TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wintermute- Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by Wintermute- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree, sports do have varying degrees of violence. What they have in common is that you, the participant, are consenting to have said violence possibly visited upon you. "A lot of people's sex is a lot more dangerous than a lot of people's sports." I'm not sure what kind of sex you've been having, or what sort of sports you play, but I won't believe that without some proof. And I never said that you could have sex without force. Sex, after all can be a violent thing. As long as it takes place …
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:59 AM
1

Oh man, basketball and rape have now been muddled. This is going downhill. When you play a sport, you consent to perform in a violent climate. Example: if I punch someone standing in the street, it would be assault. However, if I punch my friend when we have all of our boxing gear on (gloves, wraps, shoes) it would not be assault. While he could still file a civil suit, it would go nowhere. I hope the difference is understood.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:59 AM
1

A googl'ing of violence led me to the definition of violence being "intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual..." Idk man seems like all rape falls into that category. I dont see how it doesn't. If someone were to rape me, statutory or otherwise, I would definitely consider it violence and I would hope you would feel the same. I just meant consent in general. The law says someone under x age is not able to give consent to sexual acts with someone over x age and to me that'…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:12 AM
1

I'm glad to hear that violence is the tipping point for you, seeing as all rape is violent. When somebody, through coercion or strength, forces someone in to intercourse it's a violent act. The law says that while you're under the age of x, usually 16-18, you cannot consent to sexual acts with someone over x, and I believe that's reasonable.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:20 AM
1

While the older party can certainly consent to sex with a minor, the younger party can not. I would say it's still just as serious. It may or may not involve violence, and it involves the coercion and manipulation of a younger mind that will have a harder time coping and coming to terms with what happened.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:10 AM
1

Statutory rape is rape, plain and simple. I'm not sure what you're saying by 'rape-rape'. Is statutory rape somehow less serious?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:11 PM
1

I would really like more info on this, especially location. If this was in California then it was statutory rape. If she's in an area where 16 is the age of consent, it makes this situation a pretty tough call. There's more information needed before a solid judgement can be made.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter