TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Why_the_hate_ Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Why_the_hate_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Are they as a company paying them this because they also unfairly pay them? Seems like it to me. If you believe in equality and the wages are the same for your men and women then you wouldn’t be paying them extra because the wage gap doesn’t exist, right?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:14 PM
3

Even if you don’t think Johnny is innocent she definitely was abusive. It’s possibly for both to be. Therefore, either way, this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:33 PM
3

Not in the US. Breast cancer has more cases and deaths with a slightly higher chance of death according to cancer.gov. This could be due to more attention to it or other causes. Australia was a place that was the opposite last time I checked. Also if it bothers you, make sure to donate some of your time to spreading information about it. Simple things like getting your city council to acknowledge and raise money would help.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 10:12 PM
22

What about single dads with kids? It’s not like they couldn’t check for that when handing it out. Heck, we have gay dads too now. And they’re still men and being excluded while possibly also being unemployed with kids.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 02:02 PM
77

I saw something about BLM when searching and it looks like they donated some money and sent out an email but other than that I haven’t seen anything super cringey. I searched dollar shave virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 06:28 PM
2

Couldn’t most people claim that being angry is going to lead to not being sound of mind? Given what she did before this and her comments it sure sounded like she was sane enough to know what she was doing. But anyway. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:57 PM
3

Wouldn’t this be premeditated though? Sounds like it.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 03:05 PM
5

It makes sense and is based on data. However, it’s basically like preexisting conditions which I personally do not agree with since health insurance is very much necessary for a lot if not all of the population.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 06:36 PM
1

Or maybe it does hurt but as a parent I would understand why it was done by the kid after finding out what mine did.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:20 PM
6

A lot of people are arguing about how you’re bringing an innocent party into it. The point was that he posted that knowing it would hurt her daughter and it was the most obvious way. Unless the kid does that all the time it isn’t REALLT slut shaming, just revenge. Plus, she’s an adult. She was probably not hurt by a kids statements on a photo she publicly posted or should at least understand why a hormonal kid who loves their brother did what they did. If I was attacked because of a bad mistake …
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:19 PM
8

I should have said isn’t always fun. Didn’t mean to make it seem so much like a chore.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:55 AM
28

It’s like women incels. It’s absurd. Raising kids isn’t fun and sometimes means you spend more time with them than you want. I would understand a man or a women saying this. Just because there are women out there who don’t complain doesn’t mean that all women are happy doing it all the time.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:06 AM
3

Just looked that up. Get your hands but when he gets his hands out he gets shot. Such bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:17 PM
0

Report it and use that as an example.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 07:35 PM
7

Old judges and old laws. I will say in this respect, a lot of times it’s men hurting older men with their antiquated views.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 01:11 PM
11

They also have smaller bladders, have to sit down, and generally take longer. It’s like nobody has ever been to a football game. I’ve been in and out and through 20 people in the time it takes the women’s to move five.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:06 PM
2

I like this. Seems like a great way to do this.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:51 AM
2

I would have said something like “Yes sir I am here alone and until you tell me what I’ve actually done wrong I will continue to sit here and read my book. This is a public park. Just because someone is judgmental does not mean I’ve done something wrong.” Probably find someway for the asshole who called it in to hear because I’m sure they would be nearby.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:49 AM
1

Well to be honest it most likely has more to do with dollar shave club and groups like that.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:55 AM
-5

My question is this: did they do it that way because women use it generally more often and have more trouble holding it or because of the reasons some people want to see here? I think it should be equal but still.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:32 PM
-1

This use of affair most likely means event and they said she faced race charges. There is nothing wrong with this article title.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:13 PM
5

What the rate of breast cancer in Germany though? In Australia it’s lower than prostate but in the US for example the reverse is true. May be the same in Germany - supply and demand.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:54 PM
5

They’re a different type of fat as well if I recall correctly. It’s not the same as this.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:56 PM
2

There are people that like fat people and think they’re pretty, but the fatter you are the smaller that pool will be. I mean fat as in WAYYYY smaller than that. This is absurd. Nobody thinks that’s pretty. I’m not even sure someone with a fat fetish would.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:55 PM
-5

To be fair, SOME of that is because people were held back and isn’t do certain things in the past. Women doctors for example (instead of nurses). However, that’s simply something that needs time to change and I’m sure it’s already evening out.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:01 PM
2

Some of these posts are just giving them fire. Sure she’s an idiot but building the entire human civilization? Really? Just because you’re pro men’s rights doesn’t mean you can make statements like that and ignore women’s roles. Women have been (and in other countries still are) treated as second class birthing citizens. This is like saying to black people “you’re welcome for bringing you here and building this” in the USA. Many groups were discriminated against. Because of that they didn’t GET …
/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:36 AM
1

By the time the science proved it was safe I probably wouldn’t need it because I’d be too old for it to matter. Haha.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:49 PM
1

Actually, there is a bias in favor of women in the justice system in some cases and much of it comes from male judges many of which do subscribe to stereotypes (or apply laws which were made with those in mind). Paternity rights and cases are an example of this. I wouldn’t say she is correct but a part of it could very well be because of an unconscious bias in favor of women. It’s still sexist to men but at the same time if a judge sentenced them lightly because they’re “fragile” that would also…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:55 PM
1

This is a very good, very funny point. The irony really is strong.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:43 AM
1

That was more of a harassing on the street situation though it seemed and he was gonna be one of those loud and annoying people that nobody likes. It wasn’t sexual assault or anything, you’re right, but it didn’t look great. I think the bullying part was about males because that’s who Gillette advertises to mainly. I would say with bullying it’s probably mostly girls bullying girls and guys bullying guys hence the presentation. I’m not saying girls or guys don’t bully the other sex just that it’…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:31 PM
8

How hard is it to keep both people until the police arrive? I don’t understand.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:22 AM
1

Dude. I don’t know all the details of the case. You probably don’t either. Just chill. If you have a problem with someone learning more about it then you’re the one with an issue.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 11:41 PM
3

Do you have evidence he knew what those were? Just because he’s a drinker doesn’t mean he knows what those terms mean.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:46 PM
15

I saw very similar articles and if you click the links then you’ll find similar things as well. In fact, quora was saying similar things about men as well. Encourage them etc etc. The algorithms also take into account clicks, specific terms, popularity of websites, etc and honestly nobody except the engineers really know how stuff is being ranked. In fact, the lovepanky website, despite its title actually gave good points.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:25 AM
7

Sometimes I think America has it bad and then I see how the judges are in the UK.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:22 AM
1

I talked about this somewhere else and if you want to blame anyone, blame men. They get in wrecks more (btw I’m a dude). It’s based off of statistics. I understand both sides, truly. But there is a good reason for it. It’s just like how different areas are going to be more expensive. If they didn’t do that the rates might even be a lot higher for everyone. To mitigate these things they offer things like good driver bonuses and other things and they should be required to slowly lower rates to an …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:40 AM
1

Yep. Possibly. But she did go through rehab and attempt to clean up. Saw it in the news. At that point many people are going to have more sympathy because someone tried to quit. You know what I’m saying?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:25 PM
1

Also the reasons they did it matter. Did he start for fun while she did it to deal with depression or something? People starts drugs for different reasons. They both need help, but sympathy differs due to things like why they started in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:20 AM
1

Everyone’s definition of rich or poor depends on the situation they were in previously. Compared to him that is a lot less money. If someone divorces and gets 200 million while the other gets a billion there are still going to be complaints.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:24 AM
1

It likely a group of people causing an outrage because women are treated like that or a group focusing on women. So when the judges or groups of people speak about it, that’s what they’ll focus on. Basically it’s going to take the equivalent to bring this up for men. Also I don’t know the statistics for there but it could be men are usually in for worse crimes. I don’t think it’s an inherently sexist thing.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:34 AM
1

I’m saying if this happened 50% of taxpayers would now have a choice the other 50% already had making it fair for them. I know the percentages don’t line up like that, but still.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:22 PM
1

To be fair that’s exactly what the argument made is (for the first option, and possibly the third, not rape). As is, a man can already be held accountable for their mistake while a woman has a way out. The two options are either outlaw abortion or allow men to opt out of parental duties if you want things to be fair.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:27 AM
1

Male contraception isn’t really viable yet mainly because it has wayyyy more side effects than the woman equivalent (unless there is a brand new version out there I haven’t read about).
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:22 AM
1

Unfair to fathers choice because women already have the choice and that’s the only fair outcome if a woman gets to solely decide. If a woman can opt out why shouldn’t a male be able to? It’s not unfair to taxpayers because the taxpayers are made up of both male and female one of which already has a choice. Plus, given how screwed up child support can be, many people already don’t pay it(or can’t). This leaves the baby being funded by taxpayers anyway.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:20 AM
2

I don’t even understand this. Even if it’s to bring awareness that there are homeless women on the streets, the same things that will help men will help women (other than women items which many homeless women probably still need). Is this to get women to donate or something? Even then donating because of sex isn’t right.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 09:45 PM
3

I don’t understand what calling in to remove consent has to do with anything if he has to sign to provide it and she forged his signature. None of that should matter.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:52 AM
1

He had to leave otherwise he would have been hounded non stop about his choices like you said (ironically). People were literally bullying the man and acting worse than he ever did. Just because you choose to leave doesn’t mean you wanted to or should have. But you ARE RIGHT and it’s important to get the facts straight.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:20 PM
3

Respond with “no, happy house, happy spouse” if you ever hear that. It works for both sexes.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:53 AM
1

Her argument was that for anyone else they are allowed to date a 16 year old even if there is a power dynamic and that she doesn’t like it that teachers can’t. I think the way the laws are written that is a valid complaint. Whether or not it’s accepted by society is another story. Haha.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:17 PM
1

I know a lot of English majors, psych majors etc that are having trouble getting jobs.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:10 AM
9

Which is why I don’t understand why we don’t look solely at income with these type of scholarships for disadvantaged people. That’s the biggest reason anyone doesn’t go to college. It would fix the fact that white men below the poverty line are often overlooked.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:04 PM
1

Well at least when it comes to subjects, STEM is the most important thing since the others don’t usually get you anywhere. So if girls were disadvantaged in that they didn’t have as good scores in STEM that’s nothing to ignore.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:02 PM
1

The problem is that evidence may not come forward if someone does not know the person is accused. In cases of sexual assault and rape, someone might have better evidence. In cases of other crimes you might know their whereabouts, etc. This could no help and hurt the defendant.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:26 AM
14

Well power dynamics are a thing, but it’s still no excuse. Consensual is consensual. As an adult you know what you’re doing.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:45 PM
0

Is it really not? It is in the US I believe so I would figure that it would be there as well considering the laws are usually a lot more liberal in those ways.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 12:43 AM
1

So alimony is just so... complicated. Many of these women never worked and depended on a man. So when they leave, they have nothing. Chances are they were trophy wives of a sort and don’t have job experience either. Do I think the payments should be that high? No. But I can’t believe the court never looks at self sufficiency. That’s just dumb. If someone has a job and can live without it, that’s a different story. Also, I saw an article about how the next big thing women are going to have to dea…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:49 PM
5

If the courts are not biased? Yes. Haha. Many times they are though. That’s why we have people getting convicted without enough proof. I wouldn’t trust those same courts to prove that a person who lied is guilty since they’ve already shown a disregard for evidence and that they believe the accuser more than the accused. Not to mention it would still decrease the amount of people coming forward with true rape statements because their is a chance they would end up in jail.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:45 PM
1

The problem is the courts in the first place. Do you really trust them? I would rather require a higher standard of evidence to convict someone. Someone argued against me when I made the same suggestion as you. You could have people fail to convict and then go to jail for something the accused actually did. You could also have accidental false accusations where people really do feel fucked up but and didn’t know they were accusing the wrong person. Then they may go to jail as well. I think the b…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:25 PM
2

This is absurd. If men get turned on by a woman’s organs then they are more likely to give her attention and make her have one, which for some women takes a lot.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:14 AM
4

That’s pretty hilarious. I’ve used a (single occupancy) female restroom before. When I need to sit down it’s a lot nicer to use them. Haha. Plus the male bathroom didn’t have TP so obviously that wouldn’t work out. You’ll probably have to deal with someone eventually.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:56 AM
7

Sometimes yes. Like in this post. But with a comment like that I’m not sure you would think otherwise on posts that actually matter and are causes for concern.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:54 AM
3

Unfortunately only women have a choice in the child. I don’t really support abortion, but if we are going to have it then a man needs to be able to say they are not responsible for the child just like a woman can by having an abortion. And yes, many women actually do that because they don’t want the child and not due to any other reason. This is only fair. However, I support responsibility and safe sex as well.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:13 AM
1

That’s how I accidentally read it at first, honestly.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:08 AM
2

The first one I’ve heard and seen some evidence for. It could be that in the past this was true and not anymore. Remember that no matter what we do today, people are not going to magically receive huge raises now that things are becoming more equal so that disparity will exist for a long time. I don’t know about the second one. I would google it but it’s just as easy for you to do it as me. Haha. Plus I’m tired from work.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:29 AM
4

Some jobs that are the exact same, AND they are paid less... than SOME men. Because when you have 100 men and 3 women how can you expect the average to be the same? Or even 100 and 30 would probably give the same results. However, to be fair, I did see a study that did account for a lot of these things and still said about 90 cents to a dollar. But I think that was still influenced by the number of women doing those specific jobs, meaning higher wages for men on average.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 06:37 PM
9

This is why I'm a part of this sub. Because people out there legitimately believe things like this. I don't know how you could not understand that you're saying the same thing - just with men instead of blacks or Muslims.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:28 PM
1

I can't believe this. He's just being honest. I see his videos on YouTube and occasionally watch a bit to see what people are saying. He doesn't like Trump and just doesn't want her messing anything up.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:43 AM
5

Other than the fact that more women are likely to go into those fields. Fields like teaching are filled with women, while engineering is more men. But most of that is personal choice leading to the divide. After all, a lot of times it's not any cheaper to be an English teacher than an engineer. Definitely not just because they're women.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:59 AM
1

Hmm. Sounds interesting. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:42 PM
1

So rape culture is what? Society promotes rape due to the sexualization of everything?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:30 PM
13

As a former Boy Scout I can tell you the only reason this is happening because there truly isn't an alternative to them for girls. Sure you have venture scouts but that isn't the same. And Girl Scouts? Don't get me started. More like how to bake cookies and be a mom - no joke. Haha. I think there needs to be a new group. But at the same time, most people would probably go to the Boy Scouts and getting a co-op group going would be much harder.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:16 PM
1

I think they don't want to touch the seat since dudes pee everywhere. I'm a dude and it sucks if you have to do anything other than pee. Some people just don't care.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter