Windwaker525 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Because men have sex for their direct pleasure, sometimes if she’s lucky for both simultaneously. Where as at best, a woman receives pleasure from experiencing how her blowjob affects the man. There is a reason men masturbate their penis and women don’t masturbate their mouths. Submission has to do with intent, not directly with objective occurrence. In theory a man could pop viagra and sleep with a woman he has no attraction for, purely to get her off. But this would never happen since it’s not…	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 09:09 PM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) “My argument wasn’t legal. Laws are inherently subjective. My argument is based on objective differences between adults and children, women and men. I don’t care about your scientific claims, science is there to serve interest groups, not find objective truths. Science needs money, so the science with the preferred results will get funded and anything else won’t. But even if we were to start engaging in studies, literally all of history and biology and anthropology shows us that female and male …	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 08:58 PM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Constantly stating that my arguments are illogical without any following justification for these claims is basically ad hominem. It’s reputation destruction. But I digress. I responded to your one lengthy engagement with my arguments. How about you respond to that and tell me where my logic is faulty, or unfounded in comparison to feminist positions and general human reasoning.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 08:57 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) It was part of my argument, and also OPs. So please explain to me how you come to the conclusion that OP is engaging in “deconstruction” and I am not. Maybe then I can elaborate my ideas, but at the moment I haven’t a clue what you want from me to justify my position.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 08:52 PM
-1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) In puberty and sometimes I get morning wood yes. But that I can thrust my hard on in a vag being unaroused, definitely not. Even if by some miracle a woman managed to squeeze my morning word into herself, the minute I wake up and am unaroused I would instantly go limp. Maybe saying you’re fulfilling his picture perfect fantasy is a bit far, but I don’t believe a man can be hard in sex unaroused. He may be aroused by the fact you undermining him. Orgasm without being satisfied is an oxymoron. Wha…	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 08:04 PM
-1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Well it’s impossible to diagnose you over the internet and much sexuality can occur as a result of childhood trauma. Nevertheless I’ll take your word for it. You still make your bf cum which inherently means you are satisfying him, arguably in the majority of sex men don’t care if women orgasm. Also the rp discussion is about body count so penetrative sex. You can be an experienced domme with a body count of 0. But to have sex with a man, the man must always be aroused, the women must not. This …	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 05:22 PM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) So you knew it was your sexuality and then chose a vanilla relationship? or after the relationship you realised you were domme?	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 05:10 PM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Are you a domme because it is your inherent sexual fantasy? Or are you domme because your boyfriend wants you to be?	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 05:01 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) In literally the first response you gave to my actual arguments, not just the overall disdain for my position, you literally didn’t give me a chance to respond and continued with your ad hominem attacks that the cult like red pill can’t take scrutiny… bla bla bla. Even now you keep asserting “logical fallacies and false equivalences” and “learn basic knowledge and you may be able to understand an argument” completely ignoring my response to your first time criticism of my argument. Essentially y…	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 12:14 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) In response to me saying everyones views are tainted by the assertions of others you replied with your little lecture on “deconstruction of beliefs” and “identifying latent biases” implying that I wasn’t doing so. You then went on to claim that “OP and many others on this sub” are in the process of doing it. While giving two examples of where I was not doing it, one of which (interactionality) was literally OP’s original thesis, not mine.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 11:58 AM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Yes. Or at very least the giving a bj is extremely submissive. There’s a reason “cocksucker” or “suck my dick” is an age old cross-cultural insult, and not “he who lets his dick be sucked”. The submissiveness of the act is literally the part that is the biggest sexual turn on for the man.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/24 11:50 AM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) My argument wasn’t legal. Laws are inherently subjective. My argument is based on objective differences between adults and children, women and men. I don’t care about your scientific claims, science is there to serve interest groups, not find objective truths. Science needs money, so the science with the preferred results will get funded and anything else won’t. But even if we were to start engaging in studies, literally all of history and biology and anthropology shows us that female and male a…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 09:47 PM
2	Things are not what I thought (Musings) I’m literally begging anyone to actually engage with my arguments instead of just casting ad hominems. The reason I’m saying those who dessent rp choose to remain ignorant is precisely because they avoid directly engaging in logically scrutinising or questioning it. Replace rp with feminism and everything you say is 100% correct. Everything you say is what I face when I state my opinion. I questioned the views here and was either ignored or immediately shutdown. I’m literally asking anyone who d…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 09:03 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) If OP is doing it why does he then still observe women to be interactional?	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 08:54 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) I don’t classify either as better I classify them as different. Just like cats and dogs. And the reason for this is the reason we all seek truth in this world, to operate accordingly and avoid turmoil and achieve bliss for us and those around us. If I drive a car from a to b, I learn before hand how it works and don’t just hop in and say “who cares? every car is different you know”. Then crash and burn. And many, many men and women do crash and burn from not understanding each other. I can say t…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 06:54 PM
-1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) You just said a whole lot of nothing. You literally addressed 0 points I made.	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 06:46 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) I didn’t read the rules and genuinely came here out of curiosity, to find out why people who once saw truth in redpill now deny it? Why let Morpheus pull you out of your unconsciousness and show you the operations of the real world, just to snatch the blue pill and go right back to sleep? I’m not upset, and while his post did conclude slight differences between men and women, he still very much operates from a feminist egalitarian baseline, where by it is attempted to tie women and men to the sa…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 05:10 PM
1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) I didn’t read the rules and genuinely came here out of curiosity, to find out why people who once saw truth in redpill now deny it? Why let Morpheus pull you out of your unconsciousness and show you the operations of the real world, just to snatch the blue pill and go right back to sleep? I’m not upset, and while his post did conclude slight differences between men and women, he still very much operates from a feminist egalitarian baseline, where by it is attempted to tie women and men to the sa…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 05:09 PM
-4	Things are not what I thought (Musings) You are a smart dude and 100% correct. This is were all their feminist logic falls apart and they run out of answers. Attributing characteristics to all humans in general is just as generalising. Yet everyone does this. It is completely hypocritical to label us as illogical or inexperienced for generalising women. If anything, our theories are more nuanced and perceptive than their blank-slate humanism.	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 10:41 AM
0	Things are not what I thought (Musings) So because I disagree with someone on Reddit of all places I’m now part of a cult? But the uncult-like personalities are those who use ad hominems without engaging in arguments? The only Cult here is believing men and women are the same without ever having to justify it, to the point people can literally not even define what a man and a women is and believe that ascribing human attributes to both gender is not generalising, but ascribing attributes to the genders individually is generalising, la…	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 10:34 AM
-1	Things are not what I thought (Musings) Tell me, whose views are NOT tainted buying the assertions of others?	/r/ExRedPill	09/12/24 10:23 AM
-12	Things are not what I thought (Musings) You are wrong in all your assertions. Let me explain. The rp view points you describe as extreme, are not nearly portrayed as extreme enough for you to really understand the core message. Women come from Venus, men from Mars. You are still caught in the feminist fog and thus can’t make sense of the ascribed attributes to groups of seemingly equal individual. Let me start with the most obvious misconception. You said it yourself. If we count masturbation as sex and porn as sexual partners, men ar…	/r/ExRedPill	08/12/24 11:13 PM
1	How common is it for women to not be sexually/physically attracted to their partners (husband/boyfriend/etc.)? Or, at least, “as” sexually/physically attracted as they had been to other dudes/hookups/ONS/etc. Women grant access to sex (dating). Men grant access to relationships (marriage, boyfriend/girlfriend). Short ugly men are disadvantaged by women. No one in rp says they have it harder earning. Many attributes contribute to being alpha, it’s the overall sum and not exclusives. You can very much be a 5,5 alpha, or a 30k a year alpha. You can also very much be a 6,6 beta, or a billionaire beta. it’s your overall ability to attract women that counts, your masculine personality is decisive, everythi…	/r/ExRedPill	08/12/24 09:15 PM