TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WizzleTizzleFizzle Archive

View 1 post and 34 comments by WizzleTizzleFizzle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Ah yes. When Marijuana legalization had the most signatures and Obama laughed it off saying "I don't know what that says about people on the internet..." I remember.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 05:30 PM
1

Adversity? What?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 02:45 PM
4

More like maybe I underestimated the T_D influence on the sub and had to reevaluate whether I still wanted to bother keeping up with it. I rarely ever post here, my leaving isn't going to knock over anyone's sand castle. Y'all would be fine.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 02:44 PM
-2

Seriously considered unsubscribing as soon as I read the title. Say yeah, I'd say it does.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:26 PM
2

Fair enough. In that situation standing may be the easier option than taking any chance of awkwardness or confrontation.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:32 AM
3

There are lots of scary stories out there that are extremely unlikely to happen. Not much different from women who fear sexual assault everywhere they go. Sure, it happens, but statistically you're pretty safe. So get over it and be a normal person. If, by some fluke, you do wind up the victim of a freak incident you'll find plenty of compassion from me. Till then, chill out.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:59 PM
5

That's exactly what a bot would say.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:41 PM
6

Can you imagine the uproar if someone penned an article with similar language discussing what it it means to be a woman? What role are they supposed to fit, what image should they present, how should they act towards men? How is it then women are told to break out of their traditional gender roles and do whatever they want with their lives, and men are being told to break out of their traditional gender roles so they can fit into a new one?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 05:30 PM
0

You can't have babies without sex (well, artificial insemination and such, but generally speaking...), so while sex doesn't ALWAYS equal babies, it's still seems like a pretty fair statement to me. No sex = no babies If we factor out the "no" we are left with sex = babies. It's simple algebra.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:30 AM
2

But I thought I was going to enjoy the movie, and in hindsight I kind of regret going to see it, and you should have seen that coming so it's your fault!
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:21 AM
6

Source? I've never heard this from anybody anywhere ever.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:22 AM
6

But he didn't say that. That's kind of the point, and why I agree it was a stupid thing to say. He basically told them to remain quiet and just hope for the best. The correct answer, regardless of gender, is to recognize your value and ask for better compensation. I wonder if his answer would have been similar if the question hadn't been gendered in the first place. As CEO he probably just doesn't want any of his employees to suddenly start demanding raises.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:00 PM
1

You gotta hover on it dude. Idk the actresses name in the movie I'm thinking of.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:10 AM
3

was it?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:42 AM
8

I thought Emma's speech, taken by itself, was really quite excellent. The group she's supporting falls a bit short though.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:36 PM
1

That's as far as I made it too. "Biological destiny". Holy shit.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:56 PM
4

I think 2-4601 was referring to her statement that my experience has taught me otherwise While telling you're you that you're only posting this [...] because your personal relationships with them have been shitty At least that's what stood out to me.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:43 PM
1

Yeah I agree. The tendency to become more anti-feminism than pro-MR is a problem. I had the same reaction to the post when I saw it, and was glad to see your comment at the top.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:46 PM
1

I didn't mean to imply that there was no need for a feminist movement there, overall I was in agreement with your post, just noting that when I looked into it a little (itty bitty tiny) bit they don't seem to be as "seriously repressed" as I initially thought.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:08 PM
2

I had the same reaction, "that seems like someplace that might actually benefit from a little bit of feminism." Upon looking though, Women in Thailand were among the first women in Asia who were granted the right to vote in 1932. They are underrepresented in Thai politics. Yingluck Shinawatra, a woman, has been Prime Minister since 2011. The roles of women in Thailand's national development has not yet been fully established. Factors that affect women's participation in the socio-economic field …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:37 PM
12

Yes. I've had this conversation with her before regarding harsher sentencing for men. It's not discrimination against men, it's that women are seen as weak.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:50 PM
1

It's also such a depressing show that after every episode I stop and ask myself why I'm still watching it. But I continue on.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:57 PM
2

I have mixed feelings about this issue. Obviously there is a double standard there, but is there really a good way to fix it? Where the end result isn't just a bunch of kids who have it worse off than they do currently? Serious question. Is there a way to balance things that doesn't ultimately result in more kids in worse situations, such as living in a poorer household, winding up in foster care, etc?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:06 PM
1

Except that Webster's definition of communism is : a way of organizing a society in which the government owns the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) and there is no privately owned property Still clever though, I gave ya an upvote.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:14 PM
3

I guess my point is that I feel there is plenty of momentum against FGM and nearly none against circumcision. Both are things that should be stopped, and I'd like to see a MGM taken a little more seriously, or at least included in the debate of whether or not it's acceptable to alter someone's body without their consent. Reading through the comments you seem pretty against indiscriminate circumcision at birth, which I think is the type that most people have a problem with. If you NEED to have it…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:28 AM
4

I'm not really expecting a meaningful debate based on your last line, so I'll try to keep this short and concise. First: Now at birth circumcision is something to be discussed but it doesn't have any drawbacks, yet FGM is usually done in harsh unsanitary conditions and leads severe scarring and loss of nerve endings, making sex less enjoyable. If you don't think that circumcision leaves scars and removes nerve endings, and that this would in turn make sex less enjoyable, then I don't think you h…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:30 AM
19

I almost got selected to be on a jury where a prostitute was claiming a john raped her. They had ATM footage of him getting cash out with her sitting in the car next to him. She claimed she changed her mind and gave him the money back but he proceeded to rape her. He was convicted and sentenced to nearly 20 years. Ain't nothin' fool proof these days. (In fairness he may have really been guilty, I was not privy to every detail of the case since I was cut at the last second.)
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:41 AM
6

Actually no. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if he didn't report that assault at the time it happened then any pictures of it aren't going to mean much. The police are likely to say something along the lines of "Those bruises could have come from anywhere, you should have called to report it when it happened." Source: Friend in a similar situation (genders reversed)
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:00 PM
4

Really I'd say this could be shitty for both sides, depending on the school's prerogative. It makes it easier for them crack down hard or sweep it under the rug, whichever is more convenient.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:33 AM
6

Cool. Didn't think you made an ass out or yourself, really. You not only expressed an unpopular opinion (for this subreddit), but were open to criticism of it. That got you more respect than I give to 90% of internet users.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:12 PM
6

Do you plan to reevaluate your stance on the issue, or are you content being biased?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:58 PM
6

I just have one very straightforward question for you. Agreed, many forms of FGM are more extensive with more effects than MGM. I won't dispute that. You're OK with MGM because it only removes a little piece of skin. The equivalent on a female would be removing the clitoral hood. Would you feel that this is also acceptable since it's just a little piece of skin? Smaller, even, than that which is removed from men? A simple yes/no would be fine. Just curious.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:01 PM
4

How nice for you.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:26 PM
2

Aren't there women who go years without having an orgasm through sex? And they still have it. So uh... apparently there's a point? There've been times I haven't finished too, but it doesn't make the act any less enjoyable... OK maybe slightly less enjoyable, but I don't think if I woke up one day without the ability to orgasm that I'd just stop having sex. Of course I'm not saying that makes FGM OK or anything like that, just pointing out that some women seem to find enjoyment in it without gett…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter