TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhoDoIThinkIAm Archive

View 1 post and 50 comments by WhoDoIThinkIAm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

WhoDoIThinkIAm/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I don't think that was the point of the WW screening. I thought it was more because Themyscira only had the Amazons on the island. The only man in Diana's life was her father and, no spoilers, I doubt she knows who he is since it's pretty difficult for her to reach him. It's just a gimmick; Alamo does that all the time. The one near me had male strippers perform for a Magic Mike showing and had "rowdy 50 Shades Darker" showings. I totally agree, it's a non-issue. I just want thought the reasonin…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:48 AM
0

lol
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 11:57 PM
-10

You have to be SRS to respect someone's gendering? Edit: wow... First time I've been in this sub thanks to r/all and I think I'll just not come back if that black and white viewpoint of the world is common here. I'm no fan of Brianna but at least it's content-based.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 05:21 PM
2

Frankly, I don't think it makes sense to publicize any criminal case until a judgment is made. But I tried to only state what was relevant to the current discussion.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:28 AM
1

True, but why should we make it easier for the strangers? Anonymity for both is the safest way to prevent public shaming of the innocent as well as maintain some dignity and safety for the victim.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:52 PM
1

I agree that it should either be anonymity for both or neither party. However, due to the likelihood of repeated victimization alone, I'd say it should be for both.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:48 PM
1

Because victims are statistically more likely to be raped again.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 05:48 PM
0

Yeah it's rude to shout at questions when you haven't been called on and sad that he'd ask about resolutions instead of a decent question.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:27 PM
3

The thought exercise worked around that. For example, even if the client admits guilt but charges can be dropped due to an unconstitutional search or illegally obtained confession, the obligation is to fight for the client, as even they deserve an attorney to fight for them. Sure, any lawyer can stipulate that they'll only work for people who aren't guilty but that's pretty limiting and unlikely to lead to any sort of career advancement or increase in clientele.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:57 PM
9

When I was in high school, I took prelaw courses. I was excited at the notion of being a defense attorney to help the little guy, the underdog. One day my teacher told us to imagine a client that walks into your office and says, "I raped and murdered a child." You're obligated to work on their behalf to earn the smallest punishment or none at all if possible. Then, my teacher said, "how will you live with yourself if you succeed? What if that client walks free and hurts someone else because of y…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:57 AM
7

So it feels true?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:19 PM
1

I watch it because I'm a fan of comedy; the comedians do great bits and the writers for the president are pretty good. For example, Stephen Colbert hosting one with Bush was flawless and Joel McHale was great this year, especially towards Chris Christie. Plus, I'm not prone to extremely violent sociopathic fantasies, such as wishing that a large group of people with lives and families including the innocent would die in a fire.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 05:47 PM
5

But he shouldn't make jokes which bear a pretty politically weighted message if he doesn't believe that message. He is the president, this speech was written for/with/by him, and every word in it is carefully selected. I suggest you never watch a White House correspondents dinner
/r/MensRights08/08/14 05:29 AM
1

You can't find an article conceding that women do this too? The same exact article: Of course the reality is that the same duplicitousness that Sally is being accused of is no different from behavior plenty of women have likely engaged in. When I interviewed Raoul Felder, the famed attorney known for representing celebrities and celebrity exes in divorce, custody and child support disputes for an article for The Root on child support laws, he admitted that he had had clients whose sole source of…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:06 PM
-2

"These" articles? I only see one linked article that was being discussed. In the OP, there was outrage mentioned on other sites and on twitter, but that's like saying someone on tumblr was offended or a YouTube comment is racist. I'm not saying other articles don't exist like you're describing, but if you're going to judge an article by a subheader or link title(likely chosen by an editor, not the author), you make us look bad.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:20 PM
4

From the article you didn't read: I’m not calling Lamar Sally half a man. But I am saying that Sherri Shepherd is at a certain professional and financial level and chose to marry someone who is not. That’s not to say other qualities do not matter in a relationship. Kindness, sincerity and true love certainly do. But the behavior alleged in their separation and divorce papers doesn’t indicate a relationship brimming in those qualities, either, which raises the million-dollar question: What, exact…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:55 AM
2

I've been subbed for a while now and I don't see a lot of what you're referring to. Any hateful comments are down voted to obscurity by the time I see the thread. I'm not aware of any death threats but I imagine they would be down voted and chastised too. In essence, r/mensrights is named as such because posts and ideas are meant to promote equality from men's perspectives. I'm sure r/feminism might be of a similar mindset. As for the discussion, I don't know of any times when this sub has delet…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:55 PM
2

I could believe that. I graduated with a degree in communications so I took a lot of marketing/PR courses and only one of those classes had more than 25% men in my time there
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:52 PM
6

You're saying that these people are taunting men by saying "your life is inherently easier" and the expected result is, "might as well kill myself since life's so good for me"?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:17 AM
5

I didn't insinuate you said anything. You asked for information suggesting the wage gap was a myth. I provided information explaining that the wage gap was mainly misnamed and when it was accurate, it was due to more reasoning than sexism.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:39 PM
3

Freakonomics.com/tag/wage-gaps/ Women are less likely to negotiate ending with unequal pay The q&a linked in the above: Women are likely to leave the workforce or reduce their roles for the sake of family. They choose lower paying specialties, take fewer finance courses, get lower GPA's, and work fewer hours. Common sense: If women are routinely paid less than men, less men would be hired for cost efficiency.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:56 PM
2

I had a similar first impression. I didn't consider all the additional variables you did, but I certainly am confused as to why unreported incomes were ignored for this.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:10 AM
2

Then why have it in the first place? And why are you so insistent on putting people down? First, someone's too young for your standards, then you insult people's character and now you minimize the importance of what other people have to say? Seems like you're the one that needs to grow up.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:08 PM
2

That's the second time you've used, "it seems like you're the kind of person who" and created an image of a person from an incredibly small amount of information to judge them by. You realize you're still using fallacies, right?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:26 AM
1

You're focusing on your "opponent's" age, not on anything relevant that was said, as if that number alone discounts everything that was said to you. You seem disproportionately angry to the situation at hand, which shows a lot in your final response to him. Look at it piece by piece: you're underageb& A)You've assumed he's in a country with a legal age over 17. B)You don't seem to know what b& means. In the context you're using it, I assume you saw it on 4chan and just went with it or you're tro…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:14 AM
1

I don't know if ad hominem attacks are the way to show your maturity.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:34 AM
1

I agree. That was my first response as well. Then, as the video wrapped up, I'd say that I was bothered more by how unfunny I found it than how offensive it was. As for the table turning, I don't think so. We've had reversals before, with "Shit guys/girls say," "Shit boy/girlfriends say," and things of that nature. If I remember correctly, the partnering videos were pretty popular and weren't considered sexist since both parties kept a sense of humor about it.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:30 AM
1

I don't think you can have an opinion of facts and you can't exactly ask an infant if they are in pain. I just don't see how cutting skin off an infant at all is supposed to be anything less than frightening and painful for a child.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:34 PM
5

How can you tell it's less damaging to children?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:50 AM
2

As long as the student isn't attempting to make the school environment chaotic or more difficult for anyone else to learn, that right to free speech still applies.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:54 PM
-1

This is entirely anecdotal, but when I was describing a problem between a couple of gay friends who had problems communicating in their relationship to my then-youth pastor, he told me that, "whenever a call is made to the police regarding a domestic dispute of a homosexual couple, they send an ambulance as well because chances are greater that someone will be critically hurt."(This summarized what he said, I can't remember the exact wording he used as this was at least 4 years ago.) I can see i…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:57 PM
1

If you see me, you can see that I'm at least in my late 20's(I'm 34). So for me to not have had a girlfriend would mean I'm just socially/sexually inept. I don't see the correlation. I've never had a long-term relationship and I'm 22. Each person I've been with has either wanted something purely physical without emotion, emotional without sex, or the timing didn't work out. Since our wants and needs don't match up, they didn't last. I don't see how that would make me inept socially or sexually.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:48 PM
1

To expand on that, in case anyone read that and worried that corn flakes will lower your sex drive, the ELI5 version is that in the 17th century, some people in the Adventist faith thought that since, "you are what you eat," and flavor could be a form and/or source of temptation, Dr. John Harvey Kellog created a diet consisting of no meat or flavor. After he discovered his corn flakes were so popular, he introduced his creation to a lot more people in a lot of grocery stores. If you were to eat …
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:15 PM
1

That's troll central and way too populated. Try the twitter path. Responses seem to be pouring in quickly. edit:changed "to" to "too"
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:49 AM
1

If you check the CNN Opinion twitter page, her account is listed in the same tweet as the article. I would post it, but the last thing the subreddit needs is someone posting personal information even if it's publicly available.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:32 AM
8

Or their twitter.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:23 PM
1

The women and men I've been with have luckily been into moderate biting and scratching. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. ninja edit: although certainly, this should not be tried without a discussion with your partner. I got lucky in that I acted in the heat of the moment and my partners responded in kind, but if any person had said "I don't like that" or "no" I would have stopped immediately, as any person should. edit: added, "in kind," as you may be suggesting that I like inflict…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:24 PM
1

I'm personally not a fan of the slap, but if you're suggesting that a consensual adult knowing what he or she wants sexually is unhealthy, that's not necessarily true. If you're saying that getting pleasure out of pain isn't healthy, you must not have tried. Biting and scratching can be awesome, and I'd wager that it's not necessarily uncommon.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:04 AM
2

That's quite a jump you're making without a lick of evidence suggesting that's actually my opinion.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:37 AM
0

Check my history. I'm a guy and I support men's rights. In fact, I've defended the subreddit against those that claim that every user is the same misogynist dick in major subreddits and /r/againstmensrights, but thanks for the broad assumption that anyone who disagrees with you on a topic relating to men's rights must be a woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:36 AM
0

So is it 'inflammatory' to say that the rape of women is underreported. No and I didn't say anything that would back that up. Relevant to what? The underreporting mentioned in the title wasn't even the main point of the article. If anything, the story should have been a bit longer, expanding to other countries besides the DRC to show that underreporting and male-victims of sexual abuse don't exist only in war torn countries.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:34 AM
2

Sexual violence is under-reported on every side. In fact, regardless of the method of obtaining crime statistics of any sort, your results will still be underreported. On top of that, I don't see what justifies a title that's so inflammatory. The article and life itself reflect that rape is possible from all points on the sex and sexuality spectrum. Not to mention that the supporting data was only 7 people and the article concluded with: Christian cited the need for more research into men's expe…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 09:24 PM
7

they know inside that they're broken people Big fucking deal, who isn't? They need constant public affirmations that their habits are healthy and normal, which even under basic psychology is pretty good proof that they're not. Non-homosexuals don't seek approval? It seems like someone didn't catch vocab like, "Maslow's hierarchy of needs" in their basic psychology course. In a way, it's a lot like goon behavior, they want to constantly prove they're smarter than everyone else Either you're horre…
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:20 PM
7

Stop making /mensrights look bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 09:19 AM
10

I think the general consensus is to be very careful when allowing strangers into your home.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 08:57 PM
2

/s
/r/MensRights03/09/10 04:59 PM
1

You could always ask them for info without visiting their site. I got the emails from their contact page: [email protected] [email protected]
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:49 PM
-2

maybe if you didn't hide a point behind a tremendous layer of condescending bullshit, people might understand you.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:43 PM
2

Probably because he has a penis.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 07:05 AM
1

I do not approve of such a lifestyle choice*. edit: *Looking British
/r/MensRights29/08/10 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter