TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Who_Decided Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Who_Decided on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The point is to balance the impacts, not erase all impacts. You can't flat leave someone and screw their whole life up after having entered an implicit agreement like that. That is the point of alimony.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:20 PM
1

That's an inaccurate analysis of the necessary premises. The conclusions are neither irrefutable nor supported by insurmountable evidence. You know very well that those are necessarily impossible conditions. Nor is that an appropriate approach. If you think piling evidence until it becomes insurmountable is the way things are done, boy does an old dead greek guy by the name of Agrippa have something to tell you. I am willing supporting a false conclusion; This, at the very least, was accurate. T…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:11 PM
1

I am somewhat confused. I could have sworn that I explicitly informed you that I don't do this dance anymore. Did you mistake my forecasting for engaging your arguments? Let's clarify this point finally. This conversation is concluded. Clear enough?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:57 PM
1

You can add infinite reinforcements beneath a false conclusion. It will never make it true. It is not unwillingness due to disagreement, though if you were using logic properly, you'd know that that would be a maximally reasonable approach. Rather, it is unwillingness due to ROI. Anyone who engages in these conversations often enough gets to know all of the probable permutations of this conversation, almost as an archetype you could say. They can estimate, with a high degree of certainty, that t…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:46 PM
2

Honestly, I'm not sure it's worth responding to you. I think I'll have a pretty good model for how you'll respond. For example, if I point out that most of the time that "I don't need you mansplaining how men have problems too" is delivered in the context of someone bringing up their problems as a redirect of a conversation unbidden, with the full expectation of the conversation now focusing on them, you'll attempt to counter by asking what space men are supposed to have to express themselves th…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:25 PM
2

Plausible deniability is certainly a red flag. I'll answer your questions, but I treat this conversation as having concluded already. Nothing offends me about MRAs. They are evidence of a problem that spans several disciplines and areas of life.I think they should end for hte same reason I think we should outlaw smoking cigarettes, because it exacerbates existing problems and creates new ones. Stop trying to moralize what is mechanical. What I find contemptuous is the streak of toxic masculinity…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:31 PM
2

Feminism does not have the male agenda at heart. That's a massive benefit. Right now, all over the world, fraternities of pseudomen rule the world. Men who never had fathers or never had fathers who were whole and healthy men themselves banding together to raise themselves like lord of the goddamn flies and you expect a cohesive and non-toxic set of values or goals to arise from that? No, we, as a group, are unfit for leadership at the moment, and if you cannot lead then you must follow. The def…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:42 PM
1

Career resets tend to have lifelong impacts, CEOs excluded.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:46 AM
2

I'm not active in any feminist subs. i don't frequent this sub. You showed up on r/rising. What did you expect?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:30 AM
1

because working age women today couldn't be expected to return to the workforce. I've worked at the same company, along the same career path for the better part of a decade, but that hasn't always been true. i've had large, largely inexplicable, gaps in my employment history before. That is like poison to anyplace worth working at. Even having lived to know the truth of that, I personally would still look at a long gap in employment history on anyone's resume and it would be difficult for me to …
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:19 AM
1

No. I wasn't offering a counter-point, by intention. You seemed like a person who needs to be spoon fed points bit by bit or else you’d be lost and I didn’t want to lose your attention before I was finished. Is that the impression I left you with? Or rather, is that the conclusion you reached from the available data? Might have gone better if you went statement by statement towards a logical conclusion. For example, in the sentence "In order for you to understand this you need to accept that fem…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:56 AM
-3

This is my first time hearing about their organization. I don't see anything overtly anti-male or even implicitly aggressive on their website. Is there something I'm missing here about them? In any event, being anti-male is fundamentally anti-feminist. That's why groups that are anti-male within the larger feminist heading are pushed to the fringes. Same goes for feminists that exclude trans people (TERFs).
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:26 PM
3

Radicalized Feminists are the truest form of the enemy and they are pushing their “harmless” agenda further and further into the mainstream feminist propaganda machine. I've come across women on the internet that are so hardcore rad fem that they won't have a relationship unless it's with another woman who only has relationships with women and who gladly advocate the extermination of all men. Seriously out there stuff. With that said, from my observations, on whole feminism tends to trend away f…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:24 PM
-3

Were you writing me a poem? Sup with the spacing?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:21 PM
1

The problem is big enough to ignore the name. Beyond that, almost all of the research done on the subject falls on that heading, so it's not only the name of a movement, but does double duty as a keyword for anyone seeking to be further informed. Also, despite the name, the male viewpoint is represented in feminism. Now, if you're suggesting that it's not often discussed or isn't often placed at the center of the discussion, then that would be why we need more men advocating for men within a fem…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:35 PM
8

The problem isn't what people in spaces like this do what they do. It's why. Trying to make an adjustment to society over a comparatively minor injustice through consistent discourse (which also serve as community-building opportunities and sanity checks) is distinct from dealing with your unique and personal trauma and insecurity by projecting your problems onto an entire group of other people and spending your time spewing vitriol about them online. Plus, as a man who both appreciates the poin…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter