Windex007 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	And we wonder where their entitlement mindset came from.		Windex007	/r/MensRights	18/11/12 07:22 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	How is respecting a woman suddenly manipulation? Isn't this manipulative tactics towards a man? It's not that I don't like it, it's just that they've reduced a complex topic (interpersonal communication) into exactly two modes of communication. Walking on eggshells and saying whatever you want. It doesn't matter to me. I don't interact with this person on a daily basis. And, I do have close friends on the spectrum who have this same view. It isn't a big deal, because I know them and I understand how they see they see the world. But I also see the challenges that it presents to them, specif…	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 11:48 PM
0	How is respecting a woman suddenly manipulation? Isn't this manipulative tactics towards a man? You realize this isn't a binary state, though, right? That "walking on eggshells" and "saying whatever the fuck I want all the time" are two opposite ends of a spectrum, and most people sit somewhere in the middle... sort of a "I will think about what I say before I say it, and part of that thought is how what I am about to say is likely to affect those around me" Anyhow, the argument you're making is extremely common for people on the autism spectrum. I'm not being a dick when I say that you sh…	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 12:37 AM
-4	How is respecting a woman suddenly manipulation? Isn't this manipulative tactics towards a man? So you feel it's inappropriate to communicate how what someone is saying is making you feel? Do you often feel like you have trouble and relating to how people feel? Do you often feel like there must be cues in social situations that everyone else can read except you? Almost as uf there is this choreographed dance and you don't know the steps? PM me if that's the case.	/r/MensRights	10/08/19 02:22 PM
-10	No one should be forced by the government to get anywhere near someone else’s genitals. What are your thoughts on barbers who won't cut womens hair?	/r/PussyPassDenied	22/07/19 03:28 AM
1	The title of this article tells girls they are victims of anxiety due to the education system teaching them they are victims of oppression. Let’s make them feel more entitled to sympathy. This has literally nothing to do with: men, rights, or men's rights.	/r/MensRights	09/01/19 03:38 AM
2	May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” Man you're going to be pissed when you discover the Real Numbers.	/r/MensRights	04/01/19 03:35 PM
1	May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” But in most cases, reality is binary. Kind of, yes, but in any meaningful sense: no. In the same way that I can look at a digital image and indeed be correct that it's described as an encoded series of bits which are ABSOLUTELY binary in state, but as soon as I concede that the collection of many millions of those binary states form a larger picture. The RESOLUTION of the world we live in is so much higher than any digital image should spark something that makes you wonder if considering anythin…	/r/MensRights	03/01/19 05:33 AM
1	May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” If you claim anything else, congratulations, you are no longer a scientist. I suppose I couldn't be a Scotsman, either.	/r/MensRights	03/01/19 05:09 AM
-4	May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” Yeah you didn't read it. Objectively that isn't what she was saying. She was saying that classification mechanisms that we use in physics give undue legitimacy to binary classifiers which can bias us against other forms of classification. This is ALREADY a thing we've known for like 100 years. As I've said, this is already something that we struggle with in species classification. The new slant is that this bias might subconsciously extend into the realm of gender or race, which honestly isn't i…	/r/MensRights	23/12/18 07:09 PM
-12	May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms” Is it that you didn't read the article, or that you didn't understand it? In no way, shape, or form is this what is being proposed. And, honestly, the underlying features of her proposition aren't even hers, they're borrowed from the fields of bilology and paleontology. It's a minor twist of an old idea.	/r/MensRights	23/12/18 04:29 PM
3	Life on tutorial mode This honestly reads like the nonsense that schizophrenics compulsively write. If you know who made this, you absolutely should refer them to a medical professional.	/r/MensRights	20/12/18 05:09 AM
10	Checkmate Lesbians Hmm. That does sound like a mystery, all right. Do you have any enemies who might have something to gain by your poop not coming out?	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/18 01:48 AM
4	male feminist actively working to lower his son's sense of self worth Well, I'm all for people, regardless of gender, pushing back against "help" when it is without intrinsic merit. A man isn't automatically an authority on video games just like a women isn't automatically an authority on child care. I'm glad this dude is at least trying to teach his daughter this. It's sucky, though, to ever discourage anyone from trying to help others. I think we all must be prepared to gracefully reject help as well as gracefully accept a help refusal. That doesn't mean we shou…	/r/MensRights	26/07/18 04:39 AM
2	Huffington Post writers are chosen mostly based on their gender and race. Isn't that the definition of racism? I hear you. How about this situation: You get 50 applications for a spot, and there are 3 chinese people and frankly none of them are any good. So you expand your deadline and get another 50 applications and there are 5 chinese people in there, but they're about middle of the road. Then, you give someone the task "actively search for chinese writers looking to write columns and encourage them to apply" and then you get 20 chinese applications. Now, lets say one of those 20 new ones actually IS f…	/r/MensRights	16/03/18 03:44 AM
2	Huffington Post writers are chosen mostly based on their gender and race. Isn't that the definition of racism? I understand that a lot of this stuff can be seen as inflammatory. I think a lot of groups either intentionally or sub-consciously ride the line to bait people into lashing out with half-thought-out arguments. So you think that from her perspective, she's trying to set an example of how to use a form of affirmative action to try to curate content so that the cross section of writers is an accurate repersentation of the readership as a whole. But, you think that this comes off as charity, with he…	/r/MensRights	16/03/18 02:05 AM
2	Huffington Post writers are chosen mostly based on their gender and race. Isn't that the definition of racism? You can aim to improve a metric without it being the primary deciding factor. Like, having race as a considerable metric is arguably racist, for sure, but that doesn't necessarily make it "mostly" how they decide. I dunno. I'm just saying let's not reward sensationalism and just deal in facts and then expand a discussion based on that. "Is this racist and why/why not" is appropriate. The assertion that this is the primary determining factor isn't appropriate without some kind of supporting argum…	/r/MensRights	16/03/18 12:20 AM
46	Women treat each other worse at work then men treat women or women treat men. Super interesting leap: women who defied gender norms by being more assertive and dominant Got more incivility ...when men acted assertive and warm — in general, not considered the norm... Got more civility ...men actually get a social credit for partially deviating from their gender stereotypes, a benefit that women are not afforded... I'm interested if this is just bad journalism, or if the paper actually suggests that its the deviation from "norms", rather than actual behaviour that is the be…	/r/MensRights	24/02/18 05:19 PM
10	Women treat each other worse at work then men treat women or women treat men. But they did, though. They explicitly measured this and talked about it in the article. Did you read it?	/r/MensRights	24/02/18 05:11 PM
4	Indiana nurse loses job after saying sons of white women 'should be sacrificed' Nobody is going to disagree with you that any physical traits are encoded in our genes. Skin colour is not a social construct. Arbitrarily drawing lines and groupings based on diverse sets of physical traits and calling it "race" is a social construct, though. Redrawing "race" lines as tall/short, fat/thin, blue/non-blue eyes, bornBlind/bornSighted, hasCancer/notHasCancer are all valid genetic groupings but we don't use them for "race". There is nothing intrinsically "special" about the genes th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/11/17 09:21 PM
1	"All of my sister's professors look the same I have no idea, because the qualities that I'm looking for are not apparent in a photograph. I see the point that you're trying to make, while still being too chicken shit to say. Quit beating around the bush and just say that you don't believe that these women are capable of objectively evaluating facts when a male is accused of sexual misconduct. Then, reflect on the irony of how you're accusing these women of being sexist BECAUSE THEY ARE WOMEN.	/r/MensRights	31/08/17 02:04 AM
5	"All of my sister's professors look the same You implied that they are all unable to objectively consider a sexual misconduct trial. Don't get all "oh I never SAID..." when people push back. It just makes you sound like Littlefinger. You aren't nearly as clever as you think you are.	/r/MensRights	30/08/17 02:22 PM
10	We wouldn't want to damage her career, now would we? NHS. deal.	/r/MensRights	18/05/17 09:48 PM
4	"When it comes to health care, heterosexual males are second-tier citizens." HPV rule is more evidence that boys don’t matter Its calculated by looking at the return on investment. Obviously buying and administering 2x the vaccines isn't going to cost 30x. The point is that it's an essentially worthless endeavour because boys are being immunized by proxy. Single gender vaccinations for HPV are really really effective and cost effective. There are mountains of peer reviewed scientific data to support this. If you want to make a case against it, at least make an educated one: gay boys won't see much benefit. Even if you …	/r/MensRights	19/09/15 04:16 PM
1	Feminist lives as a Man for 18 months to try to prove "Male Privilege". Learns Women are more Privileged than Men. I think we're actually in complete agreement. This is why I started with the "you really have to dial in what your objective is" part. Yes, if you're setting out to prove something exists (which is generally considered bad science) then you design the experiment to do that. If you want to find the difference between women masquerading as men, still acting like women vs women masquerading as men but acting as men, that's a whole different thing entirely. Entirely different objective. I'm aware of…	/r/MensRights	14/08/15 09:40 PM
1	Feminist lives as a Man for 18 months to try to prove "Male Privilege". Learns Women are more Privileged than Men. That's a really interesting thought. I guess you really have to dial in what your objective is, because there is a subtle difference between "finding out what it's like to be a man" vs "finding out what it's like to be treated like a man". That being said, to be "treated like a man" (whatever that means), you probably need to be "acting like a man" (whatever that means), and the hormones would play a part there. At the same time, if you're interested in the "treated like a man" angle, it might b…	/r/MensRights	14/08/15 05:01 PM
10	Feminist lives as a Man for 18 months to try to prove "Male Privilege". Learns Women are more Privileged than Men. Sorry if I misunderstood the point you were making. It appeared to me that you were trying to de-value this exercise; I was trying to provide context that implied a level of legitimacy for this method of investigation.	/r/MensRights	13/08/15 06:59 PM
56	Feminist lives as a Man for 18 months to try to prove "Male Privilege". Learns Women are more Privileged than Men. Well... short of a time machine in which she could alter her own sex before birth, there isn't a perfect solution to the problem of how to gain meaningful perspective on life as the opposite sex. That being said, just because her approach wasn't ideal (because at the moment, the ideal solution necessitates technology that doesn't exist), doesn't mean it was worthless or "illogical". It's a tool in the field of ethnography to study culture by immersing yourself in it. Obviously it's well understo…	/r/MensRights	13/08/15 05:28 PM
2	Privileged white feminist protesting Mike Tyson shouldn't be allowed travel to Iceland I hate titles like like this so much. A bad idea is a bad idea, be it from a privileged white woman or a poor black man. How to ensure nothing ever gets better in race or gender relations... or politics: Put affiliation front and centre instead of evaluating the argument from a neutral position.	/r/MensRights	05/07/15 12:39 AM
2	"I had sex with 25 men at a party and now I'm pregnant"... but it's the men's fault In THIS case I agree that men aren't being victimized. I do understand the confusion on this point though. I'm just a dumb white boy trying to do right by as many people as I can, and this shit is confusing. Wouldn't saying "You shouldn't fuck 25 dudes at a party" be slut shaming? How do I know when it's ok to tell women when and with whom to have sex? Up until now I thought it was inappropriate to even make suggestions.	/r/MensRights	13/04/15 11:44 PM
5	Feminists doing something PRODUCTIVE? Feminists plan to march across Korean DMZ. Is there no policy on post titles? Really?	/r/MensRights	12/03/15 03:23 PM
-3	#WhoWillYouHelp Canadian campaign that villianizes ALL men. Seeing as I don't do any of those things, I'm not really sure why I should feel like this villianizes me?	/r/MensRights	07/03/15 07:22 PM
7	New dating app for the rich (ahem... rich men and attractive girls) I would love to read the emails they get from people upset they couldn't join. I'm really curious who is more butthurt, men who are told they're too poor or women who are told they're too ugly. I'm not really sure if I'd call this a men's rights issue, though. There is a nearly uncountable number of dating apps, and many of them cater to other types of people. Christians of every denomination, Mulsims of varying levels of devoutness, vegetarians, vegans, homosexuals of either gender, transgender…	/r/MensRights	06/03/15 02:17 AM
1	Feminists angry that woman in STEM field having positive work experience 77/33	/r/MensRights	10/02/15 04:48 PM
2	[Study] Men who treat women the same as they treat other men, without benevolent sexism/female privilege, are seen as overwhelmingly sexist by both men and women. Nope. It says that women have trouble discerning low BS from high HS behaviours. The study further found that ambiguity is a likely culprit, as when low BS behaviours were accompanied by an egaltarian explanation the responses came in line.	/r/MensRights	15/01/15 05:22 PM
2	Is it sexist for men under 26 to be charged more for car insurance? Mile for mile men are paying less. That is little consolation when mile for mile I am paying more, as a man, because I am a man. Or at least I was when I was <25	/r/MensRights	10/01/15 12:25 AM
1	In the UK, telling your wife she's fat is now a violent felony. Does the UK have an equivalent to "taking the fifth"?	/r/MensRights	20/12/14 04:47 PM
1	If ~95% of reported rape accusations are likely true because only ~5% are shown to be false, does that also mean that ~90% of reported rapes are likely false because only ~10% end in conviction? You're absolutely bang on. Refuting the logic of an assertion and then turning around and using the very same flawed logic to produce a persuasive counterargument is very problematic.	/r/MensRights	20/12/14 05:47 AM
1	If ~95% of reported rape accusations are likely true because only ~5% are shown to be false, does that also mean that ~90% of reported rapes are likely false because only ~10% end in conviction? You missed the point of this so hard. By about 180 degrees.	/r/MensRights	20/12/14 05:43 AM
2	UK: Women should get PAID menstrual leave every month (and men will just have to lump it), says leading doctor. Canada is considering the proposal. Honestly, I know you said that in jest... but that is probably the most believable "conspiracy theory" I've heard in years.	/r/MensRights	04/12/14 01:45 AM
3	GTA V removed from Target's Australian shelves. The reason? Not violence in general, but specifically violence against women. So mass murder by the thousands = a-okay...as long as no virtual women get killed in the crossfire? Did the opening mission in the Black Ops II campaign generate similar sentiment? I never heard about it, but when I was playing I was just like "Holy shit, I just killed a lot of black people..."	/r/MensRights	04/12/14 01:41 AM
2	The Huffington Post twitter manager thinks men rage at the thought of women making videogames. Upon not getting the clickbait outrage reaction they wanted, they quickly delete the tweet. "Better" is subjective, sure, but you could easily say "has a higher metacritic rating" or "sells more copies" or whatever. I haven't seen the study, but you could certainly do an observational study and find a correlation. Just because women tend to make better video games, it doesn't mean it's because they're women, that would be causation.	/r/MensRights	29/11/14 09:16 PM
5	I was denied my right to vote at my college because I'm male My 2 cents: You might be right about men having it worse, you might be wrong. One way or another, if you say that, it's likely that the remainder of the conversation is going to end up being a "who has it worse" pissing contest. If your concern is that men have problem and you think they should be addressed, it isn't even necessary to assert that men have it worse. You can just say that there are issues relating to men. We don't need to define our issues in contrast to other groups. Men's issues…	/r/MensRights	25/11/14 05:22 AM
12	"The femisogynists talk constantly about how women are so interested in science, technology, and engineering, but when there is a major, groundbreaking story involving those exact subjects, the only t There is no need to speculate, this literally happened.	/r/MensRights	20/11/14 05:43 AM
1	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts This is literally the argument that feminists make: When a man does something wrong, it's the man's fault. When a woman does something wrong... it's a man's fault. We've already established that this type of reasoning is bogus. It remains bogus when you switch genders.	/r/MensRights	15/10/14 12:01 AM
1	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts Common Law?	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 11:31 PM
2	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts Some things have value in and of themselves. Education is one of those things. Does that value outweigh the cost of getting it? Sometimes yes, sometimes no... but to say it's "worthless" is a hyperbole.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 06:36 PM
0	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts Ok, I'm sorry. I thought your entitlement generation-bashing was somehow on topic. I gave you the benefit of the doubt. My previous post did not berate the father. The truth of the matter is that I think he's probably right. You've boiled the issue down to the point where it only bears a passing resemblance to the scenario at hand. "His money, his choice" is so simplistic and devoid of context that it opened the door for me to demonstrate how alternate contexts (bread/water vs steak/lobster) mak…	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 06:22 PM
4	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts You're completely ignoring the fact that many men rally against the same things. Look at politicians, if men's rights were polarised perfectly against gender there would be no issues in fixing laws. One could argue that the group of people most problematic for implementing equality for men are men.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 06:16 PM
7	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts He is probably just a cash cow to both of them? You have literally no basis for that assumption. You've tossed out the 53% statistic several times. I don't think you understand how statistics work. Because 53% of marriages end in divorce doesn't mean that disagreements end in divorce 53% of the time. Secondly, 53% of all marriages probably isn't the best statistic to use, as divorce rates are a function of time spent married. After 10 years, the rate of divorce is around 20%, and after 20 years …	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 06:08 PM
1	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts You're actually kind of right... I can't say that 47% of them had that situation and dealt with it. Although, conversely, there is no evidence that this situation would result in a divorce in the 53% who became divorced. The highest cause of divorces in the US in 2004 (and maybe later, I don't know) was extra marital affairs, not daughter-college-funding. So, in a roundabout way, we can say that there is no evidence to suggest that THIS event is or is not likely to result in a divorce. What we C…	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 05:53 PM
10	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts Which is what, exactly? You're coming off as someone who has a real issue with women in general. As the top post alluded to, men's rights isn't about hating on women, or generalizing them as irrational selfish creatures. They're human beings, just like you. Men's rights is about addressing systemic societal issues regarding gender equality perpetrated by both men and women.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 05:20 PM
1	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts How does simply switching majors equate to earning it? I don't disagree with your premise, I just don't see how it applies to this situation. It sounds to me like you have an option (a reasonable opinion at that) on the ideal ways for parents to help their children develop integrity and work ethic. The post isn't about if he should pay for schooling, it's if he should pay for a major he doesn't think is a good choice. At the very least, I think it's unfair to set the expectation that he will pay…	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 05:16 PM
5	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts Yes, I do : They could live with their decisions and remain married. It's what the other 47% of people do. I could accept that it's a coin toss... or slightly worse than a coin toss. But it certainly isn't a foregone conclusion.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 05:02 PM
3	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts I really want to find out if this ends in a divorce. Everyone seems to be accepting this as a foregone conclusion.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 03:52 PM
11	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts There is literally no mention of divorce in the post. We don't know that's probably going to happen. You understand that not every disagreement ultimately ends in divorce, right? The notion that the only reason that anyone would ask advice about something is because they were concerned about divorce and alimony is actually disturbing to me. I don't want to believe that anyone could be so self-centred that the thought of soliciting the wisdom of others seems impossible to them.	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 03:46 PM
6	Wife and daughter gang up on a reasonable and logical husband and father over daughters college class choices... screw what he thinks so long as he pays the bills... I see a divorce coming if he puts you could feed your kids nothing but bread and water every day for 18 years while you eat steak and lobster every night. Just because its your money and your choice doesn't mean that people wont shape their opinions on your character based on it. "I have the right to do this" DOES NOT mean "I have the right to have everyone like me for it"	/r/MensRights	14/10/14 02:37 PM
9	In the hospital bathrooms... I was very sick and had to go to the clinic last year. My gf took me. Anyways, when the nurse was getting me hooked up to an IV she made my gf leave the room. Then she asked me if I felt safe. And I was like, what? And she told me I was safe there, and asked if my gf had ever been violent towards me. Before I could even answer she told me that men are victims of domestic violence too, that its something they take seriously, and if there was any reason whatsoever I wanted my gf to not be there th…	/r/MensRights	04/10/14 09:53 PM
-2	How the myth of Gender interchangeability almost endangered a presidency \| White House Fence Jumper Pushed Past Female Guard This is insane. If they had pushed passed a male guard would that be evidence that men aren't capable? No. What about how this is the first time in a long time anyone has made it nearly that far; usually intruders are tackled at least 1/3 of the way between the fence and the door? did the MEN who were supposed to handle that fuck up BECAUSE they were men? Of course not. And even if that were the case, how is this adressing discrimination against men? How does this advance men's rights? I know a …	/r/MensRights	01/10/14 02:40 AM
1	'DILFs Of Disneyland' Is The Happiest Place On Instagram Man, I can't find the major news outlet stories casting them in a positive light. I must be so bad at google. Its so strange because I keep finding mountains of material on the topic of sexualizing women as being distasteful. Fucking weird, you sarcastic butthole.	/r/MensRights	21/09/14 06:58 AM
4	'DILFs Of Disneyland' Is The Happiest Place On Instagram Please, make a "Milfs of" something, and let us know how it goes. Like, legitimately for science.	/r/MensRights	20/09/14 04:58 PM
1	Oxford dictionary revised their definition of 'rapist' from 'a man who commits rape' to this. Are you ok with this? The relationship between the english language and the english dictionary is bizarre. People seem to think the dictionary is prescriptive in nature. It isn't. Not for english, anyways. It is descriptive. It is a record of typical usage. If the word is typically used to describe a man, then this entry in the dictionary has described the meaning of the word of typical usage. This is a common theme in this sub. When a man does it, people call it rape. When women do it, people call it something else.…	/r/MensRights	14/09/14 05:11 PM
1	What True Feminism is by Julian Iarussi a 16 year old with the alias: snipesome Sorry. Read as "Julia".	/r/MensRights	28/08/14 10:34 PM
1	What True Feminism is by Julian Iarussi a 16 year old with the alias: snipesome Words are important, but titles are worthless. I see where you're coming from, but I still don't care. If every feminist called themselves a feminist but had this philosophy, then who cares? You're confusing discription with perscription.	/r/MensRights	28/08/14 10:32 PM
6	What True Feminism is by Julian Iarussi a 16 year old with the alias: snipesome I don't give 2 fucks what she calls herself as long as this is the philosophy she promotes. Lets bicker more about titles and labels. Fuck.	/r/MensRights	28/08/14 02:18 PM
3	TIL if your girlfriend files a police report against you, even once, you can successfully sue them for harrassment. Why is the $10K relevant? How is "bleeding someone dry" a good thing? The only important thing is that a false police report is identified as such. You don't want innocent people, male or female, having false accusations on record. You make it sound like we'd be thrilled to hear about a way to "fuck those bitches". That isn't the case at all. We just want men and women to be treated equally under the law. We don't want to take anything away from women, we just want to make sure men have all the …	/r/MensRights	22/08/14 02:21 PM
1	Women tend to be more successful than men at crowd funding, especially with technological projects, because they are disproportionately supported by female backers That I don't recall that part. Were men split up as good or bad looking as well? I'm suddenly wanting to look at it again, it was interesting one way or the other.	/r/MensRights	19/08/14 08:59 PM
3	Women tend to be more successful than men at crowd funding, especially with technological projects, because they are disproportionately supported by female backers Really? I feel like I've skimmed several studies in which female HR were less likely to hire good looking females. The theory was that they were consciously or unconsciously trying to keep sexual competitors out of their workplace. I think it was even posted in this sub.	/r/MensRights	19/08/14 02:01 PM
1	Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidence For sure, but you can be court ordered to say, provide DNA. Consider a crime where there was a picture taken that shows a clearly and uniquely deformed left hand, and the prime suspect is constantly wearing boxing gloves so nobody can tell if thats what his hand looks like. The court could order him to remove those gloves to have his hands photographed. Like I said, this guy shouldn't be charged for this at all. But since he is, this isn't an unreasonable thing for law enforcement to do with the…	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 05:56 PM
-12	Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidence That doesn't even come close to making any sense. If that were true, if I were witnessed committing a crime, I could just drape a sheet over my whole body and refuse to ever remove it again.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 04:57 PM
-13	Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidence If they were going to charge her with the crime, yes. I don't think charging minors with child porn charges from photographing themselves is the part that is crazy. I'm saying that this guy shouldn't have been charged in the first place. I don't think the girl should be charged either.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 04:55 PM
-18	Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidence Is he denying a sexted photograph of a penis is his? From a completely objective viewpoint, if he says it isn't and the prosecution says it is, then one way or another they need to sort that out, no? There is outrage to be had here, no doubt... but that is the difference in how the boy and girl are being handled. That is what is offensive.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 04:24 PM
-4	Why don't the feminists condemn the misandrists in their movement? I wish you were right about misandric MRAs being downvoted to oblivion, but you aren't. Quite the opposite. Source: /r/MensRights	/r/MensRights	25/05/14 08:07 PM
2	Why don't the feminists condemn the misandrists in their movement? On top of your spot-on answer suggesting a hypocrisy on our part, I'd like to also suggest confirmation bias plays a role here.	/r/MensRights	25/05/14 08:04 PM
1	"Thinking that feminism is about women is the first, fundamental mistake" - That sounds wrong. How reply? If a feminist takes issue with non-gender neutral terms and phrases on the grounds that they're exclusionary, I'm not sure how they could make the claim you're referring to. It depends on who you're speaking to. There isn't a feminist bible that they all must accept.	/r/MensRights	21/03/14 03:22 PM
1	Catholic hospital mergers threaten women's health, activists say ironic anecdote. you used to need a prescription for plan b where I lived. the doctors at the secular hospital refused to write one. we drove to the next town over, and the doctor at that Catholic hospital wrote us one.	/r/MensRights	01/02/14 03:40 AM
21	Heard this gem yesterday at a college. Stay safe, men! I have a feeling you already have a plan in the case of unwanted fatherhood, /u/EatsTinyBaldBabies	/r/MensRights	28/01/14 05:38 PM
2	Feminist proves that even a stopped clock is right twice a day: "When It Comes To Women There’s No Equality Gap, There’s An Ambition Gap." Goes on to dismiss "gender gap", and asks women to take responsibility for their own choices. I concede.	/r/MensRights	26/01/14 05:52 PM
3	Feminist proves that even a stopped clock is right twice a day: "When It Comes To Women There’s No Equality Gap, There’s An Ambition Gap." Goes on to dismiss "gender gap", and asks women to take responsibility for their own choices. Just had to add a dig to your title. Couldn't just celebrate this for what it was, hey? edit: changed my mind.	/r/MensRights	26/01/14 05:10 PM
4	I have started a new subreddit entitled femban. It is related, but this isn't productive at all. It's divisive and polarizing. By framing this as a war all you do is entrench positions. Where at one point it would have been seen as pragmatic for a feminist to consider our arguments, you're contributing to an environment where its seen as treason. It has nothing to do with sympathies, its just part of the necessary step of critically evaluating the outcome of your efforts. This list is worse than a waste of time.	/r/MensRights	20/12/13 05:40 AM
-1	I have started a new subreddit entitled femban. I'm not sure that's a good way to evaluate the quality of something.	/r/MensRights	20/12/13 12:17 AM
2	I have started a new subreddit entitled femban. I completely agree! The principle is great. The forums (this one, at least) are horrible.	/r/MensRights	20/12/13 12:13 AM
2	I have started a new subreddit entitled femban. I'm going to start a sub that lists all the men who've essentially abandoned men's rights after becoming disillusioned when they realized the public forums are mostly full of people hating on feminists rather than promoting men.	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 06:58 PM
1	Is it wrong that I like proving feminists wrong? Maybe. Are you serving logic and truth or serving yourself? If honest self reflection reveals that winning is more important than being unflinchingly objective, you could find yourself seduced into straying from real meaningful arguments in favour of personal attacks and anecdotal evidence. It isn't enough to be right. If you alienate somebody so that they walk away without internalizing your arguments, they won't change their mind. If you cast your relationship with the person as enemies, then …	/r/MensRights	15/12/13 11:33 PM
1	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Hey man, I'm afraid that I don't think that I can provide much direction. I'm at the tail end of my undergrad (STEM field) and so I can't speak with any authority on how specifically one would go about making this happen, especially in the field of sociology. If I were you, though, I'd start by trying to find a list of professors in the department who are taking grad students for research projects. I'd float the idea by them, and see what comes out of it. If they like it, they'll probably act as…	/r/MensRights	04/12/13 09:22 PM
2	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development That's not how making a claim, or general logic works. First of all, the onus is on you for making the claim to prove it, not on me to disprove it. Second of all, all it takes to disprove a universal statement is a single counter example, which I have provided. You made a universal statement, I have a counter example. Done, and done.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 09:25 AM
3	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development I love kids. Babies. Toddlers. When I say this, women respond positively. What I'm taking away from this is that I must be good looking.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:41 AM
4	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development You are wrong to imply that this is universally true. Maybe in your peer group your friends are really really careful to have an in depth understanding of the character of a woman, and require references before they'll drop a "crazy" label on a woman. Good on them. In many of my peer circles, this isn't the case. If a girl comes on strong and a guy isn't interested, she's "crazy". So, you can't say this isn't the case. You can say "in my peer groups it is not the case", but you can't universally…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:38 AM
1	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Very interesting take on the root of the issue. Are you aware of any scholarly research into this? I think it's relevant and meaningful. What I think you should do, is first off try and divorce yourself from the perceived "effects" of this. You're getting ahead of yourself. I think you've got a really cool opportunity to be a scientist here. I know this is /r/mensrights and passions run very high around here, but I think that a scientific approach is the correct one. I think you could probably f…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 07:31 AM
0	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. I think if his goal was to re-unite with his daughter, then this is going to make that very very difficult. The circumstances of their reunion were unfortunate, and are going to have him framed as the bad guy in the view of his daughter. This was a suboptimal outcome. A better outcome would be one where there was a greater likelihood that he would be able to form a relationship with his daughter. Maybe I've just got a soft heart, but if I had my daughter taken from me for 20 years, I would be 10…	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 08:31 PM
0	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. I read your whole piece, and I can't bring myself to write anything of considerable length in response because it's clear that you're not actually debating me. You think my point is that maybe the mother isn't in the wrong, that maybe she was right to take the kid? First of all, no, I don't think that. How you managed to glean that from what I've said is beyond me. How "This was a suboptimal outcome" turned into "The woman was right to steal the child" is nonsense. You're arguing with a person y…	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 08:25 PM
0	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. No, I don't think that.	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 07:46 PM
-5	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. Well, he lost the first 20 because of her, I think he can take credit for losing the remainder.	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 05:46 AM
-4	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. Man, cool your jets hot stuff. I'm not even going to address the bulk of your rant because it was almost entirely based on misunderstanding. Maybe the source of the misunderstanding was my brevity. Maybe the source of the misunderstanding is that you're incapable of understanding that the world exists in shades of grey, and that simply stating that something isn't optimal, doesn't automatically mean that I prescribe the polar opposite. Could be either case. I'm hoping it's the first. What does t…	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 05:44 AM
-14	A Man found his long lost daughter of 20 years, after her mother kidnapped her and moved to Australia when the girl was 11 months old...mother is denied bail and awaits extradition to the US. I hope destroying his daughters life made up for what happened to him. Its a real fucking shame how this played out. There were a lot of better resolutions. This is basically the worst.	/r/MensRights	29/11/13 10:22 PM
4	Cracked.com is just.... I just don't know where to start. This is awful. "Recommended for me: good girls gone bad!" some article with the splash image of a bunch of women in lingerie. Such the high road you take, cracked.com.	/r/MensRights	15/11/13 06:16 PM
4	Jailbreak the Patriarchy is an app that changes gender in text on websites from male to female to point out inequality (is it time to make one that does the opposite - changing female to male?) Was somebody mad?	/r/MensRights	10/11/13 11:16 PM
2	I don't think I'm going to date this girl anymore... Maybe I missed something... as far as this text goes, it looks like shes just brining it up for the first time and that there has been no discussion on the subject. In fact, I think it starts out pretty healthy. She expresses sadness that her advances were rejected. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, in a relationship you need to be able to talk about sex like an adult (what you want, what you feel, what you're happy with, what you're unhappy with). As far as I can tell, she's trying t…	/r/MensRights	01/10/13 07:11 PM
2	I don't think I'm going to date this girl anymore... it is completely unreasonable to assume she is incapable of grasping this concept. when my gf says stuff like this, I point out the double standard in a joking way. once she understands, I tell her more seriously how it is harmful. at this point, she's actively evaluating these double standards without prompting from me.	/r/MensRights	01/10/13 04:21 PM
0	About the "Women in Tech" thing it wasn't an issue because the downtrodden never made it an issue... you can't really blame anyone for that. also, where are you getting the "mostly women" from, with respect to the name calling? that sounds like baseless speculation, to me.	/r/MensRights	10/09/13 03:12 PM
6	How to respond to the charge that the MRM is a “backlash”. Calmly and respectfully.	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 03:17 PM
7	Men can't just be friends to women apparently.. you know full well what this means.	/r/MensRights	27/07/13 05:20 PM
2	I didn't know how to react when i saw this. I think enough people get anxious enough dropping a giant, loud, smelly turd in public that I don't find it hard to believe that people would at least like to ensure that their "audience" isn't comprised of potential sexual partners. I think the arguments for providing a seperation of men and women while they poop are stronger than the seperation of men and their families. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.	/r/MensRights	16/07/13 08:09 PM
1	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? "This is a worthless post" followed by an attempt at a clever analogy is pretty played out. Say what you will about my post, but yours is without a doubt in the same boat.	/r/MensRights	13/05/13 10:26 PM
0	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? A little bit ironic, no?	/r/MensRights	12/05/13 07:39 PM
10	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? Bad feminists exist, bad MRA's exist. I should have been able to lay out that premise in one sentence, but in my experience, I can't. If I don't fluff that statement with about 2 paragraphs people just start tripping balls. "you're seriously comparing MRAs to Feminists?", they say. I guess when I have to fluff it that hard, it probably looks like that's the point I'm trying to make. It isn't. I only made the point to set a context for my actual point. My actual point is that if we are going to s…	/r/MensRights	12/05/13 07:11 PM
5	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? You have misunderstood. I think the root of your misunderstanding was that you read "there exist MRA's who aren't in it for equality", and then didn't read a single other word in my post. I never said that all MRA's are bad, I never implied it, and even if I had, it would have played no part in the overall thesis of my post which was that the reaction to the article was a good litmus test to tell the good from the bad. My "opinion on the post" is that its value exceeds its content. I'm sorry tha…	/r/MensRights	12/05/13 06:46 PM
9	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? I think the major difference between the applied concept of Mens Rights vs Feminism is that Feminism in practice is the relentless pursuit of advancing female interests with only a passing interest in equity or fairness, whereas (in my view) MRAs are looking to advance gender relations to a point of equity and fairness (and no further). I think (well... I know) that there are some MRAs who aren't in it for the equity... some just want to get some kind of perverted revenge. Those people will be w…	/r/MensRights	12/05/13 06:14 PM
1	Feminists complain of being silenced by transsexual activists -- How Does It Feel? the way mra's react to this is very telling of thier individual motives.	/r/MensRights	12/05/13 05:16 PM
1	When you refuse to allow critical discussion of your points, as far as I am concerned they are invalid you're right, and I refuse to discuss the matter further.	/r/MensRights	08/05/13 01:25 PM
1	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. You can check out the article I just linked in my original comment if you're interested in a study about vaccinations against stds and herd immunity.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 11:59 PM
1	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. Do all girls get free vaccinations in the states? (Maybe a stupid question). If they don't, then I'd certainly be going out of pocket to have my sons vaccinated.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 11:56 PM
1	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. not subsidizing lesbian women would create 2 groups that didn't benifit, rather than addressing the one that already exists... if I'm understanding your suggestion correctly. I'm not in favour of increasing the number of groups and people who won't benefit from the scheme... so no, I would not be in favour of that... unless I'm missing something. Also, the nature of the math I did was tracing the most serious issues back to the source of HPV instead of going the opposite direction like you're su…	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 11:25 PM
1	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. in a world where the primary mode of propegation is (Edit: heterosexual) sex it most certainly does. Edit: If you're interested in learning more about herd immunity and have the stomach for scholarly articles, you can check out: Role of herd immunity in determining the effect of vaccines against sexually transmitted disease. It actually specifically discusses the single sex vaccination strategy for HPV, and includes the logical and mathmatical proofs for the validity of this strategy.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 07:43 PM
1	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. you mean to say the men most at risk, not the people. when considering the entire population its still women by a landslide. I don't dispute that gay men don't benefit from the current scheme. I think that it would be reasonable to subsidize vaccinations for gay men.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 07:41 PM
6	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. You're ignoring the incidence rate of penile cancer vs cervical cancer, which is giving the illusion that these numbers in the same general region. Also, you're not taking into account the gender distribution of incidence of anal cancer. Also, where did you find the 70% of cervical cancers figure? I'm seeing 90% ( Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Mitchell RN (2007). Robbins Basic Pathology ((8th ed.) ed.). Saunders Elsevier. pp. 718–721.) When you crunch the numbers, it still makes more logical sens…	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 07:05 PM
11	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. the strains of Hpv vaccinated against are ones that have a strong link to cervical cancer. although men can contract these same strains, they "only" cause unsightly and treatable warts, rather than cancer. as well, the human body will destroy the infection on its own. another thing to consider is herd immunity, by vaccinating one gender for an std, you're essentially vaccinating both. if you have to pick a gender, it probably makes sense to pick the gender who will suffer the most dangerous cons…	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 05:54 PM
4	It costs $180 to get my son vaccinated for HPV, even though everyone I talked to says it's as much an issue for boys as girls. there are programs in canada for free vaccinations for school aged girls, most get it.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 05:43 PM
0	It looks like r/mensrights needs a reminder given the number of "Not All Feminists Are Like That" posts making the front page right now... by that logic I can't have a constructive debate about healthcare or guns in texas. Quit trying to radicalize mra's into what you see feminism as.	/r/MensRights	08/04/13 06:45 PM
1	Results from an online dating experiment: people aren't entitled to be sought after. this is interesting information but doesn't demand action.	/r/MensRights	24/02/13 05:32 PM
2	..Seriously? these are at MRU as well. Raged.	/r/MensRights	02/02/13 08:00 AM
0	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. guy, I didn't disagree that this guy handled it wrong. I was trying to give you some neutral insight into the reasoning into how it was differently wrong and to why people were reaching the conclusions they were. if you make no attempt to understand the reasoning of people you argue with you're going to have a bad time. you are welcome. being a douch isn't common sense. since you insist on mis-understanding this, I gave you a common and legitimate case where it is acceptable to reach over and ha…	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 08:28 AM
-1	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. This is how you're coming across. I don't even get why you're freaking out at all, let alone at me. I thought what I said was going to give you a more well rounded way to think about the situation so that you wouldn't be so baffled with this situation. I wasn't arguing with you. I'm not going to argue with you. I actually don't care. And even if I did, I don't even think I even disagree with you. Calm your shit.	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 05:16 AM
0	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. ok?	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 12:41 AM
9	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. He was thoughtlessly rude to benefit himself. She was intentionally rude to hurt him. They were both rude, but if I had to choose who was the bigger jerk, I'd say it was her after taking into account intention and motive.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 08:31 PM
6	I... I don't even... Don't become jaded. your approach was flawless. your execution was flawless. don't get caught up in the circlejerk. this isn't a war. I can't stress enough how perfectly you handled that.	/r/MensRights	23/01/13 08:57 AM
-4	"Of the seven dating agencies The New Paper contacted, none said they had a graduate woman client willing to be matched with a blue-collar worker. Mr Chan of Love Express Services said women who migh Nobody likes not making the cut... be it for a team, their dream university, the job they interviewed for, or for the affections of a potential lover. I would never dream of letting anyone dictate to me what concessions I should make on my choices of a lover. The reaction that I'm seeing here is objectively illogical and I can only chalk it up to people looking for sexism where none exists, or just plain butthurt that people don't measure up to somebodies standards.	/r/MensRights	18/01/13 08:04 PM
22	"Of the seven dating agencies The New Paper contacted, none said they had a graduate woman client willing to be matched with a blue-collar worker. Mr Chan of Love Express Services said women who migh I don't. Who told you that?	/r/MensRights	18/01/13 05:15 PM
-4	"Of the seven dating agencies The New Paper contacted, none said they had a graduate woman client willing to be matched with a blue-collar worker. Mr Chan of Love Express Services said women who migh This is not a mens rights issue. Nobody is entitled to a romantic partner at all, let alone one who meets some list of criteria.	/r/MensRights	18/01/13 05:15 PM
2	I'm actually offended and ashamed that you're eating this shit. Maybe I misunderstood "eating this shit". I don't care who said it or where it came from, its right. I don't care if its being said by a hippocrite, its right. how ironic that it has started an internal circlejerk here.	/r/MensRights	14/01/13 08:43 PM
3	I'm actually offended and ashamed that you're eating this shit. Say whatever you want, but the text of that image is plainly correct. if you start every conversation as if it is a war, don't be surprised if if that's how every conversation ends.	/r/MensRights	14/01/13 03:23 PM
4	You cannot win an argument with a feminist. If a male is ridiculed for acting feminine, it's because "femininity is seen an insult," but when a female is ridiculed for acting masculine, it's because s If a debate has degraded to ridicule, then it's not really even a debate anymore.	/r/MensRights	04/01/13 09:07 PM
3	Please pay attention to who you're upvoting in this sub. This post and several others are being HEAVILY concern trolled by feminists who have no other history ever commenting here. I think the issue with Feminism today is that it's generally just an unbridled grab for as much power as they can literally get their hands on without ever conceding anything or acknowledging cases where there is inequity in favour of women. I've always imagined men's rights to have this unspoken understanding, seeing this failing in feminism, that we push for men's rights to the point of equity and no further than that. Do I misunderstand?	/r/MensRights	02/01/13 06:50 PM
27	Please pay attention to who you're upvoting in this sub. This post and several others are being HEAVILY concern trolled by feminists who have no other history ever commenting here. The value of an idea is in its merit, not its source. I will upvote any post that makes a good point, no matter who wrote it. I don't need a vote coach.	/r/MensRights	02/01/13 01:27 AM
1	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Guy, I keep telling you: you were fixated on something I literally didn't say. I'm not sure how to rebut your claims that I said things other than to point out that I didn't even say them. And, if your argument (not even against me, because I hadn't been saying it) was that you're not consistently rude to people, doesn't that invite a verification? As a side note, why would you make that claim, knowing it would take about 5 seconds to check and discover that you're flat out lying? I'm glad you d…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 05:06 PM
1	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. "If" indicates a conditional. If it is raining, I will bring my umbrella. This statement doesn't mean that it is raining. You are wrong in your assertion that I was suggesting it is your only tool. Although, I've read through about 3 pages of comments you've made, and I'm actually going to say it now. You do favour using one tool over all others. The rate at which you are confrontational, sarcastic, and rude is well over half of your recent posts. So, now, having read this, I'm pretty sure you'r…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 08:29 AM
2	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. I think I could get on board with your idea of a political cartoon if you could demonstrate that political cartoons were effective in swinging opinion. In my experience (anecdotal, I'd seriously love to see actual studies on this) they normally only serve to re-enforce what people already believe to be the case, rather than inciting any change in thinking. Simply likening this to a political cartoon isn't sufficient, you'll have to convince me that political cartoons are actually beneficial inst…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 08:07 AM
2	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. I guess the questions I'd have when approaching this line of reasoning would be: "Can it be done without alienating hxc feminists?", "Should I expend any effort to not alientate hxc feminists?" and "How much effort is appropriate? How do I weigh the benefits against the cost?" Also, steamrolling over hxc feminists may be perceived as bullying by an average person. Depending on how its done (say, this instance) they might even be right. Above even looking at thing in a utilitarian risk/reward cos…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 04:46 AM
1	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Ok, I'll bite, what the hell are you talking about?	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 03:18 AM
1	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. This is the only logical argument anyone has made yet. That being said, can't we do both?	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 03:12 AM
0	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Nailed it. This is exactly my point. In only 2 posts from the point of using "ridicule" as a tool, we have completely left the issue at hand. This is not an appropriate tool in this situation, and the proof is in the pudding. Completely derailed, and this is now a meaningless pissing match. I'm sorry for calling you out like that, I was just trying to prove a point. Edit: I'm sorry, I didn't read the name and thought you were Zosimaise. I didn't call you out, I called him out. I was banking on h…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 03:04 AM
-1	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. 1) No you didn't. You'll notice that I didn't suggest that you had. 2) Yes, it is. You'll notice that I suggested that in my post. Ridiculing somebody you are on good terms with usually works well. It's fast, and you know that they won't hold it against you. 3) In your experience, how often has ridicule yielded the intended outcome when reasoning has failed? I ask this, you stupid fuck, because you just dropped the two most retarded "points" that I've ever heard. They demonstrated that you didn'…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 02:12 AM
2	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Not going to bite.	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 01:50 AM
4	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. I'll entertain this within a context other than the one at hand, being one of extreme selection bias: I need to put a wood screw into some wood. I have at my disposal the correct screwdriver bit already on my power drill, and a hammer. Although I could use the hammer to pound in the screw (and, on occasions where the drill was out of reach, have), it isn't the best tool for the job. Ridiculing somebody you are on good terms with usually works well. It's fast, and you know that they won't hold it…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 01:47 AM
19	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Without any shred of doubt in my mind, the greatest obstacle to furthering the cause of gender equality is shit like this picture. It diverts attention from the real issues and just entrenches people in their ideology. I causes us to be viewed as an enemy, and suddenly we have to work that much harder to just to have somebody take us seriously. In my experience, the worst thing I can do when trying to make a point about gender equality is mention "mens rights", because suddenly people get it in …	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 01:33 AM
14	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. Do you think that insulting people is constructive in the context of achieving equal rights for men? (The purpose of this subreddit, unless I am mistaken)	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 01:14 AM
83	Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters. I don't really think that it's fair to characterize the average SRSer, or feminist, as affluent. I imagine that the average SRSer, or feminist, is... well... average. This is selection bias, nothing more, and is unfair. The ideas put forth should be subject to scrutiny, but it's unreasonable to attack credibility of the people putting them forward. If an idea is bad, then that should be able to demonstrate that based on the merit of the idea itself. If you can't, then it probably isn't a bad ide…	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 12:55 AM
5	Well, they did it again, they found a way to make it our fault... Not going to be popular, but I'll say it: Acts of mass violence are more often perpetrated by men. Is there a reason for this? Is it wholly outrageous that the expectations to succeed and the failure to do so could periodically act as a trigger?	/r/MensRights	19/12/12 03:03 AM
1	My fiancee on utilizing massacres for political agendas OR "Why I want to marry this woman" Obviously I've completely missed the point of everything that you've said so far. I'd mistakenly thought you were presenting your arguments as if they somehow refuted what I'd originally said about how breaking a problem down into smaller problems was a good strategy to solving a big problem BECAUSE [the things you said]. I, of course, baffled at how anyone could think that breaking a large task into smaller tasks was a bad idea, and somehow be able to read, was just too floored to even comprehe…	/r/MensRights	08/12/12 12:03 AM
1	My fiancee on utilizing massacres for political agendas OR "Why I want to marry this woman" I'll talk about mental health issues all day. Mental health issues are a cause of violence. I will talk about a system that fails to rehabilitate violent offenders all day. Non-rehabilitated violent offenders commit violence because they were not rehabilitated. I will talk about lack of education and mentorship in youth, ignorance and improper social development cause violence. I will not talk about weapons. Weapons do not cause violence. If you want to break down the task of eradicating violenc…	/r/MensRights	07/12/12 10:41 PM
1	My fiancee on utilizing massacres for political agendas OR "Why I want to marry this woman" the general public isn't very good at breaking large complicated tasks into smaller less complicated tasks and then setting achieveable short medium and long term goals. humans are amazing in our ability to coordinate to solve impossible problems. A bad legal system doesn't make somebody hit their SO. Lockheed Martin doesn't make you stab a guy for his wallet. I agree changes have to be made for mental health and rehabilitation but don't go spouting conspiracy nonsense and start blaming the "cor…	/r/MensRights	07/12/12 07:26 PM
3	My fiancee on utilizing massacres for political agendas OR "Why I want to marry this woman" As long as it ends violence without intermediate steps that imply that violence is permissible against certain groups of people, I don't care how the lines are drawn. If people are comfortable drawing lines along gender lines, and it doesn't imply that violence is more wrong when perpetrated against one group, then I'm totally ok with that strategy. This is one of the few cases that I can say that if it's done right, splitting along gender lines to end violence is a case where the ends justify t…	/r/MensRights	07/12/12 03:38 AM
13	My fiancee on utilizing massacres for political agendas OR "Why I want to marry this woman" Very well written. Very well thought out. You're incredibly lucky to have such an intelligent, well-spoken girl as a SO. If I could just toss in one theoretical defence to the idea of "stopping violence against women", it would be the idea that sometimes when facing what may seem to be an insurmountable task (ending all violence), it makes sense to split up the task into smaller, more manageable tasks. Now, in this case I don't think that's fair, mainly because there is no such thing as "ending …	/r/MensRights	06/12/12 10:35 PM
1	And we wonder where their entitlement mindset came from. This isn't a random picture of sexism, because this picture isn't sexist. The man almost certainly was not forced, or even realistically expected to function as a chair for her, but he did. Had it been 2 women, 2 men, or the gender roles reversed, wouldn't make it sexist. If the guy was black, it wouldn't make it racist. Modern Feminism, in my opinion is just an "entitlement mindset". Calling it "feminism" and using wacky logic to turn entitlements into "equality" is just a way to shield it from…	/r/MensRights	19/11/12 07:07 AM
0	Y'all turning into SRS. We need to fix this place. You're right, and in my opinion, this community is too far gone. It is saturated with MRA-SRS'ers which actually turns off reasonable, rational, fair, and open-minded people. Not everyone here is, but its either the majority or the vocal majority. Look at the top comment, it's a guy who can't even comprehend the similarities, somebody who can't even step back and objectively consider the possibility that you can be right. He pounds out 4 obscure, meaningless, generalized (and biased) statements …	/r/MensRights	26/10/12 08:28 AM
-2	Men's Rights and Women's Rights are both Human Rights If you're a rational, logical person, I'd probably find another subreddit. This subreddit, despite it's name, has only the faintest connection to mens rights. It's primarily a "fuck feminists" platform. Somehow the focous has gotten so warped here, and I'm not sure if it's due to stupidity or lazyness but that is the state of affairs.	/r/MensRights	04/10/12 04:36 PM
1	Men aren't walking penises? To express my jealousy and sorrow.	/r/MensRights	01/10/12 04:05 PM
1	Men aren't walking penises? You have just eliminated any doubt in my assertion that you read way too far into things. How you were able to pull "you are a bad person" from what I said is incredible. I don't think that, I didn't suggest it, it's the farthest thing from my mind. If I think someone is a bad person, I will tell them. You're right, though, I didn't elaborate on what I meant by what I said. I was pretty sure it was obvious what I was meaning to say, but apparently it wasn't if you concluded that the take away me…	/r/MensRights	01/10/12 07:33 AM
-1	Men aren't walking penises? You are at the same time so lucky to be able to see whatever it is you want to see, and yet so cursed to only want to see injustice.	/r/MensRights	29/09/12 02:15 AM
1	I can barely contain my rage. Been treated as if I was a paedophile. That is fucking bull shit. Is this common?	/r/MensRights	09/09/12 01:38 AM
1	I can barely contain my rage. Been treated as if I was a paedophile. I'll take your bet. At least in Canada, all emergency responders (police,fire,medical) are pretty tight. The police would absolutely not delay the transportation of an injured child via ambulance if a scuffle broke out between a real responder and a "safety citizen" or whatever these guys are. They know what its like responding to emergencies. They know that the ambulance guys know what its like responding to emergencies. They know that protecting the health of a child is their FIRST priority, a…	/r/MensRights	08/09/12 07:00 PM
20	Because of this sub, I had a quick conversation with a single father at the dog park. (Hear me out ... lady here.) Babies can sense the emotional tenseness and anger and it distresses them. I think he did it totally right. He barely paid any attention to her, his focous was on his child. You know, that thing that's more important than being right.	/r/MensRights	07/09/12 03:41 PM
2	Just quick threw this together. Thought this sub might appreciate it. Perhaps another one along this theme could be pictures of emergency crews being sent to chernobyl.	/r/MensRights	30/08/12 09:31 PM
1	Why MRAs Should Be Pro-Choice: If only rape victims are allowed abortions, false accusations will skyrocket. I totally get where you're coming from (As much as someone without a cervix can, I suppose. I'll just pretend someone was going to shove a wire in my testicles, I do not want that.) Like I said, I'm not actually taking a position on the issue of abortion, the position I'm taking is one on the logic. Maybe "irrational" was the wrong word, or maybe I should have explained what part of the behavior I consider to be irrational. You do bring up a valid point when you said that it changes things when …	/r/MensRights	29/08/12 02:06 PM
2	Why MRAs Should Be Pro-Choice: If only rape victims are allowed abortions, false accusations will skyrocket. I don't agree with the logic you put forth in your title, to rephrase: MRA's should be pro-choice, because if women do not have access to abortions, they will accuse men of rape more frequently. I'm not going to get into the morality of abortion, because it is irrelevant to the issue I have with what you've stated, and it forms no portion whatsoever to my argument. This seems so simple to me, that I'm not sure how to fully explain this without saying some things that are so incredibly basic that…	/r/MensRights	28/08/12 10:57 PM
5	School refused to let me pick up my son Get a lawyer, right now, and crucify the school, right now. The only thing that institutions like this understand is getting sued, and you have a real opportunity to take this situation and turn it into a positive thing for men everywhere. Sue them for every single penny you can, and I KNOW that you can effect a systematic change in the way schools in your whole state (maybe the whole country) treat this kind of situation.	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 12:20 AM
3	Am I wrong in finding this a little offensive? Why don't you just accept that you're terrifying, you beast of a man, you.	/r/MensRights	24/08/12 04:16 AM
5	Google's definition of Rape Protip: Don't broach the subject from the MRA stance (At first). Submit the challenge "Many women experience the horror of being forced into sexual acts at the hands of other females prisoners while incarsarated. What is this called, if not rape?" Once you establish that it is possible for a woman to rape a woman, the logic follows more fluidly to those resistant to the idea that a woman could then also rape a man.	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 02:24 AM
1	Violence Against Men is Funny I think this is funny, because it's a string of mistakes and includes some slapstick. This sounds like it came straight out of a 3 stooges sketch. Also, I don't know what happened with the dude, but I'm guessing he shrugged it off and went on with his night... accepting that it was a mistake. Like a reasonable grown person SHOULD. We could get into a "Well SHE wouldn't have done that!" , but what does that change, really? Can we not hold ourselves to our OWN standards, instead of stooping to som…	/r/MensRights	30/07/12 12:57 AM
1	I want to apologize to you guys "uh huhuhuh... you said 'movement' ... uh huhuhuh"	/r/MensRights	15/07/12 01:34 AM
1	Here's how to get rid of SRS for good. Frankly I don't think they go far enough: I want to start /r/shitshitredditsayssays so that I can grab all the stuff they're upset about and get upset about how they aren't upset enough about it.	/r/MensRights	14/07/12 07:48 PM
-1	Women don't like it when FGM is called "Female Circumcision", and I don't blame them. It's important to them to emphasize that it's mutilation. Shouldn't we also be openly outraged about the double standard of MGM being called circumcision? I'm going to be real with you guys: I can't even comprehend why people get so upset about circumcision. It's a passionately debated topic and I just don't get why I'm supposed to be upset. I'm cut, and I'm 120% happy with everything down there. Are people who are against it generally cut or uncut? I'm just curious if I can chalk it up to "Eww, thats different than me, how could they justify doing something that makes them different than me?" or if there is the more legitimate "How dare my parent…	/r/MensRights	12/07/12 04:12 PM