TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WildYams Archive

View 2 posts and 97 comments by WildYams on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Why didn't you ask for a paternity test before you paid anything just to make sure the kid was yours? This is maybe something you should still consider, though it might be too late since you've already been paying for two years.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:55 PM
68

I agree. Men's rights should ideally be what feminism is supposed to ideally be: about finding equality for everyone. When the MRM instead devolves into what feminism also sometimes devolves into (i.e. simple sexism), it's incredibly off-putting. Equality in this case should be everyone should be able to make sandwiches, fix cars, computers, etc. Not that guys should have one job and women should have another and it's better off that everyone just stick to their pre-defined gender role. Two wron…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:58 AM
3

I don’t know what is worse, seeing men wail when they find out they have a child to own up to or seeing the men throw a dance party when they find out they are not the father. Is this really any different than the reactions women who are hoping they aren't pregnant have when they do home pregnancy tests on themselves? I hate that this article is trying to paint this whole thing as some example of how men just want to shirk responsibility. The reality is that everyone (men and women) get excited …
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:53 PM
5

I've had women refuse sex cause they're on their periods and "don't feel sexy" at that time (period sex doesn't bother me one bit). I wonder if that makes them misogynists?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:42 AM
2

Why does it have to be limited just to sports? Wouldn't any example of where men are disadvantaged in anything work?
/r/MensRights28/11/11 10:16 AM
12

girlwriteswhat repeatedly brought up the fact that women can completely opt out of all financial and parental responsibilities after a child is born by giving it away as an example that women have an opt out that men do not which has nothing to do with biology, yet you did not answer her once on that. Why is that? You responded to everything else she said, but simply glossed over this one point time and time again, saying no matter what a man should have to shoulder his share of the burden. Why …
/r/MensRights16/11/11 11:11 AM
2

I've always believed that the word "objectified" really was incorrectly used. Or maybe it was correctly used at some point or in very rare instances, but nowadays it gets thrown around in ways that don't make any sense. Do some people really think if a man is attracted to a woman and wants to have sex with her that he's somehow turned her into an object in his mind? Like she suddenly becomes more attractive when the man begins to believe she's not actually a person? Is the assumption that when a…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:18 PM
2

I agree with you completely. I totally understand the feeling of wanting to do the same thing "just to show them" but risking your job just to make a point doesn't seem worth it for something like this.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:58 PM
2

You just gotta let it go. When someone's trolling nothing makes them happier than to just keep you replying over and over and over. There's zero chance that person actually believes in what they are saying, they're just trolling you. Don't take the bait :)
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:43 PM
1

I know, I've been tempted before to just report GTChessplayer to the mods to get 'em banned since the way he/she argues is almost surely just for trolling's sake (check out my own personal trip down the trolling rabbit hole with him/her). It's no wonder that GTChessplayer has minus hundreds of karma. Clear troll.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:10 AM
8

You seem to be implying that men had some kind of head start on civilization which gave them an unfair advantage or something. Were men around for hundreds of years before women were, giving them ample time to set things up the way they wanted or something? No, men and women were always in existence throughout history together. If civilization was a race between the sexes that's been running throughout humanity's history, and for most of it (and still currently, if you ask most feminists probabl…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:51 AM
2

It's so ironic that a group of people who claims to be fighting against sexism, racism, ableism, etc uses all of those things to dismiss someone like yourself. I guess apparently it's OK to be sexist and racist and all that just so long as you're doing it for the right reasons.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:23 AM
5

Here's the original (linked in the article). Here's the list of "Psychological and Economic Abuse": Yelling, swearing, being lewd, raising your voice, using angry expressions or gestures. Criticism (name-calling, swearing, mocking, put-downs, ridicule, accusations, blaming, use of trivializing words or gestures). Pressure tactics (rushing her to make decisions, using guilt or accusations, sulking, threatening to withhold financial support, manipulating children, abusing feelings). Interrupting, …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:17 AM
2

I know you're just here to troll, but it's "in the past" not "passed."
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:49 PM
2

~trolling, trolling, trolling, keep them doggies trolling, Rawhide~
/r/MensRights22/10/11 02:54 AM
1

You've got to be trolling, right? Nobody can actually be this stupid for real.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 01:10 AM
1

Who is talking about abortion? That's your own "red herring". I'm talking about after a child is born a mother can give that child up for adoption and no longer have to raise it or pay for it. If women have the option to legally abandon their child and not be responsible for it in any way whatsoever, so should men.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:29 AM
1

What does biology have to do with anything after the child is born? Birth has already happened, but the mother can walk away from the child with no repercussions while the father can not. Once the child is born biology no longer has anything to do with this scenario. I knew you couldn't answer my question though. It's easy to tell when someone would rather just pretend that the question they don't want to answer was asked than actually admit they may be wrong about something. Keep your head buri…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 11:48 PM
2

You completely did not answer my question. I'm not talking about anything biological, I'm talking about the choice men and women can make after the child is born, thus removing biology from the equation. Why is it a woman can legally opt out of being a parent and all the financial obligations once the child is born, but a man can not similarly opt out of it at any point, either before or after the child is born? Please answer me that rather than going off on this "red herring" about how men and …
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:33 PM
6

Why is it that a woman can give birth to a child and drop it off on a hospital doorstep or give it up for adoption and can thus be absolved of all financial obligations in exchange for giving up parental rights but men can not have such a choice? Why is it that according to you (and according to the law, currently) men have to decide before sex occurs whether they want to be a parent but women can wait till after the child is born to make that decision? That's not equality.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 11:38 AM
3

Beating unarmed people on the floor with a metal rod is excessive force How did he know they weren't armed? How could he possibly know that neither one of them, for instance, was carrying a concealed firearm or something? We know now that they weren't armed, but he couldn't have known that at the time. I don't know why so many people seem to assume that all fights nowadays are civil and that all parties fighting seem to know the rules that if your opponent goes down that the fight is over and th…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 09:40 PM
2

The problem is that society really isn't most concerned with the child's welfare. If that were the case then women would not be able to simply walk away from their own genetic children and be absolved of all parental and financial responsibilities for the child, which women currently can do by turning their newborn children over to the state to raise. I fail to see how offering that option to women in any way is in the best interests of the child. In any event, since women can legally abandon th…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:25 AM
2

Men have this reaction because of things like this.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 06:57 PM
5

That's voluntary surgery by the people who undergo it. A better comparison to the man who had his dick chopped off and thrown in a garbage disposal by his wife would be if a man tied up his wife and melted/cauterized her vagina with a hot poker or an iron or something. Would any male talk show host be able to say that's "delightful" on national TV and keep their job?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 09:59 PM
2

3 weeks later... From another thread posted today, I finally found some of the relevant text I was referring to above if you want to read it for yourself. You can avoid the blog commentary at the beginning if you want and just skip down to the text clipped from the book (also ignore the highlighting, don't know what the deal is with that). Here you go.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:45 PM
1

Your male abortion idea leaves the child with the mother (unless you're willing to force her to abort or put it up for adoption) I'm definitely not suggesting that. It's her body, it's her choice. who may not have the financial wherewithal to raise it. So, what do you do then? Do you say "well, the woman made her choice, fuck it" (in which case you're leaving the child without his full right to minimal financial support)? A woman who turns her child over to the state or leaves it at a firehouse …
/r/MensRights17/06/11 09:56 PM
2

All verbiage in the linked article says he slapped his daughter. Why do you feel the need to sensationalize it by replacing the word "slap" with "hit"? Just curious.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:25 PM
5

What's most discouraging, to me, in reading all this is that if you have a zero tolerance mandatory arrest policy and then the DA's office has a no-drop case policy for all domestic violence cases they are given, what you have is a system set up in which even the most minor contact in the home will 100% be sent to trial, even if both the arresting officer and the prosecuting attorney don't think it should be. When you take the ability for the people involved to be able to make a judgment away fr…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:20 PM
1

Since you apparently didn't bother to read the only other response to my comment and my subsequent response to them, here's my response again for you: A woman who gets pregnant is under no obligation to even tell the father that she's pregnant with his child. She could simply be pregnant on her own, have the child and give it over to the state with absolutely no input from the father whatsoever. In fact if she's against having an abortion but doesn't want to risk having to make child support pay…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:11 PM
2

This is an irrelevant point. No it isn't. A woman who gets pregnant is under no obligation to even tell the father that she's pregnant with his child. She could simply be pregnant on her own, have the child and give it over to the state with absolutely no input from the father whatsoever. In fact if she's against having an abortion but doesn't want to risk having to make child support payments this would appear to be a very attractive option for her. A single woman giving her child to the state …
/r/MensRights16/06/11 02:42 PM
6

I've said this I don't know how many times here on Reddit, but abortion really has no place in this argument at all. Take that completely out of the equation when debating this and instead focus on the fact that women who give birth to children they don't want can walk away from all parental and financial obligations for the child by simply turning it over to the state. If women have the option to essentially free themselves from the burden of a child they don't want after it has been born shoul…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:46 AM
3

Honestly it's been a number of years since I read the book and I've since loaned the book to someone so I can't go look up the specifics, but it was fairly general stuff. Things like standing women up, flaking on them, not calling them after a date... stuff like that. If you want to know more, I really recommend the book. It was written with female readers in mind (I think), but I think anyone would find it fascinating.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 10:31 AM
30

One of my all time favorite books is Self-Made Man and is a book about a lesbian who explores gender differences by dressing and living as a man for 18 months and then writes about it. In it she tries to engage in some stereotypical "straight guy" stuff, and that includes trying to date women. Being a lesbian, it gives her some really remarkable insight as she already knows all about dating women as a woman, and gets to compare it to dating women as a man. Anyway, one of the things she said whic…
/r/MensRights06/06/11 07:40 PM
1

But don't you think if a woman chooses to give birth to a child she plans to raise by herself that inherent in that choice should be the understanding that she's going to pay for it (or at least the state will help out)? Tell me why you think women should have the right to opt out of raising and supporting their children but men should not. It doesn't matter whether I have children of my own or whether you or anyone else does. This is a legal matter, not an emotional one. Children pay for the mi…
/r/MensRights01/04/11 08:39 AM
1

This isn't a question of biology though. A woman could know full well who the father is and if she doesn't believe in abortion but doesn't want to raise the child, she may prefer to just not talk to the father at all to let him know he got her pregnant, simply so she can carry the baby to term and give it away when it is born. She may even be motivated to do this simply because she'd be worried he'd want to keep it, and in that case he could go after her for child support if he raised it. The si…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:28 AM
1

If I take my used couch out and leave it on the sidewalk it can become public property as well. The difference is if someone decides to take it home and use it as their couch, they can't then hit me up for money to get it repaired or resurfaced simply because I made it public property. It should be caveat emptor, just like with a used couch, but unfortunately that's not the case here. The laws need to be changed.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:19 AM
1

You're assuming the mother giving her child over to the state told the father that she was going to do so and he was OK with it, when that does not have to be true. The mother can decide on her own (as I stated above), without consulting the father to hand her child over to the state and she will not be financially responsible for the child ever again. A woman is under no obligation to tell the father of the child that she is pregnant with his child. Like I said, women can be legally absolved of…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:17 AM
3

Do you feel the same way about women who turn their newborn children over to the state to raise? Should the state say "sorry, you're gonna have to raise it yourself"? Should the government only take in such a child if they can begin billing the mother for child support? Why is it women can decide on their own to opt out of paying any child support and can just stick the state with the bill but men can't do the same thing?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 12:25 AM
9

Dave Chappelle on the death of chivalry.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 09:46 AM
2

The reason I posted that is because all too often I see discussions and debates about parental rights and the ability to opt out get fixated on abortion (women can have an abortion, why can't men have a "financial abortion", etc). But I think bringing abortion into it is a red herring and totally confuses the real issue. Forget abortion. A woman can decide on her own to opt out of raising and financially supporting a child she doesn't want after it is born. The fact that men can not also do this…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 09:09 AM
9

Right, I wasn't saying this in regard to the OP's situation specifically, more just that the OP's brother doesn't have the same option the woman he got pregnant does. She is against adoption, and that is her choice, but he does not have the same option to want to have nothing to do with the child and also not be financially responsible for it. Her choice should be her choice only. He should have his own choice to make.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:24 PM
54

I just want to remind everyone that if a woman gets pregnant and is morally opposed to abortion but does not want to be a mother to the child, she can wait until the child is born and hand it over to the state and just completely wash her hands of it and never have to pay any money at all towards the raising of the child. Men do not have the same option to simply choose on their own to opt out of raising and financially supporting a child they don't want. Men should not be forced into paying chi…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:58 PM
1

If both the man and the woman have sex while being so drunk they are both blacked out, did either one of them rape the other? Since you say no one can legally consent to sex in that state, would that mean they had both raped each other? What if a sober woman has sex with a guy who is so drunk he is blacked out at the time. Has she raped him?
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:36 AM
1

I couldn't agree more. It's definitely an annoying trend that I feel like in virtually every comment thread I read I know I'm guaranteed to have to immediately downvote and hide the top 2-3 comments and their children for being "funny" without contributing anything just so I can get to comments that are actually worth a shit.
/r/seduction28/02/11 07:05 PM
3

I think you're missing the OP's point. I took it not as the OP saying "objectification of men is wrong" or that "objectification of women doesn't happen". I took it as "for people who spend a lot of time complaining about the objectification of women, doesn't turning around and objectifying men seem hypocritical?" If you think one group is oppressed or wronged, the proper thing to do is to try to fight against it and rise above it. The wrong thing to do is to try to oppress and wrong the group y…
/r/MensRights20/02/11 10:44 PM
12

The article said there were pre-nuptials and post-nuptials in place, so this is just what the woman wants. As my mom was always fond of saying: "well, people in hell want icewater."
/r/MensRights05/02/11 10:53 PM
4

Absolutely correct. It's probably not in "the best interest of the child" for women to give up their newborns for adoption, but it's not illegal for them to do so. Only women are legally able to wash their hands of their responsibilities and financial obligations toward a child they don't want. Men are not able to do this.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 01:00 AM
8

Should single mothers who just gave birth and want to give their children up for adoption not have the right to do so? After all, they're washing their hands of the child and won't be contributing financially to the raising of the child at all. If women can opt out of the parental responsibilities and financial obligations of raising a child like this then men should be able to do the same.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:54 AM
11

To all the guys here saying "I'm glad I'm cut, what's the big deal" allow me to try to explain it. I'm cut, and I'm glad that I am because here in America it seems to be the apparently "more attractive" way for a penis to look. That said, if I woke up tomorrow and wasn't cut and everything felt exactly the same for me, I can't promise that I'd go get circumcised just for the aesthetic. And that's what this is all about: I was altered when I was born, and even if I'm happy about it now, I'm still…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 11:36 PM
4

I was surprised that a couple of the people in that panel seemed like they were unsure of whether this was the case until he said that. Are there really people who aren't sure if babies feel pain? An old practice is to spank a baby as soon as it is born so that it will cry (from the pain) and thus fill its lungs with air. Do people not think that babies develop nerves until much later in life or something?
/r/MensRights25/01/11 11:28 PM
9

If you went back to Victorian times, back when women generally wore dresses and had long hair and whatnot, would you say a woman rebelling against those constraints who intentionally cut her hair short and wore men's pants was immoral, even though she was clearly doing it to make people uncomfortable? Why flounder around with these weird definitions and parameters you're trying to come up with? How bout this: if someone's doing something that makes you uncomfortable in a situation you can't extr…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 10:20 AM
2

"Pack up your rape culture and take a hike! We're not interested in your penis!"
/r/MensRights29/12/10 10:11 AM
32

I want you to do me a favor and go re-read that link you posted, but when you read it, I'd like you to imagine it's a police officer explaining to a black man why they get hassled a lot, or that it's a TSA agent explaining to a Muslim why they get pulled out of line and searched a lot. Imagine that instead of the title of the article being "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" it was "Schrödinger’s Felon: or a black male's guide to walking down…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 10:06 AM
1

I'm sorry to hear about how bad having an abortion was, but I have heard that before, and that's why it's totally unethical to ever try to force a woman to have one if she doesn't want to on her own. I think men signing away all parental rights should work exactly like you said it should. It's the same thing if a woman gives up her child for adoption, she can't just pop back in 5 years later and say "my bad" and take the child back. If you give up all responsibilities, you give up all privileges…
/r/MensRights26/12/10 05:52 AM
3

Why shouldn't a woman be held to promises she willing made about what she was going to do with her body? Because everyone should be allowed to change their mind. I support a woman's right to choose just as much as I support everyone's right to get a divorce. You may think you might feel one way about a situation before it happens, and then find out after it does happen that you actually feel another way. It's reasonable for that to happen. I feel like it is unethical to force a woman to carry a …
/r/MensRights25/12/10 08:42 PM
12

IMO this argument always gets muddled to a great degree whenever I've seen it come up. Here's how I see it, plain and simple. A woman should be able to give birth if she's pregnant without the permission of the father. It's her body, and that's her choice. But a man should not be obligated to pay any child support to the mother, even if he promised that's what he would do if he got her pregnant. The reason I feel this way is because women can decide not to financially support their own child aft…
/r/MensRights25/12/10 12:36 PM
10

"Pull the goalie" is a fantastic euphemism. I'd never heard that before, that's classic :)
/r/MensRights10/12/10 07:30 PM
3

Well said, sir. I mean, ma'am :)
/r/MensRights10/12/10 07:26 PM
17

Tell her to work on her aim.
/r/seduction26/11/10 07:16 PM
17

Someone should go post a link to this thread over on /r/women outraged that the people of this subreddit are outraged that they're outraged that we were outraged :)
/r/MensRights13/11/10 11:55 AM
7

"Chivalry is dead. And women killed it." - Dave Chappelle
/r/MensRights10/10/10 02:19 AM
23

Sell it by having them do DNA testing on both parents just to make sure there weren't any mix-ups at the hospital with babies being switched or something. Either way, I can't imagine any man not wanting to have this done right at birth, just to make sure. If you can tell for sure whether it is your child or not, why wouldn't you want to know that?
/r/MensRights16/09/10 08:29 PM
46

At this point, considering how cheap DNA testing has become, they should just do paternity testing for every child born. Just include it along with everything else that happens during childbirth at the hospital. The bills for all that (covered by insurance) are pretty astronomical already, what's another few hundred dollars on top of it?
/r/MensRights16/09/10 06:36 PM
5

A guy being a sexist asshole is not the kind of thing we need in this subreddit. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/09/10 07:47 AM
15

Barnes is saying he's the victim too. If the police showed up at a gay couple's house and they were both fighting and sporting injuries, you know the police would either take both away or take neither away, so why is it in a hetero couple that the man is the only one taken away?
/r/MensRights09/09/10 09:37 PM
11

Agreed. IMO censorship is never the answer to anything. Let her say what she's gonna say, we can always debate it without having to have her silenced like that.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 05:28 PM
2

Once again, I still don't know why the government is involved in anything having to do with marriage at all. The government doesn't get involved in bar mitzvahs or christenings or communion or any other religious rituals, so why marriage? It just makes no sense to me: "I love you." "And I love you too." "Great, let's get the government in on this!" Marriage is a religious ritual (or at the very least is just two people publicly saying they love each other). I don't see how this should be any bus…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:03 PM
6

It's the law of supply and demand. As the supply goes up, your demand goes down. I've always thought this is why women are less interested in random sex: because it's so readily available, it holds less value for them.
/r/seduction17/08/10 09:09 PM
17

Reading that makes me think of this clip from the movie Vicky Christina Barcelona. Such incredible composure matched with such balls to be that direct. I find that clip inspirational.
/r/seduction06/08/10 09:46 AM
3

One benefit of using Google Voice for all my texting is that I never have to delete any of my old texts. They're all archived, just like my emails.
/r/MensRights28/07/10 12:50 AM
1

The two most likely reasons any guy would want to keep hooking up with any girl on the DL are 1) He's got a crush on some other girl and doesn't want to screw that up by hooking up with someone else or 2) he doesn't think the girl is that attractive and would be embarrassed if anyone knew he'd hooked up with her. If he is looking to keep this on the DL, then this will probably just be a once and done thing.
/r/seduction16/04/10 06:11 PM
1

Just throwing this out there: is this meetup at the Hostel something where it'll be just the two of you away from everyone else? If so, is there some possible reason he'd only be interested in sleeping with you if nobody else could find out about it? If you can think of a reason why he'd want any hooking up with you to be on the DL, then that could explain this "sudden change of heart." If you just want to fuck him once and move on, then maybe it doesn't matter; but if you were hoping for either…
/r/seduction16/04/10 06:00 AM
3

I find it disturbing that the double standard basically sends the message that only men enjoy sex while women do not. That's why it must be OK for an older woman to molest a boy (because the boy will enjoy it, since all men like sex), while it's wrong for an older man to molest a girl (because naturally all women hate sex, so it will be a horrible experience for her). I mean, why else would this reaction exist that the boy should be high-fived while the girl should be counseled and consoled?
/r/MensRights10/03/10 10:49 PM
2

I don't know if he's normal or tortured (both, maybe?), but his efforts are futile. We all are who we are, and we don't change into someone else just cause another person wants us to. Not permanently anyway. No matter how good the sex is, you can't be having it round the clock every day, and eventually he's gonna get annoyed by just pretending to be who she wishes he was. Instead of trying to get back into a relationship with her, he should see if she'd be up for just having a sexual-only pseudo…
/r/MensRights04/03/10 02:25 AM
2

IMO, I think the fundamental reason that guys carefully squat while women just "plop right down" is because as a guy, you need to make sure you tuck your junk in as you're sitting. If you just plop down as a guy, you risk smashing your dick or sitting on your balls or something. Women, obviously, don't have to worry about this, and as such just plop right on down. Also, I'm a guy, but I'm not as incredulous as the other guys that a woman wouldn't be in the habit of checking before sitting. We al…
/r/MensRights26/02/10 10:12 AM
12

I found that to be incredibly confusing as well. How can something that takes literally a second and almost no energy be something that bothers women that much? I can maybe understand being annoyed with it if you're a woman who lives alone and is used to always having the seat down, and then a guy uses it and leaves it up, as you won't be expecting it; but in a public restroom (such as one on an airline), wouldn't you just look before sitting down?
/r/MensRights25/02/10 07:56 PM
2

DNA testing should be done at birth to confirm that the people who think they are the parents of the child, are in fact exactly that. The article says that DNA testing can be done with extreme ease for very little money, so why not just make it part of the whole hospital visit for childbirth? After all, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Even with it not being the law for this to happen, any wise man who has a child nowadays should just go get this test done on his own anyway as so…
/r/MensRights18/02/10 08:16 AM
6

While it may not be right or fair to a child to be raised without the full support of his parents, the reality is that if one or both parents don't want to be involved, then they just aren't going to be. The debate here really is about money. IMO when a woman finds out that she is pregnant, if the father decides he does not want to be a part of the child's life (which he can do, even now), he should be able to sign something in which he waives all rights and privileges to the child in exchange f…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 09:49 PM
2

I'm getting a 404 :( *edit - The link should be: http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/this-man-was-raped/ but instead it is http://yesmeansyes.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/this-man-was-raped/
/r/MensRights03/02/10 09:14 PM
12

I hate sites like this that can't just list all 10 on one page. Every person needs their own page, really?
/r/MensRights02/01/10 05:47 AM
2

I think this is really the main reason. People just don't like to hear about how human nature really makes us all behave in the same ways when presented with the same scenarios. We all want to believe we wouldn't act the same way that we're sociologically programmed to. This extends far beyond the seduction scene too. People heard what happened with Kitty Genovese and said "I definitely would have helped if I'd been there" but the reality is that none of us probably would have. Experiments like …
/r/seduction17/12/09 09:29 PM
2

Isn't a group that's almost surely mostly male that finds the thought of a woman masturbating in public to be hot something which would typically irk feminists, and which they would claim to be misogynistic? Or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights14/12/09 09:59 AM
5

I have to agree with you on this. And yes, I see the response about how feminism is the single biggest threat to Men's Rights and all, but IMO Men's Rights doesn't have an "enemy" anymore than feminism does. There are some people who are misguided on both sides who will fight to try to either take away the rights of some people or give themselves some kind of advantage, but even though you might disagree with those people, it doesn't make their ideology "the enemy". Demonizing feminists across t…
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:51 AM
1

Except that she didn't leave everything behind. She took the kids and all of the money and then left. I'm not saying it's not possible that she wasn't afraid, but there is no indication that that is what she was thinking. In other words, if she wasn't afraid at all but instead either had had enough or was just vindictive, wouldn't she very calmly wait for her chance and then empty the bank account, grab the kids and split? You're the one assuming she's on the run. For all you know she already ha…
/r/MensRights27/10/09 12:50 AM
4

I disagree. I think it's a good assumption that any woman who would want to leave a marriage would want to take her children with her. I don't think it has anything to do with fearing for their safety.
/r/MensRights26/10/09 05:49 PM
1

I don't think Hollywood at all has contributed to violence against women; but if Kidman does, and then says that she hasn't had anything to do with it, maybe she should go back and watch Dead Calm, a movie she starred in back in 1989. In that movie she is attacked, held prisoner and essentially raped by a crazed lunatic (played by Billy Zane) while at sea alone with her husband. Now like I said, I don't think Hollywood has anything to do with contributing to violence against women, but if someon…
/r/MensRights23/10/09 12:34 AM
3

Hopefully the women will stay angry enough to join men in their outrage over the unfairness with many alimony laws so we can get some long overdue reform in that area.
/r/MensRights03/10/09 09:48 PM
1

I read your comment and my thought was that you're just telling it like it is. Whether you actually accept such gifts or not matters about as much as some guy being bitter that this is the way of the world. Girls can extract gifts & favors from many guys, and their ability to do so goes up based on their relative attractiveness (which apparently in an Anime convention is skewed from what it normally would be). Just cause some guys are bitter about this fact doesn't reflect on you, or on any woma…
/r/MensRights29/09/09 07:19 PM
0

What an incredibly weak argument. Why in the hell would a man who adopted a child go to a paternity lab to get a DNA test?! I suggest you read that quoted sentence again and pay special attention to the first part.
/r/MensRights26/09/09 02:44 AM
3

Question: Could Angle just sell the house and then buy himself another one? That's what I'd be doing.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:03 PM
7

"I'd only been sexually active for about a year and a half so this was quite an overwhelming experience." Come on, how long does one have to have been sexually active to not be so overwhelmed by a "very amorous" partner as to simply say "no"? Even a little child knows if they don't want something they'll just say "no".
/r/MensRights24/03/09 10:25 PM
1

Again, if you can't trust your best friend and life-partner with your cash, who can you trust? This is a good idea in theory, but considering how love can turn to hate and vindictiveness when some relationships sour, and considering the high rate of divorce nowadays, is it really such a smart thing for practicality's sake? After all, the business contracts aspects of being married really aren't just about what each person is entitled to while they're married, they're also about who gets what aft…
/r/MensRights05/07/08 10:46 PM
4

I can't help but think that part of the "marriage strike" men may be on is just simple economics. With the amount of debt the average person has had for the last decade plus, I think men may be less able to take that next step of being the traditional breadwinner for a family, or even just helping to support a spouse. Men may feel like they're having enough trouble supporting themselves so they may not even want to consider what would happen if they got married and had a child or two (or three).…
/r/MensRights03/07/08 05:48 PM
2

I think you missed my point. Were you and your partner truly alone and weaker right up until the day you got married, after which you emerged a stronger, more cohesive couple? Or were things pretty much the same one day later except that now you had a certificate and a new piece of jewelry? If you're already in love and living together, what does getting married change? If it is about stuff like power of attorney, who gets what in the will and tax breaks, then IMO that's more an issue with the g…
/r/MensRights03/07/08 05:11 PM
2

Even beyond the obvious negative consequences that can arise if the marriage goes sour, to me the more interesting question is what does getting married actually achieve anyway? If you're already in love and living together, what will having a big ceremony on some arbitrary day in the middle of your multi-year relationship actually change? I mean, other than giving ownership of half of your possessions to the woman, which is not something that I'd personally put in the "pro" column, what are the…
/r/MensRights02/07/08 10:55 PM
6

I'd submit that bigotry against fat people is still widely seen as "respectable".
/r/MensRights30/06/08 09:59 PM
0

This wasn't a "rape accusation" it was a woman just claiming she was attacked by a guy with a knife. Where did the submitter get "rape" from?
/r/MensRights27/06/08 07:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter