TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Witriol Archive

View 2 posts and 21 comments by Witriol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Your argument is essentially making excuses for what the OP has written and taking liberties in interpreting work that is not even yours. It was a badly written article and i elaborated why, I am not going to argue with some random guy who didn't even write the original .Trying to sound profound does not make it profound and you should have higher standards for submissions in your subreddit because all it will lead to is people eternally clarifying themselves to each other. Also , this evolution…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/13 07:57 PM
0

I think I'll pass on your mental gymnastics. PS: Read a book . You might find better material than random shoddy blog posts
/r/TheRedPill11/02/13 07:34 PM
0

This is really bad. For so many reasons (mostly involving poor knowledge of genetics,psychology, philosophy and considering the lack of understanding of what a corollary is - deductive reasoning).Since I do not have the energy right now to tear down the framework itself , I will make a few points from within the framework to hopefully cast a few seeds of doubt in the minds of the reader that will lead them away from this drivel. Our genes seek to reproduce themselves. How? What do you mean seek?…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/13 05:45 AM
1

Got it. Reddit makes my sarcasm detector all wonky sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/13 07:12 AM
2

Even if it is his past talking to his present, its still an allegory.Those are what allegories are.Its just what the narrative is called.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/13 05:24 AM
1

Well I don't think it was meant to be taken as fact, it was just a less than stellar allegory .
/r/TheRedPill28/01/13 05:12 AM
1

Wonder what the girl did to get him.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/13 04:00 AM
1

Whoops...missed that one.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/13 05:26 PM
8

More gold from Bill Burr : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyZ9ss-bCUY Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtescsaREC0
/r/TheRedPill14/01/13 03:09 AM
5

More valuable insight less self congratulatory circlejerk bait. If you don't mind.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/13 03:20 AM
2

I didn't miss it .What he said is true, we need to analyze motivations. My argument is not in opposition to what he said but rather in addition to what he said. English is not my native language so maybe I haven't been very clear. Or maybe because I'm criticizing roosh people are assuming that I'm saying it is ok to listen to a woman.I am not.I am only saying that this was a weak article because when it comes to this specific topic, the line should be unbiased skepticism , irrespective of who is…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/13 06:49 PM
1

Well I'm not asking you to trust me blindly , I did provide an analysis in the first post which has everything to do with my area of expertise but nevertheless since I cannot prove that any consensus exists w.r.t my views I will withdraw that statement and ask that you do not trust me at all. Also , I never claimed anywhere that you rely too much on anecdotal evidence I clearly said that I was overlooking the fact that it was anecdotal evidence.I did this because if someone has a count of women …
/r/TheRedPill10/01/13 05:59 PM
4

A side note: You mentioned anecdote shaming.Thousands of woman or even hundreds is not really an anecdote, its significant. So I wouldn't focus too much on that.I think a bigger problem is selection bias which is basically is your sample of women variable enough to be generalized to the whole world? the whole of US? City girls? Girls with tons of issues? I think a lot of the backlash in this subreddit is centered around the claim that the women you date are substandard girls with low self esteem…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 10:16 PM
1

Fair enough. I don't know if you've read this but tell me what you think : http://lesswrong.com/lw/63i/rational_romantic_relationships_part_1/
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 09:38 PM
5

Don't get me wrong, this subreddit is incredibly important. People need to wake up. But since a lot of the theories are derived from reverse engineering success or personal experiences, we need to be very careful. The problem is not in recognizing patterns because they do exist in plenty. The problem is in determining causality ,association, and the strength of the association and then coming up with a protocol that is repeatable no matter who the actor/agent is. It's like trying to figure out w…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 09:31 PM
4

Hi, I'm not targetting you or anything butsince you're a mod you should read this - http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1695i4/never_listen_to_a_woman/c7u0slg
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 09:21 PM
12

Damn down-votes...so much for rediquette guys, seriously. I'm an epidemiologist , I work on clinical trials, I study biases and hypotheses testing on a daily basis.Even if we overlook the fact that this is all anecdotal evidence, what roosh did in the article can be called a differential misclassification of the outcome.It is a kind of Information bias.If we model gender as a risk factor or exposure( so female is the exposed group and male is the control group) and spouting bullshit as the outco…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 09:13 PM
0

Well at first glance this seems like a reasonable assumption.I will let you know if I think of something. I just have stricter criteria , personally which is- don't listen to anyone unless they have demonstrable expertise in what they're talking about. There are so many conflicting factors so its hard to determine the level of influence of each factor. From an evo-psych point of view , you are right..but feminism tells women they should be smart..so there is that internal struggle. Which is why …
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 08:32 PM
4

I think there is a misunderstanding here because what you just said doesnt seem to be related to my original point.I don't have any problems with "insulting" women if the "insult" is true and deserved. My point is that roosh in this article kind of contorted a universal phenomenon to fit the red pill narrative.My point was that when it comes to unsolicited bullshit opinions ..men truly are just as guilty...and it behooves us to warn readers to guard themselves against the bullshit PEOPLE in gene…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 08:14 PM
7

Dude what the fuck are you talking about? What pretty face? I actually read this subreddit everyday but by blindly stomping out any dissent you're actually alienating people who believe in the red pill and that there's something really wrong. A lot of people make a lot of good points but this article wasn't one of them. Now how about you actually respond with a rational argument instead of reacting emotionally like a typical woman.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 07:57 PM
5

I agree.This one was bad.He's shoehorning an us vs. them narrative where it isn't really appropriate.Superficial knowledge and lack of depth is an epidemic that is plaguing the entire world not just women. In fact it would be a lot more apt to say that you should only listen to people about things they're good at, either through real world experience or dedicated study. This is just common sense.I mean you shouldn't listen to bluepill guys for relationship advice either. And if you come across a…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 05:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter