TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhitePeopleEatPork Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by WhitePeopleEatPork on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Men are Salesman I've had this suspicion as well. With women it's just marketing. They are not attracted to you, they are attracted to the idea of you. This is why an average white guy can get more girls than a handsome Indian guy. Because it's about her idea of the men and not them men themselves. A Woman's first thought of an Indian guy is pat pat pat pat, ding, ding, ding, ding. There is a whole series of turnoffs going though her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:49 AM
1

I'm gay and I say we are created to have the capacity to do that. And I am doing that, so you're argument doesn't hold much water Sxually mature teen girls have the capacity to take miles of dick, are you implying it means it's ok for them to have sex with 50 year old men?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:24 AM
1

Do you think god will change his mind in homosexuality someday? No I'm saying that we are created not to do that. Like if a male tiger has sex with another male tiger, the tiger isn't gonna go to hell. Because the rule is for humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:05 AM
2

So in reality that would mean you unconditionally oppose homosexuality, correct? No, it is contingent upon the prohibition.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:49 AM
1

Do you have any data that can back that claim up? Yes but they are somewhat anecdotal. Evidence 1: Pred catcher shows. They have endless content because pedophilia is very common. If it was rare they would have trouble making new episodes every day on youtube from dozens of channels. Evidence 2: Most guys will fall for an 17 year old with big tits and a fake ID. Evidence 3: Nobody criticized the marriage of Muhammad and Aisha until the past 100 years. This means it was seen as totally normal unt…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:45 AM
1

If his answer will always be to condemn homosexuality, logically there is no condition in which he will change his mind Yes that's right.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:34 AM
2

How do you feel about Saudi Arabia banning all marriages before 18? Firstly I would argue that this is only on paper to make western allies happy. In Islam the permission of the state is usually not necessary for a marriage. People will do it anyways. But if this is not just politics and they actually enforce it then this is how I feel about it: https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ Basically fucked if that's 100% for real. It's just hard to notice because it will be slow over generations. And the reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:30 AM
2

I mean most men are pedophiles, I don't understand what you are trying to argue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:14 AM
2

Does that mean you have conditions in which you'd support homosexuality? Yes. If God didn't prohibit that, then it would be ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:55 AM
2

Hate to break it to you but your guy is a child rapist Mary was 12 when she had Jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:53 AM
2

You have to have the age of majority to make any legal decisions for yourself without your parents. I meant if the legal system allowed full rights at puberty, but her husband can just make those decisions from her to answer your question. Do you think that it's a coincidence that most mass shooters are late teens or in high school? That's a white people thing. It is specific to you people. Most drunk driving occurs in the same age range. Most criminal records occur during that same time frame. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:52 AM
2

Buddy, pedophiles are scum. This isn't up for debate. Why don't you feel that way about homosexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:39 AM
1

Let's stick to the question: would you also marry your own sibling because historically that was a norm? No it's haram. Lets stick to the question: Why would I care about what two consenting grown ass adults do in their bedroom? So if there was a 17.9 year old girl and a 50 year old man, you are implying you would have no problem with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:38 AM
1

Lets stick to the question: Why would I care about what two consenting grown ass adults do in their bedroom? So if there was a 17.9 year old girl and a 50 year old man, you are implying you would have no problem with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:34 AM
2

Those are necessary parameters to function independently and to deal with the consequences of your actions. Yeah you basically already said that. I'm asking why you think so. Why are these parameters necessary?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:31 AM
–

What if you unconditionally oppose pedophilia? Then it is a belief since it isn't based on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:21 AM
2

Having sex with children is wrong in any place in the world, even Muslims are against it except for the ones secretly want to have sex with children Mohammed married a 6 year old girl and consummated the marriage when she was 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:18 AM
1

You can blame social conditioning for that Then it wouldn't be consistently opposed by various cultures. The uniformity shows that it is human nature to be disgusted by that. If it was social conditioning, it would be specific to a group of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:17 AM
2

Ok and what made you pick these parameters?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:14 AM
2

Emotional and behavioral independence and autonomy. The ability to care for themselves physically independently, legally without oversight, and the emotional capability and independence to make those decision while understanding the consequences. Ok so an adult is like 25-30?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:04 AM
–

Yeah, because humans suck. Yet there are plenty of examples of societies that oppose homosexuality. Why? Humans suck or you have been socially conditioned to think the opposite?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:02 AM
2

Poor girls who have to grow up in that. Most of the women I know that got married young are very wealthy. You got it backwards, it's usually the 30+ single moms that have to pay their own bills and stuff that are poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:59 AM
2

You are basically a white supremacist (even if you yourself aren't white) that expects people from other cultures to accept your way and your way only.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:56 AM
2

Ok I see where you are going with this: What is an adult? How do you define that? vs How do other societies define that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:51 AM
1

That's the entire point I'm trying to figure out the contradiction. People are giving conditions, then turning around and saying there are not conditions under-which it would be ok. What are your views on pedophilia? Pretty much swap that a view that a (western) society has on homosexuality and pedophilia. The way you think of pedos, that's how I think of homos, and the way I think of pedos is the way you think of homos.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:48 AM
–

So in your way of thinking, is there no way to oppose pedophilia? There is but it requires people to admit it is a belief and that certain cultures don't adhere to those beliefs. I would imagine they think the opposite, they think you are weird for allowing homosexuality and opposing pedos. What are the magic words one needs to say to prove to you that pedophilia is wrong without it being 'social conditioning'? It's logically impossible. If you have conditions, then what you are really say is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:46 AM
–

Why would I care about what two consenting grown ass adults do in their bedroom? So if there was a 17.9 year old girl and a 50 year old man, you are implying you would have no problem with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:36 AM
2

I'm religious so as long as you are married, God is ok with it. Therefore I am ok with it. In Islam we use biological markers to determine sexual maturity, not age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:34 AM
–

Nobody is condoning it. Oh really? Why do you think there are all these pred catcher shows? These youtube channels telling you "new episodes every day bro, subscribe" The reason they are able to do this is because it is common. They are everywhere. Why don't you go argue this in a court of law then. I'm sure you'll be able to overturn the age of consent with this powerful knowledge of history. I don't need to, society is being socially engineered by the ruling class to legalize it. Why do you th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:30 AM
–

No you didn't understand the discussion. They are saying there are no circumstances, meaning even if children had the maturity to consent, they would still oppose it. You are trying to give reasons and be intellectual, they are socially conditioned to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:19 AM
1

Buddy, I feel the same way about bestiality. Sure but what about homosexuality? Why don't you feel the same way about homosexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:13 AM
–

Children can't consent for a variety of reasons. So if they were, then you think it's ok? I'm trying to figure out where your position stems from. It's the elephant in the room that I am trying to point out: If you have an intellectual explanation, then so as long as the conditions are satisfied you are de-facto allowing pedophilia. If not, then you are socially conditioned to think this way. It's a belief of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:04 AM
–

I think pedophilia is wrong because children are not mentally mature enough to consent to sexual encounters. So if they were, then you think it's ok? I'm trying to figure out where your position stems from. This is not rocket science No but it's the elephant in the room that I am trying to point out: If you have an intellectual explanation, then so as long as the conditions are satisfied you are de-facto allowing pedophilia. If not, then you are socially conditioned to think this way. It's a bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 04:01 AM
–

We're saying it was wrong and is still wrong. And I'm asking why? If you have an intellectual reason, then it means you think pedophilia is ok under the circumstances that do not go against your parameters. If you believe it is wrong no matter what, then it is a believe. So if you could explain why you think it is wrong: Do you just believe it's wrong and parrot that view whenever the topic arises or do you have specific reasons as to why you think it is wrong? Which one is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:58 AM
-1

This is disgusting. Why don't you feel the same way about homosexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:54 AM
2

Your just talking in circles and rambling at this point. You are being disingenuous. You are giving reasons why it is wrong, then you are saying it is wrong no matter what. There was no point in giving reasons if it is wrong no matter what. Did you genuinely not realize that or are you being disingenuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:53 AM
–

People in comas cannot consent, There's no way children can consent It seems like you are just shifting the goalpost here but anyways: If we assume for the sake of argument that they are not in a coma and they had the ability to consent. Are you saying under those conditions you think it is ok to sleep with minors? Or is your opposition more of a believe of yours? I'm trying to figure out if you are socially conditioned to believe this or if it is an intellectual position of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:51 AM
–

children cannot consent. So if they could, then you are believe that sleeping with minors is morally ok? It seems like you are just listing a set of conditions. So this means as long as those conditions aren't an issue, you think it's fine. So you are basically a conditional pedo?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:41 AM
1

Never did I say it was okay under circumstances where those problems didn't exist. You should have just been honest from the start. Why argue with me and give all these conditions just to end up admitting that it is belief of yours and not something you derived from an intellectual basis? You believe that it is wrong to sleep with minors even if there weren't any problems. So it's not an intellectual position, it's a belief of yours. You are socially conditioned to believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:38 AM
–

It was a woman 1000 years ago and still is in many places on Earth. You are just socially conditioned to oppose pedophilia and embrace homosexuality. Your leaders have socially engineered you to switch these up. It is the opposite in more traditional parts of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:31 AM
3

Show me where I said there are reasons to have sex with a minor. You said: "I just gave your dumbass a gang of reasons why it's not okay." So basically you think it is ok to sleep with minors, as long as the problems you listed didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:26 AM
–

It was historically teen moms because life expectancy was way shorter than it currently is So you're saying it's ok to sleep with minors if "life expectancy was way shorter than it currently is"? So you're like a conditional pedo?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:19 AM
2

I just gave your dumbass a gang of reasons why it's not okay. You are contradicting yourself. You are saying there are reasons, then you are saying there aren't any circumstance at all, then you are again saying there are reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:17 AM
2

I don't think it's okay to sleep with minors under any circumstance wtf are you talking about. You should have just been honest from the start. Why argue with me and give all these conditions just to end up admitting that it is belief of yours and not something you derived from an intellectual basis? Anyways it brings us back to the start: I don't think it's okay to sleep with minors under any circumstance Don't you think you have been socially conditioned to think this? Why do you believe this?…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:12 AM
1

It's wrong because the children in these situations NEVER want it Ok so if: These people were living like they were 100 years ago There weren't any stories of girls trying to escape They wanted to get married Then you believe that it is ok to sleep with minors? I'm trying to understand what the conditions are. Is there anything else you would like to add?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:05 AM
–

If this was the morally correct way to do things why would young girls want to escape. Even 40 year old mature career women want to escape their husbands that they themselves chose. It's just female nature to believe the grass is greener on the other side. But lets get to the crux of the matter. What makes it not ok? I asked if it would be ok for group of people living like they did 100 years ago today. You then shifted from "I don't care what happened in the past" to "stories" (Which are most l…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:53 AM
–

in today's world What about in todays world in places that still live like they did 100+ years ago? Would you apply the same morals to those places or is it conditional? Not an adult, it is not right to have sex with kids as an adult. It isn't right or wrong. You are just not wealthy or handsome. If you are wealthy you can diddle kids on you private jet/island with politicians/actors/and other public figures. If you are handsome you'll never get reported because no girl is gonna complain that a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:36 AM
–

I don't care what they did in the past, they did a lot of messed up weird shit in the past that used to be acceptable but isn't now. But this was universal. It was human nature, "messed up shit" refers to specific cultural practices, not things that humans do across different cultures. They used to marry and impregnate children in the past, and your saying it's okay because it was always done that way in certain cultures? Same question: But don't you think you have been socially conditioned to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:23 AM
3

You cannot really have a submissive wife/gf and not view them as inferior to some degree I mean yeah we are superior. With a bit of training you can pick her up and throw her across the room, she will never be able to do that even with steroids. Men are also mentally stronger. If someone insults you, you likely wont give a shit. If someone insults her, she will cancel you, and call police, and make a twitter post. In my opinion women are too sensitive to be leaders.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:18 AM
–

But don't you think you have been socially conditioned to think this? Through out most of human history, it's been teen moms. It's only recently become uncommon and only in western or western influenced countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:11 AM
–

Even 83 year old Al Pacino just had a healthy child with a 29 year old woman. And Mary had Jesus when she was 12-14, so this whole idea of shunning older men with younger women but advocating for homosexuality, didn't exist until the past 100 years. So through out most of human history, it's been teen moms. It's only recently become uncommon and only in western or western influenced countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:08 AM
4

Yes. You are usually only shamed if the gender you slept with was male regardless of your own gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 01:41 AM
1

“Well he’s older snd has a cool car.” LMAO that's like the most stereotypical RP thing she could have said. As I was reading I though it was going to be more subtle and you would have to figure it out, but no, she just told you straight up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:15 AM
1

Because men actually have to work so we need a bit of bodyfat. A woman can perform her duties (cooking and cleaning) just fine without a much muscle mass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:01 AM
0

A 145 IQ woman would never date a date a man who has an IQ of 110 so it is irrelevant. Bro... They'll literally date homeless guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter