TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Whoooah Archive

View 0 posts and 441 comments by Whoooah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm a BDSM sub, it's second nature :) It also sort of insults me that I work hard for Master to call me a whore, and these people do nothing but be a) female b) assholes c) both.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 12:04 PM
12

Get help, you're fucking batshit.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:20 AM
6

Yes. I'm equally annoyed when women/mothers are called whores in a non-BDSM context.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:10 AM
4

Lol, no. She's a woman, and one helluva woman at that.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 01:32 AM
0

Maybe if you had such diversity in your ridiculously huge group (ie; cultish and "in group") of moderators, you'd actually have a worthwhile conversation and debate for once, instead of the circlejerk you have.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:14 AM
1

I very much like your post on this. I mean, of course, in this particular situation, the dude is totally right (except I resent the phrase "rug-muncher" being used as an insult). And the image itself is great - amusing, informative, and a bit of deja vu if you've encountered this situation. But it's not always like that. Some of thr people I argue with are very intelligent. Some of the people I argue with have some valid points amongst the things I argue. But by default, it's best to enter a sit…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:12 AM
0

Assumption and hypocrisy. Nice.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:35 AM
-1

Being a dumb asshole is not better than being "a dumb asshole". Nor is it better than being an arrogant and petulant turd like you are being.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:13 AM
0

I don't care, you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:19 AM
0

So the people who openly expressed wanting something matter less than the people who didn't express any opinion at all until AFTER the chance they were given? Makes sense, if you're mentally handicapped.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:41 AM
6

You're a disgusting piece of shit. Die, troll.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:12 AM
1

I'm pretty sure it's just a turn-around on the fact that some people/groups/cultures blame the victim. I'd be downright lying if I said nobody blames the victim of crime for the crime when it comes to rape. It happens sometimes, and it sucks. Anyone who believes that people actually need to be told this is an idiot. Rape is a crime, and I think this is just pointing out that you shouldn't blame the victim for going about their business and having a crime committed against them any more than you'…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:12 AM
0

If nobody wanted a symbol at all, nobody would have voted at all.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 01:05 AM
1

It was vote-based.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:18 AM
1

Fuck off and be "cool" elsewhere. We're already on "on the fringe of society", and fuck everything about degrading or excluding anyone for popularity.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:18 AM
0

I don't really consider marriage a right Stopped reading here. All couples should have the exact same standards - if a man and a woman can marry, then a man and man/woman and woman should be able to. Love is love. And being gay does not discount your love. Nor does it mean that if you follow a religious path, that you're lesser a person than anyone else who does.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:16 AM
0

Hey, how's it going? I've started joining multiple feminist organisations under the names of r/amr trolls, and r/amr regular members. What's good for the gander is good for the goose, right? A lot of them seem to be hate-condemning your posts, but that's okay. It's all on you. not me. Especially since my username is purely for Reddit. It seems that "actual" feminists hate Reddit feminists. Who'd have thought?! Okay, I admit, it was me - though, I'm not the one who agreed with me over and over. H…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 11:35 AM
0

A thousand times yes. What kind of inhuman yeti would consider thingsarebad as anything more than a troll or a moron?
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:29 AM
1

You. Marry me. I've said it a thousand times - nobody is 100% responsible for their partner's orgasm. As far as I'm concerned, my man is a part of it, but FFS... I'm not going to torture him by putting all responsibillity on him. Nor will I put all responsibility of his one me (unless we're having fun with our frequent BDSM play). He's a partner to my orgasm, and we both have to work for both. He can help me, I can help him. But I don't expect him to just go "ping - you're cumming". I can fuckin…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:02 AM
1

Damn right it's not. I think this is actually the first time in all my time here that I've encountered something so blatantly idiotic.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 05:31 AM
0

Fuck it, that's twice in this thread. What the actual fuck is this "gay agenda" you people mention? Seriously. Enlighten me.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:56 AM
-1

That made me lose my shit as well...
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:55 AM
1

Saved, for the next time anyone accuses r/mensrights of encouraging/inciting violence.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:41 AM
0

I take offense to your implication of arrogance, because it was in fact YOU, not I, who just now implied that anyone needed reminding. I don't think it's pre-emtively ousting anyone - again, those are your words and expressions of an alleged agenda, not mine. You're inserting an awful lot of agendas and opinions into my simple and rather neutral statement. I don't know if you're projecting on me, or if you're just looking for something to disagree with, but I think it absurd. I feel that the rem…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:40 AM
1

Gay men? Bisexual men? Transmen? All men. All deserving of equal rights. Yet somewhat overlooked here. It's good that we have even a small symbol to remind everyone.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:54 AM
2

Redditor for nine months, zero comment karma, only a single post. Calling shenanigans.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:53 AM
3

And how does a person get good at fucking if nobody will give them practice?
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:51 AM
6

Pray tell, how would it not be good? The reason the logo is changed is in support LGBT month. Gay men? Bisexual men? Transmen? All men. All deserving of equal rights. It's good that we have even a small symbol to remind everyone.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:49 AM
9

Girls don't usually grow beards. Should I maybe get one? Nah, you'd still be full of shit even if I did.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:39 AM
0

Cheers. Also, I just upvoted your previous comment to counter the WTF downvote.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:35 AM
1

Sorry. It just seemed very convoluted and nonsensical. Also, a sore point for me.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:33 AM
13

The sky is green. Everybody knows it. ^ See how that's not a valid argument strategy?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:04 AM
2

Not according to your deleted posts.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:17 AM
2

Fuck you, frankaka.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:09 AM
3

But the other MRAs might rape me because patriarchy! /s In all seriousness, it's a nice idea, though not without concerns.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:01 AM
5

So anally raping a woman is not rape either, right? Because fuck you so much I hope you die.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:58 AM
1

Another thread on it.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:42 AM
2

Some transpersons remain non-op, or are yet to have the surgeries they desire (pre-op). And of those, some will reject their penis, whilst others embrace it (even if only temporarily, in the case of pre-op). Today you learned. :)
/r/MensRights02/10/11 05:20 AM
2

How so? She seems relatively comfortable with her penis and gender identity, a doctor suggested potential circumcision-related causes, and she suffers numbness and actual pain "Since [she] can remember".
/r/MensRights02/10/11 03:17 AM
2

There's a little bandwagon of them that ride around various radical feminism based subreddits, modding them all, and them claiming equality and non-bias. When their own ranks dissent (see; a lot of r/metanarchism) and state they disagree, the other few dozen mods come in and downvote nonmod user dissent, then upvote the disliked opinions expressed by mod users. It's hideously beautiful. Like a rabid weasel mauling a baby rabbit.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 08:36 AM
2

More to the point, why are there almost more mods than regular posters? Hah.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 08:30 AM
0

You know that one better than anyone, Tits.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 07:53 AM
1

The prophecy has been fulfilled. Mercy be given us.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 07:52 AM
0

I think there should be a law that absolves the biological father of parenthood entirely - no parenting, financial, legal responsibilities. Possibly with a nameless "fact sheet" of medical history, for the child's sake in future. Forcing an abortion on a woman is something I will never consider okay; t is an invasive, slightly risky procedure. Nor forced sterility - few male rapists are castrated, if any (I have no citations of if it happens at all).
/r/MensRights01/10/11 07:32 AM
0

Cool thing for you to learn, other than how to read - the little * next to my post time means it's not a ninja edit. Again, I was exceedingly clear. Telling me I wasn't won't make it so. I understood you, based on what you said. You didn't understand me, based on your not understanding that the same standards apply to men and women. telling you you're wrong is not insulting you. And your insistence that there's a downvote brigade, when there so far is not, only makes you look sillier and more bi…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:09 PM
0

Bit rich. You're wrong, just accept it and move on. I can't even fathom how you could interpret the legal definition of sexual assault and/or rape as different for a man, unless you're sexist in some way. Since nobody has actually downvoted you, you're petty and premeditatively defensive by calling it a "downvote brigade". Unless that's what you think r/MR is. Edit; I just returned all your downvotes. Petty of you to call me petty, whilst you act pettily and petulantly.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:02 PM
1

Go ahead and be wrong on two different subreddits. I don't care. It's not a downvote brigade, it's showing sexist people for what they are. If it had been a man talking about a woman, it wouldn't have taken you so long to get it. I was very clear about what I meant. You were shockingly wrong with how you wanted to interpret it.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:01 PM
6

Personally, I put on eyeliner first. Then eyeshadow powder. THEN, a dab applicator of eyeshadow the same colour as the eyesliner in the area, to re-darken and blend the colours a bit less sharply. Lastly, mascara. I don't really wear a LOT of makeup. I wear and almost neutral pinkish tone, to highlight my lids, a white and shiny powder from there up, and black eyeliner/eyeliner eyeshadow/mascara. It essentially just accentuates my eyes. I can't offer anything more neutral or more dramatic, as it…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:46 PM
1

Girlwriteswhat is an MRA and regular poster here.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 03:42 PM
1

So something you can't prove proves something?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:02 PM
2

You really have no concept. So much so, that you can't even take the time to try to.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:42 PM
1

Votes say otherwise, most of the time, I'm afraid. Which is what lends a little weight to my agreeing with you now.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:41 PM
1

Bow-chicka-bow-wow :)
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:03 PM
1

These jokes are decades old, and still unfunny.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:45 PM
9

Heya :) Girlwriteswhat is a really awesome r/MR user - I'll confess, I may or may not have feigned asking her (I presume!) to gay-marry me, heh, due to admiration and agreement. However, I truly do not see a real need for that additional subreddit. The only real problem with this current subreddit is the r/AMR harpies - and moving from our waters is only letting the harpies win. However, the other sub is a nice idea, so thanks for posting for any MRAs interested.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:35 PM
10

It's kinda cute that you think being unbanned means we give a shit.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:29 PM
1

Oh-ho, citing an anti-MRA thing is to lend you credibility here? Haha, noooo.... stopped reading.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:28 PM
5

Nooooooo.........! ......oh, good. You jest. -_-' /relief
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:26 PM
1

Fuck... pay attention to this. Thingsarebad and I disagree on pretty much everything, and if not, somehow find a way to. But I agree with him on this, so much so that I am posting that I do. Srs bsnss. Lots of it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:33 PM
4

Modern medicine would like a word with your bullshittery.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:09 PM
-1

Actually, yes, being pro-woman's rights DOES equal feminism Just so you know, I stopped reading here, because lies are not my thing. Fuck you, twice, for trying to label me.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:20 PM
3

Cherry-picked literacy, how does that work? You should know better than anyone, you mod AMR.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:33 AM
1

Thanks for replying and clarifying what you meant :) I am affected by my birth control (Implanon) - but it's mostly emotional (gained a few kgs, too), I'm still horny as a jackrabbit. Of course I understand that some HBCs can affect sex drive, but I've always been told by medical professionals as well as just people in general that it means you're probably on the "wrong" one (wrong in quotes because if it's stopping babies, it's mostly right ;)). In fact, with my emotional side effects, I myself…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:35 AM
-1

How fucking dare you attempt to use her parenting style and love for her child to force a point down her throat. No, fuck you and anyone who looks like you. Being pro- womens rights does NOT automatically equal feminism, you ignorant shit. I am pro- womens rights, but not a feminist. I'm pro- mens rights, yet not anti- womens rights. I'm an egalitarian, if you must put a label on it - though my vagina does not make the pro- womens rights part of that "feminist".
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:25 AM
2

Getting a sex change to become a man would increase your odds in women-dominated fields? Son, you're high.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:58 AM
1

Sex drive is a person-to-person thing. I have a naturally high sex drive, some people don't - some people are even asexual. Not a problem, unless you're with a vastly mismatched partner.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:55 AM
1

Yeah, I want sex erryday. On hormonal birth control, it's reduced to less than six times a day. Sex drive is a person-to-person thing. I have a naturally high sex drive, some people don't.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:51 AM
1

This is just awesome all round. Great job, guys.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:16 PM
1

Scumbag CoonTown; accuses people of bigoted actions under a bigoted username.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:39 AM
1

We don't really have Jewish people in my country, so that point is falling on deaf ears, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:38 AM
1

You were socialised as a boy for the first part of your life, if I'm not very much mistaken. You aren't in much of a position to comment on how young women are socialised. You're not from my country, either, unless I'm double very much mistaken.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:54 AM
-4

Hi, I'm a woman. My mother tried to teach my sisters to do this, even though it didn't work for her (my mother) for decades. All three of my sisters are the sweetest, most independent, kindest young women you could possibly imagine, due to being taught to treat each and every human being as a human being, not as their gender. Not misogynistic to point out that a large portion of today's society is socialised wrongly and sexist-ly. Shove it up your arse if you think otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 03:07 PM
9

lolwut
/r/MensRights18/09/11 01:26 PM
3

I see you're still a bigot, despite enough medical evidence thrown in your face to cast at least a shadow of doubt to your bigotry's credibility. I'd like to introduce you to "hermaphrodite" intersex persons the world over who prove you utterly wrong on your "penis = male" simplistic and bigoted view.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 01:30 PM
2

Homophobic slurs are something I hope is not generally welcomed here.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 01:27 PM
6

Fuck that person.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 09:20 AM
1

There are more options than just circumcision to treat phimosis, yes, but they don't all work all the time and some people don't want to try them. This is a grown man who made a choice for himself, which is the whole reason I oppose infant/child circumcision - an infant/child can't choose, an adult can. Good for him, hope it works out.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 02:51 AM
1

I personally think she deserves more, but I'm glad the heinous bigot got punished at all. Good news.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 02:45 AM
6

The chromosomal thing is mostly a facet of intersexuality. Intersex, in humans and other animals, is the presence of intermediate or atypical combinations of physical features that usually distinguish female from male. This is usually understood to be congenital, involving chromosomal, morphologic, genital and/or gonadal anomalies, such as diversion from typical XX-female or XY-male presentations, e.g., sex reversal (XY-female, XX-male), genital ambiguity, or sex developmental differences Though…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:22 PM
6

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20032-transsexual-differences-caught-on-brain-scan.html http://aebrain.blogspot.com/p/reference-works-on-transsexual-and.html The second link is just a list of useful links. Chromosomal factors are already well known - XX can occur in males, XY in females, as well as XXY XXX etc...
/r/MensRights16/09/11 12:36 PM
8

You obviously have little understanding of medicine, which actually does often back up the "women born in the wrong body" phenomenon with chromosomal and neurological (female brain in male body) indicators. As such, it is pointless for me to argue with your either unaware or blatantly bigoted ass.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 11:15 AM
1

Holy shit, I didn't even see that when I picked the gif. It's usually Bart. WTF, minecraft creeper? :/ (actually, a minecraft creeper is a good analogy of how I felt seeing LC's name up there, hah)
/r/MensRights16/09/11 06:15 AM
2

Rape culture doesn't fucking exist, as that link so well articulates for me. Improper handling of genuine cases does.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:44 AM
2

Twisting of the legal system? My not going to the police due to the fact that I was violated and torn with an object other than a body part, thus leaving no viable evidence, is twisting of the legal system? The Police Commissioner ruling "mishandling of a victim" in my friend's case based on forensic evidence and the recorded interview is twisting the legal system? My mother's several psychiatric commitments and lifelong eating disorder from PTSD due to a case that was completely solid except fo…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:15 AM
5

My favourite image to sum it up, is The Genderbread Man.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:46 AM
3

Actually, it's because it's dangerous to use anesthetic on babies, and the creams are insufficient to curb the pain. Fucking assholes. "Oh, the painkillers and numbers are dangerous and ineffective. Lets do it anyway LOL". >:(
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:31 AM
18

Goddamnit. I hate that (assuming this is not a troll, but regardless) a younger woman can have a level enough head to question her wrongdoing, there will always be some asshat in the wings to convince her that what's good for the goose is apparently not good for the gander and she did no wrong.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 11:23 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:36 PM
6

She simply hates any and all things that have ever or will ever have anything to do with maleness. Even women who were most unfortunately born with the wrong body, which happened to be male. She's using one small truth - some transpersons have surgery to help alleviate their condition - to lend credibility to her ignorant and bigoted horseshit. She's selling turds sprayed with perfume.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:33 PM
1

It's not my analogy. I cut out the last line - "fuck the patriarchy". Reactions were a lot different than if I'd not done so. Also, I was savagely sexually assaulted, more than once, and was mocked and disbelieved. more than once. I was also the support person at another person's rape interview, recorded, and they were harassed by the police in a perpetrators interview - we're still taking legal action on that now. My mother's case was thrown out, because she'd had sex with one of the men who ga…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:22 PM
3

Yeah, it seemed almost a reasonable concept for a fresh start until I saw her username. I was going to post on there to her pro-MRA, anti-feminist blog that I posted here, but she removed it (closed the blog).
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:08 PM
4

Trying to drag a pig out of it's shit hole only gets you covered in shit and a pissed off pig. Gay marry me. But seriously, possibly the single best analogy I've ever heard for it.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:48 AM
5

Those things are mostly /b/. It is the asshole of the internet, after all.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:12 AM
4

It's an imageboard. It's just what they do.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:12 AM
2

*Yotsuba B or Burichan (on /b/)
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:10 AM
4

I love you too, man. Just because false rape accusations happen doesn't mean real rapes don't happen. It's hardly retarded to talk about the issue of the real rape of people.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:05 AM
2

She needs psychiatric attention. My cousin had a similarly bad (worse, actually...) life, and she has severe psychiatric problems and needs to be hospitalised from time to time to keep functioning - for her safety, and that of those around her. Otherwise, she's probably going to go around continuing to fuck shit up. Edited, to correct grammatical errors I made early this morning
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:18 AM
0

A sleeping person cannot consent to hand down their pants, ergo, sexual assault. And you did not elaborate.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:51 PM
0

Oh, I'd love to hear how sexually assaulting an unconscious person is excusable. Do elaborate.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:59 PM
1

You don't have to believe her. But it's enough to cast shadow of a doubt to guilt. Also, in the case of the entwife, if she woke up and some person had their hands down her pants, that's sexual assault at least, regardless of the circumstances of the sex the night before. Even if consensual, consent once is not consent forever, and putting your hands down the pants of a sleeping person is inexcusable.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 06:25 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/kc2ry/hey_twox_i_am_the_girl_who_was_lynched_for_lying/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kcd24/remember_that_girl_who_does_zombie_makeup_who/
/r/MensRights14/09/11 06:05 AM
-2

It looks like OP made an inflammatory and unfounded (doesn't have enough evidence to come to a conclusion) remarks and is now trying to get an upvote brigade in. Nope. The ents are especially laidback and kindly, and so do not tolerate such inflammatory things on the ent subreddits. Apparently some people didn't learn anything from the recent fiasco regarding the zombie makeup girl (something I'm glad I stayed on the fence about).
/r/MensRights13/09/11 11:57 PM
1

Worry not, I entirely agree. I took it that you were weirded out by the (admittedly, farfetched) concept entirely. It was a random thing to toss in there, but not a don't-do-that-it's-mad concept. basic health and safety of people who do not already have it, and cures for aggressive and fatal diseases/conditions definitely comes first.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 08:13 AM
1

Did I ever mention no, you're an idiot?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 07:57 AM
2

It would be odd, but not an evil idea. Gay male couples may particularly like that option - if it ever happened, was safe, and elective (like IVF, for example). Seems like an extremely farfetched idea, but I suppose so was the idea of a heart transplant once upon a time. We won't, if ever, see it for a VERY long time.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:34 PM
1

Of course, in any house with more than one person there needs to be concessions from everyone involved, and sometimes one party may be more pushy, or naturally dominant in the relationship for whatever reasons.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:33 PM
1

PTSD and trauma. War veterans ducking and rolling from car exhaust backfire, etc..
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:06 PM
3

Of course you would! The good news is that if she doesn't disclose to you, then she obviously needs nothing from you vis-a-vis support for her transgenderism. The entire premise of this discussion is "not disclosing due to fear, and never having to", and if she were afraid of me, I personally feel that there would be some kind of issue that would need either addressing, or proper management and support. Nobody should be afraid of the person they love rejecting them for who they are. Disclosure i…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:02 PM
1

Butthurt. :)
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:39 PM
3

Haha, you banned me from your shitty, insignificant subreddit because I pointed out you have no reading comprehension. A post that was made on a different subreddit. Butthurt. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:21 PM
3

So if it was ommitted that you were bed-wetting until age 6 Bedwetting doesn't affect the kind of support a person needs decades later, or their personality and emotional needs or sensitivities. If I were a man, who was with a post-op woman, I'd want to know what is required of me to meet her needs. I'm being told that I am required to disclose something that puts me in danger, that is a cause of great distress to me, and that is no-one's business! No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying I th…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:46 AM
4

No it doesn't. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:32 AM
1

I keep a landing strip, so I'll be growing a wider one for Movember. Maybe I'll try an interesting shape, like a vag-handlebar (curled up at the ends, if possible)r. Vag-mo's for the win.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:27 AM
3

Your theory is shitty and sexist to everyone. Read I'm OK, You're OK Process ???? KNOWLEDGE!!!
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:18 AM
1

Your wording is a bit off here. "convince women's husbands to **allow* them to watch it*"
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:10 AM
-1

Because you keep advertising here - not only advertising, but slandering the r/MR mods and userbase in order to do it, you fucking idiot. It clearly states that's the reason.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:01 AM
0

You do not believe in fear, manipulation and mental incapacitation? This conversation is over, then. You invalidated my experience which was not as crazy or hard to believe as his. Read "When Rabbit Howls" by Truddi Chase - it's the most chilling and horrifying glimpse into what abuse can do to a young mind. I, personally, believe he could have benefited from psychological assistance. But that is here nor there when I comes down to it.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 10:33 AM
2

Nor I. In fact, if you subtract the raping part, and switch the sides of feminists and MRAs (eg. "train them to become feminists"), it sounds a lot like some of the crazy extreme radical feminist shit I've heard before.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:47 AM
1

Manipulation and emotional trauma can do a lot of damage to children, or anyone, and make them act in unexplainable ways. I was obedient as a puppy to the person who sexually assaulted me, partially out of fear (especially of someone else finding out, or getting into trouble), and partially because the power balance had been established, and I was undeniably lower on that chain than his doormat - only a horrifically traumatic and physically damaging occasion snapped me out of it (possibly surviv…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:42 AM
2

Because they're so self-righteous that they'd probably have posted an invasion thread to themselves for dissenting with themselves, haha.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:17 AM
2

I know. I've read it. You have no proof, regardless. Have you ever been a 12 year old girl? I have, and not too long ago, either. His story was far-fetched, but plausible - like Fritzl's sick fuckery. Maybe it's because my 13 year old foster sister sexually abused a (unrelated to her or me) foster brother on multiple occasions using her mother's sleeping pills, maybe it's my insight into how capable 12 year old girls can be, or maybe it's my having been disbelieved about being sexually assaulted…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:07 AM
8

I like how r/amr crossposted to this titling it "r/MR has a moment of clarity", and they're oblivious to the utter hypocrisy of that, as well as the self-insulting nature of doing so.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:29 AM
3

I love the lack of censorship here. However I really wish you were banned to the bowels of hell.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:09 AM
5

Ignorance is not a crime. Attacking people harms your cause. Educating them furthers it. Why do you want to damage your own cause? I don't understand you at all. Kloo tried, he didn't get it right all the time, but he tried. Nobody tried to teach him any different, only attacked him for not figuring it out himself.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:02 AM
4

So your partner having a medical condition is akin to taking money from you? Really?! You get that annoyed with your partners for having non-communicable medical conditions since birth? No, the upset over omission would be the same. Like in the link I posted, even if you don't care the tiniest bit about what was omitted, the fact that it WAS omitted can completely destroy any and all trust. I would want to know about any medical conditions or infertility so I could support them, help them, and i…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:57 AM
3

Kloo left some time ago, now. You have no evidence for or against that claim, so your argument is invalid. You're just attempting a smear campaign. Which is a shame, because Kloo was was trans-supportive.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:37 AM
5

First of all, what issues, and second of all, issues for whom? Issues for the transperson. Someone is more likely to be violent, and more violent, over being lied to and ina relationship/bedded under, in their eyes, false pretenses, than a person who knew beforehand would over simply being told. As a mild analogy; if someone took money from me, then admitted it later, I'd be far more angry about that than I would have been if they told me they needed money and gave me the choice of giving it to …
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:31 AM
3

I can see your point, but waiting until after can cause serious issues that are far worse than disclosing beforehand. Giving someone the choice to go through with something with the whole truth at their disposal before the decision is far less likely to result in a dangerous situation than telling them after. Some people would react more violently to being deceived into doing something they may not otherwise have done, than someone reacting violently to being given the choice. And beyond the phy…
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:44 PM
1

Not lonely, big family and the love of my life sustain me. Not a virgin. Can't "jerk it", have no penis. Ew, hentai. Don't speak to my mother. Ew, "hotpockets". Learn to spell. It's Scheiße. Also, ew. P-R-O-J-E-C-T-I-O-N
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:37 PM
1

Implying that non-troll feminists never do that.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 01:54 PM
2

In TwoX, they post links to topics here about a disgusting post, and all the people over there pat themselves on the back, saying "Yeah, I knew those /r/mensrights people were sexist jerks" Just so you know, 2X has a strict no crossposting policy. The above statement is not correct. The rest is, however.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:26 AM
3

2X is not a feminist subreddit. Radical feminism is often told to fuck off, there.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 09:30 AM
7

If it's true, it's terrible and I feel sorry for her because nobody deserves that. If it's fake, it's disgusting and I feel repulsed that a person could cheapen the trauma of actual victims, and soil a (albeit, fictional - but it colours people's opinions others nonetheless) man's name.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 05:58 AM
1

WHATTHEFUCKWHATTHEFUCKWHATTHEFUCK?! Holy fucking shitting christ. I hope she never sees that kid again. EVER.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:30 PM
1

Anally? I don't want to imagine. /shudders
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:28 PM
3

Why do you keep on discrediting yourself by throwing "bitches" into every second post? Also, what the fuck is "up/downmodding"?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:26 PM
1

This is shit.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:21 PM
3

Ooh, I got a crosspost to r/amr as being an invasion thread. This is like my third cub scout badge! Ban (for a post I did not make there), crosspost to a comment of mine, now crosspost to a thread of mine. Awesome.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:59 AM
1

I'm not this time.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:25 AM
0

Shitty "guesstimate", mate.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:56 AM
0

I have proof you didn't know. Condescending? Maybe. Presumptuous? No. You admitted yourself that you didn't understand what was said. You, however, assumed i didn't know certain things without any proof or even reason to do so.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:51 AM
0

I did. You just didn't get it until I dumbed it down.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:44 AM
2

You destroy your own credibility. I never said "personally" anything. No, I don't destroy my own credibility. And you didn't need to say anything "personally". Including "bitch" (after the above post, repeatedly) was obviously your personal opinion which decreased credibility of your otherwise fine point. I specified that you, specifically, are a jackass, and not your point or persons who agree with it. The rest of your comment has nothing to do with what I said at all. You're being intentionall…
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:11 AM
3

You post about men being labeled creeps just for saying hi, then go on to give another reason you personally could/would be labeled a creep or some other negative, thus decreasing personal credibility of your point - which is actually a fairly reasonable point, aside from your self-dismissal. And, Indog is also correct about while it's a valid point, there's no need to be inflammatory and contradictory in our examples of it.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:57 AM
4

men who are labeled creeps for saying hi ... to a bitch Well, I think we can see where your problem lies, at least. Not completely disagreeing with you. Just pointing out a big credibility destroyer.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 01:42 AM
-1

There is pretty much no doubt. Both are into gender rights. Both go by Lady_Catherine. Both have the same name and profession. Both have the same general interests. Both have a slaveboy "zeta male" husband. Both are going to get their kid Cthulhu something-or-other. Both "Hail the Aesir and Vanir".
/r/MensRights08/09/11 10:07 PM
0

Indeed it is. Holy shit WTF. It makes me wonder if this is the person her slaveboy husband thought he was defending here. The site I found this on also had no feminist-related anything, but several anti-misandry things.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 09:12 PM
1

Troll thread.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 08:01 AM
1

First thing that jumped out at me was the assertions that; a) MRAs are on par with fascists, and to a lesser extent - trolls. b) MRAS, fascists, and trolls are only men c) only men love bacon, and bacon means a person hates animals d) anarchism is no longer about anarchy I'm a female MRA, poultry breeder (for the simple enjoyment of having them roaming around our huge block - we don't eat them) and dog owner, and goddamnit I love bacon. So at least half of the above is demonstrably false. I'm pr…
/r/MensRights08/09/11 05:36 AM
1

Oh, the "look, it's a troll" line. Diversion of accusation troll.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 05:15 AM
2

So would Fritzl's story. And that happened. Jussayin'.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 05:14 AM
1

Redditor for 0 days -24 comment karma ....and posts consisting purely of stereotypically antifemale insults that are generally not seen here. You are most definitely not an r/amr-based defamation troll. Not at all.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:55 AM
1

I have no opinion either way on the picture of the woman with a sign. There is not enough information. Though it sounds like her point is that he didn't realise what he did was was (possibly) rape - as an extreme example, some parts of africa, a woman just can't say no in their cultures, so it's "not rape" - but hers a diluted version, "he felt entitled to it because X, Y, Z". I'm not sure how valid that is, especially in western societies - it's heavily emphasised that rape is wrong. A bad pers…
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:28 AM
3

I don't like it either, but to be fair it does clearly state that it's kloo's belief.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:24 PM
2

Oh yes, the majority are statistically men - so far as I know. I just enjoy my inherent reason for disproving manhating trolls, heh :)
/r/MensRights29/08/11 04:57 PM
11

Lol, fucking morons assume that r/mr subscribers are men, and also that they can't "get any". I'm a woman, and I specifically request some questionable kinds of sex. Thanks for oppressing me, you sexist, heinous shit! :)
/r/MensRights29/08/11 04:22 PM
1

Your unfounded generalisation is invalid.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 04:25 AM
1

I'm so hurt. Wah. I'm sure absolutely nobody could possibly see my history and deduce that you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 02:09 AM
2

Ah, sexist rhetoric in answer to logic. It sustains me, because I get a reminder to positively reflect MRA values and represent Mens Rights respectably and with logical argument, as opposed to... well, the fiasco that is you.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 02:04 AM
3

Ah, of course. The person with years of training and experience isn't the dumb one (even then, I think mistakes just happen, and fuck it they're not dumb for it). The person who took the doctor's advice is. Of course. We don't even know the doctor's gender, and yet again, you're extrapolating sexist to both genders bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 02:02 AM
2

I was right about her Here's what you said; I'd suggest you do it more often. Or maybe he should only go to work one day each year? Seems fair. Hmm, that's a strong implication that he supports her, and it's her job to make him a "romantic" meal every night. I do work, but I don't have a monday through friday schedule like he does. I just so happened to have that day off. Oh, she does work, and simply took some of her free time to do something nice for them both. How nasty and feminist of her to…
/r/MensRights29/08/11 01:57 AM
3

It's also highly likely the doctor made a mistake, and now it's being sensationalised. Also, your downvotes sustain me.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 01:49 AM
2

Yes, and I'd go to someone with years and years of training and experience in diagnosing that problem, and probably listen to their account. Like... oh, a doctor. You know what else causes stopped periods, besides multiple illnesses? Stress. Overexertion (like that of boot camp). Hormonal imbalances. My period has stopped previously due to all of the above (though the overexertion was not from boot camp). She may have been misdiagnosed, not just had a pregnancy undetected. In fact, I've bled alm…
/r/MensRights29/08/11 01:13 AM
2

It's a doctor's job to diagnose a pregnancy when presented with symptoms of a pregnancy. A woman cannot take responsibility for being pregnant if the person in charge of verifying it did not do so. I don't know how else to explain it.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 12:56 AM
2

Mens bodies produce 50% of the material required for conception. See, I can state facts that don't support or disprove my point as well! Bolding doesn't make it support your argument. And if your periods stop? Do you not seek a second opinion? Not if you're in the army and have some of the best doctors in the country at your disposal, one of whom told you you're not pregnant (and possibly even gave some other reason for menstruation ceasing). Not when it's so terribly easy for doctors to accurat…
/r/MensRights29/08/11 12:00 AM
2

Men impregnate women, other women do not. It is a doctor's responsibility to do their fucking job and detect it. Although I don't expect you, probably not a medical professional, to understand that, because you will say and do anything to deny that somebody didn't fulfill their responsibility to diagnose. And on a serious note, this has nothing to do with me, and it's a bit sexist to make it about me. I have no responsibility for a doctor not properly diagnosing a patient, and I'm fully responsi…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 11:42 PM
3

Ah, so that lady who posted a picture of the lovely meal she prepared her man deserved to be accused of mooching and insulted, with no proof of ANYTHING - only a picture of the nice meal. Of course. The vast majority of your comments are intentionally inflammatory and have little evidence to them. 2X is actually not feminist-oriented at all - most radical feminism shit gets downvoted to the bowels of hell and told to fuck off back to r/feminisms. You simply have a few feminists who post there - …
/r/MensRights28/08/11 10:23 PM
3

OneYers are manginas and women, Alienating 1Yers. You also love trolling 2X. Is it just 2X and 1Y you hate enough to troll? Edit; ooh, you edited your post to make my quote look disingenuous. Didn't work.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 10:05 PM
3

Nope, but men and women interested in things regarding men very well could be. You're doing a great job of alienating them before they're given a chance. No high five.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 09:49 PM
5

Oooh, sexism. Ouch. Not. We should keep men out of the military too! Impregnating women and all. See how stupid you sound? It's a fault in a medical professional. Have you ever tried the Australian (female) Military?
/r/MensRights28/08/11 03:08 PM
8

Dont give me this two-to-tango bullshit. I was under the impression that sperm AND egg was necessary to breed - my bad? My body, My choice, remember? so its women's responsibility to get pregnant or not. If her assigned doctor was unable to tell her she was pregnant, even with descriptions of symptoms, it's hardly a deception on her part. More of a career-destroyer. As soon as men get a choice to abort babies, or not, then two-to-tango is a valid argument No, not being diagnosed as pregnant in a…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 03:00 PM
7

She told her doctors her symptoms well in advance, and they did not diagnose correctly. Doctors > home tests. Sometimes, especially if she was a trainee, she couldn't seek a second opinion. Also, you think it was not a man who got her knocked up? two to tango and all that. Again, source; potential female (edit:) Aus Armed forces recruit.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 02:44 PM
11

Being an Australian woman who researched joining the Australian Army, I can point out that you are completely wrong. In training, often, trainees do not have the freedom to come and go as they please. Trainees and privates are often given a GP. Why doubt an army doctor? Add to that, the fact that doctors diagnoses of pregnancy are meant to be a LOT more accurate than a pee-strip test, and the fact that she presented symptoms for months AND told her doctor - it may not be 100% the doc's fault, bu…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 01:01 PM
17

Uh.... the doctors - people responsible for detecting pregnancy in pregnant women - failed to detect a pregnancy for several months despite pregnancy symptoms. I actually do think she has a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 12:08 PM
4

What. The. Fuck. Know what she needs? Over a year away with full commitment. I was content just to watch Mr Whoooah read the news, and wait to get randy, after over a year of waiting and thousands of dollars spent on trip. This.... threats of mutilation for not watching some probably not-ground-breaking movie is a load of scary shit. Edit; oooh, some misogyny aimed at me for taking a.... non-misandric viewpoint. Way to live up to your name, /r/WTF.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:01 AM
4

Mmm... alienation.... it really helps further the cause. Wait. No it fucking doesn't.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 06:45 AM
3

I like to think /r/MensRights is more about discussing the disadvantages of men, the hypocrisies of radical feminism, and what can be done in regards to equalising genders specifically focusing on the rights of men. Not revenge fantasy copypasta from the most dubious part of 4chan.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 02:02 AM
2

"Before you write me off as a gold digger, let me tell you about all the monetary things I gained through shamelessly whoring myself". That how I read it. I didn't go further than the first paragraph under the first photo. I rarely do with shitrag women's tabloids, though.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 01:49 AM
3

Fuck witholding sex. Especially since I'm forcibly denied by distance right now. Pretty much every emotion on the scale makes me ragingly horny - happy, sad, angry (especially this one), anticipation, that "horror movie scared", bored, asleep (...I'm into some fucked up shit). Pretty much everything except very sick or worried/anxious. I've already made the promise to the Mr to never withhold sex. At worst, postpone it or offer an alternative - a rare bout of not feeling up for it? Try again in …
/r/MensRights27/08/11 02:29 PM
68

Personally, I mostly believe this.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 02:06 PM
2

I know you're trolling, but birth control does fail.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 04:15 AM
5

My goodness! You mean I can do whatever I want to people and blame it on something that is both a flimsy premise in modern western society and irrelevant to the fact that I should be held accountable for my shitty behaviour? You, (presumed) ma'am, have done me a great service! We should both use our vaginas as excuses from now on. Girl powah! ;)
/r/MensRights27/08/11 03:28 AM
4

Getting kicked in the cunt and having your clit smashed into your pelvis feels an awful lot like what I imagine having the head of your penis hit with a hammer feels like, and hurts for DAYS. Jussayin'. The rest, I'm digging.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 02:41 AM
1

Asbestos is fucking well non-combustible and used to be used for fireproofing. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:18 AM
3

The scenario is a pretty funny date fail, regardless of genders, if you have a sense of humour. Otherwise, it's just sad. You troll 2X and constantly no matter what they say. This is no different.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:12 AM
12

Holy shit. The guy getting fucking keyed in the face in the open street made me cry angry tears. I can't even imagine bringing myself to do that. What the actual fuck goes through these women's heads?
/r/MensRights26/08/11 11:45 PM
13

redditor for 12 days -873 comment karma Yes, you are most definitely not a troll. Not at all.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 11:40 PM
1

I would think so, yes. I simply intended to try be understanding of the issue, because regardless of how much I disagree with someone or feel negatively about them, I'm not going to compromise my personal standards of sensitivity or my beliefs regarding gender - at the very least, because it could invalidate/hurt people I don't have any "beef" with. I don't actually know Aerik's circumstances for certain, I based my post off vague recollections - based off the same vague recollection, Aerik is s…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 08:10 AM
1

Link fixed. Sorry, but I don't argue half-assed. Upboat for not hiding a slip-of-the-mind.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:08 AM
1

The moment you make a decent argument about how the poor child or the parents didn't consent to being a poster-child to this cause, I realized you had a good case. Alright, that's fair enough. Feel free to delete your response, and I'll remove your name, if you like (though I'd like to leave the link up so I don't look like a raving lunatic).
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:04 AM
0

Thanks for the downvote. Have two. I haven't downvoted you, but I can start if you like. My response actually boils down to "If they're honest with you from the beginning and give you a chance to make a choice in accordance with your views, you needn't be an asshole to them if they were not an asshole to you". Your aggression does not validate you. If someone is disrespecting you just by being trans and giving you the choice whether or not to accept that about them, and you see that as a reason …
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:59 AM
1

It's not that you've got facts wrong, or that it's "not nice" to do this, it's that that child died and now you're using them. That kid wasn't able to consent to this - being a literal poster-child for a cause - while it was alive, let alone now. And, unlike many living children used as poster-children, the kids parent's probably wouldn't consent to this either, it'd actually probably be very hurtful. It's a bit of a low-shot shock tactic. Edit; Link to removed image.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:35 AM
2

Whoring an actual dead child (hypothetical is different) to further a cause repulses me, no matter how good the cause.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:10 AM
1

See; Aerik (well, up until recently - I believe there was a recent-ish announcement of a gender-identity shift).
/r/MensRights25/08/11 02:54 AM
2

So you're allowed to disrespect their definition, but they aren't allowed to disrespect yours? As long as a person is honest about their circumstances, I don't see why you couldn't just suck it up and respect their definition, because being honest about it gives you the chance to politely decline - thus respecting yours.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 01:01 AM
8

"This turd smells bad." "Find a better turd."
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:51 PM
5

I do believe the issue they have is the disrespect for transwomen by calling them "dudes". If they saw themselves as dudes, they wouldn't make the transition to women, after all. The guy has a preference for ciswomen - fine. But he needn't have been insulting, disrespectful and cruel by calling transwomen "dudes". There are kinder and more humane ways to express a lack of interest.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 08:41 AM
4

factual inconsistency Story of OP's life.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:31 PM
-1

Upboat for humorous reference, haha.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:29 PM
3

I made an edit and your reply came before I posted. This seems to not raise eyebrows - as I said - because women are seen as less "shallow" and more diverse in taste, which is sexist towards men, who are assumed to enjoy only the stereotypically "attractive" woman.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:04 PM
4

Male celebrities are assumed to have a list - the stereotypical "desirable"/"hot" girls. It's actually sexist to men and their variations in taste as it is to women and the variations of beauty, because women are far sooner acknowledged as having differing and "unusual" tastes whilst men are expected to go for a stereotype. eg. any slightly-famous guy getting married garners attention when it's a a "hot" woman, any slightly-famous woman getting married to anybody garners loads of attention. Nobo…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:00 PM
1

Age minimum was her own age, and probably said sex-starved because she likes sex a lot.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:55 PM
5

So you'll bang just any person, yes? Dunno if the article is fr srs or a joke, but standards are okay... for example, if someone lived at home, required you to leave your home country, dyed their hair pink (and you disliked that), reeked of something you didn't like/were allergic to, was younger than you (and that wasn't your thing - Sinead herself is 44) and didn't want to fuck you, it'd be pretty okay if you weren't interested. I'm not sure this belongs here.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:30 PM
1

Urgh, I'm so sorry you (edit: I mean your whole family, I'm not sure if you were alive then, heh) had to deal with that. I'm incredibly glad that your grandpa won. It's really hard being confronted by family members doing this, isn't it? Luckily, my aunt was only drumming up support before trying to do anything, and we all bitch-blocked her because it wasn't a surprise - she'd always been pretty heinous (...molested my dad and one of his sisters [and that's just that I know of] when they were ki…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:33 AM
1

You think she should be punished because someone abused her colleagues. Did she abuse them? No. So that would be punishing her for a crime she did not commit. If you feel she should be punished for a crime she did not commit, why is it different if you are? Nobody should have been abused, and both genders of offenders should have been treated the same - ideally, not abused. Wishing retrospective abuse on a person is just sadistic and petty.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:20 AM
0

Why on Earth should I have to join her? I have not committed any crimes. Because you want her punished for not being punished - she couldn't control that. Equally and fairly does not mean punishing someone for something they didn't do. She DID do the same thing as the men, and it was wrong that they were punished and she was not - both genders should have received the same treatment. But wishing harm on someone because someone else didn't harm them is just puerile and sadistic.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:11 AM
1

Why the fuck ask a question under the guise of simple curiosity if you were just going to pick an argument out of the tiniest details in the response? You don't have to agree, but you don't have to be an asshole to someone who took the time to answer. Have some class.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:06 AM
1

Seriously, what is the point of coming into a thread in which a particular demographic has been asked a question and attacking their answer? You may not like it or agree with it, but unless you're in their position as well, you're being a bit trollish - all they did was answer a question, not make an argument. Have some class. There's a time and place.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 08:50 AM
3

TLDW. I'm gonna lock in "Too damn young", Dave, for $100,000.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:52 AM
4

How's the weather in Bizzaro world?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 04:51 AM
1

Maybe it wasn't political, but a poorly-used blanket term - as I explained.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:50 AM
1

Thanks for making a non-troll contribution.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:27 AM
3

Thing is, we're not pussies. Your wife is for not being able to handle words on a screen - even with a little personal army of modbuddies to silence even the people who she claims to represent when they disagree. A couple of cowards. How quaint. I feel sorry for you. Suddenly I realise Mr Whoooah is actually pretty lucky.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:20 AM
3

Saying that you're being blunt when you use ableist and homophobic slurs is actually linguistically a cementing of your ableism and homphobia - if you wanted to backpedal properly, you could have claimed satire or offense-for-effect. The fact that you need all these sockpuppets speaks volumes. You yourself don't see your point as valid enough or something to be proud enough of to attach even a singular anonymous screen-name to. I don't know what you think we should be worried about. You are a co…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:14 AM
3

You might be interested to know that spin_kloo_spin, reviled troll of /r/mensrights, is also a kangaroo. They have the rather interesting delusion that /r/mensrights gives a shit about what they say. They are also able to post the same thing over and over, and induce yawns over the "single fuck not given" They also, on at least one occasion, believed that we hadn't already heard this before.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:12 AM
0

I agree, I really didn't think much of it because most people just know what murdoch-block is and the general idea behind it. Perhaps shitlisted would be a better term in future.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:43 AM
1

It's easier to use the new term "Murdoch-block" loosely than explain each tabloid rag I block and why. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:36 AM
6

I know it is not uncommon. My father's sister did it to her husband, who had helped raise more than half my generation - I have literally dozens of first and second cousins he helped raise and was always there for. Hilariously, my family disowned my aunt and kept her husband because she was a piece of shit :) I agree on the mother who cried wolf part - that's tied as most infuriating thing. I'd elaborate on my rage, but since you brought it up I know you already know, heh. Edit; I should add tha…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 11:48 PM
8

I do not like the Daily Mail - I generally use Murdoch-block, but I unblocked this to get the gist of it. What a sick and heinous piece of shit. I am abso-fucking-lutely disgusted that she would engage her child in that - she doesn't deserve to parent at all. Kudos to the judge.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 10:50 PM
2

This is why I'm glad nobody takes the Greens seriously. Fuck that. My mother is the most abusive, psychopathic bitch on the face of the earth with the most abusive alcoholic boyfriend who she loves to choose over her kids. It took me years of that before I was a legal adult and could tell everyone to shove it, and my dad and I are are still struggling to protect the other kids and be able to see them all regularly. I'm the eldest of 6.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 10:36 PM
2

China definitely does not have such a good track record so far as accurate representations go. I guess I just really want to believe this one, heh.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:30 PM
7

Tomorrow's pay says some uber-feminists jump all over this citing "oppression". Disagree with a lot of China's governing, but this time - high-five China!
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:39 PM
2

Yeah, I haven't been so clever about ignoring them so far. Think that this post, on top of one of the nutters calling in her husband (allegedly) to fight her battles and having them chicken out too just hours later, is the final nail in the coffin of me giving a flying fuck.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:10 PM
-1

Yes, you did know. You carried out a whole argument previously on the context of my being female. And if you agreed that the issue should be addressed (and not the non-guilty [of sexism] beneficiary of the sexism punished), why would you argue so hard with a point you're now claiming to agree with. I know that's what this sub is about. It's why I post here.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:34 AM
0

No, I think that the fact she was given preferential treatment in the first place should be addressed. Punishing her after-the-fact for something she didn't control does absolutely nothing. I'm out on this one. I know you're a regular troll here, with a special fondness for me because I'm a girl. I just liked the chance to further elaborate my point.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:19 AM
4

It was her husband, I believe.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:05 AM
0

Indeed, I agree. However, bombing in with "this chick should have suffered because the guys did", especially when she had nothing to do with causing their suffering, does not fit either bill.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:00 AM
0

I want men in the west to receive the same privileges women do, and for women who have lesser rights than men (such as many African and Middle Eastern countries) to gain equality in their lives as well, which is why I phrased that post that way. I do not think in terms of just western societies. Bring all the lesser points up.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:47 AM
1

Maybe you should read all my posts on r/mensrights. Edit; or even some of my 2X posts.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:01 AM
3

http://i.imgur.com/DZI8O.png Just so OP's shame can live on. Not so "cold and unforgiving" now, are you?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:59 AM
1

I read my own posts before I post them. ie. I'm a 2X.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:56 AM
3

Then you should have to join her. Gender rights are about bringing everyone up to the same level, not taking everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:02 AM
2

I doubt you understand gender well. Because it's incredibly easy to tell sex or gender via small blocks of text. /s
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:50 AM
5

Herd of hydras and all the heads are tangled.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:47 AM
2

Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. Yay, irrelevant quotes!
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:33 AM
4

"God" isn't exactly for women's rights. Rape your wife, sell your daughter, stone your sister etc.. The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 04:30 AM
10

Things that gets me is that half of these are in parenting subreddits. It distresses me knowing that these people can be reached out to - they're right there in front of us! - have information put in front of them and hear stories from men who went through the same thing, and they just brickwall it with ignorance.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:35 AM
11

You seem more egotistical than anything else.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:28 AM
1

its not a relationship if you are not having sex. What is this I don't even. Also, he denied having it when SHE found out she had it. That doesn't prove she couldn't possibly have had it already.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:13 PM
3

Okay, I just snorted cola into my sinuses with the force of my sudden laughter.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:51 AM
1

your's Oh, come on. I can sorta understand using the wrong your/you're, frustrating as it is to read, but "your's" isn't even a word.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:48 AM
3

Again, I agree. I'm guess I'm frustrated at ending up being judged to be like that asshat - he's like a piece of shit stuck to men's right's shoe, and all so many people notice is the stink from that.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 07:04 AM
1

I'm just gonna point out that there was likely little interest because you initially forgot the link, and even after it was edited in, self posts on political/rights issues attract less attention. Not ragging on you, just explaining some possibilities.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:46 AM
1

It doesn't definitively say he was diagnosed before they had sex, though. It's making a lot of assumptions about the nature of their relationship - did they have non-committed sex before being in a monogamous relationship? When exactly is the start of their relationship - when they made a monogamous commitment, or when they decided to be together? Were they 100% monogamous? People have threesomes, people cheat, people are sometimes in open or semi-open relationships. Does she actually have any p…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:31 AM
1

If you actually read the article, it's about more and more women choosing not to work, or to work part-time - myself, I'm currently out of work. But wouldn't I love to be able to work and make a little cash, yet keep some of the free-time for my own development and interests! And really, it IS none of your business if I want to bake biscuits or go mountain biking. There are other good examples to be set for children than simply to work their ass off until they die in the name of money and power.…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:57 AM
3

I agree with that. I just feel if there is going to be a confrontation of sorts, it should be to try to teach and challenge, not vitriolic drivel with absolutely no argument merit like the above knob.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:16 AM
1

My bad, it was really late and I must have brain-farted. *HSV
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:13 AM
1

Sexual health consultant Dr Colm O’Mahony said, “Being sent to prison for passing on herpes simplex is like being sent down for 10 years for a parking offence. I’m appalled. There is no way of proving who gave herpes to whom If he did knowingly give it to her, he deserves a punishment. I'm just trying to give a bit of a "benefit of the doubt", because I don't know everything. I mean, to be fair, they cited the Daily Mail which is a gossip rag at best. And a lot of it is he-said/she-said.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:10 AM
1

That's precisely what I said. Point?
/r/MensRights20/08/11 06:02 PM
1

if you are fat, and are able to burn 3000 calories in a day, why the fuck would you then eat 4500 calories, you deserve to made doubly made fun of in that case. Because you're (not YOU, mean a hypothetical person) a greedy, fat dumbass - that's why. I'm not saying it's a regular occurrence, Just that it IS possible, when you previously said it was not. Personally, I'm a 1500 or less a day person.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:39 PM
5

You're such a hypocritical troll. :)
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:34 PM
9

It's cute that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Look at my history, jackass. I constantly argue "Mu". I regularly post neutral-to-agreeable things here, and at every opportunity I caustically argue against circumcision - let alone even more severe genital mutilations. You're trying to win favour by "calling out feminists". Sorry, hun - I'm an MRA, through and through, and you're only succeeding in highlighting your own sexism because I'm a female MRA who does not identify as fe…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:29 PM
4

So... burning 3000 calories a day (reasonably more than the average person uses or needs) whilst eating 4500 calories per days is impossible? No.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:24 PM
6

I'm a woman who fucks the everliving shit out of a man. I've no interest in some random internet person whom I actually dislike and constantly argue with. I'm just not an asshole who would rather extrapolate insults instead of applying logic. You're a disgrace and stain on MRAs if you keep up that attitude. Shit, son. I've been posting mostly agreeable stuff here as long as your account has existed.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:21 PM
4

Technically, you can be active as all fuck. If calorie input > calorie output, you get/stay fat. I'm not picking sides here (okay, I disagree with MuForceShoelace... on a regular basis), I'm just not for illogical extrapolations. Merit of argument > petty insults.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:12 PM
14

I have to say, while I'm constantly bitching out MuForceShoelace for things I think are stupid and sexist - personally derogatory remarks aren't really serving much purpose or furthering any cause. Pop-psychology and unfounded judgements based on appearance and not merit of argument are actually a a bit of a wank, really. Actually logically arguing a point would carry everyone leagues further. You're only enforcing negative stereotypes against MRAs and misrepresenting a good portion of us.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:02 PM
1

This completely answers my question.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:40 PM
1

Which Australia do you live in? Oops, Austrialia, not Australia.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:17 PM
4

I'm a girl, not a boy. Don't call me "bro", you sexist dickhead.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:01 PM
1

I can't believe you don't realise that taking pictures of my kids is stealing their souls. Irrelevant bur interesting fact; a lot of Australian Aboriginal traditions state that photos are in fact stealing part of or all of the soul. So some shows here display a warning that they contain images of deceased persons to avoid unintentionally inflicting anguish on those who knew them. /derp
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:07 PM
3

I for one could give a fuck what gender anyone is, especially on the internet. Male, female, cis, trans, bigender. Does not fucking matter. Lets be equals It's a nice shade, isn't it?
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:02 AM
2

Fuck everything about this.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:18 AM
3

Am I going to be the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with the concept? I mean, it's a permanent infection, and if a woman knowingly gave a man a permanent disease I'd like to see her jailed too. He was jailed for knowingly infecting her~ (theoretically, it is not proven) - there are some studies that link genital HPV to increased risk of cervical cancer, and prostate cancer in men. Not quite on the same level as HIV/AIDS, but this isn't something you can just take a course of antibiotics…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:05 AM
1

I love how the thread itself has 18 downvotes. With 20+ mods, I'd bet a stab at my ass that it was solely them who downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 03:20 AM
6

No. Never. Fuck off, you heinous asshole.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:27 AM
1

Yes, I would most certainly like to participate in your subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:43 AM
1

That's not exactly relevant. When I mention one of my younger siblings, I don't automatically mention the other four as well - doesn't mean I think of them as "lesser", or love them any less.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:57 AM
2

Are you fucking serious? You've been summoned to be an objective juror, and you're here asking for opinions on something nobody here knows anything about? For fucks sake, you're breaking the law.... over Reddit... if you listen to anything here,
/r/MensRights18/08/11 02:17 PM
1

Hey, man. You're leagues ahead of plenty of people by just admitting it could have been executed better. Much respect for that :)
/r/MensRights18/08/11 01:14 PM
3

You should not be trying to interfere with a fair trial like this. This is grounds for a mistrial, and is a black spot on your character. I personally feel you're whoring yourself out with this thread, and find it deplorable. You're quite a bit of a sneaky asshole for putting people's LIVES on such an unbalanced scale. I love r/MR, but you will not get an unbiased view here - and even if you did, it's still grounds for a mistrial. Troll. Asshole. Never existed. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:10 PM
11

I didn't even get all the way through the article yet, but I think reducing a person to child status ("men, not boys") within moments of meeting is unfair and a method of reduction. Just like I'd hate some guy calling me "little girl", as a grown woman. Ie. Being cruel and egotistical within moments of "hello" is not "totally joking around". You should read "I'm OK, You're OK", it's old - but the simplified system of "The Parent", "The Adult", and "The Child" statuses of interaction are very int…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 11:59 AM
2

Simply posting something there would have been quicker and less scrutiny-attracting. Jussayin.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:33 AM
2

Says the guy whose account is younger than my activity on this subreddit. Says the aggressive, presumptuous, misguided (?) jackass. Yeah. Your judgement means nothing to me. You're already worse at representing men's rights than I could ever be - attacking within "your own ranks" with no evidence or provocation. I'm calling troll, now. Ciao.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:26 AM
2

That's still no evidence again me. In fact, I've been posting on r/MR since before your account existed. Kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:12 AM
14

Mother takes little girl to event to make her little girl happy, is angered when her little girl is made happy by different things to her mother My brain is full of fuck. (ie. agree).
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:02 AM
2

Ah. a) you're a troll, or automatically opposed to any opinion from a female b) your reading skills are not good enough to read my comment history c) you're misguided My money is on c.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:01 AM
1

Foundations for that accusation?
/r/MensRights18/08/11 09:33 AM
0

seriously replies to sarcastic comment Whooosh.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 08:04 AM
1

beta males :|
/r/MensRights18/08/11 07:41 AM
2

You'd be surprised to find they often do. Several times a week, I'd go so far as to say. /browses both daily
/r/MensRights18/08/11 06:53 AM
1

My bad. Was up late and comprehension had fallen to shit. Thanks for being cool enough to clarify. It is clear to me that we need two government records. One should list all the details of birth, while the other is used to verify parental authority and obligations. Variations from the traditional family can only advance if we decide what it is that truly makes someone a parent. I completely agree. Not just for reasons such as this case, but genetic medical history. There have even been a couple …
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:56 AM
2

Music is war? -puts down the saxophone-
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:13 PM
1

Re: My post; Sorry, but are you arguing with me or agreeing with me? :|
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:06 PM
1

You're welcome. I've only been with one man, but in all the porn I've watched anything circumcised gets instantly closed because... well, I'm not going to insult people.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 03:26 PM
1

Don't thank me. Male circumcision is rare in my country these days, so opposition so something my whole country already considers pretty damn wrong isn't something to commend. I appreciate the sentiment, though :)
/r/MensRights17/08/11 03:25 PM
10

In the 9th century BC, according the legendary history of Britain, Queen Gwendolen gathered an army and fought her ex-husband, Locrinus, in a civil war for the throne of Britain. She defeated him and became the monarch. Shit, that Gwen didn't need to be given a chance. She snatched it. Also, Cleopatra, Boudica, Queen Elizabeth I, Maggie Thatcher. Those examples, along with yours... well, your claim of "Never given a chance" is pretty untrue. And most of histories wars were in times looong ago, w…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 02:22 PM
1

I really feel for the guy, truly. But after all, it was a private ad he answered, he didn't go to a sperm bank Well... that wasn't very wise. He may not have legally been absolved of rights and responsibilities due to sperm donor laws, but as the judge said "he did not have a contractual right to remain on the certificate", either. He offered to give someone else a shot at a family, and presuming he would be a part of that family is a bit of an oversight on his part, regardless of the relationsh…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 01:57 PM
6

As a woman, I'm more shocked that she doesn't know anything about her own genitals. Dirt in labia is what causes yeast infections? Holy shit, WTF. The rest. Well, I've been very vocal about my opposition to circumcision before. OP, how the heck can you be friends with someone so stupid? I hope this is just some acquaintance or something. Massive props to you for maintaining civility in the face of extreme frustration and explaining to her. I'd like to direct you to this page, which I post a lot …
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:08 AM
1

Cheers.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:10 PM
2

Never said it did. I said you're judging an entire demographic on one small group discussion board. It's like saying 2X represents ALL women. I'm antsy because this thread has not been transphobic, but was still used as a foot in the door to accuse.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:16 PM
6

I think all officers are in danger, but female officers are probably (can't say definitely, don't have evidence) more at risk physiologically. That said, I have personal experience wherein assault of a female officer is treated as far more serious than assault of a male officer and I don't think that's fair either. Police safety in general is an issue that seriously needs to be dealt with, for both genders.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:01 PM
6

Derogatory language is not necessary and decreases your credibility. Also, the rest of your post does a bit too, to be honest.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 12:56 PM
1

Great. You have evidence that those particular people are insensitive. You're making a messy argument. As someone who held a sit-in in the girl's toilets in highschool (10 hours in a toilet, beyond school hours is not fun) just so one transgirl would be given her right to use the girls bathroom with the rest of us girls, I'm so very irked with you right now because now I'm dealing with ANOTHER discrimination. Feminists often don't like me because I support men and trans rights. MRAS often find a…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 11:24 AM
1

Please, for the love of god, READ the thread. That's not in there anywhere, I tried multiple searches.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 11:02 AM
2

...that's defending trans rights, you know that right? Defending that transwomen people are discriminated against doubly so because of being trans first and foremost, but also because their gender identity is not being recognised and they're being discriminated against as men and not treated as the women they are. I'm not going to heavily research the site linked in the thread, but it APPEARS to be a feminist blog. /watching you shoot yourself in the foot Edit: also, I posted in that thread. It …
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:52 AM
9

Doctors simply do not want to work in rural areas. We literally have a rotation where I live, because they hate it here so much - poorer equipment, less business, less professional-world contact. They're paying doctors to work in rural areas, and even then often they don't want to stay. And I'm not even extremely isolated, just moderately rural. Yes, all the plane and helicopter services are good, and I praise them. But the lack of medical services in rural areas is because the government doesn'…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:49 AM
2

filler I see how this is.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:42 AM
2

I'm sorry? Does every person insensitive (through ignorance or malice) walk around with a tattoo that reads "MRA" on their foreheads? Gay people are often hard on trans people (lesbians wanting to be with transmen because they see it as "super butch lesbian", for example), too, but you're not bringing that up. Evidence, please.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:29 AM
2

It's not an MRA thing. Regardless of gender, trans issues are often misunderstood, sometimes innocently, sometimes not - and that needs to be fixed. Trans people need their rights defended more than men, women, gay people, in my eyes.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:25 AM
7

I live in a rural area of NSW, and let me tell you, it's not THAT uncommon out here for girls to be having sex at that age. It's terrible, and shouldn't be happening, and they're stupid - but having heard a 13 and 14 year old banging loudly, daily, when I visited my friend (one of the kids was my friend's sibling.. weirdly, the friend and myself were several years older and virgins :/) desensitised me to the "ONLY SICK GROWN-UPS HAVE SEX WITH YOUNG TEENS". No, sorry. They have sex with each othe…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:42 AM
1

And that's what happens on a feminist subreddit aimed at feminists. Something everyone, especially the people on that subreddit, are aware of. I'm not going to get into a huge debate about what is rape. I'm just pointing out that "They did it first!" isn't a very good excuse for something. If your friend jumped off a cliff etc... I mean shit, people jump to conclusions favouring the side of the story they see (sometimes simply the man's side) on MensRights. Because it's MensRights, and it's rele…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:23 AM
9

What a horrible, sociopathic person.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 04:37 AM
-1

You disgust me. There is nowhere near enough information either way to make any judgement on that woman. You're shit-stirring between MensRights and feminist subreddits over something that is not tangible enough to draw ANY conclusions about. If she really was raped, (violently or if she was passed out) her boyfriend and friends would not get mad at her. You know little to nothing about the nature of rape, or even people in general. Assumed consent is not consent, you asshole. That's even the bi…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 04:34 AM
1

I had posted that previous comment of mine when Sigi1 had made a long wall of text post. He corrected it with the link. Thanks anyway.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 02:06 AM
1

:O Do 2 & 3 at once. For science and justice. Meatspin, Grylls style.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 04:15 PM
2

How freaking cool is that, right? I can stick fingers in TWO holes with one hand. I'd love a penis for a day, though. Posted this before, but I'd; Fap myself into oblivion Piss all over the place Helicopter it 2 & 3 at once.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 04:04 PM
0

Yeah, fuck everything about that phrasing.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 04:02 PM
1

I would bite chunks of your flesh out if you tried to forcibly enter my uterus, due to how disgustingly disrespectful of my reproductive rights that it. Consider it a copyright on my DNA that can be enforced. I've said it before, gender rights should not be about bringing everyone down to the lowest common denominator, but bringing everyone UP to the same level.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 03:48 PM
1

Cheers, brorrito.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 03:03 PM
16

I was being intentionally ridiculous, they deserve it. No, you're a troll. By the way, I'm a mad cunt and I'm worth more than my "gash". Lets not forget my mouth, and ass - which incidentally has never been as full of shit as you. /eyeroll
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:45 PM
1

I agree. Poorly described, and taken slightly out of context. I mean... I don't want to sound like a heartless bitch. But she's (woman in article) nearly 70 and has no life skills outside of housekeeping (a product of her time more than a choice, like most women can make these days). Being that she's so aged... well shit. It's not like he's going to be paying out his ass for the next 40 years. On face value it's an exceptional circumstance. It'd be different if she were younger and their marriag…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:33 PM
2

Sorry man, but TLDR without paragraphs.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:26 PM
23

Yeah, they're hypocritical. Also, half the words you use are "bitch" and "cunt", and condescending stuff. If you can't make your arguments without profanity, they're just as invalid They're not making a good case for themselves. But neither are you - you make us all look bad. I love me some men's rights, but you're acting like troll. Personally, I think you are. And yes, a chick. A cunt to be more specific. Worth nothing more than the gash between her legs. You're also an asshole. If I weren't a…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:37 PM
2

If a woman hits her man, he must have fucked up or she felt threatened. If a woman hits her woman, it's up in the air. If a man hits his man, it's because men are violent (or sometimes the more "feminine" is the victim). If a man hits his woman, he must be an asshole. Hooooray for stereotypes being default assumptions! Domestic violence is never okay for anyone. ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
/r/MensRights14/08/11 10:46 AM
6

Yeah, I totally hate myself. I love it when people come here and tell me that I hate myself because I want my father, brothers, and boyfriend to have legally enforced equal rights in areas they don't just as much as I want them for myself. Bit of a different frustration for me, heh. Blanket-generalisations are horseshit for errybody involved and accomplish nothing but the muddying of already clouded waters.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 10:27 AM
1

I'm so glad Kloo is in charge, because I'd just spend a whole hour banning and unbanning you for the pleasure of being able to ban you more than once.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:35 AM
3

Who do you think is potentially impregnating these women? The woman takes pills/has minor surgical procedures/inserts things/has greater responsibility for remembering birth control. Yeah, it's still unbalanced, but for every women taking birth control there is probably one man protected by it. I'd seriously have loved to have not have HAD to be the one going on contraception. Incision hurt, lots of bruising, and the arm my implant is in gets occasional twinges. I have side effects because I use…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:29 AM
1

Still conjured up awful imagery of pain in my mind, but with double the humiliation aspect because you're actually citing a specific person by name and his humiliation is your platform. Rape jokes, which I am not a fan of myself, are usually based on a generalised abomination of a crime as opposed to individual traumas.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:10 AM
0

It's some people's opinion that rape jokes are funny and it should be fine to tell them. It's other people's opinion that if rape jokes are told and found offensive, it should be fine to tell the joke-maker to blow it out their crass ass and remind them that some of their audience could be genuinely negatively affected by them. Personally, I feel neither is more valid than the other. I'm not one for censorship.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:07 AM
2

Thank you for not feeding.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 08:08 AM
1

I was under the impression victim blaming is when you fault the victim for being victimized Yeah. Is extrapolating that putting yourself in a more defenseless position, like walking alone at night, make you a victim blamer? Yeah.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 03:52 AM
0

And I very much agree. But OP didn't mention anything much about her besides her being a sexist bitch, and being a lesbian. I know not all lesbians are the same. All my friends are men and lesbians. But "lesbian separatism" is so very rare, it most definitely should not be considered the default. Your bisexuality doesn't affect my view of your opinion. I've been a Clit Commando and a Cock Connoisseur too.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 02:40 AM
1

The fuck? No. I was pointing out how stupid some of the accusations r/amr makes. On their own subreddit, on r/mr, and on 2X. Edit: Officially banned from r/amr as of right now.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 02:31 AM
0

quoting somebody else doesnt make you smart or right. Shows how much attention you're paying to anything I say. I quoted myself.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:59 PM
0

I'm not trying to ignore her sexuality. I'm making the point that it shouldn't be relevant enough to make it a main point of the story. Yet I find myself having to defend the stance that being a lesbian is not at all inherently antimale.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:39 PM
-2

Nope. It's not at all. It's what I have been saying all thread. Being a jerk is not related to sexuality. Being a jerk is due to external influences and personal choices. And you first tried to oppose me on that, now you're agreeing. At least I'm consistent, even if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:36 PM
0

Yes, in some places lesbians are more exposed to antimale propaganda. It's still influence and choice, not sexuality that makes some of them buy that shit Source: being a mainstayer in the local lesbian scene and having never once met an antimale lesbian out of the dozens I know.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:35 PM
-2

Your denial is giving me a boner. Yes, in some places lesbians are more exposed to antimale propaganda. It's still influence and choice, not sexuality that makes some of them buy that shit.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:32 PM
-3

That's an incredibly homophobic generalisation, yet it still backs my point of being an asshole is a matter of influences and personal choice, NOT sexuality.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:21 PM
-2

So you believe that somehow a person can be born sexist, like you can be "born" gay? Because being an asshole is 100% influence and personal choice, to me. (I put "born" in quotes because I feel a bit weird giving babies sexualities)
/r/MensRights10/08/11 07:13 PM
-1

So basically a complicated version of "Some gay people happen to be jerks, just like some straight people do". Okay, cool.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:59 PM
4

I guess I'm pointing out that she is a Lesbian to explain the situation. You have issues just as much as she does. I'm out, you're not getting the point.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:52 PM
3

Lesbianism is not related to man hate/fear. Man hate/fear is. Sexuality doesn't have anything to do with sexism. That's where your entire argument falls apart. Your racism example is not equivalent, either.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:36 PM
2

It says you're reading her sexuality into who she is, which is a passive homophobic thing - her lesbianism is not related to her being a jerk. She's a jerk who just happens to be a lesbian.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:23 PM
6

I understand your distress, but I don't think her sexuality is a factor. It says more about you than her, that you brought it up. Ignore her, like you would any jerk.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:15 PM
4

You're such a fucking asshat. My brain is full of fuck.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:28 AM
6

As a Jewish person, I find your comparison that it "is like saying to Jews that you're one of the good antisemites" rather offensive. ... At the risk of offending you even further This is when you STFU because your argument is made moot. I don't necessarily agree with OP, but this is when you lay that particular argument to rest.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 08:52 PM
2

Cheers, thanks for understanding. It's nice shit like this that keeps me here. I'm looking forward to any circle-jerks or debates in future :P
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:29 PM
3

Thank you for articulating what I couldn't. I'm into BDSM, but I've also been sexually assaulted. Thingsarebad is someone I just don't like, yet I agree with this clip portraying rape. However, "no" should never be taken as "yes" unless specifically discussed and agreed upon first. No means no, male or female. Even in BDSM, no means no - it's just the word used for "no" is often changed.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 10:25 AM
2

I understand, of course. In fact, halfway through that post it occurred to me that there is the stereotype that r/mr is just "evil woman-hating menz", and that in fact asserting your difference from that stereotype at least occasionally could help disprove that - I'm a female MRA, myself :) But when I started mentioning that thought in my other post, it got too ramble-y. Honestly, I got paid today and at this point in the evening, I'm tipsy. I'm truly sorry if you thought I was at all criticisin…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 09:24 AM
2

That'd just be fucking awful. While she is an awful person and a liar who should be punished, she would not deserve to be raped, and he would be an abhorrent person to do so. Injustice done to oneself does not validate committing injustices against others. (The above it not specifically directed at you, it is also directed at the replies to your post). But yeah, it would be ironic by definition.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 08:26 AM
1

I don't mean to be an ass, but "2X here" doesn't validate or discredit your opinion here. Your opinion itself it what is what is judged here - one of the good things about r/mr. :)
/r/MensRights09/08/11 08:21 AM
2

MisterPartyPants is just a bitter person. She talked some shit on 2X, and it didn't go down well. As I recall, it was basically that yes 2X WAS being overrun by XY and some pretty bitchy remarks about men in general, as well as something about going SCUM on the 2X mens asses. GravenPetal is another over-zealous and aggressive feminist who posts antimale things on 2X which are also poorly received often. It's kinda funny seeing radical feminists trying to start circlejerks on 2X and getting shot …
/r/MensRights09/08/11 06:03 AM
6

Secondly, the young child has not much pain, because the skin is tender, and the imagination weak; for grown-up persons are in dread and fear of things which they imagine as coming It's this shit that enrages me most, I think. What the fuck? I don't have a penis, so I don't think it's empathy pain so much as "maternal instincts". I find myself over and over telling people to look at this. It's a popular circumcision FAQ thing here. In Australia, circumcision is far less common and treated more c…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:30 AM
1

Haha, yeah.... it's a load of crap. 2X had heaps of fun with this recently. Lots of them loved most of the list. The mother one seems to be the only one most people there agree would be a bit awkward, with "Find out what your date likes, and maybe take turns at choosing if you don't like the same stuff" being the consensus. This isn't exactly a credible article, but it's a good example of a woman being sexist about other women whilst being sexist to men. I'd be angrier about that, but I'm tired.…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 07:48 PM
8

Because women never rape women? The entire thing is an insult to every conceivable gender or sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:37 PM
8

This is all really awesome. Good on him for quick-thinking and shame on her for being a liar and an asshole. Pity that awesome didn't extend to the comments - you think "Oh, one or two racist idiots"... and then notice that they have multiple "likes". Bah.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 02:16 AM
1

It's iffy to admit it here, but on a global scale - third world countries, countries with strict religious laws that literally outline women as property, countries that let girls who aren't even menstruating be married off etc.. - women do have it worse, in almost every way. However, in first-world countries, I think it's much the same amount of discrimination distributed in different areas for each gender. The difference is, there are almost certainly no third-world or religious dictatorship fe…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:31 AM
3

It's not about "not wanting to let them have a family" - that's an incredible extrapolation! There is more than one way to have a family, and to be fair, they chose an option in which they could be declined. It's not the decliner's fault should they decline. It's not like declining to personally donate sperm is preventing them asking someone else, getting an anonymous donation, looking into adoption. Sure, it might be inconvenient that they didn't get the desired outcome with their first try, bu…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:40 AM
2

If someone is going to discriminate based on something he has no control over - they're not worth his time. All the better to weed out the right person. I specifically used gender-neutral terms, as I don't like imposing sexual-preferences on children, and because I want to specifically point out that - not in this particular case, but it does happen - other men can discriminate. You know, what with homosexuality existing.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 03:37 AM
1

Just because it's not due to your religion and interpretation of your religion doesn't mean it's not due to other prominent religions with roots in the same or circumcision culture. But that's not the point. Religion influenced and entire culture to put babies through excruciating pain for no good reason and make it "normal" to do so, so that even generations later their custom is being continued "because it's normal". It's almost worse that there are people who will blindly go along with it, at…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 03:31 AM
27

mentality You give him too much credit.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:21 PM
3

Because religion. Mostly.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 03:41 PM
2

I'd rather have my arm broken than my spirit. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 03:18 AM
3

Oh no - I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply I thought you'd insulted me or anything. I was just backing up your point - further than me not being hostile, I actually even have a reasonable track record.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:53 PM
2

It's not even that I'm "not hostile" to the MR movement. Look at any of my posts on this subreddit, and the majority are pretty agreeable. Like I said, I just wanted to know if I should speak inclusive of my country, or only specific other countries. Dayum.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:41 PM
2

And I'm damn well fighting the remaining mutilation-mongers here. I can't believe it's taking this long for you to understand that all I wanted to know was if the OP post was intended to refer to everywhere, or revolve solely around specific places so I'd know whether to refer to information pertaining to a specific place or not.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:03 PM
2

Are all Australian's so prickly and defensive when confronted about their country? How about you admit Australia is sexist against men? Confronted by my country? My country in which the vast majority of men have their foreskins? My country in which I'm fighting sexism against men? My country which is different enough from the US or Canada that I just asked for a clarification? It's not closer at all dumbass....it's exactly the same. If you are in the US, having having the majority of men circumc…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:58 PM
0

Actually, I more meant small Catholic circles. My father was circumcised in the name of Catholicism, but none of my brothers are circumcised. Judaism is very uncommon here. You're showing further ignorance whilst attacking someone who sought clarification to prevent their own ignorance. I'm not defending anything. You're just being an aggressive asshole. I merely asked what the context was, since genital mutilation ratios are very different between the countries cited in the thread title and my …
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:40 PM
4

So far as I know, purely out of respect for minorities - and I mean MINORITIES, as in the tiniest percentage, not "not white and jesus-believing" (since "white and jesus-believing" would have to be a majority and it's not). It's a bit of a dick move to rip on a country that's closer to what you want than your own country is (assuming you're in the US, which I did by your other post - sorry if I'm wrong).
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:32 PM
3

Like I said in the post you just responded to; I'm Australian, and we have a lot of first-generation African immigrants from cultures that adhere to FGM customs, and it really could be considered "epidemic" here. Which is a little odd, since male circumcision is little problem here - being circumcised is the abnormality. My cultural background led to some confusion for me. Especially since I'm female and have never had to worry about my nonexistent penis or the uncut men in my life. It is now cl…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:18 PM
1

Thank you for explaining - I really didn't know what to think (d'oh). Like I mentioned - cultural differences, and this is not the same issue here it is in some other places. But now that I know the context, I definitely agree it's abhorrent. It's truly a shame that some of the countries seen as the most forward, are the most backward in the simplest of ways.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:17 PM
5

I don't know if this is posted with sarcastic intent or serious. But I want to point out that regardless, FGM is an issue is other countries. Western countries. I'm Australian, and we have a lot of first-generation African immigrants from cultures that adhere to FGM customs, and it really could be considered "epidemic" here. Which is a little odd, since male circumcision is little problem here - being circumcised is the abnormality. My sincere apologies if you were serious when you posted this. …
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:30 PM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:14 AM
-1

fat and ugly feminists Is that really necessary? Jabs at people's appearance, extrapolation or not, are really not at all relevant to why you disagree with them or dislike them.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:52 AM
5

Hallelujah chorus played in my head when I read this.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:41 AM
3

Well, now that's an entirely different kettle of fish.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 05:37 PM
1

For some people, oblivion can be comfort. That saddens me greatly.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 02:06 PM
2

Context, just in case there is one person on earth who didn't know. I'd agree with the original more than the Copyright-Infringing Circlejerk Remix. Since that guy is a misogynist, not a representative of any genders rights, I'd much rather know so I can weed him out immediately. An obsequious feminist guy - because if you can't shut up about how feminist you are around anything female, you're being obsequious and I don't find that attractive - would be harder to weed out if he's just kissing as…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:00 PM
8

Yeah, I'm extremely in support of circumcision not being performed on children or by force. Should an adult make the choice himself, then I won't tell him what to do with his body. My issue is with the removal of choice. However, the very first thing I spotted on there was a link to here - a post some circumcised guy had made about how frustrated he is an sick of having "There's something wrong with you" and "This thing that you're not is better than you" pushed at him all the time. And he was p…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:01 AM
7

You could try posting more stuff relevant to Europe here.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:12 AM
2

Oh, I know his whole story. I learned it well ia few years ago, after the documentary I saw - I was fascinated and horrified. I meant that if he couldn't bear it to the point of killing himself, I sincerely hope he finally got what he wanted in doing so, even if it's not what he deserved.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:14 AM
3

Awesome, my bad then. I'll check it out. :) God I hate Germaine, though. She's a really unpleasant person. That's why I had such a strong aversion reaction.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 07:31 AM
5

This was horrific. I watched a long documentary about it once. Family footage, they interviewed his parents. I spent nearly the entire things crying - especially at the home videos of him as a child throwing tantrums about not wanting to go see the asshole doctor who pioneered this sick fuckery. Psychological and physical torture from birth to death. And he wasn't some war-baby in a prison camp all his life. The people who were meant to protect and care for him did it to him. Yet he still had it…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 04:05 AM
3

All I saw was Greer in the link. I didn't read it. I assumed Germaine Greer tripe. Yes, I am in a position to call it tripe. I have met Germaine Greer.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 03:29 AM
4

SHIT! There was a post on 2X a while ago, from a woman, and she wrote a very comprehensive post about experiencing sexism from both sides, as she had made the transition from being a man to being and living as a woman. I'll try find it so I can post it here. It may not be spot-on, but it's about as close as you can get.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 02:18 PM
1

Wow. I mean, everyone has a couple of little things that annoys them about their partner, or the occasional frustration. But her life seems to revolve around finding fault in everything he does. You don't publicly humiliate and demean someone you love. my husband is super-thin. I mean the kind of thin where he could probably stand to eat a few cartons of ice cream a day to gain some weight. Meanwhile, if I have even a few spoonfuls of ice cream I see it in my thighs the next day I had a wry smil…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 02:05 PM
8

Don't you ever feel any pang of conscience that you're so vehemently promoting something that even in the name alone is promoting the oppression and degradation of an entire demographic? One which makes up about half the human race, I might add. Don't you ever see the parallels between that and anti-women propaganda of the days of women's suffrage? The spite and mockery directed at the women who cared enough to stand up in a hostile environment and say "This is not fair. What's good for the gand…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:48 PM
-1

Good god damnit. It's not about you or the subreddit. It's directed at OP. OP should not be asking people to excuse actions, they should be setting an example to the people they're apologising/explaining for.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:47 AM
2

This is a perfect summary. I actually thought "...with sheets" when I read it, too. I give a particular fuck about this, too.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:08 AM
1

I'm sure their intentions are good.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 10:55 AM
0

My father is a strict man, and I think I will use his words to explain what I actually meant; "Before you get angry, let me explain why I did it..." "You shouldn't be telling me not to be angry, you should be setting a good example and not fucking up."
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:12 AM
-1

You've got to be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:01 AM
1

Yet again, I have not disagreed with you. I do not know why you keep reiterating your point like that. However, now I am going to - slightly. It is posted in reddit.com, which is more male than female, and has had much worse things than this posted. I am not aware of anything being removed from reddit.com, so without any such knowledge, I do not think Feminist groups or their mods have much bearing on how shit is done in reddit.com.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:52 AM
3

I was simply pointing out that I am female, thus part of the "XX contingent", and I did not do as you said. I was also asserting (in a very unclear fashion) that since Reddit consists of far more male users than female users, that a significant enough portion of the upvotes theoretically HAD to come from men - so blanket-blaming it on chicks would be somewhat of a sexist remark. Had this been in 2X or feminisms - predominantly female users - I'd not have been so persnickety about it. I didn't in…
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:23 AM
5

This made me teary. I saw my pregnant mother swing a huge stool at my father. I saw the shattered door and blood on the floor from when she threw her boyfriend through a glass door. He is an emotionally/physically abusive bastard himself who deserved it, but nonetheless my mother is still fucking crazy, despite being tiny. I saw the jagged, deep cuts streaking across the face and neck of my regular friend/husband of my mother's best friend/taxi driver, from when his wife threw his fucking boots …
/r/MensRights02/08/11 01:29 AM
3

You give me one example of me genuinely trolling this subreddit, me being "fat, ugly, or probably both", or me being "awful to other people" and maybe I'll buy that generalizing bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 12:15 AM
6

No, I don't. Generalizations like that hurt men's rights and make you look like a jerk. Being sexist is not a solution to sexism.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 12:10 AM
0

I don't come here to see dudes with guns.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 12:06 AM
2

You best be trollin', sucka.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:23 PM
8

I'm a chick and I really don't care, hah. I've never understood people in general not simply checking - you'd think it would be common sense.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:56 AM
0

What hoo-hah. The Vic bushfires were an ongoing catastrophe and it would be unreasonable to expect the people working for emergency services to just completely opt-out of the rest of their lives for over a week. Ms Nixon is right, it was up to the Royal Commission to decide if she acted appropriately. She said this when she faced the RC; It was not my job to swoop in and take control. When you have good people who are more skilled in emergency management than I am you let those people do the job…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:47 AM
2

Can you think of a single privilege that society confers on a female African American lesbian? She couldn't be forced to perform military service. She'd likely be given preference in evacuation situations because she is a woman. Female-only scholarships, ladies night at clubs, plenty of car insurance companies would charge her less because women are statistically less likely to be in accidents. I understand what you're trying to do, but you aren't going to win any hearts over with easily disprov…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:33 AM
1

Oh I know he posted to 2X. He's stirred plenty of shit over there the past few days and come here to lie about it.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:06 PM
1

I can't believe you don't fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:02 AM
2

Okay.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:08 AM
31

Thanks for the level post. As a female MRA, it can end up feeling weird that I'm arguing with male radical feminists (had some exasperation at Manboobz recently on 2X) because the stereotypes are that MRAs are all men and radical feminists are all female, and it's just not true.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:04 AM
6

LOL fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:56 PM
1

A pretty crass way of putting it, but I have to agree. I've lived overseas extensively and women don't misbehave like they do here in the west when it's that time of the month. Here women are told it's okay so they mouth off, throw things, and so on, right down to making a joke of it and putting slogans about being a bitch because they're PMSing on freaking key-chains at Gadzooks. It's like being a bitch and mistreating others is their right or something for some women. And they get away with it…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:43 AM
3

Again, I'll point out that your comment in that thread was upvoted quite a bit, had more than one well-thought-out and logical response written to it, and things only got nasty when you started accusing the women of 2X of things they had not in fact done. YOU came to 2X and were rude to them, insulted them, and now you're here crying victim. Here is the thread again. Look, see how, chronologically, you started being rude and aggressive to Bobsutan's reasonable and agreeable reply, before anyone …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:37 PM
2

This would be cool if the majority of 2X hadn't agreed with and upvoted you (myself included - in the first hour of the thread posting). In fact, one of the downvoted comment of yours there is you being inflammatory and rude to someone who bothered to write a comprehensive response agreeing with your original point. Just seems a bit like shit-stirring, to me.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:24 AM
1

You don't have to have a disease to be a carrier, you goddamned fucking moron. It's like the ginger gene. Or in my family, Porphyria. My dad doesn't have it, but since it runs in his family I'll need to be tested. And since I know who my father is, I knew who to ask about what runs in his family in order to know that. And it's not such a crazy scenario, either. Maybe the parents broke up briefly and slept with other people. Maybe they had a threesome and didn't use protection. Maybe the mother f…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:06 AM
1

That is why I said it was.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 09:48 PM
1

Comment at the top of the rape supporter entry I linked.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 09:47 PM
2

I stand by pretty much all I've said about her, but I really didn't think of it that way in so much detail - I mentioned in a different post how I feel she's fabricates things that "prove" and "support" her theories, and this makes that process more understandable at the very least.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:55 PM
3

kelly says: May 18, 2011 at 10:36 pm Virtually every man I have ever know in my entire life fits this entire list to a “T”. Every last one of them. This is a great post! It should be read to every male on every college campus on the first day of school before they even get through the front door. The 2X ladies are probably responsible for a lot of the sanity on there - as I mentioned in another comment, this was recently posted there much to the pants-shitting rage of the 2X subscribers.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 06:34 PM
1

What the fuck am I reading. How do we even breed? :|
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:40 PM
1

Apologies, I didn't mean you. I forgot for a moment that I'd have to specify (as likely only I'd seen the post). I've now forgotten who it was (well, I have a guess but I might be wrong, so I won't risk anything on a shoddy memory).
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:29 PM
1

It lends itself to heteronormative pigeon-holing Did you miss the "Other (please clarify in comment field)" option? I think it's the opposite. That because male/female/transgender are widespread, established as inoffensive, and apply to the majority of the population is why those are specifically listed. And so as to not offend anyone by using incorrect/offensive terms or pigeonhole anyone, the option of self-definition was made available. I'd already quoted your reply, didn't matter that it was…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:18 PM
1

The questions were clearly written by a feminist, you can tell by the wording. Eg. "Question 1) What gender do you most closely identify with?" The options are male / female / transgender. I'm afraid I do not see what you're alluding to. How is that specifically feminist?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:11 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:03 PM
1

You're still only reading what you want to, which somewhat proves my point about you only reading what you want to. Instead of shrugging off that 2X actually was not the enemy in this particular instance I brought up, you're determined to paint them so based on separate-to-this-instance indiscretions. I said nothing about anything here being abuse apology, so you can take that turd and stop trying to put it in my mouth. I said you'll get extremists and idiots everywhere and showed an example as …
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:33 PM
1

I am no longer partaking in this conversation as you are only saying the same thing over and over, and not addressing much of what I say - which does agree with you on the main parts. You are attempting to be inflammatory by extrapolating things about the sort of person I am and what I would do in given situations. I would argue that you get the same proportion of extremists and idiots on /r/mensrights as you do 2X, but 2X is larger. Such as this. Being a person who has been sexually assaulted, …
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:14 PM
1

You train your dog with smacks, I train mine with positive reinforcement of the correct behavior.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:06 PM
2

Yes, sorry Sigi1 :) It'd be easier for me to elaborate on listed items I'm NOT guilty of. Some of the scariest parts are in the comments, though, when she replies - seeing her slip up on her own fucked logic is almost sad, but scary in that she isn't just mentally ill, oh no, she's somehow fabricated things that "prove" and "support" her theories and feels they make sense. The best person at convincing someone of something is someone who believes it themselves, you know? :|
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:02 PM
2

are not a gender rights board - they make no claim to be unbiased That pretty much recaps my point on it. Understand, I'm not trying to attack you or discredit you. I just feel you're unjustifiably being biased yourself in this case - when shown an example of goodness, you don't react along the lines of "Well, that's one good thing" or "A step in the right direction", you jump to "But there's other stuff I disagree with!", which isn't very fair. It's like when an article was posted on 2X about p…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:58 AM
2

Nah, I suffer an enormous amount of continent-country ego :P
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:40 AM
4

It's not as denied as you think. You gotta take the bad with the good. I do it when I come here. Assholes are everywhere, and just because a place has some doesn't mean it's full of them.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:38 AM
3

I know! Fuck. This is why I got so interested in mens rights - according to this heinous cunt, the things I ASK my partner to do to/with me to make ME happy and sexually satisfied make HIM a bad person if he does them? I'm guilty of at least half the list she posts, myself. I hate pissbucket feminists. All man hate and being more concerned about whether I had a rum and coke before happily and consensually fucking my partner silly than they are about women in countries where they can be married o…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:31 AM
1

I wasn't saying that the survey question was right, just that it specified continents - which Australiasia is not. The standard "Australia and Oceania" I'm always having to pick would probably be correct.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:23 AM
7

I'm not entering this argument, as it will be pointless and unnecessarily vexing for both of us. I'll acknowledge there is some absolute horseshit on 2X, but they are not a gender rights board - they make no claim to be unbiased. You get horseshit posted here, too, sometimes. TLDR; You get horseshit everywhere. It's the places dedicated to horseshit you should be worrying about, not the few incidental people who post it in otherwise unremarkable places.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:17 AM
10

No. It was posted to 2X as a WTF thing, and they collectively shat their pants with rage and posted arguments to her on her site. Gotta get over some of the 2X hate. You get some stupid shit there, but it's not a man-hating subreddit and there are a some great female MRAs there (like me - though I wouldn't say I'm great, hah).
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:04 AM
7

That's up to the people in charge here. And banning the mods won't stop the other users -the mods of r/againstmensrights are half the entire userbase in the first place.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:00 AM
0

Australasia is not a continent. Australia is.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:58 AM
3

I'd like to see Mediterranean on the ethnicity section. Did not complete survey.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:56 AM
2

This woman is completely batshit (a Pissbucket Feminist™). Just look at this entry that was posted on 2X a while ago. I don't know how she sleeps at night.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:38 AM
8

I agree with you - a non-white man is still a man, and in my mind oppressing or espousing hate against any man based on his race is a violation of what mens rights is about. But subreddits have a modlist. The fact that it'd be much harder to find every non-mod white supremacist posting/voting on /r/mensrights is probably why nothing large-scale has been done.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:33 AM
5

Feminism is mistakenly thought to still be about equality. It's like pissing in a bucket of water - piss enough, and you'll dilute the water to mostly piss. "Feminism" is a bucket of piss these days, from all the crazy and ignorant that attached to it over the years, especially the past decade when it became a fad. Ideals in line with the perceived view of modern feminism still exist, we just go by different names (like you, I'm a women's rights supporter/men's rights supporter, or egalitarian) …
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:20 AM
6

Very much agree. Of course you will come across an MRA/feminist* at least once in your life who IS bitter about women/men for some reason - that's just a sad person clinging to something in order to try validate their pre-existing feelings and justify holding onto them for so long. I think this is the case here - thepinkmask had a couple of bad encoutners with MRAs, so ALL MRAs are bad. *I use that term carefully, as sadly some self-proclaimed feminists are not yet aware that women's rights are …
/r/MensRights20/07/11 02:57 PM
2

A downvote hurts my brain less than some of the idiocy the people who did it would try to tell me in explanation. Still a load of horseshit that it happens, though.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:00 PM
9

So even though I come here a couple of times a month and have made a handful of posts, I'm to be forbidden from a cause I could very much get behind if it's being managed properly (as I'm open for intelligent debate)? I'll stick with r/mensrights, 2X, r/lgbt, and r/bdsmcommunity, if you're going to paint a large group of people with such a broad brush - I'm a woman, a hardcore Sub, with strong ties to LGBT community both by association and personally. Not what you expected, I'd guess. The entire…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:48 PM
2

OP has been trolling 2X for a while now. Thanks for reading before raging, gents.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:09 PM
1

As a woman who can pee standing up without any aides, I object.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:36 PM
1

I hate that I now have to call myself a believer in women's rights and men's rights separately. Once, being a feminist meant trying to make both genders equal. The name "feminist" has been soiled and metaphorically raped by people (women AND some men) using it as a validation for their own fucked, misandrist views. The ideals are still the same, we just call ourselves something different these days so as not to be associated with a new era of sexism and superiority complexes. Feminism these days…
/r/MensRights19/06/11 12:11 PM
1

Alright, in that case I'm sorry. One hit is reasonable, and just because she's a woman does not mean her shitty behavior is excused - I know that better than anyone. An asshole is an asshole - we say "asshole" and not "vagina" or "penis" for a reason.... everyone has one and can be one. The wording just struck me as being more violent than it turned out the situation was, and I was mistaken :) I, personally, DO see self defense as something to allow me to extricate myself from the situation, bec…
/r/MensRights19/06/11 11:58 AM
2

I'm from Aus as well, and I very much agree that there are some aggressive and downright misandrist women here (funny thing, my spell-check does not recognize "misandry" or "misandrist" as words... says a lot) - you were very right to defend yourself. But I feel that "lights out and lots of blood" pushes the boundaries of reason a bit. Fair enough to get a hit or two in so you have time to get away - it's what I've done in the past when I've been in altercations with men (I'd expect that in same…
/r/MensRights19/06/11 11:34 AM
1

I wouldn't say so. You can be a deadshit without being a bludger. You'll get deadshit tradies (builders labourers etc.. if that term isn't in your country), deadshit checkout chicks. Even deadshit people outside the lower working class - members of parliament, solicitors, business owners. And to go in the opposite direction, bludgers/"bludgers" aren't necessarily deadshits. A persons means don't dictate who they are, is essentially what I'm saying :)
/r/MensRights10/06/11 12:50 PM
1

I'm from Australia, so I wouldn't know :) (if we have an equivalent here, it's deadshit or useless cunt)
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:44 PM
2

I know they are, and they have a very precise meaning (there is no confusion about what being a rapist is, the same can't be said for cunt) unlike asshole or cunt. I was more addressing "deadbeat", which I have never known to be stereotypically gender-specific. I of course, regardless of my XXness know that "rapist" is definitely applied to men far more often than women, and that it DOES happen unfairly or untruly. The point I was making in that post was that he chose those particular words, wor…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:14 PM
2

Because programmed sexism of both sexes to both sexes dictates that he associates those terms with men, is my guess.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:18 PM
2

Fuck etiquette. Fuck you, you're a malicious, stupid cunt making shit up to feel superior. Die in a fire.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter