TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WideAwake28 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by WideAwake28 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There is no real statistics of harm because the studies of it's harms are literally shut down in the data collection phase. Even still, despite the medical industry trying their damnedest to preserve their number one money making surgery there are loads of harms that can be traced to circumcision. The rates aren't really known for many of these as once again any studies into them are shut down really fast and many don't present until later in life so the person affected thinks it's normal when i…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:43 AM
15

The umbilical cord falls off on its own and has no function outside of the uterus. It is only clamped and cut to prevent infection by the decaying sac of blood that was the placenta. That doesn't stop people from leaving it on though. The umbilicus also doesn't have nerve endings so doesn't harm the baby in any way shape or form. MGM on the other hand removes a functional healthy piece of tissue that does not undergo a programed cell death. And is the most highly innervated tissue on the male bo…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:56 PM
20

This sounds a bit concern trolly, but I'm going make a post anyways. Look at this site it is has tons of links to scientific articles. https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org One of the main factors in this whole thing though is that those who have tried to study the complications of circumcision are shut down and not allowed access to hospital data so they cannot get true complication rates which for any other surgery would be unacceptable. The purported benefits of which there have been hu…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:12 PM
25

That's why the accused should never be named until proven guilty and anyone that does name them publicly should face punishment.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:46 AM
114

The real issue here is that men are punished only on the word of the "victim" and zero hard evidence. Once that stops any probably false accusations can easily be punished. A lot of the women who make false accusations aren't exactly subtle about it, but activist judges ban the defense from using texts and so forth showing the woman threatening to call rape previously or having done it to others. These judges not only completely ignore innocent until proven guilty but make it almost impossible t…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:08 PM
3

At first both parents want the surgery then the crew try to convince the crew member parent that it should be the child's choice and succeed by showing him Rudolph. The parent that did have the surgery was the one that was for it, as with man men who forcibly undergo circumcision, very much in line with the psychological phenomenon reaction formation. In the end even with the trial the parent against the surgery loses and the surgery is forced on the infant, but through out the show you see that…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:43 PM
2

Games don't have the same effect largely because you are pretty inactive and your mind never getting a chance to shut off. With video games you are constantly stimulated and need to think. Many other hobbies are more about creating something rather than using something already created. Im not saying don't play video games, I play them all the time. I also grow loads of plants and they are way more a source of pride and satisfaction than video games ever will be. With video games there is no real…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:39 AM
9

We need male spaces back, that's honestly one of the biggest things. Men need male friends that they can be actual men with. This is one of the biggest problems with feminism, they have destroyed almost all male oriented spaces. Hobbies are a big thing as well. Men as a whole live to be productive, to create something larger than themselves. Honestly one of the first things I would tell men who are struggling is find a hobby they enjoy and make time to do it, and I'm not talking about video game…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:52 AM
9

Thing is, his surgery wasn't "for medical reasons". Phimosis cannot be diagnosis until puberty. Until puberty phimosis is physiologic, as the foreskin adheres to the glans until the massive influx of hormones that comes with puberty. What ever doctors told them that it was phimosis lied or didn't know what the hell they were talking about, or his parents lied to him about why it was done.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:35 AM
4

Universal basic income does not work, they tried it in Finland and it failed miserably. Where do you think the money for it comes from? It comes from the people who actually work, but where is the incentive to work when you can sit on your ass doing whatever and get paid. The system falls apart rapidly as people have to work harder for less and less of their own earned money as more people quit working to get a basic income. If you think socialism works move to Venezuela don't bring that bullshi…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:39 AM
14

For any that don't use them already, straight razors are a great way to both not give them business as well as get an exceptional shave (there is a learning curve). I used to get terrible razor burn from every single multi blade I tried finally after finding my grandfathers straight razor I decided I wanted one of my own and I have never looked back. You'll want a good shaving cream and brush as well. The initial cost is high to start, but so worth it, at least in my opinion. The actual shave ta…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:23 PM
3

I admit, I didn't read the article, but while interesting, this is not surprising and doesn't really mean much all that much, expect that the study was even less thought out than I had given it credit for. It's definitely not surprising humans have more human pathogens on them, many are not adapted to growing on dogs but are very adapted to doing so on humans. If you looked for dog specific pathogens I would bet they would find many more on the dogs for the same reason. Most people have patholog…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 09:53 AM
12

Im glad you brought up the importance of the specific microbes present. It's such an important factor. The fact is, without bacteria, humans as we are now wouldn't be able to survive. Many bacteria are necessary for proper digestion, creation of vitamin such as vitamin k (which, while available in food, is predominantly from bacteria in our gut), and many processes in the human body. An interesting fact is that humans are home to more bacteria on/inside them than of their own human cells. Only a…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:56 AM
6

I had an incredibly bad kidney infection at ten and almost needed a kidney transplant because of it but they couldn't blame it on having foreskin cause my parents had me circumcised after birth ( for which I will never forgive them). Unless you had incredibly bad phimosis the doctors probably told you you had to be circumcised due to fuck all understanding of natural male anatomy and so they could make a few thousand off the surgery. In reality for anything but preterm babies and elderly men who…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:24 AM
2

It is quite literally mutilation by definition: verb (used with object), mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing. to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts From dictionary.com the first link that popped up You don't cut off hands because you could get a hang nail and get an infection the very idea is absolutely absurd. The majority of the worlds population does not mutilate their children when they are days old for bullshit "health reasons" because there truly aren't …
/r/MensRights03/12/18 03:42 PM
18

The majority of the clitoris is internal, and just as circumcised males can still feel pleasure so can circumcised females. There are quite a few testimonials of women who have been circumcised claiming exactly what you are claiming here that they can have all the sexual pleasure they want. People also claim the same health "benefits" for female circumcision, aka hygiene. The fact of the matter is that the most sensitive part of the penis is removed with circumcision. While you can still feel so…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 03:41 PM
17

You clearly don't understand how the foreskin works. Part of the reason he can get "junk all up in his junk" is because you had a part of his penis cut off. A part which should be fused to the head until an age a child should well be able to clean themselves. Cleaning a child's penis if he has his foreskin is miles easier; all you do is wipe it, that's it. Not to mention infections, urinary tract infections are extremely rare in males, less than 1 in 100, and they are more related to having anat…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 02:37 PM
41

While the foreskin and clitoral hood are analogous structures. That's where the similarity ends. The Majority of nerve endings of the penis are within the foreskin. The three most sensitive parts of the penis are: The ridged band on the foreskin , the frenulum (part of the foreskin usually partially or entirely ablated often purposefully by the person performing the circumcision), and the inner foreskin. The head of the penis is only sensitive to pressure and pain. There is also the fact that ci…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:39 AM
8

The Constitution has freedom of religion applying only to yourself, that freedom ends where another persons begins. Your child is another person and you have no right to force your religion on them physically, you can raise them in the religion that's always been okay but to change their body irreparably is not and never will be okay unless there is serious medical need.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:54 PM
4

You should post this on r/intactivists as well.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:02 PM
0

This study is worse than useless. It has a sample size of less than 100. Not a single conclusion can be drawn from that. Not to mention there are at least 3 self citations which is a pretty big red flag in and of itself. Edit: side note I absolutely believe that it does reduce sensitivity, but this needs to be done on a large scale for any conclusions to be made. We should not use studies like this as evidence.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:48 PM
5

You are misinterpreting the use of no adverse effects. There is a difference between expected loss of sensitivity, which is not considered an adverse effect, and accidentally cutting the pudendal nerve which would be an adverse effect. Circumcision quite literally cuts off >10,000 nerves endings which are specialized and exist only in the foreskin. Not to mention they are doing this on men who were recently circumcised, which means their glans has not built up the layers of keratin that it happe…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:17 PM
6

"Pulling the plug" is only in cases where there is very little or no hope of recovery (i.e. brain death). And it is done first along wishes of the patient. Only if there is nothing dictating how they would like to be treated is it deferred to family. Circumcision isn't even near the same circumstance. Circumcision is doing harm with very little benefit that is far less than that seen with less invasive treatments for anything that goes wrong. It is against every principal of medicine to start wi…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:08 PM
5

No adverse effects and no loss of sexual satisfaction is not the same as no loss of sensitivity. That isn't even getting into the fact that men that get circumcised as adults almost all have some sort of issue, usually phimosis, which makes sex painful or very difficult. If you had pain during sex and you had the cause removed you may well have lost sensitivity but you'd be so glad to be able to have sex pain free that you wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:33 PM
7

Your rights end where another person's body begins. You have no right to surgically alter anyone without prior consent unless it is for life saving intervention, which circumcision is not.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:10 PM
4

It isn't even close to the same. For one the foreskin is more analagous to the the lips or cheeks in function as it is mucosa, so it would be more like cutting the lips off exposing your mouth to open air and letting it dry out. Which by the way is extremely bad for your mouth. Also the frenulum isn't always removed.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:05 PM
2

Have you ever seen surgery? Any surgery because as someone who has I can assure you they do indeed hack away. Watch a video of a tonsillectomy they are brutal. As is intestinal surgery.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter