TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Winter_of_Discontent Archive

View 3 posts and 123 comments by Winter_of_Discontent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I've seen some ridiculous posts on this sub, but this might be the fuckin' dumbest. Yeah, just deny that oppressed groups exist. Deny the concept of working to reach equality for said groups.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:15 AM
1

Gotta love the unspoken agreement that /r/mensrights is really just /r/whitemensrights
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:25 AM
1

This is on the hypothetical that they are open and honest about their pedophilia. Munn was informed of this man's pedophilia, and his attempt to act on it. She reacted in what I believe to be a reasonable fashion, as I wouldn't want a convicted and admitted pedophile's fingerprints on my work either. Would you want an admitted, though unconvicted, pedophile to work with you? Would that not suly your work for you?
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:01 PM
6

Yeah, but this isn't a court. These are not legal consequences. These are social consequences. Similar to how being a pedophile is legal, so long as you don't act on it. Doesn't mean people want to work with you though.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:20 PM
2

A few years back when I first subscribed here it didn't seem as rampant as it is today. Redpillers and open mysogynists were shunned. I recall several posts on the subs page back in the day bemoaning articles constantly lumping us in with redpillers and the like. Now there's little distinction to be made, honestly.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:27 AM
0

Yes, and I totally agree. I understand that, and am aware that to a great extent I'm a hypocrite. If you do your time for a drug offense, it should not be held against you. This seems... Different, though, don't you think? How would you feel about sharing a cubicle with an attempted child rapist? If you were Munn, would you be able to look back on that movie as anything other than "the one where I worked with a child rapist. Oh, look, the pedophile's scene is coming up."
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:17 AM
6

Weird amount of sympathy for a dude who tried to rape his fourteen years old cousin. Gee, I wonder why this sun has such a bad rep.?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:56 PM
5

Literally nothing.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:12 AM
-1

Are you more ashamed to cry in front of women, or other men?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:56 PM
-2

Well no shit. Now you're just being stupid. I'm not talking about mandatory thought censoring, I'm talking about healthy vs. damaging cultural attitudes.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:52 PM
1

And if you took those issues with it I couldn't care less. The cavalier attitude about false rape accusations in the tweet is an issue. It's the hysteria in this thread seeing it as a dead serious confession that irks me.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:50 PM
-6

What? This is /r/mensrights. This is where people discuss such things. Do you think men should have the attitude that they're not allowed to show emotion? Think they're unable to be raped? Have to always be sacrificial? Any failure means they're weak? I'd say those things are exactly why male suicide rates are so high. Men not asking for help, because they don't think a man should need help.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:43 PM
0

In regards to your point about the good and the bad, I'd say it's simple why. No one ever make it on the news by driving home safely. There are good parts, obviously, but there's less of a reason to discuss them because they're good, not damaging.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:38 PM
-3

Because something actually happens a joke can't be made about it? Literally can't be done? I'm not talking about whether it's a good, funny, or inoffensive joke. I'm saying it's simply not a dead serious confession like y'all are acting.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:35 PM
-1

Sorry, are you disputing my points above? Do you not mind those attitides? Honestly, I've no idea what the downsides are of femininity. Couldn't tell you, never had to experience it.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:29 PM
-1

I'm downvoted to oblivion because of where I am, not what I'm saying. Go ahead and get offended. Get angry at a shitty, tasteless joke. Couldn't give a shit. Just don't pretend something is a dead serious confession because it suits your narrative.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:29 PM
0

Things like "man up" are literally saying be more masculine. It's often discussed here that downsides of masculinity are the above issues. It's the want to be strong and show no weaknesses, not a weird, puritanic view of sex.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:26 PM
1

Goddamn, no wonder it's taking forever.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:24 PM
1

Only if the teacher is equally hysterical.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:24 PM
2

So get offended and angry on that front. Just don't go saying it's a confession of planning to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:22 PM
1

Hey, be offended. Never said it was a good, or inoffensive joke. It is a joke though, not a confession of crimes.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:21 PM
0

Except the classroom is here. This sub is the classroom.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:20 PM
-10

Man up. Men don't cry. Men don't get raped. All things men say. All examples of hypermasculinity. It's not necessarily a bad thing. Could be exactly the kind of thing this sub should be all for.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:09 AM
1

Ah, fuck. Didn't realize how late it was. I work in 6 hours. Don't worry, it's a long shift. I'll probably get bored and pick this up again later. See yah.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:50 AM
1

I've been on this sub for years. It really isn't difficult to get a feel for it, particularly when you've spent as much time here as I have.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:49 AM
1

I hate it now. Didn't always. There's always hope that it'll go back to an issue-based sub that has issues with Redpill crossover and some misogyny, rather than a misogyny-based sub with some crossover with issues.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:46 AM
1

I'm not white knighting. I couldn't give a shit about her. It's not m'lady's sullied reputation that bothers me, it's this sub's hysteria. I've been on this sub for years. It was never great. Always had problems. Still though, to actively see it fall farther and farther from what it's supposed to be pains me. Edit: I don't feel any need to argue against the Utah idiots. You did that for me in your own post.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:33 AM
1

Said the dude who keeps pulling up Facebook posts of people bragging about crimes after the fact. He doesn't speak for him, but there are three options: attempting to enlist him to assassinate the President, encouraging him to assassinate the President, or joking. Two of them are crimes.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:27 AM
0

It is either enlisting a man to assassinate the President, encouraging a man to assassinate the President, or a joke. Two are crimes.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:22 AM
1

Look at the picture again. The Instagram comments are laughing emojis. Missed that, huh? You see, outside the filter of this forum people did see it as a joke. Why? They didn't have an agenda. No narrative to force on it. This forum isn't the general populace. This is what I meant by it messing with your perspective. The things said in this sub are not generally held views. The average person would not read the OP and see a confession. This sub likes false rape accusations, just like it likes cr…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:20 AM
0

And this one, without the meme? Should you call the Secret Service and file a report? His handle isn't even censored.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:05 AM
-1

What exactly makes it obvious?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:04 AM
-2

Is this guy planning murder or joking? Seriously, I want to know what you think.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:52 AM
-2

What do you think of this? Should someone call the Secret Service, or is it a joke?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:49 AM
-6

I recall that Facebook idiocy very well. Hense my emphasis on premeditated. I don't recall those people posting any statuses saying that they're going to kidnap a random white dude and torture him for maybe supporting Trump. There's an obvious difference there. Broadcasting a crime is very stupid, but how many posts have you seen where people say that they're planning to rob a bank before they do it?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:37 AM
-12

This is dumb. You're seeing what is clearly a light-hearted tweet as a person choosing to incriminate themselves in public for what would have to be a very premeditated crime. Seriously, take a step back and look at it. Think about it critically for just a second. Imagine if it actually didn't fit the narrative you want it to. This would be a person planning to commit a serious crime. This would be a person permanently broadcasting their intent to commit a serious crime. Not lashing out in anger…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:23 AM
-1

You see this as proof because you want it to be. No person without an agenda would see it as such. This is one of the more nonsensical posts I've seen make it to the front page of this sub.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:11 AM
-139

What makes you so sure it's serious? Do you know OP personally? Of course not, don't be ridiculous. I know this is a joke just like I know when someone posts "Uhg, I hate exams. Kill me now." they don't actually want someone to kill them. Edit: Do y'all remember back in grade school when it was a joke to poke a person's bellybutton and say "I just raped you"? Here's what's happening in this thread right now: A dude walked up to a female friend of his, poked her in the belly button, and she said …
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:12 AM
-177

In the same way that Jim Jefferies and Anthony Jeselnik don't exactly help the cause that not all men are rapists. Yah know, because they crack jokes about rape. Edit: Quick! Someone call the Secret Service! This man is clearly enlisting help to assassinate the President!
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:00 AM
-245

Yep. Because of blatantly facetious tweets. Edit: Bet y'all can't get me to -250. Edit: Getting close. C'mon, just 7 more and this'll be my most downvoted comment. I believe in y'all.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:43 AM
-2

God, how much lower can this sub get? Are we no longer even pretending that this sub is about equality? This seems like some /r/NiceGuys shit.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:26 PM
1

Exactly. Caring is not a finite resource.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:40 AM
1

"Let" in the context he describes means they didn't physically stop him. "I just kiss them, I don't even wait." What is he not waiting for? The solstice? Nah, consent.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:38 AM
1

"Let" in the context he describes means they didn't physically stop him. "I just kiss them, I don't even wait." What is he not waiting for? The solstice? Nah, consent.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:33 AM
2

I just kiss them, I don't even wait.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:31 AM
2

I've been subbed here for a solid 3-4 years. I can't speak to the movement as a whole, but this subreddit is vehemently anti-women. For a little while I thought it was a minority, then a vocal minority, but no, this sub is just women hating trash. I've had arguments on this sub with men talking about how all women are actively trying to kill all men, how all marital rape laws should be repealed, et cetera. It's really, really sad. Men face real issues in the world. Circumcision, custody, the Dra…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:29 AM
1

I'm not the one comparing them. Literally commented saying not to do that.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:06 AM
1

Neither were men's rights issues, and you know it. Stop being dumb.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:41 PM
4

While that article looks stupid, context is a thing. Replacing it with a known oppressed class makes a clear difference. Please don't compare the plight of men to that of slavery and the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:50 PM
4

Attack helicopter shit I'll grant you. Identifying as a specific non-human thing is absurd. Saying that you don't feel that your gender matches the two binary options seems normal enough. We're already seen as a hate group, let's not become one.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 04:35 PM
5

Where on earth is this required?
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:03 AM
7

Ah, yes. Because the MRM needs to associate itself with a healthy dose of transphobia, just to be safe.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:46 AM
6

And then Albert Einstein gives you 100 bucks.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:45 AM
8

Aaaand people in this sub wonder why it has a reputation for misogyny. Jesus Christ guys, this is the top fucking comment. Let alone the fact that man up, boys don't cry, men don't get raped, etc. would all be included in Toxic Masculinity. Edit: Hold up, more sexist than men have ever been? Goddamn. This sub has become a joke.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:42 AM
2

Grounds for divorce are one thing, but calling for the end of all marital rape laws isn't non-PC, it's directly advocating for rape.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:56 PM
-7

Pot is illegal, doesn't mean there's a stigma.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:10 PM
3

You act as though the logical thing to do is to accept y'all's hate and misogyny because y'all's feelings have been hurt.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:18 PM
6

Pain doesn't make what they say okay. It's a shitty excuse.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:05 PM
-2

But, had they had representation, things clearly would have been different for them.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:33 AM
3

LMAO this is on the top of their front page right now: https://np.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/57hmbr/sexual_assault_is_why_im_endorsing_donald_trump/
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:43 AM
9

I challenge you to find me anything in the red pill that is the slightest bit 'rapey'. LOL. Went to the sub real quick. Literally the top post on the front page is a post stating that they're endorsing Donald Trump because he's recently been accused of Sexual Assault.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:42 AM
2

Either TRP isn't shitty, or it is shitty in a way that others are too. Pick one.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:28 AM
7

I used to get upset at people for throwing us in the same bucket as TRP, but lately I've noticed that they're really not wrong to do so. This sub accepts TRPers with open arms. The venn diagram of TRP subscribers and MR subscribers has got to overlap greatly.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:27 AM
8

Except it is on the red pill. Hence the link to the red pill. Unless and until society recognizes that marriage in general entitles a man to sex with his wife then we will not discontinue the strike. No, he doesn't clarify that at all. He explains why he wants them repealed, he doesn't go on to say that he doesn't actually want them repealed.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:23 AM
5

That is exactly what people say about men's rights. Dude. It's kinda hard to deny that ~half of any given comment section on this subreddit is a cesspool of blatant misogyny and hate. I've been in arguments on this sub before where the other guy insisted that all women hate men, all women want to kill all men, and all women were actively trying to ensure that it happens. Our reputation as a sub is well earned, even if it's not fun to admit it.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:17 AM
1

I'm sorry, but are you pretending that hyper-masculinity has no traces of homophobia in it? Bruh. The phrase "No Homo" not only exists, but is entirely common among a particular gender.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:07 AM
4

Hey, just in case you were wondering, your comment right here is exactly why people refer to this as a hate sub. Get your misogynistic bullshit out of here. We're supposed to at least pretend to be better than that.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:05 AM
-4

How, exactly, does the over-representation of men in public positions somehow provide tangible benefits to all other men as a group? When only men were politicians, women suffered. When only white people were politicians, people of color suffered. When you allocate most or all power to one group, people outside of that group tend to be abused, oppressed, or generally neglected.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:02 AM
63

Yeah. I had to do that for a while. Once you take a step back, then take another look at this subreddit.. it's not pretty.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:06 PM
0

But look at it this way: Doctor you think she'll be likely do make a false report again, after completing her sentence? I don't. We need to put much more emphasis on reforming criminals, rather than just getting even.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:57 PM
3

Presenting: The Shitpost to end all Shitposts
/r/MensRights27/05/16 08:13 PM
1

The latter is more what I'm referring to. Though it isn't so much stupidity, more insidiousness. You see people accusing women of being evil, as a general whole, to varying extents all the time here. Those sentiments are sometimes rejected, sometimes supported by this sub. I feel/hope that this is just a snowball effect.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:28 PM
1

It also doesn't identify anyone by name. There is clearly a lot of context missing, that exists elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:19 AM
1

They can be. At which point you're refusing to serve them because they're being assholes, not because they're gay/black. It's not like you have to serve every member of a protected class, regardless of their actions.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 11:23 PM
1

I'll ceceed that point. His comparison of feminism and naziism are terrible examples, just the first thing that came to mind. To my larger point: do you deny that hate speech is often posted here? I'm not saying it's most of the content, and the community doesn't always support it, but it's still here. This subreddit has a reputation for misogyny, and regardless of whether that was true from the beginning, that reputation is sure to attract misogynist posters. We've all seen them here, posting r…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:38 PM
1

You seem to be mistaken. Societal consequences that are non-governmental are not infringements on your First Amendment protected Freedom of Speech. If you're at a party and start spouting things about how women are all evil, cheating, lying cunts that can't be trusted, and the host of the party kicks you out for being an asshole, they're not infringing on your Freedom of Speech. Freedom is Speech is not forcing people to listen to you. No one is stopping you from saying whatever bullshit you wan…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:30 PM
1

Do I think they censor anything that could be a PR disaster? I mean, I'd presume. Can't really see why they wouldnt.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:23 PM
1

That would be descriminating against a protected class. Assholes are not a protected class.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:45 AM
1

In no way does Facebook have a monopoly. There are many, many other social networking sites. If you make a website, why shouldn't you be able to decide its content? If there was a monopoly you'd be right, but that's far from the case.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:50 AM
1

I wouldn't say should, I don't think they have any moral imperative or anything, but I can understand why they would. They in no way benefit from leaving that page up, and risk looking as though they support it. Same reason reddit did away with jailbait and what not. It's in their clear best interest, hard to hold it against them.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:59 AM
-2

No, but I can't blame Facebook for wanting to delete a cesspool of misogyny. Are we really pretending that that isn't a thing? That we don't all see the comments saying the most ridiculous things? Like, for instance, the "feminism is hitler" Dumbass above me? I once had a guy in this sub try to argue the point that all women hate men, and that all women are actively trying to kill all men.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:36 AM
-3

No, but I can't blame Facebook for wanting to delete a cesspool of misogyny. Are we really pretending that that isn't a thing? That we don't all see the comments saying the most ridiculous things? Like, for instance, the "feminism is hitler" Dumbass above me? I once had a guy in this sub try to argue the point that all women hate men, and that all women are actively trying to kill all men.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:36 AM
2

And, to be clear, it is somehow the same, even when one is government censorship, and the other is a private corporation enforcing it's TOS?
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:30 AM
-8

Yes, because clearly not believing that feminism is the modern day Nazi party means that I just don't know history. It's stupid shit like this that makes it harder and harder to defend this movement, let alone this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 01:29 AM
-8

If it's anything like this subreddit, there was probably a lot of legitimate hate speech. I mean, we aren't pretending that's not a thing, are we? We attract redpillers like flies, no reason to believe that'd be any different.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 11:26 PM
-15

Lol. Feminism=literal hitler!@!!
/r/MensRights09/04/16 11:24 PM
-1

Why do we care about what she has to say? Great shitpost, OP.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:00 PM
10

Vast majority? Yep. I'd love to see a source for that.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:24 AM
1

Well... Yeah. It's a sub reddit about feminism, and you basically posted "This is why you're wrong." How do you think you'd fare if you posted a left-wing video on /r/conservative?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:24 AM
2

I don't think that she was saying we need femininity, but rather acknowledging that we have a very basic need, intimacy, that gets hammered out of us by society. Essentially saying that "man up" is harmful, and that men are emotional beings too.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:21 AM
1

You just said that women, as a whole, want all men dead. That really doesn't warrant an in-depth reply.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:42 PM
1

Women just dont really care whether men in general live or die as long as they get theirs. Its just completely inconsequential to them. Theres no common ground with someone who is happy for you to be eradicated from the face of the earth. There is no civil debate there to be had. It just doesnt exist. Jesus Christ. What, did you go through a rough break-up recently? Did mom leave when you were a child? Because that's some sandwich-board, end-is-near type crazy. Im active in all three major subse…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:47 PM
0

That's simply not the truth. You are, for some reason, assuming that the average black person would be perfectly okay with slavery as long as it isn't them being enslaved. It's a ridiculous stance, and hardly a fact. Moreover, it's not about political correctness, it's about PR. We, right now, have the reputation for being a bunch of mysoginistic, racist, white guys. This has a negative affect on the movement as a whole, as civil rights movements are won and lost by popularity. This is also why …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:40 AM
0

It's shit like this that gives us a bad rap.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:08 PM
0

You both assumed that /u/slayerx1779 was a woman, and then suggested that she get her uterus removed, implying that it was making her crazy. People like you are our loud minority, painting us all to be mysoginists. That kind of behavior actively hurts the entire movement, and makes it far easier to dismiss.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 05:57 PM
39

Yep. See, we on this subreddit are so quick to put the burden of proof on the accuser, not because that's how the legal system is supposed to work regardless of the crime, but because we're actually rabbidly Pro-Rape. MRA actually stands for Men who think Rape is Awesome. /s
/r/MensRights02/06/15 09:11 PM
2

I don't think she can legally profit off of crimes committed, e.g. OJ's "If I did it."
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:31 PM
19

Just wait, ten years down the road she'll admit it was all a publicity stunt, but by then no one will give a shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:39 AM
1

That makes sense, it's just not how I took his comment.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:28 PM
-9

Are you saying you don't believe in equality?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:43 PM
-1

Ah, the "if I can't have it, no one can" stance. I'm sure that'll help.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:43 PM
1

The way they're all phrased exactly the same makes this seem fake to me.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:18 AM
0

Listen, there's slut shaming, "mast key, master lock" etc. Then there's 'you did what?' Yes, and what you did is "master key, master lock etc." You literally just said you were slut shaming, then just kind of continued to do so. Furthermore, someone being promiscuous when single does not equal promiscuity when taken. TL;DR You're one of the assholes who give MRA's a bad reputation. Take that shit to /r/theredpill where it belongs.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:55 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the guys would have talked about it amongst themselves. "Hey, I had sex with Lana."
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:50 PM
2

But that's not what he said, is it? He's blatantly saying a double standard.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:20 AM
2

Honestly, I consider this a win for us. She said she was drinking and decided to have sex with every man at the party. The fact that the columnist didn't spin this in to some Rolling Stones gang rape bullshit shocked me. As soon as she mentioned that she was drinking and consented I thought the columnist was going to correct her. Not great, but way better than I thought it'd be. I count it as a win.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:19 PM
5

Saying that she needs to take responsibility for her actions is one thing, but implying she's worth less as a person because she's slept with a lot of guys is just slut shaming. Don't make the feminists right about us.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:12 PM
8

He's clearly consenting. Don't make us as bad as them.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:42 PM
2

Solid point.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:28 PM
7

I'm confused, are you saying that it is only okay for the defense to use this strategy if they would do the same with a male defendant? They should be doing everything they can to get the the defendant off, it's their job. Relying on the judge/jury to be sexist isn't unethical, it's their best bet.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:37 PM
4

People like you are the reason we have a reputation for being misogynists.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:03 PM
5

Honestly, being black probably didn't help.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:43 PM
1

Also interested in this.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 08:42 AM
2

I'm in.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:00 AM
2

I mean, I don't know that it gets a thumbs down.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:40 PM
1

Upon googling your source: American Renaissance has been described as a white supremacist publication by the Anti-Defamation League[1] and by Espeth Reeve of The Atlantic Wire.[2] It was designated a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center.[3]
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:32 PM
3

It's actually three times as likely that they'll be imprisoned when compared to the general male population.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:29 AM
7

I disagree. 1/3 black men will be in prison at some point in their lifetime, but only 1/17 for white men, and 1/9 for all men. Three times the likelihood of imprisonment seems significant to me. Source.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:27 AM
24

"Police realize that the entire world is watching their shit show."
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:55 AM
1

I honestly don't see how my post can be seen as trolling. I'm not advocating for feminism in any way, nor am I defending it.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:55 PM
5

Wait, are the kids his or theirs?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:38 PM
2

This is idiotic. For being men? How about for being Drag Queens in Alabama?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:59 AM
2

I'm legitimately unsure of why you were downvoted so, I thought you raised a fair point.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter