TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Whiskeygiggles Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by Whiskeygiggles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA! Stop it! I'm dying here!
/r/RedPillParenting05/06/14 06:13 AM
4

Apparently you can't read. I said and think nothing of the kind. His wanting to kill all men does not twist into misogyny, I never said it did. The fact that he openly identified, many times, as a clear cut misogynist, does. The fact that he killed men does not erase the fact that he was openly a misogynist. Maybe you think Hitler wasn't homophobic because he also killed Jews?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 08:11 PM
2

That's expediency again, so he could control the women. He wanted to torture the women, not just get rid of them. He wanted them to suffer. Men were just in the way of that in his mind. He was also open to just killing off the women (slowly) and retaining a select few for breeding purposes with "men of intelligence" who would choose who the women were bred with. The women are seen, and referred to, as animals. The men are just competitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 08:05 PM
2

There's a difference between misanthropy (hating humanity because of humanity and it's inherent traits), misandry (hating men because of their gender), and misogyny (hating women because of their gender).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 08:02 PM
3

It is possible to hate men and women at the same time. One does not cancel out the other. Edit: I'm not sure why this is getting downvoted. It's a statement of fact. If you disagree you should be able to say why.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 12:20 PM
4

He didn't say a kind word about anyone, except maybe his mother. The difference is he literally said that all women should be starved to death in concentration camps and that women should not be able to choose who to sleep with. He does not say anything comparable about men. It's a huge distortion of the actual content of the manifesto to say that he "largely revered women" that is not true at all. As for the men he killed, he killed them out of expediency on his way to his 'war on women' (his w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 12:18 PM
7

Ok. I'm disappointed to see that you're still being defensive and you are projecting a ton of your general issues onto me. First things first: You suggested that you doubt that I have anything to do with suicide prevention, because I made a single comment to you in my entire life, and therefore could not have time to work in suicide prevention. Ergo, you accused me of lying. Secondly, I am not a part of any of these communities. I am not TRP, TBP, or the rainbow coloured glitter pill. I am not y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/13 10:58 AM
8

I really don't know what you're getting at here. Why so defensive? First of all, I live in Europe. It's late at night here, not the middle of the work day. Second of all, I said I work part-time in voluntary suicide prevention. That's my on the side volunteer job. I don't do it everyday. I am a musician and I work in media production, that's my full time job. I'm not at work now anyway. I'm glad that you take an interest in suicide prevention. It's a good thing to put time into. So, now that we'…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/13 03:36 AM
1

Are men who are victims of similar kinds of internet humiliation not also showing poor judgement? Also, what do you suggest in place of voting and democracy? That's a sincere comment. I'm genuinely interested to know what you think would work better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/13 03:24 AM
1

Men can be victims of internet humiliation too. Maybe no one should be allowed to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/13 03:11 AM
10

It wouldn't be for the sake of TBP. It's about being decent human beings and understanding that no one has the right to judge whether or not someone who committed suicide was "actually struggling". If they committed suicide then they clearly were really suffering, they were really struggling. They wouldn't have taken their lives if this were not true. It's abysmally ugly and arrogant to suggest otherwise. I say this as someone who works part-time in voluntary suicide prevention. I know something…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/13 03:05 AM
1

This is wasteful behaviour and not reflected as evolutionarily successful in any other species. Science doesn't support this notion, nor does common sense. You can choose to think this way if you wish, but don't try to say it is a scientific viewpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/13 11:48 PM
3

I agree completely. Not only does this make all kinds of sense in our real world, it also makes good basic evolutionary sense. Abandoning your offspring is not a good strategy for ensuring the long term survival of your genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/13 09:54 PM
6

That sums it up beautifully. On a wider, subtler, less illustrious scale, women are inhibited from all kinds of achievements, all across the world, particularly when it comes to STEM subjects. Women are conditioned from the get go, via toys (one example) to know that engineering or science are not 'for' them. I am a girl. I played with Lego as a kid, but only because my brother had Lego. It was never bought for me, even though I played with it more than he did. Similarly, I was not allowed, lite…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/13 03:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter