TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wolfen_To Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by Wolfen_To on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Patriarchal/traditional practices of controlling women's was always a strategy by unattractive at getting a shot at mating. What they couldn't get with reciprocal attraction was obtained by force.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:27 AM
1

Most likely, porn has already reduced the number of ugly (but non predatory) creeps that annoys girls irl since they have found a sexual palliative. Any advances on that front won't probably change any guys that are likely to harass and make unwanted approaches anyway nor will it decrease the number of such things because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/17 11:43 PM
1

and "naturally muscular" meaning just that he's tall and has broad shoulders while being generally fit without any mention of muscle size. So natural iow? Both his height and broad shoulders are not the result of training. The kind of build some men develop through bodybuilding is not attractive to most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 11:10 PM
1

Natural is -as the name implies, a man being able to attract without resorting to sleezy tricks. He can attract with what nature gave him without having to use some kind of palliative to hide his defects.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 11:07 PM
1

Nah, just pathetic. Telling a bunch of loser failed guys that if they just act like sexual pests and they have the "right mindframe" they'll suddenly go from evoking "eww, what a creepy ugly loser" to "I want this guy" isn't sexist in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 11:02 PM
2

Reading a few of her last posts, she has a very very similar style (and description -young women, self describe as conventionally attractive, like artsy type guy) as Wolfsouls. Speaking of, anyone knows what happened to her? She seemed to have deleted her account?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 10:11 PM
1

Yup. On an biological level it signals that the male's genes can't attract a partner (and thus can't sire children that have the potential to be sexually successful themselves - especially if they're male) . Not someone we want to mate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 09:54 PM
2

Probably better to only include people within a date-able age, like between 18-35.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 07:01 AM
0

I don't agree with this. Though ugly/unattractive men do perhaps develop misogynistic beliefs more often than their attractive peers due to their bitterness at not attracting women, while good looking men don't share this inherent resentment (though there are misogynistic good looking guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:17 PM
0

Yeah, exactly. As if we're going to go from physically repulsed to physically attracted mid-fuck all of a sudden (I know your comment was /s I'm just commenting on people who say stuff to girls like "you should give him a chance" and things like that). Doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:44 PM
0

It's not about it being over or under-rated, it's just about something being your preference or something that attracts you or not. I was saying that as a girl myself I'd rather go for the gorgeous 6'0"+ tall guy instead of the quote "5' 4" hideously ugly manlets who have absolutely awful character to boot" lol as the comment above was saying. So for the person who does have a preference for tall guys, then it's not overrated (unless you're saying going after people that attracts you is overrate…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:35 PM
5

Abundance of men in general who are either not particularly attractive or downright gross? Sure. Abundance of actually attractive, desirable guys? Oh my, no...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 03:33 AM
3

Yeah but if you weren't picky then the 5' 4" hideously ugly manlets who have absolutely awful character to boot could reproduce and you could make little copies of them. Ewww yeah ah, I think I'll stick with the 6'0+ gorgeous good looking tall guys who's amazingly smart and funny to boot, thanks lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 03:23 AM
2

Yes. This. Plus having sex with someone you're not attracted to is gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 03:07 AM
1

Even then, height wasn't a top predictor of sperm donor success. It's probably due to height having already been pre-selected. so to speak (all the inadequate or too short sub 5'9" men have already been rejected as potential donors) so height doesn't matter very much as a criteria in the context of the donors available (5'10"+)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:23 PM
1

There's plenty of gay male allies/feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:10 PM
1

It can be an indication of underlying genetic problems as some conditions will cause a reduced height. I guess we'd rather be on the safe side when selecting donors. edit: There's also such a thing as too tall (6'5"+ for me would be too tall, 6'1" or 6'2" would be near the ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 10:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter