TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhiskeySeven Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by WhiskeySeven on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah I've unsubscribed because of this. I used to give advice and lurk and I enjoy reading field reports and get a kick out of them... but christ this is all so sad. So very, very sad.
/r/seduction03/10/18 10:49 AM
1

Read what more successful people who match your personality did, and imitate them. Practice makes perfect. Fake it till you make it. That sorta thing. It isn't rocket science.
/r/seduction24/09/18 03:46 PM
70

Jesus Christ. The state of you, the state of this place. You're a psychopath.
/r/seduction06/09/18 06:33 PM
0

Consider that men are horny as hell and will fuck anyone. Why wouldn't a girl that wants to get laid leverage that? Is sex reserved for only men?
/r/seduction02/09/18 02:01 PM
1

Human beings are not inanimate objects and possess agency. The lock key thing is a crude joke at best. The ease with which someone gets sex (if that is what they want) is completely immaterial to their character. Come on, that's a ridiculous prejudice to have.
/r/seduction02/09/18 12:24 AM
1

The difficulty doesn't matter. What makes you better than someone else using literally the same platform as you (Tinder) to do literally the same thing as you (get laid; meet people)? I don't get this thinking at all.
/r/seduction01/09/18 07:39 PM
8

You'd fuck 5 different girls, if you could manage to. What makes you better than her?
/r/seduction01/09/18 07:21 PM
2

What part? The first claim is a known psychological (neurological) phenomenon, I forget the name of it and my psychologist friend hasn't responded to my messages. But what it means is pretty straight-forward: (a) "You can't teach an old dog new tricks." What does that imply? It implies younger dogs can learn new tricks, that they're more willing or more capable of adapting in general. A young person can learn things and change their personality drastically. It happens all the time. It's taken fo…
/r/seduction29/08/18 07:56 PM
2

Seems anecdotal, but to each their own. It's human dynamics, especially young people. You can't expect young people to be rational about these things and if they keep at it over and over it'll become a near-permanent habit into their 20s and so on. It's easier to self-improve/self-adjust than it is to completely change friend groups at any age - especially at 17 too. That's why I argued what I did.
/r/seduction29/08/18 07:05 PM
2

Look up indicators of interest, it's a really basic concept. People, when aroused or interested, give off all sorts of signs and queues. Most of the time, it's a guy trying to detect IOIs before making a next move or escalation but it works the other way too. And not just in seduction - in any human interaction it helps to notice them.
/r/seduction29/08/18 05:56 PM
93

Most people actually assume roles and perform according to them. Ever heard of the thing where someone multilingual has a different personality when they speak one language versus another? It's about the embedded tendency within all of us for performance. You assume a certain role and they assume another one. As /u/Elmolero said, it could be that you actually encourage these dynamics through unconscious tendencies. A lot of seduction and human dynamics is essentially mimicry. You imitate what yo…
/r/seduction29/08/18 11:56 AM
20

The Alpha/Beta thing is really stupid and falls apart after scrutiny. Human beings aren't dogs and not even dogs have such dynamics. Think for yourself, think clearly - human dynamics don't work in such a way.
/r/seduction29/08/18 11:39 AM
3

I mean I know it really pays the good money but is it really worth it? Eternal question In many countries, being a doctor doesn't pay all that well at all actually. It's food for thought.
/r/seduction29/08/18 11:03 AM
18

It's tough to enter, tough to stay in, and tough to leave. It requires single-minded attention most of the times - that means either extremely competent people who get bored easily or extremely normal people who have no time in their heads for anything else.
/r/seduction29/08/18 10:45 AM
2

Ever heard of IOIs?
/r/seduction29/08/18 05:45 AM
9

Then there is no point to go out in the world if you want the spoils but refuse to risk enduring a simple rejection. Not heartbreak, not poverty, not physical pain... but a rejection?! No one simply owes you their time or attention, much less their love and sex.
/r/seduction28/08/18 01:34 PM
37

After meeting new people and figuring out if you're intested, the key takeaway is TO SHOW INTEREST. Preferably show through physical or non-verbal means. Indicators of interest they're called, no? Most people are too fearful to do that, and then they wonder why all their bluster and arrogance and cockiness doesn't come across or makes them look like an unattractive, inauthentic dickhead. It's pretty much what is implied when folks talk about inner game but I guess it needs to be said. Someone wh…
/r/seduction28/08/18 01:20 PM
8

It's not a waste of your time necessarily. She wasn't convinced by you despite you having two weeks to do it. You're not going to win everybody over. Maybe you can learn a lesson and get better at it going forward. Maybe you did everything right and she just didn't want to date you or see you again for reasons that are entirely personal to her. In either case, you didn't waste your time. If you did everything perfect, that's great, it's good practice. Keep it up. If not, learn from it and get be…
/r/seduction10/08/18 08:14 PM
33

An answer like “I understand that you aren’t feeling too great about this and want us to be friends. Im sure we will both find someone that match our needs. Have a great week end “ That's weak as hell. You're not giving any credit to OP here, dude needed to handle that (untimely) rejection on his own terms and he did. I'm not saying it's an ideal response (because like you noticed, it isn't) but it's a fine response.
/r/seduction10/08/18 07:51 PM
2

Definitely. I'm just saying that it's not extraordinary - as in, it's not being most people's reach.
/r/seduction31/07/18 03:05 PM
2

It's pretty much one every other week. Not bad. Not particularly impressive either imo.
/r/seduction31/07/18 12:34 PM
1

You're projecting.
/r/seduction29/06/18 11:00 AM
0

My ass. Most people want to find steady partners. Some degenerates are driven to banging as much as they can and even they deceive themselves into thinking that they'd want to settle down at the right time. Besides, nothing I said runs contrary to "Gaming". Completed persons are more comfortable meeting new people and seducing them.
/r/seduction27/06/18 11:06 AM
2

Why should it hurt? Move on or get back in touch with her and try again. Who gives a shit, no one is keeping score and you shouldn't either.
/r/seduction26/06/18 09:26 AM
1

Yes. That IS the setting. She hired a guy to drive her and she sits in the back, probably on her phone. But what you're forgetting is the guy. Imagine he was a Brad Pitt level bloke. Hell, let's imagine it's him and it's his hobby to drive an Uber once a week. Do you think your girl will still be bored and on her phone? Fuck no. Her usual fare is to be the bored sleepy girl. But now, with this ridiculously handsome man driving her, she finds herself mildly excited, as if she had a cup of coffee.…
/r/seduction26/06/18 09:04 AM
1

The golden rule is kind of weird in that regard. Normal adjusted people will already be doing that kind of thing. Creepy weirdos won't really benefit from it since they don't have the reference experiences necessary to help them understand which particular act is creepy and which one is not. That's why I think it's best to tell our semi-adjusted "rookies" to be cognizant of how they want to be treated (or what they would respond to) and to do that. It's the most fundamental way to get guys not t…
/r/seduction26/06/18 07:46 AM
1

I disagree with your first two sentences in some ways but agree with your overall argument. I think "rookies" at picking up are far likelier to be shitty, creepy, and generally awful if they don't respect the agency and humanity of their intended target. It's a better catch-all to say to them "hey, if you want to pick someone up don't go all-in with your cock and balls and ignore that they're also a person" My girlfriend takes UBER a lot and she gets hit on by the drivers sometimes. She can't un…
/r/seduction26/06/18 07:14 AM
40

It seems complicated because there's a ton of misinformed retards peddling half-baked garbage to other misinformed retards. If meeting people and having a social life seems like a circus to you, it's because you're acting like a clown. Of course the "my fair lady" shit doesn't work today, times change and so do cultural and societal norms. That doesn't mean it was any more or less complicated. Society has opened up, people are more direct and open than ever and that means it is both easier to me…
/r/seduction25/06/18 06:40 AM
1

Ever heard of "the blind leading the blind"? This is it.
/r/seduction17/06/18 11:02 PM
0

Totally agreed. Being in the moment, super confident in self, and touchy is how it works at clubs. Especially on the dance floor, where for me it's still a crapshoot. But that's not the reality most reddit seduction readers face, look at OP. They simply can't bring themselves to do that, much less doing it actually right.
/r/seduction27/03/18 05:19 AM
1

I'm at a point now if I'm on the dance floor I can open with instant make outs and finger fucking. Is the creepy to you? I can finger fuck girls before we even say are first words. I don't do this all the time only when I sense it will work because you need calibration. You don't make it seem like it's only 3 times. I agree with your post actually. And the VIP is better for getting laid, I know. I think this community going overboard with the "stare her down to figure out if she's into you" thin…
/r/seduction27/03/18 05:16 AM
1

Read my post, tell me if you disagree.
/r/seduction27/03/18 05:14 AM
1

Who's talking about censorship?? I'm saying don't encourage rookies and incels to molest women in public. That's not good advice.
/r/seduction27/03/18 05:14 AM
3

There's a fine line between his philosophy (which is good, actually - I upvoted him for that) and what he's implying with his actions and suggestions. Nobody should finger a girl on a dancefloor. But if they must, they better know what they're doing and not be lurking reddit seduction forums. Telling rank amateurs and insecure and unaware guys to get sexually adventurous and aggressive is unleashing a myriad of actual, literal rapists into society. I know the kind of people that do that (not my …
/r/seduction26/03/18 04:50 PM
1

I don't do this all the time only when I sense it will work because you need calibration. Tell me this - how many times have you been turned down? How'd it go?
/r/seduction26/03/18 04:46 PM
0

That's your big challenge?
/r/seduction13/03/18 11:40 AM
1

Everyone enhances their appearance. Even wild animals do. That's reality, that's the whole point.
/r/seduction13/03/18 11:38 AM
11

Hey fuck you too buddy
/r/seduction08/07/17 02:30 PM
7

Oh to be 21 again. Kudos OP, I know writing in a second or third language is hard. Good luck, and remember to be fair and respectful.
/r/seduction10/02/16 06:19 PM
2

Two responses come to mind: You're worthless if you think closing means only getting a girl's number. I can't remember the last time closing didn't mean either a)hooking up or b)making plans. Oooooor See how the above was mean spirited? Someone people don't need to get someone's number to have a good chat and feel good about themselves. Maybe the sexual chemistry wasn't there but the conversation was stimulating enough to continue. Maybe maybe maybe. Your approach to this is sophomoric and it wi…
/r/seduction27/12/15 08:57 AM
2

I'm not speaking about actual energy dude. Holy crap why can't you understand this perspective. You know the concept of 'Fake it till you make it'? You know the concept of mental frames? This is the same thing - being able to, on a dime, act up-tempo is a thing people can do. I, and others, call it a skill because it's a damn impressive and useful thing people can do.
/r/seduction22/11/15 01:21 PM
3

There was no argument to begin with. You disagree with a minor, minor term and called me and other idiots for it. How's that working out for you?
/r/seduction22/11/15 01:14 PM
3

You're repeating yourself you autist. It's a skill - fake it till you make it, or whatever. Get outta here you sound like an incel.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:37 PM
1

The skill is being able to fake/generate high-energy when you go out. It has nothing to do with metabolism and diet. Being on, active, up-tempo etc is a desirable thing and I have friends who, as soon as they enter 'party mode' are just on and don't turn it off until the night is over. That's as much of a going-out skill as being able to juggle conversations and escalate physicality or whatever. If you disagree, so be it.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:29 PM
1

I've just explained that being able to turn on energy, out of thin air, is as good as a skill. You don't have to call anyone an idiot because you disagree.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:24 PM
1

Could she tell you did a lot of 'work'? Maybe it's better to be a bit cooler moving forward? I don't know how it is in your culture, just wondering.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:20 PM
2

Being able to turn on energy and 'generate' it on a dime is most definitely desired AND A SKILL. I have friends who are always 'on' and it makes me look and feel like a slug sometimes. I just like to chill and smile and throw some jokes out but they're dancing, yelling, and generally up-tempo. And I know we started the night off on the same foot and have taken the same drinks so it's not like they're always on coke or something. It's a skill. You didn't have to downvote me for engaging with you.…
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:18 PM
1

It really depends on how you experienced the night with her man. I'm sure it sounds better in your native tongue but the fact is you're still framing it from that experience where, in all likelihood, she's moved on. That night is over, I'd say don't dwell on it. But it is cute so it's not the worst. but I'm not you and I didn't have that make-out with the girl so it's your call. Trust yourself man, just be informed :)
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:16 PM
2

I have a friend who has to be the centre of attention every time. I'm a confident, outspoken guy (probably have done this AMOG thing to my own friends unwillingly) but this other guy, Matt, he's literally a comedian and a narcissist. It's impossible sometimes to go out with him. What I did is step back and crack jokes, not mean ones but funny ones, at him toward a girl I liked and then divert their attention away into a 1-on-1. Basically you either have to be as loud and direct as they are, whic…
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:04 PM
2

This isn't bad advice actually. 5 dudes hounding a group of girls is awful anyway.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:01 PM
2

Bringing energy into a night out is most definitely desired.
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:01 PM
1

It's okay. You miss every shot you don't take - sometimes she might really really like you but have something else going on (test, work, family issues, etc.) and decline and that's it. That's why soul-mates don't exist, people are fit for each other at different times in their lives and it's all based on circumstance and luck and chance. What you can do to reduce the chances of it going badly is to keep it simple, direct and honest "hey you! what's your plans this weekend?" and go from there som…
/r/seduction22/11/15 12:00 PM
1

Yeah that's it - be prepared for her to decline though, the magic could be gone.
/r/seduction22/11/15 11:48 AM
1

What do you mean blown out? Give some context. I don't like describing nights as unsuccessful because it implies that you went out to get numbers/get girls and not have a good time. Having a good time is more than that and simpler than that. But I would be frustrated if I was blown off a buncha times too - sometimes you can't 'game' and just try to have a real, aimless, pointless conversation and be au naturel.
/r/seduction22/11/15 11:46 AM
3

Indicator of interest
/r/seduction22/11/15 11:44 AM
3

Not having a car isn't really an issue if you live in a city. Can you offer some more context? Are your eyes both really bad - and, more importantly, are they "weird looking" to people? Are you shy about your eyes as well as your car situation? I take objection to the following sentence: Obviously that kinda destroyed whatever shred of confidence I had left, but can anyone here offer me some advice on how to work around it, or just tips in general? Thanks in advance, peace! And hear me out here:…
/r/seduction10/11/15 11:02 PM
1

Creepy is a very very toxic term. You know what's creepy: stalking, preying on drunk girls, bullying, intimidating, going through personal info, etc. Coming up to a girl and saying hello is almost never creepy. Staring at one? Maybe, use your critical thinking - you're the product of billions of years of evolutionary success, you didn't get here because your ancestors were hesitant or stupid. Act like it :)
/r/seduction15/07/15 11:43 PM
2

I was in Budva last summer! I'm not into the whole PUA thing to be honest but I like reading about this because it's interesting. Here's my take, and I've been reasonably successful in meeting people in recent years. Firstly: don't use or think like people ought to be seduced or that you're a seducer. It's a very weird approach. Secondly: I'm assuming you're Western/American - in which case being friendly and asking questions about the area (to locals) or about others' trips (to other tourists) …
/r/seduction15/07/15 11:41 PM
1

"Hey saw this thing we talked about that time, what's up hot stuff"
/r/seduction15/07/15 11:32 PM
1

Are you of drinking age? I know exactly what you're talking about and it sucks, you're gonna have to meet for drinks or for "the best coffee ever" at some hipster coffee shop.
/r/seduction10/06/15 06:41 AM
1

What exactly are you doing? And what exactly do you want to be doing?
/r/seduction10/06/15 06:40 AM
1

Easier said than done. He's gonna have to climb a massive amount of shit that way. I dunno what the proper answer is, I'm just glad I'm no longer his age.
/r/seduction10/06/15 06:38 AM
2

Don't be the horny dude scoping out girls to target. I mean it. Just enjoy the music, do the meerkat thing occasionally but you're there to enjoy the crowd not micromanage a pickup. In line, walking around, getting food - talk to everyone and anyone and get in state. You're bound to encounter some friendly people and if you've understood what I'm saying here you're going to meet girls that way. Then you dance and move forward that way. The pathetic hot-dogging, gum chewing, crowd-scanning dude s…
/r/seduction10/06/15 06:37 AM
46

Imagine if you had said "yeah It's okay, shit happens. How was the game?" You'd never see her again.
/r/seduction20/06/14 09:39 AM
1

This is adorable. You're going to remember this post in a few months or years and cringe (in a good way). Good job though man, it's those little battles that make up a man. It's really that easy even when you're grown up - sometimes we all have to remind ourselves that.
/r/seduction29/05/14 06:26 PM
1

Most Germans aren't circumcised.
/r/seduction29/05/14 06:21 PM
1

You should be spontaneous and instinctive in nearly every minor interaction in your life. This isn't war, you don't need strategy - just keeping your eyes open and you feet light is like 75% of human interaction right there.
/r/seduction11/04/13 05:08 PM
3

I mean that in my own experience, I'm uncomfortable and awkward when I'm constantly scanning the room, targeting someone and trying to time my approach and everything perfectly. It's not immediate, it's not instinctive and, dare I say it, "alpha". Catching someone's eye is one thing but staring at her to catch her eyes is another - and in my experience it's really poor form. You make a point that if she's not seeing you she won't know you're leering at her but there are other factors: her friend…
/r/seduction11/04/13 02:01 PM
37

With that kind of attitude why do you even bother getting out of bed in the morning?
/r/seduction10/04/13 04:52 PM
10

The wolf line is contrived and straight out of Swingers, as in it's 20 years old. But you're right the shit-test is almost always there, I find the best way around it is to just compliment them for their good taste (depending on how far along the interaction you are, of course).
/r/seduction15/09/12 01:08 PM
0

WALL OF TEXT, WHOOO HOOOO Why do you give up? If you're so convicted maybe you can support your arguments a bit more than merely repeating what you've already said in different words (although that's very academic of you though, you're a college man, I can tell!). First of all in western countries we live in historically religious cultures, which affected everything and everyone and still to this day factor into basically everything we study. 50 years from now, when students are studying early 0…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:42 AM
0

I don't find the idea offensive at all and I partly agree. There are inherent differences but the physiological ones are for easier to study and comprehend than the mental ones when we don't have the proper tools to determine what is intelligence to begin with. I hate it when people say "men might have higher IQs but women have higher EQs" - it's a crock of shit. Dworkin isn't the bastion of feminism though, if you studied up a bit you'd understand that. There are many different forces at play u…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:16 AM
–

Firstly, you've just proved my point regarding women in history. Seven historical figures, four from the 20th century, one who was a negligible figure (Marie Antoinette), one who was insane (Joan of Arc) and one we know very little of (Boudica). FROM ALL OF HISTORY. There's also Cleopatra, that idiot, Elizabeth and Victoria who were figureheads who no one looks up to and Marie Curie who radiated herself so badly that her notebook is still toxic to touch. Secondly, his entry-level gender-studies …
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:01 AM
-1

How edgy. You're a 17 20 year old who just claimed injustice because your entry-level class has a wrong title. Open your mind.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:38 PM
–

What terrifies me is the fact that there are going to be tons of people agree with you and tons more dismissing my points. How could you even think that women are inherently dumber than men? How could anyone? There are so many variables and factors from genetics to enviormental to cultural that affect cognitive ability - neither you nor I know what creates genius - so what makes you so sure that it's a biological factor? It's astonishingly closed-minded of you to say that. Dworkin is a scary fig…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:46 PM
–

You should read my entire post. Every Gender Studies course is more or less Feminist Studies. That's the way it is, OP can drop the course or he can stay in it but the reality won't change by calling a misnomer an injustice. There are ACTUAL injustices in the world of Men's Rights - I come from a textbook case of one (which is why I subbed here in the first place, my father's story would be the highest rated story here, by far) - this isn't one of them. This is a great opportunity for OP to stud…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:25 PM
–

Playing devil's advocate here: Firstly your post reads like a massive troll. What's the injustice here? You took a gender studies course OF COURSE IT'S ABOUT WOMEN. How old are you? Why are you arguing in class to begin with? Secondly for 99.5% of the entire human existence either directly or indirectly men have dominated every domain of every field. History is almost all men. Science. Art. Theater. Hell even prophets and gods are men. Gender Studies is just putting into perspective the gigantic…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:58 PM
3

It's more like there's a definite biological mother but there are many potential scenarios in which the person raising the child (other parent) isn't the biological father. If you want to expose Quebec and Canadian misandry look at custody cases and whatnot, not birth certificate forms which for all intents and purposes make a ton of sense.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:47 AM
1

What's your situation (school, work, homeschool, etc)? How do you know of him? Are either of you unattractive (be honest)?
/r/seduction01/09/12 12:46 AM
10

Don't fall in love with that first girl. I went to the same schooling you did, and had the same experiences you did before college (actually from the sounds of it, we're very very alike - except I was really skinny coming into college). General advice: Just really try to emulate the "cool" guys (not the dicks, but genuinely friendly, cool guys who have lots of friends) and you'll get it. Be nice but affirm your intentions; Make friends with people you respect and like and hang out with them ofte…
/r/seduction12/08/12 08:36 PM
6

The whole cabbage???
/r/seduction21/03/12 11:48 PM
21

Even Seal got dumped eventually
/r/seduction02/02/12 05:26 AM
8

I'm not sure that's the right way to start any introduction. Not only is it a 'yes or no question', it's also a rather dated way to approach someone. edit: typo
/r/seduction29/01/12 07:54 AM
12

Fuck this and this kind of thinking. As if all guys are normal and cognitively stable that the girls who aren't are sluts or whores. If you guys were fucking normal you wouldn't need seddit to this extent to begin with.
/r/seduction28/12/11 04:31 PM
2

You're so far removed from being a "real man" if you think it means never having to apologize. In fact, you're probably one of the asshole OPs talking about.
/r/seduction16/12/11 03:40 PM
1

If they say something or look at you cockeyed look back at them earnestly and introduce yourself. Don't show you're scared. If they insist on fighting say "I'm very sorry, I don't want to fight I'm sorry for upsetting you - how can I fix this?"
/r/seduction16/12/11 12:52 AM
–

Do you have any idea how much more prevalent and damaging beating your kids is compared to circumcision? Why don't you fucking losers rally and get all uppity against deadbeat dads, child beating and neglect and pre-natal paternal rights (which are negligent!)? Are you that penis-obsessed that you can't let it go? Fuck you I like my dick and I want my kids to be circumcised to, there's not discernible negative effect if done properly and many arguable positive ones - stop focusing on children's …
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:42 AM
1

I'm neither logical nor an MRA, whatever that is.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:27 AM
1

Well put, nothing's going to change though. It's asking too much of people to expect them to put in the extra effort when they don't NEED to, especially after they've accomplished their goal. I'm not like that, but I can understand why some people are. It makes sense to call her a HB# or whatever because you're trying to give the play-by-play to someone reading the field report, but people honestly feel this way and I'm not too sure they understand why the community exists. It's the means to an …
/r/seduction15/12/11 11:53 AM
-20

Why is there always people who give so much of a shit about circumcision? If you don't want it done to YOUR kid, don't do it. I'm cut and my kids will be cut, end of story. edit: Y'know for a bunch of guys, y'all are passive-aggressive cunts.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:41 AM
8

Why make a reasonable comparison if both targets in the statement are unreasonable?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:28 AM
–

This stuff is ridiculous. I'm a dude, I'm good with women, a decent human being and was raised by a single father. I have a very unique Men's Rights life story too, my father's divorce case was really interesting. I get the movement, I support it. These shoddily produced hyperbolic propaganda videos and e-books are sheer insanity though.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 11:43 PM
–

Not this thing again. Jesus can't you idiots be NORMAL for one moment. That e-book reads like Mein Kempf for frustrated beta-males who can't break their cycle.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 11:33 PM
1

I'm cut and I like my dick. :( Edit: changed the smiley for clarity. Edit 2: I'm still sad. :(
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:36 PM
0

This is fake guys, it's not from a circumcision. It's fucking 4chan. Urgh.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:31 PM
9

Girls like it when you're funny. ftfy
/r/seduction02/11/11 03:22 PM
-2

Granted I'm young but I've met girls who are genuinely self-motivated and want to make it on their own. Maybe these Sugardaddy/baby things are going to get a bit outdated as more and more pretty, smart girls try to get degrees and join the workforce?
/r/seduction01/11/11 09:50 PM
5

For sure, it's very liberating too. That's what friends, long-term partners and wives are for. A girl you just started dating probably has tons of her own baggage and won't feel secure with yours dumped on her too. It's a fact of life. Feel better.
/r/seduction27/08/11 06:15 PM
1

I do it all the time to people who seem obnoxious or too pathetic. Your game shouldn't be transparent to other guys, because that means girls can for sure tell what you're up to.
/r/seduction27/08/11 06:04 PM
2

You need to take a long hard look at yourself and your behaviours. There is no reason why anybody would leave you unless YOU did something to exasperate the situation. It's not a catch-22 at all - you just have to understand that no one will prop you up, you were probably too clingy, too emotional and didn't exhibit any sense of strength. Why wouldn't she leave you and your inability to deal with your problems like a rational man? You've only been dating for a couple of months anyway, she figure…
/r/seduction27/08/11 05:58 PM
5

Jesus, tell me you're kidding. Most guys, even on Seddit, would prefer a relationship that's fulfilling with someone they love (and loves them back) over random mechanical flings. The point of the quote is to say that one needs to put themselves out to sea, as in, to go outside your safe-zone (hanging out at the bar with a friend) and into unfamiliar, and potentially negative territory (approaching a stranger, making a move that risks rejection). I'd prefer to approach 50 girls, get rejected 49 …
/r/seduction02/08/11 07:10 AM
1

Yeah Montreal is pretty hipstery. Even the nicest clubs would let you in with skinny jeans and clean canvas shoes. It's pretty good, nice preppy-hipster guys look better than striped shirt idiots.
/r/seduction24/06/11 04:05 PM
1

I've read AoS, the historical aspect is fascinating but the fact he calls people "victims" is ridiculous and brings it down. edit: reworded OP, maybe now you guys can help me?
/r/seduction22/06/11 01:55 AM
1

I wish I could man; it doesn't really matter though. edit: reworded op
/r/seduction22/06/11 12:45 AM
1

OR you don't try to pick up at a dubstep concert. AND when people see/detect the desperate "I'm gonna hit on so many broads" vibe, they immediately shut you down. AND you're probably not very good at meeting new people [which is fine] but don't start with negging and all this mechanical PUA shit. Just talk to people, be friendly and work your way from there. Concerts are a terrible place to game, from my experience.
/r/seduction12/06/11 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter