TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WokeTrash Archive

View 0 posts and 202 comments by WokeTrash on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The systemic sexism in academia being the fact that the majority of historical institutions were men only, and women weren't allowed to apply to study at them. But please do feel free to provide some examples of historical educational institutions that allowed men and women to study side by side. The few institutions that women could attend were women-only prep schools that limited curriculum to household management. In Europe in the last century, women were not allowed to keep their wages if th…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 08:05 PM
2

All women were ALLOWED to do was get married in many cases. With no feasible access to education, they couldn't financially support themselves, so ignoring the betrothals suggested would lead to a high risk of homelessness. Your clothing comparison is not at all logical: all men with funding had access to education, whereas only men who actually attended the military got free clothing. In both cases, women were denied access to both education and denied access to military service so would not be…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 07:53 PM
1

I would say that being banned from the majority of educational institutions in your country due to your gender definitely counts as "not allowed an education", the majority of things in life are not quantative absolutes, as you seem keen to be suggesting. They had to fight for any chance to become educated, as well as have the necessary funding that other male students had to have (which is why I will agree that there was and still is a classist system in place in education).
/r/MensRights29/11/22 07:47 PM
1

No one denies their existence, you're twisting words to suit your agenda: feminists claim that women weren't allowed an education and so praise these examples of famous women who managed to reach the tops of their fields despite the barriers in place to stop women studying. using Marie Curie as an example, she literally had to join a non-traditional learning institute (a floating university), as higher educational institutions of the time would not allow women to study. Regardless of whether a w…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:18 PM
1

I mean, those women showcased their intelligence in spite of the systemic sexism that surrounded them in academia and in the STEM fields. Let's not try to misuse their names and accomplishments here. You cannot compare the legal right to earn a wage and legally be allowed to keep it in peacetime, against conscription during tikes of war. They're apples and oranges. I 100% agree on your last point, up until recently it was only the wealthy who had real autonomy. And since the VAST VAST majority o…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:40 PM
0

My issue dude is that you keep saying you're wrong, but you aren't providing any sort of data, you're just spouting a load of words onto an anonymous forum and expecting people to believe you.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 10:04 AM
0

Yeah but you're still wrong dude.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:21 AM
2

Honestly how can you be so confidently incorrect? Fertility and risk of complications to fetal health increase in both genders with age. It's common knowledge. If you're so set in your opinion at least provide some data to back it up.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:17 AM
1

Uh huh, so the women who were bombed civilians in WW2, the women on the front lines in supply chains and nursing, the women working in the unsafe factories whilst men were at war, the women who asked to fight on the front lines but were told by men in power they weren't allowed to? Of course we can then look at the infanticide statistics throughout history and even today, and how skewed it is towards killing young girls, we can talk about how dangerous it was throughout history to be giving birt…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 04:00 PM
2

? I'm thin, white and 6/6/6. Huh, sounds mildly racist, cool okay. I've got nothing to show but a couple of first dates pre-covid that went nowhere. You've literally just admitted that you're average looking, you got first dates, and then once your dates got to know you over that date they decided to not date you further. Sounds to me like a problem with your personality, not an OLD/physical looks problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 08:14 PM
4

"Only among the lower classes did people marry consistently for reasons of love or sexual desire. In general, however, peasant marriages were not common, as there was little need for a formal exchange of property among the poor." source Only those in the upper classes used marriage as a tool to benefit the family. Most people (if they even bothered to marry) did it for love.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 10:21 PM
9

How is playing video games on the sofa all day classified as ambitious?? Like yeah sure if they were working part time and had a desk set up with a streaming channel then sure. But the majority of people who play video games don't do this, sooo.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 10:17 PM
1

By your logic, because a minority of Germans were nazis, we should hate germans. Just because a minority of feminists are "feminazis", doesn't mean they all are. Feminism is about gender equality, for any gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 09:10 PM
3

Ugh, your comment added no value.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:55 PM
1

Uh-huh, and when the ladies want to go out shopping or out for cocktails or to the spa, you all are there by their sides?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 10:52 PM
1

Just because everyone is using it doesn't mean it is correct to use in this context. Fertility (sperm count or egg viability) has nothing to do with this conversation. Fertility decline is physiological, not socialogical. The previous user wrote that the RP was linked to fertility decline. When I corrected this, you chimed in and said they meant childbirth. Either way, you're now agreeing with me that neither fertility nor childbirth is influenced by RP ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 06:03 PM
1

No. I think you might be getting conception rates and childbirth mixed up with fertility. A person will be fertile regardless of their ideologies mate. And I get your point in theory, except the vast majority of men aren't redpilled, yet we're still seeing a decline. Lack of financial stability and education are much more likely to be influencing childbirth decline than redpilled men. Childbirth rates are much more likely to be influenced by factors related to women, than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:30 PM
1

The other commenter is still incorrect: fertility or lack of is not linked to redpill/otherwise idealogy. And maybe next time write childbirth not fertility, as they aren't the same thing, as you've just explained. To be honest, redpill doesn't affect childbirth either, as inevitably it's women at the moment who have more control over their bodies and pregnancy and not many women are redpill so. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ but you're right that childbirth rates are likely more socialogical than environmental.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:31 PM
1

I want to downvote half your comments, and upvote the other half. Luckily I'm not allowed to downvote so you're coming out positive. Nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 12:23 PM
3

Fertility has nothing to do with redpill, wtf. A person will be fertile regardless of whatever social construct we believe in. Without researching it, I can only presume that declining fertility in both genders will be linked to pollutants in our environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 12:16 PM
1

You made it sound like the article gave that number, thats why I was questioning your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:31 AM
0

Ah, that website isn't available in the EU, rip. I mean, sounds you're cherry picking and making a lot of assumptions on that data too. If it says 40-50%, we can't really ignore that unless it gives an explicit breakdown of single parents stats influencing it? I mean, here in the UK, everyone gets child benefits, no matter their wage or tax bracket. So I couldn't comment. Also that subsidizing goes to the household, not to the individual parent, so the welfare inputs wouldn't influence their bre…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 08:37 PM
1

Yo I gotta ask, how's your life, do you get sass from the friends and fam about the GYOW lifestyle? Honest question but I don't want to jump into the subreddit about it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 02:36 PM
1

Awesome man, it would be great to get that 30% source for future debates.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 02:20 PM
9

Dude. DUDE. I got you bro Admittedly he comes across as misguided in the first episode, but after that he accuses her of cheating on him, and is overall quite mean to her. Idk man, you mail order a bride, you get what you get, of course you're likely to get culture shock and barriers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:22 PM
–

But did you see what he did with that mayo, I can't even 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:18 PM
–

Women on this subreddit talk all the time about not liking that stuff, are you just going to ignore those opinions because it doesn't fit into your preferred worldview?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 05:36 PM
7

Wtf dude. You had to make it weird with your second comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 05:26 PM
5

"Simply put, marriages were more likely to end in divorce when the wife was ill but not when the husband was ill. " Proven by multiple sources, but the specific quote was taken from here. Men are likely to bail on frail/ill wives, than women would with their husbands. So um that: No woman is giving you what a man give you Is bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:00 PM
1

I mean, I'm childfree so I wouldn't know or care, but many people chat shit about wanting a legacy, and Im assuming it's the perception of time passing that caused those thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 09:50 PM
2

No, the previous commenter wants to do a poll of women's opinions on partnership leadership, you're going to have to gasp talk to women to get an answer. Trying to play the whole "women don't know what they want" is just you trying to use a straw man to get out of asking women what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 01:32 PM
3

Cool, I assume you'll be running the poll on Twitter or Facebook, not on Reddit, since the demographic of Reddit is rather skewed. Also by running on Facebook it will allow us to filter our responses based on gender, as in this we'll be more curious on the answers from women. If we polled Reddit, with its demographic being skewed male we would have a lot of data points that would be "what we think women want" rather than "what women actually want".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:28 PM
5

28 is, in terms of perception, what many will consider to be our half life. The way we perceive time passing changes as we get older. For example, a year to a ten year old is a tenth of their life, whereas a year to a fifty year old is a blink. That why many see their thirties disappear so quickly. I wonder whether that perception shift has an impact on those suddenly wanting a legacy, of which the easiest legacy to produce is their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 09:48 AM
10

I think it's egotistical that you believe it's your 'duty' to carry in your genetic line.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 09:21 AM
1

"I never said it was easy, I just said it wasn't hard". Uh-huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 11:07 PM
1

And that audience building isn't work?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 11:06 PM
4

Embryo transfer is quite an invasive procedure to extract from the uterine lining. Not many would consent to that procedure. And I wouldn't blame them.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:49 AM
2

You're moaning online anonymously about men's health, but you aren't willing to do anything about it. I know what the truth is; men's mental health is in decline, and unsupported. But your comment on saying we should focus on men's health over women's via the use of the suicide statistic doesn't work, since when you account for attempts then the stats are pretty equal. We should be focusing on general mental health regardless of gender. But if you want to push explicitly for men's health then yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 04:05 PM
1

Talking with someone on an anonymous internet forum does not make an awareness campaign. Especially in one as polarising as this place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 10:02 PM
1

Then petition for it with your local council, set up a charity to push for misdiagnosis if you believe it's a big issue? Raise awareness, set up a rally, petition to local organisations. Actually do something. I believed the paternity leave rules in my workplace were poor so I joined their employee resource group to chase the contract changes. I did something. You can't expect change to happen without doing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 07:18 PM
1

Something can be technically correct but still misleading. There is no gendered weighting in suicide attempts, Which is the important statistic. Medical Help is not tailored to women, it's tailored to men. Literally so many studies and articles on it, so many in fact that there is even a Wikipedia article about the discrimination women face, that is fully sourced.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 06:41 PM
1

I don't disagree with you there, I just correcting you on your misleading statement on suicides. Men don't want to seek help, and when women do seek help, often the bias in medical text and trial means misdiagnosis or further harm is caused, especially since women are often not believed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 05:58 PM
1

I get your point, but I could turn around in response and say You just don't know how many male female suicide tries go unnoticed. Statistically, men are more successful at suicide, but the attempt stats tell a more balanced story. And we can only go off stats reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 03:18 PM
5

Women are just as likely to try and commit suicide as men are, you realise? Men are just better at choosing quicker methods. Women are more likely to OD which can be reversed, whereas men are more likely to use quicker methods (gun/hanging/tall building). Male mental health is extremely important, especially in the age of social media promoting stoicism. but your statement is misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:56 PM
1

Eeeeeh, both activities can't be described as cheating but are likely to make your partner uncomfortable, especially if deception is involved. I would say they are comparable. The emotional conversations with other guys could lead to cheating in real life. And watching porn could lead to cheating or hiring a prostitute as the watcher wants a more immersive experience? Idk man. If you're having to deceive, then there is obviously something wrong imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 09:12 AM
1

Condoms when used correctly do not reduce sensitivity to the extent that nothing is felt. If they do, then you may have a size too small (too tight on the shaft), or too large (bunching on the shaft allowing the condom to move along the shaft during thrusts). And reduced sensitivity is much more palatable than reducing your partner's physical and mental health, surely you agree? All other birth control methods have common side effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 06:22 PM
1

But you know what doesn't hurt at all? Using a condom.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 05:45 PM
6

How odd. I wear a pair of shorts and a crop top in the summer because it is sweaty hot outside, and I want some breeze on my skin. Yet you're saying I deserve to be objectified because sometimes a prostitute will wear similar clothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:00 PM
1

Pain is extremely common upon insertion, and complications are quite common. They are uncomfortable for the majority of women, but in many places it is the only option feasible due to its semi-permanence. Only 1% of American women and 8% of European women have used an IUD. Majority of users are from less developed countries, where being able to access (and cover the costs of) hormonal BC is less common.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:30 AM
1

It isn't about what is more or less common/expected, it's about the fact that it is the least intrusive option to stop pregnancy. Imagine if your partner said 'i don't like you wearing a condom, so I want you to have gel injected into your balls instead' or if she asked you to use the male hormonal contraceptive that's been trialed (the one with the same side effects that female BC has; depression, weight gain, libido impact). Do you not care about your partner at all in regards to the impacts o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:21 AM
1

Well, a selfish sex partner is a shit sex partner so enjoy that bad reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 08:21 PM
1

So either intrusive device, or hormonal birth control that will likely have a lasting mental or physical impact on their health? All because you can't be arsed to wear a rubber. Ew. Waiting for those gel ball injections to get approved so we can just jab the bf instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 07:40 PM
1

Just use a condom? Just as safe when used correctly, you'll know if it has failed and need to grab the morning after pill, and keeps you protected during the newer stage of the relationship. It also does not hurt to put on or take off, and is no way near as intrusive as the IUD. But regardless, none of these methods are 100% effective, and why would you want to trade in to that monthly fear whenever a period is late?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 04:53 PM
2

I'm having a hard time responding to you, because I appreciate that you want to take in the supportive role in the household, but I fear you don't understand the restrictions that come in place with this. When you don't earn money, you can often find yourself in a position of being 'kept', where you have no money to spend on your own hobbies, even buying a book or a phone can be considered too expensive when it's the partner having to earn that money for you. And the majority of women aren't val…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 04:50 PM
2

You'd trade the monthly chronic pain that are periods, plus the likely chronic pain associated with childbirth, so you can stay at home? Dude, get someone to hit you with their car, you can claim benefit and stay at home forever with the same effects. But you also should realise that the majority of couples cannot afford to live a comfortable life on just one wage. An existence on the breadline perhaps (if you balance the cost of childcare against shite wages), but not an enjoyable life, for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 09:55 PM
5

Oh yay, an intrusive device that hurts to insert and remove, that is well known for worsening menstrual cycles and causing damage to the uterine lining. Not to mention the allergic reactions that can occur from the metals they are made of. And of course, any of the above can further impact the already below 100% pregnancy prevention efficiency.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 09:51 PM
2

Really? You're telling me that once someone has a billion, after that they'll be doing anything else valuable to themselves or humanity by hoarding that money/asset? I'm not on about taxing doctors and bankers and engineers. If you can live a life of luxury on the passive interest that your assets generate, when you can afford to lobby and push for change for the masses with your wealth, then when I believe it should taxed. And the people who run and lobby the government ARE the rich people. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 09:47 PM
1

Um, yeah ofc, a rich person probably wouldn't want to think about the privilege they have from their money, I can't blame them? I earn above my national mean average but in comparison to the range average I am obviously extremely below. I am not expecting a cheque to be written with my name on it, but i do find issue with all of the social/governmental services being extremely underfunded when there are people Swarovski badazzling their cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 08:24 PM
2

Thanks! Let me know if you have any thoughts, agreeably or disagreeably? I feel like my ideology is proactive (eat the rich), but my actions are reactive (grass roots initiatives to get women and poc into stem, whilst trying to fight for better paternity leave).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 07:11 PM
1

I'm so confused? Men and women both have technical insight if it's one of the skills they choose to pursue?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 06:09 PM
1

This. #eattherich
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 05:59 PM
7

Trade with me pls, being able to pee standing up and no periods or pregnancy fears, hell yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 05:58 PM
10

I think it's hard when going into the nuances. You're right, as a point blank statement you are right, but in earnings and social status. Men of all race have the 'privilege' of safety in themselves (with women being generally less strong, more likely to be raped or sexually assaulted etc.), But men of non-white races have the issue of systemic racism in police forces that then puts them at risk, safety wise. Of course, in measuring women against men (in what this sub is about), you would logica…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 08:20 AM
10

"men built everything" because women weren't allowed to. Up until more recent times, women weren't allowed in most educational institutions that taught the necessary knowledge in engineering and architecture for civil projects. Also, be careful about your moon project since the vast majority of the coding for that was completed by women. Hardcore construction work requires a lot of strength; you will have some women join but the majority do not have the body strength to do so. That is just a bio…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 08:04 AM
1

I think all children are inherently selfish before they develop empathy, and I think it's very easy for boys to let this develop into a sense of selfishness that can trigger violent tendencies when they fail to recognise others sense of self. The reason I say it's easier for boys is because of the stereotypes we as a society encourage: the boys will be boys mentality, and the boys don't cry mentality both cause negative impacts. The former often used to excuse excessive rough play or cruelty, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 06:32 PM
2

I mean, rape and gendered violence occur across the whole of Europe my dude. There is not a single country free of it. Else we'd all be moving there!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 01:22 PM
3

I feel like the correct phrase here is Eat the Rich. Lower class men and women both had shit gender roles that coincided with working men to death and making women pop out as many babies as possible until they die of child birth complications. Upper class women admittedly also had it pretty shite up until recently (being treated as property). But it's easier to keep the classist status quo when you keep the [insert discriminatory characteristic here] arguing against each other. As long as a majo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 01:28 PM
1

Like, it's just so odd to have such cognitive dissonance between their opinions of themselves versus others. Either hold everyone (including the self) to the same standard, or hold noone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 11:22 PM
1

Omg if you want to date or find an LTR then don't use tindr. Tindr is LITERALLY designed to only match people based on looks. Thats like me running a study in The_Donald and concluding that all redditors must be racists. Women in general don't focus as much on looks (though they do play a factor, just not as big as is promoted here), but of course women on tindr judge by looks, there is nothing else to judge on pre-match.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:47 PM
1

Dude, IGF peptides are used as a substitute for steroids, similar metabolic effect. To the extent that they are classified in the same bracket and banned in all formalised sports as a doping method. It triggers an anabolic response just like doping steroids do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:30 PM
1

My "kicks in" comment is about birth defects, whilst my "starts to reduce" comments are in relation to fertility. Stop misquoting me it's cringe. Nothing screams uneducated more than you apparently not being able to read. Let me guess, now that you've attacked my name you'll start reading my previous comment history too and try to use that to attack me as well.?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:21 PM
1

Can you just not see how embarrassing your double standard is. A tad too "a rule for thee but not for me" don't you think? So when you cheat on your partner and you divorce at least you'll know it was all entirely your fault I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:13 PM
2

Okay dude you aren't promiscuous, but what's your n count? Because there's a difference between those two descriptors. Also where does it say in your data that women are more promiscuous, I'm curious? I didn't see that when reading your data. Also idk why you felt the need to bring politics into this, ngl weird and inaccurate but go off.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:28 PM
0

Omg you dummy! "A woman's fertility starts to reduce in her early 30s, and more so after the age of 35. At least read what you quote mate. It STARTS to reduce, which is exactly what I said? In your 20s pregnancy is around 85%, and that reduces slightly to 75% by late thirties. Well done, enjoy your red koolaid mate. Also nothing screams uneducated like using the word 'female' as a noun, rather than as a verb or adjective. Cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:25 PM
1

Like I told the other person it is a known fact the older the person is the more likely their child is to have birth defects and health problems from birth, I fixed it for you. Age related birth defects can be caused by the age of either parent, not just women you realise?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:20 PM
4

Wow okay so you agree that there isn't actually anything different between high n count women and high n count men, but proceed to argue that high n count women bad anyway. Your argument is that because we use a stereotyping insult to describe people, that it must be correct. When you don't like a woman you call her a slut. When you don't like a dude you call him a virgin. And no. I don't use either of those words. When I don't like a person, I call them a shithead, regardless of their gender. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:17 PM
2

The self delusion here is a little embarrassing but go off I guess. But - i am on some enhancement drugs which allow the juvenile growth of cells. Show me a 60yo woman comparable to my fitness and achivements. How can the average 60 year women be comparable when you've literally just admitted to either taking steroids or Viagra. Because if it isn't either of those, then someone is selling you snake oil.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:12 PM
-1

Noone was talking about the wall, we were talking about biology. And cool okay, everyone hits the fertility wall in their early forties, both men and women. Cool bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:10 PM
2

Higher taxes, restrictions on entry to some venues and participation in some events, a glass ceiling for your career I have never seen ANY of these mentioned nor in practice, which as my company has a large spread of both married and unmarried men I'd expect to. How is not being married a glass ceiling? No marriage = no kids = more dedicated to work, there is no way it's a glass ceiling. General stigma A nice solidly vague comment that doesn't mean anything. There is no general stigma to being u…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:05 PM
0

Are you serious, it is already a known fact that the older women decide to have children the child is more likely to have birth defects Yes, it's a well known fact that birth defects kick in as fertility decreases, aka in their forties same as men. Can you not read? "Biological clock" "epiphany phase" "wall" are all phrases made up from stereotypes, there is no evidence of these being accurate, once you disregard articles without any sort of data backing them up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 05:00 PM
3

Male high n count does not correlate with looks and status nearly as much as you think it does. It correlates with charisma. Also, noone is grossed out by virgins like you've written. That's not a thing. Your comment is a winding post of personal insecurity about your virginity, and the jealousy men feel about women having sex, just not with them. You then try to hide it behind the pseudoscience that is Evo bio, and you just come across as promoting a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:36 AM
3

Yes, and those studies are measuring both men and women. So I'm assuming you're also a virgin and don't want to have sex at all until marriage to ensure the strength of your marriage and reduce the chances of you cheating on your partner too?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:28 AM
1

You come to a debate forum, but don't want to debate? You do realise that's what providing the details is right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:26 AM
3

For fertility, late twenties is in no way too late . Very late thirties, early forties is when fertility in women (and also in men) starts to decline. Up to 40, and conceiving stats are around 75% in their first year (while it is around 85% for women in their twenties), so there isn't anything more than a negligible difference. And you've already agreed it isn't about looks. So what is it about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:24 AM
1

What are these penalities? I can't seems to think of a single penalty myself, but I'm not the right demographic to have out much thought in it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:15 AM
3

So the vast majority of my country (western Europe) don't use the internet outside of Facebook and checking the weather. Reddit, Twitter and other social media platforms are very much echo chambers of the minority. This place really does not portray my country, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:13 AM
5

Cool, so I'm assuming you also have a very low n-count too, else you're putting your future partner at risk for cheating on them. Since half of your studies are not measuring just women, but men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:10 AM
1

This!! I don't see a problem at all with people having preferences with who they have sex with, my only issues are when a. the double standards kick in (I want to have casual sex but then want to settle down with a virgin), or b. when folks start shaming others for their activities, n-counts or preferences. It's dumb. a human who also needs a deeper connection
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 10:05 AM
1

You don't need to know their numerical n count wtf. If they say they are low n, then they're low n. Jeez.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 09:58 AM
0

Literally up to the age of 40 and women aren't even struggling to conceive. The common metaphor of the biological clock is incorrect. And around the ages of 40 fertility in men starts to decline, just as it does in women. You'll obviously get outliers, but it's more obvious with older men as they date down (with younger fertile pre-40s women), whereas women are less likely to date men younger (more fertile) than them. So you'll see more examples of older father's than older mother's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 09:51 AM
1

And you're a bloke only for fucking, since it sounds like you're high-n count too (since you're able to classify between marriageable women and fucking women). So noone will want to marry you either. Hope you enjoyed your cunt carousel while it lasts my dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 09:43 AM
2

There is a massive difference between sleeping with multiple people, and the infidelity that comes with paternity concerns. The former is sleeping with people whilst not in a relationship (no problem), the latter is cheating on a partner (obviously bad). There is no correlation here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 09:37 AM
1

There's a difference between having a preference (which is fine), and then moaning / shaming other for their high-n count (not fine). Imagine if I said "I don't want to have sex with men because I'm a lesbian" versus "all men are disgusting and I don't why anyone would want to sleep with them". Can you see why the former statement is acceptable and the latter isn't? You're sounding like the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 09:34 AM
3

Johnny Depp situation is a hard one with then both filing abuse claims, but at the moment pre appeals, Depp is currently the abuser in that situation, and we have to trust in the courts decision as we don't have any evidence that those making the court decision didn't. Vic mignogna has two decades of allegations following him, and last I read the court had not ruled false allegation, so until the court rules that they isn't really an example. (RIP Edward Elric) Azari accepted the allegations aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 11:57 PM
3

Would be great to see some stats of false accusation records against overall accusations of rape. Any reports of celebrities being falsely accused and subsequently being cancelled would be great? Because this is a massive fear that I've never seen occur outside a few isolated cases. But I agree, people unfortunately suck. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 10:12 PM
10

So I guess since you're against the friend zone you're also against the fuckzone then? Women shouldn't lead on men for attention, and men shouldn't lead on women for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:09 PM
1

But they don't pull their weight, that's the point. They are still net receivers of taxes throughout their lifetimes, they are sponsored by the government through a shitload of helps, not even counting alimony and all that. And yet the flaunt their pretend "independence". Could I have some evidence sources of these statements please? You've just said that women receive more tax benefits than they earn?? And some evidence of women getting sponsored? (Can I get sponsored, please and thanks!)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 09:32 AM
2

We are not hired by managers, we are hired by HR teams, you realise? And any firing or redundancy is managed by them. And HR teams are usually majority female. So if anything the majority of employees are dependent on women. But my manager is female so I guess I don't have to worry anyway. But in honesty, my opinion is still that you are hired by an organisation, not a singular person. I guess your logic is based on some women saying 'i don't need a man' but you are purposefully misunderstanding…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 09:29 AM
5

Yeah but you aren't relying on your boss, you're not being paid by your boss? You're being paid by the company you work for. And even if the gender of your boss did matter, it's still a much better position for a woman to be in: if you don't like your job, or your boss, or the field of work, you can move and get another job relatively easily. It's a lot harder to do that in a marriage where you are fully financially dependent on the person 'paying' you, and also probably dependent on them for sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 04:32 PM
9

... this is such an odd stretch of a comment. Women in that position are relying on the company paying them and are protected by workers rights. Rather than getting pocket money from their husband? By your logic, if your manager was female, you would be reliant on a woman for support.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 01:44 PM
1

Could you give me a source that says women stayed at home and looked after the children whilst men went out and worked throughout history (like you've stated) please? What I've read in the past was that before the world wars, everyone worked with a more community and extended family based child care model, and post-war there was a push to get women out of the shrinking job market so the 1950s nuclear household model was pushed in media. I've also read that historically, ( at least pre-victorian …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 01:36 PM
1

Then write high value men, don't use cringe alpha slang. So you went to a school specialising in sports and then wondered why everyone is attracted to those playing sports? Dude if you went to art school, or drama school or any other field you'd find people being attracted to those at the school who perform at the peak of that specialism. Not rocket science. So in regards to your 'evolution' bs, women were hunting. Your info is outdated. But more importantly, even if men or women went out and hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 09:14 PM
3

Right okay let's talk about exporting culture: Height preference is cultural, not evolutionary. That's why Latin America and Asia don't care that much about height. Two massive continents of people there. For the rest of the world, the western European culture has been exported into those colonies (north america, africa, indo-subcontinent), generating a historical cultural preference that traditionally prefers taller men. You argued it was evolution, but then said a whole group of people (Latin …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:56 PM
1

So in an arranged marriage you have to suffer through sexual acts your partner's wants, even when you don't want them? So my husband in an arranged marriage is obligated to let me peg him because it's a sexual act I want to do then? In my opinion, you should always put yourself and your partner first individually, and do so before your relationship together. whereas here in the US, it's common for people to avoid relationship problems and basically reserve the right to be selfish while blaming t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:40 PM
1

So no primary anecdotal evidence of being in that bracket yourself, and no stats. Just secondary anecdotal evidence. Because I won't lie, of the couple's in my friendship circle, the women all earn more in their various brackets. But we're both on anecdotes here so it's hard to compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:20 PM
3

If it's evolutionary, then how come there is a whole continent mentioned in your previous comment that doesn't care about height? Sounds more like culture than evolution to me by your evidence given. Don't get me wrong, in terms of evolution pre civilisation, height (to an extent) probably was an important trait genetically. But in this day and age, not so much as other factors? The evolutionary pseudo science side of dating is not really backed up by any causation, as far as I've read via this …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:14 PM
2

No dig here just curious? What's your experience here? Have you been in all of these wealth brackets at a given time to be able to say this, or?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:00 PM
5

I love how a person from the UK says something, and you turn around and go "well actually" even though you don't live there yourself. My dude, wtf. The only important thing in UK dating is the pronunciation of scone and how you brew your tea. Some things cannot be compromised on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 10:58 PM
1

Yeah but you still haven't answered her. If a person is married to another person that they have no sexual attraction towards, are they obligated to have sex under the guises of [compromise in marriage][keeping the families happy]. In an arranged marriage it feels like if you are forced into a relationship with someone you aren't attracted to, you are then forced to have sex with them, or face social/financial backlash from the partner, families and community. Can you not understand how this is …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:16 AM
4

I'm sorry this happened to you my dude, and I'm sorry your community sucks at providing support. I hope you've got a better support group now. But during writing this I realised you wrote pears instead of peers, so also thanks for cheering me up by having unresponsive pears :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:05 AM
1

No, but can you agree that having similar time allocations for work and chores wil help bring equality to a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 05:34 PM
3

I think social time would count as leisure though? I kind of agree with you: social time = yes, definitely a good thing, but use of social media = a mixed bag. I guess like you say, playing half an hour of COD to relax is not a bad thing, but blasting an eight hour session every night probably isn't good if you're neglecting other responsibilities. Same with social media use. Another potential reduction on women's time is the time spent on hair and makeup that many women feel necessary for their…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 05:30 PM
1

We weren't talking of full scope of a relationship here, we were only talking of the expectations of work and chores. I think your comment is slightly bad faith there.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 05:21 PM
2

Noone wins in divorce except the lawyers. And the kids short term if they get double Christmas and birthday presents (I remember a friend of mine calling the present count a double lining when we were kids). Dude if your daughters or sons have any passing interest in STEM, get them going! Crystal growing kits, programming toys, work experiences when they get older! STEM jobs are interesting and pay well so definitely encourage them whenever possible! And I'm just not going to comment on your wif…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 05:08 PM
2

No I agree, I've tried to figure out the different by trawling the evidence, but cannot seem to figure it out. I know there is the debate of the emotional burden of house tasks (in a workplace you pay someone to manage tasks to be completed, whereas in the home one person usually ends up managing that as well as completing tasks themselves, and that is traditionally women. Fine with a SATM but not when both are working) which may end up taking up free time, but the stats really aren't clear. I p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:45 PM
1

My partner and I both work the same amount of hours each week, and we usually complete chores together whenever possible as it's more fun that way? We share some daily hobbies but differ in others, so we have a nice balance of time spent with each other and with friends (pre lockdown) What isnt equal about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:36 PM
3

As a person in western Europe, no I do not belong to the minority (which, as Reddit is western centric, allows me to be presumptuous about the demographic we are discussing). Most of the time, both people in a relationship have to work, and so you share the chores, and are equals in the relationship. You can't afford not to, without living a depressingly dull life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:33 PM
4

Dude I am with you for the majority of your experience, except I think it was important for your kids to know that women can provide for themselves. At the end of this, your wife sounded like she was being selfish and wanting the best of both worlds, which wasn't fair to you or the kids. You gave her the option for some in home help, and getting a part time job to get some independence, but she turned it down. But I think it's important for kids to know that you can be a stay at home mum or dad,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:57 PM
4

As a woman, in an equal relationship, I would have to say no, I don't believe you. Also reading your previous comments, sometimes you're a man, sometimes you're a woman, so either way I guess you're a troll or desperate to play devil's advocate?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:32 PM
2

Queue exhibit B: a study used by another gentlemen further up: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-6-time-in-work-and-leisure-patterns-by-gender-and-family-structure/ That literally says "men spend more time than women in leisure activities, which includes TV time, playing games, sports and a series of other activities.27 The gender gap in leisure is about five hours per week." Which shows that between work outside and inside the house, women work more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:06 PM
8

The source you gave literally says men have more leisure time than women do?? If men have more leisure time than women, it means they are working less than women, not more. That's not equality "men spend more time than women in leisure activities, which includes TV time, playing games, sports and a series of other activities.27 The gender gap in leisure is about five hours per week." - your source
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:56 PM
1

Whilst I can't comment on the 'physically' part of their statement, I can agree with the 'cultural' part. Many cultures from the indo-subcontinent can be rather patriarchal and sexist (or feel such pressure from their families, at least), and I know I wouldn't want to get involved with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:48 PM
0

Whilst I can't comment on the 'physically' part of their statement, I can agree with the 'cultural' part. Many cultures from the indo-subcontinent can be rather patriarchal and sexist (or feel such pressure from their families, at least), and I know I wouldn't want to get involved with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:47 PM
3

Dude noone here is trolling, your friend is likely a rapist. If someone says no, you need to stop what you're doing, and open up dialog with them. "If they say no four times, then he stops" is what you said right? Well if someone says no five times he'll stop because at that point he's like 'oh shit they actually mean it', but until that point he was still raping them or assaulting them you realise? But if someone ignored my first no and carried on, I might be scared to speak up again. Because t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 12:07 AM
1

I don't really understand your "humanism" is outside the context of sex. Humanism for me is about believing in the good in people, about looking after yourself first, but assuming positive intent and supporting your community. Think religious morals to an extent, but without the hell to discourage bad things. Treat your neighbour as you would wish to be treated I guess. I care about the lack of intimacy many men face, I find it upsetting that in our society men are discouraged from being physica…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 11:35 PM
1

I didn't redirect you, the gentlemen from Iran redirected the conversation, I responded to him, then you responded to me. So no, I didn't. Wow, trying to tell me how I think or feel. You're right noone forced me to care, noone had to force me to care as I already cared. Why wouldn't I care about the problems that the people around me (the people I love) face, regardless of their gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 10:07 PM
1

So you still haven't pointed out where I said I didn't care about men's problems? So you lied in your previous comment then. And at no point did I tell you to ignore your own problems either, again please feel free to quote otherwise - I merely said that redirecting our anger, our energy could be used to help those suffering human rights violations. You know, and I know, that you not getting sex is not comparable to the gender apartheid the other gentlemen mentions. If you're so salty about the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 08:17 PM
1

So because a few people on Reddit have opinions, it means everyone of their demographic on Reddit have the same opinion? That is a hot take. So since you're a man on Reddit, you must be black and simultaneously racist right? Because I've seen men be black and be racist on here. Okay I'm being a bit melodramatic. But as a humanist, I'd like to hope that someone would intervene. I know I've intervened when I've noticed a friend pawing at a guy before, but I guess as I was out with them at the time…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 08:09 PM
1

For the majority of people it is not virtue signalling, it's called showing empathy for a scenario. But because like you say, whilst there isn't much as individuals we can do about helping others abroad, we can still discuss and show empathy for them. But by the sounds of it you aren't capable of caring about others, so you probably can't understand why or how others can care. I guess if you see someone constantly posting on social media about injustice and never doing anything then fair enough.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 07:53 PM
1

When the fuck did I say I didn't care about men's problems?? Please point it out, fucking quote me where I said I don't care. Bearing in mind I'm not OP. I commented on a bloke commenting about coming from Iran who was talking about gender apartheid. I just thought it was a strong point he made that we talk about western problems and disregard those suffering much worse elsewhere. So don't project your emotions on the opposite gender onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 07:36 PM
0

"Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination." source being the UN website So actually, yes they are all included as human rights as defined by the UN, as I said. I never mentioned the Geneva convention. But you're right, you as a person are not obligated to protect anyone, but noone is asking to do that. I am sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 07:23 PM
2

Nah her OP is: some men have really unrealistic expectations of sex and relationships. Which they do. Tldr: if you watch social media romance and relationships, and porn; then your expectations are going to be unrealistic. But then instead of getting upset at media/porn you get upset at the women who won't have sex with you. A lot of men don't consume as much media, and they don't have unrealistic expectations, as she says in her comment. Albeit using crude (perhaps even inflammatory) language.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 06:00 PM
2

Wow, next thing you know you'll be saying food and shelter isn't a human right, and it's every person for themselves; all the while your parents probably claimed tax benefit for your existence, so you've already benefitted from a system that assumes protection is a human right. You probably went to school as education is also a human right, and if your parents would low income you will have received free school meals as nourishment is a human right. And if your country is a part of the UN, then …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 05:54 PM
2

Cool, cool, cool. What you've basically just told me is that you don't care about people's problems unless they directly affect or impact you. The logic is you're expecting women to care about your problems of not being able sex, but turn around and explicitly say you don't care about human rights violations because wahmen. Can you not see the hypocrisy? And yeah, having seen homeless people share food and bedding with strangers, I can say that if they had the chance/ability to help people in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 05:47 PM
1

In order to live a life worth living? You absolutely need sexual relations in order to feel fulfilled. So, since social needs require multiple people, a much more correct posit would be: "People need the social opportunity to have sex" because sex directly is not an entitlement but it is a right to have access to the chance to have sex. Asexuals have entered the chat, and would have to disagree. It is not a need. It is a want. Humans need social contact, whether that's with friends, with family …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 05:39 PM
3

Ooof, understandable. Thanks man for not getting salty with that!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 05:22 PM
3

I'd say most men have better things to do than obsess over pussy. Who cares about your opinion on this as a woman ? You wrote this comment at the top. You didn't write "who cares about your opinion as a psycho on the internet" you wrote "as a woman". Which makes me wonder whether you'd listen to any woman who's opinion contradicts yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 12:59 PM
4

I get that for sure (have your upvote), but you came to PPD, came into her post and start commenting, then get annoyed when you see her comments and advice. And your phrasing is "a woman", not "this woman" so it does make me wonder whether you're gonna be listening to the kinds of woman you wanna have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 12:21 PM
10

Sex isn't a need, the need you're thinking of is intimacy, or skin contact. Like many have said, our ancestors were very social creatures. But being social and needing intimacy don't mean sex. Physical contact via hugs and cuddling with family and friends more than cover this need. If a person is struggling for that, they need to work on their platonic relationships. We as a society need to work on why men don't hug their friends, or show positive emotions towards the people in their life they l…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:53 AM
4

Dude you're being a bit obtuse there. I know women who are catcalled and harassed (butt grabs, leering, being followed) on the daily. That's sexual harassment. Are you sexually harassed or targeted for your gender daily by gay men while walking to work, going to the gym, grabbing a coffee, doing the food shop, in a work meeting, on a lads night out, when going to the local football game? Pretty much everywhere is what I've heard from female friends. And after all that, you're expected to show em…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:44 AM
6

Man wants to have sex with women, does not want to listen to opinion of sex by women. You goofed man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:34 AM
5

Safety is a human right. Sex isn't. Yes, many have defined intimacy to be a 'need' historically, but a. Legally this is not so, b. Not all intimacy is sex, it can be defined platonically or with familial contact.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:18 AM
0

Damn, your comment has kind of giving me a sad thought: like you say, there are people literally suffering through a gender apartheid, and here we are moaning about not be able to get sex. Perhaps we should be redirecting the anger towards [what are probably] human rights violations in Iran.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:11 AM
1

I'd like to see some non-outdated sources from you that suggest this 'men are the hunters' opinion is still valid, as everything I've read in the last few years has disproved this opinion that only men were the hunters. In prehistoric nomadic communities, anyone who was not a child, and not pregnant/nursing would hunt and gather. Some info to backup what I'm saying: national geographic, I believe the paper that article was built off here, and a review of Distorting the Past.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 04:26 PM
2

I had a stroke reading your username, why do you hate vowels?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 03:03 PM
6

Same can be said for submissive men too. I think anyone who has a lot of responsibility in their career or elsewhere in their life may find an outlet in the freedom and lack of accountability that is the more submissive role in BDSM.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 07:18 PM
5

As you are the person who made the original statement that all women desired the child bearing role they were forced into, it's actually on you to provide source or proof that they desired it. And of course, before you say 'look at history, they didn't work, they had loads of children that's proof' rather than explicit studies that aim to identify the feelings of historical women, I want to point out that by using that 'history shows' logic, you could say that slaves enjoyed being slaves, else t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 09:42 AM
1

Dude just no. If you had said a male role model, I would've agreed with you, but a father is not necessary to raise a boy successfully. Imagine if I turned round and said a single father couldn't look after his daughter, because the mother wasn't in the picture. That would be dumb: grandparents, aunts, cousins and siblings could be in the picture but by your logic it's still a no. I don't understand why you think divorce rates are so much higher in the US than they are in whatever country you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 02:39 PM
1

Or let's reverse that around. Maybe since some women get to snipe up the nicer guys (no ™) during the early twenties, there are only the assholes left; so women feel like they have to settle for the assholes? So women have to skew their expectations lower and accept negative traits that they otherwise wouldn't. Don't get me wrong there is a tiny population of women who do enjoy dating the bad boy, but they're too busy starting relationships with people in prison to care about a bloke who's obnox…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 09:41 AM
4

You're getting awfully close to Nice Guys™ territory here. The majority of women don't like assholes, stop lying to yourself. What I have seen happen with friends, is that they'll start dating someone nice, a little clingy but overall kind, then once the relationship develops they start to get more clingy and possessive which then moves into asshole territory. But at that point my friend is emotionally invested in that person so it isn't that easy to cut ties.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 09:13 AM
2

Oh admittedly I just meant normal book series, I would likely watch YouTubers for chess tactics since I already passively watch their videos anyway! I am from Europe myself, so I can't comment too much on US internal affairs: but what I have heard of healthcare and education suggests improvement is necessary. I find it very odd that schooling is not kept secular. Would you not introduce a similar physical education system for women too? One thing I do like in Japan is their tax break system for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 01:02 PM
2

So you tell me that you're worried about dopamine rushes that video games provide, but then encourage the educated gambling that is playing the stock market? Bearing in mind that between 80-90% of people who buy positions in the stock market lose money?? And the problem is that bad that websites and apps have to provide that statistic throughout the registration process. For the majority of people it is not a productive hobby. Video games aren't killing those men in the far East, it's simply a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 11:58 AM
2

Yes but this post is a "I believe this, and this paper backs it up and it contains sources". A) he hasn't shared the paper nor his sources so we currently have no evidence to back up his statement anyway, and B) his evidence comes down to: 'the sky is green, and this paper says so' whilst not mentioning in the original post that he wrote that paper. Of course the paper is going to back up what he's saying, if he wrote it? I just think it's a tad disingenuous to use your own work as a source, esp…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 05:20 PM
1

Video games are NOT the reason why millennial and gen z earnings are down. Earnings are down because wages haven't watched inflation. And we'll have to agree to disagree, hobbies don't have to be economically productive to be considered a 'good hobby'. Also I gotta ask then, what your hobbies are to be taking such a high horse stance? You realise a good book can also trigger a chemical response right? And playing chess too, and boardgames with your family? Does that mean we should not have these…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 05:15 PM
1

If the sources are in your paper, why have you not just shared the sources??? Us reading the sources would not impact your paper then I'm so confused?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 05:10 PM
4

So your source is a paper you've written yourself? When using sources one needs to ensure unbias and reliability. By the fact you're in this subreddit, I would be very weary of presuming your paper is without bias. And by using your own paper, it would be very hard for you to review the paper for bias, as it will obviously be confirming your own. But I would still be curious to read it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 10:04 AM
2

Don't get me wrong, I know peoples who spend too much time playing video games. But what makes a video game different from a TV series, or a book? Or doing some knitting, or any of the hobbies that aren't really productive? A purpose of a hobby isn't to be a side hustle, it's to de-stress and unwind from the work that we do, it doesn't need to add financial value? I constantly get stuck in my mindsight that my hobbies should be financially productive, or be quaint enough to be socially beneficia…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 10:00 AM
3

Didn't you know, if a man has sex too much his dick slowly shrivels up and erodes from having too much sex, the minor acidity of all the vaginas he's had sex with will wear his dick away? So if there is any sort of wrinkle on their dick (when its either flaccid or hard) then you know they're a slut /s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 08:54 AM
1

In regards to your first comment I agree entirely. I believe men should step in yes, just as I believe that women should step in if a person is making a sexist joke towards a man (good lord do I hate the 'oh look, daddy is babysitting')(he is not babysitting do not demean his position as a father). If someone says something rude to another, then they think they are in the right and nothing the latter can say will truly change their opinion. But if another (third) person steps in (especially some…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:33 PM
1

Well, the stats further down say that 85% of the new cases seen in women were through heterosexual contact, so I'd assume that at least for every women in that bracket, there would be a man being told they have HIV since that's where the stats say they're getting it from? I wouldn't know in regards to the gender bias in medical checkups, everyone I knew (men and women) used to get tested pretty often at uni if they were having new sexual contact regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:19 PM
2

There's nothing to fix, I wrote 'for example gay men' so I don't understand what you're trying to say? People who are penetrated during sex are more at risk, due to those areas being more likely to trap bacteria. For every woman who catches a disease there is a man who is passing it on to her though? And you do realise Chlamydia can cause infertility in men too as well, and gonorrhoea too? You're just as at risk as a woman is. So your whole logic of severity of risk is bs. Look, shame women for …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:08 PM
7

I mean only 20% of HIV cases are women, so men are four times as likely to get HIV so your statement on women being more prone to STDs is misleading. We can all pull stats out but correlation is not causation. It's bring penetrated that puts a person at higher risk: so basically any person who has sex with someone who has a dick is at risk (women, gay men, etc.) If every sex act includes protective measures (which is a different conversation)(and lets be honest, women are likely to push for cond…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 02:20 PM
1

"By that logic women shouldn't wear provocative clothing if some men feel aroused by it. Surely you don't agree with that, right ?" And you must agree with men having to cover up their faces and bodies if they're ugly then, since ugly men make me and many others feel repulsed (an emotion that is usually considered the opposite of aroused)? My point being that you cannot compare safety, (which is considered a human right in most western countries regardless of gender) to emotions that can and sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 10:39 AM
3

Sourced from Gender Differences in patterns and trends in US Homicides Of overall homicides (1976-2017), 18.8% were female victims killed by men, whilst 2.0% were female victims killed by women. So women are over nine times more likely to be killed by a man, than a woman. From that, we can assume that women are safer around other women than they are around men, which was the claim of the redditor above you in the conversation chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 10:22 AM
1

Ah, it was aimed at the comment above you. Admittedly a very vague way of agreeing with you. The redditor having a sex dungeon is only (at most) tangentially related to he topic, it just sounds like they're trying to find an opportunity to say 'i have sex'.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 07:13 PM
2

"I have a lot of sex therefore my opinion must be right"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 12:22 PM
1

If you're writing smut, then you're probably reading smut. Definitely a porn addiction unfortunately for all us erotica readers. also I wanna know what you're writing I won't lie~
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 12:01 AM
1

Gosh three times a day, how do they even produce milk that quickly?? So how close are you to 28 days so far? But I do hope you don't break your record that doesn't sound like a healthy work schedule! You're so productive, I definitely take a lot more time for my hobbies than that. Do you have time for hobbies or? :O
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 01:36 PM
1

Why on earth would anyone choose the less comfortable route when it provides no benefit though? There is no financial benefit to choosing blue collar labour or more dangerous jobs when the office based STEM fields exist. If someone said to you, 100k a year pay either way, choose between a STEM office job or become a plumber, you'd go office work. Because it's more interesting, less tiring, less strain on the body, and probably comes with better job perks. Anybody would. So I'm struggling to see …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 02:52 AM
1

Hahaha, then I'll cross my fingers and toes in fortune for a speedy recovery! So are cows milked only at night or? I'm admit I'm now rather curious on 'the day in the life of' of yourself, if you can indulge me?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 02:30 AM
1

Also your flair is cute! Moo children! :D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 09:02 PM
1

Kudos to you, take an upvote for your hard work. Folks in manual labour, teaching and anyone raising children automatically get my respect. My well wishes for your colleagues surgery ~
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 09:02 PM
1

Tl;dr you're saying women don't know what men want (and this, to me sounds like a problem). Errr, what? Oh, ok. I guess. I mean, some do want me in particular, and some get to have me for a while. It's a fair trade kind of transaction, as I see it. Women and men, in general, though? Not sure. I don't know enough to know for sure, and the dynamic is,... well, dynamic. Kinda like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'll get. I said if women don't know what men want then this needs to be res…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 08:58 PM
1

You've never spoken to an elderly plumber if you think they don't end up with chronic health problems, knees especially. Also, dealing with shit = a major health risk in itself. So again, by your logic, Men are dumb for choosing high risk jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 08:48 PM
1

As I responded to another comment, the chronic negative impacts of trade jobs (knee and back problems the most common) are effects I would never recommend to anyone. And of course, dealing with literal shit brings its own health risks. You still haven't answered me as to why you care about people going into debt for a career, it doesn't impact you why do you care? And why does it matter whether people learn in a lecture hall or in their basement? Autism isn't a men only condition, female diagnos…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 08:46 PM
1

Why so bitter, says the bloke who attacked my dialect in his first response. You're the one who chose to take a personal shot first. Live by the sword, die by the sword. I shouldn't have to go trawling through your comments, in a normal conversation you wouldn't direct someone to a conversation you had last week. So I can only assume that men want for nothing since you haven't told me anything. I found out what the men in my professional environment wanted by asking them in a conversation and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 07:34 PM
2

Why don't you ask every experienced plumber / carpenter / electrician in their mid forties what their overall general health is like? The knee problems / back problems / hand problems associated in all of these blue collar trade jobs are not immediately visible, but are definitely insidious and chronic. Herniated discs, knee replacements, chronic hand numbness from electric shock. I certainly wouldn't choose that career path or myself or anyone I love. And the folks I know know certainly don't g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 07:23 PM
1

Yes but why would you go risk your life for six figures when you can get some training and not risk your life for six figures? You're blaming women for not filling the job deficit in these career fields, when you should be instead blaming those fields for having unsafe working conditions that exploit their (primarily male) workers. In regards to debt: firstly you don't have to go into debt to get into well paying STEM fields. But even if someone (whether male or female) chooses to go into debt, …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 07:20 PM
1

Well, I gave you the opportunity to correct your phrasing or explain your first paragraph, but instead you prefer to remain illiterate, that's fine by me. The original comment is asking why men expect women to solve men's problems, you then bring up "what men really want". I'm happy to get involved with men's problems, I've actively spent time working towards increased paternity and more flexible working for father's in my workplace. So I'm asking you, since You're saying men want sex and someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 07:13 PM
1

Mate I won't lie I am struggling to understand what you're trying to say in your first paragraph? But in your latter paragraph: why is it a woman's job to know what men really want? I get that you should know your BF, your husband, your dad, your brother: just as you should know your wife, GF, sister and mother. But why are you implying that it's a women's role to know nebulously what men want? Surely men can use their words and explain what they want, eh? Especially in the context of men helpin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 06:49 PM
8

You've literally just explained why Anyone would prefer to be a software engineer over other (more dangerous, physically demanding) jobs, then you moan that women want those jobs too?? No kid dreams of becoming a trawler fisherman for shite pay and terrible job perks. STEM is where the money is, most people have been conditioned from birth in this society to chase money. What do you expect to happen??
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 06:39 PM
1

I mean, the only women only classes I've seen are self defense classes, which I feel like I agree with, with it being a class with much physical contact that is taught for the safety of the learner, it isn't really a hobby. I've seen no exclusion in schools nor in hobby groups. The gym is a hard one, I know many girls feel unsafe using 24/7 gyms; but my main point comes back to: there are many gyms in a city. Women only classes do not stop the unisex classes from occurring. And if you want a men…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:32 PM
1

Okay so you were fortunate enough to not be bullied or isolated for the same traits that many of us were. Congrats, I guess? But yeah the race analogy does make sense, you're wanting to exclude someone from your group based on a characteristic they cannot control, rather than including them for having an interest in the groups purpose for meeting. And yes, It would be equally bad if a group of black kits set up a hobby group and excluded white kids. Just as you didn't have anyone to nerd with at…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 08:59 PM
3

So I just want to get this straight: your comment suggests that you may have been bullied or at least isolated from certain friendship groups because of an aspect of yourself you couldn't (and shouldn't have to) control. Your nerdiness. Enjoying video games, playing DnD, some light coding and programming, that kind of thing. But when female nerds want to join in your shared interests, it's a big no? Even though just as they (and you) can't control being interested in 'nerdy' hobbies, they too ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 07:16 PM
2

Not OP, but Trump is friendly with Russia.. you know, one of the largest nations States of the USSR before it disbanded?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:40 AM
1

You still haven't gotten any sources for me, how embarrassing. You're right in that I'll never be a ruler, but neither will you. But let's keep the masses fighting over gender and race, whilst those benefiting from the classism profit. Also genuinely curious here: you use the phrase 'men/women were selected to rule/be ruled'. Selected by who? What an odd statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 02:17 PM
1

So you don't provide evidence, just write an opinion that you want me to believe is factual just because you said so. Yet when I use an anecdote for an opinion you say it means nothing in a debate. So you're saying your whole argument means nothing since it's all opinion. A women's only disadvantage in leadership is having to deal with people like you undermining them. Everyone allows someone to lead them, we have free will and choice you Muppet. The difference is I base who I follow based on id…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 02:13 PM
1

You've raised no new points, and are having to lean on another users comment, that (unfortunately for your rhetoric) didn't 'school me'; if you had actually read their 'research' properly you'll find it either out of date or is actually backing up my argument. Their quotes are taken out of context in a woeful attempt to find logical evidence. If it's so obvious it should be sooo easy for you to find the evidence to back up your woollen opinions. But you cant, because your opinions are just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 11:05 PM
0

Your entrepreneur article summarises in its abstract that "Together, our results suggest that women’s disadvantages in leading their businesses may be perpetuated by gender beliefs that discount women’s leadership" which backs up my third link: that a woman's main disadvantage in leadership is that people will doubt her purely because of her gender, regardless of actual capability. So thanks for another paper. Why is my statement on CEO leadership wrong? Your CEO article is out of date, cringe, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 10:54 PM
1

Aww sounds like someone tried to Google it and couldn't find anything to back up their incorrect claims that "men are better at leadership and women are tyrannical". If you had a life you wouldn't be commenting in this sub with the rest of us,but nice try on lying to yourself. And it sounds like most of the successful countries (read: not America) have females in positions of power. Your logic of the real world showing otherwise id correlation not causation; Nepotism and the boys club rather tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 10:21 PM
1

Oh wow, one American leadership debate (heavily influenced by external geopolitical agenda to push for a more conservative party, with a presidential race that made the rest of the world cringe) does not make evidence. Many other countries have voted in women to lead; and oh, which countries have been considered to have had the best leadership during Covid-19? Oh, that would the ones with female leadership actually. Iceland, New Zealand and Finland have all had amazing Covid responses, and have …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 04:00 PM
2

you're either a troll or extremely delusional. I'm not even going to touch on most of what you have said: women are not projecting their tyrannical rule onto men. men and women are more likely seeing the dynamic from the previous generation: their fathers disrespect, name calling and cheating directed at their mothers. And either will copy it or break the cycle, regardless of gender. Also I love that your idea of a stay at home wife/husband at no point mentions the cleaning of the house (the mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 11:30 AM
1

My favourite comment of this thread I won't lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 11:38 AM
1

Take your upvote, I laughed. Thanks man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 09:10 PM
11

I guess you don't have to imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 08:17 PM
2

r/ihavesex
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 04:37 PM
1

So the common factors used to measure quality of life are usually life length, mental and physical health (both diagnosed, and extrapolated from survey), using happiness index markers to understand contentment, and perhaps a fiscal measure related to mental health (to understand impact of financial stress). If you read the studies properly it will provide you with an in depth background of the demographic being studied too, as this can have an impact on results obviously. The ones I've read are …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 08:49 AM
2

To play devils advocate, we have all seen the studies where mens quality of life is improved when married, whilst women's quality of life actually decreases. So from this, we can make a similarly broad statement to the ones in your OP that actually, women improve men's life in a relationship, whilst men do not improve women's. The argument that I've seen others use in this thread, that 'well men built civilization, etcetera' does not hold in this discussion, since we are discussing 1-to-1 in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 09:22 AM
7

I have to say though, I think a large part of that lack of diversity in women's porn is due to the fact that the market is so small. A lot of women don't watch porn, so it's safer to make it with conventionally attractive people to cover most of your bases. Whereas the market for men's porn is larger (as more blokes watch it) so it allows the market to create more niche genres. After all, the most famous porn stars that folks could name are all still stupidly hot (conventionally attractive) men …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 08:11 AM
2

Dude, I will say that she already answered the question in her original comment, she said she don't like them due to her upbringing. So I understand why she responded the way she did to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 01:17 PM
1

The asexuals want to know your location.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 10:17 AM
1

Is this due to the potential culture clash that could occur or?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 09:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter