as a board member voting how she's told with out thought because Daddy told her to. (And if his daughter isn't a mindless debutant he will find a wife/sister/mother/cousin that is and will obey without question) Actually, literally this. Worse is that it will create dynasties, which amass power and money much more easily and are a lot harder to destroy once they become a destructive and corrupt monopoly.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 10:00 PM
7

Whoa-ho-ho now. I remember when this article first came out. And there was an overwhelming amount of comments refuting the authors claims and pointing out how absurd the article was. I notice that the author has deleted a shitload of these posts. Very telling.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:53 PM
2

Outstanding. Thankye.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 09:49 AM
6

Niczar's right, men should be able to force women to have their children as well. Right? Riiiiight?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:31 AM
1

Yet feminists bring up a subject and directly blame it on men? "This topic we've made about men has nothing to do with men, stop bringing men up even though we're blaming men for everything in this article"
/r/MensRights21/11/14 11:18 AM
2

It disturbs me on a basic human sociology level that people can't seem to grasp even the basics of places like 8chan/halfchan. "Someone posts child porn, which is immediately removed, on a public and unrestricted messageboard! This means that entire site supports child porn!" It's as absurd as peoples insane inability to grasp the concept of Anonymous. Even when you point out that it directly relates to the fact their identity is anonymous.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:17 AM
1

Feminist on national TV spouting that nonsense while a bunch of feminists, all highest rated comments, agree and rip into men. Please let us know how many feminists it's going to take before feminism is officially re-defined?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:13 AM
0

Wow. Vote brigade hit this pretty hard. Mysteriously all the top voted comments haven't posted on /r/mensrights for months. Nothing to see here guys. Going to prison for photos you legally own is alright. Can't ever say otherwise. God damn these feminists are pathetic.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:46 AM
1

Posting a picture of your ex drunk in the street causes the same amount of "harm" and is entirely legal. That the picture was of himself as well is completely shutting down your claim of "harm". You can't declare everything to be harm just because a woman is stating so. He legally took, owned and posted the photo of himself and his (then) girlfriend. But apparently her getting upset after the fact is enough to send someone to jail for a year. Over a profile picture photo, not a deliberate direct…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:12 AM
3

Her anecdotal claims that he is a scumbag? Oh boy, there's no way she could be lying at aaaall.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:23 AM
38

tumblr feminist Yeah, this isn't Tumblr. These are national media outlets claiming a shirt, made by a woman, reluctantly worn by a friend, after a triumph in human scientific advancement, while completely ignoring the female lead scientist, is "holding women back from science". Not blogs. Not tumblr. Not Facebook groups. Multi-million dollar media corporations. Not to mention the fucking multitude of major feminist organisations sharing and agreeing with these ridiculous articles.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:01 AM
3

Exactly. What these feminists don't get is that we're not the opposite. When we say "what would happen if a woman was wearing a shirt with buff men?" we aren't saying the buff men shirt is bad, we're pointing out their insane hypocrisy regarding genders.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:14 AM
2

Actually, he's being downvoted because he is contributing absolutely nothing to the thread and is in fact deliberately ignoring the article. It's literally the reason downvoting exists according to Reddit.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:28 AM
1

American laws are drastically more vague. She has not mentioned him by name or gone to directly see him, so she isn't violating the law. Problem is that there is no doubt she has told her feminist friends. So this guy would be getting further increased harassment.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:02 AM
47

A few facts regarding this Emma Sulkowicz piece of shit. She did go to the police She dropped the case She dropped the case because, in her literal own words, the detective phoning her up to ask her questions and asking her to come into the station for an interview is "mishandling her case" She states repeatedly in interviews that police didn't want to deal with her and thought her case was bullshit. Yet in the same interview she states that police were very enthusiastic to help her through the …
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:47 PM
39

It's hilarious that feminists tend to be so behind the times. 4chan is now run by SJW's. Everyone's over at 8chan now.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 08:21 AM
1

Not all feminists are like that? Oh, we know. The problem is that the vast majority are, along with the vast majority of feminist organisations. So perhaps, instead of explaining to us, of all people, why not all feminists are like that...perhaps attack the feminists supporting her, hmm?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:06 AM
2

We're talking about how the article specifically left out that it went on until she was 17. We're talking about that because they are now claiming it was "just looking", despite the book contradicting them flat out. We're talking about it because that's the entire point, that they are making up bullshit while the book itself not only refutes their claim (in Dunhams own words no less) but shows it went on until way after being a child.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:05 AM
1

Ah yes, 17 year olds are "kids" now. Feminist logic.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:02 AM
9

She specifically details she touched her. She pushed her finger inside. And where this article goes "it's just a young child thing" they deliberately keep leaving out this shit went on until she was god damned 17. Worse still is that her sister has come out and detailed that the only huge arguments they ever have are to do with Dunham molesting her when she was a child.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:16 PM
3

Oh boy, less than 24 hours and the comment section is already closed because it was refuting her idiocy.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 07:56 AM
1

The beginning of articles regarding it: https://archive.today/4lo4L As you can see, they quite literally think domestic violence against women is torture.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:10 PM
4

I thought so to for a while but it has drastically picked up over in the eastern states in the last 2 years. We've already had mens rights groups kicked out of Uni for supporting mens rights. They are steadily growing in power in universities, which is exactly how they took political power years down the track in the United States.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:10 PM
145

Watch them spew claims of sexism and "trying to take the vote away from women" when they find out that not signing up for SS relates to their ability to vote.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:45 PM
13

Not in the majority of the Western world. You have joint assets, it doesn't mean your wife owns absolutely half of everything that's yours. Otherwise your personal stuff would be half hers. She can be directly shown that she did not earn any of those billions. At the very most, even in a fucked up system, she might have some entitlement to remain in the same standard of living. Which is far, far, far less than a billion dollars. Yet here she recieves a billion dollars for...literally no reason. …
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:40 AM
2

Whoa-ho-ho! When this first hit I thought it was incredibly moronic of AVFM to have pulled this stunt and taken the domain. While I completely agreed with all of their complaints about the White Ribbon campaign and it's deliberate sexist attitudes towards men, and I completely supported the non-sexist male and female domestic violence victim supporting direction they were taking the site in, I found it absolutely idiotic PR for them to have acted like this. It was childish and made the MRM look …
/r/MensRights10/11/14 02:13 AM
26

Specifically refers to the feminists in their shaming campaign, refuting the idea that it was "The Patriarchy" that was the only support of the White Feather idiocy OMG WHY DO YOU HATE WOMENS! We don't hate women. Many MRA's are women. Perhaps it's high time you feminists get it out of your head that 'feminism equates to women'. Because it certainly doesn't and is in fact causing women harm.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:39 AM
0

Ah yes, the article goes on to state that the shooting is clearly a womens issue (repeatedly)...but you declare the inclusion of "7 dead" and no mention of the males killed to back your claims here? So, exactly how is this a "womens issue" if they're not deliberately ignoring that? Especially considering countless feminist sites posted this same "7 victims" idiocy immediately after the shootings, while this article carries on from that as well. But no relevance at aaaaaall, eh?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:15 AM
7

The sad thing is that they're literally not. And every time people have brought up campaigns to push that message, they have been stopped by feminists.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:16 AM
1

Who they are not referring to. They genuinely still think Elliot Rodgers killed 7 people.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:15 AM
8

I watch my drink and i'm a man. Because people fuck around with drinks. It's called crime and it's gender neutral, I wish these idiots would grasp that.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:18 AM
5

Notice that they're not only running with the deliberate murder of 4 men and making it about only a womans issue with 2 women killed but they've magically created a 7th victim.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:54 AM
3

It's truly disgusting how much vote brigading these misandrist assholes are pulling over in that thread with impunity. Can anyone confirm if it has been taken off of the front page as well? It appeared and then later in the thread the OP was notified it was removed, they're trying to message the mods but no reply so far.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:16 AM
3

One of the largest feminist organizations, NOW, opposes shared custody in cases where no abuse or even claims of abuse have occurred. Currently, in the United States, a bunch of feminist organizations are opposing any effort to reform custody laws to protect children and fathers from the exact same shit in this documentary. BUT PLEASE, do go on about how it's just everything else besides feminism that is behind these issues being fixed and these lives being repaired. Next we'll see feminists bla…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 01:50 PM
7

Disgusting. They're still pushing the blatant fucking lie that women make less than men? Implement your piece of shit sexist taxes. Then watch as men take it to court to have it officially removed because it violates repeated gender equality laws by targeting an entire gender for a factually and thoroughly refuted claim that men as a gender are not responsible for.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:35 AM
1

One of the largest media organisations in Australia. Declaring people who sexually harass and physically attack women to be, despite the opposite, Mens Rights Activists. But no, no, clearly you shouldn't care. Not in /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:43 AM
4

And what relevance is that? PUA's are still not MRA's, regardless of what anyone thinks of PUA's.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:46 AM
2

A little early for the feminist downvote bridage? Don't like facts being pointed out? PUA's aren't MRA's. When both sides think PUA's aren't MRA's, you calling them such doesn't change reality.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:48 AM
2

It's actually really fucked up. It was 1 in 10. Then 1 in 7. Then 1 in 5. Then 1 in 4. Now 1 in 3. It's almost as hilarious as their "one woman is killed a week" idiocy. Morons, if you think one woman killed a week is terrible...check out how many men are killed by their partners. Hint: It's the same fucking number, if not more. One person killed a week is a damn fine statistic, it means crime is significantly low.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:26 AM
2

Perhaps you can come back when the mens rights organisations that exist are misogynist. Every group has crazies. But we can show that overwhelmingly feminists, as a group, oppose rights for men and spout clearly misogynist ignorance. But hey, that's unfair, "you can't base a group on it's members". Sure, can totally get behind that. Which is why we base it on it's organisations that claim to represent feminism. Which, OVERWHELMINGLY (ie not a freakin' minority in any stretch of the imagination) …
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:52 AM
9

they are men and they are physically bigger than you ... THEREFORE THEY HAVE A STRONG TRACK RECORD THAT THEY MIGHT RAPE YOU! Feminist logic, ladies and gentlemen. Not only are they likely going to rape you. But they, simply being male, have a strong track record of rape.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:09 AM
2

Can we get a re-re-upload video? The feminists have taken down both the re-upload and the re-upload on other channels.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:53 AM
2

Yes but that's what they've been doing all along. The mens rights movement has gained power specifically through those who witness blatant bullshit like that, question it, look up the facts and then react accordingly when all of their fellows then attack them for pointing out the objective facts. It's a slow process. But it is a strong process. I'd rather have hard, logical, rational people at the core before it eventually pushes out into the mainstream and people simply follow it because they s…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:11 AM
34

A quick search of Barcelonas womens rights disproves their claims. They have paid maternity leave, they have equal pay, they have multiple women-centric anti-violence laws. Quite literally nothing they claim is true. Which would be why they're latching onto "we want to end the Patriarchy", as they have no legitimate complaints in any remote way. I really hope this news does hit the West. Might be a good wakeup call to people about how ridiculous feminists are. It's just sad that they took over a…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:06 PM
16

Walking through the ghetto and getting talked to? Not a single one actually harassing her and only two people followed her in a neighbourhood she was likely to be freakin' mugged in. Laughing so hard that it took them 10 hours to get that.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:58 AM
1

For some reason the rest of the title got cut off. It was "Been seeing it on a bunch of feminist news feeds".
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:32 AM
0

It would be a bit pointless if the very first question was "were you forced to have sex". It's defining what particular sexual activities would be included in consensual or non-consensual sex, not if it's immediately rape. So "made to penetrate" is the correct term. As the same would occur if it was cunnilingus or being made to insert any part of your body into someone else.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:50 PM
1

Made to penetrate specifically covers this.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:48 PM
1

Often the definition of rape or sexual assault or aggravated sexual battery or whatever the kids are calling it these days, starts off with a required "sexual intent" in that first bubble. For example a parent putting a toothbrush in a kids mouth is not considered rape even though it's penetration of the mouth of someone who is under age. Which is why the insertion of objects specifically states "sexually". On the other hand when you said that prior consent for sex with someone who is unconsciou…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:19 PM
2

What? No, where does that connect?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:34 PM
3

Yes, i'm going to have to add them individually. The program I used didn't allow for that. Very annoying.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:51 AM
2

If they've consented to what's going to happen beforehand, then it's not a blanket permission to do whatever you want. Only within the parameters of what was consented to. It goes straight to 'Not Rape' because they are incapacitated or unconscious, they aren't able to revoke consent due to physically being unable to communicate. Otherwise they wouldn't be incapacitated or unconscious.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:41 AM
3

My girlfriend just jokingly said... See, you've got a progression of yeses and noes, that's the problem. What if someone says yes when they mean no? Better just make all the answers no and end it with "Yes it's rape"
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:08 AM
1

The video has been all over this subreddit but you've deleted most of them? There's only one available video found and it was hardly noticed at all, either from being buried due to timezone posting or being shilled down. This is a 100% mens rights issue from an anti-mra group in which they are blatantly brainwashing children with anti-male and bullshit rape statistics and pay gap lies. So why are these threads being deleted? Flooding means that we have a significant amount of information regardi…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:29 PM
1

Link to these other threads or have you deleted them as well?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:21 PM
1

...how in the flying fuck do you list that and then turn around and claim the title was misleading? The man was called a pervert, then is reported to the police as a sexual molester. Then the police interrogate him. Twice. That they let him go because they legally had to and he did absolutely nothing wrong in the first place doesn't make the title misleading. Especially when they, given the immediate facts of the situation and knowing what is required (as they would've done first aid training), …
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:54 PM
2

Pathetic. GamerGate has always been about journalistic ethics. That feminists have jumped in on the anti-gamergate side and been pushing that any and all criticism of liars, frauds and corrupt game notorieties who happen to be women is "misogyny" doesn't change anything other than now feminists have included extremist SJW feminism in GamerGates long list of haters. GamerGate has many feminists in it that oppose the SJW feminists raging against GamerGate. Just as it has many MRA's. They are suppo…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:05 AM
5

Ditto. But...i've also seen a huge increase in women joining the MRM or becoming Anti-Feminists. It's weird.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:57 AM
0

Ah yes, apart from where that claim has been thoroughly refuted. By the police department. But please, keep linking us with unconfirmed claims by Polygon.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 03:31 AM
1

Hahaha, everything you described as "not happening to others" is LITERALLY what happened to Jack Thompson.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:51 AM
1

We've got multiple different threats from feminists at the Men's Rights conference directed at staff. Yet NAFALT.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:57 PM
2

You must have missed the part where Anita repeatedly claims she reported to the local police, a refuted lie, before someone else (not her) contacted the FBI to ask them. You must have missed the part where the FBI didn't state she contacted them regarding the threat, only that they had been contacted by her in the past. Probably to do with the child porn she idiotically retweeted. So no, no she hasn't been "vindicated" yet. As her claims were not backed and the FBI didn't corroborate that they c…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:54 PM
3

Reading comprehension isn't really your thing is it. But I'm sure if you ignore the rest of the article in which she complains men can't be victims and don't suffer the majority of violence it will magically give you a point after you selectively quote mine one section...even though before and after that quote she rips into men daring to say they can be victims.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:44 AM
2

What act? Right now we have a letter so obviously fraudulent and hilariously fake looking being sent in the most ridiculous of scenarios. That is worthy of severe skepticism in ANY case. That she's turned around and blamed it on GamerGate, despite quite literally no reference to it ANYWHERE, shows her bullshit even further. Men's rights isn't about "not looking bad". Not a single person here or in GamerGate condones the threat, real or fake. We ALL oppose anyone being threatened this way. So we …
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:35 AM
6

Strangely her followers don't seen to question that someone who blatantly states they have pipe bombs and are ready to attack the school is going is going to say "I hate all feminists, I want to kill all feminists in my school and kill the women's lib class" and then turn around and say "but I'm ONLY going to kill people if this little known Youtube feminist shows up, otherwise you're all good and I won't shoot anyone". Let alone question why they would warn people AND say they go there.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:30 AM
1

At this point we don't know if she contacted the FBI over her alleged threats. Only that she did contact the FBI. And given she did contact them over the child porn she was stupid enough to retweet, the timeline seems more than likely to have been then. It hasn't been confirmed either way and she has already been refuted about her claims she contacted the local authorities.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:25 AM
0

I linked directly to their website and directly quoted a flat out false claim. So no.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:03 PM
7

omg you're saying all women And once again someone shows us the inherent stupidity within feminism. Sorry, screaming that "you're attacking women!" with "feminism = women" isn't going to change the users specific posts detailing nothing against women or women in general.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:59 PM
-1

Feminists begin outraged campaign to remove "slut shaming, rape culture, misogynistic female sign", while leaving the male version, in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:46 AM
7

Whoa, fucking whoa! How the hell is this an ACLU thing? I'm truly shocked. The ACLU has defended Nazis and civil right protesters alike. They've always stuck by their civil liberties direction even when they lost a heap of people to defending hardcore right wing extremists, how in the god damned world are they taken over by feminists all of a sudden?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:53 AM
41

The YWCA website is just as pathetic. The issue of violence against women remains urgent and widespread: in Australia, 1 in 3 women experience physical violence in their life and 1 in 5 women experience sexual violence. Yep, apparently it's only an issue for women. Despite men suffering overwhelmingly worse in those areas, even if we didn't ignore the factually false claims of "1 in 3" and "1 in 5". So the organisation that is meant to be helping fight sexisn is flat out denying men any help for…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:45 AM
20

I urge everyone to comment on the original article and refute her bullshit. Even if she deletes it, many people will see it first.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:39 AM
1

Voluntary is one thing. This money is going to a lobby group that actually pushes for anti-male laws and regulations. So no, it's not a simple matter of "oh it's their money".
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:41 AM
1

And remember, police giving you advice to all genders on how to stay safe means that they would DOUBLE not believe her rape compared to when she didn't tell them years ago.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 05:26 AM
1

Isn't this type of scam illegal?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:59 AM
7

I feel that most MRAers have our backs. Ironically i've noticed MRA's support trans rights for all genders, while feminists keep finding themselves either flat out transphobic or hating whichever version is more "masculine" to that particular feminist group at the time.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:30 AM
9

I'd say literally all are false. The ones that "aren't" are pretty much addressed as much as they can be by men's rights but are unrelated to men's rights (racism, etc) and are also completely unrelated to feminism.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:04 AM
26

I've seen the site they linked for a while, it's a legitimate page. So is the group that shared it. They are just that ignorant and insane.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:02 AM
0

the allegations look shonky, but since so much info is either second/third hand or looks shopped. i am withholding judgement till i hear something more concrete before i get off the fence. Since when have we held back judgement when the allegation is anonymous and lacks any and all evidence and yet is ALREADY destroying the life of the person accused? There is literally no evidence and so far the only actual claim, that he was arrested for sexual assault, was refuted by the LAPD. By that logic, …
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:00 AM
5

How odd. All of my posts have been downvoted in the last few minutes without any comments. Downvote brigades have arrived.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:45 PM
1

All information can be found in this thread. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2icijr/facts_surrounding_sam_pepper_case_part_1_of_3/
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:51 PM
1

Reverse plot twice: Sam had his female friends make the anonymous rape claims so that he could reveal them after Laci goes apeshit to further prove his point.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:15 AM
0

Part 3 of 3 It just overwhelming looks like Sam Pepper did indeed create a anti-domestic violent viral video that feminists just couldn't stand and decided to smear him over. Worse still, they are now supporting blatantly false rape allegations to do so. Let me be the first to say that i've wanted to punch Sam Pepper in the face since he first starred in Big Brother. But unfortunately for feminists like Laci Green, having a punchable face does NOT mean we get to lynch them because they say males…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:59 AM
1

Second half of Part 2 of 3 Laci Green: Claims that Sam Pepper has threatened her over email. The facts: Sam Pepper denied this was his email. He then pointed out people have been spoofing his details and pretending to be him since this started Laci Green had confirmed that she was contacted by her legal department over it, she has since been very specific about her original claims using words such as "if it is actually" and "it could be" when speaking of those claiming to be Sam Pepper. Unconfir…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:58 AM
2

First half of Part 2 of 3 Allegations Dottie Martin: A Youtuber called ThisBeDottie that has uploaded such videos as 'How To Stop Time', 'Creatures Found In Head', 'Dragons Are Real' and 'How To Be Emo' uploaded a video called 'Cautionary Tale' after the final reveal video of Sam Peppers three part series. At the very start of the video she goes into specific detail that when this allegation "occurred", it was 6 months before she was dating her current boyfriend (an odd thing to include). In her…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter