TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wizzad Archive

View 0 posts and 179 comments by Wizzad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

OP's ass.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:25 PM
1

Calm down, Bob. Think of your blood pressure.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 02:16 PM
1

You just made me feel threatened, let me obliterate your jaw. It's just self-defense!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 03:21 AM
1

You're right, it's completely indefensible to say that he didn't fear for his life. He should have pulled out a gun and shot her, his life depended on it! Luckily the majority seems to have a more sane view of the situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 03:09 AM
1

Yea the "he feared for his life" fact, straight from the clip. Sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 03:08 AM
1

You did.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 01:58 AM
0

That's something other people claimed in response to me. I never said it was you. I'm always intellectually honest.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 01:46 AM
0

You did a few comments up. You don't know what a straw man is.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 01:30 AM
0

This is me acknowledging that you called the claims of life-threatening danger and the need for a threat to be neutralized silly.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 12:51 AM
1

The people whose claims I reiterated.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/16 12:02 AM
0

It would be silly if it wasn't so delusional. Who knows what they might try to harm people themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:59 PM
0

Those are actually just claims that I have gotten as responses. It's funny how you find them ridiculous as well. My statement is solid. The claims about neutralizing or self-defense are not. Luckily the majority is sane enough to agree with me here.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:55 PM
0

Clearly his life was in danger. Personally I would have opted for a quick shot to the girl's center mass to neutralize her. Perhaps if I still felt threatened I would have double tapped her in the head to make sure I'm safe.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:51 PM
2

You're being sarcastic, but if that really was your defense then I could see how that would make sense from your perspective. My problem is with these people who want to lie about it and act like it was self-defense. He was looking for trouble, he found some drunk people who were easily manipulated, he gave one a smack to feel good and he left the scene. If you're (not you) the kind of person who engages in such behavior or finds it acceptable then come out and be honest about it. Don't be sneak…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:49 PM
0

The ridiculousness is pretty self-evident. Not to you of course, but to others it is. I can't reason with you anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:05 PM
1

You don't want to stick to the facts and that's okay, but don't expect to convince anyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 11:04 PM
0

I pointed out that the argument is ridiculous. If you don't want to stick to the facts then so be it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:56 PM
0

A proof has to be convincing. Dishonesty is not very convincing, hence it's not a proof. He wanted to punch her and he did. The other people in this thread accept that but say that should be okay. You seem to be the only one claiming that his life was in danger.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:51 PM
1

Here's the facts: defend his life Sure, buddy. Of course he couldn't have defended his life by just walking away, or by not seeking the confrontation in the first place. He walked in looking for a fight, punched someone, and walked out.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:48 PM
1

Don't play dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:47 PM
1

You did not prove that.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:40 PM
1

Stop letting your assumptions run wild. Let's stick to the facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:37 PM
-5

The force was excessive. Let's stick to the facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:35 PM
0

I'm not excusing anything. He didn't do what needed to be done. He didn't need to use excessive force, he just wanted to.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:34 PM
–

The force was excessive. He didn't try just leaving, that's a lie. He could have easily walked out the door but he wanted to punch someone first.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 10:15 PM
-1

It was excessive.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 09:36 PM
1

It is the standard legal definition. His violence was excessive. He went far beyond what could have been a defensive measure.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 09:34 PM
0

It was not a defensive measure because he definitely used excessive force. It's incorrect to say that it was just a little bit excessive.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 09:01 PM
–

Just the standard definition of excessive.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 08:44 PM
2

And I'm saying that what he did was not a defensive measure because he used excessive force.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 08:34 PM
1

That's not exactly what he did. Watch the clip again. My position is solid, yours is denial.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 08:33 PM
–

You don't fully understand though. Go look up the terms and then watch the clip again. If you did fully understand then you wouldn't bother with power percentages as if we're talking about Dragon Ball Z.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 08:11 PM
–

What I'm saying is that it wasn't a defensive measure because excessive force was used. If you don't know what those terms mean then I encourage you to look them up.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 07:48 PM
–

That's a dumb interpretation of what happened. The force he used was excessive, hence it wasn't a defensive measure. It's lying by omission to refuse to mention this fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 07:24 PM
–

He technically wasn't defending himself against her as he went way beyond defensive measures.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 06:21 PM
14

Do you happen to have the data? My post was mostly based on news stories and anecdotes so I could definitely be wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 10:12 PM
105

Isn't it more like: Typically in heterosexual DV cases, regardless of circumstances, the male goes to jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 09:51 PM
1

It's regulation and anti-free market, as simple as that.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:22 PM
–

That's an argument against the free market not for the free market. Regulation against free movement of labor is anti-free market. What you're asking for is protectionism. lol downvoted for this
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:11 AM
2

His official campaign position is that global warming is a Chinese conspiracy. Of course he doesn't actually believe the bullshit, but he pretends to be a moron in order to appeal to morons. So was it a joke? No. He is very serious about spewing garbage to increase his popularity.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 06:00 PM
–

Because vaccines cause autism and global warming is a Chinese conspiracy. Haha, two Trump supporters got mad and downvoted me.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:38 AM
-2

I suspect that you are ignorant of the facts. If you want to learn more about Sweden without leaving the US, there are plenty of online sources that show that Sweden is not a totally anti-man country.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:25 PM
-2

Then to educate you: Sweden is not a totally anti-man country.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:09 PM
1

The only reason for that is because the US wants to get their hands on Assange. The trial in Sweden is just a sham. And it is an exaggeration that Sweden is a totally anti-man country. It is a false statement. I know it is popular on this sub to make up facts to boost an anti-feminism sentiment, but I can't take it seriously.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:45 PM
–

Sweden is not a totally anti-man country. You don't have to make such strong statements to make a point. When you use strong statements that aren't true it takes away from your message.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:45 AM
5

"Men are already fleeing at an extraordinary rate (from Sweden)." Source?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:42 PM
13

Well this is from my own experience. Perhaps you encountered something else. I also said that it isn't that black and white. edit: Rereading your comment, I'm not sure where you disagree with me. It seems we are saying the same thing? edit2: Just saw your new edit. I am not part of any men's rights activists group. I would be more inclined to be if they were more focused on action like feeding the hungry. That's what I like about Food Not Bombs, real action, real results. I do help out while bei…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:20 PM
21

It is important to note that this poster is from the punk scene. Most of the feminists that are being scolded (rightly so) on this sub for obscene remarks are from a very different school of thought than the more anarchist focused feminists. You can find anarchist feminists working at Food Not Bombs and similar organizations where they make food for the homeless men that are being neglected by the other kind of feminists. The situation isn't as black and white as I make it out to be in this comm…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:05 PM
2

Indeed it is not socialism. I don't have the time to type out a huge collection of ideologies at the moment. But to get the idea of what a socialist society might look like in its infancy you can watch this video. It would probably lead to a society which has some characteristics of Thomas More's Utopia without the hierarchal government and religious norms. But of course nobody really knows what a future society will look like. To get a quick idea of what Marx his ideas were on communism, there …
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:24 PM
1

Another leftist checking in! In my opinion you have 2 kinds of feminism: revolutionary feminists (our comrades) and bourgeois feminists. Revolutionary feminist women fought at the front of the Spanish Civil War alongside men. Revolutionary feminists fight for equality. Feminists who still fight for equality and those that you see volunteering at Food Not Bombs, at least in my experience. On the other hand you have bourgeois feminists. These are the people that want women at the top of the capita…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:23 AM
-3

Dumb people need socialism as a scapegoat, and to top it off they use Orwell (the revolutionary socialist) to justify it. Downvote the word socialism please. Makes this sub look idiotic.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:57 PM
7

It's funny that people don't know that Orwell fought for a society where workers control the means of production. In fact, they twist his ideas to oppose exactly that.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:29 AM
7

The idea that modern marriage is the same as marriage 2000 years ago (or even 300 years ago) is laughable. You should REALLY do some reading if you believe that the institution of marriage has stayed even remotely the same.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:46 PM
3

Well that's a pretty dumb way to protest. He will probably have to pay for the reparation of the painting. Also it's not really that clever.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:59 PM
7

?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:43 AM
10

guspe doesn't understand what happened in WW1, that is very obvious. edit: That doesn't mean you should downvote the comment till it's invisible...
/r/MensRights30/09/13 01:31 AM
1

I didn't elaborate enough in my comment but I have no problems with adults choosing to be circumcised or, like your brother, boys needing circumcision for medical reasons.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:05 PM
1

There are men and women who are in favor of circumcising boys, not just women. As for the ruling: go Deutschland! Sadly circumcision on babies is still not entirely illegal, but we're heading in the right direction. Hopefully your Dutch neighbors will be able to join you soon.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:32 AM
4

I think it was a joke referring to the OP.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:27 AM
5

And they would be wrong on both accounts.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:08 AM
1

Linked is dumb word to use. It is more than obvious that the recent money grab by the wealthy has caused poor people to commit suicide. A Greek man who committed suicide left a note which can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimitris_Christoulas
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:14 PM
3

To turn this into a more productive thread: what can a man do to avoid prostate cancer? I'm assuming that smoking can give you all kinds of cancer, prostate cancer included. Is this correct? What kinds of food can a man eat to avoid getting prostate cancer? Any information on men's health is appreciated.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:43 AM
0

First of all, we are not assembling or attacking armies. Is the American army called the Democrats? Nazi is a term for the German National Socialist party. The German army, which the American army fought during ww2, is called the Wehrmacht. Still I rest my case that sectarianism is useless and labels don't matter as much as actual goals.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:34 PM
2

There are Nazis who are not represented by Hitler quotes though, like the Strasserists. There are also feminists who are not represented by these man-hating quotes. Ideologies can be diverse. In America there were people in favor of the abolition of slavery because they thought it conflicted with their Christian faith. At the same time the proponents of slavery claimed that slavery had a biblical foundation and should be legal. It is of importance to recognize that some people have similar aims …
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:45 PM
1

Why is there a lack of similar rallies targeting women?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:21 AM
2

"Way to turn your back on little boys and defend their female rapists!" Boys can also be raped by men. Luckily I haven't had to experience it, but this subreddit should be as inclusive as possible in order to recognize all victims.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:58 PM
1

"Yes, but this is a rally called "Men's March Against Sexual Assault". The people holding the signs are men." But you will never see a rally called 'Women's March Against Sexual Assault' which focuses on rape perpetrated by females. It is very effective propaganda. They don't really deny rape by females (although number 1 makes that debatable) but they will never explicitly state that rape is perpetrated by females as well. If you think that it is a coincidence that this is a rally of men agains…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:44 PM
2

Google bases its search results on both popularity and your browsing history. When I search the same terms, I don't get those suggestions.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:21 AM
1

I study at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, I could check the database, be right back. edit: C Veraart, Valse zeden: onterechte aangiften in zedenzaken (2003) Factsheet : huiselijk geweld: feiten en cijfers (2006) (These are the names of the reports.)
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:14 AM
2

Good luck. Don't forget to post here when you find something interesting.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:11 AM
3

Veel succes. Vergeet niet hier te posten of stuur mij een berichtje als je iets interessants vindt.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:16 PM
2

Provide a source here?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:38 PM
11

Almost every person is self centered, you and me included. The problem is not that people are self centered, the problem is that being self centered is enough to get a conviction. There needs to be another requirement for putting people in jail besides going to the police.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:19 PM
1

I'm not sure how she would be able to collect child support. "Ultimately, Kelley decided to have the child, who was born severely disabled and lives with adoptive parents in the Midwest." If the child was given away for adoption surely there is no reason for child support? Maybe that's why there was no mention? Also the top comment on the article describes my view on this: " She signed a contract to abort if the parents decide to it was not her child. If she was so morally against it - don't sig…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:43 AM
-9

In the history of mankind, all authority has been abusive only limited by the power it had. From slavery to burning non-Catholics to slavery again, and now racist neocolonialism. They treat women like house slaves and men like expendable soldiers/workers. Anarchism is our only option to free ourselves.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:16 PM
10

Not to mention circumcision itself can kill babies or at least send them into shock.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:53 PM
1

Early revolutionary feminists were socialists. Just look at Rosa Luxemburg.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:59 PM
1

You definitely did not read any Marxist authors, you are misrepresenting their ideas.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:57 PM
1

I think there are multiple kinds of feminism. Just like there are communist Muslims who will praise Muhammad as some proto-communist when a wave of revolutions starts, there are reactionary Muslims who believe in Islamic banking, gender roles and subordination. There are feminists like Emma Goldman, Clara Zetkin, Rosa Luxemburg and there are also bourgeois feminists who believe in women at the top of the capitalist pyramid.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:56 PM
1

It is violence and sexist to physically constrain someone based on their genitalia. If people are more gentle towards you than towards others, then you are better off. You can spin it all you want but the reality is that some do get roughened up and some don't. That is not hatred towards the people who are treated more courteous.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:35 PM
1

Then your definition of misogyny is off. Misogyny means the hatred of women, if you feel the need to protect them instead of hurting them, it's not misogyny. Positive discrimination is not synonymous with hatred. It would have been misogyny if there was a rule that only women get constrained, which is not the case.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:55 PM
1

We shouldn't blame the false accuser for this man's lost years. The problem is that systemically the justice system gets things wrong. People should be able to be falsely accused and be 99.99% certain that they won't end up in jail. The justice system should be better at discriminating between the guilty and the not-guilty.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:34 PM
1

How is it misogyny if they don't constrain women, but they do constrain men. That sounds more like hatred of men than hatred of women.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:50 PM
1

Children still die and go into a paralyzing shock because of it, even because of the ones performed at a hospital.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:24 AM
2

"everything in my experience tells me it's a relatively minor issue" Do some research. Children die because of it.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:06 AM
1

Well then it might disappoint you that "Elmwood Park Police Chief Frank Fagiano would only say an officer was investigated and disciplined" = cop got told to be more subtle and continues the harassment.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:34 PM
4

If you care for your children and work hard for them, you are a great dad. And don't let anyone tell you otherwise! :)
/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:24 PM
6

There is no shame in dad asking mom for a little bit of help. Granted I do think the wording of the author is a bit off "Because he will call his dad for answers, and his dad will secretly come and ask you." but there is no reason to disregard the whole article for that one sentence.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:48 PM
3

Welcome to the party, comrade!
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:38 PM
2

You mind expanding on your source a bit? Post screenshots, etc...
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:31 AM
1

It's all nonsense. The government of the United States is not the vanguard of the communist movement. The author is making stuff up as he goes. If you want any more information that this person is a hack, just look at the sidebar, it's filled with conspiracy theories. In order to believe this article, you have to take the author's word for most of the 'facts'.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:17 PM
1

There are multiple kinds of feminism. The one that is blatantly anti-male is the bourgeois feminism. They want more women at the top of the capitalist pyramid, they want to distribute money to women to boost consumption, they want more competition in the workforce making it easier for the capitalist class to exploit workers and they want a stronger state that supports the prison industry. The idea that communists support any of that is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:12 PM
1

Yes of course more competition between workers is a communist idea! It can't be the case that it drives wages down for capitalists, right? It's not as if capitalists are in complete control of policy making, right? "Using the false pretext of public safety, we must ban guns so that the people can be easily dominated and any potential rebellion can be crushed by our Homeland Security agents." Yeah cause the United States government is the vanguard of the communist movement... The author of the ar…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:55 PM
1

Studying real biology books will give you a more thorough understanding of how everything works. Books = knowledge. It's possible to learn stuff through the Internet or by asking other people, but none of it is a replacement for well written books.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:05 PM
1

"Its the only human organ that's solely for pleasure." You just read that on the front page, it's not entirely true though. A human baby develops everything necessary to become both genders. Then when 1 gender is 'chosen', all of the parts develop fully to that of the chosen gender. A clitoris is the outcome of the neutral organ that could have been both a penis and a clitoris. So it's not for pleasure, it's for the development of the baby. At least that's how I understand it. I could be wrong t…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:04 PM
1

What the other 2 posters here already said: the author clearly has no understanding of Marxism.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:24 PM
3

How true is this? “And I would remind anyone considering making a false report to think again. We carry out extremely thorough and in-depth investigations and their lies will be exposed.”
/r/MensRights27/01/13 01:16 PM
13

The problem is not 'bitchiness' or her criminal act. That's what humans do. People are fucked up. The problem is that, most of the time, the state can't deal with these matters to reach a conclusion that we could call justice.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:17 PM
72

"The judge told her: 'It's a complete pack of lies. It may only have been for a short period of time, but you have destroyed an innocent life." Well he's going to give her one hell of a sentence! Destroying an innocent life, what a terrible thing to be charged and proven guilty with! "She wiped away tears as Recorder Shaun Smith QC sent her to prison for two years after she admitted the offence." Oh. What other offenses that 'destroy an innocent life' gives you 2 years in jail? The problem is no…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:14 PM
105

ICH SAGE EUCH, ES GIBT KEIN ÜBERMENSCH!
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:09 AM
2

Actually it means that you are still responsible for your actions even when drunk. You having sex with someone while drunk is you being responsible for the sex, not the person you slept with.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:33 PM
3

I'm sure that's what LeftoNhahe implied.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:41 PM
1

Yeah I'm sure the Naxalites are loaded...
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:25 AM
4

I posted this in a different thread: Patriarchy is a system where the father of the household is the one who makes all of the decisions, he is the patriarch. All of societies decisions are made by a group of influential families (the patriarchs of those families). There is no real invasive government because the patriarchs themselves are the government. The families are extremely large and refer to more people than just the biological family. The patriarch of the highest family has different pat…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:34 PM
-3

Please don't upvote this. It is a stupid magazine that has nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:03 PM
0

In the olden days? The law was implemented in 2000!
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:46 PM
3

Arson and burglary? What about attempted murder?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:02 PM
1

There were very socialist early feminists. Heroines such as Emma Goldman, Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:09 AM
1

Elaborate?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:17 AM
5

"Battering in same-sex intimate relationships has many of the same characteristics of battering in heterosexual relationships, but happens within the context of the larger societal oppression of same-sex couples." http://www.theduluthmodel.org/about/faqs.html What is that even supposed to mean? How does homophobia affect violence between homosexuals? Why is the Delusion Model afraid to talk about violence between homosexual men and women?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:17 PM
–

You should probably take your nonsense elsewhere.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:41 PM
1

TBH the incentives that will result from that will cause a real fucked up justice system. You could file charges for rape on day 1 and admit false accusation on day 2. Also real rapists might go free because the victim is desperate for money. It seems like we just need a better way to deal with rape in the legal system. Just like with every other big crime, everyone should be a suspect. The victim might be lying, the accused might be guilty, anyone else might be helping/lying/whatever. The most …
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:13 PM
9

Well I use a different definition. Patriarchy is a system where the father of the household is the one who makes all of the decisions, he is the patriarch. All of societies decisions are made by a group of influential families (the patriarchs of those families). There is no real invasive government because the patriarchs themselves are the government. The families are extremely large and refer to more people than just the biological family. The patriarch of the highest family has different patri…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:02 PM
7

Untrue. Misogynistic comments get downvoted.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:54 AM
3

Rapists with HIV will become far more deadly. Rapists without HIV are rapists. They are mentally unstable. I doubt a disease is going to stop them in their tracks. When they do get HIV, they will fall in category number 1. There are already prisons where there is no segregation. Rape happens there, so there is no proof for the view that no-segregation stops rape.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:07 PM
–

First post I read on the xpost: "her fears about men were completely justified". Good luck trying to reach a common ground.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:46 PM
3

.+ repost + has nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:04 PM
2

I didn't copy paste anything from him. I read his comment and his source to make my own comment, and I also mentioned both of my sources in my comment.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:36 PM
2

Thank you for your explanation.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:35 PM
2

Thank you for the information. Most people who I talk to in real life define sex as acts that directly stimulate the genitals, so this includes oral, stimulation by hands, etc. Also when discussing the Clinton affair in school some years ago, my teacher had to explain the phrase "I did not have sexual relations with that woman", since me and most of my peers define sex as I described above. Out of interest, where are you from? I am from the Netherlands myself.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:25 PM
–

Not an American myself, but I've noticed that in most American circles, sex refers to PIV penetration, all other acts are merely foreplay and do not count as actual sex.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:52 PM
4

Being male or female does not implicate being more or less extremist or violent. Don't stereotype men and women please.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:31 PM
–

"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration," Is that quote real? Is that even legal to say for a judge? edit: It seems that the quote is not 'true' in the sense that the content of the quote on its own does not reflect the idea of the quote in context. The judge himself was asking why this case was any different from the same situation with the genders reversed. www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/145np6/so_this_is_equality/c7a6ndo …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:27 PM
1

Of course this sub can serve as a listening ear, but you will probably receive more useful responses by posting here: http://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:24 PM
0

The system was designed to be like that.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:59 AM
1

Where are they getting this data from? Where is the source?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:22 PM
–

OMG WHY DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT MEN. THIS WOMAN WAS MIND RAPED BY PATRIATHAEFefafnaekgnkajgnejkagnkajgnjkae /s Yeah it's pretty interesting how men and women get treated in the media. The fun(?) part is that you don't even notice it if you are unaware of the situation.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:22 PM
3

Just a few moments ago you said that you were in favor of the current legal system and its implications! Glad to see you are changing your mind already about how reality should function. Now on to the solutions, what can we do to get from situation A where we are now, to situation B where there is less legal injustice?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:27 PM
3

You can't talk about righteousness if you support the jailing of fathers who cannot pay child support, if you are sexist, if you are anti-choice.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:17 PM
3

You are in no position to demand anything. You are morally bankrupt and you support a failing legal system.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:13 PM
5

Read some threads about possible male choice after conception on this forum. Tip: it does not involve being able to cut into a woman's stomach against her wishes.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:12 PM
7

Yes and because of the legal system, fathers get put into jail for not being able to pay child support. You support a legal system that fails.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:06 PM
5

So you're anti-choice after the act. Good to know.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:04 PM
5

You're not reasonable. A discussion is only reasonable when both parties are reasonable. So it is impossible for me to keep it reasonable.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:03 PM
3

Of course I meant that men should have a legal right to go at it with a clothes hanger. /s Use your brains dumb ass. This isn't hard.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:00 PM
4

Calling me a bitch? Nice. It's not being called responsible for your actions. You're just dumb.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:58 PM
5

Forcing responsibility on others gives you a thrill? You like seeing people in jail for not being able to pay child support?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:53 PM
4

Exactly. All of the choices that women get after conception does not bother me at all. However I would appreciate it if men got a choice after as well, which the OP doesn't seem to want.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:51 PM
5

"If you don't want a kid you probably shouldn't be having sex." IE anti-choice. Face it, people are going to have sex. Probably at ages at which they can't carry the responsibility of having a child which makes sex with choice afterwards necessary, or they simply don't want a child at all which makes sex with choice afterwards something positive. I don't want to pay the consequences and why should I? Because you think you have some moral superiority? Society would function better if people are a…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:44 PM
1

English is not my main language, so I could have made a mistake in naming my thoughts. However in the most basic form of logic, a reasoning is either valid or not valid. A reasoning is not valid if you can find an example where the premise is true and the conclusion is untrue. If you cannot find this example (because the premise is a contradiction or the conclusion is a tautology) then the reasoning must be logically valid. Note that I did not talk about what the premise or the conclusion contai…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:27 PM
5

So you are anti-choice?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:19 PM
1

Well that depends. A reasoning is logically valid unless you can find an example where the premise is true and the conclusion is untrue. If the premise is a contradiction, then the premise is never true, so the reasoning is valid. Please note that the reasoning being logically valid or not does not take into account what the person is actually saying. You could say: the sky is entirely blue, the sky is entirely yellow, so I'm wearing a hat. This is valid because the premise of the sky being both…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:11 PM
1

Was she actually a feminist? Is there any available information on the teacher?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:59 PM
–

"a women's only hair salon because I don't think there are any cases where men have been denied services at one" This guy should go to the mental Olympics. By definition WOMEN ONLY excludes men. Oh well...
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:40 PM
–

Let's talk about that. Why isn't a man able to feel threatened in any space? Is it because men truly have nothing to fear, or is it because men are conditioned to not tell anyone else or even themselves that they are afraid. And more importantly, why does nobody talk about this? It almost seems like there should exist some place where men can just talk about being men in this society. A sort of haven for men where social pressure doesn't exist so men can redefine what it means for them to be a m…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:37 PM
2

So what exactly was this about?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:41 PM
–

Honestly it's urban dictionary. People post/vote there to troll other people.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:18 PM
1

Is this guy a notorious liar? He certainly misrepresented this story on purpose. I remember watching a video from him a long time ago, where he claimed that because you can overdose on water, the word toxic is void and useless.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:05 PM
2

If you read the source, there will be separate toilets for men that urinate while standing. You still get to pee in whichever way you like. The title of this thread and the content of the video are misleading.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:59 PM
2

"a separate set of toilets clearly labeled for stand-up urination only" Doesn't seem like a bad idea. Would probably be more hygienic for men who choose to urinate sitting down, as there still are some men who don't place the seat up when urinating standing up. Also the title and the content of the video are misleading. If there is an option of urinating while standing, it is obvious that the legislation is not aimed at outlawing urinating while standing.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:58 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:04 PM
–

Yeah big fun being from Northwestern Europe and getting to be enslaved by Romans, or living in Southern Europe and getting enslaved by Ottomans/corsairs from the Barbary Coast. Hell even today there are a lot of whites living in poverty.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:35 PM
2

Yeah 2 seconds after I posted that, I reazlied that it might have been a joke. Oh well, have an upvote.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:53 PM
1

No need to generalize all females, especially in a subreddit dedicated to combat gender roles/stereotypes. edit: my apologies if you were joking edit2: He was joking, see below. Now I feel dumb. :(
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:04 PM
–

Of course it is Marx who dominates the thought of society, that's why there is no consumerism, divorcing for money, capital, wars for money and exploitation, right? RIGHT???
/r/MensRights04/11/12 10:56 PM
2

no
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:39 PM
3

Except that it has nothing to do with smoking weed.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:47 PM
–

On what basis do you conclude that all modern institutions are influenced by Marxist thought?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:23 PM
1

Except that to an imperialist state, both look 18. And even if the footage leaks out to the public, and it's very clear that the boy is not even close to being 16, people just don't care.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:28 PM
1

"(2) women like ads that attack and humiliate men" Is this really true? Does an overwhelming majority of women enjoy seeing men getting humiliated in ads?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:49 PM
4

Exactly. This shouldn't be in the MRA sub in my opinion.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:29 AM
1

I agree with you for 90%. There really are 2 underlying questions, and they should be answered independently. I also agree with basically your yes on 1, and no on 2. However I think at number 2 it is much less of a female conspiracy ("has its roots in the attempt by women to exploit their sexual power, dependent as it is on male shame"), and way more about our culture simply being fucked up, with no real organized and self identified force to keep it that way. As men's rights activists it should…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:55 PM
–

This is simply not true. Some men have really high sex drives, some men have really low sex drives, some men are asexual. Some women have really high sex drives, some women have really low sex drives, some women are asexual. But why consider that when we can also go by stereotypes?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:14 PM
3

" Government explicitly and vocally set out to help girls do better at school with various transformations to the education system." Could you elaborate on this claim? As in could you point to the specific changes (I assume the US) government made to make it easier for girls?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:29 PM
3

"Women who are more likely to be submissive and enjoy gender roles are less likely to initiate divorce. Women who are more assertive and dislike gender roles are more likely to initiate." How do you know that this is true?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:05 PM
4

Of course partners should support each other. However it seemed like the message in that comment is that women are supposed to do all of the housework etc, the classical 'take care' duties. Gender roles are an obstruction to men's rights, and should be opposed by us.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:45 PM
0

From the post: "It's our jobs to take care of our men." This is not what Men's Rights should be about. I thought people here wanted an equal society without the stereotypical 'a man should sacrifice himself on a sinking ship, a woman should stay at home and take care of her husband'. I think all of the people in the link have got it wrong.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:55 AM
5

Exactly!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:13 PM
8

"any female dominated society would be completely egalitarian" It's an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. A society that is dominated by a class, race or any other kind of group is by definition not egalitarian.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:12 PM
3

Just wanted to say that this misrepresents communism. Lenin explains it best in my opinion: 'According to Engels, the bourgeois state does not “wither away", but is “abolished” by the proletariat in the course of the revolution. What withers away after this revolution is the proletarian state or semi-state.' http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ A possible future communistic society is stateless.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:06 PM
2

Can someone find the source for that statistic?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:49 PM
3

But there is a difference between abortion and murder, and the effects of outlawing them is different. I'd say that they are pretty uncomparable overal.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:05 AM
1

nonsense
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:23 PM
-1

I agree that movements/currents/ideologies can be diverse, I already said so in my comments. Marx got mentioned because most revolutionary leftists are influenced in some way by Marx. Not only Marxist-Leninists and Soviet fetishists read Marx. Left communists and most liberation theologists fall into the Marxist category. But also anarchists these days have more in common with Marxist thought than the ideas of Proudhon.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:48 PM
3

Completely imaginary take on economics? You mean you don't agree with some of the lefts economic proposals. You cite government stimulus, but there are also leftists who want to abolish the state (think Kropotkin, Spanish anarchists). If you scroll up, you can see that I mentioned liberation theology as a revolutionary ideology. So that's another nonsense point. Utopian vision of humanity? Not at all. Mythological icons is not something inherent in leftism. Reagan is hailed as a free market supe…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:56 PM
–

Luckily leftism is not a religion. :) edit: downvoted? So I guess leftism IS a religion???? :/
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:55 PM
4

Well that depends on the kind of feminism. Just like you have reactionary Christianity in the form of fascistic and monarchist churches, you also have revolutionary Christianity in the form of liberation theology. There is a leftist feminism, just look at Emma Goldman. There are also bourgeois feminists, who care for 'women at the top' of the capitalist pyramid.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:52 PM
3

There are plenty of leftists that oppose religious currents. The Breznevites glorify the USSR invasion of Afghanistan to oppose the US backed Muhadjeen. It is nonsense that leftists don't speak out against religious fundamentalism. However leftists are more opposed to xenophobia and capitalism than cultural backwardness. (but even on cultural backwardness people like Marx held very strong and condeming opinions)
/r/MensRights16/09/12 06:39 PM
1

Cultural Marxism has 2 meanings. It is an actual Marxist theory, based on the investigation of nationalism. It is also a slang term which nothing to do with culture or Marxism.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter