TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

William_F0ster Archive

View 6 posts and 264 comments by William_F0ster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Why can't feminists tell the difference between sexism, misogyny and Chauvinism? Because many of them would consider chauvinism and sexism to be the natural consequences of systemic misogyny. I’m summarising, but these are the feminists who consider all men to exist on the same cline from the "pathological irrational and uncontrollable hatred of females” that "is normally reserved for serial killers and rapists” to "finding women inferior to men” to "blatant discrimination of women in the workpl…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 09:03 AM
1

You reap what you sow I’ve met some bitter people in my time, but the degree to which you are evidently willing to hack off your own nose to spite your face is actually pretty unpleasant. Yes, it’s true that black men were lynched by white men, often with the justification that the black man had raped a white women. But it’s widely acknowledged that this was a miscarriage of justice - in fact, it was widely understood to be a miscarriage of justice back then as well for that matter. The politics…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 08:38 AM
3

You did? That seems to contradict your saying "Pot, meet kettle.” and "This place is a joke.” to the other fella.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 08:15 AM
6

Happy to discuss further. While I agree with you here on the points about Hunt, Hunt’s wife and Goldin’s comments (among others) - I think it’s a mischaracterisation to refer to feminism as a religion. For one thing, it’s a bit harsh on religion: there are some very intelligent and open-minded people of faith around the world, just as there are some intolerant, dogmatic and illiberal atheists. For another, I think it might be a case of confusing the militancy of certain activists with the moveme…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 08:04 AM
4

I take your point, although you do realise of course that the reason why rape, and in particular false accusations, are discussed so often on this sub is precisely because it has been weaponised by certain advocates of feminism to force through changes to the legal system that anyone - not just MRAs, but anyone - should be genuinely concerned about. In other words, when those feminist activists stop using rape as a tool to subvert the justice system then no doubt this sub will stop talking about…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:20 AM
2

This is a very well-written (apart from the consistent misspelling of Ururyar name as Aruryar) and (as far as I can tell at least) a well-researched piece as well - it’s a shame it’s somewhat long though because I think a lot of people might be tempted to skip over it. Extracts with emphasis added: Ghomeshi [whose trial was going on at the same time in the same building] was found not guilty and his trial has absolutely nothing to do with [Ururyar’s] case, but the media and extreme feminists lov…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 10:24 AM
1

It's not just false accusations either, most of the people BLM is talking about are black males. On a slightly different note, and I’m not saying this to cause controversy, but I am a little wary of the interpretation that’s been given to those figures you’ve put up for Race and Gender in the US Justice System. To give just one example, I don’t doubt the actual figure that: Black people are 6.7 x more likely to be incarcerated than whites But I don’t think that is the whole story. For instance, …
/r/MensRights06/08/16 07:16 AM
1

The point I was trying to hint at is that I find it curious that intersectional feminists - in which amongst other things race becomes a factor in claims of systemic oppression - seem nevertheless quite eager to throw black and minority men under the bus when it comes to charges of this kind. For example, when Dominic Strauss Kahn was accused of sexually assaulting a black maid in a New York Hotel there followed dozens of opinion pieces which drew attention to the racial politics e.g. here Strau…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 06:57 AM
1

That’s true, I’d forgotten about Cosby. What struck me as interesting though is the stance on race and identity politics taken by at least three of the accusers that I know of and how this squares with so-called intersectional feminism. For instance, Sulkowicz’s response to Camille Paglia’s criticism of her so-called artwork, ‘Carry that Weight’ included this line: She [Paglia] speaks as if she, a white woman, knew what was best for me, a woman of color she’s never met. I mean, here’s Sulkowicz …
/r/MensRights06/08/16 06:28 AM
5

Ignoring for the moment cases such as Brock Turner’s (found guilty), Louis Richardson’s (found innocent) and Mark Pearson’s (found innocent) … … has anyone else noticed how many of the recent high profile rape/sexual assault cases seem to have involved men who are black (e.g. Kirbige, ‘Shakir’, Clayton McDonald), or from another ethnic minority (e.g. Mustafa Ururyar, Jian Ghomeshi) or are a foreign national (e.g. Paul Nungesser)? I mean, it can’t be anything more than a coincidence as there are …
/r/MensRights05/08/16 10:25 PM
1

Yawn
/r/MensRights03/08/16 09:25 AM
5

As well as that, which really is the crucial point, OP has also ignored this part of the paper: An estimated 19 million Americans (8.2%) report that they have engaged in same-sex sexual behavior and nearly 25.6 million Americans (11%) acknowledge at least some same-sex sexual attraction. Needless to say, gay men are still men and while they’re unlikely to experience a child custody battle (or at least not under the same circumstances as hetero. men do), they are still liable to be affected by ot…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 09:22 AM
2

My bullshit detector went off the scale watching most of that.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:22 PM
1

Wow! Did not know that ...
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:15 PM
3

Probably for the best, really.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:30 PM
2

You’re kidding me, seriously?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:06 PM
18

when this happens in pursuit of an alleged rapist, it's accepted and even promoted I noticed this when, for example, the US National Organization for Women decided to award serial stalker and all-round general fruitcake, Emma Sulkowicz the 2016 Woman of Courage Award. If I remember rightly, Paul Nungesser (the accused), was cleared by the college of any wrong-doing, then cleared by NYPD of any wrong-doing as well. And yet Sulkowicz was encouraged by her professor in what was basically a campaign…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:30 PM
27

Unfortunately, I believe the girl/woman who made the accusation has already been doxxed, so that her name, face and other details are on the web already. I say unfortunately because predictably, that girl/woman will very likely now be bombarded with abuse and once that happens then the issue will change from the one that is important to Jay and Karin’s family - i.e. a thorough investigation into that original claim of sexual assault against Jay - and into one about Internet harassment of the acc…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:03 AM
1

Ohhmmm, Ohhmmm, Ohhmmm, Ohhmmm ...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 07:28 PM
1

so sarcasm aka a rhetorical question reads just like a real question. Really? Weird how you took my philanthropic explanation of what as a rhetorical question is was easily interpreted by you as a 'smartass response’. How do you know it even was a 'smartass response’ based on your criteria?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 07:24 PM
1

I don't understand the purpose of your comment. It’s known as a rhetorical question. Sorry, I didn’t realise that was such an obscure concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 07:15 PM
1

Me. I'm into weird/alternative girls. Well, I was before I got married and my wife is definitely one. And do you represent the whole of TRP? Are you even typical for TRP? That is, can you extrapolate out from your and your wife’s experience and say you represent the majority of TRP? What’s that? You’re not typical? You’re kind of an outlier? Oh well, colour me surprised why don’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 06:45 PM
2

she is waaaay off on the wrong side of the crazy hot scale] That’s the real issue as I say - even my euphemism was a bit off
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 12:02 PM
1

Really? Physically, I think she’s very attractive, personally - but that’s not really the issue. The issue is that she’s pushing a shopping cart with only three wheels, and all of those are wonky and going in opposite directions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 11:43 AM
1

this is an absolutely horrible excuse. I know what you’re trying to say, but trust me it isn’t - the frequency of usage in words is one of the key criteria that lexicographers use. You don’t include salubrious before healthy to give just one example.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 11:42 AM
1

Thanks - but even so, the question was what comes up in Google translate, not what the translation is/was. I hadn’t known мужененавистничество was the translation (so again, thanks), but even so the main point remains the same.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:52 PM
5

English / Russian: Misandry - мизандрия (basically, the English word written phonetically using the Russian alphabet) Misogyny - женоненавистничество (lit. 'woman-hatred’) English / Spanish: Misandry / Misandry Misogyny / Misoginia I’m not sure how significant this is to be honest - misandry is a very low frequency word in all languages and so it shouldn’t be all that surprising that a work-in-progress like Google translate hasn’t yet caught up to include it. Google translate isn’t a dictionary …
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:29 PM
1

It doesn’t come natural, but you know I might just do that ; - )
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 07:16 PM
1

Well, firstly you are actually mistaken to think that I think "TRP is unconcerned with LTR” as “not especially concerned with” - which is what I said - is a paraphrase for ‘not a main priority’. If TPR sees LTR as "bad/undesirable is by default” is therefore just another way of saying they are much less of a priority (albeit in quite emphatic terms)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 07:15 PM
2

Heh ; - ) So you’re the guy women warn their daughters about?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 07:10 PM
2

Good call. I haven’t watched it yet, but I have found it at least: The Great Happiness Space - Tales Of An Osaka Love Thief 1 Looks intriguing - thanks.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:02 PM
1

Gosh, I feel honoured - I shall it use it wisely and give credit where credit’s due ; - )
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:38 PM
1

C looks like she has more Cheerios in her bowl. Oh my God I’ve just found my new favourite phrase for conversation! Good job!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:27 PM
1

Yeah, maybe you’re right as I seem to be in the minority here on this one. But for instance, I used to work overseas and you’d get a lot of really hot student girls hanging around in the same kind of bars and clubs where working guys c. 25-30 would be hanging out … we’d often find them a bit fucking annoying to be honest. They always seemed really full of themselves and acted like we should be grateful to have them come over and talk to us. I remember one American guy had a trick for getting rid…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:26 PM
2

Robin Dunbar, yes - cheers for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 01:18 PM
1

Ttf
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:08 AM
3

I’m just thinking this completely off the top of my head, but I wonder if it doesn’t have something to do with psychological ideas of ‘pollution’? In evolutionary terms, people were never meant to live in kinship bands of, I think, something like 120-180 people or so, with a secondary layer of acquaintances of somewhere between 600 and 800 (I’ll have to check the exact numbers but it’s roughly that I think). Cognitively, we haven’t changed that much and yet its common for us to live in towns and…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 09:07 AM
1

Well, no, you didn't. Don’t care mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 08:51 AM
1

And then you didn't follow it with a perfectly acceptable equivalent. Um, yes I did: But don’t kid yourself that women don’t have their own - what can I call this? - methods of relieving tension that may involve interaction with an inanimate object as opposed to an animate one. You understand what that means right?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 08:36 AM
11

the person accused with Emma Sulkowicz was being emotionally manipulative and did unwanted contact That is an unproven allegation coming from her side only - bearing in mind the psychodrama she has repeatedly inflicted on Paul Nungesser, I find it a bit of a stretch to accuse him of "being emotionally manipulative and did unwanted contact”. … with Mandi Gray there was sex while drunk. I’m a little surprised you characterise it that way given that Mustafa Ururyar has actually been found guilty an…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 06:16 AM
14

Why? Emma Sulkowicz and Mandi Gray to start with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:33 AM
6

Date any girl you want so long as you never ever try to date a girl on campus. Girls you meet in Starbucks, bars, on Tinder whatever, but not anyone from your own college - ever. Oh, and also - use protection obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:27 AM
2

ROFLMAO!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:25 AM
1

My bad - I received these in two different messages in reverse order - so just ignore the snark one there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:19 AM
1

He's a tard tho lol He really is, isn’t he? I mean there’s a whole tale waiting to be told behind this bit: if you will feel offended, they will see you as a weak male and continue to [gossip] even more often. If you will report it to the HR, they won’t stop it, they’ll just do it when you’re not there
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:17 AM
1

Ive seen him with 5 different chicks who belonged to a certain subculture … How does that contradict the point I made when I said “It kind of depends on what they are looking for (i.e. a quick fuck or an actual relationship).”? … I find the idea that money is a good social lubricant quite believable. I don’t think I ever argued against that point. A man with money is a man who can make ‘magic’ happen after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:10 AM
1

So you actually don’t have any knowledge in your experience of: when harvey specter type guy in his BMW is trying to hit on a goth girl, he will have it in no time. Which is what I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 04:55 AM
1

Well first off, my first comment made it clear that all this "kind of depends on what they are looking for (i.e. a quick fuck or an actual relationship).” Well in my experience when harvey specter type guy in his BMW is trying to hit on a goth girl, he will have it in no time. How many times more than once are we taking about here? I mean I get this is your personal experience, but just how many times have you seen a Wall Street trader type guy in a BMW pull up alongside a goth chick and "have i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:56 AM
1

Thanks for the tips, I’ll check those out Completely admits all the stuff TRP says about women. You know I said this on this sub a while back, but my beef is not with some of TRPs observations about how men and women interact in terms of sexuality and relationships, but how some guys who are really into the TRP label pick up those observations and then start talking about them like they are the kind of immutable physical laws you can use to determine flow rate in fluid dynamics or whatever. Also…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:38 AM
1

I'm not as confident as you that "standard" and "morals” abound Well, they say you can tell a fellow’s character by the company he keeps ; - ))
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:31 AM
1

OK fair enough, but my point in the reply still applies: We all belong to subcultures, urban tribes, demographic groups, communities, whatever you want to call them - while a 6’2” well-proportioned man with a strong jawline etc. is going to be attractive to women across all those groups, he’s nevertheless going to be found more appealing to women from his own subculture primarily, then to subcultures that are closer to his and lastly to subcultures remote from his.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:30 AM
2

You don't think men will do any girl any time anywhere? I do No, I don’t. I mean sure don’t get me wrong there are absolutely guys out there who will fuck practically anything, but I don’t think that’s an alpha trait - some people have standards and morals, and some don’t. since its broad daylight it seems contrived It could be, but I’m not so sure - you think a guy who likes to shove his dick in tail pipes is overly worried about the time of day he does it? Besides, if that’s contrived he is on…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:21 AM
1

I'm impervious to insult so that's ok I can tell. Do your worst. Nah, I’m a decent guy really. watch Iliza Shelesinger I just did … I’m only watching this one so far - she seems OK, but not great. I reckon that Whitney Cummings is funnier personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:15 AM
2

I disagree although having said that, have you seen the Gif in the other post Q4BP Can you explain this? NSFW by u/InformalCriticism yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:07 AM
1

You should go into stand-up comedy. Really, you should. You’d be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 03:04 AM
3

Really? Because I don’t. Quite apart from that, I have not even denied that the each woman wouldn’t be equally attracted to the kind of preppy Chad type in the photo - what I’ve said is: All three might find him physically attractive, but would all three actually be equally interested in him? Maybe, but also maybe not. The point everyone apparently seems in a hurry to miss is that being ‘Alpha’ is not a status with universal appeal but is dependent on the (sub)culture(s) that male belongs to. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 02:56 AM
1

Sure they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 02:29 AM
3

How do you get to "TRP men only chase party girls”? Because of the kind of thing I hear lots of TRP guys say. TRP makes guys more broadly attractive to all of those women If you say so. Personally, I think the jury’s out on that one. Nobody wants a guy who only knows how to provide comfort and is clueless about tingles. Is that really what you think being nom-TRP means?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 11:28 PM
1

It's like OP didn't think about what he was saying at all. Heh : D Nail, hit, head etc. Actually, I think that pretty accurately sums up all TRP, but maybe that’s just me ...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 10:11 PM
6

The problem is … How could you actually tell? Men who are attracted to TRP also seem to be men who are attracted to very particular kinds of women, not just in looks, but also dress sense, personality and disposition. For instance, how many TRP guys would zero in on this woman, or this one rather than this one if they were all in a bar or a Starbucks or whatever at the same time? I mean they’re all equally attractive I’d say, but if the dress sense of the first two is anything to go by, it sugge…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:58 PM
1

Both partners should be cooperative with one another. Well, that is the ideal of course. In practice it might be somewhat more complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:37 PM
2

How can you claim equality when male sexuality comes to this … ? I like the way you seem to consider male sexuality as something common to all men and that it exists on some kind of cline ranging from vaginas on one end to tail pipes on the other. You know, as if every man is just one bad day away from slipping his length into a hot tail pipe in broad daylight in the middle of the day. … women don't do this No, women can’t do that - or at least not exactly that. But don’t kid yourself that women…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:34 PM
1

OK, fair enough … although I thought TRP weren’t especially concerned with longer term relationships as a rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:21 PM
2

Actually, there’s another study that’s fairly recent that suggests a not dissimilar conclusion: Sources of Marital Conflict in Five Cultures. For instance: Spousal kindness, which requires moderating one’s own selfish needs, may be at least as important as the other variables, and a crucial facilitator of the long-term partnership required by human parental investment (Buss, 1989b). In the U.S., many popular books advise married people on how to secure more benefits from their spouses, but it ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:20 PM
1

They basically summed "treat her like a person", "treat her as an equal", "listen to her needs”, … Are you saying it’s all one-way, M-F? Why not ""treat him/her like a person", "treat him/her as an equal", "listen to his/her needs”, …?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 09:15 PM
1

Good on ya cobbah.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 08:16 PM
1

Ford is an absolutely frightful bigot, but that’s a joke - it’s even quite a funny one too.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:53 PM
2

Well, like I said I think some of his counterclaims struck me as a bit thin. I’d also found that Camden News Article earlier too, but assumed it was a bit of a subtle hit piece on him e.g. Mr Martin, who describes himself as a feminist, said “hard” chairs in the library were uncomfortable for men and that a “male blaming culture” was evident in course materials, which “ignored men’s issues” and focused on wrongs done by them. What on Earth have the library chairs got to do with this comment on t…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:52 PM
1

Given that individual muslims can be pacifists and individual christians can go to holy wars, despite their own scriptures being at odds with that, yes. But that fact can be a bit of a red herring. I’m afraid I have to disagree here quite strongly. You appear to have interpreted my comments as a “not all” argument, but that was not at all what I meant to convey in the previous message. Your argument, I believe, is that the Koran has "a significant amount of holy texts and teachings preaching ...…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:40 PM
6

I was surprised at how reasonable the tone of that was compared to e.g. Jolyon Jenkins’ Out of the Ordinary: The Red Pill which was delivered with sneering contempt throughout. But this bit caught my eye: Tom Martin gained attention last year [i.e. 2011] after suing the London School of Economics' gender studies department for sexism. I’d never heard of this story before, so if anyone else is interested, there are some links below: Let's get this straight. Gender studies isn't about 'women good,…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 08:07 AM
3

I have to be honest and say I generally don’t really care. They’re fictional characters and if someone thinks they can give it a fresh new angle, good luck to them. Besides, if I suspect the film is a stinker, then I’m just not going to go and watch it. If they see their box office receipts falling, that’ll teach them soon enough that it’s a non-starter. Likewise, if they actually keep making their money back off this kind of thing … well then obviously there’s an audience for this out there.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:48 PM
8

Fucking hell! A woman who falsely claimed she had been raped "put on an Oscar winning performance" during an emergency 999 call to police , a court heard. She made the calls in order for Irish police to give a lift back to her home in Shannon from Sixmilebridge - five miles away. In response to the 999 call for the ambulance, two mobile patrol units along with an ambulance arrived at Ms Dowie’s boyfriend’s home, the Irish Mirror reports . However, Ms Dowie told the ambulance crew that she didn’t…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:44 PM
1

I actually had to think about that one for a moment. Reminds me of this: “I took the wife on holiday to the Caribbean.” “Jamaica?” “No, no, she wanted to go too."
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:45 PM
1

I’ve calmed down somewhat from my earlier rant, but at the bottom of this I think there is a real cause for complaint at what is a blatant double-standard. This writer and Bindel in her Daily Mail article are both essentially painting women as childlike naifs being exploited by the male prostitutes that they are paying for sex - it simply beggar’s belief. The reverse of this - a rose-tinted and sympathetic depiction of a make sex tourist in his 50s sharing his bed with a Thai or a Cuban woman in…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 03:16 PM
12

Now her devastated family are seeking answers from the girl who accused Jay of raping her, and want to hear the girl's mother's side of the story as well. 'She accused him of rape and said he was a sexual offender. He was absolutely distraught. Two weeks later she said she withdrew the allegations. Jesus and all the angels fucking wept, that is fucking heinous ...
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:38 PM
1

There is a more or less inherent and unchangeable component of Islam (the Jihad, persecution of infidels and other, etc.) that directly links to terrorism and such. I know this is off-topic for this sub, but I’m not sure I can agree with that. All religions are inherently malleable and change their emphases on what is important according to their time, place, local influences and so on. In that sense, I don’t think there is anything fundamentally more violent about passages in the Koran than the…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:27 AM
2

No doubt author has been rejected by men … Sheila Jeffreys is one of the original radical lesbian separatists who set up a women only commune in Leeds (UK) in the 1970s and hoped to create a country or continent one day that would consist only of women.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:28 AM
2

GASP! Is that a hint of sarcasm I detect there?
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:23 AM
2

It’s probably too late for me to make this point - merely posting on this sub will get me labelled an oppressive misogynist shitlord who wants all women to live in a 1950s style kitchen making endless ‘sammiches’ - but I do want to stress that I do actually have some sympathy with the dilemma some women have. What I mean is, a woman can go back with a man with the idea of some physical contact up to and including sex, but at some point if it ‘feels’ wrong or he’s too aggressive or just whatever,…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:15 AM
11

Oh, this is just too fucking much now! Just look at the rank hypocrisy of this: Romance tourism That’s right - when women buy sex from third world men, it’s not sex tourism, but romance tourism - are they fucking shitting me? This is actually making my fucking piss boil. Romance tourism is a term that some scholars have used to highlight the romantic, emotional, and intimate connections culti- vated between foreign tourists and local men and women in tourist destinations (which are usually in de…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:01 AM
9

Yes, you have to love that line from Jeffreys, above, in which she states that sex tourism: It offers white men the advantage of being able to purchase sexual fantasies of otherness and the notion that there are women elsewhere who are desperate for their touch. As if non-white men aren’t as likely to be involved in sex tourism and the sex trade, let alone women (of any colour). Here’s Julie Bindel of all people writing in the Daily Mail: They are called ‘bumsters’ in Gambia, ‘Rastitutes’ or ‘be…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:52 AM
2

This is what rape advocates don't understand. I’ve also noticed that the implication whenever you hear someone spit out the (mythical) objection ‘But what was she wearing?’ etc. that it is ignorant, brutish and insensitive men making such comments. This completely ignores what most women understand - that the norm is for men to feel they should help a woman in distress and be inclined to believe a woman making such an accusation because it prompts their protective instincts. Women, on the other …
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:38 AM
3

NSW Magistrate William Pierce … And the online petition calling for Pierce’s removal from his post happening in 5, 4, 3, 2, … Ms Brierly-Newtown [the ‘victim’] denied she encouraged others to troll Alchin in return. Thereby hangs a tale as well.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 06:23 AM
2

As a side note, the top comment under that article on Helen Reece says this: Having served on a jury in a rape trial, I can vouch for how difficult it can be: it was one person's word against another. And we were told that the suspect was facing a life sentence. Both had been drinking. And the accuser's version was factually inconsistent. The female jurors were much harsher against the accuser than the male jurors, and refused to believe her on the key issue if she was not 100% truthful about ev…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 06:17 AM
1

In film, TV, adverts, online, gaming etc, feminists who pretty clearly have genuine mental issues are acting like Joan of Arc and telling everyone how their visions prove facts that say men are evil and to blame for everything. I would sincerely love to disagree with this … but I find I just can’t. It’s a serious mainstay of their movement that insanity is not only justified but almost endorsed in terms of a badge of honour. Getting diagnosed with a mental health issue such as depression is seen…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 08:56 PM
1

Why do we even care what a feminist rag like this thinks? It’s a fair comment. But on the other hand, I’d recommend watching some of the highlights from the Democratic National Convention this week and considering what role something like that article plays in the political life of mostly Western nations. And furthermore, I’d look at the Toronto Judge’s closing speech in the Mandi Gray and Mustafa Ururyar case that closed with his conviction this week, and think again.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:17 PM
4

I had no idea she’d been arguing this kind of thing for so long!
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:24 PM
2

There is a key difference and one feminists with their ideas of rape culture and similar are prone to try to conceal: Men who commit acts of terrorism, mass murder and similar are a minority. Actually, I think what they are doing is a good deal worse than merely concealing the fact that such attacks are statistical outliers. Feminists of the kind that wrote this article consider themselves to be true outliers of society - rebels and freedom fighters living a hand-to-mouth existence on the margin…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:54 AM
1

Well, if past elections are anything to go by then yes, it will be women’s votes that will likely tip the election one way or the other. But she seems to assume that all women will naturally vote HRC on the basis of … what exactly? It’s hubristic and it's exactly the same kind of hubris which the Remain campaign in UK’s Referendum displayed - before losing.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 12:38 PM
1

I just think it’s incredible that a set of descriptors that have been produced specifically to deal with men who have perpetrated domestic violence and abuse on a partner can be so casually applied to a political opponent … and the detail that the woman who came up with the idea had lived with an abusive partner for 12 years and on those grounds she is therefore qualified to ‘understand’ Owen Smith … what the hell??
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:59 PM
2

I’m no legal expert in my own country let alone Canada, but when that movie trailer says that the victim is a witness and the case is actually being prosecuted by the Crown against the defendant - Well … yeah … isn’t that the same with all criminal prosecutions? I mean, I don’t get it, what’s their point? What are they trying to say? That they want it be more like a libel case or what? How would that make any difference? And what’s this about: Every bit of evidence in your rape kit gets disclose…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:56 PM
1

Thanks for this - It’ll be interesting to see that.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:22 AM
1

As I mentioned to someone else ITT, I’ve only seen a few news reports and so am obviously missing a lot of information, but … even so, it sounds highly unusual to say the least. I mean, that detail of a Judge writing a summary including a section called something like ‘Now I know why the caged bird sings’ … I’m not familiar with the Canadian legal system, but that hardly sounds like the kind of thing a judge - one paid for by tax payers out of public funds - can usually indulge valuable time and…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 08:38 PM
1

Well, who knows? Yes, it’s just one relatively minor blog and even then it’s the blogger choosing to publicise one of his follower’s posts. But then you think about Overton Window, for one thing, but more importantly - just how many people, male and female, have been through or are familiar with the ‘Freedom Programme’? I mean, just click on this and see the image top left right (sorry) and bear in mind this link is arrived at through the ‘single parents’ network … (which used to offer the cours…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 06:14 PM
1

That is so messed up ...
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:47 PM
1

advocating for sexual assaults to be moved over to the civil courts That’s fucking outrageous!
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:35 PM
1

This fucking case gets dodgier every time I hear about it ...
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:34 PM
5

This caught my eye: We care about men as human doings, not as human beings. We care about him as an individual like I care about the individual parts of my car – I care about its problems only when it’s causing me problems. Or I care about prevention only when lack of prevention will cause me problems. Even when a man’s problems are affecting his ability to be a protector, we often refer to his problems from the perspective of the problems they create for a woman (he cheated on her; he got drunk…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:07 AM
11

To tell you the truth, I knew absolutely nothing about this case until I came across the link a couple of hours ago and I’m genuinely shocked. I’m also not the only one - Gray seems to have been more surprised than anyone that this has resulted in a conviction … now here comes the scary part. I will no doubt be accused of being a tin-foil hat wearer for saying this - but then again, I’m likely to be accused of that anyway just for daring to post on this subreddit so … what the hell, here goes: I…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:08 PM
1

The lesson? Spend more time at home, less at work and more time with your kids and pottering in the garden. Heh … food for thought!
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:11 PM
3

OK, thanks.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:42 AM
18

Are they from her or from a fake account set up using her name and photo? There’s more than one copyist of her, apparently.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:16 AM
4

You’re not kidding: Sue and Peter Sue was a 16 year old when she joined a firm of accountants … a couple of years later, she moved in to live with Bernard, the senior partner and 45 year-old divorcee. They stayed together until she wanted children, but he didn’t because he already had three from his previous marriage. Sue then transfers her affections to another partner in the firm, Peter and they get married. After 3 kids and 28 years of marriage, Sue packs all her bags and clears out of the fa…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:11 AM
6

I can't for the life of me understand this reaction to a simple movie reboot. When it was first announced that they were going to do this, I was absolutely with you on it. I really enjoyed Bridesmaids (a lot of the folks from that movie made this one too) and besides that I’ve seen Prospero played by a woman, Hamlet played by a black guy, Othello played by a white guy … you get the idea. It's a movie. Pick the right battles. Correction - this was about a movie. But it’s a movie that sucks - or s…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:47 PM
2

Thanks, that’s interesting. I do gym, etc. Pretty normal guy. This bit surprises [me] slightly, but only because physical activity tends to boost testosterone which in turn can increase libido - or not as in this case. Thanks for the link, I might check that out.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 07:30 PM
2

Assexuality … I have zero sexual drive. Does this affect your life in other ways, ones that might be unexpected? For instance, are you prone to put on weight or do you get no particular pleasure from rich or good-tasting foods either? What about alcohol, drugs, nicotine and so on? Do you find people you know such as colleagues and even some family members don’t quite believe it’s true? Is there anyone else in your family with a similar history?
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 12:36 PM
2

How?
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 10:13 AM
5

How often to do you watch porn?
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 10:13 AM
2

In a country with no guns, Nottingham was the gun crime capital of the UK in 2006. I guess this means they solved that problem, then?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:30 PM
1

Same old tired RP shit. The endless circle jerk. You tell me. Edit Actually, don’t I can’t be arsed with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 03:29 AM
1

Sound effect
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 03:28 AM
1

Asshole Liar: ... these people are often the most vocal and controversial because ... they draw huge crowds because the people who agree with them feel very strongly, but those "huge crowds" are still a tiny fraction of feminists in general … the billions of self-identified feminists around … there are visible trends within countries, and in the US and Europe "equality" feminism and "intersectional" feminism is clearly the majority and is still gaining in popularity ...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 05:37 PM
1

I think my logic is spot-on. It’s not. I'm not obfuscating the issue You really are - if not, why did you interject? What was the outcome you were hoping for? If you're going to impugn my motives, at least make a specific accusation. I would if I could guess what your reasons are, but I’m not a mindreader. But if I didn’t know better, the only purpose you have is to deflect anything that might sound critical of a movement or an idea that is dear to your heart. Now, I can almost sympathise with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 04:41 PM
1

Oh, I see. No, I would never have guessed it had been organised by them either.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:52 PM
1

Well, it was just a guess really (I imagine …) What’s the AVfM story? Have I missed something?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:31 PM
1

I'm not trying to distance myself from anyone … Either you’re being incredibly disingenuous or you have genuinely forgotten already that your original comment started with an interjection about the difference between the feminist voices in the media (one type of mainstream as you put it) and the somewhat optimistic number of the ‘billion’ or so normal feminists (or the other type of mainstream as you put it). You tried to draw a distinction and if there is one at all, it isn’t the one you have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 02:54 PM
1

In large movements like feminism these people are often the most vocal and controversial because that is what gets people watching and talking, and they draw huge crowds because the people who agree with them feel very strongly, but those "huge crowds" are still a tiny fraction of feminists in general. Yes, but which people does it get "watching and talking”? People either sympathetic or antagonistic to feminism and most likely both. So if people who call themselves feminists follow such people …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 01:52 PM
1

I'm looking at it through my own lens of what feminism means to me, i.e., what I believe in. I will be honest and tell you I'm no scholar of feminist thought. It is absolutely fine and commendable to have your own personal interpretation of what feminism means to you and in your life; but at the same time, can you understand why it might have been a bit confusing for me earlier when you said upthread: … I'm aware there are more radical feminists. ... I was referring to mainstream feminism which …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 01:30 PM
1

Know what you mean.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:09 PM
2

I see your lol and raise you a roflmao
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 05:09 AM
1

She was generally pretty good on the News Quiz too - she doesn’t stop being funny just because of her politics ( well, unless she’s talking about her politics)
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:07 AM
2

… lol. Lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 08:37 PM
3

I thought it was particularly European to split the bill when dating. Is that not true of England? Heh ; - ) To tell you the truth, it’s not true anywhere - you can always tell when a society thinks of some cultural practice as being particularly unusual because they assume it must be a foreign import (most people in Britain would say splitting the bill on a date is an American import for example). Yes, I'm aware there are more radical feminists. That’s not quite what I was saying though - I was…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 08:33 PM
4

I don't expect men to pay my tab or approach first. I don’t doubt you at all and I know that you and women like you are not an insignificant minority by any means. On the other hand, I assume you would agree that the greater part of women, even young women, are not really so egalitarian as yourself? I think there's a lot of cultural nuance that may play a role. I’d agree with this, but (being British) I’d cite class and education rather than regional differences (in the UK) as what makes that di…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 07:05 PM
12

I also see it as a reaction to feminism … Your comment just made me wonder whether it’s not so much a reaction to feminism but a reaction to much of feminism’s failure to take root in Anglophone cultures. What I mean by that is the repeated quote-unquote failure of the majority of women to alter their behaviours and expectations in the way men have to accommodate the new politics of gender. Do you know what I mean? So a trivial example would be that many women - not all, but I would say the grea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:52 PM
2

You’re welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 04:50 PM
2

After you wrote this? which goes against the convenient story you made for yourself For you it is sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 04:46 PM
2

The study doesn't mention the age of the participants No? Some 16% of newly remarried couples include a husband who is at least 10 years older than his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 04:41 PM
1

Lol! : D
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 04:38 PM
1

I imagine they’d planned to do something on it, but events since June 23rd have been nothing short of seismic here, even if it seems like a minor squabble where you are. We don’t even have a Prime Minister at the minute, let alone all the other shite that’s going on.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 03:29 PM
8

Two telling quotes: Quote the first: One guy was 20 minutes late to our museum date and it turned out it was actually closed so we went to Ikea for our date instead. Ikea where love goes to die! Ikea. I carried his clunky-ass light fixtures across an industrial part of town in August heat wearing skinny jeans and still let him see me naked that day. That guy deserves some kind of award - seriously, she still thinks it’s a coincidence that the museum was closed and that he just happened to need s…
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 03:14 PM
2

You forgot the fire
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 03:04 PM
1

/thread
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 03:02 PM
8

Do you see TRP as a cause of a problem or a symptom of a deeper problem? I think it’s possible to argue that it is both a cause and a symptom of a problem - at least to the extent that I understand it and I don’t claim to be hugely knowledgeable about it. Some of its insights into how men and women behave in terms of dating and relationship rituals etc. (in the Western Anglosphere at least), I actually think can be quite astute. However, the moment it becomes formalised into a personal code to l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 02:07 PM
3

If not, then please explain this: I don’t think the source you’ve provided goes anywhere near to proving what I take you to be trying to prove with it - if anything, it actually seems to confirm that the situation I outlined earlier upthread (the comment that starts "Anecdotally, I’ve noticed something similar, but with some crucial differences to what you’ve suggested”). Firstly, the research is about marriage only - therefore there’s no indication of what other relationships women may be havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 01:20 PM
3

Firstly, I’m not TRP - see flair. Secondly, even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day - so even if this is something TRP might also say it doesn’t actually make it wrong. Thirdly, the foregoing is based on experiences of people I actually know - so as made abundantly clear to the literate of the world "Anecdotally, I’ve noticed something similar …” Be sure to come back when you have something constructive to offer - otherwise this is basically one of those drive-by comments from an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:10 AM
5

Men will always want women more than women want men. It’s a point of view. I mean it’s completely erroneous, but it’s a free world. The issue for you is that men aren't really useful anymore. It's becoming a woman's world. Well, those are some words you’re going to be eating with a side order of humble pie before very long.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 10:10 PM
6

Women don't need an acronym or a movement. So you think women don’t need feminism? We are simply refusing to deal with men. You could do a lot worse than read about separatist feminists And I know women of all races, age groups, and situations who feel this way. Then clearly you don’t get out of the house much and/or you don’t have much contact with anyone outside a fairly exclusive clique. Go to the shopping mall or whatever on a busy Saturday and you’ll soon see that you’re way off base with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 10:05 PM
2

That wasn’t quite what I meant by "seem to make sense”. I’m not defending it or saying it’s valid, I’m simply saying that those concepts are internally consistent within the general theory of how society works that feminists push forward. Like, for example, I can more or less understand the logic of various approaches to Christianity without having to actually believe they are valid and mappable onto what you’ve called objective reality. Patriarchy isn't directly observable so instead they argue…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 09:59 PM
11

I see more and more women who have simply opted out of dating and marriage Anecdotally, I’ve noticed something similar, but with some crucial differences to what you’ve suggested: Firstly, they’re about 38 and over - there are no women in their 20s I know of who are doing this - it’s not even on their radar because they can’t conceive of the idea that they won’t be in a relationship when they’re older. Secondly, their problem seems to be essentially this - desirable men who are roughly their age…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 09:39 PM
1

Google it if you don’t believe me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 09:14 PM
1

I feel like we’re having different conversations. Poor men, being expected to contribute 50/50 to their marriage. What’s this got to do with anything? I’m not defending the practice I’m just pointing out some do care what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 09:06 PM
2

That's the plan for some. Oh, OK so I’m not completely wrong then. It's a forum on sexual strategy and the one you've described is a viable sexual strategy … Got it. Learn something new every day as they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 08:33 PM
1

Oh, OK I’d misunderstood that - what you’re describing there is what I thought MGTOW was about. I thought the idea of TRP was that the men play the field in their 20s and 30s while they build they’re career and then in their late 30s settle down with a wife who’s the polar opposite of the kind of ‘good time girls’ they’ve been partying with when they were younger i.e. a more traditional wife and mother type.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 08:22 PM
2

Oh, I get it now - so OP basically means polyamory? i.e. "Polyamory is the practice of, or desire for, intimate relationships where individuals may have more than one partner, with the knowledge and consent of all partners.” In that case, no, average guys (‘Betas’ if you like) have absolutely diddly-fucking-squat to gain from that kind of relationship. In fact, it’s actually taking their humiliation, rubbing it right in their face and telling them it’s actually beneficial to them. No, that’s fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 08:18 PM
1

Really? I’d always thought that was a big thing for TRP people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 08:09 PM
1

Of course they are - it’s so obvious.
/r/MGTOW10/07/16 08:05 PM
1

I have no idea - but they’re actors who act for a living and get paid in hundreds of thousands or even millions. Strippers on the other hand … point is, the guy says he has to put a lot of effort in to keep looking that way and the older you get the more effort it inevitably takes to keep still rather than sliding back.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:54 PM
2

While I agree in general, ironically objectification and sexualised are two that do seem to make sense i.e. I know what they’re getting at regardless of whether I agree with it or not. But I can’t for the life of me see what those definitions have to do with OPs question ...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 06:47 PM
2

I’ve just had to Google sex positivity and it leaves me even more confused as to what you think it means. It says here that: sex positivity is simply the idea that all sex, as long as it is healthy and explicitly consensual, is a positive thing. and Sex positivity is "an attitude towards human sexuality that regards all consensual sexual activities as fundamentally healthy and pleasurable, and encourages sexual pleasure and experimentation. The sex-positive movement is a social and philosophical…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 06:08 PM
2

Why exactly did the story make you not want this type of career? Because I wouldn’t want to work nights and I wouldn’t want to work in a career that’s going to dry up as I run into my 30s. The big thing about the job for me is that you’d be attractive to women - but if you’re good looking enough to be a stripper, you’re good looking enough to pick up women without much difficulty in whatever job or profession you do. So I’d rather have a regular job where as a stunningly good-looking guy you’ll …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 06:02 PM
1

Yes - that’s Ronni Ancona. I actually quite like her - she’s a good actress and an amazing impressionist. But yes, as you say, she completely flounders when she hears that and struggles desperately to find some loophole but to no avail.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 05:52 PM
2

You’d have to listen to it really - the guy himself basically seems to be enjoying the life. He has to work nights which is hard, and of course he has to pound the gym, watch his diet and be very careful about his grooming (shaving, waxing, tanning, etc.). The money is good, or can be, but as he points out there is an obvious time limit on what he does. He has some interesting comments on women and their reaction to him - listen from about 42:40 if you’re short on time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 05:45 PM
2

I guess he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 05:34 PM
1

You should. I understand your reasons, but still I prefer not to - I’ve fallen hard for a woman who was seeing someone else before now and the results were complex to say the least. I mean I take your point - going after someone else’s husband (or someone else’s wife) is a pretty crappy thing to do but then the people doing that thing will usually find some way of justifying it to themselves (“I’m not that kind of person”, “I’d never normally dream of doing this, but ‘it just happened’” etc. etc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 05:34 PM
2

Not after listening to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 12:17 PM
1

Some people do
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 10:27 AM
2

So are you saying they are BP? They sound TRP to me - what those mail-order brides promise is a loyal housewife who’ll give them kids. That’s what I understand is what TRP wants once it’s had its run of sleeping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 08:50 AM
6

I don't believe in this 80/20 rule and it's pretty laughable. "There’s none so blind as those that cannot see” as the saying goes … I don’t mean to come across as rude, but seriously I think you can only have come to that conclusion by being oblivious to the people in your local community and how they live their life. Off the top of my head, I can think of five men straight away who were pursued - and won - by single women in their late 20s and early 30s. The fact that two of these men were marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:39 AM
15

It won in men under 30 and in people under 35/36 in general. Are you talking about hook-up culture and blaming that culture on TRP? If you are, the target is misdirected. Feminism, not TRP, is what’s created hook-up culture where a smaller pool of about 1 in 5 men are being pursued by about 4 out of 5 women who thus have to either enter into fierce inter female competition for the most desirable men or accept that she is going to be one of only a few of his sexual partners as part of the deal or…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:28 AM
1

How’s that relevant to the question? The question is what would TRP men do if women just gave up because of the impossible standards placed on them - what I’m saying is they’ve already given up and are going for mail order brides. Being fat and 40+ is kind of irrelevant to the man in those situations so long as he enough material wealth to provide for the woman he’s marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:24 AM
1

Instead of improving the way you want them to, they give up because the standards you set are impossible to reach so they don't try anymore. Haven’t Anglosphere TRP guys already given up on Western women and started marrying mail order brides from Thailand, Russia, China etc. anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:09 AM
3

The silent burning rage on Sandi Toksvig’s face is perversely pleasurable to watch.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 02:33 AM
4

From Tantaros’s book jacket blurb: Fifty years after Betty Friedan unveiled The Feminine Mystique, relations between men and women in America have never been more dysfunctional. Betty Friedan was an active Marxist who graduated from University of California, Berkeley and whose early career was spent writing for Leftist newspapers. Friedan claimed that her husband Carl was jealous of her success and used to beat her black and blue while drunk. Carl, on the other hand, said: "She operates by terro…
/r/MGTOW05/07/16 08:11 PM
2

You are high, then.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:48 PM
3

Are you high?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:35 PM
3

I burst out laughing when it got to the punchline. I’m guessing that’s not the effect they were going for.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 05:02 PM
35

She is an absolute fucking ignoramus. She is a loud-mouthed, ignorant, gobshite who told Owen Jones in this interview: I just am sick of being treated differently because I’m a woman. This from a woman with barely 3 years part-time experience as a city councillor before being catapulted into Parliament on an all-woman shortlist. I mean you literally don’t have any need to make this shit up when clowns like her are doing it for you. In the same interview, she gives the following answer as to why …
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:15 PM
8

Celebrate bossy girls. Good leaders need encouragement. That one is just fucking unbelievable. Teaching a child that their more obnoxious behaviours are going to be rewarded and not punished will - not surprisingly - make an obnoxious, bullying little monster of a girl. All very well … until she meets push back from kids who hate her for behaving that way … or until she discovers that acting like a complete c**t does not actually make you good at anything, let alone leading people.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:16 PM
2

So tempting to just ignore this - ephemeral, space filler on Buzzfeed, the kind of thing to be read and forgotten within hours. Unless a million women have shared and reflagged this or it’s getting bigged up on a site like ‘mumsnet’, it doesn’t have a lot of significance … even so ... Lead by example. Kids are like sponges; they absorb absolutely everything. So celebrate the women in your life whenever you can. There … is … just … so … much … that can be said about this total nonsense in 1. here…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:13 PM
1

I’m glad someone mentioned this - the heading in this thread had me going for a minute. It’s a political action as part of a coup - it has nothing to do with her leaving her post.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:24 PM
1

Heh. Well, there you go - it must be an Internet first!
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:07 PM
3

... many of us - myself included - wore the green, purple and white ribbons of the Suffragettes. Billy Bragg led the crowd in singing, ‘We shall overcome’, and hundreds of us then marched to ‘The Sisterhood’ – Glastonbury’s first women-only space, Christ on a bike, but am I glad I’ve never even been tempted by Glastonbury, let alone go to it. Fuck’s sake.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:53 PM
2

The mind boggles
/r/MensRights25/06/16 05:20 PM
3

But when Officer Robert Foesch arrived, Border said, he was unsympathetic to her concerns. He didn't look at her photo. He didn't try to find the man or the other woman. He responded to her fear with mockery, she felt. she felt.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:56 AM
2

By Samantha Swindler Swindler?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:54 AM
2

How channel 4 can allow this abuse of a black woman, because she is a black woman, to be aired is beyond me. Disgraceful assault, and live on air! * … he had no business trying to intimidate and talk-over that woman. * will self is a rude bully here A handful of comments on this video here, which also includes: “People were calling this debate ‘Dreda versus the Patriarchal Finger Pointer'. ‘Cos that’s what you keep doing - you keep pointing your finger at me and it feels very, very angry.'
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:52 AM
3

That is an excellent assessment, IMO.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:14 AM
8

Actually, I’m laughing but it’s no laughing matter - I’m not going to candy-coat this - you’re up the creek and not only do you not have the paddle, but she’s got it and is telling anyone that’ll listen that you tried to steal your paddle from her. I really don’t know what to say here other than you have to get clearance from your superiors to do anything about this at all - you are absolutely right and she is not just wrong, but actually arguing for something which is illegal for Christ’s sake.…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:55 AM
2

You have no idea Don’t be so sure - how do you think I know in the first place? ; - )
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:50 AM
20

Here’s you problem: My organization deals with political issues on a college campus.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:32 AM
1

You know what, maybe you’re right about all this - I think I changed my mind. I mean, as feminists hate you all anyway, what possible further harm can it cause the case for re-appraising legal issues in terms of men’s rights? As it is, they already take one look at a review of Mad Max or Ghostbusters on Return of Kings and declare publicly - to their much, much wider audiences than you have - that “This is what Men’s Rights look like”. Likewise, they already see every single Tweet sent to a femi…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:25 AM
1

I think what you're saying is dumb. Fair enough If I were a mod, I'd kick you off Why am I not surprised by this? Plus I take it you’ve already tried to get this done, have you?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:50 AM
1

Ooh, edgy!
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:24 PM
1

Because it offends your sensibilities? No because it's irrelevant dumbass - that's the reason for asking "again here - why?" I know you'd love to think that you're edgy so you can wheel out your 'Precious fee-fees" or "Feels before reals" sloganeering, but it has nothing to do with that. OP's post has nothing to do with false accusations, has no bearing on family law or court procedures over divorce and child custody, nothing to do with proposals for imposing quotas for executives of Fortune 500…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:00 PM
1

LOL who anointed you monarch? Are you trying to tell me I can't have an opinion? Where's all that commitment for freedom of expression you had a moment ago suddenly gone? Frankly, I don't care what you like or don't like. Well, you apparently do care otherwise we wouldn't be having this exchange. Also, so "Frankly," you don't care what I like or don't like, but it's a really big important issue for you to debate what some moron twinks at Jezebel think: That's what people do all the time. And it'…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:55 PM
1

Yes, it happens to be. You may not want to, but that needs explaining. First of all, no examples I note of "shaming of men" for having a preference for women with fewer past sexual partners, but more importantly: Freedom of association - being criticised for doing something is not in and of itself a curb on your freedom of association - no one can make a man prefer women who he knows have had a multitude of sexual partners, but they can - if they're retarded enough - accuse him of misogyny or wh…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:39 PM
2

Oh, darling you're breaking my heart here! Listen, I'm serious go online and look into some confidence-building courses (be wary of fringe cults, Scientology and the like though obviously) ... it really sounds like all you need. Take care now xx
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 09:30 AM
1

Regardless, it's not really related to a legal right or issue, is it? And if it's a cultural trend, give me even one example of "shaming of men who simply say I want a woman who is like myself for sex or a relationship" If that one example is from some click-bait shithole like Jezebel, then it's basically not a thing, but something one click-bait weirdo said one time.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:48 AM
1

It's not that I object to people airing "their personal grievances about their sexual frustrations" as such, but it's just - why here? There are at least two sizable subs that already exist that are designed for posts like this and where posts like this would be welcomed and appreciated - so why not put it over there? It just makes no sense to me - and it amazes me how often identical posts are made by the same users first in r/MGTOW or r/TheRedPill (where they belong) and then again here - why?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:43 AM
4

Oh boy! Of course, I don't know you in person so I can only hazard a guess based on what you have written here, but ... If no one approaches me why would they want me to approach them? Firstly, this line makes you sound as if you are very shy and bashful - now imagine I'm a guy (that you might be interested in) and I notice you in a Starbucks or a bar or wherever - before I can even consider walking over and striking up a conversation or just flat out asking for your number, I notice that you lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 07:36 AM
14

I'm sorry to hear that you feel down about this, but I'm guessing that you are open to comments and questions or else you wouldn't have posted here ... so: I can not get laid to save my life. I don't get hit on or anything. Is it possible that what you believe to be very obvious signals are simply too subtle to the men that you are attracted to and presumably would like to show an interest in you? It's just the second sentence above seems to radically change the meaning of the first: you are not…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:45 PM
2

So this has nothing to do with Men's Rights. Looks that way. Yes, feminists employ similar tactics to censor and can be called anti-free speech activists, but this video has nothing to do with that. Pretty much. It's a good reminder that you always need to check the sources for claims and even after you've done that still keep an open mind.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:20 PM
9

Here's the back story: Portuguese original here; Rough translation: Unicamp professor is interrupted and disrespected by Leftwing fascist militants By Augusto Gaidukas - 06/18/2016 It seems that the Leftist fascist militancy has finally gone too far. A student organisation to strike, the Leftwing Occupy University Movement, which is funded by unknown political parties, is putting higher education in Brazil into question. Serguei Popov, professor of mathematics at Unicamp, was stopped in the midd…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:06 PM
1

Left quite an impression, I see.
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 08:37 PM
0

How many potatoes am I holding up right now? Dude ... seriously, look at this: in a healthy society the women would compete for the four men in the class because of the scarcity of the men in the program It's a college class, not a desert island you fucking retard.
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 03:25 PM
1

... billed as an "intersectional, queer, trans and disability-inclusive space open to all people who identify as women". Described as a "revolutionary clubhouse," the venue's staff, performers, and security will all be women. Should you pay the spot a visit, you'll find live music and DJs as well as workshops on diversity. Pfuh-ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! How is that a disgrace? That's a fucking brilliant plan - anyone, literally anyone, who goes to Glastonbury Festival to take part in "workshops on d…
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 03:14 PM
1

No problem. I think you've done a heroic job of wading through all the crap I've written to you already ; - ) Thanks for your time - depressing though it is, I usually find it useful to trade ideas like this as often I'm not sure what I think about something till I write it down. Good luck with your ventures.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:13 PM
4

What the fuck is this shit now?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:51 PM
1

Because there's currently a lot of shaming of men who simply say I want a woman who is like myself for sex or a relationship Give me one example. the current societal pressure to engage in sex and relationships with women where there is a clear experience difference Where the fuck do you live? I still say you should delete this post and put it up in r/MGTOW or r/TheRedPill where it belongs. This has absolutely fuck all to do with human rights or legal issues - it barely even qualifies as a cultu…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:22 PM
2

Give at least one good reason why this is posted here and not r/MGTOW or r/TheRedPill. If you can't, I say you should delete this post.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:14 PM
1

I'm not sure that's where he's going with this. He's describing how funny it is to see the LGBT speaker laughed out of the room for raising the idea that men can be raped by other men and by women - if OP finds it funny, presumably he agrees and is therefore laughing at all you guys in this sub for being sissies for caring about this stuff? The only other thing I can imagine this shows is that contrary to popular belief, the US is not a Patriarchy, because living in a real Patriarchy looks prett…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:58 AM
1

This reminds of a line from the late Robin Williams' Live at the Met show: A woman ... would never make a weapon that kills - no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel real bad for a while ... I'm generalising obviously, but I find it amazing how often it happens that when a woman is feeling shitty and anxious about something she feels a need to find the nearest man and rather than find a solution she does something to him that will make him feel as shitty and anxious as she is. If I'm mi…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:52 AM
1

I have to say that interesting though this post is, it's not really very clear what point you are trying to make exactly.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:42 AM
11

Crystal meth Extreme narcissism Psychopathy and total disregard for self and others feelings Daddy issues Easy money Low IQ "Until my acting career takes off" Born with male brain-wiring, but a female body and not interested in trans Consequence of childhood sexual abuse or neglect Raised in children's home It's really quite a long list when you think about it ... if you think about it
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 08:37 AM
3

... it makes only logical sense for the women to pursue these scarce men You're not the sharpest tool in the shed are you son?
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 08:32 AM
1

Wow ... that's ... vivid!
/r/MGTOW22/06/16 08:31 AM
8

... and access to brothels. ROFLMAO!
/r/MGTOW21/06/16 01:54 PM
1

[2/2] try to access the perspective that all the noise about the evil of men isn't going to amount to so much Oh no, that’s not what I’m saying: that discourse is changing the whole of legal and social landscape and in ways that I don’t think are necessary or likely to be beneficial either. What I was saying is more that it’s not inevitable - that implies it’s still to come - I’m saying it’s already too late. It’s happened. It’s here and we’re living it. as the father of a boy, I find it hard to…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:08 AM
2

[1/2] Thanks, again, for indulging me in this discourse. You know, even if it’s half a pose (‘equiposeur’) I do find a bit of refinement refreshing when I’m online … it’s such a nice change from people flinging insults and snark at each other the whole time; such a waste of a rich language! (And that isn’t sarcasm by the way) your perspective, which seems to me to be a mature and informed one You're very kind, but I suspect there’s a healthy amount of muddle in there under the surface (or even o…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:23 AM
2

Thank you for reading and responding. I don’t want this to appear as if my only goal is to make you feel as defeated by all this as I do, but to really suggest that it is (I think) going to be a much more complex process than perhaps you imagine. … only a small percentage of the population identifies that way--even though nearly everyone agrees in gender equality This is true, but I think the situation is similar to the one that occurs in the UK when surveys are conducted on religious habits: ma…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 08:33 PM
2

You do, however, get me wrong in thinking that my objective is "wrecking the feminist project." Apologies - I worded that with too much emphasis before and so that was my fault. I understand completely that your real motivation is "to help men and boys” - what I was trying to get across is that by thinking and talking about strategies as you did earlier, I think you could easily lay yourself open to the charge that "your motivation is less about helping disadvantaged boys and more about biting y…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:46 PM
1

Reading between the lines, I think I'm with you on this - Youtuber TL;DR said something similar a while back and made some very good points. So many of the targets of people like Bearing and Undoomed and so on are such low hanging fruit - these are often adult men ripping to shreds the arguments of teenage girls making videos in their bedrooms or people who apparently have no job and who might well be on some kind of medication. I’ll admit I’ve seen a few and even laughed sometimes, but they’re …
/r/MGTOW20/06/16 09:18 AM
1

Yup
/r/MGTOW20/06/16 08:43 AM
1

Feminists know they are losing Losing my ass. What a crock of absolute shite. Read the conclusion to the 2015 Gotell and Dutton paper he’s talking about. They’re not afraid; they’re just putting the kind of urgency into the rhetoric that this type of paper demands in order to underscore what they claim is its significance to the research community - if they didn’t frame it in such language it would imply there’s nothing to worry about which would suggest the research wasn’t worth doing. What I s…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 04:55 PM
3

Why should I care if you're female? ... a woman tries to rob my bag or assault me like in these videos...why should I have to hold back and worry about HER safety? You shouldn’t - I mean ideally, you won’t have to hit anyone at all. But if you’re in any one of the situations you describe, I think you are entirely right to defend yourself with as much force as you can muster. Two important points: 1) The kind of skanky and/or psycho women that will actually hit you - see both stories you link to …
/r/MensRights19/06/16 04:29 PM
1

I think you might have hit the nail squarely on the head there.
/r/MGTOW19/06/16 04:11 PM
5

"[T]here is an important distinction between a party who is injured through no fault of his or her own and an injured party who willingly participated in the offense about which a complaint is made." (Id., at pp. 1046-1047.) One who is injured as a result of criminal conduct in which he willingly participated is not a typical crime victim. (Id., at p. 1047, fn. 13.) Fascinating judgment. So, picture this scenario: A 20 year-old woman is invited to a party while her boyfriend is out of state. Bef…
/r/MGTOW19/06/16 01:36 PM
6

… none of those people wound honestly want you to be great and successful Eh? You sound like you’re describing an entourage of admiring fans, not friends. I think parents and children are the only people who would be happy in your success. Very much depends on the parents. Very much depends on the kids.
/r/MGTOW19/06/16 08:26 AM
2

When I asked why the story was relevant here, you asked me to imagine "the outcry, witch-hunt and persecution if this was a white male” When I suggested that (apart from the sex work angle), this is basically no different from a male drug dealer getting busted, you answered “It isn’t.” How does your first answer not contradict your second? "evidence" of serious female crimes I don’t know who you’ve been talking to online, but the ‘serious’ crimes I usually see people talking about in this contex…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 10:25 PM
2

Woman deals drugs. Woman gets caught. Woman pleads guilty and is about to be sentenced. How is this even remotely different from a male drug dealer, white or otherwise, in the same circumstances?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 10:14 PM
5

Why is this relevant here?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 10:03 PM
3

Your frustration is palpable, and understandable. Insofar as I’ve largely stepped away from this whole arena, I’m not longer frustrated so much as resigned to the status quo: this isn’t something that can be prevented because it’s clearly happened already. A key conceit of all self-identified progressives is that they fully expect to meet pushback from reactionaries - it’s a design feature of their theory of activism. Therefore by opposing them you helpfully fill a slot that has been pre-prepare…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:35 PM
3

[2/2] And it’s not just the UK - when even the President of the United States argues the feminist perspective on the gender pay gap and the Vice President repeats almost chapter and verse the story about ‘the rule of thumb’ - although Biden fast forwards to the 1300s, the problem remains the same as the one that Christina Hoff Sommers attempted to point out when she "sent an e-mail message to the Berkeley law professor Nancy K.D. Lemon pointing out that the highly praised textbook that she edite…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:30 PM
2

[1/2] If you haven't, what is stopping you? The conversation, such as it is - or even if it ever existed at all - is broken beyond repair at this point; the ‘conversation’ is nothing but a Chinese fingertrap. Your very existence does more for advancing the cause of feminism than any number of slut walks or mattress carrying protests and so on. Time and time again, your very presence is the story that delivers the proof that: Many men's rights groups use the term as a front for misogyny while cla…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:30 PM
1

a simple lie detector test for everyone involved, from the accuser to the perpetrator would solve so many problems As well as what u/oldredder says, there’s another problem - even if lie detectors were real and did work with 100% accuracy, it wouldn’t solve anything in consent cases like the one in the video because she would still believe/claim she had been raped and he would still believe/claim it was consensual - so you would end up with two sets of results for two conflicting stories both of…
/r/MGTOW18/06/16 05:12 AM
1

Good documentary. The German guy who was in the room next door says his sleep was disturbed by Alba saying over and over again shouting “I will it.” and (Yo) lo quiero translates as both “I will it" but also as “I want it” and the programme makes quite clear that her English was limited. With two English-Spanish interpreters on hand for the police, I can’t believe that they didn’t know this and that it didn’t help the girl’s case that she was being forced into sex against her will. Then again, t…
/r/MGTOW17/06/16 03:22 PM
2

Isn’t she transgender as well?
/r/MGTOW17/06/16 02:04 PM
2

Fascinating stuff. I joined a Facebook group for academic mothers […] I was unprepared for the personal nature of the attack. ... A professor at an Ivy League university chimed in, "The photo made me want to gag as well." Insult after insult filed in, many acquiring "likes" — virtual applause — while I watched it all in real time. […] What this experience taught me is that abusive online behavior is not relegated to teenagers and anonymous internet trolls. Mean Girls can be found in a wide varie…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:42 AM
1

I took this out of the local library recently and though it was excellent - The Logic of Real Arguments by Alec Fisher
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:10 AM
1

This is only my opinion, obviously, and as stated I’m neither a feminist nor an MRA but I think I have a little knowledge and insight into the arguments of both sides and (possibly ironically given much of their arguments to the contrary) I am also aware that in this debate at least feminism very much has the upper hand in terms of acceptability to the public at large and in the mainstream media. All that said, I still personally feel you have too quick a tendency to brush their ideas aside as s…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 11:50 PM
1

[2 / 2] > To this I would point out the popular quote "Privilege is invisible to those who have it.", and the irony thereof. You can say this, but you need to argue the point more strongly and not just leave it hanging and assume the other person knows what you mean as if it were common sense. Merely saying this does not refute their arguments that women have to conform to gender roles that are formed by a patriarchal social system rather than a more diverse and pluralistic one. It may seem triv…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 07:11 PM
1

[1/2] > I thought we were shying away from imposing strict binaries … In any case, I am aware of no universal council on the establishment of ideal archetypes ... Maybe the example of the chair wasn’t very clear, but prototype theory has nothing to do with either strict binaries or ideal archetypes - it’s a field within cognitive psychology and it has a considerable body of literature and research supporting it. Another way of explaining might be to think about it in terms of hypernyms and hypon…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 07:11 PM
1

there is no feminism, but feminisms. That’s true, but I think there is still a core set of values that are far more mainstream than others. Not sure what they are, but I’m fairly sure they exist. To this I would ask: Ideal? Or equal to, theoretically? Ah, sorry - by ‘ideal’ in this case, I mean a cultural or psychological prototype. So for example, if I say the word ‘chair’ to you, I’m guessing in your mind’s eye you would think of something like this rather than this even though both can be acc…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:09 PM
1

… the cases feminism had cherry-picked involved systematic misrepresentation by over-stating the contributions of an unusual woman, understating her recognition, and then unjustifiably attributing the difference to sexism or patriarchy On balance, I would say that’s a pretty accurate summary of what many of them have done and continue to do. However (sorry!) they would in turn fall back in this case on one of several supporting theories drawn from other fields outside gender studies such as hist…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:04 PM
1

I’m not even going to pretend to know as much about this stuff as I’m guessing you do from your username … but my guess is that you’ll be forever stuck out in the frozen wastes of the social media until (ironically for you I imagine) you put the women and children first. Until divorce is framed in terms of the negative impact on daughters, granddaughters and grandmothers and until gender quotas will be considered in terms of the disadvantages for women and until mothers, daughters, wives and sis…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:34 PM
1

If biology can be separated from behaviour, a la Thatcher being … Hmm, I can see why you think that’s what the argument is, but I think "in every other sense she moulded herself to behave like a (privileged white) man” is saying something slightly different from what you appear to have understood. That was probably a consequence of summarising a complex point, but to elaborate then: the idea is that the role of Prime Minister back in 1979 was one that was expected to be performed by a man (and n…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:11 PM
1

assuming an all-dominating context of patriarchy applied I think you’re overstating what is generally meant by a patriarchy there - it doesn’t necessarily mean that women have no roles or play no part whatsoever, but that the social system through the community is organised is designed to maintain and reproduce male hegemony. I mean, I’m not saying it’s true and I’m not saying it’s false, but I’m pretty sure it’s what is meant by the term patriarchy and it’s also how they can claim that, yes, Ma…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:57 PM
1

Feminists and anti-capitalists will make things up as they go along I have seen this constantly … I’m not sure if that’s quite true - what feminists and anti-capitalists have in common is a theory that’s a ‘Theory of Everything’ so it’s not so much they make things up as they go along as they have mastered the ability to explain almost anything and everything within the terms of those theories and to do it in ways that often sounds just about plausible to any third party overhearing this. … thes…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:34 PM
2

And which Charm School did you graduate from exactly?
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:02 PM
4

What’s this shit? The Red Pill is that-a-way; MGTOW is the other
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:49 AM
4

You need to consider what the feminist rebuttal to your refutation would be which is that all of the bullet points you listed there are proof of Patriarchal domination i.e. that when women such as those in your list could only stand out and be successful in terms set down by a male-driven framework; they had to become man-like because it was a man’s world and so it’s a variation on internalised misogyny. So to to take a few examples from your list: Queen Elisabeth I didn’t personally subjugate I…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:42 AM
0

I'm like a primary source on both society's treatment of both men AND women. Some things can only really be understood deeply once they've been experienced. I understand why you (and others) would think this and there is a grain of truth to what you’re saying, but even so there is a serious issue with this conceit that you have special access to life as both a woman and as a man: 1 First off, your argument from firsthand experience reinforces the idea that men and women’s lives are so different …
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:28 AM
-1

… I pass 100% as male in every day life. And as a result, I've seen a lot of the differences in how people treat men and women. This isn’t intended to be disrespectful, but I really don’t understand why you would believe that the circumstances of your birth and then later transition as an adult makes your comments into "the differences in how people treat men and women” any more or less valid or insightful than anyone else’s. Surely anyone (cis or trans) can see perfectly well "the differences i…
/r/MensRights11/06/16 08:55 PM
17

the (female starring) Star Wars soft reboot, I enjoyed that movie too I will take Kara 'Starbuck' Thrace over Dirk Benedict any day of the week. Amen to that!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:17 PM
5

Sara Ahmed, director at the centre for feminist research at Goldsmiths, University of London You remember Goldsmith’s, don’t you? That’s the college where Bahar ‘#killallwhitemen’ Mustafa is a diversity officer - the one who made this memorable speech in her defence of that Tweet That’s also the college that was so Feminist they boycotted Kate Smurthwaite - that’s the woman in the red waistcoat here - when she tried to a show at the college there - charity gig sabotaged by opponents who booked t…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:58 PM
507

“One minute after they type that, their mom’s like ‘Get upstairs and take out the garbage!! You’re 45 years old!!” shrieks 45 year-old Melissa McCarthy. I get that this is a joke and it would be way too ‘Gender Studies’ / Anita Sarkeesian to start trying to make a mountain of what is very obviously a molehill, but at the same time … The average age for men divorcing was 45.1 years in 2013, rising from 44.7 years in 2012. People aged 40-59 are least happy and most anxious, report finds - 'Rachel …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:56 PM
43

The like:dislike ratio when I just looked a minute ago was 1,968 (up): 11,872 (down)
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:37 PM
3

You’re not seeing the obvious benefit here - all the people who think this is true ... … women-only spaces are necessary in a world that is still run by and designed to benefit mainly men ... Sisterhood seeks to provide a secret space for women to connect, network, share their stories, have fun and learn the best way to support each other in our global struggle to end oppression against women and all marginalised people, while showcasing the best and boldest female talent in the UK and beyond … …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:27 PM
2

I really do appreciate you taking the time Thank you for saying so and thank you too for being civil - discussions like this always go better when people are at least trying to be reasonable. I read ( please give me time to find the source) that MRAs were pushing to legalize rape so women would be "forced" ( cough cough) into watching what they wear and who they interact with. Although I’m in this sub right now, I’m not actually an MRA - but that sounds like such pantomime propaganda that I find…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:08 AM
2

I'm don't see the reason to jump to the fact I must be advocating for women who cry rape and somehow this is fine. OK that seems fair enough to a point, but to be fair to the other guy I don’t think the inference he made from your original comment was completely unwarranted. After all, you said: … not too sure what you guys are about. But poking around here it seems like a lot of weird female hate... a lot of "unfair" court settlements and woman unfairly crying rape. Your second example of "a lo…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:12 AM
2

As a visitor here, I don’t really have a dog in this fight either, but I can’t help noticing how your comment and question don’t seem to be very clearly related to the previous guy’s. Like you’ve said: Mmm, not sure how you came to that conclusion. Which one? The part where he asks rhetorically "Men should just be quiet when they are falsely accused?”? Or the part where he says "Times are changing”? Also, this question of yours: Are you saying real victims of rape (men and women) should be silen…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:14 PM
10

Michele Landis Dauber Biography A law professor and a sociologist, Michele Landis Dauber has written highly original historical and sociological studies focusing on … What the fuck is it with these sociology departments?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:26 PM
6

Fair point. Although they are making $75K combined ...
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:52 PM
3

You’re right - I should qualify that it’s highly unlikely she majored in STEM or business/management or law. But also in 1986, there were far fewer university graduates (in my country at least) than in 1996, 2006 and certainly again in 2016. University degrees just aren’t the value they used to be in terms of earning power for later life … unless your degree is coming out of an elite university or you are majoring in STEM or business/management or law. For everything else, pretty much, that’s fa…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:51 PM
4

Actually, to be fair, with the recession and also with the fact that so many people have a college degree these days that is at least more understandable than not.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:41 PM
7

Question: Why are these people even married in the first place? Question: What the hell is she doing with $32k salary to end up with only a $100 left after bills every month?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:14 PM
1

Sir Alec Guinness as Lieutenant Colonel Nicholson in The Bridge on the River Kwai Stanley Baker, Michael Caine and Nigel Green as, respectively, Lieutenant John Chard, Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead and Colour Sergeant Frank Bourne in Zulu Edward Fox and Anthony Hopkins as, respectively, Lt. Gen. Brian Horrocks and Lt. Col. John Frost in A Bridge too Far Tobias Mengies and Guy Henry as, respectively, Brutus and Cassius in the 'Philippi’ episode from HBO’s Rome Don Cheadle as Paul Rusesabagina in H…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:26 PM
2

A professor at Santa Monica College took a group of students on an “EcoSexual Sextravaganza” trip earlier this month, during which they “married the ocean” and were encouraged to “consummate” that marriage. That’s perfectly normal. If YOU’RE THE MAYOR OF CRAZYVILLE. Or the Roman Emperor Caligula - you know, the one that was madder than a wombat’s toenails - the on who declared war on the sea and who: … drew up a line of battle on the shore of the Ocean, arranging his ballistas and other artiller…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:34 PM
3

This is the author of that piece, Robin Tran.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:38 PM
6

Name: Janice Fiamengo Internet Handle: The Fiamengo File Reddit Profile: ? YouTube Chanel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD65wnDGuTg Alt. Contact : ?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:44 PM
4

100% is clearly too much. He was accused of saying 100%, but Hitchens didn’t say it. It’s the salad dodger in the floral print shirt and the wobbly voice that does the accusing. Just before the black girl says that the Uk is one of the most sexist countries in the world because of all the casual sexism.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:26 PM
1

Internationally, more than 200,000 aggressive tweets using the same words were sent to 80,000 people in the same period – and according to the study, more than half of the offenders were women. Well paint my bottom blue and colour me surprised - who saw that coming? / s
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:53 PM
2

Isn’t the gap supposed to be 23%? So why only 8.6%? What’s with the other 14.4%? Unless … unless … could it be that … muh, muh pay gap don’t real?!?
/r/MensRights24/05/16 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter